|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| What about
this word 'firmament' (ch.1.7)(AV,
KJV - different words used in NIV)? Just what can it refer to? Maybe just
'sky' or 'heaven'. The hebrew word raqiya'
occurs 17 times and is only translated 'firmament' (in the AV). Most of
the occurrences are in Gen 1 but 6 are elsewhere: Ps.
19:1 Ps.150:1 Eze 1:23-26 (3 occurrences) Dan. 12:3. When you have looked
these up, you are left wondering if there is more to this word. Does it
also refer to the glory of God? Just a thought. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2
v24 Here we have a two stage process, both of
which apply equally (or maybe more so) to our allegience to God, as well
as to marriage, as shown in the passages below
First
we must leave: Psa.45:10,
Matt.19:29, Luke 14:33 |
||||||||||
| ch
1
- The Genesis record is so simple in the way it lays out the days of creation.
A straight forward reading of the text cannot but lead to the view that
creation took six literal 24 hour periods. Anyone who wishes to dispute
this is importing scientific theory to explain plain text. There is no Scriptural
basis for a non literal reading of the Genesis creation text.
ch2:8 The garden 'planted' in Eden is echoed in the vineyard 'planted [Isaiah 5:2] and the planting of Israel as a 'noble vine' [Jeremiah 2:21] All these
'plantings' show that God is concerned to work with man and that he commences
the work with the 'planting' |
||||||||||
| A
SUITABLE HELPER When God created Adam he put him in the garden he had planted in Eden to work it and take care of it. Adam's job was to be the gardener, taking care of the creation of God, helping it to grow and mature. God also had Adam name all the animals, but among them all Adam could not find a helper that was suitable for him. So God created Eve, a woman, from one of Adam's ribs to be a companion and a suitable helper for Adam. God has a plan for your life. He has a job for you to do. Adam's job was to be a gardener; David's was to be king; Jesus was to save the world from sin and death; and the Apostle Paul's was to preach. Whatever the plan God has for our life or the job he has given us to do, if we are married, God has provided our partner to be a suitable helper for us as we live out his plan in our lives. The ideal situation is that the husband and wife have one vision which they both work towards and help each other on the way. Husbands: Esteem and appreciate the help your wife gives. Wives: Help, support and encourage your husband as he does the work God has given him. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 1:26
Whereas Adam was created in the image and likeness of God Adam's children
were in his image and likeness (Genesis
5:3) - what a contrast!
2:18
In saying that it is not good for man to be alone we have the first indication
of fellowship. Man need company of likeminded people - exemplified in
a wife who answers to him. A picture of Christ and the ecclesia. |
||||||||||
| What
a Blessing to know that our Heavenly Father can take total chaos and create
out of it, a functional, dynamic, God glorifying creation.
Your personal life might, at this point in time, resemble the state of things that existed right here at the beginning of time on this planet... dark, turbulent, sad, dysfunctional and "lifeless". But the powerful creative words of our Loving Heavenly Father can change all that, even as they changed the face of this globe in just 6 days, 6,000 years ago. The God of the Bible can transform your life into a dynamic, vibrant, fully functional creation that will give HIM glory for ever and ever. How? By opening your heart to HIS gracious message in HIS wonderful book, the Bible. Is it hard, I hear you ask? No. The simplest of folk can understand this wonderful book, and the most intellectual will never exhaust it's wonders and beauty. Why not begin this New Year with a resolution to let this Word into your life every day for the year. Download the free audio player and listen to the Bible being read to you while you read the words yourself and follow the comments offered for each reading. Share
this service with your friends and family and spread the joy of being
a part of God's New Creation. |
||||||||||
| 2:21
The hole in Adam's side brought forth the woman, his helper. So the hole
in Christ's side gave birth to His bride - us, the ecclesia. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to David |
||||||||||
A basic point but worth mentioning. The creation account speaks of ‘evening and morning’ (Gen 1:5 etc:) whereas we usually speak of the day starting in the morning. Genesis sets the scene for how Scripture speaks of days. Gen 2:25 Whereas Adam and Eve were ‘naked’ and ‘not ashamed’ this changed with their sin. However we can be ‘not ashamed’ through our hope (Rom 5:5) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Gen 1:2-3 The 33rd. Psalm explains creation so clearly, that is easy for us to miss just what he is saying. “By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.” This is exactly what is recorded in the account of creation. Gen. 1:2. “The Spirit of God” The word spirit and the word breath in the Psalm are the same. Ruach 7307. Then starting in verse 3, we see the phrase “and God said” repeated as each day of creation begins. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Nine verses in Gen 1 (v.3,6,9,11,14,20,24,26,29) begin And God said... We cannot help but remember that 'In the beginning was the Word'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The aramaic version is consistent and renders it firmament in every place. In the following passages the word in the original is the same, and comparison yields the conclusion above stated. “God called the firmament heaven” (Gen 1:8). “Lights in the firmament of heaven,” the sun and moon (v.14-15). “Give ear, O ye heavens,” Moses to the rulers of Israel (Deut 32:1). “Hear thou in heaven thy dwelling-place,” Solomon’s prayer (1Kin 8:30). “Elijah went up . . . into heaven” (2Kin 2:11). “I create new heavens” (Isa 65:17). “Thy kingdom (O Nebuchadnezzar) shall be sure unto thee after that thou shalt have known that the heavens do rule” (Dan 4:26). The heaven is put before the earth in Gen 1:1 (“the heaven and the earth”) because that is the true and natural order. There was a time when there was no earth (Prov 8:23); but there never was a time when there was no heaven, in the highest sense of God’s dwelling place. And even in the subordinate sense, there is doubtless much in heaven that is older than earth—the sun, for instance. An uninspired speculator of Moses’ time might easily have represented the earth as older than heaven; and it would scarcely be as foolish to say that the earth was eternally pre-existent, as to say “There is no God.” [Vol. 47: The Christadelphian : Volume 47. 2001, c1910. The Christadelphian, volume 47. (electronic ed.). Logos Library System (Vol. 47, Page 222). Birmingham: Christadelphian Magazine & Publishing Association.] Jean Cheetham [Moorestown New Jersey (US)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Jean |
||||||||||
Gen 1:2 - "was" according to the NIV can also be translated "became" which perhaps would allow for a pre-Adamic creation. Gen 1:5 - darkness before light is how creation both natural and spiritual occur. Heb 11:3 - the NT supplements the process of how creation started. Gen 1:21 - "creature" [Heb. "nephesh" (5315) means a breathing creature, animal, beast, body, man, person, life, soul, etc.]. In Psa 49:12-20 - we read that man and beast upon death go to the "grave" [Heb. "sheol" (7585) means grave, hell, pit, etc.]. Gen 2:2-3 - seventh day of rest. 2Pet 3:8 - a day is as 1000 years. A millenial day of rest Heb 4:3-9;Rev 20:4. Gen 2:7 - KJV translates man became a living "soul" whereas the NIV translates man became a living "being". The word for both soul and being is the Heb. "nephesh" (5315). Gen 2:17; Rom 6:23 - the result/wages of sin is death. Interestingly, there is no mention of immortal soul in the Bible.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
The first two chapters of Genesis firmly establish Yahweh (Gen 2:4) as the creator of heaven and earth and all things found therein. The things of creation, which we see around us, give testimony to the existence of the One who made them (Rom 1:20). All men can see the LORD's handiwork, and yet many have slipped into idolatry (Rom 1:21-23). Today, the god of Evolution is worshipped and Yahweh is denied. When judgement comes, true believers will be saved and idolatrous liars will be cast out (Rev 22:14,15). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1 Notice the way that the language of this chapter is used – in reverse – to mark the destruction of Egypt in the plagues
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:15 Adam’s word to ‘dress and keep’ the garden signifies the work of the priest who was to Num 3:38 ‘keep the charge’ of the sanctuary – the Hebrew is the same on both occasions. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Gen 1 It was recently pointed out to us that it is only at the completion of the second day that the phrase "God saw that it was good" has not been recorded. (note Gen 1:4,10,12,18,21,25) We are however told in Gen 1:31 that everything "was very good." Has any one got a thought why we are not told that the work of day two was not concluded with this phrase as the other days were? John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
2:16 The command from God in the Garden of Eden was the first test of faith. Adam and Eve knew that God existed. They had to believe that he would keep His word. That s what faith is – believing God is reliable. Rom 4:21 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Yahweh is the creator of all things, including scientific laws. But in His book, The Bible, He chooses not to define creation in scientific terms. He simply asks us to believe His simple overview of creation. However, scientists, in general, have dismissed the Bible creation account and have substituted their own hypotheses. They demand that people choose between the Bible or science. This is not necessary as the Bible and science are not in conflict. In his readable book, Bible and Science, John C. Bilello, a respected scientist, discusses these aspects. Please contact me for details on how to acquire this book. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:1,3 ‘Finished’ and ‘rested … and made’ is quoted in Heb 4:3,4,9 as part of an argument about the future kingdom of God. Therefore we can conclude that God’s resting was to show that there will be a time of rest. It is not simply that God had finished creation so had a rest. There is a deeper spiritual lesson here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The first five books of the Bible (The Pentateuch) was originally one scroll. Nobody knows when they were divided into five separate books. However, all agree that Moses was the writer of The Pentateuch. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:1 Both Mark 1:1and John 1:1 echo the creation language in their gospel highlighting the fact that the whole creation activity centres around God’s plan of redemption in Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Gen 1:31 First Principles>Hell Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
| Gen 1:3;2Cor 4:6. Gen 1:27;Matt 19:3-5;Mark 10:6. Gen 2:7;1Cor 15:45-46. Gen 2:24;Matt 19:3-5;Mark 10:8;Eph 5:31. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
Gen 1:26,27,31 - The appendix has long been thought of as nothing more than a worthless evolutionary artifact. Now researchers are suggesting the appendix is a lot more than a useless remnant. Not only is it recently suggested to possess a critical function, but scientists now find it appears in nature a lot more often than before thought. "Maybe it's time to correct the textbooks," said researcher William Parker, an immunologist at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C. "Many biology texts today still refer to the appendix as a 'vestigial organ.'"
Parker and his colleagues recently suggested that the appendix still served as a vital safehouse where good bacteria could lie in wait until they were needed to repopulate the gut after a nasty case of diarrhea. Past studies had also found the appendix can help make, direct and train white blood cells.
The above is derived from Aug. 12, 2009 in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
God created our bodies from the dust of the earth. The more science investigates the human body the more brilliantly engineered and complex it is found to be - and from inexpensive materials no less - according to "Believe It or Not" issue number 32 (1982) the entire human body is comprised of materials worth a mere $6.50. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
Gen 1:26 - "God said, 'Let us make man in our image...'" Who was around besides God at this time? It would have to be the angels. Gen 19:1-5;Heb 13:2. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
The creation account can be summarised as follows: First day - Light. This is interesting as the sun, moon and stars are not yet created. Take a look at Rev 22:5 Second day - God puts a firmament (an expansion of space) between the waters that are above & below the firmament. Third day - Land and sea and plant life. Fourth day - Sun, moon and stars. Fifth day - Fish & fowl. Sixth day - Land animals and man. Seventh day - God rested. So, why did God create the earth? Isa 45:18 informs us that it was created to be inhabited, and Rev 4:11 informs us that all things were created for God's pleasure. Tim Taylor [Studley, UK] Comment added in 2009 reply to Tim |
||||||||||
1 We should realise that the Genesis account of creation is not for the purpose of describing what actually happened with the physical creation but it has more to do with highlighting God’s purpose to fill the world with his glory through people. This is seen from the way in which Heb 1:3 says that ‘we understand that the worlds (ages) were framed by the word of God’ – notice that Hebrews carefully avoids physical creation type language. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:18 there is no such word as helpmeet. It's one of our inventions which we hear regularly. God provided help for Adam, a help that was meet, suitable, fit (ESV) for him. In French, the word used here, literally translated, means someone who corresponded to Adam. This wasn't just a casual partner. This was someone who would work with Adam, who complemented him and, as such, forms the prototype of husands and wives to come. Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2009 reply to Ken |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Ps.
1:6
tells us that God knows our ways. We are, effectively, as we read in Genesis,
naked in his sight. Nothing can be hidden. And yet this Psalm tells us that this
knowledge that God has of us is good, not bad - it is the unrighteous that will
perish. The reason, of course, is in the saving work of Jesus. Consider the sentiments
expressed in Heb.
4:13-16 in this context. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2
v.6 is the first mention of Zion in the Psalms. This is a fascinating
study which is taken up elsewhere in these notes from time to time. In
this initial context consider these other Psalms - 48:1-2,
50:2, 78:68, 132:13-14
As well
as these Psalms, we can see the fulfilment both in Jesus and in the inclusion
of the faithful at the end - Heb
12:22, Rev.14:1 |
||||||||||
| 1:2
we probably think that being like the one who has 'his delight in the law
of the Lord' is an ideal we will never attain. However Paul - Romans
7:22 - says that he can win the battle with the flesh by having this
mind. A lesson for us. The only way to be at peace with ourselves is to
have this mind.
2:6
In setting the king on Zion the record is speaking of 'anointing' because
that is what the word translated 'set' means. This setting will be achieved
because Jesus was raised from the dead - :7
'thou art my son
' is used in the New Testament Acts
13:37, Hebrews 1:3 - to speak of the risen Jesus. |
||||||||||
| Psalm
1 - HOW HAPPY! The very first word of the book of Psalms is the word "Blessed." In many other places through the Bible this same Hebrew word is translated "Happy" or "How happy." The book of Psalms is like the song-book of the Bible and it begins by telling us the secret of true happiness. The truly happy person is one who does not do wicked things or go to the places of wickedness. Instead he delights in the law, thinking about it all the time. The person in this Psalm is described like a tree planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in season and whose leaf does not wither. Those words remind me of the Garden of Eden which was placed at the junction of four rivers that watered the garden. In the middle of the garden was the tree of life. If you ate its fruit you would live for-ever. It also reminds me of the last chapters of the book of Revelation where we read about the trees of life on either side of the river of God. It yielded fruit and the leaves were for the healing of the nations. The picture in Psalm 1 is of a man who loves God, who is refreshing, healing, who is perfectly happy and will ultimately live for ever. Is it a picture of you? Psalm
2 - JESUS IS KING - LIKE IT OR LUMP IT |
||||||||||
| 1:3
By 'the rivers of waters' is where the bridegroom is to be found (Song
of Solomon 5:12)
2:4
In saying that the Lord will 'laugh' we see language picked up (2
Kings 19:21) by Isaiah in speaking of Babylon. |
||||||||||
| Did
you know that our Loving Heavenly Father has promised us an inheritance?
HE tells us so in many places in the Bible, and we read it here in Psalm
2.
What is so great about an 'inheritance?" For a start, an inheritance is usually passed on from the parents to the children. What do the children have to do to receive the inheritance? Usually what is required from them is to simply remain true to the family values. What loving father would not want to share the family inheritance with all his offspring who love him and adore him? Of course, none of us is naturally "born" into the Family that Psalm 2 is speaking about. Our "birth" involves a conscious decision to "change families" and allow God in Heaven to "adopt" us as HIS Sons and Daughters. And HIS feelings for us, are not unlike those that we ourselves have for our very own offspring that please us well, except, of course, HIS feelings toward us are perfect and pure and just and right. Will we receive the inheritance then? The "Firstborn Son" has already tasted the inheritance, and the Father has promised that "there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus." Our
Father wants us to share the inheritance with His Firstborn Son. The Son
wants very much to share the inheritance with us. The question then lies
with ourselves.... will we allow our lives to be guided by the Spirit
of God, so that we as Sons of God, might receive the great inheritance
of God? |
||||||||||
In Psalm 1 we have, described for us in a nutshell, all we have to do to receive blessings from God. Blessed is the man who: Doesn't walk according to the advice of the ungodly but instead: Delights in the law of God I think we can all from time to time become wrapped up in trying to better ourselves, making ourselves do good works. We can become very dispondant when we fail. We sometimes measure ourselves against the example of others, or of Christ, which can make us feel unworthy or worthless. However, this is not the advice of this Psalm. The Psalm suggests that if only we remove ourselves from bad influences, and plant ourselves in good influences, then we will bear fruit. Fruit grows automatically on that tree, as it will with us. Once we realise this, we will never feel wretched at our lack of works, because instead we will wait patiently for God to bring forth fruit in us. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
1:3 The man who is blessed whose ‘leaf also shall not wither’ is like the everlasting trees by the water in Ezekiel’s temple (Eze 47:12) 2:8 In saying ‘ask of me …’ God is telling Jesus, in advance, that he is the heir of the world – a great antidote to the temptations of the ‘devil’ (Luke 4:6) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psa 1:1 shows the three-step progression into sin. Choices can be made at each juncture of this progression. First we can choose to walk towards something unwholesome that attracts us. When we reach that destination we can choose to pass on by or stand and observe what is going on. After observation we can choose to either walk away or stay and sit which means that we are now willing participants in that sinful activity. This progression answers to the one of lust as described in James 1:14,15:Walk = drawn away Stand = enticed Sit = conceived And we are reminded that the final result of any sinful activity, left uncorrected and not forgiven, will bring forth death. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 1:1 In this opening verse of the Psalms we see a graduations of evil. We start with walking with the ungodly, then we progress to standing with them, and finally we find ourselves sitting with them. and conforming to their conduct. We must take heed to the word of the Psalmist. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
1:6 - Notice it is the way of the righteous that God knows. By implication He does not know the way of the ungodly. Let us rejoice in our knowledge that by His grace we are righteous and therefore known of Him (John 10:14-17, 2Tim 2:19) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Chaff is very useful, then becomes worthless. The husk or skin of the kernel protects the seed while it is growing. But when harvest time comes, there is no need for the covering, and the wind drives it away
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
Many feel the Psalms are divided into 5 parts corresponding to the first 5 books of the of the Bible. Accordingly, chapters 1-41 (beginning; man and his relationship to God; all blessing is bound up in obedience) correspond to Genesis, chapters 42-72 (Israel as a nation; ruin, redeemer, redemption) correspond to Exodus, chapters 73-89 (God's sanctuary) correspond to Leviticus, chapters 90-106 (Israel's relation to the nations and sojourn) correspond to Numbers, and chapters 107-150 (God and His Word; obedience) correspond to Deuteronomy. The last 5 Psalms (146-150) are also perhaps an echo of the first 5 books of the Bible.
2:6-12 - The first messianic Psalm. V.7 - "begotten/become" implies conception and birth Acts 13:33. "rod of iron" (KJV) or "iron scepter" (NIV) reinforces the message of Gen 49:10. The future messianic prophesy of Psa 2:9 is possibly elaborated on in Rev 2:26-27;12:5;19:15-16. And despite the warnings we find comfort that Christ's followers can trust /take refuge in him v.12. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
1:4 ‘Chaff’ In Scripture is always presented as useless.
2:10 The instruction that the kings of the earth will receive will be the law of God that will go forth from Jerusalem Isa 2:3 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
1:1 ‘Blessed is the man’ is a recurring phrase in the Psa 32:3, 65:4, 74:8, 84:5,12, 94:12, Psa 112:1. A review of these passages will enable us to build up a picture of how we should behave. The idea then passes into New Testament use in the Sermon on the Mount ‘Blessed are they …’ Matt 5:4,6,10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
A psalm is a poem. Psalms were set to music and became the Jewish hymnbook. There are 150 psalms, most of which were written around 1000 BC, during the times of David and Solomon. The credited writers of the psalms, and the number they wrote, are: David 73 Solomon 2 Sons of Korah 12 Asaph 12 Herman 1 Ethan 1 Moses 1 Unknown 48 Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:6 I know thy works in Rev 2:2 echoes the idea of ‘the Lord knoweth the way of the righteous’ Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
TRUE HAPPINESS When my four year old nephew got exactly what he wanted for his birthday, he was very excited. As the initial excitement wore off, he was heard to say, "I'm happy now!" How close are we to gaining true happiness? Like my nephew, we may think we will be happy when we have new possessions, a new way of life, a new relationship or the freedom to do the things we want to do. But when those wants are fulfilled, there will always be others to take their place. Psalm 1 tells us the secret of true happiness. The word "Blessed" can also be translated "Happy." Psalm 1 starts out with the words, "Blessed (or Happy) is the man." (Psa 1:1) It then goes on to describe the things about this person that make them happy. We learn that the happy man's "delight is in the law of the LORD, and in his law he meditates day and night." (v.2) The happy man is one whose thoughts are constantly in God's word. His actions will follow his thoughts because actions always follow the direction our minds take us. But more than that, this is a man who is God centred. The way to get in touch with God is to listen to him. Reading and meditating on God's word, his law, is the way to do it. The truly happy man is a God centred man. Let us be God centred and truly happy. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
Psalm 2 applies to David, Yahweh's anointed. But the secondary application clearly applies to Jesus, the only begotten Son of the Father. Here we see an end-time reference when Jesus, returned from heaven, will establish Himself as king in Jerusalem, and put down the enemies of Yahweh. He will plead with the rulers of the world to recognize His kingship. Those who do accept Him will find blessing. Those who do not will be punished. These events are not far off. Knowing that should encourage us to be ready. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:3 The way in which the man who delights in God’s law is like a ‘tree planted by water’ is picked up in Jer 17:8 The basis in this Psalm forms the encouragement in the days of Jeremiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Psa 2:8-9 First Principles>Kingdom of God>To be Everlasting and world-wide The Kingdom of God will be a literal kingdom on the earth and last for ever. For more details go to Dan 2:44 Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
| Prophesied conspiring against Christ that included Gentile opposition - Psa 2:1-2;Acts 4:1-3,23-27. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| Psa 2:7;Heb 1:5;Heb 5:5. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| Psa 2:6 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King Jesus will be the future King. For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
Psa 2:1-2The way in which these verses are quoted by brethren – Acts 4:24 – upon the release of Peter and John – are applied to the persecution of Jesus provides the most powerful basis for understanding the Psalm as being Messianic. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The walking-standing-sitting sequence has been well covered above, but here are a few further thoughts: Walking: you're going the same way, but not necessarily with them; then you stop and stand with them - you're associating yourself with them; then comes the point where you sit down and join them. There's a second progression involved: ungodly, sinners and scorners. The first are not necessarily against God, it's just that he doesn't feature in their lives, they are ungodly or without God; the second, the sinners, are those who disobey God's command; the third are those who go one step further and are actively encouraging others to be sinners. Then we find a third progression. For the time being, you're walking in the counsel of the ungodly. Then you stop. You're standing joining in with, being part of the way of the sinner; then once seated in the seat of the scornful (note that it's the scorner's seat, not ours) - you're there on his terms, not yours or God's - it's very difficult to get up and walk away. 1Cor 15:33 Do not be deceived: "Bad company ruins good morals." Peter followed Jesus at a distance, going along with the crowd. Later he stopped in the courtyard of the high priest, where he sat down with the guards, denying Jesus three times. What of Jesus himself? Surely, we can argue that he walked with the ungodly? Isn't that part of his purpose whilst on earth? Yes, but…. He didn't walk in the counsel of the ungodly by any stretch of the imagination. Just the reverse. He wasn't interested in their counsel, but in God's counsel. When did he ever stand in the way of sinners? He met with them, he discussed with them, but never allied himself to them. There are surprisingly few occasions where it's recorded that Jesus sat down and they are all quite specific. He either sat down with the disciples, or sat down - for example in a boat - in order to teach the people, or he sat down in the temple. You can add to that list the moment when he sat on the donkey to make his triumphal entry. Then of course, we read that when he was before Pilate, it was Pilate who sat down, amazingly, on what is described as The Judgment Seat Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2009 reply to Ken |
||||||||||
v3 Jer 17:8 Verse 3 immediately conjures up more ideas, looking both forwards and backwards. Similar phrasing crops up in Jacob's blessing to Joseph and we're all familiar with the concept of Joseph as a type of Christ: Gen 49:22 "Joseph is a fruitful bough, a fruitful bough by a spring; his branches run over the wall. If we look at the Psalm as talking of Christ, then the scale comes into play. Joseph was a branch, Jesus is the complete tree. They are rivers of water. This is moving, flowing water, not stagnant water. The ESV, RSV and NIV have streams The NEB watercourse. The words take us forward, too, to the Book of Revelation: Rev 22:1 Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb. The fact that here it's called a river of water of life lifts the concept to another level. To start with, the tree of Psalm 1 was planted there. It didn't just happen. Jesus was "planted" by God here on the earth, ultimately to bring life. He was crucified on a dead tree - the cross, but that death will ultimately bring life 1Pet 2:24 He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed. Cursed is the man who is hanged on a tree, yet, here in the Psalm, blessed is the man who becomes a tree of life John 7:37-38 On the last day of the feast, the great day, Jesus stood up and cried out, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, 'Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.'" This tree - or Jesus - must bring forth fruit, the rest of verse 3 tells us. Perhaps we can consider ourselves as part of that fruit and we, in turn, like Joseph, must become fruitful branches. The exhortation to us is surely hat we can't sit back and do nothing. We all know of brethren and sisters who are inactive in the Truth. We perhaps know entire Ecclesias that fit the bill. Here we're being told that we can't be. We have to be actively working, trying to be fruitful. John 15:5 I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. Jesus' leaves certainly won't wither - he's an evergreen! - and ours shouldn't either. We should be constantly striving to bring forth fruit and if we remain planted by the river of life, whatsoever we do we shall prosper. The tree was planted here by the flowing water so that it could draw up that water of life and so flourish. Again there's a link back to Joseph: Gen 39:3 His master saw that the LORD was with him and that the LORD caused all that he did to succeed in his hands.Similar wording too in Gen 39:23 See also Eze 47:12 Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2009 reply to Ken |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| The visit of the
Wise men (Gentiles) makes a great deal of connections between the old and new
testaments. The star has been with us since Joseph
or even Abraham,
but is particularly associated with the wise men in Isa.
60:3, which of course
links with Luke
2:32. Finally take
your thoughts to Rev.22:16 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1:23 Whilst some might say that 'virgin' just means 'young maid' thus minimising the miraculous when we bring other Scriptures to bear on the account we learn that Mary was truly a virgin as she had not 'known' Joseph before the birth of Jesus Matthew 1:25
In saying 2:20 'for they are dead which sough the young child's life' we see the first of many links between Jesus and Moses - see Exodus 4:19 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| GIFTS
FOR THE KING Wise men came to the house where Jesus was living with his mother. They brought with them gifts, Gold, Incense and Myrrh. The gifts they gave were the best, they were expensive and they were especially chosen to give to the new king. They gave gold for its purity and value. They gave incense for its steady burning glow and the beautiful smell it emitted. And they gave myrrh for its healing and embalming qualities. We cannot give him gifts today as the wise men did on that day. But in our actions and in our service we can give him the same. We can give gold by keeping our lives pure and letting him refine us to be his perfect and treasured possession. We can give incense when we pray and offer up constant praises and thanksgiving to the lord of Life. And we can give myrrh when we pass on the healing and life that flows from our Lord. We could offer gifts to Jesus, but richer by far is the adoration of our hearts and our love freely given to him. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 1:19
Joseph is described by God as 'Just'. How many other people does God describe
as 'just'?
2:2
In saying that they had come to see the 'king of the Jews' we have the
first occurrence of the phrase which is used at the death of Jesus - John
19:3 |
||||||||||
| Have
you ever wondered about the difficulties the maiden Mary would have had
in convincing her family and associates about her obvious pregnancy. No
other women had EVER become pregnant like this maiden did.
And it was necessary for it to be so, for the Scripture had prophesied that "a virgin shall conceive..." but every woman who had conceived before her, and every woman who has conceived after her, could not have been a "virgin" in the strict sense of the word, because the actual physical act of conception occurs after the woman has lost her virginity. What
strength of character this wonderful maid in Israel had, that the God
of the Universe should choose her, out of all the billions that have ever
existed, to bring His Only Begotton Son into this world.... for us! |
||||||||||
* Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 1:19 - The greek word used for 'publick example' paradeigmatizo (3856) only occurs once elsewhere in scripture and is used interestingly of the public shame of her baby - when grown - when denied by those who fall away - Heb 6:6 - 'seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:17 there are 3 groups of 14 generations – consider the way 42 figures in Scripture (3 X 14) Rev 11:2, 13:5 – is there a connection? 2:2 The wise men saw ‘his star’. Maybe they had some insight into Num 24:17 where Balaam prophesied of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Matt 1:1 What a perfect way to begin the record of the Lord Jesus Christ. The book of the Genesis of Jesus Christ. The conquest of sin and death. The son of David. The promise of a throne. Authority. 2Sam 7:12 The son of Abraham. The promise of a land. Inheritance. Gen 12:1-3 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Christ a poor child, laid down in a crib, and though given no attention by his own people, receives nonetheless a noble witness of his kingly estate from strangers: which his own people unknowingly let happen, although they did not acknowledge him. But not just strangers—rejoicing strangers from afar off. Acts 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off,... Those who live at the greatest distance from the means of grace often use most diligence, and learn to know the most of Christ and his salvation. But no curious arts, or mere human learning, can direct men to him. We must learn of Christ by attending to the word of God, as a light that shines in a dark place. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:11-13 Mary and Joseph must have been comforted by the visit of the wise men, and by what they did. It was a confirmation of the wonderful things that had been spoken before about the child.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| TAINTED HISTORY Considering the genealogy in Matthew is the genealogy of the King and Saviour of the world, it does not make impressive reading. If any of us had been putting it together we would have been kept free from blemish, ignoring or skimming over those who need not be noted if they did not contribute to the standing of the Saviour. But God left them in. Let's think about the women who are mentioned. Tamar was not Judah's wife. Tamar was Judah's daughter-in-law, the wife of his eldest son. But by an act of prostitution Tamar became pregnant by Judah and contributed to the line of the King. Rahab was both a prostitute and a Canaanite, an inhabitant of the cursed city of Jericho. Through her marriage to Salmon she also became part of the royal line. Ruth was a woman of fine character but was a Moabite, bringing cursed blood into the family line.. Bathsheba, though not mentioned by name, is noted as Uriah's wife. As a result of adultery and murder, the wife of Uriah became David's wife and part of the royal ancestry. Mary is the only woman listed here of whom we read nothing bad. All these women were part of the ancestry of the sinless Saviour of the world. None was too bad to be included, and they show us that no matter what our past has been or what our background is, we can all be accepted as part of the family of God. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 1:20 It was through the angel sent by God that Joseph was made aware that Mary's conception was of the Holy Spirit. He must have been filled with great joy, for the sake of both Mary and of himself. He now understood that he would now be Mary's protector, providing for her physical needs, and defending her honor against malicious slander. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
Note that God communicated through Joseph concerning travelling to and returning from Egypt. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2003 Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The four Gospel accounts each show a different aspect of Christ's character: Mark shows Him as a servant Luke shows His humanity John shows his spiritual aspect Matthew - Isaiah - Lion (king) Mark - Jeremiah - Ox (servant) Luke - Ezekiel - Man (humanity) John - Daniel - Eagle (spirit) Matthew claims that there are fourteen generations between Abraham and David; fourteen between David and Babylon; and fourteen between Babylon and Christ ( 1:17). Actually there are more but Matthew has been selective with the genealogy.The reference to Jesus' being a Nazarene in the Old Testament seems not to be found ( 2:23). But it is. Isa 11:1 designates Jesus as being the Branch. Branch in Hebrew is netzar. Coming from the same word, Nazareth also means branch. And so, there is the link.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:17 there are 3 groups of 14 generations – consider the way 42 figures in Scripture (3 X 14) Rev 11:2, 13:5 – is there a connection? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
2:2 The wise men saw ‘his star’. Maybe they had some insight into Num 24:17 where Balaam prophesied of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| There are 5 women mentioned in the first chapter of Matthew. Matt 1:3 Tamar, who acted in a most unorthodox manner, but she felt cheated. She was with child by her father-in-law Judah, after pretending to be a harlot. Perhaps she was a woman of faith, who wanted to bear the “Seed of the Woman” who would bruise sin in the head. Then in Matt 1:5 we find Rahab. A wicked gentile, but one who repented, and after saving Joshua’s men she was rewarded with a place in the ancestry of Jesus Christ. Ruth, in Matt 1:5 was not of Israel (although she was of Moab, the son of Lot.) She became a Jewess, and totalled loved Israel’s God. Matt 1:6 doesn’t name Bathsheba, but is her story. She doesn’t shine at first, although the real blame must lie at David’s door. And then finally, in Matt 1:16 is Mary, of whom we know little, except that God counted her worthy to bear His Son. What a wonderful start to the Gospel narrative! Are they all 5 women of faith? Incidentally, there are also 5 women in Hebrews 11. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
2:3 Of course ‘all Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:1 Herod the Great was the Edomite who was made king by the Romans. Jesus was born in the year of his death. This fulfils the prophecy of Gen 49:10. 2:22 Archelaus took over from his father Herod the Great. However, the Romans gave him the position of ethnarch over Judea, Samaria, and Idumea. He was never granted the position of king. Archelaus did such an unfavorable job of governing that the Romans banished him to Vienne in Gaul. After that, the Romans governed the area as a Roman province. Thus Gen 49:10 remained true. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:9 Notice that because Joseph was ‘just’ he did not want to make a big show of dealing with Mary who he had thought had been unfaithful to him. How often do we think that the ‘right’ think to do is to make a public example of a brother or sister who Has fallen rather than deal with the matter quietly? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Comment on Matthew 2:16 - why did God allow the Children to be Killed? 2. God manifestation - not salvation of man, is God's purpose - Numb. 14:21; Hab 2:14, etc
Maritta Terrell [Austin/Leander] Comment added in 2009 reply to Maritta |
||||||||||
Jesus Christ is the promised son through whom salvation is possible (for part two see January 2nd) 1. Lineage came from David...Matt 1:1,7,16;Luke 3:23,31 [Heli is thought by many to be Mary's father though some sources feel Heli was perhaps the legal (not actual) father of Joseph with Mary having some of the same descendents as Heli such as King David, etc.]; Christ means "anointed" (i.e. appointed by God). 2. Christ was born...Matt 1:18,20 (born from the Holy Spirit i.e. power of God); Luke 1:31,35 (conceived by power of the Most High); Gal 4:4 (God sent His son who was born of woman); Luke 2:21; 2Cor 5:20-21 (God made Christ); John 17:3 (God sent Jesus Christ). 3. Many saw Christ but no one can see God...John 9:35-37; Christ fed 5000, 4000 and healed many; John 1:18 (no one has ever seen God); 1John 4:12; 1Tim 6:16 (God can't die or be seen by mortals); 1Cor 14:33 (God is not the author of confusion i.e. man is). 4. Jesus was lower than the Angels and God, Jesus died, Jesus was/is in service to God, Jesus is not equal to God but inferior, Jesus was made like man in every way, Jesus was tempted unlike God who can't sin (or be tempted)...Heb 2:9,14-18;Phil 2:1-6 [Christ didn't consider equality with God something to be grasped (some versions have Phil 2:6 poorly translated - compare NIV, NASB, RSV with KJV)]; Num 23:19; Psa 8:4-6;Acts 4:8-12; John 14:28;Matt 26:39 (Christ yielded to his Father's will - in considering the trinity does it seem logical that one part of God yielded His will and agreed to be sacrificed to be presentable to another part of God?). 5. Jesus learned (vs God who knows all things), was tempted, was molded, was sent/approved of/and resurrected by God, and sits at the right hand of God...Luke 2:52;Isa 7:14-15; Matt 1:23 (Christ was a reflection/manifestation of God); Rom 8:29;Heb 4:15;James 1:13;John 5:30;John 12:49;John 8:42;Acts 2:22-24;Acts 5:31;John 20:17;Acts 7:56. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| Matt 1:1 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King This verse is to do with the two covenants, the one which God made with Abraham, and the one with David. Both of these involve Jesus Christ who will reign on David's throne in Jerusalem. For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
|
THE ROLE OF A MAN Right back in the beginning, Adam was created and placed in the garden of Eden. He was given a task. "The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it." (Gen 2:15) In working the garden, Adam was given ther task of making it grow and making it beautiful. And in taking care of it, he was to protect it, keep it safe and look after it. This role Adam was given has been passed down to men throughout the ages. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus wasn't a gardner, but we see the same responsibilities placed on him as he took care of God's family. God gave Joseph four dreams and after each of them Joseph obeyed God's instruction to either tenderly nurture his family or to protect them. After his first dream he took Mary to be his wife and named the son she was given, Jesus. (Matt 1:24-25) After his second dream, Joseph protected his family by fleeing Herod's wrath and escaping to Egypt. (Matt 2:14-15) His third dream instructed him to go back to the land of Israel where the family could grow up in the garden of God, watered and nurtured among God's people. (v.20-21) And the fourth dream gave Joseph the role of protector, choosing Nazareth as an out of the way, trouble free spot in which to bring up his family. (v.22-23) From Adam to Joseph, to us today, the role is still the same. We need to grow, nurture, work, take care of and protect our families. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
1:23 ‘Emmanuel’ means ‘God with us’ – this was achieved through Jesus’ death so after his resurrection he could tell his disciples – Matt 28:20– ‘I am with you always’ Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||