|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.17
- Far from being an over harsh approach, this was required by the law -
Deut.13:9,15
- both for the person and for the people of the evil city. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 23:4-7
These elaborate precautions to preserve the life of the young man who
was to be anointed king is an indication of the evil of Athaliah and her
power in the land at that time. 23:11 God save the king - more correctly 'let the king live' 1 Samuel 10:24 2 Samuel 16:16 2 Kings 11:12 2 Chronicles 23:11 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.6
- The parallel passage in 2Kings
11:6 tells us that it was the house of the Lord that was to be watched.
It was here the job of the people - not the priests. Everyone had a responsibility
to keep the watch of the house of the Lord. The lessons for ourselves are
clear. The action taken here is described in 1Chron.23:28-32 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 23:18
Notice that when Jehoiada revived temple worship he did it according to
the structure that David had laid down so long ago. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 23:18
In crying 'treason' Athaliah showed her true colours. She was not interested
in preserving the seed of David. Rather she had her own preferences which
related to establishing her own will. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 23:18-21 Jehoiada, the faithful priest has been planning for this time for some years. Now that Joash is of an age that he can be put on the throne the plan is implemented. We should not think of the actions spoken of here as being a quickly thought up plan. It was fraught with risks for the faithful priest. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Jehoiada must have been a remarkable man. His great age, means that he was born not long after the death of Solomon, or possibly even earlier. He had seen all that had occurred in both kingdoms, and had been a faithful servent of God, maintaining his integrity in spite of all that had happened. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
V.1 Jehoiada was a take charge kind of man. He was decisive in his actions to cleanse the present evil and turn people to Yahweh. He dispensed with the evil woman Athaliah as firmly as Jehu had dealt with her mother Jezebel. Are we decisive in our actions to overcome evil in our lives and error in our ecclesias - do we mean business? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
There are very few queens mentioned in scripture, especially as reigning over Israel or Judah. But Athaliah is there, as a terrible example.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
23:17 In these days of religious tolerance the way in which the prophets of Baal should warn us against any inclination we might have towards compromising what we believe ‘lest we offend’ others. Whereas Athaliah was not to be killed ‘in the house f the Lord’ 2Chron 23:14 no such concern was to be felt about the prophets of Baal who were killed ‘before the altars’ 2Chron 23:17. Likewise her followers were not spared ether 2Chron 23:14. Now this is not suggesting that we ride roughshod over the faith of others. But that we recognise error for what it is and have no part of it nor compromise our beliefs or practices. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
23:2 The brining of the Levites out of the cities of Judah was part of the elaborate plans to secure the throne for Joash. It was certain that there would be trouble as soon as he was made king so Jehoiada wanted as many faithful, God fearing, men together to protect the fledgling king from Athaliah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
V.15 Athaliah followed in the steps of her wicked family. She committed murder like her father Ahab, her mother Jezebel, and her grandfather Omri. All met violent ends: Omri committed suicide (1Kin 16:18); Ahab was killed in battle (1Kin 22:34-37); Jezebel was thrown to her death (2Kin 9:30-37); Athaliah was put to death by orders of Jehoiada the priest. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
223:3 Notice the people recognise that it is God who sets up kings. By making reference to ‘the sons of David’ the people are recognising the promise of 2Sam 7:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
23:1-2 Major reforms do not come about by accident. Jehoiada, in going through Judah seeking out the Levites, was building a base of faithful men. Notice also that he did not do it alone He sought the help of others –the ‘captains of hundreds’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.13 This would be in the outer court that was open to public display. Possibly, Joash stood on the bronze platform that Solomon had made (2Chron 6:13). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
|
23:6 Despite the need for care and numbers to protect the young king the requirements of the law were observed. Only the priests being allowed into the house. It is so easy to allow our own preconceptions about ‘need’ to cause us to ‘bend’ the Divine principles. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
2Chron 23:1 - in the following names perhaps is some encouragement for those serving God and the spector of God's judgment for the memorable/famous: "Azariah" [(5838) means "Jah has helped"], "Jeroham" [(3395) means "showing pity, compassionate"], "Ishmael" [(3458) means "God will hear"], "Jehohanan" [(3076) means "Jah has graced, Jah favored", "Azariah" [(5838) means "Jah has helped"], "Obed" [(5744) means "serving"], "Maaseiah" [(4641) means "work of Jah"], "Adaiah" (5718) means "Jah has adorned"], Elishaphat" [(478) means "my God has judged, God of judgment"], "Zichri" [(2147) means "memorable, famous"]. Some of the preceding was gleaned from The Story of the Bible by G.E.Mansfield, V.3,P.388. 2Chron 23:2-3;2Chron 24:1-3 - the congregation made a covenant in the house of God, the king's son shall reign, Jehoiada chose wives for Joash so the king was guided by the priest (2Chron 23:8,11) and it perhaps echoed the king-priest rule of Melchizedek and of Christ when he returns (Gen 14:18-20;Psa 110:4;Heb 7:1-3). 2Chron 23:19;Rev 21:27;Eze 44:9 - no one allowed in the Lord's temple (then or in the future) who is unclean. 2Chron 23:16,17,20,21 - symbols of sin are destroyed/slain, a covenent made to be the Lord's, the king comes down to rule, all the people of the land rejoiced - perhaps we have an echo of Christ's return and reign on the earth. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.34-37
- Here we have the mind of a repentant man. God has gone to such trouble
to win this man - shown him the whole of the future of the world, abased
him to live like a beast of the field but these final verses suggest that
it paid off in the end and that Nebuchadnezzar was persuaded to worship
God at the end of his life. It is a wonderful example of the power of God
to organise the circumstances of even the (apparently) worst characters
to bring them face to face with their chance of salvation - and this man
a Babylonian. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
4:10-18 the dream of the tree which was cut down was given to Nebuchadnezzar by God to show that He rules in the kingdom of men and that Nebuchadnezzar was in His control and not the other way round. The details of the dream draw on the tower of Babel. 4:11
reached unto heaven Genesis 11:4 This shows that Nebuchadnezzar was attempting to mimic the spirit of mankind at the time of Babel and was therefore bound to be brought low. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Further
to the comment above, notice how the whole chapter swings between Nebuchadnezzar's
recognition of God, and of his own pride.
v.29,30 show that within 12 months of the recognition of God's power,
he is back with his pride, but God will not leave this man alone - He knows
he will be convinced. We too should be delighted when God chastens us (James
1:2) because it shows that He knows that He can convince us too and
bring us to His kingdom Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
The removal of the tree is couched in language of the tower of Babel
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| TEST
OF PROSPERITY On a church notice board not far from where we live, they recently had a sign saying, "Prosperity may be more of a test of character than poverty." This was certainly the case for Nebuchadnezzar. God intervened in Nebuchadnezzar's life to humble him, but his pride came partly because of his prosperity. In his opening statement concerning the events that happened to him, Nebuchadnezzar describes the background to his humbling. He said, "I, Nebuchadnezzar, was at home in my palace, contented and prosperous." (Daniel 4 v 4) This was where his problems began - contentment and prosperity. It went to his head. Nebuchadnezzar forgot that all that he possessed had been given to him by God, and he credited himself with the glory. "Is not this the great Babylon I have built as the royal residence, by my mighty power and for the glory of my majesty?" (v 30) A poor man could never utter words like that for he has nothing to boast of. In poverty it is easier to rely on the LORD, but it is easier to sin by coveting or stealing than it is for the one who is prosperous. For the moment Nebuchadnezzar failed his test of character due to his prosperity turning into pride. Let's watch our own characters so that we do not fall into the same trap as Nebuchadnezzar, letting our prosperity become our pride. No wonder Jesus said it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven! Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel
was in captivity and Judah was to be taken captive and Jerusalem sacked
by the Babylonians. One might be forgiven for thinking that God was no longer
in control of world events. This is countered (4:17,
25, 32, 5:21) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 4:33 The period of madness that Nebuchadnezzar experienced is typical of the way in which all rulers are "mad" because they do not acknowledge the God of heaven. Whilst they might appear rational to the rest of mankind their actions, being concerned with self preservation o their country, are astray from God and, therefore, directionless. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.6 It may seem strange that Daniel was not first summoned. But it was ordered by God's providence that he should be reserved to the last, in order that the ways of man should be proved vain. God manifested His power through His servent; thus the king was stripped of all fleshly confidences John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
V.32 Yahweh chooses whon He wants to fulfil His will (Rom 9:15,16). He chose Nebuchadnezzar but the king had to be humbled and educated. Although the most powerful leader of his time, he had to learn that Yahweh governs all (v.32). Yahweh invests a lot of time and interest in us just as He did Nebuchadnezzar. We must allow Him to teach us; discipline us; mould us so that we will be accepted, by grace, into the kingdom (Rom 9:21; Heb 11:12). Perhaps we will meet up with Nebuchadnezzar in the kingdom and we can compare notes. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| MY PLEASURE After Nebuchadnezzar's sanity had been restored, he wrote the letter we have in Daniel 4. He may not have known about us when he wrote it, but it was addressed to us all the same: "King Nebuchadnezzar, To the peoples, nations and men of every language, who live in all the world: May you prosper greatly." (Dan 4:1) It is important then that we pay attention to what Nebuchadnezzar tells us in his letter. The point I would like to note at this time is what Nebuchadnezzar says in the next verse: "It is my pleasure to tell you about the miraculous signs and wonders that the Most High God has performed for me." (v.2) God was certainly active right through the life of Nebuchadnezzar. Throughout his life he learnt many lessons through God's involvement in his life, and the one he records here was a particularly painful one. But once Nebuchadnezzar understood and had learnt the lesson, he took pleasure in going about telling everyone of the miraculous ways God had worked in his life. Nebuchadnezzar wasn't alone in the fact that God had a hand in the way his life worked out. Everyone recorded in the Bible had their lives affected by him on some way, and if we look closely at our own lives we will find that he is just as involved with us. If that is the case then shouldn't it also be our pleasure to tell others about the miraculous way God has worked in our lives? If it is our pleasure, then let's go and do it. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
| We don’t know how long the king of Babylon continued to worship “The King of Heaven”, but he definitely sounded sure at the time he wrote this letter (Dan 4:37). The great lesson is that he had learnt a huge lesson, and he wrote to everyone to tell them so. That’s preaching! David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
4:1 It is God,, not Nebuchadnezzar, who is able to pronounce ‘peace be multiplied unto you’. Peter 1Pet 1:2, 2Pet 1:2 making this point to the ‘church in Babylon’ 1Pet 5:13 is possibly making this contrast for us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Dan 2:31,32,35,38,39,44,45 -- Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, was the head of gold. As Peter Cresswell previously noted (Dan 4:34-37), Nebuchadnezzar at the end of his life worshipped God. The next empire was the Medo-Persian empire where Queen Esther, Mordecai (a type of Christ?) and her people were given mercy while the adversary Haman (sin?) was destroyed (Est 7:1-6). Next empire is Alexander the Great with the Greeks/Macedonians whose wisdom was as foolishness (1Cor 1:22-23) with their many gods, etc. And finally we have the stone (1Cor 10:4; Matt 21:42-44; 1Pet 2:4-8) crushing all the earthly kingdoms when Christ returns to establish the kingdom of God on earth. Believers should try to reflect Christ in hope of sharing his glorious nature and eternal life in the Kingdom Perhaps, the metals of these three empires have significance and they are all found in the tabernacle. Gold is thought by many to refer to a tried faith or a divine character/nature and it is possible we will see Nebuchadnezzar in the kingdom as he humbled himself towards the end of his life. Silver is thought by many to refer to mercy or redemption and this could be applicable to the situation in the book of Esther -- and of course we have the association of silver with the betrayal and sacrifice of Christ which offers believers mercy and hope of eternal life. The Greeks are symbolized by bronze/brass which is thought by many to refer to the flesh (our human nature which we must try to overcome) as opposed to that which is spiritual. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
4:3 In saying that God’s kingdom is ‘from generation to generation’ Nebuchadnezzar is contrasting his kingdom which will not continue because he will die. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.16,23,25,32 The time period seven times is probably seven years, judging by the length of Nebuchadnezzar's hair described in v.33. Seven is the number of perfection. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
4:12 Daniel’s description of the tree in which all fowls could dwell draws on the language of Eze 17:23 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.27,30 One year after Nebuchadnezzar had received the interpretation of the dream, he still had not applied what he had been told. He expressed pride in his own accomplishments without recognizing that Yahweh was the author of his destiny. He had to solidly understand that Yahweh rules over all kingdoms. Also, Nebuchadnezzar had to become righteous and merciful. Thus, was started his seven-year character development. After seven years, Nebuchadnezzar had been transformed into a true servant of Yahweh (vs.34-37). We undergo the same process, if we are willing to let Yahweh shape us to become acceptable servants. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
|
4:3 the way that Nebuchadnezzar described the kingdom of God as an ‘everlasting kingdom’ reflects what he had been told by Dan 2:44 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| involvement with the affairs of the world, politics, voting and putting leaders in office - Dan 4:17;Dan 2:21;John 18:36;John 17:16;1John 4:17 (Jesus didn't get involved with temporal politics or worldly affairs); Rom 12:2;1Tim 2:1-2. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
|
MY PLEASURE All too often we resist speaking about God. Someone might laugh at us, we might lose respect, or have to explain our beliefs for them. We might lose face, have them examine our way of life, or just be really embarrassed. If this is us, then Nebuchadnezzar's letter is something for us to take note of. Nebuchadnezzar wrote an open letter to the world. It is still here for anyone who wants to read it. After his initial greeting, Nebuchadnezzar wrote this: "It is my pleasure to tell you about the miraculous signs and wonders that the Most High God has performed for me." (Dan 4:2) Nebuchadnezzar considered it a pleasure to share with everyone the things that God had done for him. I doubt he knew the intracies of temple worship, sacrifices, offerings or the promises God had made to Abraham and David, but he knew the way God had worked in his life and considered it a pleasure to share his experiences. God was much more than knowledge to Nebuchadnezzar, he was experience and had become a way of life. Nebuchadnezzar was enthusiastic about God, and I get the impression that he was a man who had learned to love God. When God becomes our love, our way of life, the source of our enthusiasm, and when we see his hand at work in our lives for good, we, like Nebuchadnezzar, will also be able to share our love, faith and experiences with others and to take pleasure in doing so. Let us always consider it a pleasure, not a chore, to share God with any who care to listen. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
V.8 Belteshazzar means favored by Bel; or Bel’s prince. Bel was the chief god of Babylon. It was the equivalent of Baal, the Phoenician god. How ironic for Daniel (God’s judge) to be called after the useless god that Yahweh opposed (Isa 46:1,2).Vs.15,23 The tree stump would be protected from damage by securing it with a ring of metal. There was every intention that new growth would emanate from the stump. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| v19 in the KJV seems strange in that Daniel seems to say that the dream is about Nechadnezzer's enemies. The NIV renders the passage diffierently in that Daniel would prefer if the dream was about Nebuchadnezzer's enemies but he knows it is not. I do not know which translation more accurately reflects the original language, the KJV could be correct if Daniel is referring the Nebuchanezzer's number one enemy - himself and his pride! On the other hand if the NIV is correct and Daniel did prefer if the dream was about Nebuchadnezzer's enemies then this perhaps shows a small lapse in Daniel's faith which makes me wonder if that is why he is given his Babylonian name in the passage. Comments and corrections invited please! Lindsay Yuile [Glasgow South Scotland (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Lindsay |
||||||||||||||||||
CHAINSAW ART One of God's favorite things to do is to make things beautiful. A quick glance at his creation will confirm this for us. Along with his beautiful creation, God works hard to develop beautiful characters. Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, was no exception. All the way through the early chapters of Daniel, we see God challenging and developing Nebuchadnezzar to refine his character in order to make him into a man of God. The last refinement of Nebuchadnezzar's character was perhaps the most radical. To remove his pride, God prescribed seven years of madness to Nebuchadnezzar "until you acknowledge that the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes." (Dan 4:25) It is interesting that it took "seven times" (v.24) or seven years for God's process to work out in the life of Nebuchadnezzar. Seven is the number of perfection. Over that seven year period, God was perfecting the character of Nebuchadnezzar. It wasn't an easy process. The vision described Nebuchadnezzar as a tree that had grown in pride. God's remedy was to cut it down, leaving the stum and roots intact. Once the chainsaw had done its work, the tree would grow back with it's flaws perfected and become a plant of beauty, the art of the God. Jesus said that we are like branches that God needs to prune in order to make us more fruitful. (John 15 v 2) But while God's chainsaw marks on us may be painful or even humilating, they will make us perfect, a person of true beauty, a work of art, fit for his kingdom. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
4:19 Daniel is renamed Belteshazzar by Nebuchadnezzar – Dan 1:7– However almost invariably he is referred to as Daniel with the explanation that his name was changed. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.44
- This idea of 'having all things common' only seems to exist here in this
original community at Jerusalem, forced, presumably, by the circumstances
of them not being at home and needing to pool their resources in order to
stay together for a while. Elsewhere it seems it was not the case. Paul
spoke quite often of the rich and the poor - 1Tim
6:17, Gal.2:10, 2Cor.8:13-15, 9:6-7, 1Cor.16:2 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2:25-32
Whilst there are those amongst the clergy who would have us believe that
the resurrection of Jesus is a mystery and something that one has to accept
by faith Peter presents a twofold argument to prove that Jesus rose form
the dead. First. A rational review of Psalm
18 shows that Jesus had to rise from the dead and second Peter was
an eye witness. Let us be confident that our Lord has been raised from the dead. It is not a matter of opinion or conjecture. It not something that we can believe if we wish. It is a proven fact. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
We appreciate that the gospel is firmly rooted in the Old Testament. It is useful to list the number of times that the Old Testament is quoted in the preaching and Ecclesial life of our first century brethren.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2:34 Whilst we might use this verse to 'prove' that men do not go to heaven when they die Peter has a different focus - that Scripture required that Jesus would go to heaven after his resurrection. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.3 "Cloven tougues like as fire" We note here that this is not a flame of fire, it was "like" fire. It was a display of the manifestation of the Holy Spirit. Other examples: Garden of Eden Gen 3:24: Moses and the burning bush Exo 3:1-6: God speaking to thr Children of Israel Deut 4:11-13: The fire at the time of Elijah 1Kin 18:38 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.4,8,9 One of the immediate effects of the Holy Spirit was that men could speak in foreign languages. The purpose of this was that the gospel could be understood and spread to many peoples. Contrast this with those who claim to be able to speak in tongues today. The gibberish and mumbo-jumbo that they utter cannot be understood and has no meaning. The gospel is not proclaimed and no one is edified. V.21 Some people claim that, upon belief in Jesus, they receive the Holy Spirit and are saved. Nothing else is required. But at this time of the great outpouring of the Holy Spirit, Peter shows those present by what means salvation might be attained (v.38). Baptism is a confession of faith after a person has received an understanding of the gospel from the whole of scripture, both Old and New Testaments. Jesus preached about Himself from the Old Testament (Luke 24:27). Philip preached Jesus to the Ethiopian Eunuch, starting from Isaiah (Acts 8:28,35). And so, just an oral assertion that Jesus is the savior is not sufficient. Neither is an adherence to the New Testament at the exclusion of the Old Testament. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
V13 Peter was to learn in time that this mocking was only a beginning of a progressive persecution which was to happen to him. The patten of unbelief and resentment because of that unbelief was as follows:
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
Two Applications of Tongues? 2:1-11 - The gifts on the day of pentecost (50 days after passover and possibly hinting at the future Jubilee) included the vs. 3,4 gift of tongues glossa (1100) which suggests a tongue and by implication a language (specifically one naturally unacquired). In vs.6 we find the mention of each hearing in his own language dialektos (1258). In vs.8 we find Galileans apparently speaking in a tongue dialektos (1258) which indicates a language or dialect apparently used to edify foreigners each listening in their own local native language apparently at the same time. In vss.9-11 we find the various languages named with vs.11 tongues (1100) depicted in a collective apparently simultaneous sense. There is no mention of an interpreter here as knowledge is being imparted and received in each recipient's own languages. Dialektos seemingly refers to the individuals (foreign or native) each listening in their own more common tongue or language while glossa seems to have the flexibility to refer to tongue or tongues and apparently has a broader application even including foreign languages not recognized by those present (except the interpreter). In 1Cor 12:10 do we have a second application of tongues? Is this a tongue not recognized by those present (except for an interpreter) but still an actual language? Here we have those with the gift of speaking in and others with the gift of interpreting tongues (1100). In Acts there was no interpreter necessary. Slightly off topic, 1Cor 13:8,13 may be suggesting a time when the gift of tongues (1100) is no longer available. In 1Cor 14:2,4,5,6,7,9,27,28 does it suggest tongues (1100) in a second application as a language not understandable to those present, not for edifying others but oneself, and that an intermediary interpreter and other limiting conditions are needed for any edification unless it is a directly spoken language(s) as in the first of application noted in Acts? It would be easier to abuse intentionally or unintentially a second application (if not type) of speaking in tongues requiring an interpreter and Paul cautioned regarding its use. Two Types of Lord 2:34-36 - David is not asended into the heavens and says the Lord Kurios (2962) said to my Lord (2962) the Greek having meanings such as supreme in authority, controller, Mr., God, Lord, Master, Sir. These same names for God and Christ could create confusion except that this is a quote from Psa 110:1 where two clearly different words for Lord are used thus making a clearer distinction between God and Christ. The first Lord (3068) is the Jewish national name for God and the second Lord adon (113) means sovereign, controller (human or divine), lord, master, or owner.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
|
I love reading this chapter and thinking about Peter and the way he inspires the crowd. The idea of this lowly fisherman getting up, addressing the crowd and finally fullfilling all that Jesus saw in him. It give us hope that we to can reach our true potential when we fully offer ourselves to our Lord. Andrew Smith [Westleigh, Leicester, UK] Comment added in 2005 reply to Andrew |
||||||||||||||||||
2:36 In speaking of Jesus and ‘Christ’ the disciples are asserting that Jesus is now the anointed one. That is Messiah as spoken of in the Old Testament Dan 9:25,26 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.2 Wind is a sign of Divine action: Look at creation "and God spake"...."and it was so". In Eze 37:9-10 we have breath upon the dead bones, which were covered, but there was no life in them. In the vision, when breathed upon, they then stood up on their feet, and became an exceeding great army. Jesus said to Nicodemus (John 3:8) " The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but can not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth so is everyone that is born of the spirit". John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
2:46‘singleness of heart’ was a characteristic of the believers in the first century. We will see evidence of this through out the early chapters of Acts. However much of the letters written in the first century was devoted to combating disunity. So we see that whilst baptism produces the initial enthusiasm for harmony as time passes the flesh reasserts it’s grip. This is so true in our lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2:17 To prophesy does not only mean to foretell the future, Its main reason is to teach. The simple act of teaching is not wholly prophesying. To prophesy is to declare those things which cannot be known by natural means. The Apostles were about to preach those things which a short while before they did not understand. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
|
V.17 The term last days is used by some people to describe the time before the return of Christ (our present time). But clearly, the scripture talks of the last days as beginning in the first century. I prefer to use the term end times to describe our present time. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
|
2:8 The miracle of the apostles speaking and being able to be understood by ‘every man in their own tongues’ differs from the gift of tongues spoken of in the letters. Whilst there is no mention of an interpreter here in Acts 2 – actually the point is made that there was no need for one as everyone heard ‘in his own tongue’ when the gift of ‘tongues was used there had to be an interpreter present - 1Cor 14:27-28 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
2:9-10 Peter was a major speaker at Pentecost. This list of places from which visitors had come to Jerusalem to keep the feat matches quite closely the list - 1Pet 1:1 – thus we see this event in Acts provides a group of individuals who became believers to whom this same apostle Peter wrote later Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Hell - part 1 of 2 [lesson 10 of 20 gleaned from "Outline of Basic Bible Teachings" by Wes Booker (for part 2 see September 1, 1Corinthians 15)] I. HELL in the Old Testament. The Old Testament word - SHEOL = the grave. This Hebrew word "sheol" is translated "grave" 31 times, "hell" 31 times, and "pit" 3 times. In Hebrew it means 'the unseen state' (Young's concordance). By following the word through every place that it occurs, it can be seen that the word should always ber translated as "grave". Jon 2:2;Ecc 9:10;Eze 32:27;Psa 16:9-10 compare with Acts 2:25-32 A. All go to sheol, or the grave, at death - Psa 49:12-14;Psa 89:47-48;Gen 37:34-35 (Jacob);Isa 38:10 (Hezekiah) B. Sheol can receive parts of the body and other inanimate objects - Gen 37:35;42:38;Psa 141:7;Isa 14:11,15;Jon 2:2;Num 16:29-33;Eze 32:27 C. In sheol there is complete unconsciousness and inactivity - Psa 6:4-5;31:17;Isa 38:18-19;Ecc 9:10;Job 14:11-13 Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
V.13 New wine is more correctly sweet wine. The phrase is translated from the Greek word gleucus which refers to the sweet substance that is distilled from the grape before it is pressed. This results in a very strong, sweet wine. The substance gleucus is better known in English as glucose. V.15 The third hour was 9 a.m., and was the time for prayer. And so, Jews would not be eating or drinking at that time. V.20 This verse echoes Jesus’ words (Matt 24:29). The heavenly bodies represent the civil and religious authorities. The notable day (period of time) of the Lord (KJV) has a double reference. First, it talks about the fall of Jerusalem which happened in 70 AD, about seven years after the writing of Acts. Second, it is talking about the day that Jesus returns to earth from heaven. That will be a turbulent time as Jesus puts down all civil and religious authority on the earth and establishes His kingdom. V.34 David was a man after mine (Yahweh's) own heart which shall fulfil all my will (1Sam 13:4; Acts 13:22). It is interesting to note that this faithful man did not go to heaven at death. This false pagan notion, of the reward of the faithful going to heaven, is espoused by most Christian churches today.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
2:24 Being ‘loosed from the pains of death’ echoes David’s hope as voiced in Psa 18:3-4 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||