November 27

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Esther  2
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Esther 2 online in the King James Version
Listen to Esther 2 online in the New International Version

 

v.23 - As there seems to be no reference to this type of punishment in Chronicles, the chronicles before the king here must be that referred to also in ch.10:2 - that of the kings of the Medes and Persians
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
2:5 Notice the genealogy of Mordecai.
He was a direct descendant from Saul the king.
Now when we see Haman's ancestry we note Esther 3:1 that he was a direct an Agagite.
Saul had been told to utterly destroy Agag 1 Samuel 15:3, 9. But he did not. The book of Esther demonstrates the way in which that unfinished work of Saul is completed at the words of Mordecai.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
We must bear in mind what a great risk Esther took in doing these things. We need to realise that the road we tread which leads to salvation is never easy. We are called upon in various ways to stand up for our heavenly citizenship. Let us look to the example of Esther when this happens to us.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
2:20 In telling us that Esther did the commandment of Mordecai we learn that she was a faithful 'daughter' - her life was at risk if she did as Mordecai requested of her.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
TRUE BEAUTY
Esther had a special beauty that far exceeded all the other young girls in King Xerxes beauty contest. Esther was lovely in form and features, as, no doubt, were many of the other girls. But I believe that the difference between Esther and the rest was found in her nature. She seems to have won the favour of Hegai as soon as she met him and he gave her the best place in the harem. When she was with the king she pleased him more than any other girl and he made her his queen. Her character gave her a beauty that outshone all the rest. When she went to the king she took nothing except for what Hegai suggested. Other girls would have decorated themselves and taken things to make them more attractive - but Esther had an inner beauty.
In 1 Peter 3 v 3 - 4 we read, "Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewellery and fine clothes. Instead it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a meek and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight."
No matter what we look like, we can all have that true inner beauty that will outshine and outlast any physical beauty. That is what is valuable to God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
2:1 and 3:1 The repeated use of 'after these things' shows that these chapters are setting the scene for some greater event which is recorded later in the book. It is as if these chapters are simply providing the background the for the deliverance so they are even the more remarkable for showing how God was working away in the background to ensure that at the right time Esther would be in place to provide deliverance to His people.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Esther 2:7. It is interesting to take a look at Esther as the bride of Christ
      King’s bride--- Christ’s bride.
      She replaced Vashti as the bride---Spiritual Israel replaces natural Israel as bride.
      She was an orphan, adopted. 
Rom 8:15,23.
      She was grafted in. 
Rom 11:16-23
      She was chosen. 2Thess 2:13
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John
2:10,20 We might think that Esther  not showing her nationality shows some sort of weakness or lack of faith on her part. However in that area of the world it would not be obvious that she was different from the other women. There had not been a need to make her Jewishness known. But we do see that when her people were in danger of being destroyed she did, at great risk to her own life, advertise he nationality.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
The fact that the king “loved Esther above all the women” was of the Lord. His plans were being worked out, despite the fact that few in that city knew of it.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
V.2-3 - word goes out to all nationalities seeking a replacement for Vashti who was the  originally chosen one. The king allows others to help him in this reaching out process. V.8 - we find Esther or "Hadassah" (1919) which means "myrtle", one of the newly called. V.7 - Hadassah is adopted by Mordecai who may be a type of Christ. This myrtle may refer to the Feast of Tabernacles and during this 7 day festival, 5 days after the Day of Atonement, people lived in booths that included myrtle, a type of wood. In Zech 14:16 - we read of a future age where nations will worship the Lord and celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles. "Esther" according to Smith's means "star" and according to the book "Esther" by John Knowles is derived from the root word "Sathar" which means "hidden or concealed". Est 2:10 - Mordecai had her conceal her nationality. When Christ returns the identity of the saints will no longer be concealed. V.12 - the oil may infer an anointing of dedication to God's service while the sweet odors may be symbolic of prayers to God. V.15 - there is no indication of any jealousy of Esther's beauty, on the contrary, her inner beauty won her the approval of everyone. In the 7th year of the king, Esther replaces Vashti. V.20 - indicates Esther always followed Mordecai's instruction (as we are to follow Christ's) and in v.22 she gives him the credit (we can't earn salvation, Christ deserves the credit). Ironically, "Mordecai" means "little man" according to Smith's suggesting he wasn't externally impressive just as Christ wasn't. But in v.5 the word "certain" (376) can infer "mighty, great, worthy". In v.19 and 10 other places we find Mordecai sitting at the king's gate. Similarly, Christ is the gate to eternal life and mankind's mediator to approaching the Father. V.23 - faithful to the king, Mordecai was near two criminals who were hanged on a "gallows" (6086) which can mean "a tree, wood, plank, carpenter, gallows". Is this a foreshadowing echo of the crucifixion of the two thieves?
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles
V.12 The two symbols used during the period of preparation of the bride are a beautiful lesson to all who desire to be part of the multitdous bride of Christ. They summarize two principles which must govern their lives. They must act the part of a priest (Mal 2:7) and must engage in prayer. Their lives must be balanced between these principles. The lesson is clear; is our life balanced between study of the Word and prayerful communion with our Heavenly Father? Oil of Myrrh was an element of the annointing oil used to annoint Aaron (Exo 30:23) It speaks of a life separated and dedicated to the service of God. The sweet odours of spices was symbolical of prayer (Psa 141:2
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
Esther is a common name used by Jews today.  Actually it is the Persian name Ishtar Ishtar was the Mesopotamian goddess of fertility.  She is also associated with Venus and the Queen of Heaven (Jer 7:18).  (Hot-cross buns are today's equivalent to cakes to the Queen of Heaven).  According to the mythology, Ishtar had a lover Tammuz, who was the god of vegetation.  Ishtar betrayed Tammuz, the result of which Tammuz died.  His death was reflected by the decaying vegetation experienced at the fall of the year.  Happily, Tammuz was resurrected each spring and, thus, new vegetation abounded.  Ezekiel experienced the idolatry of Jewish women mourning for Tammuz outside of the temple in Jerusalem (Eze 8:14,15).  After the Jews returned from the Babylonian exile, they brought with them the adopted Babylonian names for their months.  Tammuz became the new name for June/July.  Esther's Hebrew name was Hadassah which means myrtle.  Contrast the association of Esther (idolatrous goddess of fertility) with Hadassah (myrtle), a symbol of Yahweh's abundant fertility (Isa 41:19; 55:13). 
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael
Esther's becoming queen is somewhat analogous to our life in Christ.  Vashti had spurned her king (1:12).  The Jews did the same thing to their king, the Lord Jesus (Mark 8:31; 12:10).  Ahasuerus (Xerxes) then looked for a new queen, and a selection process was begun (2:2).  After the Jews rejected Christ, He turned to the Gentiles for a new bride (cf. Acts 13:45,46;15:14).   Esther was selected as a candidate for the royal position and was brought into the king's house (v.8).  Likewise, we are selected as candidates for royal positions (Rev 20:6) and we are brought into the king's house (Christ's ecclesia Heb 3:6).  Esther then embarked upon a process of purification attended to by helpers (v.9).  Our process of purification begins after the waters of baptism as we hone our character to conform to Christ's (Eph 4:21-24); our helpers are the angels (Heb 1:14).  Esther's process of purification took one year to complete, which is quite a time (v.12).  Our time of preparation is also considerable (a lifetime), which, like Esther, we must endure to be successful (Matt 10:22).  After the time of preparation, Esther, together with all the other candidates, was called before the king for inspection (v.13).  We too will be presented to the king (Jesus) for inspection (judgement) after our time of preparation is completed (Rom 2:16; 2Cor 5:10).  Esther passed inspection and was accepted as queen (v.17).  Likewise, if we are accepted by Jesus, we shall inherit the Kingdom (Matt 25:34).  As the king proclaimed Esther as his wife (v.18), so will the bride of Christ be made known (Rev 21:9,10).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

2:7 We might infer that Esther’s parents had been killed in the siege of Jerusalem.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

2:16This is one of a number of mentions of months by name in the book of Esther. Tebeth is the 10th month in the Jewish religious calendar. So we see in this book which recounts events in a foreign country that events are recorded according to the Jewish religious, calendar – not even the secular one. Thus we are forced to recognise that the book of Esther, whilst dealing with what seems to be secular matters, is set against a Jewish religious setting


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

Just to set the historical time frame: Esther was taken to Xerxes and became his wife in Dec/Jan of 479 BC (v.16).  This happened one year after Xerxes' fleet suffered a devastating defeat at the hands of the Greeks at the Bay of Salamis.  Xerxes had been warring against the Greeks for over a decade.  However, after his navy's rout in 480 BC, he discontinued trying to defeat the Greeks.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

2:10 The comment that Esther had not shown her nationality at this time sets the scene for Ahasuerus not understanding the implications of what Haman eventually planned.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

2:5 Mordecai’s name means ‘Dedicated to Marduk’ – Marduk being a false god. However despite his name Mordecai was dedicated to Yahweh, the God of Israel.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

PURE AS THE DRIVEN SLUSH

Paul, understanding the short comings of human nature, urges this young brother Titus to stand fast in the word of God and teach by example & doctrine, the right way to live a life in Christ.

We also need this kind of reminder, of how to live Godly lives in a corrupt world, and so much more, as we see the day of Christ's appearing grow closer. Let us take head to these words and conquer ourselves ... rather than the world.


Peter Dulis [toronto west]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

2:19 Mordecai sitting in the king’s gate is not simply stating that he was sitting down. It is an indication of his status in the city. He was amongst the judges of the city.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Amos 7
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Amos 7 online in the King James Version
Listen to Amos 7 online in the New International Version

 

v.15 - to be taken from the flock makes Amos analogous with David - 2Sam.7:8, Psa.78:70-72
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
7:2 That the prophet asks for forgiveness - presumably for the nation - indicates that the destruction that he has been caused to speak of in verse 1 was judgement from God.
7:10 We cannot identify this Amaziah in any of the lists of the priests of the Lord, even though he is called a priest.
This marks that whatever his lineage the Father does not count him as a priest. We know that the priest's lips should keep knowledge. Malachi 2:7 Which is something which Amaziah did not.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.16 - The prophets were a constant stumblingblock to wayward Israel, because they spoke words they did not wish to hear. It is a reminder to us that we should always keep our minds open to hear all that people say, and not to block out that which we are not keen to act upon.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
7:13 Amaziah's command to Amos that he should not prophesy against Bethel shows that the prophet had gone to the set of the false worship for this is one of the site of the calves which Jeroboam 1 had made. Amos had already spoken against Bethel (4:4)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
7:14-15 Amos did not choose the job of being a prophet. It was God's calling which gave him the job - just like David (2 Samuel 7:8). Amos was making the point to Amaziah that the message was not his own but was from God.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
7:4 Notice we have returned to the theme of 'fire' for judgment as we saw in our comment on chapter 1 this year.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.8 Seeing Amos being called by name, reminds us of Paul writing to Timothy "The Lord knoweth them that are his" 2Tim.2:19  and "He calls His own sheep" John 10:3. Also "My sheep hear my voice, and I know them" John 10:27
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
OUT OF THE COMFORT ZONE
 
Wouldn't it be nice if the only people we had to preach to were the ones who agreed with our message and supported us as we proclaimed it?  If that were the case we could sit in our churches with those who feel the same way as us, and encourage each other.  But that is not the way it works.  God wants everyone to have a chance to repent and turn to him, even if they seem like the nastiest people on earth.
 
Amaziah, the priest of Bethel, didn't want to hear God's message from Amos.  He believed that God's word should only be preached to people who wanted to hear it.  That is why he said to Amos, "Get out, you seer!  Go back to the land of Judah. Earn your bread there and do your prophesying there.  Don't prophesy any more at Bethel, because this is the king's sanctuary and the temple of the kingdom." (Amos 7:12-13)
 
Fortunately Amos didn't take any notice of this discouragement and he continued to prophesy in the name of the LORD to the people who most needed to hear the message. Jesus did the same when he preached to the outcasts of society.  They were the ones who needed him.  But among those who hear there will always be those who will violently oppose our message.  Let's be like Amos and get out of our comfort zones to spread the word among the people who need to hear it.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Robert

Now follows 5 visions, starting at Amos 7:1,4,7,Amos 8:1, Amos 9:1.In today’s chapter, the first two visions conclude with the wonderful words that God has taken these punishments away, see Amos 7:3,6. But the 3rd vision is not so. The punishment on the North will not be lifted. There follows then a message against the false priest Amaziah who tried to get Amos to stop preaching, that his own family will come on very hard times, and that he himself will die in a polluted (or unclean) land. I presume that last statement means that the land would be unclean, and forsaken by God.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

7:10 Whereas Amaziah saw Amos as a threat to himself and so spoke to Jeroboam indicating that Amos had conspired against the king in reality Amos’ message was for the benefit of the king. Amaziah, because he was astray from God, could not see this.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

V.10-11 What Amos said was indeed the truth. Amaziah, when reporting to Jeroboam, reported Amos's words incorrectly, either this was done intentionally, or his guilty conscience led him to misunderstand them. We have no record of Amos saying that Jeroboam would die by the sword. What Amos said was that the sword would be drawn against his house (V.9), this was fulfilled in the death of his son Zechariah (2Kin 15:10)   


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

The plumb-line mentioned in v8 is mentioned again in Zech 4:10. Here it has been used to build the temple in Jerusalem. The narrative in Zecheriah goes on to mention the curse which would go out throughout the whole earth: "it shall enter the house of the thief, and the house of the one which swears falsely by My name. It shall remain in the midst of his house and consume it with its timber and stones" (Zech 5:4). If we go back to Amos we find that this is exactly what the house of Israel were doing: "falsifying the scales with deceit" (8:5).

Combining these two "plumb-line" prophecies we can see what Jesus was thinking about when he went into the temple and saw the Jews buying and selling in that house. No doubt the "money changers" mentioned in the gospels were charging an exorbitant exchange rate as Amos 8:5 tells us. Seeing the Jews using the "house" for deceit, he proclaimed the curse upon it from Zech 5:4 "not one stone shall be left upon another" (see Luke 19:43-45). Notice in these verses that the house would be made "level". So what we learn is that Jesus was the plumb-line promised in these prophecies. He was the upright one by which the deeds of others would be measured, and he was the pattern by which the new Temple would be built.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Rob

7:1-2 The sight of caterpillars devouring the crops is reminiscent of the punishment that the prophet has already spoken of – Amos 4:9


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

Amos had two occupations: shepherd; and a gatherer of sycamore fruit (v.14).  The sycamore tree in question is ficus sycamorus.  It is a cross between a fig tree and a mulberry (balsam) tree.  It yields fruit that is inferior to the fig tree.  The ficus sycamorus is the tree that Zacchaeus climbed to see Jesus.  (For further information, please see my note on Luke 19, Sept. 26).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

7:17 Whilst the captivity did not take place in the days of this king of Israel it was soon to come when Hoshea was taken captive by the Assyrian.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.12 Amaziah urged Amos to return to Judah and make a living there. As a prophet of the LORD, Amos earned no pay, but was supported by his own business (v.14). However, the priests of Baal were paid by Jeroboam. Anyone who serves the LORD should not expect their services to become a money-making business. There were corrupt individuals in the first century ecclesia who thought they could make money through religion (Titus 1:10,11). The apostle Paul commanded that believers to extricate themselves from such people (1Tim 6:5). One can reflect on the many Tele-Evangelists today who make huge amounts of money by catering to the feel-good sensibilities of people, without preaching the true gospel. True leaders of Jesus must tell the truth and not expect to make a profit from their services (1Tim 3:2,3,8; Titus 1:7; 1Pet 5:2).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

7:2 We must remember that the prophet, though speaking directly the words of God, had feelings of his own. Here we see Amos praying for the people that he was witnessing against. Do we have the same feeling towards those in darkness?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

INTECESSORY PRAYER

 

Job did it. Moses did it. Daniel did it. Jesus did it. Paul did it. And so did Amos. There were others too. Each of these people prayed to God on behalf of other people. They turned away God's anger, gave God's people a second chance, or prayed for the forgiveness of their fellow man.

 

Amos was shown two visions of what God had planned to happen to Israel. The first was a plague of locusts that stripped the land bare without leaving a scrap of food for all the people of Israel. When he saw it, Amos instinctively cried out, "Soverign LORD, forgive! How can Jacob survive? He is so small!" (Amos 7:2) Amos' cry was heard by God, and because of what he said, God changed his mind. "So the LORD relented. 'This will not happen,' the LORD said." (v.3) The next vision was one of fire spreading through the land consuming everything. Again Amos cried out, "Soverign LORD, I beg you, stop! How can Jacob survive? He is so small!" (v.5) Again, at Amos' request, the LORD changed his mind. "'This will not happen either,' the LORD said." (v.6)

 

Our prayers on behalf of others are heard by God. Like Amos and the many others who interceeded with God on behalf those who couldn't or wouldn't pray for themselves, we can and should pray for each other. Who knows? Maybe our prayer will be the one that makes a difference.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

7:5Again, like in verse :2, we see the prophet appealing for Israel.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Titus  1, 2 and 3
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Titus 1 online in the King James Version Listen to Titus 2 online in the King James Version Listen to Titus 3 online in the King James Version
Listen to Titus 1 online in the New International Version Listen to Titus 2 online in the New International Version Listen to Titus 3 online in the New International Version

 

3 v.1 - The concept of good works is prevalent in this letter. - 2:14, 3:1,8,14 - It is clearly an important aspect of our walk in the way of truth. See also Job 22:2, 35:7,8, 2Cor.9:12-15
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

1:6 - 9 The qualifications of the elders that Titus was to ordain. We might ask how such attributes fit in to ecclesial life today.

1:6 blameless 1 Timothy 3:2
husband of one wife 1 Timothy 3:2
faithful children 1 Timothy 3:4

1:7 blameless 1 Timothy 3:2
not given to wine 1 Timothy 3:3
no striker 2 Timothy 2:24
not greedy of filthy lucre 1 Timothy 3:3

1:8 lover of hospitality 1 Timothy 3:2

1:9 holding fast the faithful word 2 Timothy 1:3

2:14 'peculiar people' is a phrase used twice in the New Testament.
Titus 2:14 peculiar people
1 Peter 2:9 peculiar people

But it has its origins in the Old Testament.
Exodus 19:5 peculiar treasure
Deuteronomy 7:6 special people
Deuteronomy 14:2 26:18 peculiar people
1 Chronicles 29:3 proper good
Psalm 135:4 peculiar treasure
Ecclesiastes 2:8 peculiar treasures
Malachi 3:17 my jewels

If we are God's 'jewels' how do we view our brethren as sisters? Do we value them in the way that we would value precious stones?

3:5 'washing of regeneration' - see Ephesians 5:26 to show that the regeneration is of the Word.
3:6 'shed ...' the same Greek word used Acts 2:17 to speak of the giving of the holy spirit.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Notice the emphasis that Paul makes about the dangers of the 'circumcision'
1:10 14. We might have thought that those who had been brought up on a familiarity with the Scriptures would have led the way in teaching sound doctrine - but is was not so. The Jews, so hide bound by their traditions, wrought havoc with the gentile babes in Christ.

2:10 Whilst we might think the word 'purloining' carries the sense of pilfering or something fairly innocuous we should be aware it is the same word translated 'kept back' (Acts 5:2) so clearly it is a serious, not trivial, matter.

3:9 The 'genealogies' Paul speaks of would relate to the ways that Jews would appeal to their pedigree as if this were some guarantee of spirituality or the correctness of their position. This further reinforces the point we made (Chapter 1)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

1:14 Whilst we are unlikely to give heed to 'Jewish fables' it is quite likely that we will give heed to 'Commandments of men'. We must measure what we hear against the teaching of Scripture.

2:15 That Titus was to 'rebuke with all authority' would indicate that some of the things that he was to 'set in order' (1:5) relate to the issues raised in the previous verses in this chapter. So we may conclude that there were problems with 'aged men' 'aged women' 'young women' 'young men' 'servants' - which indicates problems in every section of the community.

3:12 So Titus was planning to go and visit Paul in prison in Rome. We do not know whether he ever got to Rome to see Paul but the little comment here indicates that was his plan. Small details like this help to fill out our understanding of the lives and activities of individuals in Scripture.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

1:5 Paul left Titus in Crete on his way to Rome (Acts 27:7) when he passed by Crete.

2:10 'fidelity' is actually the word 4102 which is translated 'faith' elsewhere in Titus  (Titus 1:1,4,13 , 2:2, 3:15)

3:12  Nicopolis means 'City of victory'. There were several cities of this name. The one here referred to was most probably that in Epirus, which was built by Augustus Caesar to commemorate his victory at the battle of Actium (B.C. 31) 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
The hope of eternal life: 3:3-8 - (I think the RSV helps to clarify this faithful saying) - For we ourselves were once foolish, disobedient, led astray, slaves to various passions and pleasures, passing our days in malice and envy, hated by men and hating one another; but when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit, which he poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal life. The saying is sure.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles
 3:3 Reflection on our past makes it easier to appreciate what a hopeless situation we all were in before accepting Christ.  
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

1:3 We often say that we have ‘the truth’ and indeed we have. However having ‘the truth’ does not give us licence to ride roughshod over the feelings of others. The ‘truth’ is ‘according to Godliness’.

2:8 ‘Sound speech’ is not speaking about our doctrines correctly, though that would be included. ‘Sound speech’ is speaking in such a way in all aspects of life that those who are opposed to the gospel cannot fault what we say, even though they might like to do so. Rather like the Chaldeans realised that they could not find fault with Daniel’s words even though they disliked him – Dan 6:4

3:9 In encouraging his audience to ‘avoid foolish questions’ Paul is also talking to us. How often do we degenerate into arguing abut things that Scripture is silent upon?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

1:13-14 There comes a time when severe action had to be taken n ecclesial life. However the ‘rebuke’ was designed to restore the one in error. It was not simply a censure that would alienate the one in error.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
3:15 This is a very powerful salutation "All those who are with me send you greetings." All the fellow-workers who are with Paul at this time send greetings to Titus. (It appears that there are more with Paul now than when he wrote the second letter to Timothy.) (2Tim 4:21) "Greet those who love us in faith" Titus is asked to convey the greetings of Paul and of those who are with him to all those who share the same faith and teaching. "Grace be with you all" God's love be upon all the believers in Crete who would have heard this letter read in the first century, and to all true believers who over the centuries have read this letter, that it may fill the hearts of all those with peace and joy.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

 

1:2 God promised eternal life before the world began (KJV); before the beginning of time (NIV).  This is the same language as that found in 2Tim 1:9.  The question is, to whom would God promise eternal life before those stated conditions?  Would that apply to Himself or His angelic host?  I think that the NASB translation makes more sense when it says: long ages ago.  This allows for the promise to be made to the first man (and woman) - which it was.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

1:13     Notice that the brethren were to be ‘sound in the faith’ not ‘sound brethren’ It is the faith. Their presentation of the gospel had to ring true.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

Titus was a Greek convert. He was sent to Crete by Paul to sort out the corrupt influences that had crept into the ecclesia there. The Cretans had a poor reputation in the surrounding areas (1:12). In fact, there emerged an expression, to Cretanize, which was synonymous with to lie.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

Titus 2:12 So Paul taught Titus that we cannot live a monastic life. Rather we have to live the gospel in the world in which we find ourselves.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
In Titus 1:10 there's two types of "insubordinate" teachers mentioned. 1) Idle talkers, and 2) deceivers. The one isn't careful what he's talking about, but says it anyway. The other gives thought to carefully crafted lies. The second might seem much worse that the first, but in both cases the damage is done as soon as the words leave the tip of the tongue. The only remedy, Paul says, is to bung their mouths up (1:11). This is done firstly by a sharp rebuke (1:13), then followed by giving a better example (2:7-8), a second rebuke and finally rejection from the group if they stubbornly continue to be divisive (3:10-11). This might all seem harsh except for when we think of the salvation of the young believers that was at stake.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

3:11 The reason for avoiding endless questioning on things that cannot be answered is that such activity destroys faith.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter