|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.20.
Why is this verse acceptable to God? Surely here Jacob commits a sin - Ex.20:7,
Job 13:7. He tells a lie, and he even implicates God in that lie. The only
answer is that was God's will that the deed be perpetrated - based entirely on
the knowledge given to Rebekah in Gen.25:23,
which, it would seem from today's chapter, was not revealed to Isaac. God works
in mysterious ways. I would also ask whether these things were actually necessary
in order to fulfil Gen.25:23. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.29,30
- Surely the only way Isaac could have know this was by divine revelation, and
yet we have no record of him asking God for this information. What Isaac says
here is a prohecy. I am inclined to wonder how many times in scripture this happens. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 27:44 Rebekah's comment that Esau's wrath would depart when he 'forgot' what Jacob had done provides a valuable insight into the way in which Esau thought. He was only concerned with the here and now. Consequently the promises meant little. A powerful lesson for ourselves. If we are wrapped up in the things of this life then the things of the kingdom will be of little value to us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :16
The way that Jacob wore the animal skin to deceive Isaac is the basis for Zechariah
13:4 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Genesis
27:1 - "And it came to pass" - One
of the most comforting little phrases in the whole of scripture is this one
that occurs some 457 times throughout scripture. Happily nothing "comes
to stay" in this veil of tears. John tells us in his 1st Epistle,
that "the
world passeth away," or as Paul put it so well in 2nd Corinthians
- "For which cause we faint not; but though our outward man perish,
yet the inward man is renewed day by day. For our light affliction,
which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight
of glory; While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things
which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things
which are not seen are eternal." This whole chapter in Genesis
is about a man who could not see [literally], but who ended up seeing the eternal
things as they ought to be seen.
"When
Isaac was old" - Isaac is 117yo in this record, and he still had
63 years left to live. His sons are both 57yo - Esau had acquired two wives
around age 40, but Jacob is still a bachelor. The family thought that Isaac
was terminally ill, and that he could die at any time.
Genesis
27:5,6 - "Isaac spoke to Esau his son" + "Rebekah spoke to Jacob
her son" - Here is a real family tragedy. Isaac's household
is dysfunctional. Not only has his son Esau married out of the Faith,
husband and wife have clear favourites - and the boys know it!
Genesis
27:43 - "Now therefore my son, obey my voice" - Each time Jacob
obeyed the voice of his mother [at age 57] instead of relying on his Father
in heaven, he got himself into deep trouble. Rebekah paid for this lack of faith,
in that this is the last time she sees her son, for she died whilst Jacob was
with her brother Laban. For Jacob - he simply ran away from a "red serpent"
[Esau] into the wiles of a "white serpent" [his Uncle Laban].
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
| ch. 27 - We see (25:28) the way that Isaac and Rebekah each had their own favourite son. This favouritism spills over and is seen here (27:1) ‘his’ (27:6) ‘her son’ (27:8) ‘my sons’ Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Were Esau’s clothes the family’s priestly garments? He had no need of them, so they were kept in his mother’s tent. If this is so, then the "smell of a field" (v27) = incense David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| Gen 27:2 Each one of us, like Issac, "know not the day of our death." We must live our lifes accordingly; tomorrow could see the return of our absent King. This struck home two weeks ago, a brother was at the meeting on Sunday morning. The next morning we received a phone call saying he had been hit by a car, and that now he is sleeping awaiting the return of the Lord. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Yahweh knows the beginning and end of all things, and all things are accomplished according to His plan. However, He does not allow persons or nations to contravene His moral laws in carrying out His will. Jacob lied and deceived his father. Later we shall see how he himself was lied to and was deceived in the matter of Leah. Yahweh requires the books to be balanced (consider Prov 11:1, Matt 7:2). Is it not better to have our books balanced now rather than to have them balanced at the judgement? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| v.1 - This dimness of eyes, one might assume, was something which came upon all in days before corrective lenses could be employed, and, although Ecc 12:3 supports this overall view, we read only of three people specifically with this complaint in old age - Isaac (here), Jacob (48:10) and Eli (1Sam 3:2) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
