January 2

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Genesis  3 and 4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Genesis 3 online in the King James Version Listen to Genesis 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to Genesis 3 online in the New International Version Listen to Genesis 4 online in the New International Version

 

A quick look at the word subtil (ch.3 v. 1). It is only translated subtil here, but there are 10 other occurrences elsewhere in the OT of the hebrew word 'aruwm'. They fit 2 specific categories. It is used by Eliphaz twice in his speeches to Job - translated crafty. Here the context seems similar to Gen 3. Job 5:12, 15:5. However, when we turn to the final 8 occurrences they are all in Proverbs, and used in just the opposite context - of a good characteristic rather than a bad - translated prudent. If you don't want to look up all 8 of these, look especially at the last two (which are identical) and consider in the context of Gen. 3. Proverbs 12:16,23, 13:16, 14:8,15,18, 22:3, 27:12.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
ch.4:26 - The name Enos means 'frailty'. It was a demonstration of Seth's understanding of the position of man before God, and the result of this realisation was that this family then 'began to call upon the name of the Lord'. Our humility, which is required for salvation, can only come from a true recognition of the frailty we have when compared with the Lord God Almighty. Hence Seth's choice of name was not an act of pessimism or discouragement, it was an act of recognition of the way to salvation.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
3:7 The opening of the eyes of Adam and Eve caused confusion and distress whereas the opening of the eyes of the two on the road to Emmaus [Luke 24:31] caused joy and enlightenment.

Clearly the gospel record is wishing us to see this contrast by using the same language.

4:24 The way that Lamech claims that if Cain were avenged 'sevenfold' he would be avenged 'seventy and sevenfold' forms the basis for Jesus' words [Matthew 18:22] where he turns the issue round and says that, rather than seeking vengeance seventy seven times forgiveness should be shown to that extent.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

MASTERING SIN

It all began with one small wrong act that Cain was very able to put right. Cain offered a sacrifice of vegetables instead of the sacrifice of an animal and then became jealous that Abel's sacrifice was favoured by God while his own sacrifice wasn't. It was here that the LORD intervened and warned Cain what would happen if he did not put his actions right. God said, "Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at the door; it desires to have you, but you must master it." (Genesis 4 v 7).

Cain's decision was to stay bitter. To ease his problem, Cain made a bigger one by killing his brother. Now Cain had two problems. He had offered an unacceptable sacrifice and not put it right, and had murdered his brother.

When the LORD confronted Cain about the death of Abel, he again tried to cover it up by lying. "Where is your brother Abel?" the LORD asked. "I don't know," Cain replied, "Am I my brothers keeper?"

If Cain had just taken God's advice and put the first problem right, the rest of his sins would never have happened.

Sin desires to have all of us, but we must master it. Let us not fall into the same trap as Cain and add sin to sin until it masters us.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
3:6 That Eve 'saw' 'the fruit which was 'pleasant' and 'took' it is reflected in the way that the sons of God 'saw' the daughters of men who were 'fair' and so they 'took' them It is not just Eve who had problems with her vision. So did the 'sons of God' (Genesis 6:2)

4:16 Cain 'went out from the presence of the Lord' because he had alienated himself - he was not 'of' the believers (1 John 2:19)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Many people tend to view the introduction of the promise to the serpent in Genesis 3:15 as a "band-aid" to fix up the mess man had gotten himself into.

But a little careful thinking will reveal that God had factored Sin into HIS grand plan, long before the first creative fiat was uttered in Genesis 1.

For a start, 7 days were employed to do what HE might easily have accomplished in just 1 day or even instantaneously. The seven days we know, speaks of the 7,000 year plan that HE has in mind with this creation.

Secondly, there is no "OOOPs" in heaven! It is not as if Jesus Christ was a "Mr Fix-it" created to undo Adam's faux pas. And neither was Jesus Christ "sitting on the sidelines" just in case He was needed. In other words, there was no 'Plan A' and 'Plan B'.

Jesus Christ was THE PLAN all along, but the Father is most definitely NOT the author of sin. The Serpent is the author of the first lie. Adam is the author of sin, even though Eve was the first to sin (?)... Or was she?

Adam was standing right there with her when she took of the fruit of the Tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil and ate of it.

It was he who had added to God's commandment of Genesis 2:17, "neither shall you touch it.... lest you die." But God had said, ..."thou shalt surely die!!"

So in this matter of transmitting the message to Eve of the commandment given in Genesis 2:17 [for she was created after this event], Adam had added an element not given by God, and he had diminished the certainty of the punishment.


So when Eve touched the fruit and no ill effects were observed, the conclusion reached by both Adam and Eve was that God must not really have meant what HE said. Faith would have decreed otherwise... but what they did was not of Faith.

Their "death" was also immediate. "Dying you shall die" can describe a "process" which ends in the grave, but when the Elohim came to converse with Adam in the cool of the evening, they had need to "call to Adam"... not that they had lost Adam... Adam had lost God! He (and Eve) were now "dead in trespasses and sins", separated from their God because of their Rebellion... (note:- A rebel always knows 'a better way!')

Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

3:18 Trace the idea of "thorns and thistles" throughout scripture. It was the thorns, the sins of the world, that lead Christ to His death
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to David

3:5 Knowing ‘good and evil’ is of itself little value. One has to be able to discern between good and evil as Jesus did – see Isa 7:15

4:2 Cain was a ‘tiller of the ground’ so he was doing what God has commanded (Gen 3:23) – but the fact that he was doing the work God gave Adam was no guarantee that he was faithful.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Gen 3:14  We note in this verse that not only was the serpent cursed, but also all cattle and every beast of the field. The serpent was cursed above the other cattle and beasts. That curse we are told, is that it would crawl upon its belly all the days of its life. When we go to John 8:43, we see another curse that the serpent received; "ye cannot hear my word" The serpent we are told has no hearing. What a wonderful blessing we have in that we can and have heard the spoken word. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Abel's offering of a lamb had been accepted, whilst Cain's offering of produce from the ground had not (Gen 4:4,5).

In Gen 4:7 Cain is told by the Lord that he had an opportunity to put this right.
That opportunity would come in the form of sacrificing a lamb. The sin which lay at the door (readily available) was a sin offering. The Hebrew word for sin,
chata'ah, implies this. Also, consider other scriptures that talk about sin but mean sin offering (Hos 4:8; 2Cor 5:21).
If Cain had humbled himself and sought a lamb from his brother Abel, he could have offered an acceptable sacrifice.

This, like the acceptable covering made by animal sacrifice of Gen 3:21, pointed forward to the perfect lamb, Jesus who would, by his sacrifice, take away the sin of the world.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
3:22 God rejected Adam's humanly devised covering, and provided them instead with "coats of skins". This required the slaying of animals. In this our Heavenly Father was teaching a lesson. Nakedness in Scripture symbolizes the state of sin (Rev 16:15). For sin to be covered and fellowship with God restored, a sacrifice provided by God was required. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

In her repetition of God's words, Eve shows that our tendency to place rules between ourselves and God has been there from the start.  Notice the difference in the highlighted parts of these verses:

ch.2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17  But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

ch.3:2  And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3  But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

Eve puts her own spin on God's words and even attributes that spin to God himself.  Here is the start of what later became the teaching of the Pharisees.  Paul refers back to this incident in Col. 2 (I quote several verses as the NIV is so helpful here)

20  Since you died with Christ to the basic principles of this world, why, as though you still belonged to it, do you submit to its rules:
21  "Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!"?
22  These are all destined to perish with use, because they are based on human commands and teachings.
23  Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.

What an exhortation to faith!


Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
3:15 - A serpent introduced the seed of sin while the woman's seed refers to Christ who crushes the head of sin (a permanent blow ) while sin would strike Christ's heel (a non permanent blow).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

3:16 The sorry state of the woman in childbirth presented here is contrasted wonderfully in Luke 1:28  when Mary is promised that she will be the mother of Messiah.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

4:1,2  That ‘she’ conceived starts the hope of the promised ‘seed of the woman’. Normally it is the man who is presented as having sons, even though the woman bears them. That Eve was looking for the promised seed is borne out by her comment ‘I have gotten a man from the Lord’


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

 

The serpent's lie, Ye shall not surely die (3:4), is perpetuated by the apostate church today.  The belief that man has an immortal soul, and that at death his soul floats off to heaven, maintains this deceit.  The term immortal soul is never seen in the Bible.  However, the Bible clearly states that man dies (Psa 49:10, 146:4).  All men (mortal souls) are sinners and suffer the result of sin, which is death (Eze 18:4; Rom 3:23).  The only way to overcome this fatal disease, which we have inherited from Adam, is through Jesus (1Cor 15:22). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael
HIDE
 
They hid. I have often thought that Adam and Eve were in such an enviable position to have direct access to God, to have him walking through the garden where they lived and to have open communication with him. But today I wondered how much I would really like it if God just came and wandered through my backyard or through my house any time he felt like it. He would see me at any time whether I was in the mood to walk with him or whether I was found in the midst of sin.
 
While I still envy the fellowship with God that Adam and Eve were able to share, there would certainly be plenty of times that I would want to hide just like them. We can all imagine how we would feel if God walked in at that vital moment to catch us in our worst position.
 
The reality is that God is here. While we cannot physically see or feel his presence, he is watching us all the time and he knows exactly what we are doing. It was not on his walk through the garden that God discovered they had sinned - he already knew. He knows us just as well too. Even though we cannot see him, we cannot hide from him.
 
With the help of God and the help of his son, Jesus, let us do all we can to be our best while he watches us our whole life through. Let us aim to stay pure and free from sin, so there will be fewer embarrassing moments that will make us want to hide from him.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Robert

3:10When Adam and Eve were afraid and hid they showed the behaviour of anyone who views God with terror. Jesus drew on this – Matt 25:24 – when he talks of the man who hid his talent in the ground. Are we terrified of God or full of awe?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

Gen 3:16  The second half of this verse is translated in an interesting way in the NET Bible:

"you will want to control your husband, but he will dominate you"

& well summarises the problems we wrestle with today. Neither position is correct, as shown by the apostle Paul's words in Eph 5:22-33. The word translated "control" here, or "desire"  8669  in other versions, occurs as "desire" in 2 other places in the OT. One is in Song 7:10 which has the usual sexual connotation, but the other is in Gen 4:7 where sin as a beast crouches at the door desiring to have Cain. The inference there is one of control & mastery.

 


Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Wendy

 

Jesus has always been central to the LORD's plan and purpose.  He was in the mind of the Father before the world began (John 17:24).  As the outcomes of the events in Eden were already known to the LORD, Jesus was neither an afterthought nor a back-up plan - He was the plan.

3:6 The impulses that triggered Eve's attraction to the forbidden fruit are common to all humankind and underscore the world of flesh (1John 2:16).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

3:18 Matt 13:22 explains that the ‘thorns’ are the cares of this life. Adam’s work could either turn him in upon himself, seeing gardening as simply a care. On the other hand he could see God working in his life for his salvation. Likewise our experiences can either drive us away from God or help us to see Him at work in our lives.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

3:18 Matt 13:22 explains that the ‘thorns’ are the cares of this life. Adam’s work could either turn him in upon himself, seeing gardening as simply a care. On the other hand he could see God working in his life for his salvation. Likewise our experiences can either drive us away from God or help us to see Him at work in our lives.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
3:19 - there is no mystery regarding death. Mankind was created from dust and upon death returns to dust in the grave. There are no thoughts when dead, it is like sleep Psa 146:4. The only escape from death is that some will be resurrected, judged and mercifully through grace allowed to reign on the earth when Christ returns Dan 12:2; Matt 25:31-34; Matt 5:5; Rev 5:10
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Charles

 

The relationship, based on faith and trust that man had with Yahweh was shattered.   Now Yahweh would be alien from man because he (man) broke that bond.  How could Yahweh be brought once more into a relationship with man?  Yahweh had already made a provision.  His only Son would become the mediator between Him and man (1Tim 2:5).  Jesus was the Lamb of God, the perfect sacrifice, which was foreshadowed by the sacrifice of Abel (Heb 12:24).  Jesus' shed blood would allow true believers to be in covenant relationship with Yahweh through Him.  But, this revealed process began right after the fall of Adam and Eve.  It did not, as some so-called Christians believe, begin at the birth of Jesus.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

3:1   Nakedness passes into Biblical use as an indicator of being astray from God. The word translated ‘subtil <06175>  is closely related to the word translated as ‘naked <06174> in Gen 2:5.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

Gen 3:17-19 First Principles>The Atonement
1. Death was the punishment for Adam's and Eve's transgression. Adam and Eve were the human race. The race sinned, so it was condemmed to death
Rom 5:12. We sinned in Adam because we belong to Adam's race. The human race was made sinful and men are sinners because
    1. We are descendants of Adam
    2. By actual transgression.
What is sin? It is disobedience to God
1John 3:4.
Because of sin, men die Rom 6:23 and this is the result of the fact that men ar descended from Adam. By the offence of one, judgement came upon all men Rom 5:18. All have sinned and come short of the Glory of God Rom 3:23.
2. The principles of the Atonement revealed in Eden - go to Gen 3:15
3. The Principles were brought out in the Law, for example by comparison between the Passover sacrifice and Jesus' sacrifice - go to Exo 12:3
4. Jesus' coming in relation to the Atonement - go to Gal 4:4
5. The atoning death of Jesus - go to John 1:29
6. How can we obtain atonement? - go to Rom 5:8-11
First Principles> For more First Principles topics, go to Acts 8:12.


Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger
Gen 3:15 - the promised deliverer would be the seed of a woman, not the seed of a man Isa 7:14;Gal 4:4.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

Gen 3:21;Rom 4:7-8;Isa 53:5;Rom 13:14;2Cor 5:1-4;Zech 3:3-4;Psa 85:2 - the concept of shed blood as a covering for sin. Putting on Christ for the forgiveness of sins and the hope of eternal life. 

Gen 3:22,24;Rev 2:7;Rev 22:1-2 - Here we have the tree of life (and water of life - echo of the word or baptism?), but a sacrifice would be required, and from a tree of death would come life Acts 5:30-31.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles
We have to worship on God's terms not our own - Gen 4:4-7;Hos 4:6;John 4:24;2Tim 2:15;2Tim 3:16-17;2Tim 4:3-4.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

3:6 The process that eve went through from seeing to taking is reflected in the behaviour of Achan – Josh 7:21 and David in 2Sam 11:2-4highlighting that Eve’s problem is common to all mankind.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Psalms 3, 4 and 5
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 3 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 4 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 5 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 3 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 4 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 5 online in the New International Version

 

David claims that God is 'the lifter up of mine head' in Ps. 3:3. This uses 2 hebrew words: ruwm (lifter up) and ro'sh (head). Head here is the normal word for head but is variously translated also as captain, chief, top, first, etc. This gives a greater meaning for us when David uses the same construction in Ps.27:5,6 and 110:5-7, where the context seems to be shifted by the rest of the verses round it to refer not to David's head itself, but to David's head - The Lord God. You may be interested to observe, since Eliphaz had already been mentioned, the he too uses these two hebrew words together - Job 22:12, here height=ro'sh and high=ruwm.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
4:3 - Here is the essence of salvation - God will give it to all who he has set apart and called to the gospel. We must rejoice that we are in that number. Psa. 135:4, 31:23, 50:5, 79:2, 6:8, 9; 17:6
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Psa 3 - The title of this Psalm tells us what historical event is remembered in the Psalm. So when David says :8 'salvation belongeth unto the Lord' we realise that he is saying this against the background of his fear of the counsel of Ahithophel and Absalom's following.

4:2 'Selah' means 'weight' in the sense of 'value' - it is used - Job 28:16 where it is translated 'valued'. We should read the word when readings the Psalms and understand that it is an instruction in the text to value the things we have just read.

Psa 5 - Some have problems with the way in which David desires judgement on the wicked - v10 - however this can be understood by realising that David was looking for God to fulfil His words on the wicked. Without an end to the wicked there will be no kingdom of God. So, in a sense, when we pray 'thy kingdom come, thy will be done' we are implicitly requesting the destruction of the wicked.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

Psalm 3 - THE PEACE OF GOD
David was fleeing from Absalom when he wrote this Psalm. His kingdom was being held in the balance. He had fled from Jerusalem, been kicked out of his home, pelted with stones and insults, had some of his best friends desert him and his own son was after his life. If there was ever anyone with worries and a reason to panic, it was David. But David had the LORD God of Israel on his side. He said, "But you are a shield around me, O LORD; you bestow glory on me and lift up my head." David totally trusted in his God. He knew that no-one could get to him unless God let them. He had perfect peace because God was with him. We can see how much peace he had and how effective it was in his life when we read, "I lie down and sleep; I wake again because the LORD sustains me. I will not fear tens of thousands drawn up against me on every side."
When we have troubles can we lie down and sleep like David did? Trust God and let his peace fill your life.

Psalm 4 - THE LIGHT OF GOD'S FACE
Do you get depressed or angry when you look at the world around you, or even at the people in your church and see people dishonouring God, worshipping idols and turning away from the truth? One of our hymns always brings tears to my eyes when I read,
"How many have their portion,
And calling high, forgot,
And seek for ease and glory
Where thou their Lord art not."

and,
"How long O heavenly bridegroom
Wilt thou thy household leave,
And yet how few are grieving,
Few thy return believe.
Immersed in sloth and folly
Thy people, Lord, we see,
And few of us stand ready
With joy to welcome thee"

It is a sad thought that so many people reject God.
But there is joy for those of us who are devoted to God. The Psalmist's prayer is that the light of God's face would shine upon us. What an awesome thought! Surrounded by the glory of God! He also says that God fills his heart with great joy and peace. So when life's burdens get on top of you, pray for God to shine the light of his love upon you and be filled with the joy and peace that comes from the mercy and love of God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert

3:6 The boast that the Psalmist will not be afraid of 10,000 picks up the promise to the faithful in Israel (Leviticus 26:8)

4:2 In saying that wicked men have turned his glory into shame the Psalmist is demonstrating that his enemies have been slandering him. This is the common way that enemies speak of those they hate when they have no real evidence of wrong doing.

5:9 'their throat … their tongue' is quoted (Romans 3:13) as part of an argument to show that all men are sinners. The way it is used in the Psalm shows that it is not a passive sinfulness. Rather men show that they are sinners by the way that they behave.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Psalms 3-5 - A collection of Psalms revealing King David's inner thoughts as he lay down his head to sleep each night, knowing that his son Absalom and his familiar friend, Ahithophel were in open rebellion against the throne. What could he do? Nothing, but close his eyes, and allow the Father to work it all out in HIS own time.

4:2 & 5:6 speak of "leasing" - This is a Saxon word, from 'falsehood', from 'to lie'. Cardmarden adopted this word in his translation, Rouen, in 1566. It is in none of the Bibles previously to that time, nor in any after, and appears to have been borrowed by King James's translators from the above. [So says Adam Clarke].

Psalm 4:4 "Stand in awe, and sin not..." Psa 4:4 - The LXX says "Be ye angry, and sin not..." as quoted by Paul in Eph 4:26. The Vulgate, Syriac, Ethiopic, and Arabic, give the same reading; and thus the original might be paraphrased: "If you be angry, or if you think you have cause to be angry; do not let your disaffection carry you to acts of rebellion against both God and your king. Consider the subject deeply before you attempt to act. Do nothing rashly; do not justify one evil act by another: sleep on the business; converse with your heart upon your bed; consult your pillow. And be still - lit. "and be dumb." Selah. Mark this!
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

In Psalm 3 and 4 David is obviously in great distress. Many times he repeats the words "save me" or "hear my cry!" How interesting, then, that in 3:5 David says "I lay down and slept". How could someone sleep whilst in a state of such trouble and anxiety? Again, in 4:4 he is quiet on his bed, and 4:8 he says "I will both lie down in peace, and sleep"!

Jesus did the same thing when he was in the boat on Galilee. He was in the same trouble as the desciples, being in the same boat, yet whilst they were anxious, he was calmly asleep. He rebuked them for their anxiety and called it "unbelief".

So also with David. In his anxiety he called to God. He meditated upon his knowledge of God, and realised that having asked his Father for help, he ought to believe in that help, because God had always helped him in times past. When he wrote the words of these Psalms, he was probably still experiencing his problems, yet he had conquered his anxiety through faith. Therefore in 3:6 he says "I will not be afraid", and in 4:5 "put your trust in the LORD". Having realised these things, he could confidently say "I will both lie down in peace, and sleep; For you alone, O LORD, make me dwell in safety".


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Rob

3:6 As this Psalm speaks of the Absalom uprising – see first comment – and David’s flight from Absalom is a pattern of Jesus arrest we can conclude that Jesus would take comfort from David’s assertion ‘I will not be afraid of ten thousands’ when the ‘band’ came to arrest him in the garden of Gethsemane.

4:5 Sacrifices of righteousness are not animals. It is the sacrifice of a man who wishes to give himself to God. Such a man is at peace with himself (Psa 4:8) He benefits from at peace with God because he wishes to serve Him

5:5 That the ‘foolish shall not stand’ is like the ‘ungodly’ who will not stand (Psa 1:5) so the ungodly and fools are equated with each other – maybe this should cause us to take care as to who we call a fool.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Psa 3  In these Psalms we see the power of prayer. David is in a great deal of danger, fleeing for his life. The LORD is his strength and comfort. Not only does he pray for God to be a shield or protector, he reconizes that it was God who delivered him from those who troubled him, and thanks God. "for thou LORD, only makest me dwell in safety" 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
Psa 5 - IN THE ARMS OF GOD
 
"But let those who take refuge in you be glad; let them ever sing for joy.  Spread your protection over them, that those who love your name may rejoice in you." (Psa 5:11)
 
Jesus said that to inherit the kingdom of God we need to be like little children. (Matt 18:3)  There are a lot of lessons we can learn from children and one of them is the lesson of refuge.  It is interesting to watch a small child as they encounter something they consider a possible threat.  They have no thought of fighting it off themselves, instead their instant reaction is to run back to Mum or Dad as fast as they can, to the safety of their parents' arms.  Once they have found the safety they sought, they can look the trouble in the eye from the security of the strength of their parents, and laugh at what once caused them fear.
 
All too often we miss the lesson our children teach us.  Instead of running to God at the slightest hint of trouble, crying out to him in prayer and looking to his advice, we try to fight our battles by ourselves.  But in the arms of God, our refuge and our protection, we too can laugh at fear.  Our trouble will turn into joy as God's salvation works in our lives.  Safe in the arms of God we will be able to ever sing for joy and rejoice in the LORD our God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Robert

v.3 - prayer in the morning - and at other specific times of day - is an emphasis of the Psalms:

5:3, 22:2, 55:17, 69:16, 88:13, 119:147, 130:6  See also Isa 26:9, Mark 1:35


Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

David knew what it was to be afraid. But God had "enlarged him" (Ps4:1). That's a Hebrew word meaning just as the AV says, to make bigger, to enlarge.  God had helped him in the time of his distress,
and had enabled him to survive.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

5:4 - wickedness cannot dwell with God. Only Christ and righteous angels etc. would ever be allowed in heaven. This is why we pray, "Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven" Matt 6:10. And this is why we have a mediator in Christ to bridge the gap of our sin to God's holiness 1Tim 2:5


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

3:5        David had fled from Jerusalem, when Absalom attempted to take the throne, as a man who had been sick – Psa 41:3– and arriving in Mahanaim2Sam 17:27 – he was provided with ‘beds … ‘ and so could rest. As he rested he thought through the implications of what God had said to him and took courage

4:4     ‘Stand in awe and sin not’ – quoted in Eph 4:26– teaches us that an awareness of the majesty of God should help us to resist temptation – knowing that our sins damage our relationship with our Father.

 

5:3      In saying that God will hear his prayer in the morning we see that David directed his day each and every day starting with prayer to his God.

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

 

As the Psalms were recited to music, we should look for the musical instruction which accompanies them. The heading of Psalm 4 instructs the musical director to use Neginoth, which are stringed instruments.  Psalm 5 the instruction is to use Nehiloth , flutes.  Sometimes the word Selah is seen (e.g. 4:2,4).  This is a musical pause, perhaps for reflection, and to allow for a change of accompaniment.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael
Psa 4 The Neginoth (introduction) (5058 NEGIYNAH) appears to be a stringed instrument, that was used when a poem was set to music. It is translated "songs to the stringed insruments"Isa 38:20 and "stringed instruments" Hab 3:19
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

3:8When David fled from Absalom he feared for his life, not knowing what was going to happen to him - 2Sam 15:26- but he did recognise that God was in control as this verse in the Psalm demonstrates.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

4:4 The NIV renders the first clause more clearly than the KJV when it says: In your anger do not sin.  Anger, itself, is not a sin as some suppose.  It is simply a display of extreme displeasure with something.  This can be an acceptable reaction if measured, as Jesus showed in the temple (Matt 21:12,13).  However, if anger is not carefully considered, it can escalate into rage.  Rage is unfocussed and uncontrollable, and always causes damage.  In this state, sin is bound to occur.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

3:6   David’s comment here is a reflection upon the words of his men – 2Sam 18:3 – where they, using the figure 10,000, value David as greater than that many men.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

3:2      The uprising of Absalom in the record in Scripture follows hard on from the matter of David and Bathsheba. The two events have striking similarities. It is as if the record of Scripture is concerned that we see the uprising of Absalom as directly connected with David committing adultery with Bathsheba. So the ‘many’ who  say if David ‘there is no help of God’ presents the attitude of many in Israel who still have not forgiven David for that matter even though at least 15 years have passed since David took Bathsheba. How often do we hold grudges against our brethren and sisters for years?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

4:8 So having spoken about the ‘wicked’ in this Psalm David voices his confidence in his God, being willing even to sleep whilst his enemies are around knowing that God will take care of him.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Matthew  3 and 4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Matthew 3 online in the King James Version Listen to Matthew 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to Matthew 3 online in the New International Version Listen to Matthew 4 online in the New International Version

 

Ch. 3 v. 7-10 shows us that John has a great understanding. He understood (which the disciples didn't) that even though he was a Jew, the word was now to spread to the gentiles. He recognised that it is the fruit that a person (tree) brings forth that makes the man, nothing else. It is the fruit that the man brings forth that makes him worthy of being kept alive - in this case eternally. This point is made and picked up to good use by others: Jesus (Matt.12:33), Paul (Gal.5:22, Phil.1:11), James (James3:8) Jesus (Rev.22:2). It is all (Jews and Gentiles) who bring forth "fruits meet for repentance" that will be worthy of eternal life.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
3:7 The Pharisees and Sadducees show - from this early time - that they were not for listening to messages from God. They were far more interested in preserving their own status - as they saw it. Their visit to John was to asses what sort of threat he posed, if any, rather than to learnt.

4:1 Jesus being 'led by the spirit' is echoed in Romans 8:14 and Galatians 5:18. Thus we see that rather than being taken into the wilderness by the holy spirit or some other spirit Matthew is here telling us how Jesus overcame the temptations in the wilderness. It was the spirit of the word of God - it's teaching - which sustained him. This is the pattern for ourselves.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

FACING TEMPTATION

There is only one standard we can use when it comes to making decisions about the directions our life will take and the principles we are going to live by. That standard is the Bible. Contained in the Bible are numerous instructions of how we should live a Godly life and plenty of examples to show us how it should be done. I have no doubt that as Jesus was tempted in the wilderness he called on both of these from his knowledge of God's word. This meant that when he was tempted, both in the wilderness and throughout the rest of his ministry, he could dismiss the temptation immediately because he knew the way God wanted him to go.

So there are two lessons to be learnt here. The first is that we must become totally familiar with the Bible so that God's word becomes more than a book to read, but part of us, in our permanent memory and ready for instant recall. The second is to recognise temptations for what they are and to rebuke them with God's word and then to turn from them and to follow through with our spoken resolve.

May God be with you as you struggle against sin.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
3:1 John's ministry was conducted in the wilderness. However this was no hindrance to his work. When Paul was preaching in Ephesus he found men who knew of John's teaching Acts 19:3

4:11 The ministering angels echoes Psalm 104:4 - see how this is expounded in Hebrews 1:6-7.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Mat 3:12 - "Whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor" - The picture is of a farmer at his threshing-floor, an area of hard-beaten earth on which the sheaves are spread out and the grain trodden out by the animals and
the winnowing sled.

His fan, that is his 'winnowing-shovel or fork', is in his hand, and with it he throws up the mingled wheat and chaff against the wind in order to separate the grain.

"Throughly cleanse" is an obsolete form of 'thoroughly'. The use of that word conveys the picture of the farmer beginning at one side of the floor, and working 'through' to the other, cleansing as he goes.

The whole metaphor represents the Messiah separating the evil from the good, by means of His teaching. Finally the worthy are received into his kingdom and the unworthy are consigned to destruction, in much the same way as the chaff and refuse were swept into a specially prepared fire so as to not recontaminate the cleaned grain.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

3:15 - 'for thus it becometh us to fulfil <4137> all righteousness <1343>.' The word used for fulfil is pleroo (4137) and the word for righteousness dikaiosune (1343).  There are two other places in scripture which use these two greek words together.  They are quite instructive:

Phil 1:11 Being filled <4137> with the fruits of righteousness <1343>, which are by Jesus Christ, unto the glory and praise of God.

James 2:23  And the scripture was fulfilled <4137> which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him  for righteousness <1343>: and he was called the Friend of God.

So it seems that there is an involvement available for the faithful in that which seems initially in Matthew 3 to be relevant only to Jesus.  Food for thought I feel.


Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

3:7 Vipers  Gen 3:1
      Fruits Gen 3:2

In the presence of the ‘seed of the woman’ John correctly identifies the seed of the serpent. This is the battle ground. It is set before Jesus began his ministry.

4:2 forty  Deut 8:2
      hungered Deut 8:3
The two quotations from Deuteronomy highlight that Jesus’ period in the wilderness, like Israel’s, was to ‘prove’ him – See Deut 8:2. Jesus learnt about himself from this experience. We, likewise, should learn from our trial. They are for our, not God’s, benefit.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Matt 3:3  John came in the spirit of Elijah, but did not perform the work that Elijah must accomplish. Elijah is to be sent forth to the Israelites scattered abroad after the return of Christ. He will prepare their hearts and minds to receive Christ.   
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

In Matt 3:7 John exclaims that the Pharisees and Sadducees were a generation of vipers.
This is one of the two classes of people that have populated (and continue to populate) the earth since the beginning:

The seed of the woman - those who have chosen to follow God on His terms.

The seed of the serpent - those who have chosen to follow their own fleshly desires.

The Pharisees and Sadducees were supposed to be the knowledgeable religious leaders of the Jews. And yet they were in error from both the true understanding of God's plan and correct conduct.

The lesson for us is that if we desire to serve God, then we must make sure of what He wants. This can only be obtained by reading His Word, the Bible.

We must not give credence to those who claim to be religious authorities until we have checked them out against the Bible (See Acts 17:10-11).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
3:2 - Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.  May this indeed be our message to our neighbours this year.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
3:4 John's food was as simple as his clothing. He subsisted on locusts and wild honey, such things would have been found in the wilderness. Honey, the kind that is found in the wild, was not just a sweetener, but an article of food. In the wilderness it could be found under rocks or in crevices under the rocks (Deut 32:13). We also read of wild honey being a source of food for both Samson (Judg 14:8;9;18) and of Jonathan (1Sam 14:25;26;29)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
4:1-11 - One could reasonably question what state of mind Jesus might have been in while fasting in the wilderness for 40 days. There is no mountain where one can see all the kingdoms of the world. Jerusalem is not in a wilderness Mark 1:13. Jesus was tempted in all points as we are Heb 4:15. The process of temptation is described in James 1:13-15
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

2:6     Whilst here we read 'Bethlehem in the land of Judah' Mic 4:2 has 'Bethlehem Ephratah'. There is no contradiction. Both are describing the same place in different ways. Thus we see that a quotation from the Old Testament need not have exactly the same words but the meaning of the original passage is preserved.

 

3:1     John's message 'repent ye ...' is the message of the gospel. No matter how we might wish to present the message this is the fundamental aspect that must be understood before commitment to baptism can be appreciated.

 

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

4:1 Israel were 'led' Deut 8:2 in the wilderness like Jesus was 'led’ into the wilderness.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

The first connection with Heaven that people saw with this 30yr Man was when God publically proclaimed Him as his Son (Matt 3:16,17). I presume the message to the shepherds in Bethlehem, and the star which God sent above the house where the family were, had been forgotten. If they had been remembered, perhaps the whole ministry of Jesus could have been linked in, and more made of His message. But that was not to be. Then Jesus was tempted like us, but never gave in to the temptations. Here are two good lessons with which we can start the year.


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

3:2 John’s message was clear and simple. It was not beyond anyone’s intellect to understand. It was also the message of Jesus – Matt 4:17. we might rightly develop a comprehensive description of ‘the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ’ however Jesus, like John, presents a simple message – we are all going to die. Repentance is the only escape.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

Jesus fasted forty days and nights before He was tempted (4:2).  Thus, He was in a severely weakened state.  Although He had the power to command anything He wanted, he resisted temptation (Matt 26:53).  He blocked any enticement with the use of scripture.  Jesus' battle was an internal dialog.  He was challenged by the desires of the flesh, which He knew could be satisfied by the power at His disposal.  But, He overcame and won the battle, leaving us a great example to follow (Heb 4:15; James 4:7).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

 

4:8     Jesus calls upon his disciples – Matt 16:26  – to resist the sae temptation as he experiences here.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

Some people believe that Jesus faced an external tempter.  They believe that this was Satan, a supernatural being (fallen angel), the universal agitator of evil.  

If Satan exists, he (?) would have been created by Yahweh.  Divine angels, by nature, are immortal.  Thus, Satan, a supposed fallen divine angel, would be immortal.  That would mean that evil would exist forever.  But, that is not in Yahweh's plan. 

The faithful followers of Jesus will live forever in peace (Rev 21:4).  But all evil, including death itself will be abolished (Rev 20:10,14). 

The word Satan, which Bible translators chose to capitalize and personify, is nothing more than the innate human tendency to be oppositional to God's laws - the flesh opposing the Spirit.

And so, each person is tempted internally by their own desires and not by an external agent.  Jesus, being a man and having a human nature, weakened by forty days of fasting, was tempted internally. He overcame each temptation by refuting it with the power of the scripture.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

 

3:13-17 Jesus was baptized. Some people say that baptism is not necessary, only belief.  It seems a strange assertion to say that baptism is not necessary when the Master Himself consented to do it.  It is also important to understand the reason.  But, some might object that Jesus was a sinless man, so why did He need to be baptized?  What righteousness was he fulfilling?  Yes, Jesus was a man - flesh and blood like you and me (Rom 1:3).  Flesh is corruptible and subject to death (Rom 5:12).  And yet, Jesus did not sin.  But still, He was a man who possessed sinful, corruptible flesh.  As such, he could not enter any spiritual perfect realm and truly dwell with Yahweh (1Cor 15:50).  And so, He, the sinless man, had to destroy that flesh by becoming a sacrifice for sin (2Cor 5:21; Heb 2:14).  He was successful and has now, by Yahweh's grace, transcended death.  In doing so, He has opened the door for others to follow.  He fulfilled all righteousness, through His baptism, by giving recognition that He, like all humans, bore sinful flesh.  He was showing that flesh needed be cleansed before a person could be put right with Yahweh.  For true followers of Jesus, that cleansing occurs with baptism into the death and resurrection of Jesus, after a sound confession of faith.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

3:2 At this time there were those looking for the kingdom of God – Luke 23:51 – so John’s appearance would have been a cause of great joy – but not for everyone. For the religious leaders are already opposed to his preaching – Matt 3:7 – so we see that they were opposed to the message long before Jesus came on the scene. They saw the preaching of John as a threat to their position as they later did of Jesus.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

Jesus Christ is the promised son through whom salvation is possible (continued from part one, see January 1st)

6. Christ had a oneness or same goal/purpose as God but he did not claim to be God...Matt 3:16-17;1Cor 8:6;John 10:30-36;John 17:21-23;Mark 15:34 (if Christ was God why would he cry out to his God?); 1Tim 2:5;John 3:16.

7. Christ is the second Adam but unlike Adam, he didn't sin and attained a spiritual body as the first born of the new (eternal life) creation...Matt 21:42;1Cor 15:13-14,1Cor 15:20-28,1Cor 15:45-49;Heb 5:7-9;Heb 9:24-28;Matt 26:25-29;1Cor 11:23-26 (Christ was betrayed, how we are to remember Christ and his sacrificial death, Christ will return).

8. Though Jesus was born circa 4 BC, the plan of salvation through Jesus always existed...Isa 46:9-10;Acts 15:17-18;Matt 25:34;John 17:5 ("..I had 'with' you  before the world began..." - the word "with" is the Grk word "para" and can mean "with, in the sight of, from, by, of" - The Scriptures make it seem as if others almost pre-existed Eph 1:4, God was envisioning the future beauty of Christ much in the same manner as an architect envisions his future creation) ,24 (God loved Jeremiah before he was born Jer 1:5-7); Heb 4:1-5 (reference to a millenial 7th "day" of rest/peace); 2Sam 7:12-14 (a future son, i.e. Christ who will reign forever on the earthly throne of his father David).


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

Matt 4:23 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Gospel concerns God's Kingdom
The Gospel preached by Jesus and the Apostles concerns the Kingdom of God.
1. Examples of teaching concerning the Kingdom of God
Matt 4:23, Mark 1:14, Luke 8:1, Acts 8:12, Acts 19:8, Acts 20:25, Acts 28:31
2. Invitation for men to participate
Matt 25:34, Luke 12:32, 1Thess 2:12, James 2:5, 2Tim 4:1,8, 2Pet 1:10,11, Rev 2:26,27

First Principles>Kingdom of God
For more about the Kingdom of God, go to Gen 12:1


Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

HAPPY AND SATISFIED

 

"God wouldn't want me to be unhappy." I have heard people say this on a number of occasions, and in particular, it has most often been used when someone needs an excuse to justify their actions.

 

If anyone was going to be unhappy, it would have been Jesus after he had fasted for forty days and forty nights. He had the power of the Spirit and was tempted. "If you are the Son of God tell these stones to become bread." (Matt 4:3) He could have argued that God wouldn't want him to be unhappy or hungry. In saying this, it would have been right to use his power to turn stones into bread. But instead Jesus responded with,"Man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of God." (v.4) Jesus was determined to do God's will above his own whatever the cost to himself, or whether his actions made him happy or sad, comfortable or uncomfortable.

 

Jesus could have asked himself the same question as he hung on the cross. Did God want him unhappy? Of course not! But more important than being comfortable or happy is doing the will of God and making him happy.

 

We, like Jesus, must live on "every word that comes from the mouth of God" without compromise for our personal satisfaction, happiness or comfort.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

REPENT AND CONFESS

 

When the people heard that John the Baptist was baptizing people in the Jordan River, they all went out to him. "Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan river." (Matt 3:6) John the Baptist wanted to see a change of life in the people he baptized, that is why he said to the Pharisees and Saducees who came to him, "Produce fruit in keeping with repentance." (v.8) And later, speaking of the meaning of baptism, John said, "I baptize you with water for repentance." (v.11)

 

Repentance was the key to John's baptism. To repent means to completely change direction. So when we read that they confessed their sins as they were baptized, it was not that they told their innermost secrets of who they were and allowed people to watch them and accuse them of more of the same. It was more a statement of "This is what I have been like up until this point in time. Now I am changing for good. Watch and you will see my new life."

 

It was the change of life that was needed that prompted John to say, "Produce fruit in keeping with repentance." If we have repented we will not be ashamed to speak about the person we used to be, because we are no longer the same person. Our way of life will show us to be far different and the change will be obvious to everyone, bringing glory to God.

 

May the repentance we make be a true repentance leading to a new life in Christ.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS

 

When Jesus went to Capernaum for a short time, he fulfilled a prophecy made many years before by Isaiah. "Land of Zebulun and land of Naphtali, the way to the sea, along the Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles - the people living in darkness have seen a great light; on those living in the land of the shaddow of death a light has dawned." (Matt 4:15-16, Isa 9:1-2)

 

This prophecy was fulfilled in Jesus because everyone could see that he was the Son of God by the miracles he did, by his way of life and by listening to his teaching. He gave hope to people who had no hope. He gave life to those who had given up. He showed the way from the darkness of sin and death to the light and life of God. It was as if Jesus opened the doors and windows to breathe in a breath of fresh air and lighten up the darkness.

 

Jesus did it in Capernaium, Paul did it in Philippi, Philip did it in Samaria. It is my job to do it in Auckland and your job to do it in the place where you live and work. Let us, like Jesus, be people whose light shines to draw others toward God. Let's be people who spread hope, joy, life and light to those about us who are living in darkness.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

t 3:7-8 Here are a couple of allusions to the garden of Eden. The ‘vipers’ answer to the ‘serpent – Genesis 3:1 and the ‘fruits’ to the ‘fruit’ of the tree – Gen 2:2 It is all a matter of who we listen to. That was the challenge for Eva and Adam and those that came to listen to John. It is also the challenge that we have to deal with all the time. To whom do we listen? It is as simple as that.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
4:11  Right at the start of his ministry, God sent an angel to minister to Jesus.  This is undoubtedly an indication of what the temptation had taken out of him.  A similar event occurred right at the end of his ministry Luke 22:43 when, again, much effort had been expended.
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Ken