January 30

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Exodus  1 and 2
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Exodus 1 online in the King James Version Listen to Exodus 2 online in the King James Version
Listen to Exodus 1 online in the New International Version Listen to Exodus 2 online in the New International Version

 

1 v.11 - The word for 'burdens' here (c'balah - 05450) is peculiar to Exodus and this situation - It means 'forced labour' or 'compulsory service' and is used 6 times, here, 2:11, 5:4,5, 6:6,7. This is the affliction prophesied to Abraham in Gen 15:13 (Why did God choose to reveal this to Abraham?). This 'hard bondage' as it is described in v. 14 is mentioned using the exact same two hebrew words 6 times - 3 times about Egypt - here (hard bondage), 6:9 (cruel bondage) Deut.26:2 (hard bondage) - twice about the request made to Rehoboam not to be like his father (parallel passages) - 1Kings 12:4 (grievous service) 2Chron.10:14 (grievous servitude) - but then lastly in Isa.14:1-3 when it is to cease.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
2 v.10 - Notice that Moses, even though named not thus by his parents, but by Pharaoh's daughter, does not have his name changed by God, even though God uses him for a very special purpose. On this occasion, it seems, the Egyptian name (as presumably it was) was acceptable to Him.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Chapter 1 - There are strong verbal links between this chapter and Genesis 15
:11 afflict Genesis 15:13
:12 afflicted Genesis 15:13
:13 `serve Genesis 15:13
Which begins to show that the Exodus from Egypt was a fulfilment of the promise made to Abraham in Genesis 15. We will return to this theme in the early chapters of Exodus as appropriate.

2:24 Covenant with Abraham Genesis 15:18
2:18 the 'Reuel' here spoken of is elsewhere called 'Jethro' so this is the beginning of the relationship between Jethro and Moses which develops through this book


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
MY TIME, MY WAY

Moses, in a position of high authority in Egypt, saw his own people in slavery. An Egyptian was beating a Hebrew and Moses delivered the Hebrew by killing the Egyptian. Many people think that at this stage Moses was ready to deliver his people from Egypt. He had not been commanded by God to do so but he began to go ahead anyway.

Moses tried to save his people at the time he thought best and in the only way he knew. But even though Moses had great authority in Egypt, he had physical strength and the ability to draw together an army, and even though he was motivated to save his people - it was not God's time or God's way. When it came to the right time and the right way 40 years later, Moses didn't feel qualified or ready, but it was right for God.

There can often be times in our lives when we think the time and the method are right for the changes we see that we think are needed. But if the time or method are not God's ways then our plans will be fruitless. God will work out his plan but he will do it in his way and in his time - not ours. So let us be sure to do what we do in God's way and in his time. By doing that we are bound for success.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert

1:9 Do we really think that there were more Jews in Egypt than Egyptians at this time? Or was it simply a ruse to destroy the Jews?

2:10 'The child grew' might seem to be a very causal comment. However it passes into Biblical use in a very significant way speaking of men who became faithful servants of God Judges 13:24 1 Samuel 2:21,26 Luke 1:80 2:40 and has it's origins in Genesis 21:8


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Exodus 1:1- "Now these are the names" - Better "And these are the names..." Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers all start with "And" linking all these books together in one flowing narrative. Having travelled in Genesis from life in Paradise to death in Egypt, Exodus introduces us to the creation theme again. In the first few chapters of Exodus we will find new life being formed in the land of Egypt, the seed of the woman prevailing, King Sin reigning, death highlighted, along with hard labour etc.

Exodus 1:8 - "which knew not Joseph" - a change of dynasty in Egypt. Not so much that the new Pharaoh had not heard of Joseph, but that he did not acknowledge any obligation to him.  We may therefore understand by the new king’s not knowing Joseph, his disapproving of that system of government which Joseph had established, as well as his haughtily refusing to acknowledge the obligations under which the whole land of Egypt was laid to this eminent prime minister of one of his predecessors.

Exodus 1:12 - "Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens" - One of the themes of this portion of Exodus is, "Whose house is being built?" This Pharaoh was all out to build himself great treasure houses, but in v21 we learn that God was making "houses or families" for the children of Israel.

Exodus 1:16 - "if it be a son, then ye shall kill him" - The grand plans of Pharaoh are thrown into a real spin, as we read the record from here and make a note of what women (including his own daughter) do, which completely undoes all his schemes. The strength of God is truly made perfect in weakness.

[Peter's Note: Cliff has produced a Word document - a Bible insert which is a timeline for the book of Exodus. Click here to display or download it (which happens depends on your browser and your settings). It is a single page (86.7K) with two copies of the insert. Please print off and distribute if you wish. Our thanks to Bro. Cliff for this work. The required paper size is A4.]


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

1:8 Given what Joseph had done for Egypt and the fact that this could not have been more than 100 years or so after Joseph it is difficult to understand ‘know’ as meaning other than that this new king did not regard what Joseph had done as being because of his faith in his God.

2:3 The place of vulnerability of Moses – by the river’s brink became the place of conflict (7:15) when Moses confronted Pharaoh some 80 years later.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

1:7 Notice the 4 words to indicate the increase in Israel’s numbers. 70 people went down to Egypt, and 2,500,000 went out. (Num 1:46 the soldiers were 603,550. Multiply this by at least 4 for a wife, 2 children, elderly parents, maiden aunt etc = 2,400,000, and round it off = 2½ million)


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
Exo 2:24  We saw with Joseph earlier this week that God does not forget his people. (Gen 41) This verse goes one step further. We are shown that God not only does not forget His people, He also hears their pleas.We must always remember, however bleak or dark it may be, that He (God) will not fail thee, or forsake thee Deut 31:6  
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

The following opinion assumes that the Hyksos kings were in power at the time of Joseph's sojourn in Egypt. 

The Hyksos kings had ruled the delta region of Egypt, where Goshen was, while the native Egyptian kings ruled southern Egypt.  A war arose between the two groups in which the Egyptian kings defeated the Hyksos.  The Hyksos, who were kindly disposed to the Israelites, were expelled.  However, the native Egyptians were contemptuous of Semites, which accounts for the hostility of the new ruler towards the Hebrews (1:8).  It is suggested that this new ruler was Rameses Miamun or his son Amenophis who succeeded him about 1604 BC. The date for Moses birth has been given at 1525 BC (although some sources cite a later date). 

Moses means drawn out of the water.  He was saved by water in an ark just as Noah was saved in his.  This is a figure of baptism which also saves us (1Pet 3:20,21). 
Moses is a type of Christ, and right away there is an echo of Pharaoh's attempt to kill him (1:16) with the attempt of Herod to kill Jesus (Matt 2:16).
Moses went into exile to Midian for forty years.  The number forty is associated with trial.  The flood was forty days upon the earth (Gen 7:17); the temptation of Jesus lasted forty days (Mark 1:13). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

Exodus 2:6
"This is one of the Hebrews' children"
The famous movie with Charleston Heston shows a piece of cloth in the basket as being Hebrew threads, but I believe that the identity was most likely because of circumcision.


Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Matt
1:17 - It is easy to do as the king commands - much less easy to have the courage to go against the law of the land when you know that what you do is for God.  These were women of faith who laid their lives on the line for their God, just as all people of faith should.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
1:17 - We have an attempt to kill male children just as with Jesus. We also have an example of how important a role women can play in God's plan as Peter Cresswell touched on. 2:2,3,10 - Possibly some echos of Christ and the sacrifice/resurrection by which people are led from the slavery of sin and death to the promised land. We have the number three. We have an ark type construction coated with pitch over water  kind of a mini version of Noah's wooden ark where 8 were saved with the washing away of sin much like baptism and saved by the wooden ark (wooden cross?). Moses means drawn out as he was drawn out of water (a symbolic grave/baptism/resurrection?) and thus saved.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

1:7       In saying ‘Israel were fruitful’ we are being asked to consider that the promise to Abraham – Gen 12:2 – is still being fulfilled even though Israel were not in the land of Israel.

 

2:22      In saying ‘I have been a stranger in a strange land’ Moses is reflecting on the promise that God made to Abraham Gen 15:13


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
2:24 "God remembered' As we said a couple of days ago; God's promises can not be forgotten or broken. We have heard it expressed that one of the few things that God can not do, is to brake a promise. These promises provide assurance and comfort to all true believers.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

1:1-6This section of this chapter summarises the background to the affliction of the book of Exodus. In saying ‘Joseph died’ we are seeing a link with Gen 49:26 where Joseph died. So whilst the book of Exodus follows on from the end of Genesis there must be a time gap between the books of around 100 years.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

2:3    We learn a little here about life in Egypt in the days of Moses. Bathing was done in the river therefore we can conclude that even in Pharaoh’s palace there were no bathing facilities.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

1:10 ‘Deal wisely’ – so political ‘spin’ is hardly new!


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

2:1 Moses father was Amram who married Jochabed (Num 26:59).

2:4 Miriam was probably about ten or twelve years old.

2:5 The daughter of Pharaoh was Thermuthis according to Josephus. The Nile was considered sacred by the Egyptians; and so, it is not clear whether this act of washing (bathing) was religious or a matter of hygiene.

2:11 Moses was now forty years old (Acts 7:23).

2:18 Ruel is alternatively called Raguel (Num 10:29); Jethro (Exo 3:1); Hobab (Judg 4:11). However, on further examination, Hobab would appear to be the son of Raguel (Num 10:29).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
6. 12 tribes of Israel descended from the 12 sons of Israel. They remained in Egypt until the 400 years expired. Gen 15:13 Gen 47:27-31 Exo 1
Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past

Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

Exo 2:14;Acts 7:27-28.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

1:15-19 Given the midwives could have killed the children after they were born even if the midwife arrived after the birth it would seem, reading between the lines, that the Egyptians wanted to make the deaths appear natural.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

There is a tendency amongst those who think themselves scholarly to dismiss biblical anomalies as being a copyist error. There's one of these anomalies in Exo 1:5 (70 persons) compared to Stephen's speech in Acts 7:14 (75 persons). So where did the extra 5 people come from? The bible margin unhelpfully suggests it's an error.

But the answer is Joseph of course; because he had come to Egypt ahead of the others. This omission is confirmed in that very same verse: "for Joseph was in Egypt already". So let's check if his family comes to five:

Joseph himself, that's one. His wife, two. Their two sons, four. Ah. That makes just 4. More problems. So shall we go for a double copyist error then? Or why not just take it in faith that both passages are correct? It would be better to trust God's word than scholarly advice wouldn't it? And if we just trust, then maybe years later we would stumble on the fact that Jacob himself was the 5th person, as he's not counted in the 70 either: "these are the names of the children of Israel... descendants of Jacob" (v1,5). Let's not be quick to point the finger at the word of God, quoting so called scholars, when the answer is often in the same text we thought we had a problem with.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob
Exo 2:11-19,21,23 - in v.11 the brethren of Moses were heavily burdened and slaves (in bondage to Egypt/sin); in v.12 Moses kills an Egyptian [could this be an echo of Christ's sacrifice and how Christ dealt sin/death a mortal blow? (Gen 3:15)]; v.14 perhaps an echo of Christ being ruler and judge; v.15 Moses faced death but escaped from the head of Egypt (echo of Christ escaping from king sin/death?); vs.16-18 ["Reuel" (7467) means "friend of God"] God friendly people driven off but rescued/delivered by Moses [perhaps an echo of Christ delivering/rescuing believers and giving them living water (John 4:10,13,14)]; v.21 bridegroom and bride (echo of Christ married to believers?); v.23 during that long period the king of Egypt died (an echo that eventually there will be no sin and death?).
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
2:11  Moses had been brought up as a prince in the royal household, knowing only a privileged, regal way of life, yet here we have recorded the fact that he voluntarily turned his back on such a way of life and "went out" to his brethren. Clearly his mother had a great influence on Moses.  It must have been she who had - presumably secretly - brought him up with a knowledge and appreciation of his hebrew descent.  In worldly terms Moses' brothers would have been the other royal princes, not the hebrew slaves.
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken
Reading 2 - Psalms 53, 54 and 55
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 53 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 54 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 55 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 53 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 54 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 55 online in the New International Version

 

54 v.4 - David suffered so many occasions when he feared for his life. Surely none of us will come near to what he suffered, but we can still take comfort in the things that he took comfort in, knowing that God is on our side (Ps.118:6,7,13). David is writing about a time when he fled for his life from Saul but the inhabitants of the land which he had chosen for refuge (the Ziphites) joined with Saul in seeking him out.(1Sam.23:19,20, 26:1). This left him with no refuge but God. We take comfort in this and draw lessons from it. Isa.41:10, 50:7-9, Rom.8:31, Heb.13:6.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
Psalm 54Psalm 55 - There was a clear distinction in David's life between his friends and his enemies. We live lies, generally, where this is not so. It is much harder for us to recognise who our enemies are, and there is a danger then that we might fail to avoid joining their practices. Jesus tells us to love our enemies, but he does not tell us to join with them in their practices. We must develop the clear distinction that David had.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Psalm 53 - This Psalm almost duplicates Psalm 14. Against the background of sin and evil the Psalmist desires salvation out of Zion - :6. Is this how we think when se see the evil that is in the world?

Psalm 54 - David's own countrymen were his betrayers - Ziph was in the inheritance of Judah Josh 15:24. Even though betrayed by his own tribe David still seeks for God to bring deliverance :2. He left things in God's hands rather than seeking justice himself.

Psalm 55 - This Psalm is for instruction 'Maschil' in the title. It speaks of David's feelings when Ahithophel betrayed him. David's distress was because a friend had betrayed him :13,14. We must take care that we do not let our friends down. The closer we are to someone the greater is the pain if we fail them.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
7:22 We can all identify with Paul's struggle [7:14-20]. It is so easy to reprove ourselves because of this. Psalm 1 presents the ideal we would aim for we would be amongst those who 'delight in the law ...' [Psalm 1:2] but feel that because of the struggle which Paul identifies [v.14-20] we cannot reach such a high ideal. However Paul quotes that verse from the Psalm in 7:22 when describing how he dealt with the struggle he had. Therefore we can live up to the ideals of the Psalm even though we are struggling with 'Adam' who is seeking for supremacy in us.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Psalm 54Psalm 55Psalm 56 - THE DESTINY OF THE WICKED
These three Psalms all have graphic curses given in them for the wicked. These are people who attack the innocent, who do not care for or regard God, who manufacture suffering for others, who make violence and destruction, who lay evil plans for their neighbours, conspiring, lurking and eager to take life.
The curses in these Psalms are mostly curses in which the Psalmist asks God to do right then and there in the life of the wicked people. They are more like instantaneous actions he wants God to take against the wicked. God did answer his prayers in many of these cases and the wicked did fall before David. Ahothophel, for instance, who is referred to in Psalm 55 was cursed with "Let death take my enemies by surprise, let them go down alive to the grave, for evil finds lodging among them." Ahithophel was one of David's wisest men but after this his wisdom was not highly regarded any more and he killed himself.
But the long-term destiny of the wicked is even worse than the short term. They will not get to share in the glories of life in the kingdom of God. They will be cast out into outer darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth and death.
Is wickedness really worth it?

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert

53:6 The cry that salvation would come out of Zion is voiced against the background of the wickedness in Israel. Do we sigh for the abominations of this world and long for the restoration of Zion and the kingdom?

54:2 The Ziphites betrayed David to Saul but David prayed that God to intervene on his behalf. He did not take vengeance himself.

55:12 In lamenting and reflecting on the hurt cause by the treachery of Ahithophel David voices the deep sorrow of one betrayed by a friend. Do we think of the consequences of our actions when we choose to sin?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

7:1-4 This section of the letter is an appeal to those Jewish believers who could not see that life in Christ transcended the law of Moses.

8:14 'Led by the spirit' catches the words used to speak of Jesus' temptation (Matthew 4:1) It is not some mystical force in our lives. Rather it is that force which comes from an understanding of and desire to fulfil the will of God.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Psalm 53 - "To the chief musician upon Mahalath" - belongs properly as a subscription to Psalm 52. Psalm 53 begins with the words "Maschil, A Psalm of David." There is a remarkable resemblance between this psalm and Psalm 14:1-7. Both are ascribed to the same author, David; and each pursues the same line of thought - the folly and wickedness of Atheism. They both show that the belief that there is no God is not a harmless idea, or a mere speculation, but that it has important consequences on the life, and is naturally connected with a wicked life, Psalm 53:3-4.


Psalm 54 "To the chief musician upon Neginoth" - belongs properly as a subscription to Psalm 53. Psalm 54 begins with the words "Maschil, A Psalm of David when the Ziphims came and said to Saul, Doth not David hide himself with us?"
Ziph was a village in the southern part of Palestine. David having taken refuge in the mountains of that country, the Ziphites went to Saul, and informed him of the fact. Saul, with his army, immediately went thither, and was on one side of a mountain while David was on the other. Just when he was about to fall into the hands of his merciless pursuer, an express came to Saul that the Philistines had invaded Israel, on which he gave up the pursuit, and returned to save his country, and David escaped to En-gedi. See the account in 1Samuel 23:19-29. It is supposed to have been after this deliverance that he composed this Psalm.

Psalm 55 "To the chief musician upon Neginoth" - belongs properly as a subscription to Psalm 54. Psalm 55 begins with the words "Maschil, A Psalm of David."

Psalm 55:12-14 - " For it was not an enemy that reproached me; then I could have borne it neither was it he that hated me that did magnify himself against me; then I would have hid myself from him: But it was thou, a man mine equal, my guide, and mine acquaintance. We took sweet counsel together, and walked unto the house of God in company" - Though this Psalm was originally written by David, and the one he speaks of here is undoubtedly Ahithophel, the Psalm is also Messianic and probably provides an insight into Jesus' estimation of Judas that perhaps we might not otherwise have ascribed to that man. Was part of the bitter cup that Jesus wanted the Father to remove from Him, the bitterness of being betrayed by a friend and his kiss? - Matthew 26:28.


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

53:2 That God ‘looked down’ is rather like the way that He looked and then went down to Sodom (Gen 18:21). Of course God can see everything and could bring judgement from afar. However He involves Himself in the judgement.

54:3 Whilst we pointed out that the Ziphites were men of Judah we notice that David calls them ‘strangers’. They were strangers because they did not know David. Their hearts were set on mischief. In a similar way people we know well may well be strangers. We must appreciate that a relationship with God determines friendship and alienation.

55:14 The behaviour of Ahithophel demonstrated his hypocrisy. David had no idea of his treachery and deceit. However God did. We do well to remember that even though our brethren and sisters do not know our motives our Father does and will act in due course.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Psalm 53 In this psalm there is a plea that God would remove the "captivity of his people" V.6  This psalm is very similar to Psa 14

Psalm 54  David's prayer for God's help at the time when the Ziphites betray David's location to Saul. (1Sam 23:19)

Psalm 55  Once again a prayer of David. This would have been when Ahithophel defected to Absalom. (2Sam 15:31) You might also take a look at Psa 41


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Psalm 55 clearly outlines David's bitter disappointment over being betrayed by Ahithophel. We can well imagine our Lord's similar disappointment over Judas' betrayal. It is possible that we too might be let down at some point by someone close. How would we handle it?
The hope is that we would emulate the Lord. He knew that Judas was going to betray him and yet he continued to treat him as he did the other disciples. He left judgment to God and so should we.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
Psa 55 CHANGE
 
One of the hardest things people have to cope with is change.  We like to have our lives constant so that we are not put in uncomfortable situations where we feel out of our depth.  Change challenges us.  It forces us to re-think, take risks and live outside the box we would dearly love to call our home.  But we cannot grow without change.  Without change we would still be children living a child's life.  It is change that brings us close to God.
 
Human nature dictates to us that we should do our own thing, put ourselves first and ignore God.  It is prone to sin.  In that state we cannot be at peace with God.  We need to change our natures to become more God like and obedient to our Creator.
 
David spoke about people who resisted changing their ways for God.  He said, "God who is enthroned for ever, will hear them and afflict them - men who never change their ways and have no fear of God." (Psa 55:19)
 
The lesson for us is to allow ourselves to be changed by God to become the people he wants us to be.  In allowing those changes to happen - and making them happen - we will find ourselves outside our comfort zones, but at the same time we will be growing and maturing for the LORD our God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Robert
54:7 We sense here David's satisfaction in beholding the overthrow of his enenies, as those of God. But, does not imply any selfish feelings. Compare Psa 52:6-7  
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
53:3 - We tend to believe that this degree of unbelief is a feature of the modern age, but it seems not.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
The last verse in Psalm 53 (Psa 53:6) is one of those amazing prophetic verses.  The Psalm is written by David, so it was to be another 500 years before Judah's captivity would return from Babylon.  David really understood a lot about the future of his nation, and God's prophecies in Deut 28and other places.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
53:1-4 - God wants more than simply casually seeking Him. He wants us to diligently seek and worship Him. In v.2 we have God looking to see if any "seek" [Heb. "darash" (1875) means "to follow, to worship, to seek, search, inquirer, to ask, care for", etc.] Him. Matt 7:7 - we read "seek and ye shall find". The word "seek" used in Matt. is the Greek word "zeteo" (2212) means "to seek, to worship, desire, endeavour, enquire, seek", etc.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

53:1      Scripturally a ‘fool’ is someone who does not listen to sound instruction. Prov 10:8

 

54         The historical background to this Psalm is to be found in 1Sam 26

 

55:22    ‘cast thy burden (mgn that he hath given thee) upon the Lord’ indicates that David realised that his flight from Absalom was ‘of God’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

55:7 Maybe in saying ‘then would I wander far off and stay in the wilderness’ David is commenting on his feelings when he fled from Absalom. 2Sam 17:16


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

55:22 The phrase ‘casting ... sustain thee’ is quoted by Peter – 1Pet 5:7 – when encouraging the brethren as to how to deal with persecution.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

Raping a man's wife and then murdering him to cover up is a gross sin by anyone's standards. This is what David did, and as a direct result he obtained the hatred of Ahithophel, the woman's close family relation and David's chief advisor. Psa 55:21 describes this man's inner feelings: "war was in his heart".

One might think that it was right for Ahithophel to hate david. He had seen a great sin committed and he wanted justice to be done. He viewed David as a transgressor. Yet in the next verse (v22) David describes himself as righteous, and in v23 how God would protect him from his enemy.

The big lesson here is that God forgives; and when He forgives it is total. David was now a righteous man again. God had removed his sin so that it didn't exist any more. Ahithophel, however, still remembered, and therefore he faced the wrath of God. We need to be careful when retaining memories of another's sins. How are we to know if God has already taken that sin away? If we judge another person in our hearts, we can set ourselves up in direct opposition to God, who will go to any lengths to vindicate His righteous (forgiven) servants. This is why Jesus commanded "judge not, that you be not judged" (Luke 6:36-37).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Rob

53:8 The Psalmist saw that the only way in which the ‘wicked’ would end their activities would be when Zion had brought forth salvation – clearly a reference to the work of God through Christ in the kingdom.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Psalm53 mirrors Psalm 14. It certainly reflects today’s God is Dead attitude.

Psalm 55 recounts the time of the Ziphites betrayal of David (1Sam 23:19-29).

Psalm 55: David complains about the ill treatment he received at the hand of his smooth-talking acquaintances. But, he instructs the reader how to deal with problems (v.22 see 1Pet 5:6,7).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
Psa 53:1-3;Rom 3:10-12.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

55:17 David’s prayer three times a day is like Daniel – Dan 6:10. Is this an indication that it was common for faithful men to pray at three specific times in the day?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Romans  7 and 8
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Romans 7 online in the King James Version Listen to Romans 8 online in the King James Version
Listen to Romans 7 online in the New International Version Listen to Romans 8 online in the New International Version

 

7v.1-6 - The analogy of marriage as we know it is used so often to demonstrate the commitment we should have to Christ. v. 3 is true only of human life and that is the reason it is put here - by contrast our marriage to Christ is not one that will be broken by death. In this marriage 'until death do us part' is for ever. Let us all therefore try to 'serve in newness of Spirit', knowing that we no longer 'bring forth fruit unto death'.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
EVEN PAUL STRUGGLED

Sometimes we can find it a real struggle to walk the Christian life with all the temptations and pressures life throws at us. Sometimes it can even get depressing when we tally up our day or our week and realize how often we have failed to do what we should have don, or have done the things that we shouldn't have done.

While there is no excuse for sinning and we must still confess our sins to God and ask for forgiveness, we can be encouraged by the fact that even Paul, who we look up to as being one of the greatest men of God, struggled with exactly the same sins as we do. He said that the good that he wanted to do he did not do and the things that he did not want to do, he did! We all have exactly the same problems whether we are as great as Paul or whether we consider ourselves the lowest of the low.. Yet Paul, at the end of his life, despite his struggles, was 100% confident that his Lord was prepared to give him a crown of everlasting life.

Despite our struggles too, we can have the same confidence as Paul and know for sure that we will be given the kingdom. It is not an excuse for sin, but a faith and confidence in the grace and mercy of our God and his Son, Jesus Christ.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
Romans 7:24 - "O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" - This account of the pervasiveness of sin is finished more impressively by the groans of the wounded captive. Having long maintained a useless conflict against innumerable hosts and irresistible might, he is at last wounded and taken prisoner; and to render his state more miserable, is not only encompassed by the slaughtered, but chained to a dead body; for there seems to be here an allusion to an ancient custom of certain tyrants, who bound a dead body to a living man, and obliged him to carry it about, till the contagion from the putrid mass took away his life!

Romans 8:1 - "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit" - Baptised and walking with our Lord day by day, there is nothing that can conspire against us to keep us separated from Him. Our past sins are far removed, and our present shortcomings are covered in the blood of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world to take away our sins, so frail as we are and weak as we may feel, there is no condemnation levelled by God against those who are in Christ Jesus.

_____________________________________________________________________

THE GOLDEN THREAD - As Psalm 53 told us, only the fool would say there is no God. Pharaoh, thinking that he was God found out this truth to his eternal chagrin in Exds, and Paul teaches us to rejoice in the fact that there is a God, therefore nothing can pluck us out of His hand - Romans 8:28-39


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
8:29 'Predestinated', <4309 'pro+orizw'>, 'to determine beforehand'. As buses have destination blinds which state the intended end of the journey, God has stated fo us his intended end of our life's journey. In the case of the bus there is no guarantee that it will complete its journey. Leaving the route or mechanical failure can cause a vehicle to fail to reach its destination, but nonetheless the pre (beforehand) destination was a clear statement as to its intended end.

Here, God states beforehand his intended 'end of the road' for us! The predestined end is set for His angels to see on our foreheads, it reads, 'This individual is intended to be conformed to the image of my Son'. Israel's High Priest too, wore on his forehead God's intended destination of the nation, 'Holiness to the Lord', although successive generations (with notable individual exceptions) have failed to complete the journey.

What a privilege we have to be so foreordained by God, we only have to steadfastly complete our course. The questions of v31-37 lead us to realise that God is on our side and so finally (v38-39), we are brought to the glorious realisation of God's love.


Derek Palmer [Tenby (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Derek

7:11 In saying that he was ‘deceived’ Paul is quoting Gen 3:15 to show the origin and all pervading influence of sin.

8:9 The ‘spirit of Christ’ is not some mystical inner experience for the believer. It is a tangible manifestation and acceptance of the work of Christ as a pattern for our lives. If we do not manifest his life we are none of his.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Rom 7:4  Christ was born under the law, and redeemed from the law, that we might be redeemed by the sharing of his redemption.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
7:7 - Here we see a distinction which it does us good to contemplate.  The law, we see is not sin, but a means whereby we might choose to sin.  The same applies of anything that provides us with this choice.  Let us be sure to recognise that the blame, and the consequent need for forgiveness, is with us, the sinner, and not whatever (or whoever) we might wish to blame that we feel led us in that direction.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

 

8:23 We, like Paul cannot feel complacent about our walk in Christ.  It is a struggle - the flesh is always contending with the spirit.  If we are not constantly cognizant of our failings then we should take stock (1Cor 10:12). 

If we are not yearning to be free then we must be satisfied with this passing life. When times are tough, let us remember the words of the psalmist: Be of good courage, and he shall strengthen your heart, all ye that hope in the LORD. (Psa 31:24)


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
GOD WORKS FOR GOOD
 
"And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose." (Rom 8:28)
 
This verse provides a stumbling block to many who believe that God is not interested in the mundane events of our lives and that life is made up of a series of chance happenings where God is not involved at all - except, of course, where he may chose to intervene at a particular moment for a particular purpose. 
 
Paul's confidence in his God was far more than as the watcher of chance and circumstance.  He said, "We know."  This was not a matter of what he thought, an opinion or belief - it was a matter of being totally sure of the fact. 
 
"We know that in all things."  Again Paul could have phrased this in many other ways - the occasional things, some things, certain things, but no, he said, "ALL things."  Are there any exceptions to "all things"?  No, of course not.  Good, bad, mundane, exciting, stressful - God works in them all.
 
"We know that in all things God works..."  Yes, it is his hand at work in our lives, whatever comes along.
 
"For the good"  God is always interested in us, and as our Father he works for our best.  Everything that happens to us may not be rosy, but we, like Paul, can know it will be for our good.
 
"Of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose."  Here is the defining factor.  It is up to us.  If we have been called and we show God our love, we can know that in all things God works for our good.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Robert
Taking 7:8 and comparing it with 6:7,18 we see that we must recognise that we are no longer bound by law.  By our covenant which God has entered into with us we are no longer sinners but righteous.  How else will we attain our promised inheritance?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

7:10      That the law of Moses was ‘ordained to life’ is an exposition of Lev 18:5 – that man that kept the law would live, unfortunately men cannot live by that law. The shortcoming is in man, not in God.

 

8:2       If we are ‘free from the law of sin and death’ then death cannot rule us. However we regularly forget what God has done for us in Christ and  despair of our situation. Rom 8:1-3 should get us back on the correct course again.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
There are many uses of “Spirit” in today’s 2 chapters. Although I know there are a few Brothers and Sisters who will disagree with this, but most of our published commentaries, and many of us regard this use of Spirit as the godly side of us, compared with the fleshly, or carnal, side. The word “spirit” should have a small “s”.  It is not the Holy Spirit at all. So when Paul concludes the chapter in Rom 7:25 saying that his mind serves God, but his flesh serves sin, he says exactly the same in Rom 8:1, where he calls the flesh, flesh, but the “mind” he calls “spirit”. Rom 8:6 summarises the argument: if we are fleshly minded, we die, or perish (as in John 3:16), but if we think of things of God then we have eternal life, and peace.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

7:22-23 We may well be troubled by the fact that we know that we sin even though we do not want to. We should, in a sense, be encouraged by this awareness. If we do not experience these feelings then we do not appreciate how we can be delivered from our sinful nature.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
7:7 How often have you heard said "we have nothing to do with the law" or "the law is not for us" This is not what Paul is saying here, he would not have known sin, if it had not been for the law. For him the law was of value, but it cannot save. It can and does reveal our sinfulness, and brings and points to our Savior, as Paul wrote to the Galatians "the law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ," Because it taught obedience, it led to maturity.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

8:2    Being ‘free from the law of sin and death’ does not mean that we do not sin. However  it is the status of the one who is justified by fait as his faith is counted to him for righteousness – that we are counted righteous by God despite our nature.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

7:1 The use of the word ‘dominion’ catches the flavour of Rom 6:9,14. On those occasions Paul was talking about sin having dominion over us. Freed from that in Christ Paul now turns to the Jew who would rest in the law and uses the same word to highlight the point that those who want to observe the law are slaves to that – like they were slaves to sin. He is offering freedom from that in Christ.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

8:29 Yahweh knows all things, the end from the beginning (Isa 46:10). Therefore, He knows His elect in advance (1Pet 1:2). However, He did not predestinate those to be saved in the sense that they could not fail. It is difficult for our finite minds to understand the infinite (Isa 55:9). Foreknowledge is a statement about Yahweh’s complete understanding of things beyond time. Predestination (foreordination) refers to His purpose concerning the foreknown elect (2Tim 1:9).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

References to Eden:

7:7-11 is a commentary on what happened in Eden by the tree. The commandment not to eat the fruit. The deceit of the serpent.

8:20-22 specifically mentions all the curses (except the curse on the serpent - but see below!)

Rom 8:35, 38-39 refer to the separation of mankind from Eden by God, effected by the angels/cherubim in the first instance, and ultimately by death. Notice it even mentions the sword and nakedness - two further separating factors (Gen 3:10, 24)

and finally the quote in 8:36 refers to Psa 44 where in v15 we read of shame and a covering, in v21 God searching out their secrets, v24 hiding, and v25 the curse on the serpent: to cling to the ground and wallow in the dust.

If you can find any more references to Eden, please post them here or email me!


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

SAVED

I. things required for salvation: hope Rom 8:24-25; belief or faith John 3:16; obedience Heb 5:9; baptism after belief in the Gospel Mark 16:15-16; the blood of Christ (or sacrifice of Jesus) 1John 1:7; the grace of God Eph 2:8-9; keeping in memory what has been preached 1Cor 15:1-2 

(note how all the above are interrelated and dependent on each other).

II. three types of being saved:

     A. past tense - saved when the believer avails himself of Christ's sacrifice at his baptism 2Tim 1:9;Titus 3:4-7.

     B. present tense - saved as a continuous process throughout life Acts 2:47 (RSV,NIV); 1Cor 1:18 (RSV,NIV);1Cor 15:2;2Cor 2:15-16 (RSV,NIV); Phil 2:12-13.

     C. future tense - saved in the ultimate future sense Matt 10:22;Matt 24:13;1Cor 3:11-15;Rom 13:11;1Cor 5:5;1Tim 4:16.

III. is eternal security (i.e. once saved always saved ) Scriptural? Not if by believing this it is thought impossible for him/her to fall away Heb 3:12-14 (notice the condition "if"), 4-6; 6:4-6;10:26-31;1John 1:6.

IV. the process of being saved Acts 22:10,16;Phil 3:10-13;1Cor 9:27;Titus 3:7;Rom 8:24;2Pet 1:4-11;Col 1:22-23; Jude 1:20-21 (KJV).


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

7:6 Having highlighted that the brethren should not be slaves to the law Paul deals with the possible response that the law must have been bad then given it is superseded in Christ. By quoting Exo 20:17Paul highlights the benefit of the law – it taught him what sin was.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter