|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 10
v.15 - The suggestion here is that this was not an act of Rehoboam's own will,
but one placed there by God in order to further His purpose. There are many arguments
revolving round whether God intervenes in this way, but this verse suggests that
He does. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
10:15 Whilst there is no record of the prophecy of Ahijah in the Chronicles account it can be found in 1 Kings 11:29-30. Further we know that Ahijah wrote down his words which he spoke to Jeroboam 1 Kings 12:15 even though the record is no longer available to us. 11:1-4 So Rehoboam's kingdom was a poor reflection of that which his father handed down to him. However it was 'of the LORD so the decision to attack Israel had to be abandoned. Thus the sorry state of the kingdom of Judah was confirmed. Rehoboam must have returned to Jerusalem with an heavy heart. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:14
- together with the pronouncements made by Rehoboam about how he would treat the
people in the earlier of today's chapters, this make us realise just how bad the
situation was. Things were wrong from the start in both Israel and Judah. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch.10 - And so we pass on to the next king - but we have been told very little, really, about the reign of Solomon. The focus has been upon the building of the temple. 11:18 And so it seems that Rehoboam sought to reinforce his position on the throne of David by marrying into David's family. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
10:4 So whilst the kingdom was described as a time of peace (1 Kings 4:25) and the queen of Sheba was impressed by how things went in the kingdom (1 Chronicles 9:6) by the end of his reign Solomon had really spoiled things. The wonderful heritage that David had left him was spoilt and so God's glory, whilst still in the temple, was not seen in the way that Solomon reigned in the latter part of his reign. 11:13 So Jeroboam was really into false worship. This doubtless explains whey the Levites migrated to Judah (11:14) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| "LET US
NOT GIVE UP MEETING TOGETHER" When Jereboam became king of Israel and he had abandoned the LORD God of Israel by making and worshipping idols, the Priests and Levites and everyone who wanted to serve the LORD came to Jerusalem because the LORD was still worshiped there. There was an exodus of all the godly people of Israel to Judah. They strengthened the kingdom of Judah and supported Rehoboam during the time that he walked with God. There is a lesson for us here. The people in Judah could all strengthen each other in the LORD, but the people in Israel began a rapid downhill slide to their destruction. The lesson for us is to stick together with people of the same faith so that we can strengthen each other and stay strong for the LORD our God. If we stay in isolation, the attitudes and philosophies of the people around us will rub off on us and we can easily be dragged into their downward spiral. So, "Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another - and all the more as you see the day approaching." (Hebrews 10 v 25) Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
10:1 David and Solomon had been crowned in Jerusalem so why does Rehoboam go to Shechem to be crowned? Maybe he was aware of the beginnings of the division between the north and the south and so went to Shechem in the north in order to try to retain the whole of the nation - after all it was the place where Joshua had called the people before sending them into their inheritance (Josh 24:1) 11:23 In telling us that Rehoboam 'desired many wives' we realise that he violated the warning of Deut 17:17. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:17 For three years all went well. The temple services were well supported, the feasts and the service of praise continued. Worshippers continued to come to Jerusalem from all the tribes of Israel, and they, together with the Levites who flocked to him from the north. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
The use of the word "devils" in 2Chron 11:15 is most unusual. It's normally translated as goats or kids. So I presume it means that Jeroboam made idols in the shape of goats and calves, as in fact the NIV says. There are only 4 uses of the word "devils" in the Old Testament, and they all refer to idols.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
|
11:15 Animals had been a source of worship by pagan nations since Babel. Israel worshipped a golden calf in the wilderness during Moses absence on Mount Sinai ( Exo 32:4). Here we see Jeroboam repeating the practice in his rebellion.The word devils (KJV) goat idols (ESV) in Hebrew, is sair which means hairy. The same word is used to describe the appearance of Esau (Gen 27:11). The word became associated with goats as hairy creatures (especially the hairy Syrian or Mamber goat which is prevalent in the Near East).Isaiah foretold that the destroyed Babylon would be a place where shaggy goats (satyrs) would dwell (Isa 13:21). One of the objects of goat worship in mythology was the satyr, a woodland god. The appearance of the satyr was that of a human form with the head, horns, thighs and tail of a goat. This pagan form has been adopted in world cultures as representing the popular idea of the devil. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| There is one factor in the life of Rehoboam and his family which must not be overlooked. We are told that his mother was Naamah, an Ammonitess. 1Kin 14:21 His parentage therefore was a result of one of the foreign alliances made by Solomon. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 2Chron 10:4,5,12,13,14; Matt 11:28-30 - Christ makes our burden light and offers us rest. Rehoboam rejected being Christlike. When sin is our master we have no freedom from death nor do we have a day of rest to hope for. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
10:1 The focus of Solomon’s reign is it’s majesty and glory and Solomon’s wisdom. A wonderful foretaste of the kingdom of God – but it was not the fulfilment of all that God had promised to David, it was but a shadow. SO we move swiftly on to the break up of that kingdom. The way that the record moves on so quickly marks that point. 11:16 There was a steady trickle of Godly people moving from the north to the south. First the faithful priests left to go to Judah and that was followed by the people. There is evidence, therefore, that not all in the northern kingdom of Israel were party to the idolatrous worship of Jeroboam. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:4 The words of Shemaiah were heeded by the people. We see here that the people were more disposed to accept the direction of the prophet, than the king was. Rehoboam could see that without the support of the people, nothing would be served by going ahead with his military ambition, hence he concentrated on the consolidation of his kingdom. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
11:8 Gath means winepress. There were many cities throughout the land that were called Gath. To distinguish one from another, they had names attached, such as Gath-Rimmon or Gath-Hepher. We do not know the precise Gath described here, but we do know that it refers to a city in Judah and not the celebrated Philistine city of the same name. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:6-8 When we see that Rehoboam took counsel with the old men and then the young men we might be tempted to think that he should have listened to the old men. In fact he should not have been asking either group. He should have been asking God what he should do. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:5,23 During these three years of peace, Rehoboam kept the people busy with many defensive undertakings. During this time some fifteen cities were fortified and provisioned, and given over to some of his twenty eight sons. Tomorrow we start reading with great sadness the sad comment on what we call human nature. 2Chron 12:1 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
LISTEN
God gave us two ears and one mouth. This means we should do twice as much listening as we do speaking.
I remember making a pinecone owl at a church camp when I was a child. The owl sat on a little wooden base that had this poem on it:
A wise old owl sat in an oak,
The more he heard, the less he spoke;
The less he spoke, the more he heard;
Why aren't we all like that wise old bird?
It is also a well known fact that the skill of counselling is not so much a skill of giving right advice, but of listening and asking the right questions to draw people out. Often it is a matter of people talking through their problems to a listening ear that solves the problem, rather than any ground breaking advice that we might speak.
What a shame Rehoboam was not the listening type. When Israel came to Rehoboam with a request, he refused to listen to them. As a consequence, the kingdom was torn in two and Rehoboam lost most of Israel to someone who would listen - Jeroboam. "When all Israel saw that their king refused to listen to them, they answered the king: 'What share do we have in David, what part in Jesse's son? To your tents O Israel! Look after your own house, O David!'" (2Chron 10:16)
Let's learn the lesson and open our ears to the people around us. Let's listen and respond to their need using the ears God gave us as best we can. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
DEFENCE
When Rehoboam built up the fortified cities to defend Judah against possible attacks from Israel, he did this: "He strengthened their defences and put commanders in them, with supplies of food, olive oil and wine. He put shields and spears in all the cities and made them very strong." (2Chron 11:11-12)
The steps Rehoboam took to strengthen the cities are worth thinking about as we strengthen our own faith in Jesus Christ.
"He strengthened their defences." We too need to continually strengthen our defences. Reading the word of God and praying are two ways we can strengthen our faith immeasurably.
"He put commanders in them." Taking our lead from Godly men and women is a great help when our faith is under pressure. The greatest leader we should look to is Jesus Christ.
"With supplies of food, olive oil and wine." Staying healthy is just as important as bearing up under attack. A starving, thirsty or wounded defence force is as bad as a defeated army. We need to keep ourselves strong, drawing from the encouragement of God's word, the healing we can gain from the church, and the strength of the spirit.
"He put shields and spears in all their cities." We need to put on the full armour of God.
So let us, like Rehoboam, build up our defences and be strong in the Lord, ready for any attack. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
10:19 The rebellion against ‘the house of David’ was not simply a rejection of the line of David. It is a rejection of God for He had chosen David Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
10:11 scorpions in the KJV, does not mean the desert creatures with stings in their tails. Here, scorpions refer to whips which have knots in them. These inflict more hurt and damage than ordinary whips without knots. The Romans used whips with fragments of metal or bone tied into their strands. These would cut open the flesh and inflict great pain. This was the kind of whip that scourged the Lord Jesus (Matt 27:26). 11:14 The reason that Jeroboam kicked out the Levites is that he did not want the people of Israel to join with Judah. He feared the Levites would influence the people to do this (1Kin 12:26). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:1 So after what seems – in the record – to be a very short time – the glory of the kingdom is beginning to wane. Such is the way of man. Left to his own devices he will destroy the wonderful things that God has instituted. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch10:16,17 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
10:8 Rehoboam showed no respect to the old men and refused their counsel (Lev 19:32; Prov 16:31). Instead, he hearkened to the counsel of young men who were impetuous and foolhardy (Ecc 11:9,10). 11:16 Although Jeroboam took control of the 10 northern tribes, there were some in Israel who could not be separated from Jerusalem for worship. While most remained in Israel, these defectors came over to Judah. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:19 The account of Solomon’s kingdom has only occupied 10 chapters in the second book of Chronicles – though it lasted 40 years. Maybe an indication that wonderful as it was it did not last and therefore required little comment from God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2Chron 10:5,12,14 - a return in three days resulting in bad news not good and making the yoke heavy emphasizes how Rehoboam was almost an opposite of Christ. 2Chron 10:16;1Tim 2:5;Rom 8:34;Heb 7:24-25 - King Rehoboam refused to listen to his subjects and they failed to see what share they had in David while, in contrast, Christ is the mediator between God and man and interceeds for his followers. 2Chron 11:16-17 - for three years the priests and levites followed the ways of David and Solomon and supported Rehoboam - this contrasts with how the religious leaders were against Christ for three years. 2Chron 11:21;1Kin 15:13 - Rehoboam's favorite bride "Maacah" [(4601) means "she has bruised" and perhaps reminds us of the wound in Gen 3:15] turned to idolatry as opposed to the favorite bride of Christ who faithfully turns to God and His Son. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2
- If the reed was (as suggested) approx 3 yards, we are looking at a square of
around 50 miles each way here - a large geographical area that is, being square,
the holy of holies (v.3) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 45:10
ye shall have ... a just bath Leviticus 19:35 45:10-12 The details contained here echo the requirements of the law. The details about the shekel and it's value match Exodus 30:13. These similarities demonstrate that Millennium temple worship will have many similarities with the Mosaic order. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.2
- If the reed was (as suggested) approx 3 yards, we are looking at a square of
around 50 miles each way here - a large geographical area that is, being square,
the holy of holies (v.3) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 45:25
The re introduction of the feast of tabernacles is seen to be a requirement in
the kingdom for Zechariah (14:16) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 45:21-22
The Passover will be re instituted. It will be offered by a mortal priest because
he will 'offer for himself'. So again a detail which highlights the truth of the
traditional Christadelphian belief that in the kingdom there will be mortal Jews. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| HOLY
GOD, HOLY LIVES
The thing that struck me from these chapters in Ezekiel was the holiness of God and our duty to be holy to him. Sometimes we think that the rigidity of life under the Law of Moses has been done away with under Christ. But Christ said that he had not come to abolish the law, but to fulfil it. During his life Jesus did not break the law, in fact, the only way he was cursed by the law was by being hung on a tree at his crucifixion. The way Jesus fulfilled the law was by looking beyond it not outside it but to its roots and the things that the law stood for. He fulfilled it by practising love, mercy justice and all the qualities the law encompassed instead of focussing on all the actions and technicalities of the law. So while we are not bound by the technicalities of the law, we are still bound by its principles and by our God who underwrites it. He is still holy. He is still the same God as he was then and the same God as he will be when these chapters come to pass. He is a holy God and we must treat him as holy and live holy and godly lives before him. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
45:25 The "fifteenth day of the seventh month" marks the beginning of the feast of tabernacles (Lev 22:33) marking another feast that will be observed in the kingdom - but we have passed the time of the day of atonement so does this indicate that there will not be a day of atonement in the kingdom calendar? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Only the Lord's portion is subdivided
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
Christ the Prince- see comments for tommorow as well. Why would Christ prepare a sin offering for himself(45:22)? We are told that the Law shall go forth from One might have problems with why he would do this in the future, having already obtained the divine nature...but as mentioned, it will be a memorial, to teach the principles of the atonement to the contemporary generation of nations. Interestingly, David himself shall also “go to the altar”(Psa 43:4)- but that’s a different story. :) Ask yourself this question. Why do we break bread now? A Memorial right? There is no power in the sacrifice itself now. Christ has already accomplished the work needed- yet we do it as a reminder of his atoning work. So memorials are no different in the Kingdom. They will be reminders. Since we have a memorial to remember Christ's death in the bread and wine, some may wonder why that just couldn't be done in the kingdom instead of the sacrifices? Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Matt |
||||||||||
Just as the Levites camped around the tabernacle in the wilderness, so in the Kingdom reign of Christ the Levites are to live around the sanctuary and the most holy place, Eze 45:4,5.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
45:4 Here we see a departure from how it was in the past. Whereas in the past the priests had cities scattered throughout the land as detailed in Josh 21 and there was no provision for them around the tabernacle in the kingdom age the priests will have specific territory close by the temple for their house. This is not to say that they will not be throughout the land as well. Just to make the point that the provision of land round the sanctuary is a new thing. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
45:18 Here and throughout the remainder of this chapter there is mention of feasts that were kept under the Law of Moses. This indicates that there is to be a reinstitution of at least something like the law of Moses, if not the Law of Moses in all its details. This will be for the mortal population living in the millennium reign of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
- Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
45:9 The warning to ‘remove violence’ seems not to have been heeded by the returning Jews for in the days of Nehemiah they had to be reproved for taking usury of their brethren – Neh 5:10 Now that was not physical violence but it violated the laws of God. We should remember that we can harm our brethren without actually touching them. We do this by not implementing the principles of the gospel in our dealings with them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 The holy portion (KJV); holy district (ESV) will measure approximately 6.2 miles (10 km) x 5.7 miles (9.2 km). V.2 The sanctuary will measure 750 feet (229 m) x 750 feet (229 m). The open space (KJV) around the sanctuary will measure 75 feet (22.8 m). V.5 The section for the Levites will measure 6.2 miles (10 km) x 2.8 miles (4.5 km). This is as long as the holy district but half as wide. V.6 A portion of the city will be set aside for people of all tribes to dwell. It will measure 6.2 miles (10 km) x 1.4 miles (2.25 km). The city portion will be as long as the Levites section but half as wide; and one-quarter as wide as the holy district. Probably a selection of candidates from all tribes will live in the city portion. Perhaps the selection will be made in somewhat a similar manner as it was in Nehemiah’s time (Neh 11:1,2). V.11 An ephah is a dry measure while the bath is a liquid measure. V.12 The shekel shall be twenty gerahs aligns with Lev 27:25. Mina comes from the Hebrew word maneh which means fixed weight.V.15 Every two-hundredth of the best and fatest sheep will be offered for sacrifices. V.18 There is no equivalent sacrifice in the Law of Moses. V.25 This is the Feast of Tabernacles. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
45:10 The ‘just balances’ contrasts Israel’s behaviour in the days of the kings when they falsified their trading – Amos 8:5– but such behaviour reflected a totally wrong attitude. In defrauding their customers they were actually robbing God. We can do likewise through saying one thing sand doing another. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.26
is a response to v.
20 and the disciples' questioning. It is in the context of the inclusion of
the gentiles. Here Jesus is preparing them for the work in the future, when he,
rejected by his own people, becomes the saviour of the whole world. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:3
Whilst John says that Jesus' feet were anointed
Matthew 26:7 says his head was anointed Mark
14:3 also says that his head was anointed We may think that these is a contradiction between John and the other two records. However John is picking on the 'fact' because he wishes to link this event with the washing of the disciples feet John 13:5. John is the only one to mention the washing of the disciples feet and so the focus is on 'feet' in chapter 12. When we notice differences between different gospel records we must look for the reason for the difference rather than just assume that one of the records is inaccurate. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:20
Whilst it is not possible to be certain which day the Greeks came to see Jesus
it seems reasonable to conclude that they - who would have been barred from going
to the temple on temple mount - sought Jesus after he had cast out the money changers
and declared, as did Isaiah (56:7)
. They saw in Jesus a man who understood their plight. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :38-40
So, as we saw in April. even though among the common people there was an expectation
the leaders did not believe. This is shown by two more quotations from the Old
Testament. 'Lord ... revealed' Isaiah 53:1 'He hath ... heal them' Isaiah 6:10 so we see a tension between the expectations of the common people and the leaders. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:19 The chanting of Psalm 118 may well have been sufficient to cause the Pharisees to think that 'the world is gone after him' but given that the next thing mentioned is the Greeks coming to Jesus which we suggest was after the cleaning of the temple (2002 comment) maybe their impotence on that occasion fueled their dismay. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.22 As fellow townsmen of Bethsaida (John 1:44), these two men seem to have been drawn to each other. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.13 The people took palm branches when meeting Jesus. Palm trees are a symbol of righteousness, which were displayed in Solomon's temple and will be displayed in the new temple in the Kingdom (1Kin 6:29; Psa 92:12; Eze 41:25,26). V. 32 draws on the bronze serpent in the wilderness which represented Christ as the healer of humanity (bronze) in overcoming sin and death (the snake) (Num 21:8,9; John 3:14,15). Vs.42.43 It is not good enough just to admit that Jesus is the Christ. A commitment to follow and obey at the expense of worldly things is necessary for salvation. Some Pharisees were not willing to do this. We ought to remind ourselves of our commitment (Matt 6:24;10:32,33;John 15:14). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
12:31 In speaking of being ;lifted up’ Jesus is making reference to John 3:14 and , 8:28 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs. 44,45 Jesus showed the Father because He was the image (representation) of God (Col 1:15). Belief in Jesus meant belief in the Father also. Clearly, this indicates a belief in two separate persons, not the confused Trinitarian notion of two parts of a tripartite God. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| v 27,28 Just as Lazarus' death & resurrection had been for the glory of God John 11:4,40, how much more Jesus'. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
12:20 The fact that ‘certain Greeks wanted to speak with Jesus must have been a comfort to him. He had just cast out the money changers and had for all of his ministry suffered persecution and rejection from the leaders. But now he sees evidence that his teaching was having an effect even further than the borders of the land of Israel. There are a number of events in the last week of the mortal life of Jesus which must have comforted him. Were they part of God’s care for His son? Did He engineer these comforts to help His son through the ordeal which ended in his death? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:26 ‘If any man serve me him will my father honour’ catches the sentiments of Prov 27:18 Prov 27:18 where Hezekiah who copied out this section of the Proverbs – Prov 25:1 - is teaching those who would be kings how they should behave. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:7 Jesus’ comment ‘the poor always ye have with you’ is not a heartless comment but a reminder of what God had already taught Israel – Deut 15:11. The point that the law taught Israel was that no matter how much they gave they would not solve the problem of poverty. The giving was for the benefit of the giver. The giver would learn about God’s generosity through his giving. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.14 Jesus asked his disciples to bring the ass with its colt (Matt 21:2). V.15 This verse fulfils the prophecy of Zech 9:9. But why did the Lord need both the donkey and her foal? Notice, from Matt 21:2, that the donkey was tied but the foal was not. (There is no need to tie a foal as it will not wander away from its mother).In the selection of the two animals, the Lord was showing Judaism and Christianity. The older animal represented Israel. Like the donkey, which was tethered, Israel was also limited, being constrained by the Law. The foal represented the new way in Christ. The limited older donkey gave birth to the unconstrained younger foal. And so the Law gave birth to the freedom in Christ. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
12:16 ‘these things understood not ...’ is an inspired comment added by John. Right through his gospel John provides explanations as to the details he writes – he expounds his own gospel as he writes it. If we wish to understand his gospel we do well to take note of his own explanations and comments embedded in it. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||