27:1,6 Notice the tension. Esau was ‘his’ son whereas Jacob was ‘her son’ Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The world would condemn the treatment of Esau as being unfair. In this day and age, an Esau would be off to human rights court pleading his case, and he would be recompensed. However, Yahweh does not think as humans do (Isa 55:9). To be clear we understand the position of Yahweh, it is recommended to read Paul's explanation on the matter (Rom 9:10-21). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Heb 11:20 reads "By faith Issac blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come." Yet the record in Genesis makes it quie clear that Issac intended to bless the wrong son. The explanation can be seen in what follows. When the deception was discovered, Issac did not vent his anger on Jacob as might be expected, but "trembled exceedingly" (V.33) It is obvious that Issac knew he was in error, and although he wanted to bless Esau, he accepted that Jacob was the one whom God had chosen. God had overridden Jacob's natural desires. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Gen 27:6 The family tension is emphasised further when Rebekah, speaking to Jacob, refers to Esau as "thy brother" thus avoiding recognition that he is her son. Graeme Rudland [Crewe (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Graeme |
||||||||||
| Heb 11:20 would indicate the faith of Isaac in the matter of the blessing. It can be seen that he only mentions the promises to Abraham in Gen 28:4, and at this time he specifically knows that he is blessing Jacob. The blessing given in 27:28, 29 is therefore perhaps more general and not specifically related to them, when he thought he was blessing Esau. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
27:27 Whereas the ‘smell of his raiment’ was deceptive in Song 4:11 the bride groom delights in the smell of the bride. Is our odour deceptive or beautiful? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
27:33 We should conclude that Isaac ‘trembled very exceedingly’ because he realised that if it had not been for the deception he would have gone against what he knew was God’s will because of the comment made in Gen 25:33 to Rebekah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
It was thought that Isaac was near to death at this time (although he did live a good deal longer afterwards). However, the circumstance hastened Isaac to want to render the blessing of the firstborn. Rebekah had known, before she gave birth, that Jacob would rule over Esau (25:22,23). She had undoubtedly shared this knowledge with her favorite child as he grew up. Panicked into plotting deception to secure Yahweh's promise, she had no trouble in eliciting the help of her well-informed son. Yahweh was not pleased with their actions. Rebekah would suffer the consequences by dying without ever seeing Jacob again. Payback time for Jacob would come in Laban's deception of him over Leah. The moral consideration is: The will of Yahweh shall always be done. But, nobody has the right to nudge circumstances to make that happen if their actions contravene Yahweh's morality. The ends do not justify the means. Rebekah and Jacob lacked faith at this time. The lesson for us is to have faith and trust Yahweh. Rest in the LORD, and wait patiently for him (Psa 37:7). He will accomplish all. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
27:16-17 Jacob was a deceiver and it seems that he may have learnt the trick from his mother! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.15 In the Ancient Near East, it was the custom that a father hands down a special robe to his firstborn son. This is Esau's goodly raiment that Rebekah took as part of her plan of deception. The special garment would be kept in a box filled with flowers and herbs of the field such as lavender and thyme. Sometimes whole sprigs of aromatic plants were put in. Not only would these make the garment smell pleasant, but worms would be prevented from damaging the robe. The beautiful aroma of meadow flowers and herbs was the smell of a field that Isaac experienced (v.27). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Gen 27:43 - Laban [(3837) means "white" and is derived from a word meaning to make bricks] may suggest a person who appeared pure but was earthly. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
27:35 Whilst Esau here is concerned that the ‘blessing’ has been taken from him clearly this was a short term issue for him because when Jacob meets Esau later – Gen 33:11 – even though Jacob is concerned to make the point that he is giving Esau a blessing he is not really that interested in receiving it. He is wealthy so the things of God were of little value to him now. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
I know there is a thought that there are two blessings given the first born, the double portion (the birthright) and the blessing. I believe this is may be a view developed to try and forgive Isaac for giving Esau the blessing when he had sold the birthright. But no condemnation comes God upon Jacob that I know of. It could be Jacob was taking what was rightfully his. Esau was condemned for despising his birthright, Jacob had every right to it. This does not excuse the method use though but the punishment came upon Rebeccah. When she heard that Esau planned to kill Jacob she plans to send Esau to Laban and it says at v. "44And tarry with him a few days, until thy brother's fury turn away; 45Until thy brother's anger turn away from thee, and he forget that which thou hast done to him: then I will send, and fetch thee from thence: why should I be deprived also of you both in one day? In the end she was deprived for there is no record that she ever saw Jacob again. Could this have been the punishment for her deception of her husband. Alex Browning [Toronto East, Canada] Comment added in 2010 reply to Alex |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v5.
- The acknowledgement of our sin - and, it would appear, the declaration of it
- brings about forgiveness. Ps.38:18,
51:3-5. Recognition of sin in ourselves is fundamental to our position in
Christ 1John
1:8-10. Public confession
of sin is also called for - at baptism Mark
1:5 - but also as an
on-going policy Jas.5:16,
Col.3:9. Now there's a thought. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
2 - Strongs gives the following meanings for the word here translated 'guile'
- laxness, slackness, slackening, deceit, treachery. This word (r@miyah
07423) occurs only 15 times, and is only translated guile here. Here
are all of them: deceitful - Psa.78:57, 120:2, Hos.7:16, Mic.6:12 deceitfully - Job 13:7, Psa.52:2, Jer.48:10 deceit - Job 27:4, Psa.101:7 slothful - Prov.12:24,27 false - Psa.120:3 guile - here idle - Prov.19:15 slack - Prov.10:4 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| David is 'the
man [v1]
whose sins have been forgiven after he had committed adultery with Bathsheba.
Paul says [Romans
4:6-8] that we are blessed in the same way in that our sins can be forgiven
also. Thus David's repentance and God's subsequent forgiveness forms a pattern
of forgiveness to those who repent and are baptised. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm
32 - is
a "Maschil" or "instruction or teaching" Psalm written by David as
a public declaration revealing how God had dealt with his sin with Bathsheba.
David speaks of his "iniquity, transgression and sin" [v1,2,5]
and instructs us as to how Exodus
34:6-7 really works - see also Micah
7:18-20. David had held out on God for nigh on 12 months [v3]
but he had suffered terrible traumas of conscience during that time that took
their toll on him both physically and mentally and emotionally. It is not until
he confesses his sin to God that God can deal with it, hence David's appeal [v9]
"to
be ye not as the mule" - dumb, stupid and stubborn. The lesson? Do
not hold out on God! He knows all - and the sooner He knows that you know He
knows, and contritely ask Him to deal with the problem in His righteousness
- the better off we are! We cannot deal with sin by hiding it from God. Reveal
our weaknesses to Him, and His strength can then be made perfect in weakness
- 2
Corinthians 12:9.
Finally,
what a contrast in this Psalm [v2]
to Jacob in our first reading, who was full of guile and deceit. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
| Psalm
32:11 RSV: "Be glad in the Lord, and rejoice, O righteous, and shout
for joy, all you upright in heart!". The French Bible (Segond version) says: "Just/True (it's imperative) delight in the Lord (Hebrew Bible Yahweh) and be in liveliness! Push/Urge/ Exhort (2nd imperative) cries of joy, all you who are Loyal/Upright of heart!". Imperatives give a sense of urgency, as an example of a child who is about to put its hand on a hot surface, the mother commands "stop" she hasn't time to say a full sentence: "Don't do that you'll get burned". The title: "Lord" in English language Bibles is often translated in the Hebrew language Bibles as: "Yahweh". Young's Bible concordance translates "Yahweh" as "he who shall be(come)". In the English sense one thinks of "Lord" as a title, whereas Yahweh has more meaning, and could it be, that it is a reference to the time when He will send His Son, Jesus Christ to redeem that which Adam lost? One dictionary in the French language says: "Straight" in the sense of not being bent, can it be implied, that one should not be double minded, James 4:8 says: "Draw near to God and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you men of double mind.". Beryl Butler [London West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Beryl |
||||||||||
| 32:8 David is not suggesting that he is going to instruct God. Rather he has shifted his focus to his subjects and having learnt of God’s forgiveness wants to instruct his subjects about the same matter, by using his own personal experience. How often are we willing to lay bare our innermost embarrassments in order that our brethren and sisters are helped? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 32 In this Psalm we see the necessity to confess our sins to God in order to receive His forgiveness. David on this occasion is probably referring to his affair with Bethsheba. Psa 32:7 God was David's hiding place, we must all hide in God, using Him as a cover to preserve us from our troubles. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Sins are forgiven but there can be consequences. David was forgiven his transgression with Bathsheba, but their child died (2Sam 12:22,23). David sinned by numbering Israel and a plague ensued (2Sam 24:10-15). Jacob deceived Isaac and was in turn deceived by Laban (see note on Gen. 27). We will be forgiven our sins if we ask with a contrite heart. However, we must be prepared to live with the consequences produced by those sins. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| GUILT Guilt is a terrible thing. To the natural mind guilt should have little effect on us. We think it should be there to give us a brief reminder that we have done wrong, but once that twinge of emotion has passed, we should be able to forget all about it and carry on with life. But it doesn't often work like that. David, presumably after his sin with Bathsheba and his murder of Uriah, felt guilty. Deep down inside he knew that what he had done was wrong but he would not admit it. This is what David said about that period of time: "When I kept silent, my bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. For day and night your hand was heavy upon me; my strength was sapped as in summer." (Psa 32:3-4) I seems that David got sick. He does not seem well at all. His bones wasted away, he groaned all day long and his strength was sapped as if it were a sweltering hot day every day. You or I would be off to the doctor if we had those symptoms. Perhaps we have them. Guilt can make us sick. It can strip us of health, energy, enthusiasm and even love. Feelings of guilt can come out in some very physical ways that we would not even think are related to the guilty feelings. All the doctors or prescriptions in the world will not heal them. There is only one thing to do. Confess our sin to the LORD and ask for his forgiveness. We must make our sin right with both God and with each other. Let's make sure that guilt does not get the better of us, but that we get the better of it by removing sin from our lives. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| v.2 - Here we have the basis of grace - that God will not impute our sins to us - for so are we blessed. Rom 5:13, 2Cor 5:19-21 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| David in this Psalm describes the blessings of his forgiveness, succeeding the pains of conviction, and from his experience relays instuction and exhortation to others. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Forgiveness is a real gift. Sin is like a heavy weight on the shoulders. But when that sin is forgiven, phew! what a relief! (Psa 32:1,2) David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
32:4 In speaking of God’s hand that was ‘heavy upon me’ David is saying that God was chastening him before he repented of his sin with Bathsheba. Isn’t it encouraging that our Father chastens us rather than leaves us to our own devices? He is seeking repentance so that he can forgive us. Chastening is not a vindictive punishment of a harsh God. Rather it is the behaviour of a concerned Father who s seeking to shower blessings on His children. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
v4 God's hand can only be "heavy" on us if we have developed a relationship with Him, and if knowledge of His word, & of His love/grace have honed our consciences. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
32:1-2 In speaking of ‘transgression’, ‘sin’ and ‘iniquity’ David reflects on the character of God – Exo 34:7 and the work of forgiveness in the Day of Atonement – Lev 16:21 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In this Psalm we see that guilt is something that can have a terrible bearing on one's life. It is only the forgiveness which God has offered through His Son, and our Saviour Jesus that can heal the pain. Images of guilt assist us in the appreciation of having our sins forgiven. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
32:3 The ‘roaring’ of this verse echoes David’s despair as voiced in Psa 22:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
A righteous person is not a perfect one. A righteous person commits sin. However, a righteous person is one who recognizes that they sin (either overtly or without realization). They are sorry for their sins (known and unknown) and seek forgiveness. Yahweh is willing to forgive them (vs.1,2). However many times a righteous person sins (and that will happen repeatedly), he or she can be forgiven, as long as the recognition and regret pertain (Prov 24:16). Thus, a righteous person can be joyful in Yahweh for their release (v.11). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
32:5 The past tense ‘I acknowledged my sin ...’ indicates that by the time that Nathan came and told David about his sin and then that God had forgiven him – 2Sam 12:7,13– David had already repented from his sin. Nathan provided him with the opportunity to voice that repentance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Maschil means giving instruction. There are thirteen Psalms that are titled Maschil. They are: 32,42,44,45,52-55,74,78,88,89,142. V.2 Jesus is the only one to whom this verse really applies. We can attain that status if we have our transgression forgiven and our sin covered (v.1). This is possible through the sacrifice of Jesus, the only sinless man. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Psa 32:1-2;Rom 4:4-8. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
32:7 David had been hiding his sin hoping that no one would know. But now, having come to repentance, he sees God’s forgiveness as the place where his sins can be hidden, so to speak Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
There is no-one happier than a sinner who doesn't get their just deserts (1). As long as you're honest about your sin (2). If not, and you try to hide it, God just turns on the thumb screws till you can't stand it (3-4). But when you finally come out in the open and confess, He forgives it all (5). That's why everyone who understands God's way of working, prays to Him straight away (6). And rather than hiding from him like Adam and Eve, they hide with Him and are delivered (7). Let's accept this teaching, and not be stubborn with God when we sin, so He has to drag us to our knees to confess (9). That kind of attitude brings so much heartache. But those who trust that God will forgive, have so much joy in that forgiveness (10-11). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v2.
- the word for shine (lampo) here
is a rarely used one in scripture. It's usage on only 6 occasions is quite instructive.
Twice in Matt.5:15,16.
It is the light that shines from the candlestick - 'giveth light' in
v. 15 and 'shine' in v. 16 - and we learn that we, like the candlestick,
must shine, that those around might see. We shine using the light from Jesus face
- the very shining that was experienced first hand by these disciples on the mount
- 2Cor.4:6.
The same is the power and glory of God - see the use of the word in Acts
12:7. The last use
of the word is in today's chapter and v.24.
It is the light that we look and hope for avidly - the light that 'every eye shall
see'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :22
Here we have a geographical comment about where Jesus and the disciples were.
We learn that they were in Galilee until 19:1
for we are there informed that they left Galilee. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :17 In calling the people a 'faithless and perverse generation' Jesus is quoting Moses' comment to Israel at the end of the wilderness journey (Deuteronomy 32:5) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Mat 17:1 - "After six days" - Mark 9:2 has the same number; but Luke 9:28 says after eight days. The reason for this difference seems to be the following: Matthew and Mark reckon the days from that mentioned in the preceding chapter, to that mentioned in this; Luke includes both days, as well as the six intermediate: hence, the one record makes eight days, the other six, without any contradiction. "A high mountain" - This may be one of the mountains of Galilee; but whether Mount Tabor or not, is uncertain. Some think it was Mount Hermon. Yet others think it was Mt Nebo, and this may be credible as Moses had been buried there, and Elijah had also been taken to that side of Jordan at the conclusion of his mission with Israel. These three men - Moses, Elijah and Jesus ["Joshua"], are all related to an "exodus." Moses brought the Children of Israel out of Egypt - 1 Samuel 12:6. Elijah will bring the nation of Israel out of Catholic Europe - Malachi 4:5-6; Ezekiel 20:33-44. And Jesus has brought us all out of sin and death - 2 Timothy 1:10. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
| :19-20 - we are all limited by our unbelief. Belief - faith - is everything to God. This is the essence of our salvation - Heb 11:6 - Let us be sure that we pray to God to help us in our unbelief that by His grace we might be able to give Him glory for evermore. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 17:1 Peter James and John are singled out for special treatment on a number of occasions Luke 8:51, Mark 13:3, Matt 26:37 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Matt 17:24-27 It is interesting to note that it was only Matthew of the gospel writers ( the tax collecter) that recorded this incident of the tribute money. In his mind it was important enough to record, while with the others it would not have had the same meaning or importance. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
In the vision of the transfiguration, Moses and Elijah are seen together with Jesus. Is not this vision showing Peter, James and John that Moses (the Law) and the Elijah (Prophets) have qualified Jesus as the Messiah? (Luke 16:31). Consistent with this statement, Peter, James, and John were told not to talk of this vision until Jesus had risen (Matt 17:9). Why were Peter, James and John selected to see this vision (and to be present with Christ on other occasions)? Peter was the most prominent of the twelve apostles, and early ecclesial leader; James was the first of the apostles to be martyred; and John was the last remaining apostle. Is this information significant? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
:1 - It seems that there are 3 types of people that will be in the Kingdom, as indicated in v. 1: Peter - preaches(teacher) :4 - Peter may have, without thinking, put Jesus as equal with Moses and Elijah; also he called him Rabbi(see Mark) "not knowing what he had said" (see Luke); he gave Jesus the status of a mere disciple and commentator on the Law and the Prophets. Thus the declaration by God in v.5 - "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him" :10 - Elijah must first come - Why are the scribes quoting Malachi 4? Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Matt |
||||||||||
v.4 - The word for tabernacle <4633> is used of all sorts of aspects of God's dwelling with mankind throughout the New Testament: The tabernacle in the wilderness (Acts 7:44, Heb 8:5, 9:2,6,8,21, 13:11) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
17:1 This chapter should be seen as following on from the previous chapter. The transfiguration is what Jesus was talking about in Matt 16:28. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Jesus was extremely fair and straightforward with His disciples. He warned them how He must be killed, but would rise again the third day (Matt 17:22,23). He did not want them to think, like some of the people did, that He was going to be king straightaway. They were “exceeding sorry”, but still stayed with Him.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
||||||||||
| I agree with Peter Forbes about chapter 17 continuing the end of 16:28 - perhaps the some (Peter, James, and John?) standing there who will not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom refers to those three seeing the transfiguration of 17:1,2,3,5 which appears to be almost a preview of Christ's coming to earth to establish the kingdom. Thus the three had a glimpse/preview before their deaths of the kingdom. This would have encouraged these three (and other's they later told) for the challenges that lied ahead and perhaps it even encouraged Christ for his coming ordeal. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
17:2 The high mountain was probably Mount Tabor as Jesus had been in Caesarea Philippi recently _ Matt 16:13. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The transfirguration was a glimpse of the Kingdom of God as seen by 7 beings: God, the Lord Jesus Christ, Moses, Elijah, Peter, James and John, after six days (hence the 7th day). 7 is the number of perfection. In Rom 3:21 maybe Paul is referring to this occasion: "righteousness of God without the law is manifested" - CHRIST "being witnessed by the law" - MOSES, "and the prophets" - ELIJAH
Jon Davies [Coventry West, UK] Comment added in 2007 reply to Jon |
||||||||||
17:5 The phrase ‘in whom I am well pleased’ is a quotation from Isa 42:1 confirming that Isaiah is speaking of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The LORD is the King of heaven (Dan 4:37). He is sovereign: the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes (Dan 4:25). Jesus is His Son and king of Israel (John 1:49). As such, He should not have had to pay taxes (vs.25,26). However, Jesus instructed Peter to pay tax (v.27). He will claim His throne when He returns to earth. Following His example, we pay taxes and obey all civic laws that do not conflict with Christ's commands. We are biding our time until the Kingdom. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
17:2 The shining of Jesus’ face echoes that of Moses – Exo 34:29. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
If you were introducing your son, a prince, to his future subjects, and you only had one thing to say, what would it be? Look after him? Respect him? Stick with him? Serve him? God said one thing about Jesus on the Mountain, and it was "listen to him!". How strange. But God has a long memory, and He was merely carrying on a conversation He had with His people centuries before. At mount Sinai God wanted to teach them about Himself so that they could be His people. But it all went wrong. They were so afraid of God they cried out: "let not God speak with us, lest we die!". In effect they were saying: "God is so vindictive, and we are so sinful, that He's bound to kill us as soon as look at us!". The only solution to this deplorable situation was to provide someone who could tell them everything God wanted them to hear, yet in a non threatening way. God needed to show that He was really a loving, caring, gracious Father rather than some angry vindictive despot. He also needed to show them that forgiveness and mercy were always available. Only then would He be able to get His original message accross. In Exo 20:19 Israel asked for Moses to speak to them instead of God, and in granting their request God said... ( Exo 19:5-9 > Exo 20:18-21 > Deut 18:15-19 > Matt 17:5 > Heb 1:1-3 > 12:18-25 ) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
17:15 If Israel were faithful ‘fire’ and ‘water’ would not be a threat to them – Isa 43:2. So this child represents Israel who, because they are astray from God, were unable to experience the promise that Isaiah gave. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||