October 13

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 2Chronicles  1 and 2
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 2Chronicles 1 online in the King James Version Listen to 2Chronicles 2 online in the King James Version
Listen to 2Chronicles 1 online in the New International Version Listen to 2Chronicles 2 online in the New International Version

 

1 v.6 - We are told that Solomon (though not alone) offered 1000 burnt offerings before the Lord. One wonders how many days this would have taken. We are told quite specifically of the (one) altar that they went up to use, so it clearly there was a long spell of constant sacrificing here. God saw this as being good as the outcome is that he visits Solomon in a vision and makes him this offer of 'whatever he wants'. I wonder whether we would even contemplate sacrificing so much of our time and energy and money to God as Solomon must have done here.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

1:3-4 The mention that Solomon went to Gibeon whilst the ark was at Zion catches the situation that David instituted. 1 Chronicles 16:1,37-39
There were two systems of worship in place in the days of David when he brought the ark to Zion. The Aaronic, with the Levites and the Melchisedec, with Asaph and his brethren.
Solomon chose to follow the Aaronic by going to Gibeon.

2:1 The juxtaposition of the waywardness of Solomon in the previous chapter with the abrupt change of tenor to tell us that Solomon desired to build an house for the Lord catches a dichotomy in Solomon.
There was the desire to be faithful contrasted with his waywardness.
He desired wisdom for the correct reasons but then violated the laws relating to the king thus fulfilling Samuel's words but then desires to build the house that David had worked to prepare the material for.
Whilst the Chronicles record continues here with the work of building the temple, Solomon's double mindedness is seen again. 2 Chronicles 8:11 When he took many strange wives.
The kings account continues with Solomon's waywardness without reference to the building of the temple. 1 Kings 11:1 Thus marking the wayward side of Solomon.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
2:2 - The scale of this exercise was staggering for us mere mortals! I suppose if anyone reading this is a director of a large company, this may be less amazing to them, but to me it is unbelievable. We should make the same major effort to build the house of the Lord today.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

1:12 & 1:16 Provide us with an interesting juxtaposition. Solomon was given 'wisdom' but took horses from Egypt in direct contravention of the command (Deuteronomy 17:16) and so we are shown an aspect of Solomon's character. He oscillated between serving God and violating His laws. This is so much like us.

2:6 Solomon's recognition of the majesty of God and that he could not be contained in a house shows an understanding which was not matched in the days of Isaiah (66:1) by which time the temple had become some sort of talisman - Israel thought that because God's temple was in Israel they would never be over run by an enemy.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
A KINGDOM PICTURE
When God gave the promises to David concerning the son who would rule after him and the type of rule he would have, they had a two-fold fulfillment. The first was with Solomon and the second and complete fulfillment will be when Christ returns.
In Solomon's reign we have a glimpse of what the reign of Christ will be like - although the power and glory of Solomon will be nothing compare to the power and glory of Jesus Christ when he returns. So what we read here are only shadows of what the reign of Christ will be like.
Jesus was the greater son of Solomon. Though we hardly hear of the wisdom of Jesus - he was more wise than Solomon. His reign will have more peace than Solomon's. Solomon made silver and gold as common in Jerusalem as stones, and he made Cedars and plentiful as the Sycamore fig trees in the foothills. We read in Revelation of the New Jerusalem, that the city was made of pure gold and in Isaiah, that the fruitful field will become like a forest.
But the most exciting part of the reign of Christ is that we can be part of it and enjoy it. We can only look back on Solomon's reign, but we can look forward to the return of Christ.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert

1:7 'Ask what I shall give thee' is the basis for Matthew 7:7

2:11 Huram's use of The LORD indicates a degree of understanding of the God of Israel - probably as a consequence of David's instruction.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
LOVE AND REWARDS

When I asked for a volunteer from among my children to do a job for me, only one of them came running up to me, saying, "I'll do it dad!" I was touched by his eagerness and enthusiasm to help. Perhaps the contrast from the lack of response from the others made his eagerness seem even more outstanding. As a result, I decided to reward him for his good deed. When my other son saw the reward, he also wanted to help - but the opportunity had passed. The reward was for the willing volunteers - not for those who do something just for what they can get out of it.

Solomon was also rewarded in this way. In his love for the LORD, Solomon enquired of him in Gibeon, offering 1000 burnt offerings on the altar there. Little did Solomon know that there was to be a reward for his devotion. Solomon's act was done out of love. But God saw what he had done and offered Solomon anything he wanted.

What we need to notice is the process. Firstly Solomon showed his love and devotion to the LORD. Then God gave him a reward. Let's not show love to our God because of the rewards he might give us, but be genuine, loving him for what he has done regardless of whether there are rewards to follow or not.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Robert

1:10 In speaking of going out and coming in Solomon is using the language of a shepherd. Num 27:17 shows Moses, in his old age, seeking a replacement lest the people be like sheep without  a shepherd.

2:18 So we se that the kingdom of God, under Solomon's rulership had 153,600 gentiles in it. We see further, that they worked in the kingdom even to the extent that 3,600 were overseers. Gentile involvement in the kingdom has always been part of God's plan.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
1:14 Even though the law clearly stated that a king should not multiply horses(Deut 17:16). Solomom still had a passion for horses that was greater than that of any Israelitish monarch, before or after him. His stud comprised of fourteen hundred chariots and twelve thousand horses. Even though he bought and sold for profit, it was still a prohibited indulgence for a king.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
Solomon started his reign in a very Godly manner.  He already had the ark in Jerusalem, in the tent David had made for it, but he still went the five or so miles north of Jerusalem to Gibeon, where the rest of the Tabernacle was, to worship God there. 
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

1:3 Yahweh hated high places because there the pagan nations performed their idolatrous sacrifices. Thus, when the Israelites entered the Land, they were told to destroy the high places (Num 33:52).

Israel was to worship Yahweh at Shiloh (Josh 18:1). The ark was taken from Shiloh when the Philistines defeated Israel and never went back (1Sam 4:1-5). It was then that Gibeon became the major center of worship prior to the temple (1Chron 21:29).

Gibeon, meaning hill place, was a natural high place as it rose some 2400 ft.  Gibeon was considered an acceptable place for worship which continued until the temple was operative (1Chron 16:39,40).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
2:1 The duty of building the temple was reserved for Solomon; as soon as he became king, he addressed himself to the work, and the writer, in proceeding to give an account of the building, begins with relating the preliminary arrangements.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

 

2:11,16 Jerusalem and Tyre are both blessed at this time with peace and wealth.  Contrast their situation to that which we have been reading about recently in Ezekiel. 

Jerusalem was doomed for destruction and her people taken captive.  That finality occurred in 586 BC.  The prophecy of Tyre's destruction was realized about 250 years later by the hand of Alexander the Great. 

As great and spectacular as Solomon's kingdom was, it did not last.  But it did foreshadow the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus which will be greater in magnificence and scope, and will never be destroyed (Dan 2:44; Luke 1:32,33).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

1:13  Gibeon to Jerusalem is about 5 miles – 8 kilometres. Hardly a long way even in Solomon’s days, hardly what we would call a ‘journey’. The word ‘journey’ is used, not because of the distance, but because of the purposefulness of Solomon. He had gone to Gibeon to stand before the tabernacle even though the ark was in Jerusalem.

2:3 We learnt that David’s house was ‘of cedar’ –2Sam 7:2  – but David made no mention of the involvement of Hiram in the work. Solomon’s comment fills in some details about David’s home that we do not learn in the historical event of that time.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
2:7 It is interesting to note that Solomon only asked for one who was capable od directing workers from all areas. Not unlike Bezalall (Exo 34:31). The workers who David had gathered together for this work (1Chron 14:1) were still in Jerusalem, and would have instructed others in the various trades, such as masonary and carpentry.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

1:9 Solomon’s prayer that the promises to David might be ‘established’ echoes 1Chron 17:23 where David prayed that the promises might be ‘established’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

1:16 ere is an indication that Solomon was moving away from the sort of kingdom that David maintained. There is no record of David having had any horses at all.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

1:14-17 Solomon had received wisdom and knowledge from Yahweh (1:12).  And yet, he contravened the Law by multiplying horses (Deut 17:16). There was no prohibition on Kings' owning horses, but they were not allowed to create a cavalry like the nations around.  Yahweh would fight for Israel, and having a cavalry showed lack of faith in the arm of the Almighty (Psa 140:7; 147:10; Prov 21:31). 

2:3,11 Huram (Hiram) the King of Tyre was a Phoenician, not to be confused with the worker of the same name who was a half-Jew (2:13).  The worker's mother is listed here as being of the tribe of Dan (2:14).  However, she is listed as being of the tribe of Naphtali in 1Kin 7:13,14.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

2:12 In talking of the God of Israel as the God ‘that made heaven and earth’ we see an indication of Hiram’s understanding about the God of Israel – probably an indication of the instruction that he had received from David.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

1:3,4 Although the ark was now installed in Jerusalem, sacrifice could not be made there. The altar of sacrifice, which was made by command of Moses in the wilderness, was still at Gibeah (1Kin 3:4). Now, Zadok, as high priest, would offer these sacrifices (1Chron 16:39,40).

1:5 Bezaleel was an inspired artisan under the command of Moses (Exo 31:2-5).

1:10 Solomon asked for wisdom and knowledge, which Yahweh granted (1:12). And yet, these qualities did not prevent Solomon from sinning according to the Law.

Moses had expressly forbidden kings of Israel from amassing horses, and from returning to Egypt (Deut 17:16). And yet, that is exactly what Solomon did (1:14,16,17).

Obedience to Yahweh has nothing to do with how much wisdom we possess. It has to do with making our will His.

2:2 These men were conscripted by Solomon as laborers. They were the children of the foreign nations still found in the Land.  Men of Israel were not conscripted as laborers (1Kin 9:21,22).

However, the people of Israel were taxed to pay for the expenses of the work (1Kin 9:15).

It was the burden of taxation that drove Israel to complain to Rehoboam, Solomon’s son (1Kin 12:4).

It is easy to be impressed by Solomon’s wisdom and wealth, and the grand projects in which he was involved. His visitors, like the Queen of Sheba, were wowed (1Kin 10:8). But, let us not forget the unhappiness of Israel as they were forced to pay for the temple and Solomon's house.

Of course, the people’s anger was instrumental in thrusting Jeroboam to power, and the split in the kingdom.

2:16 See 1Kin 5:9.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

1:14  After the wonderful description of the way in which Solomon sought wisdom we see that wisdom did not prevent him making unwise decisions about how to organise his own life.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

2Chron 2:7 - archaeology has shown evidence of Israel's backwardness during this time period regarding the engraving arts.

2Chron 2:15-16 - is it possible we have a foreshadowing echo of Christ's anointing sacrifice which along with wood floating through the sea perhaps reminds us of Noah's ark, the baby Moses in the basket, and Christ's burial/baptism for both Jew and Gentile?


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Ezekiel 39
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Ezekiel 39 online in the King James Version
Listen to Ezekiel 39 online in the New International Version

 

v.7 - The idea of Israel no longer polluting the name of the Lord must surely refer to the time of the kingdom, where spiritual Israel will dwell in peace and righteousness. The idea of the pollution being no longer is also set out in ch. 20:9,14,39
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

39:17 speak to every feathered fowl Revelation 19:17
39:17 assemble yourselves together Revelation 19:17
39:18 ye shall ... of princes Revelation 19:18

The destruction of God here passes into Biblical use as a pattern. We should not confuse the events described in Ezekiel 39 with those in Revelation 19. Just as the numerous references to Babylon in Revelation do not refer to actual Babylon but what it is typical of so it is with Gog in Revelation. It draws on the patterns of things revealed in Ezekiel.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.29 - regardless of everything, Israel are forgiven. We should be greatly encouraged by the disposition which the Father has to save us. Let us lean on Him in all things.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
39:23 We should realise that the destruction of Gog is designed to show the world why Israel have been taken into captivity. It was not to be a time of gloating by Israel.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
39:23, 29 Notice the contrast. Whereas God his face from Israel He would do this no more when the kingdom is established. So all Israel will be saved' (Romans 11:26)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
39:8 "It is done" is quoted in Rev 16:17. Here we have Ezekiel's final judgement spoken of which is echoed in the battle of Armageddon. The evil of man if finished because God has intervened to save His people. 
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

V.6 In addition to the destruction of Gog's armies upon the mountains os Israel, we are now told that "the fire of (God's) wrath" Eze 38:19 will extend beyond the confines of the Middle East battleground and will penetrate the home territories of Gog and its allies.  


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.1 etc. We should watch the signs appearing in the political heavens but we should also watch how we are walking so that we are ready to receive our Lord when he appears.  His caution in Mark 13:32-37 should give us pause for thought.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

Eze 39:11
Hamon-gog, or "Multitude of Gog" will be quite a sight and a huge reminder to those travelling to the Temple in the Kingdom age. We are told the location of the "valley of the passengers" is east of the sea (that is, the Dead Sea). So the lesson is that, while the passengers are travelling to Jerusalem for worship, they walk up and around the right side of the dead sea until they reach this City of Death(ie. Hamoanah). Coming now around the North side of the Dead Sea, and then crossing the Jordan, they would then walk the Valley of Hope(Hos 2:15, Isa 65:10).
So there is a reminder of the Wages of Sin=Death as they pass Hamon-Gog, and also again when approaching the Valley of Achor. Achor was named such after Achan took goods from the seige of the Amorites(at Jericho). Achor, meaning troubling, becomes a door of hope for those who are joined to the Bride. The travellors to the Temple will see the great blessings poured out on Israel as they see their herds lying down there as well. Every step without and within the Millenial Temple will have lessons and reminders for all travelling to it. 


Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Matt
GOD'S COMPASSION
 
When we think back to some of the earlier chapters in Ezekiel, and remember the way in which the people of Judah, with their idol worship, rejection of God and immoral behavior, tested God's patience to the limit, we could wonder how he could ever bring himself to say what we now read in Ezekiel 39.  "Therefore this is what the Sovereign LORD says: I will now bring Jacob back from captivity and will have compassion on all the people of Israel, and I will be zealous for my holy name.  They will forget their shame and all the unfaithfulness they showed towards me when they lived in safety in their land with no-one to make them afraid." (Eze 39:25-26)
 
Reading of God's compassion on such a disobedient, unfaithful people, gives us an awesome hope for ourselves.  Even though we are sinners, he is willing to forgive and forget all that we have done in the past.  He will have compassion on us and love us.  God wants us to be part of his family. 
 
Few of us have disappointed him as much as Israel did, but even if we did, God's compassion can overlook those offences against him. When we are forgiven he will forget our sins and we will never have to bear the shame and guilt of them again.
 
Let's be thankful that our God is so compassionate.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Robert
The world is to learn great lessons from Israel. Eze 39:23 says that the heathen will know that Israel’s captivity was because of their sin. They sinned and were punished, but now, (in Christ’s Kingdom), the Jews have returned. Never again are they to be separated from God (Eze 39:29).  What a wonderful way for the prophet to conclude this part of his forth-telling!
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

39:9-10  The description of what will happen to the weapons of war when Gog is destroyed does not match what happens at the moment and has happened in the past. An army would loot the slain and recover what weaponry was useful from the defeated army. Israel will have no need to weaponry at this time.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

39:9 The burning of the weapons of war fits in with Isaiah’s description of the kingdom when nations ‘will not learn war any more’ – Isa 2:4


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

39:28-29 The spiritual regeneration of Israel will be seen after the destruction of the northern invader. It is that event which will finally cause them to realise that they cannot rely upon their own strength.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

Vs.4,6 When Gog (representing Russia) invades the land of Israel, Gog will be destroyed.  Jesus and His immortalized saints will annihilate the enemy.  Moreover, Yahweh will send a conflagration to the motherland of Russia which shall be residing confidently.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

39:27 The return of the Jews at the moment is not seen by any other than Bible believers that God is working with the Jews. However when the kingdom is established God’s dealings with the Jews will be understood by all the world.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.2 The mountains of Israel represent the mountainous heartland of Israel, that is Judea and Samaria (The West Bank). We know that Israel shall be dwelling safely on the mountains of Israel when Russia and its allies invade the Land (Eze 38:8).

And so, let us keep watch as Israel creates more and more settlements in Judea and Samaria. Despite protests from the world community, settlements will go ahead because Yahweh has decreed that it shall be so.

The mountains of Israel, which are today barren, have settlements sprouting up on them. Soon, the mountains shall be truly settled as more and more Israelis occupy that area.

It is no surprise that it is the religious Jews who are spearheading the push for settlements, as they claim that the territory properly belongs to Israel by the promise of Yahweh.

V.4 Invading Russia and its allies will be destroyed by Jesus and the Redeemed on the mountains of Israel . This event is known as Armageddon (Rev 16:16). It is Yahweh’s judgement on the nations.

But, before peace ensues, and the Kingdom is established, further trouble will occur as Catholic-led Europe will confront Jesus and the Redeemed. They too will be quashed. Then, the Kingdom period will begin.

Stay tuned to the notes on Revelation for further details.

V.11 Hamon-gog means the multitude of Gog.

V.16 Hamonah means multitude.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

39:2 Doubtless God will think that she has decided what to do however we must note that God says ‘I will ...’ marking the point that God is in control of world affairs – Dan 4:17


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - John  5
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to John 5 online in the King James Version
Listen to John 5 online in the New International Version

 

v.3 tells us that there were a multitude of people there waiting for the stirring of the waters. So why did Jesus pick just this one man? As always, it must be because just this one man had the faith to be healed. As always it is a remnant that are saved.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
5:1 John mentions a number of feasts in his gospel record. Four of them are Passovers. These are all of them
John 2:13 is the first passover mentioned in John
John 5:1 is the second passover mentioned in John
John 6:4 is the third passover mentioned in John
John 11:55 is the fourth passover mentioned in John

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

The narrative of the healing of the lame man at the pool echoes language used of Israel just before they entered the land of Canaan under Joshua.

5:5   thirty and eight years  Deuteronomy 2:14 
5:6   Long time  Deuteronomy 1:6 
5:8   Rise up  Deuteronomy 2:11 

This man had been n the 'wilderness' and was about to enter a kind of 'rest' effected by 'Joshua' / Jesus. Israel should have seen that Jesus was bringing the true freedom which Joshua did not actually bring. (Hebrews 4:6)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:19 Whist we may use Jesus' comment to 'prove' that he was not equal to God - and this is true - we must realise that Jesus is advertising his total reliance on the words and teaching of his Father in heaven.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
5:27 Jesus has been given authority to execute judgment because he is 'the son of man'. The relationship between these two issues - judgment and son of man is this. Because of Jesus' humanity he is qualified to pronounce judgment on mortals - he shares their feelings (Matt 8:17, Heb 5:1-2)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

V.6 Could anyone doubt that a sick man would like to be made whole, or that the patients came thither, and this man had returned again and again, just in hope of a cure? But Jesus asked the question. "Wilt thou be made whole"  By making him detail his case to deepen in him the feeling of entire helplessness, without the One who would heal him. Not unlike our helplessness without him, the more we realize and think about it, the stronger each one of us become.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.30 In this chapter Jesus clearly illustrates that he is the Son of God and not God Himself.  He has derived His life and power from His Father.  He is dedicated to doing His Father's will, being the image of His Father (2Cor 4:4).

The close relationship of Jesus to His Father and their oneness of purpose should not cloud the fact that Jesus and His Father are two separate persons.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

5:11-12 Whilst it might be that the man who had been healed did not know the name of the man who had healed him it may well be that he describes him in the way he does to emphasise, without saying it, that if a man could heal him then he had the right also to allow the man to carry his bed on the Sabbath.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
HONOUR
 
"Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgement to the Son, that all may honour the Son just as they honour the Father. He who does not honour the Son does not honour the Father who sent him." (John 5:22-23)
 
The word "honour" that is used in these verses is the one that is also used in the New Testament quotations of the fifth commandment, "Honour your father and mother." The same word is also used when we read, "These people honour me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me." (Matt 15:8)
 
We can see from these uses that giving honour to Christ is a way of life. It is not something that is just tacked on to the end of prayers: "...through Jesus name, amen." Rather it is a way of life that honours Jesus and puts him in a high place in every aspect. It involves honouring him with our lips - giving him praise and lifting him up before other people. It involves honouring him with our wealth, possessions, time and conversation as we would do for our parents. And it involves honouring him with our hearts as we put him in pride of place above everything else that is important in our lives.
 
In honouring Jesus, we honour God. let's give them the honour they deserve today and every day.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Robert

WALKING IN THE LIGHT

There is an interesting play on the word "light". In verse 35 Jesus called John "a burning and shinning light". The Greek word "luchnos", indicates, a portable lamp, such as was used at night to travel short distances. The light would flare up for a moment and then flicker out. And so was John. He flared up for a moment in time so that people could see themselves for what they were, before the had to stand before the great and true "light" John 1:9 (Jesus)

Here is John 1:9, Jesus is referred to as the "true light". The Greek word "Phos" indicates a light that is absolute and underived, permanent. It's were we get the english word "phosphorous" from. The same word, interestingly enough, is used of God (1 Jn 1:5) So perfect did Jesus manifest God's character, that he reflected the very light of God.

We need to examine ourselves - are we walking in the light?


Peter Dulis [toronto west]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

5:37-38 In saying that the Jews had seen his miracles but had not believed that God had sent him Jesus is likening those Jews to Pharaoh who saw the miracle and yet did not believe that God had sent Moses - Exo 4:5


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
5:18 When the Jewish authorities saw the man carrying his bed on the Sabbath, in obedience to Christ's command, they criticized both him and the impotent man. Here we see a plot by the leaders being instigated to put Jesus to death, this was for two reasons; A) A violation of the law of the Sabbath and (B) blasphemy (making himself equal to God.)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

5:25 The ‘dead’ who hear are not those in the grave but those who are alive but unaware of the gospel. The voice that they would hear would be the voice of Jesus preaching life. Verse 28 then speaks of the resurrection.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.4 This verse is omitted in some manuscripts.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

5:10 On seeing the man carrying his bed it would have been more sensible for the leaders to ask why he was carrying the bed than to simply confront him. Likewise ourselves. We should not immediately jump to conclusions when we seen fellow believers doing things we are ‘sure’ are wrong. It is always beneficial to enquire why what we perceive to be an error is being performed.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.18 The Jews believed that their immortal, invisible God was unique (Deut 6:4). Then, how could a flesh-and-blood mortal man be His son? Jesus’ claim to be God’s son was not only preposterous to the Jews but blasphemous. That made Jesus worthy of death. And yet, they could not deny or explain Jesus’ miraculous works.

Christendom also, like those Jews, does not understand the relationship between Jesus and His Father. They believe that Jesus and His Father is indeed one God, who together with the Holy Spirit makes a triune God. This unreasonable doctrine of the Trinity was formulated in the fourth century A.D. at the Council of Nicaea. Followers of Christ before that could not have believed in the Trinity. This includes the apostles who possessed the Holy Spirit. How could these believers be in error?

The truth is that Yahweh, the God of Israel, is indeed an immortal, invisible unique God. Jesus is His Son because He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit (Yahweh‘s power) (Matt 1:20,21). But His mother was human, thus making Him a man. Jesus and His Father were one - in character and purpose. But they were, and remain, two separate persons.

V.21 For example, Yahweh raised the widow’s son in Sarepta through Elijah (1Kin 17:22); or the Shunamite’s son through Elisha (2Kin 4:32-35).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

 

V.2 In the Hebrew tongue Bethesda (KJV) is not accurate. In Aramaic called Bethesda (ESV) is accurate.

V.5 The crippled man of Israel had been bound by his infirmity for 38 years. He had no hope of being cured. But, Jesus cured him and freed him from the prison he was in.

I wonder if this man was symbolic of the nation of Israel.

Israel reached the Promised Land two years after leaving Egypt. They had a chance of going into the Land, but lacked faith. Yahweh was angry with this lack of faith and doomed the nation to be imprisoned in the wilderness for 38 years (Deut 2:14).

After its sojourn in the desert, Israel was reborn and allowed into the Land. As Israel entered the land, Joshua warned the nation that if they sinned, Yahweh would punish it worse than its punishment in the desert (Josh 24:20).

Jesus’ warning to the healed man reflects that of Joshua’s to Israel (v.14).

As the nation of Israel was liberated after 38 years, so was the crippled man. But only Jesus could support a complete healing and not the Law (Acts 4:12). The Law only promised death, whereas Jesus brought life (1Cor 15:56; 2Tim 1:10).

Perhaps this episode of the crippled man by the pool was a lesson to show Israel that only Jesus, the Messiah, could truly heal. The present healing of infirmities demonstrated that Jesus could, through the power of Yahweh, heal for all time.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

5:29 In speaking of a resurrection of life and a resurrection of damnation Jesus could well have had in mind Dan 12:1-2


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter