January 20

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Genesis  34 and 35
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Genesis 34 online in the King James Version Listen to Genesis 35 online in the King James Version
Listen to Genesis 34 online in the New International Version Listen to Genesis 35 online in the New International Version

 

35v.4 - the 'oak' tree here is the hebrew 'elah, which is a terebinth tree. No less than 4 different hebrew words are translated 'oak', but the other occasion that an oak is mentioned at Shechem (Jos.24:26), it is a direct derivative of the same word as is used here. The context in Joshua is just the same too (24:22-27). [Notice also it is the passage we referred to a day or two ago about the stones being a witness too]. The oak under which Deborah was buried in v. 8 of Gen 35 is different. This word just means 'a big tree'.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
34 v.15 - This was deception, and yet it followed a principle of truth. It was necessary for the person Dinah married to be circumcised, as that was a requirement of being part of the family of Israel. And yet, this truth was used in deceiving them. The same thing seems to happen in the speeches of Job's three friends - the things they say are in correct, as far as they go. I think there must be a lesson here for us. We have a tendency, being human, to get the emphasis wrong. Let us pray today that we might truly discern those things which God would have us do with His word in our lives.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
ch 34 - The whole incident of Dinah and Shechem is most unpleasant. It highlights the dangers of investigating what the world has to offer. The behaviour of Simeon and Levi is appalling also.. It seems that Shechem had, by the world's standards, high principles. Of course this would not justify Dinah marrying him. From the way that the men of the land speak it is clear to see how the 'world' thinks - it is self seeking.

ch 35 - Jacob owned a parcel of ground at Shechem - Abraham had bought it. So the gold was buried on his own land.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

ch 34 - The behaviour of Simeon and Levi is as deceitful as their father had been often in his life - so the way that we behave is learnt by our children.

35:21 The 'tower of Edar' at Bethlehem is the 'tower of the flock' of Micah 4:8


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Genesis 34, Genesis 35 - These two chapters contain, among many other things, an insight into the dynamics of Jacob's family. Dinah, Jacob's only [recorded] daughter, whose name means "Justice or Right" appears to have sought the company of friends in the world to [perhaps] alleviate the loneliness she felt within the compound, where there was most likely a dearth of girls around her age. Her adventures led her to Shechem, a [honourable?] young man of the world it seems [in his willingness to redress his wrongdoing with Dinah, by submitting to circumcision] and for Shechem it seems as though he has found his "Miss Right." Simeon and Levi are revealed as scheming and as treacherous as any "Syrian," and their readiness to "cheat" to gain their revenge becomes a reflection on Jacob ["The Cheat"] himself. Jacob is revealed as being ready to wait on God in the matter of Dinah v5, whereas earlier in life his reactions would have been redress the situation in his own strength, just as Simeon and Levi now do. Rachel dies tragically in childbirth, bringing forth young Benjamin into the world. Rueben, Jacob's firstborn son, who should have been the "priest in waiting" for the family, reveals his passion for the "here and now," by sleeping immorally with Bilhah, his mothers handmaiden. What great comfort we derive once again from the fact that though this patriarchal family is so dysfunctional, God continues to work with it to forward His purpose and fulfil His plans.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

34:19 Notice that God’s assessment of Hamor is that he was ‘more honourable’ than the rest of the men of Shechem. Thus we learn that one who does not share an understanding of God’s promises can still have a degree of ‘honour’.

35:11 In describing Himself as ‘God Almighty’ Jacob is being reminded of the promises (Gen 17:1, 28:3)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

v 1.Dinah went window shopping. She went to see what the local girls were doing. But it was probably her naivity which led to her being raped by the prince. What a lesson for us parents, and Sunday School teachers. We must always prepare our youngsters for facing the world. Perhaps her parents had been too involved with the boys’ upbringing, and had not forewarned Dinah.  The dreadful consequences of this unhappy event led to many lives being lost, and to the harsh sentence of Jacob inGen 49:5-7.


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
Simeon and Levi administered retribution to Hamor and his clan over Shechem's rape of Dinah.  This action unnerved Jacob as he considered his position vis-à-vis his neighbors (34:30).  His faith needed bolstering and so Yahweh brought him back to Bethel (35:1).  There Yahweh re-confirmed his role and destiny in His plan (35:9-13), and Jacob praised and recognized the Lord's blessing (35:14,15).  Similarly, do we not come each week to the altar of Yahweh to have our faith renewed?
Note that before going to the altar of Yahweh at Bethel, Jacob insisted that his household relinquish their idols (35:2,3).  Likewise, before we come to the altar of the Lord, we should be sure to divest ourselves of any worldly influences.

Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
34:23 - Once again we see that the main attraction was money and wealth.  We are all so taken in by the possession of money, and will do almost anything to attain it.  Scripture contains many lessons about money and about our desires.  Not all possession of money is bad - many of the good men of old were also very rich, but the attitude towards it is very important.  Let us give God the glory in all that we do and all that we possess.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
35:29 Feeble and blind, Isaac lived to an advanced age. It would have been a pleasing thing for him if he was aware of the reconciliation between Esau and Jacob as they met at Mamre to bury their father. The reconciliation was a temporary thing, as we still witness today.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

35:1-7 - "Bethel" means "house of God". In v.2 we have them getting rid of their idols and in v.4 burying their "sin" under a tree somewhat akin to Christ's sacrifice on the cross burying our sins. V.6 - "Luz" probably means "almond tree" which was the first tree to blossom in the Spring and thus combined with the altar where God appeared perhaps a symbol of sacrifice and resurrection.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

34:9 Continuing on the last comment on this verse even though Shechem was ‘more honourable’ he was in darkness and as such was an unsuitable husband for Dinah. We need to understand that good standing or ‘honour’ in a man or woman of the world is not sufficient reason to compromise the principles of the truth.

35:4 One wonders what Jacob thought when Rachel gave him the god she has stolen from her father’s house – Gen 31:19


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

Gen 35:21 Jacob is not called Israel until this point.  Now that the last vestige of Syria is dead and buried, with Rebekah's nurse, and now Rachel behind him, he can now go forward fully dependent on God.


Graeme Rudland [Crewe (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Graeme

 

Jacob and his family had long since left Padanaram.  It appears, however, that Rachel had kept possession of the teraphim she stole from her father (35:2).  But now the time was right for Jacob to make a complete commitment to Yahweh.  And so, he swept house.  His vow to worship only Yahweh would later be a command via the mouth of Moses (Exo 20:3,4).  Jacob's directive to clean and change garments (Gen 35:2) was a pledge to be pure in front of Yahweh.  This too would be reflected in the Law of Moses (see Lev.15).    


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

34:13 Jacob was a ‘deceiver’ – using guile at times in his life. His sons learnt this skill from him. When they spoke to Shechem and his father they spoke ‘with guile’ – RV. We do well to remember that our children learn by watching us.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

v8  It is strange that we have Rebekah's nurse mentioned here, within the context of Jacob's household's travels. The only other time we read of her (if it is the same nurse), is in Gen 24:59  when she travels with Rebekah from her childhhod home to join her new husband. So we would presume that she continued to live in Isaac's household, not Jacob's. Perhaps she had previously died & been buried in that spot, & that it was a site that Jacob would have stopped at on his way, perhaps having fond memories of Deborah, & not having seen her since he had left to live with Laban. Jacob, after entering the land, stops at Shechem, & then travels south to Bethel, through the Bethlehem area, & ends up at his father Isaac's Camp at Hebron.

 


Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Wendy

35:10  This is the second time that Jacob’s name was changed to Israel. See Gen 32:28 So the name conferred by the angel after the struggle is confirmed by God Himself.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

Dinah has the same root as Dan.  Dan means judge and Dinah means justice.  Dinah would have been 14 or 15 years old at this time.  Curiosity of life overcame her and she had to see what was out there.  We know what happened, of course, but it would be interesting to wonder what went wrong.  Was it a case of immaturity, naïveté, lack of values or guidance, or a combination?  We don't know, but the incident should prompt us to street proof our youngsters against the present evil world.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

34:1 Doubtless Dinah’s motives were ‘pure’. After all she had a lot of brothers and little female company. However the ‘daughters of the land’ had their own interests – the boys of the land. Dinah was drawn into their interests with catastrophic consequences, even though Shechem was ‘honourable – Gen 34:18-19


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

35:2-4 The foreign servants of Jacob had been allowed to retain their idols. But now, Jacob insisted that all members of his household be pure in the sight of Yahweh. And so, he told his servants to accompany him with their gods for the purpose of burying them. He also told them to change their clothes. This was a common practice in the Ancient Near East when engaged in worship. It was understood as an outward sign of inner purity. Jacob's servants had been handling idolatrous gods; therefore, their clothes had become defiled. Later, the Moses would incorporate the idea of clean clothes with sanctification (e.g. Exo 19:14; Lev 11:25;14:8). The idea of clean clothes for worship also entered the modern western world, where one would wear their Sunday best to attend church. Some folks would call them their Sunday-go-to-meeting clothes. There also arose such sayings as: Cleanliness is next to godliness.

Jacob buried the foreign gods and accoutrements under an oak (Heb. elah). Actually, this was a terebinth tree (pistacia terebinthus). The terebinth grows throughout this region. In less fertile places, the tree is small and scrubby. But, in fertile place, the terebinth can grow to a height of 40 feet and sport lush, dark green leaves along broad branches. It also has red berries. This tree is related to one that produces pistachio nuts.

35:8 Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse was buried under an oak (Heb. allon). However, this tree was a true oak.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
4. Israel has 12 sons Gen 35:21-26
Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past

Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

35:19 We noticed in 30:24 how Rachel, as soon as Joseph was born, wanted another son – the name she gave Joseph highlighted this desire. However she never enjoyed this second son. Her desires of chapter 30 were of no avail. How often do we have desires which highlight dissatisfaction with what we have?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Psalm 37
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 37 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 37 online in the New International Version

 

v.7 - 'rest' - heb damam - has the overtone of the power of God to overrule man's thinking and desires. Look at these other occurrences of damam - Ex.15:16(still), Jos.10:12,13(still), 1Sam 2:9(silent), Ps.31:17(silent) This 'rest' is one imposed by God, but we submit to it willingly, with reverent awe. Ps.4:4(still).
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.6 is a picture of the part of the saints in the kingdom - Matt:13:43
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Jesus' teaching in the Sermon on the Mount - Matthew 5:5 'blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth' has Old Testament support :11, 22 34
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Psalm 37 -  Just as we are about to launch into the record of Joseph in our first reading, we find here a Psalm, the sentiments of which, though not yet formally composed as we have it here, must have greatly strengthened that godly man whilst he was isolated in Egypt, which was then the richest dynasty in the world. 21 times this Psalm states the surety and the certainty of the destinies of two classes of people described at length in 40 short verses. For example, v2 "the workers of iniquity, shall soon be cut down," but v11 "the meek shall inherit the earth." The principles discussed and revealed in this Psalm, are as universal and as timeless as the Father Himself. The struggles of mind revealed by the Psalmist surrounding the apparent contradiction between wrong doing and present wealth and ease, are also universal and timeless. The true Sons of God will find themselves struggling, especially in this materialistic day and age, with all the issues contained within this Psalm. Don't just read Psalm 37 today - bookmark it, and read it often - for its counsels are timeless and ever needful.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
Right through the Psalm David speaks of ‘The wicked’ mark each occurrence in your Bible – and then reflect on what the ‘wicked’ do – how often we tend to the way of the wicked – but ‘the wicked shall perish’ (Psa 37:20)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Psalm 37  This Psalm describes the character and reward of God's righteous servents. The reward of inheriting the earth is mentioned five times. V.9, 11, 22, 29, 34.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

This psalm calls for patience - the fourth component of the fruit of the spirit (Gal 5:22).  Let's not concern ourselves with the ungodly or their ways, even though they might prosper in this life (Psa 73:12).  We set our sights on the Kingdom whence is our prize (Matt 6:21, Phil 3:14).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
v.4 - Here we see that God will reward those that delight in him with everything they desire, but we need to recognise that the man who delights in God will have very different desires from the man who delights in riches. This principle applies throughout - an obvious example is Matt 6:33
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
When I was young the Christadelphian Isolation League gave our family a yearly calendar. One year the text said Psa 37:23. The verse has stayed with me. I pray it will help you, too.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

V.3 - Here we have the concept of faith and works required James 2:14 .

Psa 37:25 - David never saw the righteous foresaken or their children begging bread. I don't think this means the righteous will never starve but perhaps that it is a rare occurance as God is merciful and David had never seen it. Some perhaps feel it relates to spiritual food. The word used for "begging" [Heb. "baqash" (1245) has various meanings including "begging"]. When David and his men were hungry they ate the "shewbread" and the words used in 1Sam 21:3,6 were "give" and "gave" [both words are the Heb. "nathan" (5414) which has various meanings but not including "beg" or "begging" according to Strongs and Brown-Driver-Briggs].

Psa 37:37 - we can encourage each other by being good examples with a future reward being the peace of Jerusalem when Christ returns to rule.

Psa 37:40 - God wants us to turn to Him and trust Him for deliverance 1Cor 10:13 . A lady who had seen her share of difficulties once told me "we won't be tested beyond what we can bear but we might be tested beyond what we think we can bear."


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

37:8    Humanly speaking the strong inherit - or more correctly take by force - what they want. The ‘meek’ on the other hand leave things in God’s hands knowing that He is mightier than all the wicked put together!


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

Psa 37:11,22 These words form the basis of Jesus word sin Matt 5:5


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

v11  "the meek will inherit the land" is quoted by Jesus in Matt 5:5  but in this psalm we get further definitions of what it means to be "meek" & who the meek "who will inherit the land" are. v9 says that it is "those who hope in the LORD";  v22 says "those the LORD blesses";  v27  says it is those who "turn from evil & do good";   those who are "just" & "faithful" v 28 ;   v29 says they are "the righteous", & v31 says the righteous man has "the law of his God in his heart; his feet do not slip"; &  v34 says it is those who "wait for the LORD & keep his way". So this psalm expands on Jesus' words, & is an exhortation & an encouragement to those who are "meek".

 


Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Wendy

37:4 How does one ‘delight’ in the Lord? The answer. This delight is seen in the fact that one who does ‘delight’ in God loves to do His will.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

DO NOT FRET

 

If anyone had a lot on their mind, it would have been David. Attacked on two different occasions by a lion and a bear; facing Goliath with no armour, sword or bow; facing the wrath and jealousy of an angry king Saul; forced to flee into enemy territory in order to save his life; having all his possessions and wives stolen by an invading army; facing mutiny and stoning from those who were most loyal to him; having the responsibility of the kingship of all Israel; bearing up under the disquiet of rebellious children; running from his own son who was leading a coup against his father; and trying to keep a dividing nation together - if anyone had worries, it was David.

 

Yet three times throughout Psalm 37, David reminds us not to worry. In fact one of those occasions makes up the first few words of the psalm. "Do not fret because of evil men." (Psa 37:1) "Do not fret when men succeed in their ways, when they carry out their wicked schemes." (v.7) And, "Do not fret - it only leads to evil." (v.8)

 

If someone such as David refused to fret or worry about all the problems he had, then we should follow his example. The reason David didn't worry was because he put his trust in the LORD. Let us put our trust in the LORD and free our minds from worry, fretting and stress. "Do not fret - it only leads to evil."


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Robert

37:3-7‘Trust’ ‘delight’ ‘commit’ ‘rest’ marks a progression in the life of a man or woman of God who starts to place reliance upon God. The end point is one of total trust. That of placing all reliance ion God.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.11 The wicked seems to prosper in this life. They oppress the poor and become rich. The word meek (Heb. anavim) means those who are depressed, afflicted, or suffering (physically and/or in spirit). These are the very people who are exploited by the wicked (v.12). Instead of becoming angry and taking vengeance (v.8), the meek are directed to trust in Yahweh (v.7). Eventually, the wicked shall cease (v.10). But, those who trust in Yahweh, do His will, and wait patiently for Him, will eventually be liberated and inherit the land (vs.11,22,30).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
v7 At the beginning of this Psalm David talks three times of fretting because of the wicked, in this verse we are rather as David says to rest in the LORD. This word 'rest' lit means to be still/dumb founded and takes our minds to Jesus' disciples who were fretting because of the storm which was overwhelming the boat in which they were in with Jesus Mark 4:37-41.  Jesus' words to the stormy sea were 'be still', we are in the boat (ecclesia) also with our master, the sea (sea of nations/the world) can sometimes roar and we can feel alone and overwhelmed.  Like the discples we also have our Master in whom we can have rest. 
Pete Barrett [Milnsbridge UK]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Pete
37:1,7,8 'fret' means to become hot, jealous, angry (not fruits of the spirit Gal 5:22-23, Eph 5:9), fretting is also very de-energising.  The first occurence of the Hebrew charah here translated 'fret' is in Gen 4:5-6 translated 'wroth' twice and shows to where this can lead as it did with Cain Gen 4:8.
Pete Barrett [Milnsbridge UK]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Pete

37:10-11It is all too easy to think that the ‘wicked’ prosper. However once one thinks sensibly about that it becomes clear that they do not. Their prosperity perishes with their death. This contrasts with the reward of the righteous. Eternal inheritance on the earth.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

Those who trust God don't just swim through life never falling. But the promise is when they do they will not fall headlong because God is holding their hand (v24). It's a parent and child picture. And this is how Jesus led his life (Isa 42:6)


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob
Reading 3 - Matthew  22
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Matthew 22 online in the King James Version
Listen to Matthew 22 online in the New International Version

 

v.31,32. This is such a simple thing that Jesus chooses to use to prove the resurrection. Why should God continue to mention dead people in this way if there were no hope of resurrection. The actual event referred to here is the burning bush Mark 12:26,27 Exo.3:6,15,16. In that list of famous faithful, Hebrews 11 says .. v.16
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
22:16 In the gospels there are from time to time 'unholy' alliances. These are the occasions when we find a tie up between the Pharisees and Herodians. The Pharisees and Herodians had diametrically opposing views about the state. The Pharisees [from Hebrew Perez / divided] were separate from the state as they viewed it as corrupt. The Herodians, on the other hand, supported the current political situation with the Herod family as rulers. Matthew 22:16, Mark 3:6 8:15 12:13
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
22:12 The absence of the wedding garment quotes Zephaniah 1:8 where the prophet reproves those who are not prepared. We should be clothed with the garments of salvation (Isaiah 61:10) That is the wedding garment.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Matthew 22 - A record of Christ shutting the mouths of His opposition - see v12 "and he was speechless," v22 "they marvelled, and left Him and went their way" [by implication - He shut down their argument], v33 "they were astonished at His Doctrine" [by implication - they were "knocked flat" by His reasoning], v34 "He had put the Sadducees to silence," v46 "And no man was able to answer Him a word, neither did any man from that day forth ask Him any more questions." We have in this chapter an illustrious specimen of the wisdom of Jesus. He successfully met the snares of His mighty and crafty foes, and with infinite ease confounded them all - Scribes, Chief Priests, Sadducees, Herodians, Pharisees, and the multitude alike.  No art of man could confound Him. Never was teaching more clear, never was wisdom more triumphant. The lesson of this chapter? - Do not reject the "stone" of God's providing, the head or key stone of the building. For in rejecting what Jesus Christ stands for, is to invite Him to grind us to powder v44, like the chaff of the summer threshing floors Daniel 2:35, and to be removed forever, along with the entire system that makes up the present "Kingdom of Men."
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
:12 Jesus refers to very few people as 'Friend' but this man with no wedding garment gets this fairly intimate greeting. How should we be clothed? The clothing is clearly from God. 2Cor 5:1-11
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
22:12,15 Notice the interesting relationship. The man without the wedding garment was ‘speechless’ the leaders tried to entangle Jesus in his words.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Matt 22:19-22  What a wonderful lesson for all of us. The Greek word for image is EIKON 1504 "a likeness". There was stamped on the coin a likeness of Caesar, hence it was Ceasars. When we go back to the record of creation we remember what was said at the time that man was  created. Let us make man in our image, after our likeness Gen 1:26  We are made after the likeness of God, hence we are all a  resemblance of  God. We all belong to God. Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
This chapter concludes with an answer to the challenge which the elders had originally put to him in chapter ch. 21:23... by what authority are you doing these things? i.e. teaching in the temple. The ultimate answer was given as the implications of his final question, what think ye of Messiah, whose son is he... why does David in spirit call him 'my Lord'? came home to them. His authority to teach in God's house came from the fact that Messiah was not only son of David, but ALSO Son of GOD. No wonder they dare not ask him any more questions!
Peter Halpin [Lismore NSW Australia]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
v.5 - Here we see those who, having put their hand to the plough (and how else would they had obtained an invitation) have looked back.  Looking back is probably the hardest thing to resist.  Let us pray today that we might be kept from evil. Gen 19:26
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
WEDDING GARMENTS
 
Have you been invited to the wedding banquet?  The time will soon come when we will all sit down together in the kingdom of God and share in this wonderful banquet. But in the parable one man was thrown out. Why?
 
"But when the king came in to see the guests, he noticed a man there who was not wearing his wedding clothes. 'Friend,' he asked, 'how did you get in here without wedding clothes?' The man was speechless. Then the king told the attendants, 'Tie him hand and foot, and throw him outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.'" (Matt 22:11-13)
 
The man was thrown out because he was not wearing a wedding garment. In those days people at a wedding were given garments to wear and were expected to wear them. We, as followers of Christ, have also been given garments to wear, without which we will not be able to enter the kingdom of God.
 
Revelation tells us about the garments that we must wear. It reads, "For the wedding of the Lamb has come, and his bride has made herself ready. Fine linen, bright and clean, was given her to wear. (Fine linen stands for the righteous acts of the saints)." (Rev 19:7-8)
 
So let us ensure that we are properly dressed for the wedding banquet. Get dressed now with righteous acts, faith, (which is counted as righteousness) and in the grace of God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Robert

22:33 The astonishment of those who heard Jesus demonstrates that the leaders never explained Scripture in this careful way.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
V.36 The question asked by this expert in the law, was one that could be expected from him, and the men he represented. The Pharisees who were devoted to hair splitting legalism, carried on lengthy debates about the commandments, arguing whether any particular one was great or small, heavy or light. Christ leaves no doubt in his answer (V.37-40) as to what is the greatest commandment. 1John 4:18
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
I wonder if the Pharisees would make the connection between Christ quoting from Psa 110, and the Melchizedek verse in that Psalm, (Psa 110:1,4)?  The Lord directed them to v1 with His question about David calling Him “Lord”, but then comes the prophecy that Christ would not be a priest after Aaron’s line, but after Melchizedek. If they did make the connection, then perhaps that explains the people’s fear of Him in Matt 22:46.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

22:5 An invitation to the marriage of the King’s son is an important event. In ‘making light of it’ the Jewish leaders were showing their disdain for things which challenged their perception of how they should worship God.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
14 The gospel message goes out far and wide, to all four corners of the world. It reaches many, as it did in the first century, but, the majority are like the man in the parable, they hear, but they do not listen. This will continue to happen until the Lord shall return to fulfill the promises of old. We must still make every effort to deliver the message of the good news to come. We have no idea who will stop and listen. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

22:1    That Jesus ‘answered’ tells us that the parable which follows is a response to the events at the end of chapter 21


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.16 The Herodians were members of the Jewish aristocracy who followed the principles of Herod Antipas.  This group supported the Roman government.  Their question Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not? (v.17) was designed to trap Jesus into revealing Himself as seditious against Rome.  He did not fall for their ruse but showed that by obeying the laws of the land one was serving Yahweh (see Titus 3:1).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

V.41-45 - 'The Lord [i.e. God] said to my Lord [i.e. Christ] "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet"'. This quotes Psalm 110:1 where there are two different Hebrew names used for Lord that help clarify this passage. Christ was descended from David Luke 3:23-37 - Heli was the father of Mary. 


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Charles

22:12 This the second ‘friend’ in Jesus’ parables in this last week of Jesus’ life. The first was in Matt 20:13. Possibly an appeal to Judas who is the only person Jesus actually calls ‘friend’ – Matt 26:50


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.2-7 Jesus came, initially, to save His people Israel (Matt 15:24).  However, the Jews rejected Jesus' invitation to join Him in His marriage feast.  They would be punished and their city burned (Jerusalem 70 AD). 

Vs.9,10 And so, Jesus opened His invitation to the Gentiles (Acts 13:46).  They would be gathered from all over.  As guests to the wedding they would have been given a wedding garment.  It was up to them to put it on. 

Vs.11-13 One person, who was invited, decided not to put his garment on and was unfit to remain at the marriage feast.  He was promptly ejected. 

We all have an invitation to attend Jesus' marriage feast (eternal life).  But we must put on the acceptable clothing (covering).  That garment is Jesus (Gal 3:27).  To ensure that we are properly dressed at all times, we must check to make sure not to soil our garment (Jude 1:23). 

When the king comes in He will inspect His guests (judgement).  Only those who are wearing the correct garment, which has been kept clean (Rev 3:4), will be allowed to stay.  All others will be ejected.  Out of the many who have received a wedding invitation, some will fail to put on the wedding garment; others will put it on but fail to keep it clean.  After inspection, only a comparative few will be allowed to stay (Matt 22:14).  Let's make sure of where we stand (2Pet 1:10).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
treating our neighbor - Matt 22:34-40;Matt 5:43-48;Matt 5:16;Matt 10:32-33;Phil 2:16.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles
obeying laws of the land - Matt 22:17-21;Rom 13:1-7;1Pet 2:13.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

22:40-41The events of Mark 12:28-34 fit in between these verses. It seems that after the lawyer had asked his question the scribe, in a different frame of mind, asked the same question.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter