|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 5:14
- The construction in the original language here refers to 'the highest
gallows that can be found' as opposed to gallows of this particular height,
so Haman did not have these gallows built overnight, simply found and made
ready for his use. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch.
5 - Arrogant smug Haman could boast about his wealth and position.
However the situation with Mordecai so ate into him that he had no peace.
Thus we see that wealth and honour are no guarantee of happiness. ch.6 - And so to ensure that His people were preserved - but in a seemingly natural way - the king could not sleep and learnt of Mordecai's kindness to the king. Haman just happened to be around at that time and so got the job of promoting Mordecai to honour. Thus his hatred was intensified. He is being prepared for a great fall. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| ch.6
gives us a wonderful insight into the working of the Lord our God, who invariably
uses the circumstances and the people He has placed in positions of authority
to bring about His purpose. We know this so well, so we can look forward
with assurance to those things which God has promised, however unlikely
it might seem in human terms that they will ever come to pass. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5:3 The promise that the king made to Esther is echoed by Herod to Herodias' daughter (Mark 6:22). The contrast is fascinating. Esther is seeking the head of Haman, the Jew's enemy whereas the daughter of Herodias is seeking the head of a faithful Jew. 6:13 Isn't it interesting that his friends knew that Haman's opposition to a Jew would be fruitless. Were they just superstitious or did they know what God had told Abraham? (Genesis 12:3) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5:7-8 One wonders why Esther did not make her specific request about her people at that time. Maybe it was because she wanted to be sure that Haman was the only one present with her and the king when she made her request lest other issues and court etiquette got in the way of her request for her people being heeded. 6:6 So self centred was Haman that he could not think of anyone else who would be great in the eyes of the king! We might smile at the way that things turned out for Haman but we would do well to reflect on our own attitude when there is work to do. Do we ever feel that we are the only one suitable for the job? Or are we willing to put forward others and to take a back seat ourselves? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5:13 We might think that Haman's problem was that Mordecai would not bow down to him. However it goes a lot deeper than that. We see in his enraged comment here that the problem that Haman had was that he was a "Jew". 6:6,7,9,11 The fourfold repetition of the phrase "the king delighteth to honour" forces us to realise that the king is being placed in a position whereby he will be prepared to sanction Esther's request in the banquet which took place on the next day (Est 6:14) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In Est 5:1 Esther put on her best clothes, and went into appear before the king. But how hungry she must have been! She had fasted for 3 days and nights. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
5:1 - on the 3rd day of fasting Esther puts on her royal robes. 5:2 - she grabs the extended septer. Num 24:17,19 - Christ is the septer and star (the meaning of Esther) and similarly we have to grab on to Christ and hold fast to that which is good. Est 5:8 - she waits till after the 3rd day to petition the king for her life and that of Mordecai's people. Perhaps this was because only then could a symbolic divine approval be assured. 5:11 - we see an example of Haman's arrogance thinking he was the chosen one and in 5:14 he prepares to kill the true man of God Mordecai. Haman has a 50 cubit wooden assembly erected to hang Mordecai. We might note the number 50 is often associated with the Jubilee of mercy to a multitude during when people are delivered or freed from slavery and debts are considered paid in full. 6:11 - faithful Mordecai, the man the king delights to honor, is led through the capital streets on an animal, royally robed, with a small crest on his head like Esther's. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| 5:4 There was great address in this procedure of Esther's, for, by showing such high respect to the king's favorite, she would the better insinuate herself into the royal affections, and gain a more suitable oppertunity of making known her request. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
Haman was an evil person bent on destroying Mordecai and the Jews. But, as we shall see tomorrow, his intended mischief, like that of all perpetrators of evil, will boomerang: He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made. His mischief shall return upon his own head, and his violent dealing shall come down upon his own pate (Psa 7:15,16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
5:3,6 Now Esther, the faithful Jewess organises a ‘banquet’ – so we have another party. However this one was rather different from the one that the king had organised. Whereas his had been one of decadence and excess Esther’s banquet has one simple objective – the salvation of her people. 6:4 One wonders how often Haman was in the king’s court when everyone else was asleep. It is evident that the king could not sleep because of the interference of an angel. So what about Haman? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5:3 Whist the king’s offer to Esther may seem very rash as he had no idea what her request might be his response actually provides what we might call an undersigned support for an earlier comment by Esther. In Est 4:11we learnt that entry into the king’s presence uninvited could bring certain death. The king, knowing this, must have realised that whatever Esther was gong to request must be very important to her that she would risk death. The kings offer, therefore, was not a flippant remark but one designed to put Esther at ease before she made the request. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 5:10 Haman did not openly reveal his hatred for Mordecai. He decided to bide his time until the twelfth month. Inwardly he was full of rage. What had appeared to have been a perfect day had been dampened. However, Haman consoled himself that the wait would not be very long. Soon Mordecai and all his people would be wiped away. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
HUMBLE MYSELF I might not be Haman, I might not even be as full of myself as Haman was, but I have still been caught in the same pride trap as Haman found himself tangled up in. When King Xerxes asked Haman, "What should be done for the man the king delights to honour?" (Est 6:6), Haman's mind thought only of himself. As far as Haman was concerned there was no one else in the whole kingdom that the king would like to honour. Haman's reply to King Xerxes was a self centred one aimed at giving himself the honour that he wanted to have. But the next time the king opened his mouth, it was probably to see Haman's jaw drop to the ground and shock to be plastered all over his face. It was not Haman the king wanted to honour, but Haman's enemy, Mordecai. Thinking of ourselves more highly than we ought will only get us into trouble. There are other people in the world besides us and if our lives become tainted with pride, God will often choose someone else instead of us. Like Haman, at various times I have found myself thinking I am more valuable than I really am, only to find that both God and other people have a different opinion. Isn't it better to do what Jesus said to do and humble ourselves? Then, when God is ready, he can lift us up. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
5:14 That Haman could, on the one hand, countenance murdering Mordecai, and on the other hand go ‘merrily’ to a banquet highlights the evil nature of the man. A man with no conscience. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5:9,13,14 Haman hated Mordecai. Haman was an Agagite (3:1). Agag was the generic name for the Amalek kings, just as Pharaoh was for the Egyptians. And so, Haman was a descendent of Amalek royalty. He would have known his nation’s history, and its interaction with Israel. Saul defeated the Amalekites (1Sam 15:7); then David continued the job (2Sam 1:1); and then the Simeonites mopped up (1Chron 4:43). Only a few Amalekites lived to tell the tale. Haman was, ultimately, one of those. And so, it is no wonder that he hated Modecai the Jew. Little did he know that Esther was Jewish. Surprise! Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
5:9 Haman is completely oblivious to his impending fate. His reasoning is that the only reason why Esther would want only him and the king was that he saw himself as so important – it must never have crossed his mind that this had anything to do with Mordecai and the Jewish people Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
6:14 So the scene has been set – Haman has been humiliated, as he saw it, because of his attitude to Mordecai. Now he, even though doubtless encouraged by the request, is going to his doom! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
2 - The impossibility of escape from the watchful eye of God is often
described in this sort of way - Job
20:6,7, 26:6, Psa.139:7-10, Isa.2:19, 14:16, Jer.49:16, 51:53 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 9:1
- 5 Yahweh was not restricted in what he could do against Israel.
Even if they were taken out of the land He was still able to judge them. This contrasted with the perception of Israel. They viewed Yahweh as a territorial God like the nations round about had many gods. The taking into captivity into Assyria and then the taking of Judah into Babylon subsequently shows that Yahweh was still in control of their lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
reminds us that God has power over all things in His creation. Maybe there
is no such thing as a chance happening. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 9:9-12
Whilst
9:11-12 is used (Acts
15:16) to speak of the call of the gentiles we should not forget that
'all Israel will be saved'. This is indicated with 'I will sift the house
of Israel
' We can take comfort that 'not the least grain will fall
' God knows all His children, whether Jew or gentile. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 9:9
The assurance that when Israel are sifted 'not the least grain shall fall
upon the earth' is a wonderful promise. God knows all of us. The hair of
our head is numbered (Matthew
10:30) Such is our Father's care for us that not one of His children
will be lost or forgotten because of His carelessness. Any loss will be
our own fault. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Amos 9:11-15. Here we see five promises of Israel’s restoration. v.11. Tabernacle of David restored. v.12. Israel to possess the remnant of Edom. v.13. Abundance of food. v.14. Captivity of Israel to return. v.15. Israel never to be removed. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 9:15 Despite all the pronouncements of judgment and captivity there is a message of hope. The restoration of the nation - for ever - in their own land. Of course this will before a repentant nation. However it will happen. So we see the everlasting mercy of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.15 The LORD promised to plant Israel so firmly and securely in their own land that they would never again be uprooted from the land that the LORD has given them (Jer 24:6). The surity of the prophecy, so frequenty denied, is guaranteed by the words "saith the LORD thy God" John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
The symbolism of striking the lintel (tops of the pillars) for destruction ( v.1) contrasts with the striking of the lintel for salvation (Exo 12:22,23).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Despite terrible prophecies directed mainly against the North, Amos’ words conclude with a time of blessing. Amos 9:11-15 speaks of a time of return, building and plenty. God’s people will be planted in their Promised Land, and be no more pulled up. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
9:8 Amos is very specific. Remember he has been speaking against Israel, the Northern kingdom. He now says that the Northern kingdom will be destroyed but the kingdom of Judah would not be completely destroyed. This is exactly what happened. Assyria took the Northern kingdom away and it ceased to exist. The Babylonians took Judah away but Judah and Benjamin returned during the time of Ezra and new. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.5 Amos had threatened that at no time and nowhere could the Israelites be safe from the judgements of God, he now shows them God's omnipotent power to execute His threats. So in the case of the threat in yesterday's reading (Amos 8:8). God's power is shown to be the cause of mourning of "all that dwell" in the land, and of its rising "like a flood", and of its being "drowned, as by the flood of Egypt" John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
Verses 2-4 tell us in no uncertain terms that there's no way of running away and hiding from God, yet what is presented as a desperate situation in these verses is presented as a blessing in Psa 139:7-12. What we are being told is that the same situation can be bleak for one person and delightful for the next. In this case, the ability of God to find us out is presented as an absolute fact, yet depending on our relationship with God we either gain immense comfort from this or immense fear. This principle is given to us in many examples throughout scripture, the main two being Israel at Mount Sinai in Exodus, and Jesus in the gospel of John. In both cases it was the presence of the glory of God which separated between the just and the unjust. At Sinai it was the darkness and thunder which scared some, yet caused others to draw near. In John it was the light of Jesus' message which caused some to draw near and others to feel condemned. These two examples are pulled together in Heb 12:18-25 where we are asked in v25 to hear Him who speaks (Jesus). In John we are told that it is our response to hearing the words of Jesus that will condemn or save us (John 5:24, 12:48). These words are words which lay bare our innermost thoughts, intentions, and motivation like nothing else can (John 4:12). Only if we have a clear concience through faith in Christ can we bear to draw near to God and hear this word. So we can see that it is our conscience which will put us in one group or another, either to fear or love the all seeing eyes of God, and it is by that concience that we will be saved or condemned (Heb 10:22). The practical lesson in this is that we should start listening to our concience. If we find ourself drawing back from the word of God rather than drawing near, it may be that we need to urgently re-evaluate our relationship with Him. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
9:4 The promise that they would go into captivity ad the sword would kill them is a quotation of the curses in Lev 26:33. This is the last of a number of quotations from Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 in the prophecy of Amos showing them that the curses for disobedience were being fulfilled upon them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.9:13-15 gives a wonderful picture of the bounty that is in store in the Kingdom. Compare v.13 with Psa 72:16; v.14 with Mic 4:4; v.15 with Isa 65:22. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
9:14 Amidst all the words of doom and captivity a ray of hope is held out. There would be a return. But clearly from the words that the prophet has spoken already that return is conditional upon repentance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Amos 9:11-15 - V.11 David's tent/tabernacle/house restored; V.12 Gentiles being called too (as Peter Forbes noted in his 2002 comments); V.13 ["new wine" NIV or "sweet wine" KJV from Heb. "aciyc" (6071) meaning "fresh grape juice" or "anything pressed on, mead"] and this sweet wine, sometimes connected with blood (Isa 49:26), is connected to a future millenial age when the Lord will reign in Zion (Joel 3:13-18,21) - We read this Amos account in Acts 15:13-19 and how it relates to the call of the Gentiles. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
9:13 The picture of abundant harvests is a glimpse of the fulfilment of Lev 26:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 2
v.5-7 - The significance of quoting Psa. 8 here is furthered by a consideration
of the first part of the Psalm. Psa.8:1
- God has set His glory above the heavens - surely a reference to the return
of Jesus and the future kingdom. It is the glory in Jesus that is referred
to, which of course is borne out by the rest of Heb.2. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The main
argument of chapter 1 is that God has spoken now by his supreme prophet
- Jesus so we should give careful heed to what he said. Chapter 2 focuses on the reason why Jesus was made 'a little lower than the angels'. Through his life and death Jesus developed the rapport which enables him to be a faithful pries now. A theme which the writer returns to regularly through the letter. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:6 Firstbegotten - quoting Psalm 89:27 ties the risen Christ into the promises to David. A link we understand but here is Scriptural evidence. 2:10 Is saying that Jesus was 'made perfect through sufferings' we are introduced to the relevance of the humanity of Jesus which in turn will be used to highlight the purpose of chastening in our lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:13-14 The use of Psalm 110:1 and Psalm 104:4 to compare the status of Jesus and the status of angels after the resurrection of Jesus is interesting. 2:16 Whilst Jesus was of the same nature as those he came to save the Spirit, quoting Isaiah 41:8, has Jesus as 'the seed of Abraham' to show the Jews that Jesus came to fulfil the promises to Abraham. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:3 In describing Jesus as 'the brightness of his glory' quoting Eze 1:28 we are being shown the exalted status of the risen lord Jesus Christ. 2:15 The 'bondage' referred to which was a consequence of the fear of death was humanity - alienated from fellowship with God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2:1 The difference between hearing and listening may be acute. To hear may mean merely to perceive sounds that do not necessarily require or create action. To listen means to pay thoughtful attention to sounds that enter the ear, and as a result generate a positive action. A child may be told by his parents to do something and ignores it, he heard it, but failed to listen; There was no action. The writer to the Hebrews says that we all must direct our minds towards listening attentively to the Word of God. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
1:2 worlds (KJV), universe (NIV) refers to the messianic age and not to the universe as Trinitarians would have us believe. Christ is the leader of a new spiritual generation (1Cor 15:20; 2:10 ). The gospel is the recognition of Christ as being at the center of his kingdom accompanied by this new spiritual generation (Acts 8:12). Those destined to be with Christ share the same purpose with him (2:11). If we were to take this passage in the same way as Trinitarians link Christ to God: Christ and His brethren are one; and Christ and God are one; then God, Christ, and His brethren are one. Trinitarians, perhaps, would claim that this is syllogistic. Indeed, the link, as it relates to person is untrue, but true as it relates to purpose. Trinitarians confuse these two entities.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| The popular notion that everyone has a guardian angel is dispelled in 1:14. Only those who have believed the true gospel and have been baptized into the saving Name of Jesus are covenanted with the LORD (Acts 8:12). Those thus covenanted are granted angelic help in their walk to the Kingdom. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:14 Having emphasised the exalted status of Jesus - more excellent than angels – we are now reminded that the angels do have a job – ministering to us. 2:3 Continuing the point made in November this year we see that it was not a matter of preference whether one trusted the law of Moses or the sacrifice of Jesus – it was a matter of life and death. The choice was as stark as that. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Scripture plainly states that Jesus was a flesh-and-blood human being (2:14; 1Tim 2:5). Some so-called Christians believe that Jesus was actually the archangel Michael. The apostle Paul says that the worshipping of angels is a false practice (Col 2:18). According to 1:5 Jesus could not have been an angel. Scritpture tells us that angelic angels are immortal (Luke 20:36). Jesus died, which showed that he was mortal and not immortal. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
2:14 ‘he also himself’ highlights Jesus’ commitment to service which qualified him for priesthood – Heb 5:2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:14 ‘power of death’ quotes Hos 13:14 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The LORD spoke to men through His prophets (Amos 3:7). And now, he speaks through the greatest prophet of all, His Son Jesus. This is a ringing endorsement of Jesus’ authority. 2:11 Jesus and His brethren (collective noun meaning brothers and sisters) are one (spiritually). Given that, should not those who call themselves brethren of Christ act like they are a unity? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:11 That which is to ‘perish’ quoting Isa 51:6 is the system of worship according to the Law of Moses. The context of Isaiah 51 shows this. Notice they are to be ‘changed (Heb 1:12The writer will later – Heb 7:12 show what is to be changed is the priesthood which brings about a necessity for the law to be changed also. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Angels (lesson 20 of 20 from "Outline of Basic Bible Teachings" by Wes Booker) I. Old Testament - MALAK = messenger or agent. New Testament - AGGELOS = messenger or agent. "Angel of heaven (or God)" = always His IMMORTAL messengers. "Angel" can be mortal or immortal messengers, depending on context. II. The immortal angels A. They do God's will - Psa 103:20-21; 104:4 (KJV) B. They minister to us - Heb 1:13-14;Psa 34:6-7 C. They also bring God's destruction on evil - 2Sam 24:15-17;Psa 78:49 D. They will be with Christ at his second coming to gather the elect and participate in the judgment - Matt 24:30-31;25:31;13:47-50 E. In appearance they look human, and are fequently mistaken for men, e.g. in the experiences of Abraham (Gen 18;19:1-5), Joshua (Josh 5:13-15) and Manoah (Judg 13:9-23). See Heb 13:2 and compare Gen 18 & 19:1-29. F. One of the promises to the faithful - to be like the angels and die no more - Luke 20:34-36 G. Although immortal and therefore incapable of sinning, there are things that they do not know (unlike God) - Mark 13:32;1Pet 1:10-12;Gen 22:9-12 H. Only two referred to by name: 1.) Gabriel ("strength of God") - mentioned on 3 occasions: Dan 8,9; and Luke 1 2.) Michael ("who is like God?") - mentioned on 4 occasions: Dan 10,12;Jude 1;Rev 12 III. The word is used of human messengers - Mal 2:7;3:1;Matt 11:7-10;Luke 7:18-24;9:51-53;James 2:25. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| All the chapters of Hebrews are part of one long discourse by Paul on how we might be saved, not by direct inheritance gained by belonging to the family of Israel, but by inheriting what has been given to Jesus. The parable of the prodigal son is helpful here, because having squandered all his own inheritance, this son returned home to live from his brother's share (see Luke 15:12). We also can only inherit part of Jesus's share, not our own, which he is willing to share with us if we are his brothers (Heb 2:11). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
2:18 ‘succour them’ quotes Isaiah 49:8 where the context shows that God provided Jesus to confirm a ‘covenant’ which brought about freedom (from sin and death) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||