|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| v.2
- Here we have the concept of willingness again. God requires that we be
willing. Those that are willing to do his service are blessed, we can conclude
from this verse. Jud.5:9,
2Cor.8:16,17 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| The walls
of the city of Jerusalem had been built but few lived in it. Nor, it seems,
did many want go there even though it had been the capital and the religious
centre of the land. So Nehemiah arranges for 10% of those who had returned
from the captivity to go and live there. If we take the total of those who
came to Jerusalem we can calculate the total population of the land. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| v.2
- I have noticed this year in my reading that there are a number of incidences
of the concept of people blessing, so my rather naive concept that blessing
is something that can only be conferred from the greater person to the lesser,
but this cannot be true. We are instructed to bless God on at least 15 occasions,
so my idea must be wrong. Blessing is something that we can confer on each
other, and indeed should. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| v.2
Whilst the selection of the 10% who were to dwell at Jerusalem was by the
casting of lots it seems that there were some who willingly offered to go.
These individuals received a blessing. Maybe they were chosen by lot and
did not simply agree to go but were enthusiastic in their commitment. Where
do we stand when there is work to do? Do we do it, but grudgingly or are
we enthusiastic and cheerful in our commitment? The lord loveth a cheerful
giver (2
Corinthians 9:7) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
11:20 The reason for selecting 10% of the population of the land to dwell in Jerusalem was to ensure the security of the city. However there was no sin in those who remained in the villages. They could not all live in Jerusalem else the rest of the land would have fallen into the hands of Israel's enemies. Likewise we can not all be involved in a particular task so we should not feel guilty just because we are unable to perform some task in the Ecclesia. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 11:4 Jerusalem was on the border of Judah and Benjamin so it is fitting that it was members of those tribes - and only those tribes - who were chosen by lot to dwell at Jerusalem. It was fitting also that some Levites went also (Neh 11:15) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| New situations demand new ways of organisation. Neh 11:1,2 says that they cast lots to get 1 in 10 of the people to live inside Jerusalem, while the rest went to the other cities of Judah. There were only 42,360 Jews, plus their servants, who had returned (Neh 7:66-69), which meant that there were only just over 4,000 inside Jerusalem. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||||
| V.1 one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem: thus the people offer themselves as human tithes; the true spirit of self-drnial. Not only would the defences be strengthened, but the rebuilding of the city would be advanced with these additional workers. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||
11:20 In saying that the residue lived in the cities of Judah we see an accurate comment for the cities that are now mentioned are in Judah. So incidentally we learn that the extent of the land that was inhabited by Jews in the days of Nehemiah was quite limited. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
11:23 There had been a need to encourage people to go to Jerusalem. 10% of the population had gone. There were things to do, an enemy to withstand and service to keep. It is against that background that the ‘singers’ are required. Whilst it might have been thought that singers in the temple was a luxury that had to be dispensed with it was actually seen as a valuable job that had to be don. Thus it can be seen that continual praise to God was a priority, even in difficult circumstances. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.1 The returnees gravitated to their ancestral towns and villages of Judah. And, there would have been those who went to their heritage in Jerusalem. However, Jerusalem was under popuated for its size and importance. And so, people living outside were persuaded, by lot, to occupy the city. There had been 10,000 people taken captive from Jerusalem in the first Babylonian invasion of 598 BC. The capital had to be occupied to flourish and to defend the recently rebuilt walls. All the houses in Jerusalem had been destroyed and so there was a great need to re-build (2Kin 25:9). This was indeed a new town and a new start. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.32 Anathoth was a city of priests in the tribal allotment of Benjamin, and was located about 3 miles (4.8 km) from Jerusalem. Jeremiah was pre-occupied for decades in prophesying to the people of Judah and Jerusalem about coming destruction and their subsequent captivity in Babylon. And yet, Yahweh had Jeremiah secure the purchase of a field in Anathoth (Jer 32:7-9). Yahweh wanted to signal that, after their captivity in Babylon, there would be a restoration of the people to the land and the city. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
11:36 This seemingly casual comment that there were Levites in Judah and Benjamin masks a significant point. Nehemiah was not simply concerned with the situation in Jerusalem. He was also concerned to maintain the spirituality of the rest of the land. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Neh 11:1-2 - John Wilson makes an interesting 2005 comment as to "human tithes"; possibly not all of the chosen 10% was particularly willing to give up what they had for Jerusalem; the Lord loves a cheerful giver (2Cor 9:7). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| v.8
- This principle, borne out particularly in the account of Balaam and Balak
in Num.22-24
where, regardless of his desire for reward (2Pet.2:15),
Balaam was forced to speak the words of God, is one which convinces me particularly
of the power of God in inspiring the writers of the scriptures. The prophets
quite clearly were, at the times of their prophesyings, quite unable to
influence the words that they spoke by the action of their own will. Quite
a telling phrase here in this verse. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
3:1 Notice that whilst the message is directed against 'Israel' it is for 'the whole family' which was brought out of Egypt. Israel and Judah thought that they were different 'fellowships' but such distinctions do not exist with the Father. 3:2 It is noteworthy that Yahweh's controversy with the Gentile cities which hated Israel is brief: "I will send a fire." But Israel had been brought into the place of privilege and so of responsibility, and the Lord's indictment is detailed and unsparing. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| v.3
- Here is a clear statement of fellowship. Fellowship exists when there
is agreement. Walking together is then possible. Let us beware how we interpret
this. It must not be used to pick holes in our fellow man, but instead to
instruct us in how to walk in agreement with God, with whom is the only
fellowship that leads to life. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:6-7
Whilst we might use these verses to show that God speaks about the future
the reason why the prophet spoke these words was because in Judah and Israel
there were those who would have responded to the judgements of God - 'If
we had known then
'. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:14
Bethel - the house of God (Genesis
28:17-19) - had become a place of idolatry in the days of the kings
of Israel. (1
Kings 12:28-29). Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Amos 3:7. As we are surrounded with wars and threats of war, we clearly see that nations cannot go to war as they please, it is the Lord sends them to accomplish His purpose. Assyria and Babylon are good examples.(Jer 51:6) We must also realize that He sends the floods, the earthquakes, famines, and pestilence. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:10-11 The judgment upon the northern kingdom was simply because 'they know not to do right' - but they did know! They had been told but the word had no effect upon them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| V.3 A man of the world, and a man of God could not work in common, as regards to principles and aims of life, without either the man of the world giving in to the man of God (which is improbable), generally the man of God becomes corrupted by the man of the world. They are of two different minds. Compare with 1Cor 6:14 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||
Vs.3-5 Yahweh asks a series of questions illustrating cause and effect: two people cannot walk (grow, flourish) together unless there is mutual agreement ; lions will roar (as a sign of protective ownership) when they are in possession of food; a bird cannot be caught unless a trap is set for it; and no-one will set a trap unless there is prospect of a catch; a warning trumpet evokes fear in the people; and if disaster comes it is because Yahweh has caused it (v.6 cf. Isa 45:7).Yahweh is illustrating how sin separates His people from Him. The cause of righteousness, from Israel, will have an effect on the relationship with Yahweh. V.7 Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets (KJV). This powerful statement shows how Yahweh works to declare His counsel. Prophets have been chosen, throughout time, as instruments to announce Yahweh's will. Yahweh's will has been written down so that believers of all generations can gain wisdom and understanding. The Bible is that declaration of God's will and plan with humankind. Salvation is possible by reading it (2Tim 3:15). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
| There’s a lovely reference to God and his people Israel, in Amos 3:3. two cannot walk together unless they be agreed. Youngs’ Concordance tells us that “agreed” means to meet together by appointment. So God is saying that He made an arrangement with Abraham, but Abraham’s seed have not kept to that appointment. Fancy not turning up to meet God! That is really letting the Lord down. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||||
3:3 We might be inclined to think that the ‘two’ who could not walk together were Israel and Judah. However the problem was more serious than this. Neither Israel nor Judah was able to walk with God, unlike Enoch – Gen 5:22 – because their behaviour was so abhorrent to Him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| V.6 When the sound of the alarm is trumpeted by the watchman of the city, the people are sure to run about in preparation to address the warning. Yet Israel is not alarmed, though God threatens judgments John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||
| The houses of Ivory in v15 appear to refer to the house Ahab built in Samaria, mentioned in 1Kin 22:39. The function of this house appears to have been linked to the system of false worship set up in Samaria, and in particular the inclusion of temple prostitutes. Modern bible translations render 1Kin 22:38 "while the harlots bathed". Ahabs house and the false religion of Samaria were obviously still around at the time of Amos, and God intended to destroy it. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||||
3:3 This verse regarding two acting in a spirit of unity & agreement, links up with Matt 18:19,20 The passage in Matthew is often interpreted as indicating that it doesn't matter how small a group of believers is in order for the Lord to be present. Actually, in the context of the whole passage Matt 18:15-20 , the idea is the same as that in Amos ie that the spirit of unity is indicated by their being together (& therefore the Lord is present with them).
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||||||||||||
3:9-10 It seems that the prophet was concerned that the nations round about Israel would see the judgements against Israel. this would show them that the God of Israel will not tolerate falsehood in His people. Lest those nations thought that Israel’s God was powerless. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:2 Because the God of Abraham had separated Israel from the nations round about them and had made a covenant with them, they were expected to extend that obedience which their favored position demanded. We, likewise are exhorted to walk worthy of our high calling (1Thess 2:12). If we do not, we incur our Heavenly Father's discipline. We must bear in mind also that punishment does not prove that he is against us; it is the opposite, it is His love towards us. Heb 12:5-6 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||
3:2 A fundamental principle is taught here. Because God had brought Israel out of Egypt they had a responsibility to respond to God’s love. Because they were not doing so He was going to punish them more than the nations who did not know Him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.7 Jesus was a prophet. Moreover, He was the special prophet who Moses promised would come (Deut 18:15,18; Acts 3:20-22). That prophet would be the Messiah. Jesus gave witness to His special status by performing miracles. When He did so, some Jews openly proclaimed Him as that special prophet (John 6:14; 7:40). We have the recorded Word to verify that Jesus is the Prophet, the Messiah. He is the only way to salvation (Acts 4:12). Jesus also accurately predicted the downfall of the temple, which occurred in 70 AD. This prediction secured Jesus as a true prophet (Deut 18:22). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
3:3-6 The series of questions – each of the questions would elicit the answer ‘no’ – This is just the point. God was intervening because there was a cause. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth. Yahweh had chosen Israel to be a special people unto Him (Deut 14:2). V.3 While God’s people obeyed Him they both walked together. But now since the people disobeyed Yahweh, the two had become alienated from each another. Vs.4-6 Three metaphors are used to underscore v.3. V.7 Yahweh used His prophets to both exhort His people to mend their ways; and also to forecast His will (Isa 46:9,10). V.8 Yahweh’s prophets had no choice but to prophesy (Jer 20:9). V.9 Ashdod is synonymous with Gaza, which describes the Philistines. Both the Philistines and Egypt were nations of great idolatry. But, these idolatrous nations would look upon Samaria (synonymous with Israel) and bear witness to its idolatry. Vs.12,14,15 Israel would be punished for its sins. Nevertheless, a remnant of Israel would be saved. The reference to Damascus occurs because Jeroboam II had secured that city for Israel (2Kin 14:28). Yahweh is Israel’s shepherd (Jer 31:10). Ironically, Amos, God’s prophet was also a shepherd (1:1). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
3:14 The ‘visit’ that God is speaking of is the Assyrian invasion which eventually took Hoshea captive Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| v.6-8
- The current writer knows himself to be in great need of this exhortation.
Contentment with our lot is very much against the religion of our age. We
grow up in a world where discontent, complaint and compnesation seeking
are the maxims of living. We must fight even harder to stay away from these
thoughts and employ instead this simplicity of the outworking of our belief. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6:5
'from such withdraw yourselves' is teaching us to shun and avoid those who
are doing and saying things which are not 'to the edifying of the church'.
This is an individual matter. We should make our own decisions about who
is and who is not helpful in our walk and take the appropriate personal
action. I don't feel that Paul is speaking of 'disfellowship' in this passage. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6:20
The plea to Timothy to 'keep' the charge committed to him being contrasted
with the warning to 'avoid' babbling shows us that the company we keep -
either in life or the way we think - affects our spirituality. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| :15
'King of kings and Lord of lords' quotes Deuteronomy
10:17. So towards the end of Paul's life he encourages Timothy to think
about Israel's experiences at the end of their wilderness journey, just
before they entered into the land of their inheritance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6:4-5 We see the signs so well - in others - of strife and pointless talking. We do well to remember Jesus' parable about beams and motes (Matt 7:3). The very pride of the one who is striving about words may well be we who are looking disapprovingly at others. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.10,17,18,19 - After being cautioned about the love of money we read of how those with wealth can best comport themselves. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||||
We have an interesting similarity between the first chapter and this chapter
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||
6:20 The danger of ‘vain babbling’ is that the one babbling end us in error abut the things of the gospel. Sometimes the irrelevant things which we think are so important become a snare to us and pride, getting in the way, separates brethren. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
6:6-10 the idea of the love of money goes back to Ecc 5:10 A good test of how much we love money/material goods, is to ask ourselves how satisfied we are with what we have.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||||||||||||
6:8 The injunction to contentment is based on Prov 30:8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.10 In general conversation, this verse is often misquoted. It is not that money is the root of all evil, but that the love of money is the root of all evil. Money is an inert commodity. Intrinsically it is neither good nor evil. How it is used and what focus it occupies in people's lives is the concern. Love connotes adoration, promotion, and protection. Where money is concerned, these pre-occupations can lead to negative actions. If we have been blessed with monetary means, let us always be ready to use them wisely and generously in the service of the Lord. It would be a mistake to be carried away with the false sense of power that money can bring (v.17). Remember Jesus' parable on such matters (Luke 12:16-21). Let's make the Lord the object of our love, and our money an instrument of service to Him (Luke 16:13). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
6:7 It is difficult for us to appreciate that ‘we brought nothing into this world’. We often behave as if we have achieved great things and the wealth or possessions that we have are a product of our own efforts. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.7 The truth of this verse reminds me of a funny observation. There were two Jewish gentlemen, Cohen and Shapiro, who attended the funeral of their friend Goldberg. Cohen said to Shapiro: You know Goldberg was a very wealthy man - how much did he leave? Shapiro turned to Cohen and coolly replied: All of it! Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
6:10 we see in 1Tim 6:6 that Godliness is what to strive for. The contrast, the love of money, produces just the opposite to Godliness in a believer – though it seems t offer short term benefits! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||
V.1 Masters who are unbelievers should be honored for the sake of the Lord. This applies whether the master is good or bad. V.2 The master who is a believer is, of course, a brother to the one who serves him. As a brother, he should treat his fellow servant in Christ with respect. V.5 Some have used religion for monetary gain. Newsworthy examples, in our age, are some tele-evangelists. These corrupt people love money (v.10). V.12 The prize for the true believer is eternal life not wealth in this life. Vs.15,16 This is descriptive of Yahweh. But, Jesus shall assume the title of the King of kings, and Lord of lords when He returns (Rev 17:14;19:16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||
6:11 ‘meekness’ is not an attribute that the world respects. Meekness is taken as a sign of weakness. However Moses – Num 12:5– was the meekest man on earth, yet he could lead a nation! His trust was in God and not in himself. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||