October 14

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 2Chronicles  3 and 4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 2Chronicles 3 online in the King James Version Listen to 2Chronicles 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to 2Chronicles 3 online in the New International Version Listen to 2Chronicles 4 online in the New International Version

 

3 v.10-13 These cherubim of very spectacular proportions, surely were the same representation of those that stood on the ark in the tabernacle. It seems that God gave them physical things which represented Him, presumably because he knew that they would have this tendency to want to worship idols, but still they did not respond. This temple was quite magnificent. It is a picture and a pattern to us, continuing from the tabernacle and reaching forward to the temple of Ezekiel's vision, showing us the kingdom in its many facets, which will be even more magnificent.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

3:6 Parvaim is not mentioned elsewhere in Scripture. This fact alone should make us realise that the record was written at the time of the events it records. Parvaim was clearly a location known to the people in the time of Solomon.

4:2 The molten sea did not have any counterpart in the tabernacle. This 'sea' was for the washing of the priests. The laver was for the washing of the animals that were to be sacrificed and answered to the similar vessel in the tabernacle.
We have to conclude that the molten sea described here was part of the pattern that God gave him to follow.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
As we remarked yesterday, we need to look at the effort that went into all this and be sure that we put the same effort into building God's things in our own lives. Nothing is more important than God's work and our meditation on His word. Everything we do should add, as it were, another stone or table or bowl or whatever to the temple which we build.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

3:1 Mount Moriah was the place where Abraham offered Isaac ad the place of the threshingfloor of Arunah the Jebusite (2 Samuel 24:16). The earlier events mentioned provided the explanation as to where the temple was to be built.

4:1 The altar of brass Solomon made is four times as big as the one that was made in the wilderness (Exodus 27:1). The absence of other details in addition to it's size might mean that the details given in Exodus would form the basis for it's manufacture. Or maybe the absence of mention of stave to carry it were to indicate that the altar was now in a permanent resting place.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

3:3 Notice that Solomon was 'instructed' in matters relating to the building of the house. David received a 'pattern' (1 Chronicles 28:11, 12, 18,19) so clearly he did more than just pass the pattern on to Solomon. He spoke with him about how to do the work as well.

4:11 Huram's involvement in manufacturing the furniture for the tabernacle foreshadows the inclusion on the gentiles (you and I) in the living temple - the church of the living God. The fulfilment of the promise to David that He would build him an house' (2 Samuel 7:27)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
QUALITY IN DETAIL

I recently saw a television programme that documented a number of people building their dream homes. The houses they built ranged from low budget accommodation through to million dollar mansions. The thing that showed the difference in quality between them was the attention to detail. The million dollar house was perfect in every minute detail, whereas those building cheaper houses had to put up with imperfections and flaws.

When it came to Solomon's building of the temple of the LORD, we can see the Solomon not only looked at the big picture, but that he also made sure that the quality of the temple was as good as it could be, by paying attention to every last detail. 2 Chronicles 3 shows us some of how detailed it was. It was the ultimate in quality, the very best for the LORD.

We might not always be able to afford quality, but we can make sure that our lives are quality lives for the LORD. We can do this by paying attention to the detail in our actions. What do we say or do in those moments when we are caught off guard? How do we act when we are tired or provoked? What do we use our time for? How do we fill in our free time?

Let's build ourselves quality lives for the LORD our God, perfect in every detail.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Robert

3:2 So Solomon reigned for three years before beginning to build the temple. This might seem rather slow given that David had already prepared the materials (1Chron 22:14) and the plans were already available (1Chron 28:11). However we should realise that Solomon was establishing the kingdom and developing a settled situation in which the temple was to be built.

4 The detailed description of the way that things were made for the temple focus, not on the outward structure of the building, but on the various items used in service to God. This highlights to us it is not outward appearance that matters - even though the temple was 'exceeding magnifical' (1Chron 22:5)  - but rather the way that worship is shown is more important.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
 4:1 Steps must have necessary for ascending so elevated an alter, but the use of these steps could be no longer forbidden.(Exo 20:26) The thickness of the metal used for this alter is nowhere given; but, supposing it to have been three inches thick, the whole weight of the metal would have exeeded two hundred tons. This would support Bro. Peter's comment (2003), that the alter was now in a permanent resting place. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

Solomon made 2 huge cherubim to go inside the Most Holy Place. Their wings touched in the centre, and altogether were 20 cubits or 30 feet long, touching the wall at either end (2Chron 3:10-13).  The ark of the covenant (Exo 25:10), which was only 2 ½ cubits long (= less than 4 feet long), was to be stood in front of these 2 wonderful cherubim (see 2Chron 5:7).

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
2Chron 3:8-13 - The Most Holy Place is where the presence of God dwelled and is considered by some a representation on earth of heaven. The overlayed gold likely represents divine character or nature. We note in vs. 9 the gold nails weighed 50 shekels which is the jubilee number (Lev 25:10) suggesting mercy to a multitude, a returning to an inheritance, freedom and liberty (from sin and death?). The length of each wing of each cherubim was 5 cubits suggesting grace or mercy. Thanks to Christ yielding to his Father's will, we look toward a future age of mercy where God's will is to be done on earth as it is in heaven 2Sam 7:12-16; Luke 1:31-33; Matt 25:34; Isa 2:2-4; Matt 6:10.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

3:9  On reading of nails which were made of gold I cannot help but think that they served a decorative rather than structural purpose s gold is such a soft metal.

4:6-8  Does anyone have an explanations as to why there were ten lavers, candlesticks and tables?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
3:3 David must have spent a lot of time with Solomon, in giving him the instructions for the house of God. There would have been a lot of time spent giving verbal direction. We find it hard to think that there were no written plans and specifications provided by David. This would have been a tremendously large set of "blue prints", and taken many, many hours of preparation.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

3:13 When we read that the feet and faces were ‘inward’ we should understand this as being ‘towards the house’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

4:2-4 The sea contained water and rested upon oxen. This is symbolic of the work of God’s servants. Water equates with the Scriptures – Eph 5:26 – The oxen speak of service. The servants uphold the water of life in their preaching.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

3:1 It is supposed that Mount Moriah is the place where Abraham was ready to sacrifice Isaac as a burnt offering (Gen 22:2).  However, it is unclear whether the land of Moriah is referring to Mount Moriah. 

Nevertheless, the spiritual connection between the site of the temple and Isaac's sacrifice is strong.  Yahweh, having been pleased with the faith of Abraham, spared Isaac.  He said that He would provide a lamb (Gen 22:8).  That lamb was Jesus. 

The temple is where Yahweh placed His Name (1Kin 8:29).  The temple was built on Mount Moriah.  Jesus is the spiritual temple (Matt 26:61). All true believers of Jesus are part of that temple (1Cor 3:16).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

3:1 David had ‘appointed’ RV the place where the temple was to be built further reinforcing the point that David had done the planning and the place was specifically chosen by David.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

3:9 Two things need clarifying in this verse. First, it is more likely that a bolt, screw, or pin is meant than a nail. A nail weighing about 2lb (0.9 kg) is highly unlikely. Second, the material for the bolt was probably bronze overlaid with gold. It could not have been made of solid gold, as gold is far too soft a metal to be used as supports.

4:1 Whenever you read brass in the KJV understand it to mean bronze. Brass, which is an alloy of copper and zinc, was a later invention.

For your information: By about 20 B.C.-A.D. 20, metalworkers around the Mediterranean Sea were able to distinguish zinc ores from those containing tin and began blending zinc with copper to make brass coins and other items. Most of the zinc was derived by heating a mineral known as calamine, which contains various zinc compounds. Starting in about 300 A.D., the brass metalworking industry flourished in what is now Germany and The Netherlands (History of Brass).

For simple calculation, we can consider a cubit to measure 18 inches (46 cm). And, so it is easy to figure out the approximate measurement of the altar: It had a surface area of 30 feet (9 m) x 30 feet (9 m), and stood 15 feet (4.5 m) high. Obviously, steps must have been made to allow the priests to work easily with the surface of the altar.

Originally, priests would not have been allowed to use steps (Exo 20:26). However, since the dress code for priests was introduced, the problem of immodesty was eliminated (Exo 28:42).

4:5 There seems to be a contradiction with 1Kin 7:26. Perhaps, the difference is in the accompanying language. In 1 Kings 7:26, the sea contained two thousand baths (KJV); whereas in 4:5 the sea received and held three thousand baths (KJV).

And so, 1 Kings 7:26 states the actual capacity of the sea; whereas 4:5 states the capacity of the sea plus the extra (received) water to keep water in the sea from becoming stagnant. This extra water would be needed to keep the water in the sea flowing and fresh.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

3:1 The items that Solomon made for the temple according to the pattern that David had indicates that the items made were ‘of God’ though there is no command given – such as in Exo 25 - Exo 27 regarding the furniture of the Tabernacle - that these things should be made.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

2Chron 3:5 - "greater house" refers to the Holy Place or main chamber of the temple.

2Chron 3:11-12;2Chron 4:2,6-8 - numerous mentions of  "5" thought by some to suggest "mercy, (or) grace". 2Chron 4:4-5 - several mentions of  "3" thought by some to suggest "divine perfection, (or) sacrifice (and/or) resurrection".

2Chron 3:16;2Chron 4:13 - our sacrificed redeemer is like the red pomegranate packed with seed and so he shall redeem many unto eternal life.

2Chron 3:17 - the pillars "Jachin" and "Boaz" were at the entrance - could they represent/foreshadow Jew and Gentile seeking entrance to the future earthly kingdom through Christ?


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Ezekiel 40
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Ezekiel 40 online in the King James Version
Listen to Ezekiel 40 online in the New International Version

 

v.5-7 - There seems to be an emphasis here on squareness, reflecting the shape of the holy of holies of the tabernacle - that which was opened to us by the blood of Christ, whose sacrifice broke down the middle wall of partition between us and God. Is there a connection between these chambers and the 'abiding places' in 'my Father's house' that Jesus speaks of in John 14:2?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
40:1 10 beginning of year 20 - 14 after city smitten
40:2 set ... a very high mountain Revelation 21:10
40:3 a measuring reed Zechariah 2:1 Revelation 21:15
40:11 'Length ... Breadth' in the early part of Scripture relates to the measurements of the Tabernacle Exodus  25:10,17,23 26:2,8,16 27:18 28:16 30:2 36:9,15,21 37:1 ,6,10,25 38:1,18 39:9 And then elements of Solomon's Temple 1 Kings 6:2,20 7:27 2 Chronicles 3:8 4:1 And then is found in Ezekiel's description of a temple Ezekiel 40:11,20,21,25,36,49 41:2,4 42:2
So when Zechariah uses this language Zechariah 2:2 5:2 He is clearly drawing on these earlier uses
The New Testament has two interesting uses. Speaking of the love of Christ speaks of the dimension of the love of Christ in terms of the language of the tabernacle and temple. Ephesians 3:18 Whereas the city of Revelation 21:16 is spoken of in similar terms to mark the continuity with the Old Testament theme.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
Everything is carefully measured to fit and to be correct and precise and perfect. So it should be with our lives as we present them to God.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
40:2 During his temptations Jesus was shown all the kingdoms of the world from an ' exceeding high mountain' (Matthew 4:8) He resisted the temptation. Maybe he thought, from that 'mountain' abut what Ezekiel was shown from his exceeding high mountain and so resisted the temptation. Can we, by having a vision, resist the temptation to take hold on short term benefits?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
40:1 this date marks the 25th year of Jehoiakim's captivity - this is how Ezekiel had been marking time through the prophecy. SO we are about 13 and a half years into the 70 years captivity. The vision of the temple, therefore, was to be a word of encouragement to those who were in Babylon.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
PAY ATTENTION
Are we ever guilty of reading the word of God without concentrating on what we are reading, only to get to the end of the chapter or chapters to realize that we cannot remember anything about what we have just read? Several times I have caught myself out doing just that, and I have discovered the Word of God going in one ear and out the other. If it happens to you too then maybe God is speaking to us today through Ezekiel. He says, "Son of man, look with your eyes and hear with your ears and pay attention to everything I am going to show you, for that is why you have been brought here. Tell the house of Israel everything you see." (Ezekiel 40 v 4)
We too must pay attention to God when he speaks to us. When we read his word let us picture it clearly, let us see it and understand it. Let us listen for his message to us, hear him speaking personally to us through his word. And to make sure that we have learned what we have read, share it with someone - tell them what God has told you. By doing this we will benefit so much more from God's word. May He bless you through it.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Robert
40:1 - This verse indicates the reason why we believe there is a period of 50 years between the return of Christ and the opening of the Temple.
Consider: "the five and twentieth year", dated from the fall of Jehoiachin comprises 11 years of Zedekiah's reign, and a further 14 years to this vision. Therefore, 50 years from Josiah's passover(2 Chron 35) which was a jubille year(and typifies the return of Christ). Hence, this indicates the Temple will be opened in a Jubilee year from the return of Christ.

Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Matt

40:6 In being taken to the "gate  which looketh toward the east" Ezekiel is arriving at the city in the direction that the glory of God left the city (Eze 9:9) and will return (Eze 43:4).


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

V.46 Zadok was of the line from Aaron. He had the high priesthood confered on him Solomon, who had set aside the family of Ithamar, because of the part which Abiathar had taken in the rebellion of Adonijah. (1Kin 1:7, 1Kin 2:26-27)


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

There is critical information here that we do well to recognize in order to best interpret the later chapters in the propecy (i.e. chapter 44). 
Two Classes of Priests are introduced here with distinction. Both are Levitical priest, but the first, are "keepers of the charge of the house" and correspond to chater 44:10-14, and 17 onwards.

The second class are "keepers of the charge of the altar"-
Eze 40:45,46 and correspond to Chapter 44:15,16.
Later we will learn why the distiction was made due to past practice. Malachi 2 will suffice to show the failure of the priesthood in keeping the commandments. Those who didn't go astray, will be resurrected to immortality along with the other faithful making up the Sons of Zadok(righteousness) class after the order which is established in the King, Christ(Melchizadok order).


Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Matt
LOOK AND LISTEN
 
Ezekiel was about to get an important prophecy.  Fourteen years after the destruction of Jerusalem, a time that must have seemed almost hopeless to the captives, Ezekiel was given a prophecy of the future that was to be greatly encouraging to those who were longing for their land.  The prophecy of the new temple and the city next to it would have given the exiles a hope to hang on to and  reason to live.  It would have reassured their faith in God, enabled them to see a better time and helped them to make the most of the situation they were in.
 
As Ezekiel was about to have the prophecy revealed to him, he was told, "Son of man, look with your eyes and hear with your ears and pay attention to everything I am going to show you, for that is why you have been brought here.  Tell the house of Israel everything you see." (Eze 40:4
 
Just as Israel were, we too are at a time when we desperately need a vision to hold on to, that will keep us on track living a godly life.  Pictures of what is to come have been given to us through the word of God.  But it is up to us to look with our eyes and hear with our ears and to pay attention to what God tells us.  If we don't, we will lose sight of the vision and lose our grip on our faith.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Robert
There is now a 13 year gap. The last date we had was in Eze 32:1, the twelfth year. Now, with the vision of the future temple, we are in the 25th year of Judah’s captivity (Eze 40:1). Although of-course, it could be that chapters 32-40 are spaced out over the 13 years, but the dates are not given. This future temple shown to Ezekiel was to be a real incentive to the captive Jews to want to go back to their land and to worship God. As usual in the Old Testament, the temple was to be the centre of their lives, and occupied almost all the remainder of Ezekiel’s prophecy.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

40:3 The idea of a measuring reed is taken up in Zech 2:1  – surely an encouragement after the exile to the people to think of the return as a fulfilment of the things that Ezekiel saw.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

40:46 In saying that the "sons of Zadok" will have a particular task to do we have to conclude that in the kingdom the exact part of a tribe from which a man descends will be know. This will be achieved by Jesus – Mal 3:3 – who will ‘purge the sons of Levi’, that is establish their lineage.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
As we consider the measurements of the temple, the most amazing thing is the size of the whole building. It is described as a city, which says a lot about its size. Taking a conservative 19 inches for a cubit and a hand breadth, it being five hundred reed round about, this would would work out to be a mile or 1600 meters long. We remember visiting a large city in the United over 50 years ago and a brother pointing out a car manufacturing plant, and saying that the temple would take up more space than this enormous plant. When we compare an area over a mile square, we can get an idea of the size of the temple.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

40:2 Here Ezekiel sees ‘the frame of a city’ and what he sees is a glorious picture which contrasts with the evil that he sees in the city – Eze 8:3


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.1 etc. The details of the temple start in this chapter and continue until the end of the Book of Ezekiel. The Jews in exile would have been encouraged that a new temple was to be built.  But no temple was built in their lifetimes. 

And so, the temple described here would have been taken to mean one that would be built when the Messiah came.  The dimensions of this temple do not relate to the refurbished second temple of Herod the Great. That temple was destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans. 

Today, religious Jews are waiting for their Messiah to appear and for a third temple to be built. That will happen after Jesus returns to the earth, and is recognized by the Jews as their Messiah.

Beware of religious commentators who think that Ezekiel's temple is a metaphor for orderly spiritual living. These commentators do not believe that Jesus is coming back to earth to set up His kingdom in which the inhabitants will learn of Yahweh's ways.  

These commentators believe, erroneously, in a reward in which souls go to heaven at death.  With that belief one would be hard pressed to believe that Ezekiel's temple would be a real building on earth. 

But, the Bible says that the reward of the faithful followers of Jesus is on earth (Rev 22:12). Those who are rewarded will serve as priests in the kingdom (Rev 1:6; 5:10).  And what would priests be without a temple?


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

40:4 In seeing with his eyes and haring with his ears Ezekiel is very unlike those who captivity war prophesied because they would not here or see – Isa 6:10


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

WE ARE THE GATES

 

When Paul wrote to the Corinthians, he asked them, "Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you received from God?" (1Cor 6:19)

 

If our body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, then some of the temple design must contain principles we can apply to our lives as we live for the Lord. The temple in Ezekiel's prophecy is an appropriate one to think about in this regard. Much of it's description involves gates and entrances. The gates around the temple in Ezekiel's prophecy were there for the purpose of people coming in to worship the LORD. Each gate had a portico over it to protect the worshippers from the sun, wind and rain as they entered. The portico was a shelter from the outside weather. There were four gates around the temple courtyard allowing easy access for people to come and go from any direction.

 

As a temple of the LORD, we also need to have the doors of our hearts wide open for those who want to worship the LORD to be able to find him there. As people come to us to find the LORD, they need to find us accessable, open, and a shelter from the storms they face in their lives. We are not the final stop. It is God they need to find, but here and now, we are the gates through whom people can find him. Are we open and pointing the way to the LORD?


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

 

V.2 On which was a structure like a city to the south (ESV) implies that the temple is as large as a city. But, in order for that to occur, the mountain upon which the temple sits must be a plateau.

When Jesus manifests Himself in Jerusalem, with power, there will be a strong earthquake which will change the surrounding topography (Zech 14:4). It is at this time that Mount Zion will be transformed into an enormous plateau, on which the temple will be built, and from which divine rule will emanate (Mic 4:7).

V.3 The man in Ezekiel’s vision is Jesus. He will build the temple and rule from Zion (Zech 6:13).

V.5 etc. For architectural renderings of the third temple see: The Temple Of Ezekiel's Prophecy by Henry Sulley available from Logos at: http://www.logos.org.au


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

Sir Isaac Newton, the famous scientist who discovered gravity and documented the three laws of physics, also studied prophecy. One of his treasured subjects was the temple. His writing on this chapter can be found in Manuscript 434 at this link, where you will find his drawing of the gateway:

http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00079

I've imported a scan of his drawing and scaled it, making up for some skewing, and have come up with the following dimensions. It appears to fit very well, and given Sir Isaac's authority I would tend to go with his findings:

Newton Gateway


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

40:2 In setting Ezekiel upon a ‘very high mountain’ we see the pattern of the way in which God showed John – Rev 21:10 – the ‘holy Jerusalem’. Whilst Ezekiel saw a pattern of a real temple that will be built as a place of worship for all nations these things are a pattern also of the glorification of the saints.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - John  6
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to John 6 online in the King James Version
Listen to John 6 online in the New International Version

 

v.44 reminds us of the need for God's intervention in every aspect of our lives. Even the decision that we thought we made ourselves to turn to Him, was orchestrated by Him. We can do nothing without God, so let us not deceive ourselves into thinking that we can. v.65, ch.5:44, 12:37-40
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
6:15 In the gospels there are a number of times when Jesus took himself away from the crowds up into a mountain. Matthew 5:1 8:1 14:23 15:29 17:1 24:3 28:16 Mark 3:13 6:46 9:2 13:3 Luke 6:12 9:28 22:39 John 6:3 15 8:1 It seems that this was either for solitude for himself of privacy in order to instruct his disciples.
We should note that whilst Jesus went about preaching and teaching and devoting himself to the Father's work he did take time out to fulfil his own personal needs.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

These links with the narrative of the 'fall'

6:37   I will in no wise cast out  Genesis 3:24 
6:51   eat live for ever   Genesis 3:22 
6:58   eateth live for ever  Genesis 3:22 

Demonstrate that those 'in Christ' are freed from the condemnation of the curse. Jesus later offers the reward of sharing in the tree of life at the resurrection (Revelation 2:7)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:14 In referring to Jesus as 'that prophet' the people see Jesus as the one spoken of in Deuteronomy 18:15. So they were more astute than the leaders who had asked John the Baptist the same question (John 1:21)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
 6:4 It is now passover time - a year on from 5:1
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

"I will raise him up at the last day" Christ leaves no doubt that the will of God is that all that believeth on him, should be given eternal life; hence we have this phrase repeated four times: V.39; 40: 41: 54 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Vs.41,51,62 are often quoted as proof by some of the pre-existence of Christ.  However, like all scripture, a single theme must be taken in relation to other scripture. 

Clearly, Jesus is comparing himself to the manna, the bread from heaven, which appeared miraculously to feed the Children of God (Exo 16:14,15; v. 58).  The similarity between the two is that they both had their origin in heaven (i.e. God produced them). 

The manna was produced on earth by the divine hand hence it did not come floating down from the great reaches of space.  Likewise, Jesus was produced on earth, by God's power, and did not literally come down from heaven. 

Notice in v.62 that Jesus calls himself son of man.  Being a flesh and blood human precluded His appearance in heaven (1John 4:12).  Only after He was raised from the dead and immortalized did He join His Father in heaven (Acts 1:9-11; Rom 6:9; 8:34).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

V.54 We have just read in V.53 "Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you", but, now Christ goes one step further, as he says, whoever does so "hath eternal life".


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
Christ is the true bread and the true tabernacle - John 6:32,33,51; Heb 8:1-2; 9:11-15, 23-25.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

6:27 ‘labour … perisheth’ quotes Isa 55:2 where the free food is offered. This is what Jesus has just done. In the narrative, though in a different place at a different time. So we see that the theme of feeding is built into the chapter even though the events took place at different locations.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
LET NOTHING BE WASTED
 
In the excitement of the story of the feeding of the five thousand, I have always overlooked the words of Jesus at clean-up time. After everyone had had enough to eat, Jesus said, "Gather the pieces that are left over. Let nothing be wasted." (John 6:12)
 
Of the five small barley loaves and the two small fish, there were twelve baskets full of leftovers. We never hear of what happened to the food that was left over but the words of Jesus tell us quite clearly that they would have been put to good use. Maybe they were sent into neighbouring towns to feed the poor, or taken home by the multitudes to feed their families. Whatever it was, Jesus' instruction was very clear: "Let nothing be wasted."
 
Miracles like the feeding of the five thousand are not so common today, but the principle of letting nothing go to waste is one that should be taken to heart by us all - especially in this affluent and throw-away society. All we have in this life has been given to us by God. Those gifts are for our pleasure and to meet our needs but especially to use in the service of our God. So whether it be income, possessions, skills, talents or other gifts, let's let nothing be wasted but make sure everything we can is used to its full extent to the glory of God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Robert

6:10 The feeding of the 5,000 is recorded in all four gospel records Matt 14:19, Mark 6:39, Luke 9:16. As such it is the only miracle recorded in all four gospels.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 6:15 Notice how Jesus avoids the adulation when the people wanted ’to make him king’ he went into a mountain to pray – prayer was Jesus’ solution to stressful and difficult situations.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.12  Jesus was clear that no food fragments should be left.  This miracle, of providing temporal food, mirrors the divine provision of manna in the wilderness.  There too, nothing was to be left over (Exo 16:17-19).  

In relating the wilderness experience to the people, Jesus gave them the spiritual understanding that the manna represented Him (vs.32-35). 

Jesus taught His disciples that bread signified His body (Matt 26:26). 

Paul explained that true believers are members of Jesus' body (Rom 12:5). 

Each member, therefore, is a piece of the loaf (bread = body of Jesus).  Each member is precious, should be respected, and never discarded (please see 1 Cor Ch. 12).  


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

6:7 Philip’s incredulous comment matches Moses – Num 11:21-22 – when God says He will provide meat for Israel in the wilderness.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.9 Barley was a poor man’s grain. It cost 67% less than the same amount of wheat. Perhaps, apart from the miracle of actually feeding the multitude, a lesson in humility was being made.

If a person is humble and willing to be transformed, Yahweh will enlarge that person (1Cor 3:18; James 4:6,10).

V.19 Five and twenty or thirty furlongs (KJV) is equivalent to three or four miles (ESV).

Some data re. the Sea of Galilee: Max. length 21 km (13 mi); Max. width 13 km (8.1 mi); Surface area 166 km2 (64 sq mi); Average depth 25.6 m (84 ft); Max. depth 43 m (140 ft); Water volume 4 km3 (0.96 cu mi); Shore length1 53 km (33 mi) (Wikipedia).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

6:51,58  ‘eat ... live forever’ quotes Gen 3:22. So we see that those who come to Jesus are, so to speak, return into Eden before the fall – that is they regain the fellowship that Adam and Eve had with God before they sinned.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter