November 21

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Nehemiah  9
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Nehemiah 9 online in the King James Version
Listen to Nehemiah 9 online in the New International Version

 

v.1-3 These first 3 verses represent what we would see as an extreme reaction, and yet it was clearly what was needed. Do we have a great enough awareness of the enormity of our sins? If we do, then we can also appreciate more fully the grace and mercy of God. How can we love God if we are not aware of the greatness of his salvation?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
9:23 Passages where the promise that Israel would be as the 'stars of heaven' occur. Genesis 26:4 Exodus 32:13 Deuteronomy 1:10 10:22 28:62
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.4,5 - In each of these lists we see eight people. Those who attach significance to numbers tell us that eight is the number of superabundance. That would certainly fit here as the context is that of a consideration of the greatness of God's mercy
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
In giving a summary of God's dealings with Israel this chapter, like so many other places (Psalm 78 Acts 7 etc) show that a reflection of the way that God has dealt with us and our response is a valuable exercise.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
9:1 These events took place just after the end of the feast of Tabernacles (Leviticus 23:34). Nehemiah was capitalising upon the renewed fervour of the people who had just kept a feast faithfully. There is nothing wrong with making a renewed resolve after a spiritually uplifting event such as a gathering or Bible School. Maybe we should seek out such events that we might be stirred up to renew our resolve.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Neh 9:1-3. Note the way that Ezra emphasizes the separation and dedication. 
      v1  Fasting—Self denial.
              Sackcloth—Recognition of unworthiness.
              Earth on heads—Humility.
      v2 Foreigners removed—Separation.
              Confession of sins—Remorse and repentance.
      v3  Law read—Study and reflection
              Sealing of the covenant—Dedication.

John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John

9:17 The juxtaposition of mention of Korah - the "captain" and God being "gracious and merciful" quoting Exo 34:6 provides a wonderful insight into Nehemiah's understanding of his God.

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Today’s chapter is another good example of a prayer.  We can, or should, talk to God as if He was standing beside us. The Lord God is so much greater than us, but He understands us, and knows how good it is sometimes just to talk – provided of-course that we show Him all the reverence and respect we can muster.  We can tell him what He has done, and tell Him that we wonder at, and appreciate, His longsuffering and goodness. We can thank Him, and beg for His blessing and protection.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
V.21 "they lacked nothing'' These are the most important words for us to remember in this chapter. Yahweh provided every necessity for them to gain their inheritance.Isa 51:16. The same has been provided for each one of us. Like Israel of old, if we fail to obtain a place in the kingdom we will have no one to blame but ourselves. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

 

Vs.1-3 The people were serious and sincere about their worship (sackcloth and fasting and separating themselves from unbelievers).  They spent three hours reading God's Word, and another three hours confessing their faults and praising Yahweh

Contrast that scene with today.  It seems a chore for some to haul themselves to Sunday meeting for an hour or two, not to mention any mid-week activity.  Having things too easy and having too many distractions is not conducive to worshipping Yahweh.  We need to seriously and sincerely put Yahweh first in our lives.  


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

8:6 ‘thou hast made … therein’ is quoted in Rev 10:6.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

In this prayer we see the love of God to his people expounded in many ways. We see the mercy of God in their deliverance out of Egypt (V.9-11). We see God's care for them, as He led Israel by fire and cloud (V.12). We see God providing the necessities of life (food and water V.15). We then see God's forgivness and blessings, dispite their ignorance, stubbornness, and disobedience. He never forsook them (V.31). Finally we see that they acknowledge that God's justice was evident in the punishment (V.33).


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

Neh 9:29 - "which if a man do, he shall live by them". Also Lev 18:15. In Rom 10:5 Paul quotes this, putting obedience of the law in juxtaposition with faith. By this time, the Jews already had more emphasis on the works of the Law than on faith. It was much more pronounced by Jesus' time. In Malachi, the solemn feasts and sacrifices were useless without a sincere honour of God.

Do I put works above faith? There must be a balance. Do I honour God one day, and dishonour him on others?


Michael Bull [New Westminster, Canada]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

9:27 The quotation from Leviticus 18:5 highlights Nehemiah’s understanding that it is not just a matter of saying that certain thing are right but that one also has to do those things.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
9:29 Even if a Jew could keep the law, (as Christ did), it did not have the capability to confer eternal life. This could only come on the basis of faith. (Gal 3:10-12,18,21, Heb 8:6,Rom 4:4) A Jew who rejoiced in God's gracious provision of wise and holy commands, would enjoy a harmonious relationship with his Heavenly Father and long life on the land. This was "living in them"....the precepts of the Law.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

9:18-19 Nehemiah cites another example of Israel’s rebellion in the wilderness – the making of the golden calf – but he uses it, not to reprove them but to show how God is willing to forgive.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.29 Here, we see an indictment against Israel’s refusal to obey Yahweh when given an opportunity. The phrase withdrew the shoulder (KJV) is interesting. It could be seen as the equivalent of giving the cold shoulder in modern parlance.

But, let’s take a look at the Hebrew. Withdrew comes from sarar which can mean to turn away in a moral sense; or to withdraw in a physical sense. The word for shoulder is katef which indicates the region where the garment hangs.

Since the beginning, garments have been important. When Adam and Eve sinned, Yahweh covered up their shame by clothing them: Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them (KJV) (Gen 3:21). In like figure, we are clothed with the righteousness of Jesus (Gal 3:27). To be naked is to be in a state of shame because one is not covered by Yahweh's righteousness.

If the region where the garment hangs (shoulder) is withdrawn (taken away), then the garment falls down and the person is rendered naked. Israel’s refusal to obey Yahweh made them naked and in a state of shame in Yahweh's eyes.

We can be spiritually safe only when we are covered with Christ's righteousness. Let us not only keep our garments on, but keep them in good condition (Jude 1:23).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

9:15 Nehemiah is reminding the congregation of God’s care for Israel. Here, speaking about the way God provided food in the wilderness, he quotes Psa 78:24


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
8. The Wilderness Journey from Egypt to Canaan was 40 years long. Exo 16:35 Num 14:33 Num 32:13 Deut 2:7 Deut 8:2,4 Deut 29:5 Josh 5:6 Neh 9:21 Psa 95:10 Acts 7:36 Acts 13:18 Heb 3:9,17. Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger
Neh 9:15;John 6:31.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

 

V.1 The 24th. Day of the month was two days after the feast of tabernacles had finished (from the 14th. To the 22nd.). The 23rd. Day was given to separation from strange wives and their children.

V.3 The people read in the book of the law (KJV) for three hours; and for another three hours the people confessed (their sins) (KJV) and worshipped (KJV)Yahweh.

V.6 etc. constitutes a summary of the history of Israel. Another summation chapter is Acts 7.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

9:28 In saying n his prayer that Israel had ‘cast thy law behind their backs’ Nehemiah is echoing the condemnation that the Psalmist gives – Psa 50:17


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

Neh 9:2 - a separate people (2Cor 6:14-18;2Cor 7:1).

Neh 9:6 - the Lord is alone and made the heavens, earth, seas and all that is alive.

Neh 9:7-8 - the covenant to Abraham has not yet been fulfilled (Gen 13:15;Acts 7:5;Heb 11:19,39).

Neh 9:15 - bread from heaven and water when a rock was struck perhaps echos Christ as the bread of life and the smote rock which provides living water (John 6:48-51,58;Num 20:8-11;1Cor 10:4;Isa 53:5;John 7:37-39;John 4:7-15).

Neh 9:26-28,33 - cycles of evil, punishment, repentance, mercy/deliverance.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Amos 1
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Amos 1 online in the King James Version
Listen to Amos 1 online in the New International Version

 

v.1 The point made here is that Amos was a 'nobody'. He was a humble shepherd from an insignificantly small town. The town of Tekoa was, by the way, in Judea, but he prophesied in Israel.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Notice that Amos says 'what he saw concerning ISRAEL' from which we should conclude that the message was directed, at least primarily, at the northern kingdom.There is only one specific reference to the earthquake in the days of Uzziah. Zechariah 14:5

And that some long time after, when all those who had experienced it would be long dead. This indicates that it must have been some terrible event with substantial destruction.

I believe that there are incidental references to that earthquake in the Isaiah who was alive at the time of the earthquake. Isaiah 24:1 - 20


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
We are constantly reminded over and over again that God will punish the persistently wicked
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Remember 1:1 tells us which kings were around when Amos spoke. So he is contemporary - in part at least - with Isaiah Hosea Micah.

1:9 The 'brotherly covenant' refers to 1 Kings 5:12. The agreement between Solomon and Tyre should have affected the way the men of Tyre responded even though the covenant was made between Solomon and Hiram many years ago.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
1:3 Notice that God's judgements came 'because' something had been done to displease Him. This is repeated 1:6,9,11,13 2:1,4,6. God always has a reason for His actions.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Amos 1:14. We read here of Rabbah, which was the capital of Ammom. To-day it is Amman which is the modern capital of Jordon.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John
1 Notice the recurring word 'fire' Amos 1:4,7,10,12,14, 2:2,5 The fire may well have been a literal event in each of the places named, however it is also an indication of the cleansing work of God.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
JUST A NOBODY
 
The prophet Isaiah was a man known in the court of the king; Jeremiah was a priest from the High Priest's family; Ezekiel was a priest; Daniel was a young man of the nobility of Judah; Amos was a shepherd from a small town in Judah. 
 
Have we seen the difference?  A lot of the people God used as his prophets were people of influence.  They were people who turned heads because of their position in the community.  But not Amos.  Amos was only a shepherd from a place that hardly anyone noticed.  And further still , he was only "one of the shepherds of Tekoa." (Amos 1:1)  He was the man with the common job, in a small town, and we would never have known he existed had he not spoken the words of God.
 
Just like Amos, not many of us are born into noble families or raised into jobs or positions of honour in the communities in which we live.  Most of us live in relative obscurity and are hardly noticed by the rest of the world.
 
God chose Amos to proclaim his message.  Amost must have been a man who walked with God, and lived for God, for God to have chosen him as his prophet.  As far as God was concerned, Amos was one of his chosen people, not a nobody as others would have seen him.
 
We don't have to be superstars to be chosen by God or to make an impact for him.  God can use us right now, right where we are if we love him and give ourselves to him.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Robert

 

V.1 Amos, whose name means burden prophesied about 755 BC during the reigns of Uzziah in Judah, and Jeroboam II in Israel.  He was a contemporary of Hosea. 

Amos, who unlike other prophets of noble background, was a breeder of sheep.  He was probably an employer of shepherds, and therefore, could leave his enterprise in the hands of his workers while he went on his mission. 

His mission (burden), took him from his home in Tekoa which was located about 16 km south of Jerusalem.  He relocated to Bethel where he prophesied.  He was a cross-over prophet in that he was a Judean who prophesied in Israel. Yahweh selects whomever He will from men and women of whatever background and geographical location to do His work. 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael
God uses a number of repetitions in the first two chapters: “I will send a fire” in Amos 1:4,7,10,12,14, and Amos 2:2,5. Surrounding nations are targeted first, then in Amos 2:4 Judah is to be destroyed by the same Lord God. He then concludes with a similar punishment in Amos 7:4-6, which, in His great mercy, is rescinded.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

1:2 The Lord roaring out of Zion matches the message of Joel – Joel 3:16. maybe indicating that Joel and Amos were contemporary and they, by the Holy Spirit, confirmed each other’s words that in the mouth of two witnesses the words might be established – Deut 17:6


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

Exo 20:5 appears to contradict other scripture which tells us that God doesn't punish a son for his father's sins. Here in Amos we seem to get a good answer to that problem. In v3, 6, 9, 11, 13 we read "for three transgressions and for four...". It was after the fourth transgression that God would act to punish a nation. Likewise in Gen 15:16 God waited four successive generations for the Amorites to repent before He punished them. Is it possible that Exo 20:5 is telling us that God waits for 4 successive evil generations before He will punish a nation?


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Rob

1:3 One of the transgression of Damascus (Syria) is seen in the days of Jehu – 2Kin 10:33


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

1:1 Tekoa is generally understood to be a town on the edge of the Judean hills, south of Bethlehem, Being in the rain shadow of the Judean hills is was not a very fertile area which would have made Amos’s job – a herdman - a little difficult.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

1:11 Edom (Esau) was brother to Israel. Israel had been told not to oppress Edom because of the family relationship but Edom did not feel in any way constrained by the family connection. Rather, it seems, the family connection engendered hatred, not love.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.2 Carmel means fruitful place (park). And so, the symbol of fertility shall wither.

V.3 The first of six condemnations was against Syria.

V.4 Hazael inflicted great cruelty on Israel (2Kin 8:12). Ben-hadad was Hazael’s son.

V.5 Aven means vanity. The plain of Aven is associated with idolatry because the idol temple of Baalbek or Heliopolis, the city of the sun god Baal, was located there.

The house of Eden (KJV) Beth-eden (ESV) means house of pleasure and probably refers to the King of Damascus’ rural residence.

Kir was a place that was under the control of the Assyrians. Its location is in the present-day Armenian region, between the Black and Caspian Seas.

V.6 During Sennacherib’s invasion of Judah, some Jews fled to Philistine cities. There were five main Philistine cities (1Sam 6:17). But, instead of the Philistines giving hospitality to the fleeing Jews, they sold them to the Edomites.

V.9 The same charge is made against Tyre as was laid against the Philistines (Joel 3:6).

V.12 Teman was a place in Edom (Obad 1:9). Bozrah is also in Edom (actually in Idumea, which is the western part of Edom, from where the Herods derived) (Isa 34:6).

Vs.13,14 Ammon lay east of the Jordan and bordered Gilead on the north. Rabbah was the capital of Ammon.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

1:13 So we see the motivation of Ammon was territorial. But God had given Giled to Israel when they arrived from Egypt. All the land on the east of Jordan was possessed by Israel, at God’s instruction. This is just the point that Jephthah made – Judg 11:14-27


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - 1Timothy  1, 2 and 3
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to 1Timothy 1 online in the King James Version Listen to 1Timothy 2 online in the King James Version Listen to 1Timothy 3 online in the King James Version
Listen to 1Timothy 1 online in the New International Version Listen to 1Timothy 2 online in the New International Version Listen to 1Timothy 3 online in the New International Version

 

3 v.1 - It seems generally agreed that the term 'bishop' and the more commonly used term 'elder' are interchangeable. This makes it easier, I suspect, for most of us to relate to. Where to our modern mind we may see a 'bishop' as someone with a great deal of authority over a large number of churches, here his oversight is just of his own church. The first century church, quite rightly, had no further hierarchy.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

1:6 the Greek of the phrase 'turned aside' only occurs 5 times in Scripture.

1624
1 Timothy 1:6 5:15 turned aside
1 Timothy 6:20 avoiding
2 Timothy 4:4 turned
Hebrews 12:13 turned out of the way

2:2 That request for a peaceful life be granted us by the authorities is a regular request of the apostle Paul. The fact that he makes the point on more than one occasion demonstrates the need to pray in this manner on a regular basis. Of course we should also thank God for the measure of freedom that we have. It is not appropriate to simply ask for things and not thank Him for giving us those things we ask for.

3:8 deacons - the deacons in the first century were ministers, that is brethren and sisters who served. We might say that Stephen was a deacon as the word 'serve' Acts 6:2 is used to speak of the 'office' of Stephen. The fact that he was stoned for preaching the gospel demonstrates that roles and offices appointed by the holy spirit are not fixed categories within which one has to work. Stephen 'did the work of an evangelist' though he was a deacon.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

1:8 The letter to Timothy were written late in Paul's life. The phrase
'the law is good' is a quotation from Romans 7:16
'Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners' quotes Romans 5:8
Thus we see that the preaching of Paul appeals to his earlier spirit guided writings.

2:8 The lifting up of hands in prayer is something which echoes Old Testament practices. Nehemiah 8:6 Psalm 28:2 Psalm 141:2 etc:

3:16 'Great is the mystery of Godliness' contrasts powerfully with 'Great is Diana of the Ephesians' (Acts 19:28)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

1:15 The 'faithful saying' is a quotation from Romans 5:8

2:1 Do we think 'prayers and supplications' should be the first thing we do?

3:7 The reason why Timothy would be able to implement the requirement that Bishops were to be of 'good report' was because Timothy, himself, was of good report (Acts 16:1-2)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
3:5 - The phrase "take care" is a interesting study.
It is Strong's 3199. The only other time this word is used is in the story of the Good Samaritan Luke 10:34,35.
In the story there are of course many lessons, but one we all as individual members of Christ's ecclesia can not overlook is that of individual responsibility. We note that the Samaritan used his own wine and oil to soothe and heal the victim's wounds, he used his own beast as a means of transporting the victim, and paid with his own money for care during the recovery period. Christ when finished telling the story said "Go, and do thou likewise."
We clearly see that as leaders within the ecclesia we all have personal responsibilities. This goes along with the over all ecclesial care for the members of the household.

John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John

1:18 'war a good warfare' quotes Numbers 4:23 'perform the service' - see margin. So the war that Timothy - and we -a re to be involved in is a war of service to God. It is a war because the flesh resists the desire to serve God.

2:4 God is willing for al men to be saved (2Pet 3:9) is this our attitude also - or are we selective in whom we preach to or think are suitable to approach with the gospel message?

3:11 It is important to note that the wives of brethren with responsibilities had responsibilities also. It is so easy to see a brother's work as his service and for the wife to feel that she has nothing to do with that work. However her very demeanour can either enhance or hinder the husband's work in the Lord.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
1:19-20 - Here we have mention of Paul handing over people with spiritual challenges to a satan (4567) which refers to Heb.(7854) means an opponent, adversary so that they may learn not to blaspheme (987) means to vilify, to speak impiously, blaspheme, defame, rail on, revile, speak evil. If satan was an evil supernatural creature why would he be assisting people not to blaspheme? Satan in this instance likely refers a brother providing wise counsel or perhaps a disfellowshipping out of the community of believers which could assist a person to self-examine and hopefully learn so they could hopefully be restored back into the brotherhood.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles
2:13-14 It was to Adam that the direction was given (Gen 2:16-17) Yet he remained silent. Adam made a choice; between God and man.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

1:9  It might seem paradoxical that the law was not made for a righteous man. But the law actually highlighted sin – not righteousness. Rom 7:7

2:13-14  Notice the careful use of the creation account to emphasise principles of ecclesial life v11. The force of the argument relies on the literality of the events in the garden of Eden.

3:7  ‘them that are without’ is Jesus’ way of speaking of those who do not heed his words – Mark 4:11.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

1:7 Teachers who do not understand was a characteristic of Israel’s leaders. Jesus called them blind leaders Matt 15:14. We run the same danger. Setting ourselves up as teachers on unimportant matters which cannot be defined from Scripture


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

2:9    ‘in like manner’ shows that the demeanour of sisters in their dress advertises their heart and mind – or at least it should. In the same way that the way in which brethren pray should show their attitude.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

1:10 'menstealers’ seems to be a technical word with specific references to a trade which took place in a society where slavery was common. A ‘menstealer’ kidnapped or by other means took free men and sold them as slaves. So whilst Scripture does not condemn the owning of slaves the method by which certain men were made slaves is condemned.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

1:3 That they teach no other doctrine (KJV) (See Gal 1:6-9).

1:4 See Titus 1:14; 3:9.

1:5,14 Here the Greek word agape is translated into both charity and love. From an historical point of interest, the King James Version revisers used extant Bibles as well as original manuscripts. Two of the Bibles used were the Reims New Testament and the Geneva Bible. Charity comes from the Reims, while love comes from the Geneva.

There was debate amongst the KJV revisers whether to use the same word (from one version) throughout, but it was decided to give deference to both versions by including the rendering from each.

1:10,11 Those practicing homosexuality do so contrary to the sound doctrine of the gospel. And yet, there are gay ministers in churches who advocate, as society now does, that homosexuality is a normal and accepted lifestyle. Who are you going to believe - society or the Word of God?

1:17 Despite Israel’s hankering for an earthly king, Yahweh has always ruled (Exo 15:18).

1:19 Paul often uses nautical metaphors. Holding faith meant holding to sound doctrine. If this is not retained, control of the ship of faith will be lost. The contrary winds and waves will buffet the ship and drive it on to the shoals and wreck it (Eph 4:14).

2:1,2 Let us remember to pray for those in authority over us, and not to engage in political criticism of elected officials.

2:5 Jesus has brought Yahweh to us, and so we can address Yahweh directly in prayer in the Name of Jesus.

2:9,10 In today’s fashion-conscious world, a woman of Christ must constrain her urges and present herself modestly.

2:11-15 Women’s libbers should take note that gender equality in Christ will not be fully realized until the Kingdom. For now, the divine hierarchy: God à Jesus à Man à Woman, is in place..

3:2,12 Paul makes it clear that polygamy is not acceptable in Christ. Paul’s statement about marriage, in this verse, also proves wrong the Catholic practice of celibacy for priests (1Tim 4:3).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
1v9-10 is a good explanation of what the law of Moses was for. Gal 3:19 says the same.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

2:12 ‘usurp authority’ is well rendered ‘have dominion’ which reflects the status in creation – Adam was to have dominion over creation – not Eve. Of course this is not teaching that Adam was to dominate Eve. But to mark the distinct and different roles between Adam and Eve.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter