January 28

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Genesis  46 and 47
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Genesis 46 online in the King James Version Listen to Genesis 47 online in the King James Version
Listen to Genesis 46 online in the New International Version Listen to Genesis 47 online in the New International Version

 

47v.30 I thought a map might give a clue about the sort of effort involved in all the movement backwards and forwards between Canaan and Egypt. Now at the end of Jacob's life, a further journey presents to take him back to Machpelah before Mamre, which is Hebron (Gen.23:19), which I've marked on the map. Sarah was buried there - 23:19 - so was Abraham - 25:9 - so were Isaac and Rebekah and Leah - 49:31 and now Jacob wishes to join them and wait for the Kingdom of God, where we hope to meet him. Matt.22:32


Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
46 v.2 - The phrase 'Here am I' seems to carry with it more than simply telling another of your physical presence. It is used 16 times and each time it is in the context of a person giving their service to another - here to God. It suggests an absolute willingness - a characteristic we do well to develop! - Gen. 22:7,11, 31:1, 37:13, Exo.3:4, 1Sam 3:4-8, Isa.6:8
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
ch 46 - Notice the way in which Jacob / Israel is used in this chapter
Israel :1, 2 , 29, 30.
Jacob :2, 5.
It is as if, against the news that Joseph is alive, Jacob oscillates between struggling with the news and rejoicing that it is true.

47:27 The way that Israel multiplied in Goshen is setting the scene for the affliction which was to follow which was, in itself, the process that would bring abut the Exodus. God is still at work!


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

46:34 We have another piece of language which is used in Zechariah 13. 'trade … youth' is found in Zechariah 13:5 - we should build up the links between different parts of Scripture so that we can then let Scripture expound itself.

47:28 Joseph was 17 when he was sold into Egypt (Genesis 37:2) and he spends 17 years with his father in Egypt. So Joseph has two 17 year periods with his father.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Genesis 46:4 - "I will go down with thee into Egypt; and I will also surely bring thee up again" - What a brilliant comfort the hope of the resurrection is for all God's people. It is true that Jacob's bones were finally interred in the land promised to he and his fathers - but the laying of his bones to rest in the dust of the earth is not what is here referred to. "I will surely bring you up again" refers surely, to that resurrection to glory that every child of God is comforted with, when they, with the Patriarchs of old, shall inherit the land of promise.

Genesis 46:30 - "And Israel said unto Joseph, Now let me die, since I have seen thy face" - What was Joseph's Egyptian title again? "Saviour of the World" - Jacob, having laid his eyes once more on the Son of his love, the one who was named by him "Increaser," who was sent before his face to preserve life in Egypt (World) - John 3:16 - is now content to go to his grave in God's good time. Jacob actually lived a further 17yrs in the land of Goshen, matching the number of years that Joseph had spent in the family compound in the land, before being cruelly sold off into slavery as a mere lad. Was Simeon, many years later, thinking of this incident recorded here in Jacob's life as he took the infant Jesus into his arms? - Luke 2:30. And if so, why?

Genesis 47:9  - "And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage are a hundred and thirty years: few and evil have the days of the years of my life been" - There are those who imagine that if only they could live longer, perhaps they might achieve a better standing before God. Though Jacob lived twice the life span most of us might expect today, his own summary of his days is that they were "few and evil." It is a blessing that 70yrs is our allotted span, and in that time is more than enough opportunity to sufficiently come to grips with the awesome Grace of God, and to embrace His righteousness with an attitude of gratitude.


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
Gen 46.28 - 'And he sent Judah before him' - Why? because Judah has overcome and shown clearly to his father his is now a new man, and he is worthy to lead the family. Is he then, not worthy of the title of having 'prevailed above his brethren' (1 Chron 5.2) and to be the father of the chief ruler - Christ (ch 49:10)
Jared Schipper [Perth Ascot (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Jared

46:4 Jacob’s concern about going down to Egypt is allayed by God who reminds him of the promise to Abram ‘bring thee up again’ quoting Gen 15:16

47:9 In saying that he was 130 years old he would doubtless have surprised Pharaoh as the average life expectancy in Egypt at this time was only around 60 years.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

God says different things to different people. Jacob was told to go into Egypt Gen 46:3,4 but his father Isaac had been told not to go there Gen 26:2.  This is a useful principle.  Perhaps The Lord has richly blessed us, say, in building a Meeting Room, or personally in getting a job, but it doesn't always follow that we shouldn't move in the future.  (The difficulty is obviously working out what God wants us to do. We need faith AND works.)


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
Gen 46:2  "Here am I." This is more than a physical willingness. It suggests an absolute willingness to give complete service to God.  
ABRAHAM
JOSEPH
MOSES
SAMUEL
ISAIAH


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

46:27 It is stated that seventy people came to Israel.  Actually, it was sixty-six, but if you add Jacob (as head of Israel), plus Joseph and his two sons Ephraim and Manasseh, who were counted as sons by Jacob (48:5).  That totals seventy.  But, Stephen counts seventy-five (Acts 7:14).  Stephen is accounting for the two sons of Manasseh, and the three sons of Ephraim who were born in Egypt (1Chron 7:14-20).  All these were included in the nation of Israel.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
46:1 Beer-sheba which means"well of an oath" was in his direct route to Egypt. It had been an encampment of Abraham (Gen 21:33) and of Isaac (Gen 26:25) and was memorable for their experience of the Divine goodness. Jacob appears to have deferred his devotions till he had reached a spot so consecrated by covenant to his God and the God of his fathers. It was here that we see a virtual renewal of the covenant that had been made to both Abraham and Isaac. (V.2)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
46:3 - Here we see God reassuring Jacob that this time it is OK to go to Egypt, as this time it is God's plan that he should do this.  Abraham did this, and it seems it was probably his own decision, and it caused him grief. It seems, from this answer of God's, that this was the reason for the sacrifices of v.1, that God might answer his anxiety.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

47:19 - If we don't follow Christ we will perish. Believers lives are not their own to do with as they please, our lives and the land we hope to live eternally in was bought by Christ. We are to be slaves to Christ who nourishes us. We owe Christ everything.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

46:8-27  This section is, it might seem, superfluous to the narrative. One point that flows from the list of names is the degree to which God had already blessed Jacob in line with the promises that God had made to Abraham and his seed that he would multiply them - Gen 17:2 for example.

47:2 I wonder which five brethren Joseph presented to Pharaoh. Any Biblically supported suggestions?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
FOOD
 
It was all about food. The Egyptians needed food to survive. When it comes down to the line, there is nothing more important for life than food. Without food our days are numbered, and in death anything else we own - our lands, possessions and riches - have no use at all to us. While we detest paying a high price for food, we will pay all we have got for this valuable resource.
 
The famine in Egypt was so severe that the Egyptians completely ran out of food. They came to Joseph and spent first their money, then their livestock, then their lands and their lives on food just to keep themselves alive. In those seven years of famine they must have had some very expensive meals!
 
Like the Egyptians, we cannot do without food. If we were in the same situation everything we owned would seem small in value compared to having something to eat.
 
Food is one aspect, but to truely live we also need spiritual food. Spiritual food is made up of listening to God by reading his word and meditating on it, talking to him in prayer and by putting his instructions into practice in our lives. But how much do we crave spiritual food? Would we give our all for it? Would we sell all we have to keep hold of it, or to have another spiritual meal? Spiritual food will save us for eternal life. Let's consider it precious.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Robert

47:9 Jacob describes his life as being of days which were ‘few and evil’ however when he blessed Joseph’s sons he seems to have a different thing to say – Gen 48:15 – ‘the angel which redeemed me …’ Maybe by the time he came to bless the lads he appreciated more fully how God had been working in his life.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

46:30   Israel here is seen to have been harbouring the hope that Joseph was still alive all these years – so maybe he never actually believed the story that his other sons brought to him.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

The Israelites settled in Goshen where the city of Rameses was located (47:11).  Later, when the Israelites became slaves, they were forced to build Rameses as a store city (Exo 1:11).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael
46:34 'for every shepherd is an abomination unto the Egyptians', shepherds were an abomination to the general Egyptian populus as they were a reminder to who really ruled their kingdom (the Hyksos shepherd kings).  We and our families should be proclaiming ourslelves as shepherds in the sight of Egypt (the world) as reminders that God rules in the kingdoms of men.  This will make us an abomination to those who do not want to be reminded that it is indeed God who rules over the kingdoms and man is not in control to do as he wishes, but this in itself helps to seperate us and our families from the world.
Pete Barrett [Milnsbridge UK]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Pete

46:2 I will make of thee a great nations encouraged Jacob with the words that God spoke to Abram – Gen 12:2


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

47:24 The Egyptians were to pay one-fifth of their crop yield to Pharaoh their landowner.  One-fifth became a supplement under the Law of Moses (e.g. Lev 6:5; 22:14; 27:15 etc.).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
6. 12 tribes of Israel descended from the 12 sons of Israel. They remained in Egypt until the 400 years expired. Gen 15:13 Gen 47:27-31 Exo 1
Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past

Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

46:34 It seems to be a comment upon the way that Egypt was that "every shepherd is an abomination unto the Egyptians" however it highlights a fundamental feature of the works of darkness – for that is what Egypt was. The God of Israel shepherded His people. His son was the ‘good shepherd’ – John 10:1 - The care that God and His son have for the children of God is the exact opposite of the influence of ‘Egypt’ upon those children. So even though the picture we see now is one of generosity towards Israel we will see in due course that ‘Egypt’ persecuted the children of God. As it was then so it is now.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
46:34  To add to brother Peter's recent comment: Moses was undoubtedly an abomination (Strong's: an abhorrence) to Egypt and Exo 3:1 reminds us that Moses was literally a shepherd.  In fact, Moses tried to avoid being an abomination to the Egyptians: Exo 8:26.  Israel were an even greater abomination after the events of Exo 9:1-7 when the Egyptians' sheep were destroyed and Israel's were not.
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken

The Capabilities of the Soul as Mentioned in the Bible

The word "soul" is used variously in Scripture to describe the actual person, the mind, disposition, life - subject to the principle of mortality. The word is from the Hebrew "nephesh" in the Old Testament, and the Greek "psuche" in the New Testament. Some of its usages indicate that the soul:

Is born (Gen 46:18,27), can eat (Exo 12:16 note margin;Deut 12:20;Lev 17:10-12;Luke 12:19), eats bread (Hos 9:4), must die (Psa 22:29), has a mouth (Psa 103:2-5), has lips (Lev 5:4), has blood (Jer 2:34), can thirst (Psa 42:2), can be idle (Prov 19:15), weeps (Jer 13:17), can touch (Lev 5:2), can be touched (Num 19:11 note margin), can die (Josh 11:11;Eze 18:4), can be smitten with the sword (Josh 11:11), can be pierced (Luke 2:35), can be put in a pit (Job 33:18;Isa 38:17), goes into the grave (Psa 86:13;Psa 56:13), needs redemption (Psa 49:15), needs a resurrection (Psa 89:48;Psa 49:15)

Thus the Bible clearly teaches that man is mortal; that his existence is limited (Psa 144:3-4), and is destined to death (Psa 89:48). His only hope of a future existence is through a resurrection (1Cor 15:50), and a change to divine nature by the miraculous and singular work of Jesus Christ (Phil 3:21) when he returns from heaven.

The above from The Story of the Bible by G.E Mansfield, V.3, P.272.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Psalm 50
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 50 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 50 online in the New International Version

 

v.2 - Here we have a number of rare words - perfection (miklal - 04359) is only here, but its root word is used in similar circumstances in Eze. 27:4,11 (and nowhere else). The word for beauty (yophiy - 03308) only has 19 occurrences eg. Ps.45:11, Est.1:11, Prov.6:25, and shined is a special word too (yapha` - 03313) only 8 times in scripture eg. Deut 33:2, Ps.80:1, Ps.94:1(show). Of course we realise in retrospect that it is the work of Christ through which God will shine. 2Cor.4:6


Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.5 - Matt.24:31 - When we receive our calling will we too hold the misunderstanding Bro. Peter mentions below? It seems that this is the major lesson of this Psalm, that we might worship and praise the Lord out of a recognition not of His need for praise or sacrifice, but of our own need, that He has seen fit to show us, to achieve that humble and contrite spirit He seeks.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:8-13 Israel had a serious misconception. They thought that God needed their animal sacrifices. The Psalmist is correcting this misunderstanding saying that what God wants is our praise :14. We need to understand that our worship of God and attendance at the meetings is not for God's benefit. It is for ours and we should praise Him for this.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Psalm 50 - "A Psalm of Asaph" - are the first words of this Psalm. "Asaph" means 'to gather, or collect.' The theme of this Psalm is the gathering of God's children before Him for Judgement. Thus the language used is universal, and not limited to Israel in the land - "called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof" - All the inhabitants of the earth, from one end to the other: whom El Elohim Yahweh [to use the titles of God here given]  summons to be witnesses of His proceedings in this solemn judgment, between Him and His people, which is here poetically represented. For here is a tribunal erected, the judge coming to it, the witnesses and delinquents summoned, and at last the sentence given.

 v17 - "Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee" - This will undoubtedly be manifest as one of the great issues of the ages. It started in the garden of Eden when Adam failed to keep God's words before him. And it is alluded to in the picture of judgement given in Matthew 25: 1-12 where the foolish virgins are exposed as they who have not sufficient oil [God's word] in their lamps [active lives]. Hypocrisy is wickedness, which God will soon judge. And it is sadly too common, for those who declare the Lord's statutes to others, to live in disobedience to them themselves.


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
50:2 Whilst Zion was ‘the perfection of beauty’ that beauty was spoiled (Lam 2:15) through the unwillingness of Israel to appreciate the message of this Psalm.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Psalm 50  The theme of this Psalm is the gathering of them before God for judgement. The key words are "call"  V.1, 4, 15. and "gather"  V.5.

The headings of the Psalm "the pleasure of God is not in ceremonies." and "but in sincerity of obedience" bring back to mind the words of Samuel to Saul. "Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice and to hearken than the fat of rams" 1Sam 15:22 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
THANK OFFERINGS
 
I heard an advertisement on Christian radio yesterday inviting people to a seminar on prayer.  It's focus was on making your prayers powerful - no longer wondering if God would answer your prayers but putting power into your prayers to make things happen.  But there was something missing in the definition of prayer that was put forward.  Prayer was said to be a time to ask God for help and to get him working for you.  But prayer is not just a time to ask and to get God to do what we want him to do.  He is not our servant.  We are his servants put here on earth to give him glory.  It is not God that should be helping with our plans, it should be us doing our best to do what he wants us to do.
 
Power in prayer has its place if we are working for God, but the part that is missing is that prayer must also be a time of giving thanks and praise for all the blessings God has already given us.  Giving thanks is often lacking in our prayers.  With all that God has done for us, we should be the most thankful people in the world!  Praise and thanks should be constantly on our lips.  Are they?
 
The one offering that God specifically asks for in this psalm is the thank offering. "Sacrifice thank offerings to God, fulfill your vows to the Most High." (Psa 50:14)  And, "He who sacrifices thank offerings honours me." (v.23)  Then, God says, he will deliver us and show us salvation.  Let's offer him our thanks right now!

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Robert
In v.7 God says He will testify against them, and yet in Psa 81:8 He says He will testify for them.  All it takes is a humbling of our attitude for God to turn around and cover our sins.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
God owns the world. Can I suggest that the next time you see a cow, just stop and remember today's Psalm. "The cattle upon a thousand hills" are God's.  (Psa 50:10).
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
 
V.5 - this second coming reference doesn't suggest only saints will be gathered Matt 8:11-12

Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

50:14,23           The Psalmist associates the way we live with the things we say to God in prayer and praise. He indicates tat the two must be in harmony with each other.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

50:1 ‘from the rising of the sun … going down thereof’ is actually quoted – Mal 1:11 – to speak of the way in which God will be made known throughout all the world. That is also the context here in the Psalm.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
Even though the Psalm is written with God as its subject. (note "Himself" Psa 50:6), it does not cloud our understanding of God manifestation, and from the teaching of scripture we know that it is Christ, not God, who will return to the earth to judge it, and to establish the kingdom. John 5:22 clearly shows that God has committed this work to His Son. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

50:5 The sacrifice that the ‘saints’ have made – or should have made – is their willing sacrifice – Rom 12:1 – because of the redemption that is in Christ.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

50:14 In saying ‘pay thy vows ...’ the Psalmist is contrasting that with Israel’s attitude to their sacrifices. Whereas they thought the animal sacrifices were because of some need that God had they should realise that they were to be offered because of a need that the offerer had.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Asaph (collector) was responsible for producing Psalms 50; 73-83.  He was the leader of David's choir (1Chron 6:19).  He is also mentioned, alongside David, as being a skilled musician (2Chron 29:30).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

50:17 That the people cast God’s words behind them is an idea which Nehemiah picks up – Neh 9:28


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

Jesus' New Testament teaching can all be derived from the Old Testament.

For example, there are two parties in this chapter who go to court to accuse someone. In v4-8 God accuses His people. And the reason for his accusation is that they are an unmerciful people, condemning even their own family members (v19-20). Was Jesus thinking about this psalm when he said "Judge not, that you be not judged"? (Matt 7:1-3). Can you think of any other teaching he may have derived from this psalm?


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob

50:1  What great emphasis in the phrase, "The mighty God, the LORD."  Literally translated, it's El Elohim, Jehovah.  The phrase occurs in only one other part of Scripture: Josh 22:22.

 


Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken
Reading 3 - Romans  3 and 4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Romans 3 online in the King James Version Listen to Romans 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to Romans 3 online in the New International Version Listen to Romans 4 online in the New International Version

 

3 v.2 - "Unto them were committed the oracles of God" Deut.4:7,8, Neh.9:13,14, Psalm 78:4-7. What a privilege they spurned. It is from this that we must learn. It is so clear in Ezekiel 20 - v.11,12 restate just what we have seen in the other passages but then v. 13 shows us their rebellion, which led to God's anger. It is the same God that we worship now.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
3:4 The quotation 'that thou mightest be justified ...' from Psalm 51:4 marks the beginning of an appeal to the repentance of David after his adultery with Bathsheba - see the title of the Psalm. This incident in David's life, as terrible as it was, marks the magnitude of the Father's forgiveness towards a repentant sinner. More notes on this in Romans 4.
3:23,24 These adjacent verses are at the opposite ends of the spectrum as far as the mind of man is concerned. One has to recognise the situation outlined in v 23 before one can be in the state described in v 24. Justification is only available to those who recognise their own personal need for salvation.
4:3 'Abraham believed God ...' the quotation is from Gen. 15:6. Righteousness is imputed by God on the basis of faith, not works of the law. Gen. 15 predates the giving of the law. This is the thrust of the argument in verses 4:4,5 and circumcision - the implications of this are developed in Rom.4:9-13.
4:6-8 The appeal to Psalm 32:1-2 which is a Psalm that David wrote after Nathan had spoken of God's forgiveness for David's adultery [2 Sam.12:13] continues the theme of forgiveness from ch. 3:4 We should take great comfort from the fact that God was willing to forgive the repentant David.
4:18 'against hope believed in hope' tells us that Abraham had to have faith in the promise of the seed as it was humanly speaking impossible.
4:23 The implication from 'now it was not written for his sake alone ...' is that Abraham had a written copy of the promise.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

3:1 'What advantage then hath the Jew' is asked by Paul because in Chapter 1 & 2 he has powerfully demonstrated that the history of Israel's behaviour shows that they were sinful. Against that background a gentile might well think that there was no value in being Jewish which would undermine the clear Biblical teaching that the Jews are God's special people. Paul goes on to develop his argument to show that the benefit of being a Jew comes only from believing the things that God has said.

4:23 In saying 'it was not written …' Paul is indicating that Abraham had his own written copy of the promise contained in Genesis 15.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Romans 3:9 - "for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin" - in chapters one and two. Paul painted a word picture, first of the Gentile world - Romans 1 - then the Jewish world, which was even worse, for they had access to God's righteousness - Romans 2.

v12-18 - Paul describes the cadaver of sin. As Paul's scalpel opens up the body of sin, first the throat, then the tongue, lips, mouth, feet, and eyes are laid bare and examined - Hebrews 4:12-13. And Paul's conclusion is given in v23 - "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God."  What does this tell us? We all need Jesus Christ. No-one will be in God's Kingdom who has not entrusted his life and his salvation to the only name given among men whereby they might be saved - Acts 4:12.

Romans 4 - To meet the views of the Jews, the apostle first refers to the example of Abraham, in whom the Jews gloried as their most renowned forefather. However exalted in various respects, he had nothing to boast in the presence of God, for he too was saved by grace, through faith, even as others. Without noticing the years which passed before his call, and the failures at times in his obedience, and even in his faith, it was expressly stated in the Scripture that "he believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness," Genesis 15:6. From this example it is observed, that if any man could work the full measure required by the law, the reward must then be reckoned as a debt, which evidently was not the case even of Abraham, seeing faith was reckoned to him for righteousness.

 It is clear from the Scripture, that Abraham was justified several years before his circumcision. This then is Paul's point to those who prided themselves on their pedigree and/or on the very private mark they received in their flesh whilst they were too young to effectively protest otherwise. It is, therefore, plain that this circumcision was not necessary in order to that justification which is by faith.

___________________________________________________

It is truly fascinating to reflect on the great wisdom of the Father as one reads the 3 portions of Scripture each day, and often there runs a "Golden Thread" through them all. For example, one of the Golden Threads evident today, is the concept, that we can only be Justified by the Grace of God. Paul deals in great detail with the subject, of course, in Romans, Joseph in his life revealed how great a force faith in God is the life of each of His saints - Genesis 47:12, and the Psalmist captured the same beautifully in the closing verse of Psalm 50 - "Whoso offers praise glorifies me: and to him that orders his conversation aright, will I show the salvation of God."


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

3:3 Paul (2Tim 2:13) develops the principles of this verse for the benefit of Timothy.

4 - We he noted before that David’s Psalm (32) is used by Paul to speak of the way in which God forgives. Reflecting on what David had done – committed adultery and murdered a man – we probably cannot think of two more evil crimes. But it is these two crimes which God forgave which forms the basis of Paul’s encouragement to us.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Rom 3:25  "to declare his  rightousness." Christ, the bearer of the sins of the people. NOT that Christ might be punished for others, but that God's rightousness might be declared for others to see that they might be forgiven.

Rom 4:7  As we read from Psa 32 the other day, and as we read from Psa 51 tomorrow, we can clearly see, and appreciate that the confesson of sin is not seeking forgiveness, it acknowledges the rightousness of our Heavenly Father. We must also be aware of the fact, that our failings can not be forgiven unless we are prepared to acknowledge them.

Rom 4:17  "I have made thee a father of many nations." Paul is quoting from Gen 17:5  Sarah was still barren at this time, but we see that this is written in the past tense. This was foreordained. There is a difference between pre-existance and being foreordained. The seed of Abraham, both Issac and Christ were foreordained. 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
Paul; the writer to the Hebrews; James; and Peter all talk about Abraham. He was the patriarch of the physical Jewish nation and also father of the faithful (4:16).
He was given the promises before the Law (Gen 17:5-8) - even before his circumcision (Gen 17:24).  The particular seed of his promise was Christ who fulfilled the Law (Matt 5:17, Gal 3:16).  However, God still has a covenant with the Jewish nation and the land of Israel even though they have not (yet) accepted Christ.  It is a mistake to believe, as some groups do, that any prophetical reference or future application concerning the Land and people of Israel is purely spiritual and not physical.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
3:4 - Here we see a principle that we cannot ignore.  Let God be true is a clear instruction to us not to make God into what we think He should be - not to impose on Him what we feel are the qualities of a god, but instead to open our minds to let Him show us what he really is in truth.  We are still on the theme from the previous chapters which tell us how to avoid being like those whose worship is distorted.  Let us take heed, as through this we can be justified by faith, as we are being prepared to learn next.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

3:20 tells us that the law can't save because by it there is knowledge of sin.  This shows us that the law is inextricably tied up with the original curse - that we should know good and evil.  At the end this curse will be removed and we will know only good.  We do well to remember that this knowledge of good and evil is a curse, not a privilege.  One day, those who are saved, will leave it far behind.  One could argue that by God's grace, we already have - 5:21, 6:7 - but in that day it will be actual.  Evil will no longer be remembered or contemplated or come into mind.  We must ask ourselves: Are we ready to leave behind the choice to do evil, without looking back, or do we still consider it a privilege?


Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

3:2        If the Jews had a benefit simply because the Word of God was committed to them how do we view that same word? Do we feel privileged simply because we can read Scripture freely in our own tongue?

 

4:11      Whilst Israel seemed to see circumcision as the ultimate test of Jewishness Paul clearly says here that it is a sign of what has already been seen in Abraham – that is his faith in God which was counted for righteousness.

 

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
4:21 All promises that have been made by God, he is able to perform, certainly different from promises made by man. God never forgets a promise, while man frequently forgets, God's promises are priceless, while promises of man are often times useless, God's promises are always right, while mans are often wrong.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
Rom 3:9-20 has at least 7 quotations from the Psalms, and one from Isaiah. Then in Rom 4 we can find 7 times when Abraham’s name is written.  There is no doubt, is there, where the Gospel’s foundation is laid?

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

3:5 This is the first of a number of occasions when Paul asks a question which he then answers himself. The others are Rom 4:1,  6:1, 7:7 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

4:2      In questioning Abraham’s righteousness Paul develops the point that he made in Rom 2:13 showing that the law does not bring righteousness.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

3:4‘that thou … art judged’ is a quotation from Psa 51:4 That Psalm is a Psalm speaking specifically of David’s sin with Bathsheba. Paul highlights that the Psalm, though specifically speaking to David, actually has a general application to all.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
For many of us the intricate arguments of scripture are too much to grasp. That's why we're given Abraham as an example. All we need to do is read about his life, emulate what we see, and we will obtain the same promises as him. Rom 4:3, 11-12, 16, 20-25.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

3:19 The phrase ‘every mouth may be stopped’ echoes the sentiments of Psa 143:12 thus demonstrating that the teaching that all men are sinners is not confined to the New Testament but is a clear Old Testament teaching.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter