|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 1
v. 7 - Here again, as we saw a day or two ago with Ezra, Nehemiah associates
himself with the sin of the people, even though the outward signs were not
there. It is important to realise that these worthy and Godly men without
exception recognised their own sinfulness. It is an essential requirement
of the contrite and humble spirit that God demands. Psa.34:18,
51:17, Isa.57:15, 66:2 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch.1 Fourteen years after the return of Ezra to Jerusalem, Nehemiah led up a company and restored the walls and the civil authority. Of those events this book is the record. It is in eight divisions: 1 The
journey to Jerusalem,
1.1-2.20 The prophecy
of Malachi was spoken at this time. 2:2
Nehemiah's fear was a consequence of the fact that Artaxerxes could have
had Nehemiah killed. No one was supposed to look sad in the presence of
the king. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2
v.4 - How often, when faced with a need to question an authority in
the world do we have the presence of mind, as Nehemiah did here, to pray
first? It seems that this prayer was a short and instant thing between two
parts of the same conversation. We are not told whether he made a public
outward indication of what he was doing or not. We know he did it because
he is the author of the book. I suggest that in the circumstances this fact
was not know to any around him, but was an important part of his principle
of belief and worship, that God was consulted at every point. Much for us
to learn here. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The links with Daniel's prayer
Show two men with the same concern. Daniel before the restoration and Nehemiah when he sees that the return has begun. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| THEN
I PRAYED TO THE GOD OF HEAVEN Nehemiah was standing before the king of Persia, the most powerful man in the world. He was discussing with him the state of Jerusalem. Then the King asked, "What is it you want?" We read, "Then I prayed to the God of heaven, and I answered the King " That prayer took place in a matter of seconds between a question and a reply during a conversation between Nehemiah and the king. He had no time to phrase and speak a formal prayer and he did in chapter 1. The king could have gotten worried if he had suddenly dropped to his knees to pray, or raised his hands in the air, or stood with his eyes closed for five minutes. No, this was a spontaneous quick prayer between Nehemiah and God that took no time at all. We are not told what his prayer was about, but I would guess that it was a prayer of thanks, guidance, wisdom and for God to move in the heart of the king. Nehemiah's prayer was an instant reaction to a tricky situation and God answered his prayer. Spontaneous prayer was an important part of Nehemiah's life. It is an important part of my life. Make it an important part of your life too. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
ch 1 - Nehemiah highlights the fact that the nation have been in captivity because they forsook the law of God and the covenant they made just before they entered the land under Joshua with quotations from the blessings and cursing. 2:17 That because Jerusalem was laid waste and become a 'reproach' catches the lament of Daniel 9:16. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| JUST
DO IT The city of Jerusalem lay in ruins. The wall and the gates had been broken down. At the time there were a large number of Jews living in Jerusalem. They must have noticed the state of the city but the motivation to get to work and repair it was not there - that is, until Nehemiah came along and opened their eyes once again to the trouble they were in. Nehemiah said to them, "You see the trouble we are in: Jerusalem lies in ruins, and its gates have been burnt with fire. Come let us rebuild the wall of Jerusalem, and we will no longer be in disgrace." (v 17) With this motivation behind them, the people's reply was positive: "Let us start rebuilding." (v 18) From before Nehemiah arrived in Jerusalem until this moment, whether he was there or not, the problem remained the same: the city was in ruins. It took Nehemiah to point out the problem before they began to work. Do we do the same? Are we waiting for the motivation to preach the word, to tidy the church, to study the Bible, to reach out to fill a particular need? Let's not wait for Nehemiah. He might be a long time in coming. Instead let's do it. Let's become the Nehemiah we are waiting for, and get stuck in to fix the trouble and repair the ruins. With the right motivation - probably just leadership - others will join us. So let's not wait around putting up with trouble. Get stuck in. Just do it! Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
NEH. 1: The amount of quotations we find in this prayer are amazing. Neh 1:11. The cupbearer was a position of honor. It would have been a trusted position, since the cupbearer would be the last person to handle the king’s wine. (The possibility of it being poisoned was always there) It is indicative of Nehemiah’s character that a Jew should have such a position. Why were the Persians given this position of honor? John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||
1:6-7 Notice that whilst the prayer is Nehemiah's he identifies himself with the nation who had sinned. 2:4 Whilst we may think that Nehemiah prayed at the time he stood before the king we should appreciate that, as can be seen from chapter 1, he had been praying for some time abut the situation in Jerusalem. The desire to return to Jerusalem was not a spur of the moment idea with Nehemiah. It was the driving force in his life and motivated his prayer life all the time. So the question of the king was not a spur to instant prayer. Rather it was a God given situation in response to his prayer. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Nehemiah’s prayer in Neh 2:4 isn’t the sudden, spur-of-the-moment prayer that we sometimes think. Chapter 1 is 4 months before chapter 2; and the prayer in Neh 1:5-11 is 7 verses long. So Nehemiah had quite a long time to prepare himself, and to place his supplications before the Lord. Then, one that one day when he just couldn’t force a smile on to his lips, he prayed another, very quick prayer, while he stood in front of the king. God heard both – the long and the short. And Nehemiah was allowed to journey to Jeruslaem. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
This could be a stretch but here we have a list of events/verses, not totally in order, that reminded me of Christ and his sacrifice etc.: 2:1 - he provided the cup of wine. 2:6 - it pleased the king to send him though he awaited his return. 2:7 - he encountered a river on the way to his journey. 2:8 - the mention of wooden beams for the gates and temple. 2:11-12 - he came to Jerusalem, three days, set out during the night, with a few men, was on a mount. 2:14 - he went through a fountain of water (strengthened by and quoting the word) before a pool of water (washed away sins/buried). 2:15 - returned from a valley gate (returned from the pit). 2:16 - he was quiet before the nobles and priests and the rulers didn't know what he did or where he went. 2:17-18 - he took away the reproach (sin) of the people and helped them to rebuild the wall (Christ was the chief corner stone) which was a good work. 2:19 - mocked and accused of rebelling against the king. 2:20 - only his servants will have an inheritance in Jerusalem. 3:1 - mention of a sheep gate with doors rebuilt by Eliashib (475) meaning God will restore. 3:3 - mention of a fish gate with its wooden beams and metal attachments rebuilt by the sons of Hassenaah (5574) which means pointed and perhaps echos a suggestion of the nails that shed Christ's blood on the wooden cross. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| 2:8 Already Nehemiah is planning and arranging his work. Repeatedly, Nehemiah teaches the lesson of the need for prayerful and wise preparation. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
The books of Ezra and Nehemiah were originally one book. It is uncertain whether the author of the book(s) is Ezra or Nehemiah. In any event, Nehemiah here makes his first visit to Jerusalem in 445 BC. His second visit was in 432 BC. Nehemiah was contemporary with Malachi the prophet and with Socrates the Greek philosopher. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:9 Nehemiah’s prayer draws on a number of old Testament passages, but in particular his quotation of Deut 29:4 shows he appreciated that he could indeed pray to God knowing that he would be heard. 2:6 When Nehemiah was asked how long he would be in Jerusalem the time he seems to have set was 12 years because he was there for 12 years – Neh 5:12
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:11 In saying ‘desire to fear thy name’ Nehemiah, in his prayer, is echoing the earlier sentiments of the prophet Isa 26:8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:11 Nehemiah was a cupbearer for Artaxerxes Longimanus. A cupbearer not only served the king his wine, but he was responsible for its safety. Assassins would welcome the opportunity to administer poison to a king through his wine, if they could. Thus, the position of a cupbearer in the Near-East was one of great trust. And so, it was not unusual for cupbearers to become confidants of, and advisors to, their monarchs. Other notable Bible cupbearers were: the chief butler in Joseph's experience (Gen 40:2); Rabshakeh, the spokesman for Sennacherib during Hezekiah's time (2Kin 18:17-37). Rabshakeh is an Assyrian title for chief cupbearer. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
MOTIVATION
In all the Bible, Nehemiah was possibly one of the greatest motivators. Under his direction people from all walks of life came together under extreme opposition to do heavy manual work and build a wall around Jerusalem in record time. Nehemiah's initial plea to the people that resulted in their commitment to the task should take our attention.
Let us also motivate others in the service of the Lord. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
1:5 Nehemiah, in his prayer, quotes Deut 7:9indicating that he feels able to speak to God in this way because he already knows what his God is like. Do we feel we know our God through our reading of Scripture? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Nehemiah means comforted by Yah. 1:1 The month Kislev equates to November/December; while the month Nisan equates to March/April (2:1). The twentieth year (of Artaxerxes) was 445 BC. One might wonder why the king, Artaxerxes Longimanus, elevated Nehemiah to a valued post of trust, and why he was so kindly disposed to him. It comes as no surprise when it is realized that the king’s father was Xerxes - or as the Hebrews knew him, Ahasuerus III. He was the king involved with Esther. And, it was Esther who laid the groundwork for subsequent favor toward the Jews. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:5 Nehemiah’s request to ‘build’ Jerusalem might seem a wild expectation. However Nehemiah would have known the prophets and been aware of the fact that Jeremiah had prophesied that Israel would return to the land after 70 years –Jer 25:11-12 - so doubtless he saw this as a God given opportunity and so made his request. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Neh 2:12-15 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment 6. The Jews were taken into captivity in Babylon 2Kin 24, 2Kin 25 to last for 70 years. (Prophesied Jer 25:8,12) 2Chron 36:20-21. Jerusalem was desolate. Neh 2:12-15. Go to Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
1:1 Although not certain, Nehemiah was probably of the tribe of Judah. The Nehemiah of Ezra 2:2 is probably not the same as this Nehemiah. Shushan, sometimes called Susa, was the capital of Elam. 1:2,3 The consternation of the Jewish returnees was that the wall of Jerusalem was broken down. Those who went before Nehemiah, namely Zerubbabel and Ezra, were concerned only with the restoration of the temple. The broken walls constituted vulnerability in the defence of the city. Added to that, there must have been a concern about the houses in Jerusalem that were completely destroyed. Houses needed to be built if Jerusalem was to accommodate the returning captives. 1:4 etc. Nehemiah had been made aware of the poor state of infrastructure in Jerusalem. His concern led him to make a petition to Yahweh. 2:1 This is now about four months after Nehemiah had heard the complaints about Jerusalem, and made his petition to Yahweh. The wonder is, why didn’t Nehemiah speak to the king about his concerns before now? We do not know, but perhaps it was protocol that the cupbearer could only react to the king and not petition him directly. Recall Xerxes’ protocol that affected Esther (Est 4:11; 5:2). There the king decided which petitioner to accept or reject. 2:6 Here, the word queen comes from the Hebrew shegal which describes a woman (concubine or harlot) who is favored by the king.But, a queen, who is a reigning monarch, is termed malkah in Hebrew (e.g. the Queen of Sheba 1Kin 10:1). Also, a woman who marries a king to become a legitimate queen, like Esther, who became Xerxes' queen, is also termed malkah (Est 2:22).2:10,19 Sanballat was a Moabite; Tobiah was an Ammonite; Geshem was an Arab. These were traditional enemies of the Jews. These men would prove to be challenging to Nehemiah and his re-building program. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:3 Nehemiah’s attitude was not simply that he was sad that Jerusalem was wasted and spoiled. He was amongst those who ‘mourned for Zion’ Isa 61:1-3 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Neh 1:1 - "Nehemiah" [(5166) means "consolation of Jah, Jah comforts"]. Neh 1:2 - "Hananai" [(2607) means "gracious" - believers are saved through grace (Eph 2:8-9)]. Neh 1:11 - Nehemiah was a cupbearer and Christ bore the cup also (Matt 20:22-23;Matt 26:39,42). Neh 2:1-2 - took the wine and was sad not unlike Christ who took the wine and yielded to his Father's will with sadness including sadness of what would become of Jerusalem (Matt 26:38-39;Luke 23:28). Like Christ, Nehemiah was also a governor who lightened burdens (Neh 5:14-15;Matt 11:30). Neh 1:8 - scattered if unfaithful (Lev 26:33). Neh 1:9 - regathered (Deut 30:4). Neh 2:17 - this may remind us Christ will rebuild Jerusalem when he returns to establish his Father's kingdom; believers need to turn to Christ and be joined with him (the bride/body of believers joined as one to the bridegroom/Christ - John 17:21-23) for protection, then they will not be in disgrace on the day of judgment; "wall" [Heb. "chomah" (2346) means "to join, a wall of protection, wall, walled"], "Jerusalem" [(3389) means "teaching of peace, founded peaceful"]. Neh 2:19-20 - false accusers seeking to ensnare (Mark 12:14-17), those who aren't pure will have no share in God's kingdom on earth (James 1:7-8;Matt 6:24); V.19 - a plate bearing the name of "Geshem the Arab" was found in 1947 about 12 miles from Ismailia, Egypt dating to circa the 5th century BC. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.1
- The sense of this verse is that of glory before men. The 'feeding on wind'
speaks surely of the vanity of Ephraim for himself, where the covenant with
Assyria is clearly a union condemned by God. The carrying of oil to Egypt
is by way of gift - presumably, if left unchecked, in readiness for the
next covenant with man. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:1
covenant with the Assyrians 2 Kings 17:3 12:7 'Yet I am become rich, I have found me out great substance' is here a claim made by idolatrous Israel. Jesus' use of the same language in Revelation 3:17 is a very powerful condemnation of the brethren and sisters in Laodicea. It marks a state of mind which demonstrates complacent arrogance. Whilst it might seem difficult to see such an attitude in our brethren [at Laodicea] and today clearly it is possible. Such an attitude is marked by a total lack of awareness of one's spiritual depravity. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.6
tells us that we should use the example of Jacob, who in the strength of
God prevailed over the angel, but found his forgiveness there at Bethel,
the house of God, and there built his memorial. It is a wonderful picture
of the way in which, in prevaling on our behalf, Jesus has built for us
an everlasting memorial on which we can trust. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:9-10
Yahweh is at pains to remind Israel what He has done for them. Nor is it
the case that they could not know. He had sent many prophets. As we have
already noted, at this time there were a number of prophets speaking whose
record we have. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:3,4
In citing two incidents from the life of Jacob - his birth and his battle
with the angel God is highlighting the strength of Jacob with God which
is now contrasted with their waywardness (see
12:6). That 'He spake with us' marks the point that these incidents
in Jacob's life were not just for his own benefit. Their being recorded
indicated that all Israel should benefit from thinking about them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:1 The 'covenant with the Assyrians is a reference to 2Kin 17:3 and continues the things we saw in Hos 10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.6 He who wished to be a true descendant of Jacob was to turn (return) to his God and manifest true repentance by keeping "mercy and justice" Mic 6:8 embracing the commandments regarding ones duty towards one's neighbor, the most visible witness of the sincerity of one's repentance John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
It’s not often that Jacob’s life is used as an illustration, rather than Abraham’s, but it is here in Hos 12:3-6. Jacob triumphed over his brother Esau at birth, (Gen 25:26), and was later given the name Israel, or “A Prince With God”, as in Gen 32:28. It’s interesting that in these 4 verses there is no mention of Jacob acquiring the birthright or the blessing. Perhaps we can say that they are earthly things which Jacob sought for himself, and things which actually did not affect how God dealt with him.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
12:1 The ‘covenant with the Assyrians is a reference to 2Kin 17:3 and continues the things we saw in Hos 10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.4 We have a wonderful lesson in the incident of the angel wrestling Jacob. God's ways are different than the ways of man. In human ways the angel throws Jacob down, he does what one would think would ensure the fall of Jacob. With the dislocating of his thigh, it would be very difficult to stand. Yet, this was when Jacob prevailed. God teaches us the irresistable might of conscious weakness. For when we are weak in ourselves, we are strong by God's strength which we have received by grace (2Cor 12:9-10) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
| v10 has its example in Ezekiel and Daniel. It mentions prophets who had visions and were given symbols. The reason for these was to turn Israel back to God. It is very hard to see how the obscure visions of rams and horns (Daniel) or Temple dimensions (Ezekiel) would achieve this end, but nevertheless that's what they were designed for. Further evidence for this can be found in Eze 43:10. Here Ezekiel is commanded to explain the design of the temple "that they may be ashamed of their iniquities". Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
12:2 Hosea spoke against both Israel and Judah. However the repeated use of ‘Ephraim’ might lead the men of Judah to think that they were exempt from His judgement. Here, as in other places, the prophet reminds them that they have the same responsibilities and should, therefore, expect the same treatment if they are disobedient. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:4The historical e event spoken of here – the life of Jacob and the struggle with the angel – is more than a story, the prophet is saying. This is clear when the prophet said ‘He spoke with us’ – he does not say ‘spoke with you,’ Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.5 The KJV has memorial while the ESV has memorial name. Yahweh is the memorial Name of Israel's God. V.13 Moses was that prophet. To Moses, Yahweh revealed His memorial Name: I am who I am and I will be who I will be (Exo 3:13,14). Yahweh restates His Name here as a reminder to Israel that He is its God and that He will be worshipped according to the implications of His Name. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
12:8 The language of this verse shows how complacent the nation had become. Not only were they doing wrong but they did not even realise they were. Just like the ecclesia in Laodicea - Rev 3:17 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 the east wind is a reference to the simoon, the hot dry wind that blows from the desert, east of the Land of Israel. This is a destructive wind. Israel’s words and actions are likewise destructive. In its foolishness, Israel turned to Assyria and Egypt for help (Hos 5:13; 7:11). Oil represents fat things given as presents to Egypt, by Israel, as an attempt to gain Egypt’s help. V.3 Jacob means supplanter. He supplanted Esau his brother (Gen 25:26; 27:36). V.4 Jacob could not have overcome the angel if Yahweh had not allowed it (Gen 32:24-28). V.11 Gilead comes from two Hebrew words: gal meaning a heap of stones (as a field marker); and edh meaning witness (See Gen 31:46-48).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The worship of Jereboam's calves in Israel was a replacement for God. We might think that was silly. We'd never turn away from God in preference to an animal. But when we look at the clues of what this worship actually was, maybe we can see it is similar to the temptations we too are faced with. In v11 we learn that worship took place "in the furrows of the field" and in 10:4-5 that this was associated particularly with the calf idol. It suggests that this idolatry was exploiting the most basic and urgent need of mankind: to eat. Somehow the people had been persuaded that this god had power to grant a good harvest, and it had the form of an ox which could bring about prosperity by working the land (see Prov 14:4). So their temptation was exactly the same as ours: Do we spend all our time persuing prosperity and encumbered with daily life, or do we acknowledge God as the giver of all our needs? It is this distinction that made the sabbath such a big deal. Do I forego a day's prosperous work, or do I trust God that He will make up the lost day? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
|
12:5 The ‘memorial’ is the ‘scent’ of 14:7 – see the RVmargin of 14:7 Yahweh is not just a name. It encapsulates a purpose – that purpose if His glory being seen in the earth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 4
v.12 - Epaphras, who is mentioned here and in ch.1:7,
appeared to be a leading light in the founding of the church at Colosse. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:1 and 2:20 mark a progression. We 'die' in the waters of baptism and 'rise' to a new life Romans 6:4. If we have risen to a new life then the ways of the old life are left behind. Now we know that this relates to our sinful behaviour. However Paul extends this, to the brethren and sisters in Colosse, to those elements of Jewish tradition which burdened them. 4:5 Walking in wisdom is an exhortation to ensure that our lifestyle does not cause the name of God to be blasphemed. It is not good enough to just know that what we do is acceptable to God. We must also ensure that we also abstain from all appearance of evil 1 Thessalonians 5:22 as well. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 3:2
' Hid with God' draws on the warning of the Assyrian invasion, Yahweh, through
the prophet [Isaiah
26:20-21] who encourages the people to take refuge in Him. Speaking
of the Babylonian invasion the prophet [Jeremiah
39:18] encourages the people to trust in Him. Likewise the prophet [Zephaniah
2:3] echoes the words of Jeremiah, his contemporary, having the evidence
of Yahweh's deliverance of Hezekiah from Assyria to look to for comfort.
These evidences form a basis for Paul's exhortation to the brethren, against the background of their troubles 4:10-15 The way in which individuals are able to send greetings, and Paul is willing to include these greetings in such 'important' letters is a mark of how highly the Father views the fellowship between His sons and daughters. A lesson for us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| GREED Paul is at pains to point out to us the difference between the things from above and the things of our earthly nature. For this reason he gives us some examples of each so that we know what he is talking about. Much of what he lists as things of our earthly nature (things we should try and avoid) are well known to almost everybody.. Even the laws of our country condemn them, at least to some extent: "Sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry." (Colossians 3 v 5) The sin that seems out of place here (to me), and doesn't fit in with the harsher crimes such as sexual immorality, is greed. We don't often think of greed as a sin - and if we do, we consider it a "minor" sin. Yet greed is listed with the rest and we cannot escape its placing with the other sins, followed closely with the judgement, "Because of these the wrath of God is coming." (Verse 6) Greed is equated with idolatry because the motivation for greediness is the service to another god apart from the Lord - usually self. Greed puts God in second place. Greed is selfish. Rather than discouraging us, society encourages this sin through its system of retail advertising. Let's cleanse ourselves from this sin of greed, put God back in first place and allow him to supply our needs, instead of catering to our own wants. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
3:23 The focus of all our activities is that we should seek to please our Father. The danger always is that we might simply be doing things to seek the praise of men. 4:7-8 The details of Tychicus confirm that he took the letter from Paul to the ecclesia in Colosse. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Always
just the afterthought, in 3v15
Paul says "and be thankful". How important this advice is to us,
who are naturally "unthankful, unholy" (2
Tim 3v2). How un-thoughtful it would be if we were to leave our thanks
as an afterthought, or even forget it completely. In this chapter Paul contrasts
the works of the flesh with the works of the spirit, which, if we cling
to them, will let the peace of God rule in our hearts (v15).
What a contrast to the turmoil, stress, and self destruction that the other
things bring. When we see the contrast in our own lives now, compared to
our lives before, aught we not to give thanks for the transformation? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
3:15 In speaking of the 'peace' of God and being 'thankful' Paul is drawing on both aspects of the peace / thank offering of the law (Lev 3:1) 4:15 Our current way of meeting in purpose built or converted rooms for our meetings should not cause us to frown upon or be suspicious of believers just because they meet in homes. This was a common first century activity (Acts 2:46 , Rom 16:15, 1Cor 16:19 , Philem 1:2) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 3:3 Comforting words, we all fall short of establishing our mind of Christ. (V.2) but, we still have Christ. The new life, which is in Christ. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
3:11 The term Barbarian today means an uncivilized person. However, Paul's usage in his time meant something different . The term had become synonymous with foreigner. Originally, Barbarian referred to one who stuttered, a person of unintelligible speech. In a time when Greek was the language of culture, anyone who could not speak it was considered one who stammered and, therefore, an outsider (foreigner) to things Greek.The Scythians were a nomadic people who migrated from Asia to the area of southern Russia. They were considered savages (uncivilized people) and their name became synonymous with such. Paul, of course, is pointing out that those in Christ are no longer Jew, Greek, foreign, or uncivilized, although they might have once been. All are now one in Christ, changed to conform to His righteousness (Gal 3:28). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:9 Paul could have appealed to any number of different requirements but chooses, by the spirit, to say ‘lie not one to another’. This is paramount because any form of dishonesty between brethren and sisters destroys fellowship and unity. Dishonesty is more destructive and embarrassing truth. 4:8-9 Paul sent two brethren to Colosse to learn of their welfare. It is not that he did not trust one or other of those two brethren. Rather Paul is employing the pattern of Jesus who sent his disciples out two by two. Matt 21:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:4 In saying Christ is our ‘life’ we need to realise that Paul is talking abut our way of living – not simply the resurrection. Our life should centre around living like Jesus did. A similar point to that which we have seen in chapters 1 and 2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:1 One of the most remarkable features of the new society in Christ was the fact that bond and free took places side by side in the first century ecclesia. This was contrary to what they were used of, as we see in the letter that Paul wrote to Philemon who was from Colosse. We can also think of Christ's words "Neither be called masters, for you have one master". We can all do well by taking the role of a servant, which at times can be very difficult to do. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
4:5 ‘them that are without’ draws on Jesus’ words in Mark 4:11 so we understand that Paul s speaking of those who have no interest in the gospel. We might think that such people do not deserve our attention but Paul teaches the contrary. We show them Christ by the way in which we live. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:1-4 True believers in Jesus are not concerned with the things of this life, as are other people. They set their sights on spiritual things, obey the Lord’s commandments, and wait for His return to earth. If they are accepted by Him, they will be changed to become like Him (immortal - having possessed eternal life) (1Cor 15:53,54). That is the reward Jesus will bring to those who are faithful. The unfaithful will receive eternal death (Rev 22:12). In these two chapters, Paul elucidates some of the commands of Jesus to which the faithful must conform. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:9 Whilst Paul is opposing the yoke of the Law of Moses in the form of circumcision he still emphasises the moral teaching of the law. Here ‘lie not one to another’ quotes Lev 19:11 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:3 The word hid means to be hidden by covering. And so, those in Christ have had their sins covered by Him (Rom 4:7). Jesus was symbolized by the mercy seat where Yahweh would commune with His people (Exo 25:21,22). The NIV translates mercy seat as atonement cover. In this translation we can better see the effect of Jesus’ atonement as he covers our sins. 3:18-22 These behaviors do not have a widespread following in the modern world. But, they must be the norm to those who follow Jesus. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3:5 Covetness = greed = idolatry. We see that idolatry is not just bowing down to gods of wood, stone, or natural phenomena. Being greedy means that minds are intent in accumulating more than is necessary. To this pursuit there is no end. The parable of the rich man should serve as a warning (Luke 12:16-21 ). His energy had gone into the acquisition of material things instead of Yahweh's work. It is not possible to serve the god of greed and to serve Yahweh at the same time (Luke 16:13). Let us be content with what Yahweh gives us and put all our effort in serving Him (Matt 6:34; Phil 4:11;1Tim 6:8; Heb 13:5).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:5 Redeeming the time (KJV); making the best use of the time (ESV) comes from an expression meaning: to make the best profit you can from selling an article that was bought in the market (Conybeare and Howson).4:6 Salt is hydroscopic, meaning that it takes water from the air. Water is synonymous with the Word of God (John 7:38,39). The gift of the Holy Spirit, to us, is the Word of God, since the Bible was written under the direction of the Holy Spirit (2Pet 1:21). And so, Let your speech always…be seasoned with salt (KJV) means that our speech should be from the Word: If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God (KJV) (1Pet 4:11). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
4:9 ‘With Onesimus’ indicates that whilst Paul would have liked to keep Onesimus with him as he explained to Philemon he did send him back to Philemon who was his master. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
REDUCING DIVORCE They are only two little instructions in two little verses, but if we applied them to our marriages there would be a much smaller rate of separation and divorce than we see around us now. "Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them." (Col 3:18-19) Husbands, if our wives are going to want to submit to us then we need to show godly leadership - not just that we are the boss, but to lead our wives the way Christ leads the church. Let's pray for wisdom and pray that we can be godly leaders in our families. Wives, whether your husband is a good leader or not, it is your duty to submit to him. He is the one with the God given duty to make decisions and to lead. Ultimately he will be responsible for those decisions. Your responsibility is to submit to him just as the church should follow Christ. Husbands, love your wives. The word 'Love' is 'Agape' which means unconditional love. It is the love God has for us even though we are sinners. Even if she doesn't deserve it, as a husband it is our responsibility to love her unconditionally. Wives, aim to become a person your husband will want to love. Give him respect and honour as the representative of Christ in your home. And husbands, we must not be harsh with our wives. Many marriages break because of abuse. Let's make sure abuse is not the cause of our marriage break up, but be gentle, knowing that she is physically weaker and more emotionally vunerable than we are. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Robert |
||||||||||