October 1

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 1Chronicles  15
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 1Chronicles 15 online in the King James Version
Listen to 1Chronicles 15 online in the New International Version

 

v.1,2 - Although David recognised that the law required that the Levites actually carry the ark, as laid down in the law, he himself performed the office of a priest in preparing a place for it. He was able to do this as a priest of the Melchizedek order, as demonstrated by his actions in tomorrow's chapter. See note on Gen.14, (Jan 7). This is the order of 'kings and priests' to which we can belong if we overcome by God's grace. 1Pet.2:9, Rev.1:6, 5:10
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
15:29 The last time that we saw Michal at a window she was lowering David down to escape the wrath of her father 1 Samuel  19:12 On that occasion she risked her life for her husband. On this occasion she 'despised him in her heart' 1 Chronicles 16:29 David had grown spiritually whilst he was away from her. She had degenerated spiritually.
So the wilderness was a better growing environment that the court of the king.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.2,13 - We see here an interesting series of lessons. First that we must do things the way that God has decreed, and second that we must accept this even if we feel it is not necessary. David was angered by the breach which God brought upon Uzzah for touching the ark when it was not his place to do so, but this chapter shows how the man after God's own heart puts aside his own emotions on the matter and accepts that God's law must not be challenged. This is a very great lesson that we should all learn to counter the arrogance of thinking that we know better than God.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:1-24 David prepares to bring the ark from the house of Obed Edom to Jerusalem
::4-11 David assembled the priests for the task
:12-16 David speaks to the Levites about bringing the ark to Zion
:17-24 The singers appointed.
:25-28 David brought the ark to Zion
:29 Michael, David's wife, Saul's daughter, despised David

Having been established as king in Jerusalem David makes preparations in readiness for bringing the ark to Zion and then brings is up amidst much singing. Michael's Saul's daughter, shows her true colours. She despised David because he humbled himself.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Notice the emphasis on David's preparation :1, :3, :12 'prepared'. This cannot be a casual repetition - clearly the Spirit wishes us to see that David's actions were not a spur of the moment activity.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
TRY AGAIN

David could have given up. A man had died. David's success and rejoicing had turned into failure and mourning. He had done it his way, and it had not worked. Many people in David's position would have thrown in the towel at this stage and given the whole thing up as a bad idea, but instead of doing that, David learnt from his mistakes and failures, and tried again. This time he did it God's way.

In the time between his first and second attempts to bring the ark back to Jerusalem, David must have done some diligent research into what went wrong the first time, and how he could get it right the next time. David persevered, tried again, did it God's way, and, amid the rejoicing and praise to the LORD, the ark was carried into Jerusalem and placed in the tent that David had pitched for it.

We too will often fail in the things that we do. Even when we know that it is the right thing to do, we may fail because we haven't had the experience or we have gone about it the wrong way. But when it is the right thing to do, let's not give up if things do not go to plan, but evaluate what we have done. Then we need to make sure that we set to the task in the right way - God's way.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Robert
15:29 Here we see Michal, David and a window. The last time we sw these three items together was 1Sam 19:12. On that occasion Michal lowered David out of the window because she loved him. Now she 'despised him in her heart'. David had developed spiritually since that last occasion. Michal had degenerated into a Godless unspiritual woman. She had stayed at home with her father, David had been a fugitive in the wilderness. Where do you think is the best place to be? With a Godless king in luxury or with David in the wilderness?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
The renewed effort to bring the ark to Jerusalem was highly organized. To begin with. David exhorted the priests to sanctify themselves for their high duty. He warned them what neglect could mean.(V.12-15) The three errors made before must not be repeated: The carrying of the ark on a cart.(Num 7:9) Not covering it with a cloth of blue.(Num 4:6) Uzzah's handling it. All must be done "as Moses commanded according to the word of the Lord" Exo 25:14
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
It was a tremendous time for rejoicing.  For the first time in Israel's history here was the ark of God coming to Jerusalem.  No temple yet, but the next best thing, a tent.  Jerusalem was, and is, to be the city
of the Great King.  David did well to rejoice with all his might.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

Vs.16,17,19 David introduced a system of musical worship through appointed musical masters.  They were required to perform their worship every day (1Chron 16:37).  One of their duties was to sound the cymbals.  

Asaph, one of the musical masters, became prominent and several Psalms (50; 73-83) are attributable to him in some way.  One of his descendants was among the first to return from exile (1Chron 9:15).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

15:13  It might seem harsh of david to tell the priests that ‘ye did it not at the first’ on the first attempt to bring the ark to Zion. We might have thought that David bore at least some of the responsibility. An important principle is seen here. Whilst David was the king of Israel it was the responsibility of the priests to ‘keep knowledge’ Mal 2:7  even to the degree to teaching the king of the land. In like manner there should be no distinction in the way that we instruct each other, whether ‘mighty’ or ‘humble’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

Vs.18,21 It seems that Obed-Edom, who housed the ark had two jobs (1Chron 13:13).  He was a gatekeeper, and a harpist (16:5).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

15:5-11  There were 862 priests involved in bringing the ark to Zion – but the ark could easily be carried by four men! So we see the magnitude of the rejoicing at the bringing of the ark to Zion


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

Vs.13-15 Three months previous, the ark had been transported in an incorrect way. This resulted in the death of Uzza. Now, the ark was transported in the right, way according to the Law. 

Actually, it was the job of the Kohathite branch of the Levites who were responsible for transporting the ark (Num 4:15).

There is a lesson for us here.  It is best to understand what Yahweh requires before attempting to do something. If there is uncertainty over the matter, He can be consulted through prayer and His Word.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

15:28 Notice that whilst it was in David’s heart to bring the ark to Zion the record says it was ‘all Israel’ who brought it marking the point that at this time the people wanted to do the thing which was in David’s heart – indicating that they were faithful to God at this time.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

15:25  Again we see that David wanted to share the bringing of the Ark to Zion with the whole nation.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.29 Michal’s behavior was first commented upon in 2 Sam 6, and has been reproduced here with amendments.

Michal saw, in her mind, the king behaving in an undignified way. The king had disrobed from his royal vesture and was gyrating about in the sight of his subjects. His movements would have been slow, in keeping with the solemn music which would have been played for this occasion.

By dancing, David was praising Yahweh, from the heart, for His blessing of kingship.  But, Michal was more interested in monarchical ritual than in praising the one who granted the post.  It was a case of flesh versus the spirit between Michal and David.  Michal’s royal snobbery cost her motherhood, as Yahweh was not pleased with her attitude.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

15:27 In wearing a ‘linen ephod’ David is seen to be performing the work of the priest.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Ezekiel 27
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Ezekiel 27 online in the King James Version
Listen to Ezekiel 27 online in the New International Version

 

v.13 - Javan, Tubal and Meshech were 3 of the 7 sons of Japheth (Gen.10:2, 1Chron.1:5). Javan is also mentioned in Isa.66:19, and Meshech and Tubal feature in Eze.32:26, 38:2,3, 39:1. The reference is to Russian quarter rulers and people.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
27:13 the persons of men Revelation 18:13
27:30 cast dust upon their heads Revelation 18:19
27:5 Senir is Mount Hermon Deuteronomy 3:9 'Which Hermon the Sidonians call Sirion; and the Amorites call it Shenir;'
27:13 is quoted in:- Revelation 18:13, when speaking of Babylon, as indeed is verse 30. The Babylon of Revelation is made up of Old Testament language from the fall of Tyre, the fall of Babylon and the overthrow of Jerusalem by the Babylonians.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.12-14 - Further to the comment above, Tarshish (v.12) and Togarmah (v.14) were also of the Japheth line, which suggests that this list is carefully organised.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Tyre had been a great support in the building of Solomon's temple. Indeed Hiram was 'ever a lover of David' (1 Kings 5:1). What had gone wrong? Tyre had become self centred and concerned with her own wealth. In this position she forgot the 'brotherly covenant (Amos 1:9) and turned against Israel.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
27:8-25 The list of places here and their association with Tyre indicates the power and influence of this sea port. It also give us an insight into the world of trade in the days of the Babylonians.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
27 Tyre seems to come in for a more detailed criticism and condemnation than any other of the nations round Israel that Ezekiel speaks against. Maybe this is because Tyre had known more about the God of Israel. In the days of David and Solomon there had been a close alliance between the two countries and it is difficult to believe that those kings did not teach the Tyrians about Yahweh.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
The fall of Tyre holds a great lesson for each one of us. These ships of Tarshish, the mighty works of of men, are symbols of fleshly pride and power which was so evident in Tyre. We must always be putting things of the flesh aside, remembering that the kingdom of God will be established and at that time all fleshly pride will be removed from the earth. The Psalmist points  out how easily it will be done away with. Psa 48:7  
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.12  Tarshish was thought to be Tartessus, a Phoenician city in southern Spain.  We are told that Tarshish produced silver, iron, tin, and lead which was sold to Tyre. 

Historians tell us that Britain produced these metals and sold them to Mediterranean places.  They claim that the regions of Cornwall and Dartmoor were the first to produce tin.  The fame of this region, as a tin producer, spread so that Britain became known as the Tin Isles

The Phoenician merchant vessels were generally known as the Ships of Tarshish.  Thus, any reference to Tarshish, as a place, does not necessarily allude to Spain.  And so, the possible identity of Britain as Tarshish should be noted when considering Ezekiel's prophecy in Chapter 38.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
Way back 500 years before Christ Tyre was a very sophisticated trading nation.  It’s interesting to read the comments in today’s chapter about the extent of Tyre’s trading partners and merchants (Eze 27:1-25). But despite their greatness, and world renown, still the Lord God of Israel was going to bring them down to the ground. He, and He alone, rules the world.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

27:3 Tyre had a long association with Israel beginning with the association between david and Hiram. As such, being influenced by the morals and standards of Israel she should have been more humble than she was. Of course Israel and Judah hardly gave her a good example to imitate. What about our lives? Do we set a good example of a Christ like life for those around us to see?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

Vs.5,6 Large trees were to be found only in northern regions, at elevation.  Three trees from three regions are mentioned here

First are the pines from Senir.  Senir refers to Mount Hermon that rises to a height of 2,814m (9,230ft.).  It is located on the border of Syria and Lebanon (see Deut 3:9).  

Then, cedars of Lebanon are also mentioned.  These huge trees grew at elevations between 1000m - 2000m (3300ft - 6600ft).  They could grow to 40m in height and have huge girths.  The few giant cedars that are left have been estimated to be 2500 years old.  

Finally, oaks of Bashan are cited.  Bashan was a northern frontier area in the tribal allocation of East Manasseh.  Oak was particularly prized for ship construction.   


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

27:26 The ‘East wind’ seems an appropriate description of the force that destroyed the maritime city of Tyre. It was later fulfilled by the invasion of the Greeks, coming from the East.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

V.2 Tyre was the world's trading hub at this time. It was known for its wealth, power and beauty. By serving the world it served itself. However, two universal positions existed: Serve God; or serve self. Tyre chose to serve self and not God. Who needs God when one is doing well? Thus, Yahweh destroyed Tyre for its pride. Paul says: For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction (Rom 15:4) (ESV). The same choice exists today for humankind - serve God and live; or serve self and die.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

27:5-8 In this section Tyre’s navy is described, in particular the making of their ships. Notice how multinational her ship yards were.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

27:5 Tyre is close by Mount Hermon. However here the mountain range is described as Senir’ which is the Ammonite name for the mountain – Deut 3:9– maybe marking the international nature of Tyre’s trading.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

The place names in this chapter (according to the KJV) are briefly addressed:

V.5 Senir is an appellation for Mt. Hermon.

V.6 Chittim is Cyprus.

V.7 The isles of Elishah refer to Greece.

V.8 Arvad was an island city off the Syrian coast.

V.9 Gebal was a Phoenician city situated just north of Beirut.

V.10 Lud (called Lydia by the Assyrians) was to be found between Assyria and Syria. Phut was located near Egypt.

V.11 Gammadims simply means men of daring (valor).

V.12 Tarshish is identified with a Phoenician city in Spain.  However, because the ships of Tarshish were trading vessels, they visited many places.  A place, such as Britain, became associated with the name Tarshish because of the amount of raw materials that were sent to Tyre from Britain.

V.13 Javan is associated with the Greeks; Tubal is associated with the area of the southern Caucasus Mts, east of the Black Sea; Meshech is associated with the area between the Black and Caspian Seas.

V.14 Togarmah is associated with the Armenian region.

V.20 Dedan is associated with N.W. Arabia.

V.21 Kedar is also associated with the N.W. of Arabia.

V.22 Sheba is associated with Yemen.

V.23 Haran was located just north of the Euphrates in Mesopotamia; the locations of Calneh and Eden are unknown, but are placed in Mesopotamia; Asshur is another name for Assyria; Chilmad was a city beyond the Euphrates.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

Have you noticed the links between this chapter and Revelation 18? Here's a list of some, but there's probably many more. Why do you think Revelation is picking up this prophecy of Tyre?

ch27
Ezekiel
ch18
Revelation
12
Your many luxury goods
18:3
Abundance of luxury
12-24
(List of merchants who profitted)
18:3
Merchants of the earth become rich
3-4
"I am perfect in beauty"
18:7
Glorified self. Lived luxuriously
33
enriched the kings of the earth with luxury goods
18:3,9
Kings of the earth commit fornication and lived luxuriously with her
30-32, 35
Isles astonished. Kings greatly afraid. Wailing + lamentation. Cry bitterly. Weep with bitterness. Dust on heads
18:9-19
Kings weep + lament. Weep + mourn, Dust on heads

And the nature of its fall is the same too: Eze 27:26,27,32,34 "the midst of the sea" and Rev 18:21 "threw it into the sea saying 'thus with violence the great city Babylon shall be thrown down'"


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

27:29 The impact of the falloff Tyre would be more widespread than just the inhabitants of Tyre. All the trading nations whose ships used Tyre as a trading centre would suffer also – hence all the categories of people that would lament over the demise of Tyre as the great trading nation.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Luke  24
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Luke 24 online in the King James Version
Listen to Luke 24 online in the New International Version

 

v.13 - The story of these two on the road to Emmaus is full of surprise and circumstances that certainly do not suggest fabrication. This is important as it the most comprehensively accounted and personal of the records of the witness to the resurrected Jesus.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
24:23 Isn't it interesting that they had no difficulty believing that the women had seen angels, it was the message that they had problems with.
We would do well to think on this. We 'entertain angels' if we are willing but do we always see them as such? An angel in our lives is someone sent by God to stimulate us in beneficial ways.
24:50 This did not follow on immediately from the incident in the room because he went to Galilee where he had arranged to meet his disciples. John 21 has some of the details of that visit to Galilee and also we know that he was on earth after his resurrection 40 days before the ascension but from Luke's account of the gospel there does not seem to be forty days from the resurrection.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
24:31 The opening of the eyes of the two who had walked with Jesus echoes Adam and Eve's experience (Genesis 3:7) when they had taken of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. By contrast, the two on the road to Emmaus were associated with the tree of life - Jesus whereas Adam and Eve were barred from it.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:34 We know Peter was not there in the upper room - else the two would not have needed to tell the assembled company that Jesus had appeared to Peter. But how did these two know that Jesus had appeared to Peter. They left Jerusalem only knowing the claims of the women.

We must conclude that Jesus had told them.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
v.45 Christ taught them 6 things in v 46-47 - Christ showed them ‘what’ to preach. But He also taught them ‘how’ to preach, this verse gives us a clue on the consistency of the Apostles methods of preaching Christ. Note how the Acts speeches and Epistles use the same OT references to prove the same message. What a Bible School that would have been...!
Jared Schipper [Perth Ascot (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Jared
24:45 We should be careful not to presume that Jesus 'opened their understanding' by some miraculous means. Their understanding, like the two on the road to Emmaus, was opened by a realisation that what they already knew Scripture said applied to Jesus. It was their attitude to Scripture which developed. In this there is a lesson for us. So often we come to Scripture with a closed mind - unwilling to let it teach us what it is saying. We might echo the words of the Psalmists 'Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of thy law.' Psa 119:18
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.30-31 How was it that the two suddenly recognized him? Did they see the marks of the nails in his hands? Was it the manner in which he broke the bread and gave it to them that opened their eyes? Or, was it the way he spoke to his Father that refreshed their memories? Of course we do not know; but there was doubt it was the risen Lord.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.21 The followers of Jesus had the expectation that He would redeem Israel at that time.  When He died, that dream ended and they were overcome with disappointment.

Vs.27,44 The Lord confirms that the Gospel begins in the Old Testament and does not begin in the New Testament as some suppose.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

V32 "he opened to us the scriptures" Everything in the Old Testament points forward to Christ, and in the New Testament everything proceeds from Him. How richly blessed each one us are in having the Word explained to us.. 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

24:33  This meeting is the same event as when Jesus met the disciples and Thomas was not present – John 20:19


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
As we read this account of Cleopas and his friend's encounter with Christ on the road to Emmaus, we ask ourselves: How often does Christ walk with us unrecognized; when our hearts and minds are wrapped up in our earthly cares and concerns? How often do we think that we are alone? When in fact we are never alone? We are told on more than one occasion I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

24:11‘Idle tales’ really denigrated the testimony of the women – there were more than one of them who were able to tell the apostles, and yet they did not believe. So the ones who would be ‘sent’ – the meaning of apostle – did not believe the message they would later tell. So we see there was a tremendous change abut to take place in these men.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
As we look further at this account of these two followers of Jesus, we see so much of their makeup. This would have been the spring of the year, and yet it appears that they were unaware of anything that they would have been surrounded with; the only thing that they were concerned about was the death and the crucifixion of Jesus. Their minds were totally tied up with the thoughts of the events of the past few days. They were completely unaware of the beauty of the season; the rebirth of the fields, and of the trees, the birds in song. If only our minds could be focused on the Hope of Israel to the same decree.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

24:11  That they viewed the words as ‘idle tales’ indicated that whilst they would have liked the words to be true it never entered their consciousness that they were, in fact, true.

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.18 Cleopas and his companion did not recognize Jesus until He was revealed to them.  Do we recognize Jesus in our brothers and sisters?  If we do, then our treatment of them will be exactly how we would treat the Lord (Matt 18:5). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

24:13 And now we have moved towards the end of the resurrection day and are now outside Jerusalem. Luke makes little references to the details of the resurrection morning, confining himself to the meeting with the women and a brief comment about the women talking to the eleven.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.41,42 Jesus did not have need of food. An immortal being does not need to eat. But, Jesus wanted to put his disciples, who were still trying to process everything, at ease.

V.37 The word spirit comes from the Gr. pneuma and has been used to describe unseen conditions such as:

-divine entity (Matt 3:16)

-mental illness (Luke 8:29)

-physical infirmity (Luke 13:11)

-mental desire (Matt 26:41)

-mind, mental disposition, inner self (Mark 8:12)

-life force (John 6:63)

-attitude (1Cor 4:21)

But, when Jesus appeared to the disciples, they thought that they had seen a spirit (pneuma). This is not proof that ghosts, poltergeists or other popular superhuman apparitions exist. This is a reference to angels who, although they can appear in human form, are nevertheless spirits (Heb 1:13,14).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

24:21 In saying that they had thought Jesus would ‘redeem Israel’ they are voicing a thought that was seen at the time of Jesus – Luke 1:68 It is as if the whole of the gospel narrative is enveloped in this thought – that Jesus would redeem Israel. The people were looking for deliverance from Rome. God was providing deliverance from sin and death.

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter