|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3
v. 5
- Here is the first time that we are shown the stuff that Moses is made of - he
has no confidence in human terms - borne out by the rest of the chapter - and
yet here was one who was to get closer to God than anyone before him (see note
on Rom. 9 below), who was possibly only exceeded in this closeness by Jesus himself
after him. His atoning work for the people by his repeated trips to the mountain
demonstrates this closeness, to save the people Exo.19:12,21.
Even Aaron could not - Lev.10:3.
The exhortation for us in the context of Exo.
3:5 comes in Eccles.
5:1. This surely means
'develop the mind of Jesus'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4
v.4 - Further bravery here from Moses. Would you pick up a snake by its tail?
In this I admit to absolute cowardice and substantial fear. I'd like to think
I would do it if God told me to do it - but it would take a massive amount of
faith. Where I live, there are no snakes, so I have no experience, but some of
you who read this will live in parts of the world where there are snakes. My guess
is that you will feel even more strongly than I do that this act of Moses was
one of extreme faith in God's protective power, and it is glanced over in the
record as if picking up a snake by its tail was something Moses did every day! Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:17
I will bring you out Genesis 15:14 3:17 affliction Genesis 15:13 So in proclaiming the Yahweh name to Moses, who clearly was knowledgeable about what had been said to the fathers, God is showing Moses that deliverance from Egypt was but a manifestation of the work of God. The full manifestation, as we know, was in Jesus who bore the Father's name. 4:24-26 seems to be completely irrelevant to the theme of deliverance being developed in Exodus. However the issue of circumcision and Genesis 17 is intimately connected with the theme. We will now see additional links to Genesis 17 and the covenant of circumcision. :26
circumcision Genesis 17:11 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There are a number of verbal links between Moses at the burning bush and Gideon.
4:22 This is the first time that Israel are presented as God's 'firstborn' as such this language and the idea that Israel is God's son passes into Biblical use. So whenever we read of Israel as God's son we should think of the deliverance from Egypt. A typical use which makes this point very clearly is Hosea 11:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exodus
3:1 - "The backside" - i. e. "to the west of the
district." Among the Hebrews the East is before a man, the west behind him,
the south and north on the right and left hand.
Exodus 3:2 - "out of the midst of a bush" - The wild acacia or thorn, with which that desert abounds, and which is generally dry and brittle, so much so, that at certain seasons, a spark might kindle a district far and wide into a blaze. A fire, therefore, being in the midst of such a desert bush was a "great sight." It is generally supposed to be a symbol of the Israelites' condition in Egypt - oppressed by a grinding servitude and a bloody persecution, and yet, in spite of the cruel policy that was bent on annihilating them, they continued as numerous and thriving as ever. The reason was "God was in the midst of them." The symbol seems also to represent the present state of the Jews, as well as of the Ecclesia generally in the world. Or perhaps the thorny, prickly bush represents Moses himself, despised and rejected of men, but one through whom God was going to speak, yet Moses would not be consumed.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Lord answers
Moses' question this way: "I am who I am". French it translates: "I am the one
who is". Both languages use the present tense of the infinite of the verb 'to
be'. Hebew translates: "I will be who I will be". Hebrew language uses the future
tense of the infinite of verb 'to be'. The infinite of verb 'to be' is: Yahveh,
the Jews say it without the vowels 'a' and 'e': YHVH (prounced short and sharp).
There is no present tense in this verb, only past and future, and it is meant
to stress the Lord is limitless. Usually, when 'thou' is used in the AV Bible, the Hebrew version will translate it as 'Yahweh'. Modern versions translate 'thou' as 'you', so we miss this valuable lesson. 'Thou' is an old English word, and during that time, 'thou' was used only when talking to a member of the family, because it implied 'dear' or 'darling'. Some languages like: German, French, Holland etc. Still keep this personal form of address to use within their families. They also have a polite form of address, for use with non-family members, eg: German personal 'du', polite 'zie'; French personal 'tu', polite 'vous'. If you check a German Bible for example, you will see the Lord uses the subject pronoun 'du', when He talks to Israel; sometimes God is angry with Israel, yet He will still uses the pronoun 'du', the implication is, no matter what the Israelites did, God still considered them a part of His family. It is helpful to keep in mind, that we are God's children, and blessed to be so, even though sometimes, we let our feelings get the better of us. Beryl Butler [London West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Beryl |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ch.3 -
The memorial name of God appears to be a parallelism even though it doesn't come
across terribly well in the English AV - the Hebrew definitely suggests the following
rendering: 'This is my name for ever, This is my memorial for ever' which can obviously
be paraphrased as: I just thought it was interesting since this added emphasis on 'for ever' implies what I believe, that God's name will always be the same and will never change. Ibrahim David [Cardiff East (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Ibrahim |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3:8 That God had ‘come down to deliver’ marks a powerful contrast with Him going down to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. (Gen 18:21) 4:1 Moses could be forgiven for thinking that Israel would not believe him because they did not believe that he was the deliverer when he slew the Egyptian 40 years earlier – see Acts 7:25 when he had called upon them to turn from their idol worship (Eze 20:7) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exo 3:12 God promised Moses that he would worship God in Israel’s company on this Mountain Exo 4:1-9 God’s 3 signs for Moses to help prove that God had sent him:- a) Rod turning into a snake, and back again. Could this symbolise the Tree of Life and the biting power (serpent) of sin? These 3 magnificent signs are therefore the whole hope of God’s New Testament which God revealed to Moses for the benefit of Israel as in v1 David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exo 3:7 Once again we see God's power and His love displayed in three single syllable words. Seen, Heard, Know. God had seen all their afflictions, He had heard all their pleas and prayers for deliverance from the bondage of Pharaoh, and was fully aware of all their suffering. What wonderful words of comfort and exhortation for all of us. God delivered the children of Israel out of Egypt under the leadership of Moses. Likewise with each one of us, our Heavenly Father is aware of all our difficulties, He hears all our prayers, and is fully aware of all our hardships. As He delivered Israel, we also know that we will be delivered, by His Grace, if we serve him to the best of our ability. We have that assurance from His promises which we know can not be broken. Even so come Lord Jesus. Rev 22:20 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Gods of the Near East had names and distinct characteristics. The God of the Hebrews, by command, was YHVH ( 3:15). These four consonants are known by the Greek term tetragrammaton which means four letters.Jews historically had been reluctant to utter the holy name of YHVH and so they substituted the name adonai which means my lord. Later on they combined YHVH with the vowels of the word adonai to produce the name Jehovah which is used by some groups today. Religious Jews, today, write God as G-d which, they believe, gives reverence. YHVH implies a forward-looking aspect of the deity. The Name is really bound up with God-manifestation and given light in Christ ( Matt 1:23) and, by extension, in us (1Cor 15:28, Rev 22:3,4).Today, God as a generic term is used by all and sundry who claim to believe in him/her. We strive to make a distinction between the Truth and worldly religion. A case, then, could be made to call our God YHVH (Yahweh) which would show our understanding and future hope? At least, if LORD is used, it should be done being fully persuaded as to its significance. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4:24-26 Whatever exactly happened here, we see a weakness in Moses, both spiritually and physically. For whatever reason he had failed to circumcise his son, and the implication is that this why in v.24 the Lord sought to kill him. Moses, it seems, is bailed out in his cowardice by the courage of his wife, and suffers her obvious contempt as a result. Note that no further punishment seems to have been meted out on Moses for this error, but that now he is sent forth to do the set task that God has for him. It should be a source of great comfort to us that God chooses and works with people who are flawed, just like us, and forgives them and moves on. Oh that we could learn to do the same with each other. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moses showed a lack of confidence when Yahweh called him to go back to Egypt. He had run away from there with a price for murder on his head and was scared of retribution. Yahweh assured him that those seeking his head were all dead. Then he doubted whether he could deliver Yahweh's message effectively in Egypt. Yahweh allowed Aaron to accompany him as spokesman. Little by little, Moses confidence grew as he asserted his leadership role. Hopefully, as we grow in Christ, our confidence will also grow. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3:1-6; 23:20-21; 33:11,20; 34:1,2,5,6; Acts 7:30,31,32,33,35,38,53; Gal 3:19; 1Tim 6:16 - Here we have examples of God manifestation where an angel is acting as a representative of God and bearing the name of God. 4:2-9 - Here we have three signs that are perhaps echos of Christ and his 3 day victory over sin.We have a staff (ie, wood, crucifixion?) that overcomes a snake (the initiator of sin). We have the restoration of sinful flesh to clean. And finally we have water (burial of sin via baptism?) turning into blood (sacrifice of Christ's blood atoning for sin?) which perhaps echos the beginning and end of Christ's three year ministry. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3:10 ‘bring forth my people’ is another element of the way in which God is showing Moses that he is to be involved in the fulfilment of the promise to Abraham – Gen 14:10.
4:10 Moses’ claim that ‘I am not eloquent’ actually qualified him well for the job. God was not interested in using Moses’ words. He was to speak God’s words. We might reflect on whose words we think we speak when we talk about the gospel. Do we think that we are inadequate to speak about Him? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3:12 it is interesting that the sign he is given will actually only take place afterwards - after he has brought the people out. 4:2,6 God often uses something that one has/possesses. 4:22-26 the firstborn son of God, of Pharaoh, & of Moses tied together in this incident. 4:14 despite Moses' unwillingness, God already knew what he would need, and had already sent Aaron, who arrived before Moses had left for Egypt 4:27 Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EXCUSES "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey all I have commanded you." (Matt 28:19-20) Many have called these words of Jesus the Great Commission. This was his last instruction to his followers, and as Christians, something we should take very seriously. Mark puts it a little more simply, saying, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation." (Mark 16:15) My guess is that many of us, myself included, try to use the same excuses to get out of preaching the word as Moses used to get out of going back to Egypt. Moses had two excuses and one plea. 1 - "What if they do not believe me or listen to me and say, 'The LORD did not appear to you?'" (Exo 4:1) Moses was scared of rejection. Rejection is a fear that we all must face up to. Not everyone will believe our message, but like Moses, we have been given signs - fulfilled prophecy is an undisputable one - that proves that our message is true. 2 - Moses said, "O LORD, I have never been eloquent, neither in the past nor since you have spoken to your servant. I am slow of speech and tongue." (v.10) Another of our fears is physically having to speak to people. But God's answer to Moses also applies to us. God made our mouths and tongues and we must use them to glorify him. 3 - Then Moses said, "O Lord, please send someone else to do it." (v.13) At that God's anger burned against Moses. Let's overcome our fears and preach the word lest God's anger burn against us also. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3:9 The cry of people can come up to God in one of two different ways. On this occasion God heard their cry ad sought t deliver them. In Gen 10:20-21the cry of the people brought God’s judgment upon Sodom and Gomorrah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:2-4 The manifestations which God made were always accompanied by unmistakable signs that it was the LORD. Look at the evidence given to Moses on this occasion. He saw fire, but no one to ignite it; he heard a voice, but no human lips from which it came; he saw no living Being, but one was in the bush, who knew him, and called him by name. It had to be the God of Israel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exo 3:13-15 God's name is an affirmation of His existence & presence, not a meaningless title. As He is outside time, the relevance of possible present, past & future tenses is only for us. So we are reassured that whenever we are present in time, He is present & active. He affirms that He was working with the Patriarchs, is working with the current generation, & will continue to work to bring about the fulfilment of what He had promised to them.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2007 reply to Wendy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4:30-31 Whilst the people initially believed God’s word through Moses and Aaron when things did not go smoothly they stopped believing that God was going to work to deliver them. How often are we willing to believe His word when things are going well only to start to doubt when things are not going smoothly? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3:12 In an earlier entry I set out a number of links between this chapter and the life of Gideon. The links are not just an academic exercise. Rather they help us to see that Gideon had a role model – that role model was Moses. Who do we imitate? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3:1 Horeb means dried up which is indicative of the arid desert region in which it is found. The region possesses a rugged mountain range approximately two miles long and one mile wide. Some believe that Horeb is this mountain range, and that Mount Sinai is a peak in that range. Others think that it is the other way around, Horeb being the peak in the range called Sinai. Scripture does not clarify this as it uses the two names interchangeably: Horeb: Exo 17:6; 33:6; Psa 106:19 etc. Sinai: Exo 19:11,18,20,23; 24:16; 31:18 etc. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4:21 Yahweh does not deliberately implant evil in an individual. Doing so would be inconsistent with the free will that Yahweh has given humankind. What Yahweh does is to strengthen the path that an individual chooses to take, either for good or for evil (Rom 9:18). In the case of Pharaoh, he chose to take an evil path in opposing Yahweh. Yahweh strengthened Pharaoh’s decision by hardening his heart. The word harden in Hebrew is chazak which means strengthen. The overall purpose of Pharaoh’s opposition to Yahweh was to be an object lesson for Israel (and by extension to all nations) to understand the power and exclusivity of their unique God (Rom 9:17).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3:8This is the first time that the promised land is described as flowing with milk and honey For it to flow with milk meant that there would be lush pastureland for cattle (sheep and goats provided most of the milk and milk products at this time). For it to flow with honey there would be an abundance of wild flowers (honey eaten at this time was wild honey). Later we'll see other evidence of the land's fertility when the spies brought back grapes, pomegranates, and figs (Num 13:23,24 ).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exo 3:6;Matt 22:28-32;Mark 12:23-27;Luke 20:34-38. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exo 3:5,7,8,10;Acts 7:33-34. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exo 3:18;Exo 5:3 - 3 days connected with sacrifice perhaps foreshadows/echos Christ's sacrificial offering and deliverance from sin and death. Exo 4:10-15;Exo 6:12 - Moses grew powerful in speech Acts 7:22. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3:16 When Moses was told that he was to go to pharaoh ‘that thou mayest bring forth my people’ Moses was being reminded of the promise that God had made to Abraham – Genesis 15:16 highlighting another link with the promises in Gen 15– I have highlighted others in previous years. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56
v. 3,4
- It seems amazing that in the multitude of adversaries David had that he could
state his faith so clearly, and it is not only here. Ps.34:4,
1Sam.30:6. What would we do? Well, one way to clarify our minds is to turn
to 2Cor.1:9,10
and then be comforted by the fact revealed in 1Cor.10:13,
which of course is borne out by many events in David's life. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57v.3
- The word truth is predominantly in the Psalms and the writings of John. Where,
as here, we read of mercy and truth together we have a vivid picture of the Salvation
to be wrought by Jesus. In Psa.85:10-11
we see the significance. Mercy represents God but truth (John
14:6) represents Jesus who sprang out of the earth, in his birth, as we do,
growing with out nature that he might overcome sin in the flesh. If you substitute
the concept of salvation through Jesus for the word truth wherever you read it,
it gives beneficial insight into the meaning of the passage. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56:1
This Psalm probably relates to the same time as Psalm
34. In that Psalm David shows that fear of God is to be preferred above fear
of the Philistines. In this Psalm David recognises that his deliverance is through
the mercy of God.
Psalm 57 - This Psalm relates to the time recorded in 1 Samuel 22. So as well as instructing his 400 men as we saw from Psalm 34 he still sees that he has need which only God can meet :1 'be merciful ':1, 10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56:6 Those who 'mark' David's steps are not the Philistines - rather David is speaking about Saul and those who are seeking his life. The reason why he fled to Achish in Gath. 57:3 The one who would 'swallow me up' is Saul. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Psalm
56 - "To the chief Musician upon Jonath-elem-rechokim"
- properly belongs as the subscription to Psalm 55. The superscription to this
Psalm begins "Michtam of David, when the Philistines took him in Gath"
- 1
Samuel 21:10-15.
Psalm 57 - The superscription to this Psalm begins "Altaschith, Michtam of David, when he fled from Saul in the cave" - Al-taschith means "do not destroy." Psalm 57:1 - "shadow of thy wings" - It is obvious that Almighty God does not have wings or feathers, though both these aspects are used from time to time throughout scripture to describe Gods providential care for His children, as a mother hen or even as an eagle. The wings here refer to the wings of the Mercy seat, where, though the ordinary Israelite could not see it, his heart dwelt in faith, knowing that the Mercy Seat, and all that it signified to the mind of faith, was his only hope of life eternal Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56:4 So we learn where David’s confidence was. He learnt, as Psalm 34 shows, that he could not work out his problem and had to reply on his God. It took David time to get to the position where he trusted God rather than seeking his own solution – the going down to Gath was his solution. We do well to realise that we have to rely on God and cannot rely on our own wisdom and planning. 57:4 David’s description of Saul and his men, who sought his life, in terms of wild beasts matches the way that God views the Godless nations – see Daniel 7 for example. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The two Psalms that we read today once again go together as is so often the case. Psalm 56 This Psalm was written when David first went to Gash. 1Sam 21:10 Psalm 57 Written when David is in fear of his life in the presence of the servents of Achish. 1Sam 21:11 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56:8 David's Heavenly Father is mindful of his exile and remembers his tears. The custom of "bottling the tears " of mourners as a memorial, which existed in some Eastern nations, may explain the figure. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56:11 - We do well to stop and meditate on this verse. All of us will have had times - rarely as extreme as the experiences of David, but nevertheless times we can relate to - when men and women have made attempts to do unacceptable things to us. Let us remember, as David clearly did here, that no man can ever take away our eternal inheritance - even if they take our life. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Both of today's Psalms start with the same words, (Psa 56:1 and Psa 57:1). Merciful means gracious, that is giving me a lot more than I deserve. Psalm 56 is David asking God for protection from his enemies, but the next Psalm (Psa 57:1-4) is stressing how God is a refuge from trouble. If we accept what the title says, then David wrote this when he was hiding from Saul in the cave. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56:13 David’s continuing confidence that God will deliver him is based on his experience of his God – ‘thou hast delivered me’ 57 Title. ‘Altaschith’ means ‘destroy not’. David, on more than one occasion, had the opportunity to kill Saul but would not destroy him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56:11 If we would only at all times be like David and put our trust in God as he did, we would then be able to truly say that we had no fear or were not afraid of what man could do unto us. God will be with each one of us, if we allow Him to do so. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These psalms are messianic, and give us an idea of the thinking of Jesus & of his communication with his Father when he was beset by his enemies. He never gives in to despair, but rejoices in the care of God. This is a wonderful example for us. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
56:3 This Psalm was written by David as a consequence of the events of 1Sam 21:10. So we see, like we do in Psalm 34, how David dealt with the trauma of that event. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Psa 57:1 David says he will take refuge under the wings of God until the disaster has passed. In the context of the cave, we have the refs 1Sam 22:1, 24:3 Although David had taken refuge in a cave, Saul inadvertantly came very close to him, but did not discover him. When we, in our lives, take shelter in God, the "disaster" may still come uncomfortably close, but we have to maintain our trust in God that he will be with us & keep us safe.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2007 reply to Wendy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57:4Isn’t it interesting that whilst David had saved sheep from a lion – 1Sam 17:36 - he did not react with violence towards his persecutors. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referring to the title of the Psalm, it seems unbelievable that David would flee from Saul into the hands of the Philistines. But such was his fear of the 7ft giant (Saul) that he failed to take into account the giants dwelling in Gath. We read in 2Sam 21:22 that at least four giants had been born to Goliath. We should not underestimate the threat that these men posed to David, who had, after all, killed their father. This threat rose above the threat of Saul when David heard them quote the song which had been sung after his victory over Goliath (1Sam 18:6-7, 21:11). He realised that, whilst the king had no animosity toward him, those sons certainly did. We read at the end of David's life that these giants had dogged him until the end, so much so that at the death of the last one, he penned the song recorded in 2Sam 22 "on the day when the LORD had delivered him from the hand of all his enemies" (2Sam 21:22 - 22:1). In 22:49 he writes "You also lift me up above those who rise against me". And so the end of his struggle with men who towered over him. When we take Ps56 in the context of that song we can derive an account of what may have happened in Gath. See 2Sam 22:17-19 and Psa 56:5-6 to see how they conspired to turn Achish against him, and finally confronted him openly as we have seen in 1Sam 21:11. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Rob |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
UNDER THE WINGS OF GOD As David fled for his life from the envious king Saul, Saul got closer and closer. Finally in desperation David and his men hid in the back of a cave. Their hope was was that Saul would pass by and not notice them. But imagine the stress levels inside that cave as Saul, instead of passing by in a frantic pursuit of David, decided to use the cave as a rest room. Inside there was no escape for David and his men. A cave has only one entrance and Saul with his heavily armed guards filled it. Was this the end of the road? Was there to be no escape? We are not likely to be trapped in the back of a cave, but we do have similar experiences from time to time of being trapped, in danger and completely out of control. It may be in an employment situation, in relationships, finantially, or like David, with people that are out do do us in. In that desperate situation, knowing there was nothing he could do to get out of it, David called out to God. "Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy on me, for in you my soul takes refuge. I will take refuge in the shadow of your wings until the disaster has passed." (Psa 57:1) David's plea was for God to shelter him until the trouble had passed. Like a baby bird sheltering under the mother bird's wings, David felt safe. Let us also go to God for our shelter from the desperate circumstances we find ourselves in. We can be truly comforted under the wings of God. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56:13 - We have on this occasion [my "soul" (KJV) or "me" (NIV)] being delivered from death indicating the nearness and potential for death. The word used here is the Hebrew "nephesh" (5315) which means a breathing creature man or animal and it's variously rendered person, creature, self, life, soul. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Charles |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
55:13 the man who was David’s ‘guide’ was Ahithophel. 2Sam 15:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57:1 The phrase shadow of thy wings denotes Yahweh’s protection and mercy (Psa 36:7). The image of the mercy seat overshadowed by the enfolding wings of the cherubim is an image that also comes to mind. The word, wings in Hebrew is kanaph which means extremity or edge, particularly of a garment, and thus a hem. Israelites had to wear blue on the borders (kanaph) of their garments (Num 15:38). This color represents heaven, the throne of Yahweh, from whence emanates all commandment and power. Thus, the heavenly power to heal is embodied in the blue border of the garment.Malachi also makes reference to this when he talks of Christ: But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings ( kanaph); and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall (Mal 4:2).Touching the hem of Christ's garment was sufficient for healing ( v.36). The example of the woman diseased with an issue of blood also comes readily to mind (Matt 9:20-22).May we always remain in the shadow of His wings, and obtain the ultimate healing at the judgment (1Cor 15:53,54). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The title for Psalm 57 says "when David fled from Saul into the cave" and the margin refers to the occasion of 1Sam 22:1 but this doesn't fit the Psalm. At this time David wasn't in danger from his own men. It does however fit with 1Sam 24 where his men urged him to kill Saul. v7 tells us he had to restrain them, and v4 and 10 that they applied pressure to him to do it. This appears from the Psalm to have been a make or break moment for David, whose men were "set on fire" and "their tongues a sharp sword" (v4). They saw the answer to all their problems in murdering Saul, God's anointed. These men and their violent nature would have brought David down had God not delivered him by providing a peaceful way out, because Saul realised he had fallen into his own trap (v2-3, 6). 1Sam26 also fits, especially as David's restraining words to Abishai are "do not destroy" which is in the Psalm's title (1Sam 26:7-11). So is this Psalm an amalgamation of these incidents?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57:1 There is an added dimension to David's use of the figure of sheltering in the shadow of God's wings. In 1Sam 24:4 we read how David cut off the skirt of Saul's robe to use later as a sign to Saul that it had been in David's power to kill him. In 1Sam 24:5 it seems that David regretted doing so - perhaps because he realised how close he had come to taking matters into his own hands and not relying on God by sheltering under His wings. The word translated here as skirt is the same hebrew word that is translated wings in the Psalm.
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2010 reply to Ken |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.14-16
- Refers to the time when Moses came close to God (Ex.33,34 esp. 33:19,
34:6,7). It is important that we realise the 'goodness and severity of God'.
Rom.11:22
as demonstrated so clearly in these events. Isa.27:11,
Mic.7:18. This all hinges round our calling. Compare v.16
of Rom.9 with John 1:12,13 and Eph.2:4-10. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.25-29
The quotations from the Old Testament - use your marginal references - highlight
that the call of the gentiles was part of God's plan even before Jesus' birth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| :32
So we see again that the pre requisite is 'faith' - So we are back considering
the 'father of the faithful - Abraham who Paul considered in Romans
4. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Romans
9 - "How then does Jewish nationalism fit into the plan of God?"
could well be the overall title of this chapter.
Romans 9:21 - "Hath not the potter power over the clay; of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another to dishonour" - The objection is founded on ignorance or misapprehension of the relation between God and we, His sinful creatures here on earth. Men generally suppose that He is under obligation to extend His grace to all, whereas He is under obligation to none. All are sinners, and have forfeited every claim to His mercy; it is therefore perfectly just for God to spare one and not another, to make one vessel to honor and another to dishonor. So for a time Israel received the blessings of God, and now Paul says, the turn of the Gentiles has come. Make the most of it, be thankful for it, and do not boast in your own strength or achievements - but remember Israel and be mindful that as He cast them off for willful disobedience, so He can also cast us away. The Jews have not been cast off forever as we know, but their treatment from God must remain a salutary lesson for all of us. __________________________________________________________ The Golden Thread - David reminded us in Psalm 57 that we find refuge under the overshadowing wings of the Mercy Seat in the Ark of the Tabernacle [as it were]. Israel as a nation, and Moses as an individual in Exodus, were safe under God's overshadowing wings, even though Pharaoh was bent on destroying them all. Though Israel has been "cast off" by God "until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled," the nation of Israel still benefits today from God's overshadowing care and providence, just as we as God's children also do, as Paul shows in Romans Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.29
- The phrase 'Lord of sabaoth', we are more used to as 'LORD of hosts' (cp. 1Sa
1:11, 17:25). 'Sabaoth here is simply a Greek transliteration (4519)
of the Heb. word for 'hosts' (06635) carried
through untranslated from the LXX (Septuagint) version commonly used by New Testament
writers. God is, Lord of the hosts of heaven (the sun, moon, and stars), of the
angels (the multitude of the heavenly host, that do His pleasure, fight under
Him, and for Him Ps
103), and of the hosts of nations all of whom are under His government. Derek Palmer [Tenby (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Derek |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9:2 Paul’s ‘great heaviness’ for Israel contrasted starkly with their self satisfaction that was manifest, for example in them saying ‘we be Abraham’s seed …’ (John 8:33) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rom 9:10 Salvation is a matter of Grace. Paul shows this clearly in this verse, After dealing with the case of Issac and Ishmael, Paul turns to the example of Jacob and Esau. They not only had the same father, but also the same mother. They were conceived at the same moment. Both Jacob and Esau were born in answer to prayer.(Gen 25:21) Never the less in spite of their similarities, before they were born Rebecca was told. "The elder shall serve the younger" Gen 25:23 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| :12 - Here we have a principle that we see repeated throughout scripture so much - God chooses whom He will. He does not go for the ones we would expect. Let us therefore spread our net of preaching wider and wider that we might enclose those fish that He has called. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vs.15-21 run counter to the Pollyanna attitude that some have about God. Those who quote God is love (1John 4:8) etc. as proof of an all-accepting God, misunderstand. The God of the Bible is not obliged to any man. Therefore, in the unfolding drama of God's plan, we must count ourselves extremely fortunate that He has called us to salvation. In God's drama, we are in leading roles while the rest of the world is supporting cast. We should also count our brethren, who share the same hope, as precious (1Pet 2:3,4). To all others we preach, not knowing to whom God will extend His grace. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.31,32 - Here we see where Israel failed. Their failure was not due to their determination to do wrong under the law, but because they sought God's grace by the law, instead of by faith. Let us make sure that we do not make the same very human mistake of thinking that we will be rewarded according to what we do. Our reward is based on why we did it. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9:3 Paul’s wish that he ‘were accursed …’ is rather like the way in which Moses asked that God might blot hi out of the book of life rather than destroy Israel – Exo 32:32 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| May I please point out a very easy error? In Rom 9:12,13 there are 2 quotations from the Old Testament. It is so easy to run these two verses together, and think that Paul is saying that before Esau and Jacob were born, God said that the elder should serve the younger, for God loved Jacob and hated Esau. That is quite wrong. Yes, the first of these references comes before the twins the born (Gen 25:23), but the second one about loving and hating is from Mal 1:2,3, which comes right at the end of the Old Testament. This quotation is not a prophecy, it’s a commentary on what happened. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9:22-24 "...endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction." God in His wisdom provided a way to overcome sin, by having his face shine (I think of this as smiling on) the "vessels of mercy." His wisdom decreed that this grace would be given only after suffering, part of which would be by "the vessels of wrath" who are a necessary, though abhorrent, part of the environment on the path to salvation. These objects of God's destruction are one of the ways whereby we come to realise that we need to be saved! God be praised, not because He will save all, but for the wisdom of His plan to have mercy on a remnant, bringing them to glory though so undeserving. I'm sure we all feel this, and wonder at it. We see in this chapter that we cannot hope to earn salvation by anything we do (especially by Law), but, throwing ourselves into God's hands, serve Him out of love for all He has done and continues to do for us each day. Michael Bull [New Westminster, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9:14 Here we have another rhetorical question – just in case some would argue that God was not fair in the way He had dealt with Israel. Paul then demonstrates, by quoting Exo 33:19, that God is fair. We must, therefore, develop an understanding of God which takes account of what we learn in Exodus 33. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rom 9:2,3 "I have great sorrow & unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were cursed & cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers.." Is this the way we think about those of our brothers & sisters who have gone astray & followed the wrong path, one which has taken them away from God? Do we join Moses & Paul in fervent prayer, as well as actual effort to bring them back? Does it impact us unceasingly, as it did Paul?
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2007 reply to Wendy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9:4 There were benefits in being born a Jew. The Jew had the advantage of familiarity with Scripture. How valuable do we see our knowledge of Scripture? Do we take it for granted or treasure it? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:6 Having emphasised the benefit of being a Jew in verses :4-5Paul reminds those Jews that being Jewish is of itself not the important thing. It is a matter of being of the seed of Isaac – verse:7 (and by implication not the seed of Ishmael. These two lines of the seed of Abraham mark the mind of the spirit – Isaac and the mind of the flesh – Ishmael. So there was a lot more to it all than simply being the seed of Abraham. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.5 Trinitarians like to point to this verse as proof that Jesus is God. We must remember that there is no punctuation in Greek, and so different versions will have different punctuation. Look at the KJV: …the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. And the ESV: …is the Christ who is God over all, blessed forever. The KJV leaves room to separate Jesus from God, but the ESV does not. However, the RSV clearly separates Jesus from His Father: To them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh is the Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen. But, no version poses any problem if we understand God-manifestation. It is clear that the Bible teaches Yahweh is over Christ (1Cor 11:3). Jesus, Himself, states that he cannot act without the power of the Father (John 5:19,30). Jesus has been given all power, but when His role is completed, He (and His immortalized brethren) will yield to Yahweh and He will be manifested in all (1Cor 15:24-28). In the Old Testament, those acting in the Name of God were called God (called by His Name). For example, the angels who appeared to Abraham were called Yahweh (Gen 18:1,2). And so, it should not be surprising that Jesus, who acted in the Name of His Father, should not be called God. In fact, with that very understanding, Thomas called Him God (John 20:26-28). And so, if we understand the nature and role of Jesus; His relationship with His Father; the principle of God-manifestation, then we will not be confused with erroneous doctrines such as that of the Trinity. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a hard chapter. And however much we don't like it, the conclusion of the matter is: "how can the clay say to the potter 'why have you made me like this? ' " (v20-21) So if God is our creator, it is important that we all individually ask for His mercy (v15-16, 18, 23) because to whoever asks, it will be given (Matt 7:7, John 4:10, Rom 8:32). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:15 We should be so thankful that God is not ‘unrighteous’ shouldn’t we who are not Jews. God’s mercy is shown at His discretion, and we are the beneficiaries. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||