November 12

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Ezra  8
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Ezra 8 online in the King James Version
Listen to Ezra 8 online in the New International Version

 

v.17,20 - The Nethinims, is seems, (mentioned here and also in 2:43,58,70, 7:7, 8:17,20, 1Chr.9:2, Neh.3:26,31, 7:46,60,73, 10:28, 11:3,21 ), were a type of temple slave that were assigned to be of help to the Levites.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
Up to the end of chapter 7 the record was not written by Ezra. It speaks in the third person about Ezra - 'this Ezra' Ezra 7:8 but now as the account is in the first person 'me' Ezra 8:1 so we can conclude that Ezra wrote down the things that we read from this point.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 17 - Iddo, it appears, was the grandfather of the prophet Zechariah, being the father of Berechiah
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
8:22 The way that Ezra speaks of his thinking about the provision of a guard for him is instructive. Because he had already said that God was working for them and the work of going up to Jerusalem was of God he did not want to avail himself of the worldly help offered. Ezra truly trusted his God. Where do we stand on such issues?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
8:35  Whilst we might think that the 'important' individuals who had gone to Jerusalem - for example Ezra - would have been the ones who made the offerings. However we note it was the children of those who had been taken captivity. It must have been a great encouragement to these men and women to be able to sacrifice in a place that they had only ever heard of up to this time.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

8:28  In reminding the priests that they were holy to the Lord Ezra is emphasising the need for integrity. These men had entrusted to them large amounts of precious metals. Ezra was concerned that the men would be honest in their dealings. Holiness is the guard against sin.

Do we see our holiness as a reason for being totally honest or do we not even think about the fact that we are holy and should behave as such (1Pet 1:15-16)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

There’s a wonderfully human insight into Ezra’s character in Ezra 8:21-23. This is the sort of description that helps us to realise that these great Godly men of the Old Testament were ever so much like us.  Ezra had been offered soldiers and horsemen to accompany him, but had refused the king’s offer  -  why? Because he had already told the king that God would protect him. Ezra, unlike Cromwell, didn’t pray and still keep his powder dry. Ezra refused the powder!

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

 

Vs.21-23 The road from Babylon to Jerusalem was dangerous, being occupied by bandits.  Because Ezra had made a statement of faith concerning Yahweh, he felt it would be inconsistent to ask the king for protection on the journey. (Later, it appears that Nehemiah had no such conflict of faith (Neh 2:9)). 

And so, Ezra petitioned Yahweh for a safe journey and Yahweh listened.  Then he divided the treasures between 24 men and recorded each one's portion (vs.24-30,34).  Each man was responsible for just over one ton of material. 

Dividing the material among 24 men was, of course, to share the burden.  But it was also precautionary to divide the goods on such a perilous journey given that they were unguarded and going through bandit territory. 

There appears to be a lesson here.  Although we put our trust in Yahweh and ask Him for help, we have the obligation to do everything reasonable to prepare ourselves for an event (Prov 16:3,9).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

8:18  Ezra is ready to acknowledge that the things that benefited them were ‘of God’ saying ‘by the good hand of our God …’. How often do we think that when things work out well for us that the event is a consequence of our own skill?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

8:23  Having declined support from ‘the world’ Ezra does not presume support from his God. So he and those with him prayed and fasted before leaving on their four month journey.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
8:33-34 It would appear that after the long, hard journey to Jerusalem, that the first three days after their arrival were spent resting. It was not until the fourth day that the treasures were weighed, and in turn handed over to the custody of the officiating preists of the temple.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

8:21 Ezra saw the whole of his ambitions towards going to the land of Israel was of God – so he did not feel it appropriate to ask for a military escort. However he does not just leave it at that. He involves those who are to go with him in supplication to God for a safe journey.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

8:23 So the journey prospered and they arrived safely in the land. So Ezra now recognises that God had delivered them. It is so easy, when a prayer has been answered, to forget that we asked the prayer and that God has been entreated of us.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.15 Ezra could not persuade the Levites to join him in the venture to Jerusalem.

V.17 Ezra’s appeal to Iddo persuaded 38 Levites and 220 Nethinims to join the returnees at the Ahava camp.

The Nethinims were the descendants of the Gibeonites (Josh 9:3 etc.) They were now general helpers around the temple.

Vs.21-23 Ezra put himself and his fellow travelers in the hands of Yahweh for safe passage to Jerusalem. He had rejected worldly protection. His faith should be an example and encouragement for us (Psa 118:8,9).

V.24 etc. Ezra distributed the very rich cargo amongst the priests and Levites. Each one was responsible for his portion that would be checked in Jerusalem.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

8:15 It might have been thought that it did not matter who returned to help in a building project. However this was no ordinary building project. It was the house of God. Therefore people skilled in the Law of Moses had to be involved. Likewise in our building the house of God it has to be built according to the Divine instructions given in His word. If we ignore His instructions or seek advice from others not ‘in Christ’ we run the risk of building inappropriately


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

Ezra 8:15 - "abode we in tents" [Heb. "chanah" (2583) means "to decline, to incline, encamp, bend down, lie, rest in a tent, grow to an end"] three days;  Ezra 8:32 - "...came to Jerusalem and abode there three days..." (could these two verses be echos of Christ's being in the tomb three days?).

Ezra 8:28 - "...the vessels" [Heb. "keliy" (3627) means "something prepared, any apparatus, vessel, etc."]  are holy also; and the silver and gold are a free will offering..." [is the vessel not unlike how Christ and/or his followers were prepared as saints and how Christ was redeemed from sin (i.e. silver) and refined his faith to perfection (i.e. gold) before freely offering his life?].

Ezra 8:31 - "...he delivered us from the hand of the enemy..." (is this possibly an echo of the sacrificial provision of deliverance from sin and death?).

Ezra 8:35 - "...the children...which were come out of the captivity, offered burnt offerings..." (perhaps an echo of coming out of captivity to sin and death through Christ's sacrificial offering).

Ezra 8:33 - "...was the silver and the gold and the vessels weighed in the house of our God by the hand of Meremoth..." ["weighed" Heb. "shaqal" (8254) means "suspend, pay, receive, weigh", etc.], ["Meremoth" (4822) means "heights, elevations" and is derived from Heb. "rum" (7311) meaning "to be high, to rise or raise (literally or figuratively), to exalt, holdup, lift", etc.].


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Hosea 9
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Hosea 9 online in the King James Version
Listen to Hosea 9 online in the New International Version

 

v.4 mourners - the Hebrew is 0205 aven . It is normally translated wicked, vanity, mischief etc. The root word means to pant from exertion which has no gain.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

9:7 visitation Luke 21:22
9:9 as in the day of Gibeah Judges 19:22
9:10 went to Baal-Peor Numbers 25:3
9:12 Though they bring ... bereave them Deuteronomy 28:41
9:17 wanderers among the nations Deuteronomy 28:64
9:3 'eat unclean things in Assyria' 2 Kings 17:3 - 6 Hoshea was taken to Assyria.

9:10 - 15 Baal-Peor refers to the events of Baalam in Numbers 25. These events took place in the plains of Moab at Shittim before Israel passed over Jordan to Gilgal. The mention of Baal-Peor in v10 and Gilgal in v15 catches the events of the time. Like 'remember from Shittim to Gilgal' Micah 6:5 where Micah who was a contemporary prophet with Hosea makes the same point.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.8 - It would be easy to conclude, as indeed some do, that Israel have no part left to play in God's purpose. If it were left to passages like this we would believe that, but the watchmen of Ephraim will have their day, as shown in Jer.31:6 , which will lead to the possibility of their forgiveness and their place in God's kingdom.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
9:10 That Israel was found as 'the first ripe in the fig tree' is rather like the way that Jesus came to the fig tree ( Matthew 21:19 ) looking for fruit. The nation should always have been bringing forth fruit - not just once a year. The fathers had done so - Abraham Isaac and Jacob ( your fathers :10 ).
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
The repeated use of the language of Deuteronomy 28 - see above - was designed to highlight the reason for Israel's captivity. The had turned away from God and were consequently suffering the curses that they had accepted. The fact that they had separated themselves from Judah in the days of Jeroboam did not make them immune to the judgements of God.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Hos 9:1. Here the Children of Israel are told to rejoice not, but in the law rejoicing was a part of their activities, at the times of the feasts. (DEUT.16) At this point of time they have fallen to such a degree that there was nothing to rejoice about, nothing to be happy about, they have left their God, and they shall not at this time dwell in the Lord’s land. 

Hos 9:7. It is interesting to note that prophets are now added to the people, priests and the king, which we read the other day in 5:1


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John
9:9 'The day of Gibeah' refers to the events of Judg 19 when the Benjamites of Gibeah behaved abominably to the Levite's concubine and then were unrepentant.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
OBEDIENCE
 
Hosea said of Israel, "My God will reject them because they have not obeyed him, they will be wanderers among the nations." (Hos 9:17)  Hosea could have said a number of different things.  He could have said that God rejected them because they had not loved him, trusted him, worshipped him or believed him.  All those descriptions would have been right, but he chose to speak of their lack of obedience.
 
Obedience is the outward sign of loving, trusting, worshipping and believing God.  Trust is difficult to see unless that trust is put to the test in action.  Love is shown in its actions.  Worship is shown in the things we choose to do, and belief is shown through faith in action.  Obedience is the key. 
 
Jesus said, "Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me." (John 14:21)  Obviously the same lesson applies to us as was given to Israel.  Our love for our Lord is shown in our obedience.  It is no use just saying we are followers of Christ without bothering to do what he wants us to do, or even to find out how we can be obedient.  Jesus' instructions are in the Bible.  In order for us to show our love to him, we need to read the Bible, find out how he wants us to behave, and live in obedience to him.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Robert


 God rejoiced in Israel. They were His people. He describes them in today’s chapter as “Grapes in the wilderness” (Hos 9:10). You don’t find grapes in the wilderness – so unusual and welcome were Israel to God.  The rest of the nations were not interested in the Lord God, and so He looked to His people to give Him love and honour. But His people turned their back on Him. It hurt the Lord, greatly.
 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

9:9 ‘The day of Gibeah’ refers to the events of Judg 19 when the Benjamites of Gibeah behaved abominably to the Levite’s concubine and then were unrepentant.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

9:12 In saying that Israel will be bereaved of her children shows that God will keep His word which He had spoken – Deut 28:12


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

V.1 The reference to the corn floor (KJV); threshing floors (ESV) is significant as a place of worship.  Here, Israel had been given over to prostitution. 

Prostitution is often synonymous with idolatry in Biblical language.  The mention of Israel's worship of Baal-peor confirms this (v.10).  Baal-peor was a Moabite god whose worship included illicit sexual practices.  The link between prostitution and idolatry is clear in this case. 

The threshing floor was a wide open place where this kind of worship could be undertaken en masse.  By contrast, the threshing floor of Araunah (Onan) the Jebusite was purchased by David to build an altar to Yahweh (2Sam 24:18-25).  The temple was later built on this spot (traditionally Mount Moriah, were Abraham attempted to sacrifice Isaac (Gen 22:2)).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

9:3 The prophet is speaking of the captivity of Samaria which took place in the end of Hoshea’s reign – hence the mention of Assyria. The use of ‘Egypt’ is to remind them of the words of the curse in Deut 28:68


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

9:15 In saying ‘I will drive them out of mine house’ the prophet is firstly speaking of the Babylonian captivity of Judah and then of the destruction of the temple in AD 70.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

IF TRUTH HURTS...

 

Truth often hurts. It makes us feel uncomfortable, inadequate and guilty. We want to live our own comfortable, non-confrontational lives, doing our own thing in the way we want to do it, but when the honest truth is pointed out, we are not really as strong or as good as we think we are.

 

God always sent messengers to his people to tell them the truth. Most often they were needed to tell the people to change their ways and to turn back to God, but of course this message didn't always go down too well. We read of Israel's reactions to those that brought the messages in these words: "Because your sins are so many and your hostility so great, the prophet is considered a fool, the inspired man a maniac. The prophet, along with my God, is the watchman over Ephraim, yet snares await him on all his paths, and hostility in the house of his God." (Hos 9:7-8)

 

The people of Israel hated the message so much that they insisted the prophets were out of their minds (that way they wouldn't have to listen to them). As well as labeling these men as mentally unstable, they constantly tried to trap them, trip them up, and make life a difficult as possible for them.

 

Let us by no means do the same to those who speak the truith to us - even if we feel uncomfortable, inadequate or guilty because of what they say. If those feelings come, it is us that needs to change.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

 

V.3 The expression Ephraim shall return to Egypt is figurative. Israel would return to the state of bondage that it experienced in Egypt. The overlords in this case would be the Assyrians.

V.4 The bread of mourners is an allusion to uncleanness under the Law (Deut 26:14; Eze 24:17). Israel was spiritually dead and therefore unclean.

V.6 Some people from Israel fled from the Assyrians to Egypt. But, Egypt would not be a safe haven for them.

V.8 The watchman is Yahweh’s true prophet; but the prophet (KJV) represents the false prophet who trapped Israel into idolatry.

V.9 Gibeah is a reference to the incidence in Judges where the sons of Belial tried to force their illicit sexual acts on the visiting stranger (Judg 19:16 etc.).

V.10 Baal-peor (ESV) was the god of Moab. Sexual acts were performed in the worship of this god.

V.13 Tyre held the admiration of all in the region for its beauty, wealth, and power. Israel is likened to Tyre, but destruction would be its end.

V.15 Saul was made king in Gilgal (1Sam 11:14,15). This act was a rejection of Yahweh as Israel’s God (1Sam 8:7).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
The whole of this chapter uses a fruit on a tree as a simile of Israel. Their unwillingness to give God the rewards of His labours on them is described in v16 "their root is dried up; they shall bear no fruit". If you add to this the name of the tree mentioned in v10, which new testament incident can you think of? The result of v17 is the warning that this new testament person was trying to convey with that incident.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

9:1 ‘Rejoice not’ indicates that Israel was revelling in their idol worship. False worship is appealing, else people would not do it. Heb 11:25 indicates that God realises that sin is pleasurable – we are foolish if we do not acknowledge this. Though the fact that we enjoy it is not a sufficient reason to do it. It just explains why we find it so appealing


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Acts  28
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Acts 28 online in the King James Version
Listen to Acts 28 online in the New International Version

 

v. 6 - The word for god ( 2316 theos ) was used in Greek parlance not just of deities, but also of dignitaries - kings, magistrates, judges etc. To refer exclusively to the one true God, the word 3588 - ho - was attached. That word is not present here.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

28:1 The island of 'Melita' is actually now called Malta. There is no New Testament indication of an ecclesia being formed there as a consequence of Paul's short stay there.

28:21-22 It may seem surprising that the Jews in Rome had heard about the Christians but had not heard about Paul's position, even though he was on hi way to Rome as a consequence of arguments with the religious leaders in Jerusalem. Maybe those in Jerusalem did not think that Paul was going to be a problem again after he had been taken as a Roman prisoner and so did not bother to send messages to them in Rome.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
28:31 And so to the end - Paul is preaching the kingdom of God. We should take heed to this. The message is simple. It started with the disciples asking Jesus ( 1:8 ) about the restoration to Israel of the kingdom. Acts end with Paul preaching the same thing. The message does not change --we should not try to embellish it.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:17-27 And so again we see the prime objective in Paul's life is to preach the gospel.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
28:29 Away from Jerusalem, the spiritual centre of Judaism, it is likely that the Jews were more willing to listen to the reasoning of Paul about Christ. Maybe this is hinted at when we read 'the Jews departed and had great reasoning'
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.17 Paul had not spoken against the Mosaic ritual. Such ritual had automatically fallen away in Christ. There now was no need for an alter, when Christ our alter was here. There was no need for a priest, now that our High Priest had come. There was no need for the sacrifices, now that Jesus had made the perfect sacrifice. All these things were not Paul's doing. They were all in the Plan and Purpose of God.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

28:4-9 We are shown a contrast between the two ways people could have viewed Paul On the one had there was superstition and on the other hand faith in God. The outcome of the healing was that others came to be healed showing that the gospel prevailed over superstition.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
V.18 The apostle was not a criminal as the other prisoners were. He had come to Rome to be tried. He had come to be heard, and to be exonerated. He was not even accusing Israel, on the contrary, he had addressed them as brethren, thus identifying himself as an Israelite. They had attacked them. He was not attacking them.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

28:20‘The hope of Israel’ is one major strand of the gospel message. So in verse :23 he speaks of Jesus and the kingdom using the Old Testament highlighting that the hope of Israel is central to the gospel message.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

V.29 is not found in some manuscripts.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

28:15 Notice the ‘brethren’, not being deterred by the fact that Paul was a prisoner, went to meet with him. Probably not even knowing whether the centurion would allow the visit. Heir concern was fellowship. How often do we put ourselves out to seek fellowship?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.11 Castor and Pollux (KJV) were heroes in Greek and Roman Mythology.  They were the twin sons of Jupiter.  The constellation Gemini was the heavenly representation of them.  They were either painted, or were carved as figures, on the prow of ships because they were considered as divine agents for the protection of sailors.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

28:6 The way men think! God had been at work in the saving of Paul from the venomous best but the people would rather ascribe the work to a false god. Such is human nature. It is unwilling to see the clear evidence of the existence of God and His work.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.1 Melita is present-day Malta.

V.3 Vipers can rush at a perceived enemy. They are highly venomous. Viperid venoms typically contain an abundance of protein-degrading enzymes, called proteases, that produce symptoms such as pain, strong local swelling and necrosis, blood loss from cardiovascular damage complicated by coagulopathy, and disruption of the blood clotting system. Death is usually caused by collapse in blood pressure (Wikipedia).

V.6 The locals were quite familiar with viper bites: to swell up or suddenly fall down dead (ESV).

Today, there are no vipers on Malta.

V.16 Paul arrived in Rome 60-61 AD. He was under house arrest for two years. Under Roman law, if any accusations against a prisoner went unsubstantiated after two years, the prisoner would be freed. In Paul's case, that meant he was probably freed in 62-63 AD.

Nero was the emperor at this time (54-68 AD). He was a cruel, despotic ruler. Nero had his mother murdered to shift suspicion away from his involvement in the death of his half-brother. He was a homosexual who engaged in much debauchery and excess.

There was a great fire in Rome in 64 AD. To deflect suspicion that he had caused it, Nero accused the Christians of starting the fire. He then set about a campaign of great persecution towards Christians. Although it is not certain what happened to Paul, it is probable that he was executed during this time.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

28:8 The healing of Publius’ father by Paul is the second witness that God was working through him. The first being his deliverance from the poisonous beast.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter