January 12

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Genesis  22 and 23
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Genesis 22 online in the King James Version Listen to Genesis 23 online in the King James Version
Listen to Genesis 22 online in the New International Version Listen to Genesis 23 online in the New International Version

 

22v.2 - Moriah = "chosen by Jehovah". It is also the site of Solomon's temple 2Chron.3:1. This, we are told, here in Chronicles, was the site of the threshingfloor that David bought 2Sam 24:18-25. David was commanded by God 1Chron.21:18 (Araunah and Ornan are the same person) to buy back the land - the very place where Abraham sacrificed Isaac and make it a place of sacrifice again - and soon the site of the temple - where God chose to place his name - hence Moriah. We are this temple 1Cor.3:17
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
23v.9 - Abraham's desire to buy at the proper price regardless of their willingness (v.6) to provide the service for free fits with the principle of 'owe no man any thing' in Rom.13:8
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
ch 22 - When Abraham took Isaac to Mount Moriah to offer him as a burnt sacrifice do we think that Abraham had any thoughts about Melchisedec whom he had met in that area [Genesis 14] some years earlier?

23:4 - In describing himself as 'a stranger and a sojourner' Abraham demonstrated that he expected the promises to be fulfilled at a later date - by implication when he is raised from the dead.

This sets the pattern for our life. We should live in this world as 'strangers and pilgrims' 1 Peter 2:11 and as such should not follow the behaviour of those amongst whom we live.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

ISAAC AND JESUS

There are some amazing parallels in the story of the offering of Isaac by Abraham that match up with the sacrifice of Christ.
Abraham was told, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah and sacrifice him there as a burnt offering." We read in John 3 v 16 that "God so loved the world that he gave his one and only son." Jesus was the Son God loved who was sacrificed for our sins.
The burnt offering was the only offering that was totally sacrificed to God, totally consumed. Jesus gave up every part of his life completely to God - just like a burnt offering.
Isaac was sacrificed in the region of Moriah. This is where the temple was eventually built and where Christ was crucified. It became part of the city of Jerusalem.
Abraham said, "God himself will provide a lamb for the burnt offering." God provided Jesus, "The lamb who takes away the sins of the world." (John 1 v 29).
Isaac was as good as dead as Abraham raised his knife to slay him, but he was given back to Abraham alive. Christ died and was raised back to life again.
We read that "Abraham returned to his servants," (Verse 19) but Isaac is missing from the record. So, after his resurrection, Jesus ascended to heaven. His next appearance will be at the wedding feast in the kingdom. So with Isaac. His next mention is concerning his marriage to Rebekah, the bride selected by God.
There are many more parallels in this story for us to find. Try it. It makes you think, doesn't it?

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
22:2 Isaac was not Abraham's 'only son' at this time because Ishmael was alive. However the word translated 'only son' 03173 is a rare word in Scripture and seems to always be in a prophecy of Jesus
Genesis 22:2 only son *
Genesis 22:12 only son *
Genesis 22:16 only son *
Judges 11:34 only child *
Psalm 22:20 Darling *
Psalm 25:16 Desolate  
Psalm 35:17 Darling *
Psalm 68:6 Solitary  
Proverbs 4:3 Only (Beloved) *
Jeremiah 6:26 only son  
Amos 8:10 only son *
Zechariah 12:10 only son *
*indicates places where it is quite clear that we have a prophecy of Jesus.

23:12-13 In insisting in paying for the land in which he buried Sarah we see that Abraham lay no claim on the land which he had been promised.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Genesis 22 - How old was Isaac in this record? Most certainly it appears he was now a grown young man, not the little boy of some of the more fanciful tellers of the story for little children. Josephus claims that Isaac was around 25 years of age, which means that this incident took place when Abraham was 125 years old, and Sarah 115 years old. However, it is not impossible that Isaac may have been approaching 40 years of age, which would put his age close to the age of our Lord when He too was sacrificed and raised from the dead. In ancient Hebrew terms, a man was "young" until he reached the age of 40. Abraham would then have been 140, and Sarah dead for three years. No mention is made in Genesis 22 of Sarah, and what follows in Genesis 23 need not necessarily be in chronological order. If this latter proposition be correct, how much greater does Abraham's faith here appear? If Sarah is now dead, and Abraham knowing that the promise referred only to that seed produced between himself and Sarah... what must his thoughts have been as he contemplated sacrificing his only begotton son?
 
Genesis 22:3 - "And Abraham rose up early in the morning" - Six times in Jeremiah the prophet we are told that one of the great characteristics of our God, is that He "rises up early" to speak to His servants the prophets. It is also a characteristic of Godly men in the record that they too, rise up early in the morning to face often unpleasant tasks. Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Joshua, David,  Job and Jesus are all noted as sharing this uncommon trait. Who among us, had we been in Abraham's shoes, would not have wanted to sleep in on this morning, then linger over breakfast, and then procrastinate until the day was far spent, so that we could put of until tomorrow what ought to have been done today? There is a saying of the world  - "Do it!   Do it right!  Do it right now!"  Success among the children of men is often attributed to this very philosophy. How much more should the Sons of God be moved to attend with alacrity in things eternal?
 
Genesis 22:2-4 - Seven great acts of faith are recorded of Abraham here in this part of the record. Count them up... each one starts with "and."
 
Genesis 22:20-24 - The Divine record prepares us for the marriage of Isaac to Rebekah, by revealing the genealogy of Abraham's family who had chosen to stay in Haran. Abraham's attitude toward his family who were afar off is very instructive for ourselves in these days. It is too easy to cut our families off if they do not totally share our faith in God. After Isaac's release from off the alter, we hear no more of him until a bride is sought for him from among his own people, from among those who were closest to sharing his own faith.
 
Genesis 23:2 - It is worthy of remark, that Sarah is the only woman whose age, death, and burial are distinctly noted in the Sacred writings. What is meant in this verse that "Abraham came to mourn for Sarah?"  Can this imply that Sarah died whilst Abraham was away from the compound, perhaps tending his flocks in another area?
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

ch. 22  - We see in the way that God tried Abram that Abram was being tested that he might appreciate the strength of his faith. The trial was not for God’s benefit. He knew what Abram would do. Abram need to learn about himself. The same is true of ourselves. Our trials are for our benefit that we might learn about ourselves.

23:2 In saying that Abram ‘came to mourn for Sarah’ we might conclude that Abraham was not present at the time and place of her death.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

The ram was caught by his horns in a thicket. Is this a foretaste of  Christ’s crown of thorns?


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

Gen 22:2  To the best of my knowledge, no other man has ever been asked of God to offer his son as a sacrifice.

Gen 22:5  Bro. Cliff (above) asks. "How old was Issac" we have heard it suggested that he was 33. (same as Christ) The Hebrew word translated "lad" is NAAR (5288). In Gen 41:12 it is translated a "young man", we see in Gen 41:46 that Joseph was was thirty years old at the time. We do not know Issac's age, but it is possible he was 33.

Gen 22:2,13  Abraham was told to offer Issac as a burnt offering, and the ram that was caught in the thicket was offered as a burnt offering. The sin offering followed the burnt offering. Even though Issac was a type of Christ, he could not have replaced Him.     


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
22:2 The pattern of animal sacrifice had been firmly established pre-Mosaic Law.  It had first been performed as a covering for Adam and Eve (Gen 3:21) and then through the acceptable sacrifice of Abel (Gen 4:4).  The Sons of God (Seed of the Woman) subsequently would have continued the practice. Would they not have understood that sacrifice represented the coming messiah of promise (Gen 3:15) in the light of that which is expressed in Heb 9:22?
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
Gen 22:14 The authorized version Bible says: "And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovah-Jireh: as it is said to this day,In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen"
The Hebrew Bible says:
And I will call Abraham name the place he the Yahweh Yeereh that
he will say the day in mountain  Yahweh will be seen.
 Hebrew is an ecomomical language, there are no punctuaion, and Capitals and small letters are never in the same sentence (it is one or the other). also there are no vowels used, one must learn how to say a word from a teacher or some one thaat knows Hebrew.  Also there is no 'j' in Hebrew instead the letter 'y' is used.

Beryl Butler [London West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Beryl
22:8 - How much truth there is in this statement that Abraham makes 'God will provide himself a lamb'.  Abraham had first hand experience of God's miraculous provision in Isaac himself, but as well as this, he recognised that one day there would be a greater son - the lamb of God - who would take away the sins of the world.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

some parallels with Christ's sacrifice

22:2 - Moriah is where Solomon's temple was built and we read here of a sacrificial offering. Mention of your only son whom you love. Adam was a son just as Ishmael was a son but Christ and Isaac were manifestations of freedom not slavery. 22:3 - we have mention of a donkey leading the way to the sacrificial journey. Mention of servants with Isaac just as Jesus had others with him. 22:4 - reference to the third day. Jesus' servants abandoned him so at the end he was alone with his father for the final journey. 22:6 - wood placed on Isaac and Christ. 22:8 - the lamb. 22:12 - neither son saw corruption. 22:13 - a ram in a "thicket" Heb. "sebak" (5442) is similar to the  Matt 27:46 "sabachthani" Jesus actually said which means why hast thou "entangled me" as opposed to the passage referring to Christ's crucifixion beginning with the Psa 22:1 quote using the word "forsaken" Heb. "azab" (5800) means "relinquish, permit, commit self, forsake, leave", etc. derived from the Septuagint. Thus Jesus was pointing to the two prophesies at once and was preaching/clarifying till the end. Jesus knew why he was being sacrificed, it wasn't a question for him to ponder. Rather, it was a question raised for others to read scripture and consider the ramifications of.   Gen 23:9 - we find the full price was paid for a burial cave just as Christ (and his Father) paid the full price.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

22 The offering of Isaac provides the basis for the way in which Jephthah’s daughter dealt with her father’s vow.

Genesis 22

Language

Judges 11

language

22:5

Come again

11:31

Return in peace

 22:2

Burnt offering

11:31

Burnt offering

 22:2

Only son <03173>

11:34

Only child <03173>

 22:2

Mountains

11:37

Mountains

 22:2

The mountains

11:37

Upon the mountains

22:5

Come again

11:39

returned

Jephthah’s daughter was a living sacrifice as was Isaac

23:4 Abraham had been promised the land – Gen 17:8 – yet he describes himself as a ‘stranger and sojourner. An indication that he saw the promise of the inheritance of the land as a future thing and this informed the way he viewed present possession. How do we view the things of this life?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
GOD PROVIDES
 
Abraham was tested. God asked him to take his only son Isaac and to sacrifice him. Abraham did as he was told but at the crucial moment was stopped by the angel who explained to Abraham what the test was all about.
 
In the past I have always looked at Abraham's actions during his test. He obediently followed all the instructions he was given in a supreme display of faith, perhaps far more than we might ever dream of achieving. But there is a subtle theme that comes through the text to tell us how Abraham completed his task. Along with the theme of testing there is the refrain, "God will provide." When Isaac was asked where the lamb for the burnt offering was, Abraham's reply was, "God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son." (Gen 22:8) And then after the sacrifice had been made, "Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide." Then we read, "And to this day it is said, 'On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided.'" (v.14)
 
The key to having faith in God is knowing that he will provide. When we get tested in various ways - through lack of finances, in grief, in sickness or with other loss - knowing that God will provide will help get us through. He has never left me without anything I have needed and I am sure he never will. Let's trust in God's provision and, like Abraham, develop a great faith in the LORD who provides.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Robert

Gen 22:6,8 Notice the twofold us of ‘both of them together’ so we are left in no doubt that Isaac was willing. But more than that they were in fellowship – agreement – on this matter. Whilst Isaac did not know what was to happen Abraham did and he associated himself with the offering of Isaac., though one is left wondering how Abraham slept on the three day journey knowing what God had called him to do.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

22:16  In saying ‘by myself have I sworn’ God is making the most sure promise. He cannot lie.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

22:3 Abraham may actually have set off ‘early in the morning’ when he had been called to offer Isaac. However rather we are being shown an attitude of mind. A mind which puts the things of God before anything else even when the thing required is unpleasant. Likewise we will show that spirit if we are enthusiastic about being involved in ecclesial activities. Rather than waiting to see if anyone else volunteers to do that unpleasant job we would be quick to offer ourselves.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
22:2 the land of Moriah refers to the mountains of Jerusalem (Moriah means seen of Jah. The specific mountain where Abraham attempted to sacrifice Isaac is not stated.  The distance from Beer-sheba to Jerusalem is about 42 miles (68 km.).  That translated into a three-day journey for Abraham and his party (22:4).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

 

23:1 Sarah was 127 years old when she died. Before the flood, people lived for great ages, some approaching 1000 years. Yahweh was angry with the sinfulness of people, and determined to reduce the human age for life to 120 years (6:3). Sarah's age reminds us of this.

23:2 Kirjath-arba (Kiryat-arba) means either the town of Arba or the town of four. It was founded by one of the giants (Anakim) (Josh 14:15; 15:13). The town could have been named after a giant named Arba, or after him and his three sons Ahiman, Sheshai, and Talmai (see Num 13:22).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

The whole theme of the Bible points to Christ's return to earth and establishment of a new world order:

The promises to David - 2Sam 7:10-16; Luke 1:31-33.

The promises to Abraham - Gen 22:16-18 (Abraham because of his faith will be blessed Acts 3:24-25); Gen 17:19-21 (covenant with Isaac); Gen 12:2,3,7 (will make of Abraham a great nation, promised offspring/seed refering to Christ); Gen 13:14-17 (the land is promised); Gen 15:3-5 (an heir is promised); Heb 11:8-13; Acts 7:1-5 (Abraham and other men of faith died not having received the promises); Acts 2:34 (David not in heaven); Gal 3:6-9,16,24-29 (the law leads us to that promised seed, Christ); 2Pet 1:2-4 (promises were given so believers can be partakers of the divine nature); Acts 1:11 (Christ will return to the earth in like manner as he left); Dan 2:44 (an everlasting kingdom established on earth).


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles
Gen 22:2-13 - Abraham reasoned God could raise the dead Heb 11:17-19;Dan 12:1-2.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles
Gen 22:17;Heb 6:13-14.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

23:15-16 Whilst Abraham paid 400 shekels of silver for a piece of land to bury Sarah David paid Araunah 50 shekels of silver for the threshingfloor and the animals – 2Sam 24:18. We can conclude that the price that Abraham paid was way above the market value of the piece of land he bought. But he did not complain. This is the attitude of a sojourner in a foreign land. He accepts the customs of the land if they do not violate the principles of his beliefs.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

Gen 22:8,13 - God provided a ram for the sacrifice, the lamb would be provided later (John 1:29;Acts 8:32;1Pet 1:19).


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Psalms 26, 27 and 28
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 26 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 27 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 28 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 26 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 27 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 28 online in the New International Version

 

26v.6 - innocency = niqqayown - only here and Gen20:5, Ps.73:13, Hos.8:5 and Amos 4:6(trans. cleanness). The Hosea reference suggests that it is a state which can be obtained by turning away from idolatry. Hos.8:4-6. As David described in one of yesterday's Psalms (24:3-6).
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
27v.11 - a plain path is a path on the plain - in the most desirable areas - the word (miyshowr - 04334) is used elsewhere mainly in this context, but is also translated 'righteous' and 'upright', so we have a vision of the kingdom here for the person to whom God teach his ways.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Psa 26 - This is a very challenging Psalm. How many of us are able to speak like this to our God?

27:4 David's desire to dwell in the house of the Lord was partially fulfilled when he 2 Samuel 7:18 'sat before the Lord'. David had his heart's desire granted because he was a man after God's own heart.

28:3 The duplicity exhibited by the wicked is the same as having 'divers weights' [Deuteronomy 25:13] which is something the Lord hates Proverbs 20:10, 23. Of course one does not have to be a shop keeper to have divers weights. We all have divers weights when we say one thing and do another.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Psalm 26:10 - "In whose hands is mischief, and their right hand is full of bribes" - Margin: "filled with." The word here rendered "bribes" means properly "a gift," or "present;" and then, a gift offered to a judge to procure an unjust sentence.  The general meaning is that the Psalmist did not desire to be identified either with men who openly committed crime, or with those who could be corrupted in the administration of justice. How different is the picture in this Psalm to the picture painted in Psalm 24:4, where the one who dwells in the Holy Hill of Zion has "clean hands and a pure heart." When our lives are consumed with the pursuit of politics, either in the workplace, or our place of worship, then it is impossible to treat people equally, and with the magnanimity that our live in Christ prescribes.
 
Psalm 26:12 - "My foot standeth in an even place" - The word rendered "even place" - means properly "righteousness," or "justice;" then, "evenness, a level region, a plain:" The idea is, that David was standing now on smooth and level ground; that is, he had found now a level road where he might walk securely.  His life was like a journey over a rough and dangerous road - a road of hills and valleys - of rocks and ravines. Walking with God he has found a smooth and safe path. The way was level. He felt secure; and he walked calmly and safely along, as a traveller does who has past over dangerous passes and who finds himself at last on level ground. This theme occurs over and over throughout the Psalms.
 
Psalm 27:12 - "...for false witnesses are risen up against me, and such as breathe out cruelty" - To "breathe out injustice" would imply that those who do so are full of such malignity, as Saul of Tarsus was before his conversion - Acts 9:1. Those who "breathe out injustice" wish to be in control of others, for they are not in control of themselves. Our Lord was in total control of Himself, and He only ever breathed out the Spirit of "wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD" - Isaiah 11:2. What spirit do we breathe out? Are we in control of ourselves? Or do we seek to control others by issuing and supporting edicts designed to this end:- that by controlling others, rather than ourselves, we retain the power?
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

26:12 So David sees that the ecclesia is the place to be when there are problems
for that is what the ‘congregation’ is.

27:2 David speaks in the past tense of his enemies. They ‘came’ – so David now speaks to his God after his deliverance. How often do we thin to thank and praise God when He had delivered us from a problem we have had?

28 - in this Psalm David highlights his complete dependence upon his God. Whilst he does not want to go the way of sinners bur realises that unless God hears his prayers and responds to them he will fall. How often do we feel that we are in control of our own destiny? If we do think like that we forget our dependence upon our Father.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Psalm 27  A bold statement of David's confidence in God, combined with a humble prayer for strength, when life becomes difficult and threatened.

Psalm 28  This Psalm was probably written when David's life was endangered at the rebellion of Absolom, and when the Kingdom of Israel was under great strain.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
Psa 26  This Psalm is a statement of David's past and present intention to walk in God's Truth, also it is a prayer for the preservation of his life.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Psa 27:5  For in the time of trouble he shall hide me in his pavilion:  The word pavilion in Hebrew is succah which means booth.  This passage echoes Succot, the feast of booths (Lev 23:39-43).  This feast was established by the Lord as a remembrance of the Israelites' deliverance from Egypt.  In deliverance, the Lord's hid (sheltered) them from harm.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
28:4 - This is not the language of passion or revenge. It is a prophecy that there will certainly come a day, when God will punish every man who persists in his evil deeds. 5:10, 59:12-13, 69:22-24
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Psa 27:1 gives an almost all-round picture of God filling David's life. God is his light - giving him the ability to see where he is going; God is his salvation - providing his certain hope for the future; and God is his strength, or his fortress - his safety and protection.  We don't need anything else, if we can echo David's words.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

In giving due praise to God, and in an expression of his desire to serve the Lord, David offers this statement:

"LORD, I have loved the habitation of Your house, And the place where your glory dwells." (Psa 26:8).

Of all people in scripture, David was the best placed to sincerely praise God in this way.  David did love the house of God... or would have, had it been built!  What a strange statement for David to make. How could David love the house of God if it wasn't there yet? How could David say he loved the place where God's glory dwelt, when that glory did not appear until the time of his son? (26:8, 2Kin 8:10-11).

In Psalm 27 David continues his theme. Here we see in v4-5 that he sought to dwell in the house of God. In v5 he declares that God will hide him in that place, and save him from trouble. But since when has God's temple been a refuge?  How could David take refuge in an unbuilt house! What's more, in 26:8 we read that he had been there, and he had loved inhabiting it.

In 1Chron 17:1-8 we have the request of David that he might build God a house. The reply of God was "haven't I always been with you anyway?" The comment on this in Acts 7:46-49 is "the Most High does not dwell in temples made with hands".  We, like David, can forget that God's concern is not with material things, but with spiritual. God's dwelling place is in heavenly places, and not in earthly.  So how had David dwelt with God?  Every time David was in trouble, he put his trust in God.  His faith and hope was in God.  In God.  David's salvation was in God, and none other.  His trust was in heavenly things and not earthly.  David lived in faith.  He lived in faith in God.  Notice the underlining?

A reading of 27:1-6 shows us that whenever David was in trouble, he fled for refuge in God. It is this that is defined as dwelling in the house of the LORD. God himself is a refuge. Our trust in Him is a concrete and solid thing. The bunker or tower that is God is more real, more impenetrable, more un-assailable than anything earthly. When one trusts in the Lord that safety is so sure and so complete that one is actually in a heavenly tower, house, or habitation.  V5 "He shall hide me in His pavilion".  It is by faith that one enters into that house.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Rob

26:5   What is our feelings about those who work evil? Do we watch what they do on the Television? Do we associate with them in their activities thinking that we will not be affected by their actions because we are ‘strong’?

 

27:2-4   David had been encompassed by his enemies. We might be forgiven for expecting him to desire to be delivered from them. But no, David saw deliverance as being in God’s temple. The reason? God’s enemies do not go there so one is safe in His presence!

 

28:1     David’s concern is that his fellowship with his God might be destroyed – that he might not hear God’s word. Whilst our Father does not speak directly to us He does speak to us through His word. Failing to ‘listen’ to Him by reading will have as it’s consequence that we will not hear him and lose contact with Him completely.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

27:8 David desired to be in God’s house. He was granted his request – 1Chron 17:16 - it was because he responded to God’s call to him ‘seek ye my face’


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

26:3   David, recognising God’s ‘loving-kindness’ in his life is moved to walk ‘in thy truth’. How often does our appreciation of what He has done for us cause us to modify our actions?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

26:2 In saying ‘Examine ... and prove me’ David is asking for God to chasten him. He is not making some arrogant claim that God will not find any fault in him,


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

26:1 The word integrity is misunderstood and misused in the modern world. People today use it to suggest that the one who has it is a good person. But, the standard of good is a worldly one which falls far short of the divine standard. Actually, integrity means honesty. If one is honest in keeping stated principles, ideals, or goals, then that person has integrity. But, this can have negative applications also. For example, if one believes that robbing people is o.k. (amoral) and participates fully in that activity, then he is honest to his beliefs - he has integrity. In v.1, the word integrity comes from the Hebrew tom which carries an understanding of completeness while denoting a sense of innocence. This shows that David fully worshipped Yahweh while maintaining avoidance of wrongdoing.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

 

28:5 Today, most people do not recognize Yahweh, nor give credence to His creative wonders.  They are only interested in their worldly activities (28:4).  They have no future.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
The being taken up by God when forsaken by family, accused by false witnesses and repaying evil for good reminds us of what Christ endured - Psa 27:10,12;35:11-12;Matt 26:60-61;Mark 14:55-61.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

26:6 In saying that he has washed his hands in innocency David is saying that he is not guilty of the blood of any dead man, appealing to the language of Deut 21:6 where the elders of the city declare their position about a dead body found near to their city.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

26:2  reins literally means kidneys.  The word survives in modern english in the word renal - the renal unit is where you would go for treatment to your kidneys.  The ESV translates the second part of the verse as test my heart and mind, conveying the idea of trying the whole being.

26:3 David walked in truth, v12 he stood in an even, (i.e. a safe place - contrast with v1) and he declined to sit with the vain (v4), or the wicked (v5).  Compare with a similar progression found in Psa 1

26:6  I will wash my hands - compare with the actions of Pilate in Matt 27:24 


Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken

27:12 is clearly Messianic.  Virtually the same words occur in Mark 14:57


Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken
Reading 3 - Matthew  14
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Matthew 14 online in the King James Version
Listen to Matthew 14 online in the New International Version

 

v.31 - I'm sure I would have been just like Peter. So where should we turn to try to dispel our doubts and build our faith? Try these passages. Ps.138:7, Isa.63:12, Mark 11:23, Jas.1:6-8 (faith is single-minded) or back with Abraham in Gen.22:14
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
John the Baptist had said of Jesus 'He must increase, but I must decrease.' [John 3:30]. The death of John is only referred to here incidentally to explain Herod's perplexity. Thus John passed off the scene with no mention - demonstrating the ascendancy of Jesus against the background of John's decrease.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:3-12 The account of the death of John recounts events which had happened earlier. They are included here to provide an explanation of Herod's unease about Jesus. As such we see that Herod was both superstitious and had a high regard for John.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Matthew 14:3 - What a record of contrasts this is. Herod was an immoral man, an adulterer - John was upright before God, and a eunuch. Herod locked John in prison - John, by his great message, would have set Herod free of his imprisoning lusts.
 
Matthew 14:8 - It was the custom to release one from prison on occasions such as this - not behead one!
 
Matthew 14:9 - "And the king was sorry: nevertheless for the oath's sake, and them which sat with him at meat, he commanded it to be given her" - Herod was prepared to honour a boastful oath delivered in an inebriated state, but he could not honour his marriage oath, undertaken in sobriety and before God.
 
Matthew 14:21 - "And they that had eaten were about five thousand men, beside women and children" - This information here, would allow us to calculate that our Lord fed upwards of 20,000 mouths on this day. Why only five thousand men numbered then? This whole incident was a feast of Grace, and perhaps we are being told here that this bountiful meal, which took place exactly twelve months before His crucifixion, prefigured the work that would ultimately be accomplished in a vast multitude - the Family of Grace named later by Paul as the Commonwealth of Israel - Ephesians 2:12. This record of feeding 5,000 families, is one of the few miracles recorded in detail by all four Gospel writers.
 

 

                                  CONTRASTS

  BETWEEN

 

HEROD'S BIRTHDAY PARTY

CHRIST FEEDING 5,000 FAMILIES

 

Unlawful Wife/Adulterer

 

Bride in Prospect/Eunuch

 

Palace of Macchaerus

 

Green Mountain Slope

 

Shore of Dead Sea

 

Shore of Galilee Sea

 

Feast of Hatred

 

Feast of Love

 

Immoral Party

 

Frugal Meal

 

Rich & Influential

 

Poor & Insignificant

 

Herod “The Fox” - Adulterer

 

Christ “The Harmless” - Pure

 

Egotistical Offer

 

Divine Principles

 

Drunken Stupor

 

Sweet Fellowship

 

Feast of Death

 

Feast of Life

 

Head on a Plate at the end of party

 

12 Baskets of Bread left at end of meal

 

 

 

 

 
If any wish to pursue a fuller study of this greatest of incidents recorded of our Lord, I am happy to e-mail a copy of a short study entitled "He Gave Them Bread From Heaven To Eat."  Send your request to the link below or click here to read it on line.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
:4 - Like his 'predecessor' Elijah, John too had to stand before the King and speak words of condemnation. e.g. 1Kings 21:17-19
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
14:2 That Herod spoke to his servants about Jesus maybe explains, partly, why Chuza’s steward’s wife (Luke 8:3) ministered unto Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Matt 14:28-31 It is certainly comforting to know that if we cry out to the LORD to be saved as Peter did here, to know that Christ is there with His hands stretched out to catch us as we fall. 

Matt 14:36  This is the second time in the past few days that we have read of the sick reaching out to touch the hem of Christ's garment to be made perfectly whole.( The woman with the issue of blood) Matt 9:20-22


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.6 The name of the Herodias' daughter is not mentioned but Josephus suggests it is Salome.  She and her famous Dance of the Seven Veils have become popularized in the art world.
 
V.36 Touching the hem of Christ's garment was sufficient for healing.  The example of the woman diseased with an issue of blood also comes readily to mind (Matt 9:20-22).  The Greek word translated hem is kraspedon and implies a border or fringe. 

Malachi also makes reference to this when he talks of Christ: But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall (Mal 4:2).

The word, wings in Hebrew is kanaph which means extremity or edge, particularly of a garment, and thus a hem.  Kraspedon is equivalent to kanaph

Israelites had to wear blue on the borders (kanaph) of their garments (Num 15:38).  This color represents heaven, the throne of Yahweh, from whence emanates all commandment and power.  Thus, the heavenly power to heal is embodied in the blue border of the garment.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
v.15-20 Here we have an incident that not only showed the wonder of God's power and Jesus' ability to wield it, but also set up a deputation of the Scribes and Pharisees in the next chapter (see tomorrow's comment). On many occasions Jesus went out of his way to antagonise the Pharisees and show them up for what they were.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.31 We have a strong exhortation for each one of us in this verse. Not only do we have the comfort of knowing that our master is always there to assist us when we ask, but also we can see the responsibility we all have to help our Brethren and Sisters when they cry out for help. We have to ask ourselves, are we always there, and are we always willing to help, regardless of what the need may be?
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

14:13-14          On hearing of the death of John Jesus must have considered what fate awaited him. This might explain why he sought solitude. However, when he saw the multitudes, he ministered to them. How often do we ignore our brethren and sister's needs when we are in distress? Jesus didn't.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
V.31 Strictly speaking it would not have been necessary for Jesus to reach out his hand to rescue Peter. A simple command would have been enough. Reaching out to assist Peter would have proven more reassuring. Peter would also felt his master's love also.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
a) First of all, a little point for Sunday School teachers. (See Matt 14:15-21).  Think of this sum:
5     thousand people
5     loaves
2     fishes. Add these together
= 12  baskets of food left over!  This makes an easy way for children (and adults) to remember the parable.
b) Even Jesus Christ needed quiet, personal time. At the death of John the Baptist, He wanted to be quiet, (Matt 14:12-14). He knew that this spoke of His Own death.  But when He saw the great multitude of people He put His own feelings behind Him, and had compassion on the people, and healed them. He really was a lovely Man.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

Matt 14:29 - "Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore"

Only Matthew records this incident, and it was a valuable lesson to learn: With the power of Christ, they could do the impossible.


Peter Dulis [toronto west]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
22-27 In these few verses we once again have a lesson which can be applied to our lifes. The disciples appear to be left on there own, Christ has left them (physically) and gone up the mountain to pray. During this time a storm came up, and the twelve were affraid. Christ has also left each one of us in a physical sense, we all have faced a storm of one sort, where we were affraid. We must always remember, like Peter, if we cry out, our pleas will not go unheard. What a wonderful blessing!
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

14 There is a powerful contrast between the end of Matthew 13 and the beginning of this chapter. Matthew Matt 13:56-58 shows Jesus’ countrymen in unbelief. So he did not ‘many mighty works’. Here we see, by contrast, Herod the Idumean, looking at the work of Jesus, from a distance, and concluding that something special was happening!


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
DEGREES OF FAITH
 
There were three different levels of faith noted in the account of the walking on the water episode.
 
 Jesus walked on water, not just a few steps, but a considerable distance from the land out to where the disciples had rowed the boat. His was an act of pure faith. Jesus had no doubt and trusted totally in God.
 
Peter walked on water. He had called out to Jesus from the boat, "Lord, if it's you, tell me to come to you on the water." (Matt 14:28) While Peter had his eyes on Jesus, he had all the faith he needed to walk on the water and he walked toward Jesus. "But when he saw the wind he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, "Lord, save me." (v.30) After Jesus had saved him, he said to Peter, "You of little faith, why did you doubt?" (v.31)
 
Eleven other disciples did not walk on water. They had faith in Jesus, but they also had faith in the boat. They were not prepared to put their faith in Jesus to the test by getting out of the boat.
 
Peter was reproved for his lack of faith compared to the faith of Jesus. Yet had he looked at it another way, he could have been proud that he had more faith than the other eleven
 
Sometimes we might show more faith than those around us, just like Peter did. But at those times let's remember that our faith should be compared to the faith of Jesus, not to the faith of the people around us. Compared to Jesus, there is always room to grow.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert

14:1-2 Herod, on hearing about Jesus’ miracles, slips into superstition rather than wishing to enquire more about Jesus’ works.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

UNDER RESOURCED

 

Everyone has needs that have to be met. Sometimes God brings people with needs far greater than anything we could ever imagine being able to deal with. Yet in some way God anticipates us being able to help out with meeting those needs somehow. We are told that "We are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." (Eph 2:10) So when opportunities, problems or people with needs come knocking at our door, they are probably one of the good works God has prepared for us to do.

 

The disciples of Jesus faced a huge need. It was far greater than they could ever imagine coping with. They were surrounded by perhaps ten or twenty thousand people who were all hungry. The local fast food shop was not prepared for an order that big, and neither did the disciples have the money to pay for it. But Jesus had said, "They do not need to go away. You give them something to eat." (Matt 14:16)

 

Realising how unprepared they were for the challenge of such huge proportions, they apologetically said to Jesus, "We have here only five loaves of bread and two fish." (v.17) This small offering was given to Jesus. With a great miracle their offering was enough to fill the need.

 

We may not feel we have much to offer either, but whatever we have to offer can be increased immeasureably with the blessing of God in the hands of Jesus. Let us not give up when we are faced with needs seemingly greater than what we can cope with. Instead let us give what we have and let God's blessing do the rest.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Robert

14:1 Herod’s ‘he is risen from the dead’ provides a valuable insight into the mind of this man. He had already recognised that John was a good man and had sought to hear his message, even when he was in prison. Mark 6:20 Now here is an indication that he believed in the resurrection – though his belief was rather muddled.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Two evening events took place: the feeding of the multitude (v.15); and later when Jesus went up a mountain to pray (v.23). The word for evening in Greek is opsios. There are two meanings for opsios: late afternoon and nightfall. Clearly, the first evening event was late afternoon (3 p.m. or later). The second evening event was nightfall (about 6 p.m.). The night was divided into four watches: (1) 6 - 9 p.m. (2) 9 p.m. - Midnight (3) Midnight - 3 a.m. (4) 3 - 6 a.m. And so, we see that Jesus walked on the sea sometime between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. (v.25).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

There are various similarities between John the Baptist and Samson, not least of which is the way they died. Both of these men died because of scheming women. See in v6-8 how much planning must have gone in to this public show of John's death. In v3 it appears that it was Herodias who asked for John's imprisonment in the first place (Mark 6:19-20 makes this clear).

So Herod appears blameless of John's death. Or was he? His rash oath caused John's death, and his pride didn't allow him to overule this oath "because of those who sat with him" (v9). We should be careful what we say, because we can never take back what proceeds from our mouth (James 3:5-6).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

14:14  It is easy to take it for granted that Jesus was ‘moved with compassion’. However this attitude was not common amongst the religious leaders. There were not above using the sick to try to trap Jesus. Jesus’ behaviour manifested the attitude of the true shepherd which contrasted with the false shepherds that the leaders were.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter