November 3

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 2Chronicles  32
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 2Chronicles 32 online in the King James Version
Listen to 2Chronicles 32 online in the New International Version

 

v.7 - Familiar words to those God cares about - Deut.31:6,7,23, Josh.1:6-9, 1Chron 28:10,20, Isa.35:4, Dan.10:19
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
32:8 In saying 'but with us is the Lord God' Hezekiah is echoing the words of the prophet who was his great counsellor - Isaiah 8:10. Hezekiah must have taken great comfort from the way in which Isaiah spoke to him.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.5 - Because of the succinct way in which these histories are written we find ourselves without much sense of the time that things took. Here, however, it was clear that this Assyrian threat remained for some considerable time, and still did not apparently develop into war. One wonders how many more times we read of an event which we assume was shortlived, but in fact was quite prolonged.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
32:1 These events took place in the 14th year of Hezekiah (2 Kings 18:13) As he reigned 29 years we must realise that Manasseh had not been born yet. This explains, in part, his anxiety about his illness (v24)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
32 Notice the way that the king of Assyria speaks of his hand (:11,13,14,15 twice ,17 twice) which seems to be an attempt to rebut the words of Hezekiah :8 with him is an arm of flesh.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

V.31 Here we have a lesson for each one of us. Hezekekiah's offense was not so much in the display of his military stores and treasures, as in not giving to God the glory both of the miracle and of his recovery.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
God saved Judah and Hezekiah, their king, because of his Godliness recounted in the previous 3 chapters. But the Lord didn't save Israel when in a few chapters' time they had turned their back on Him.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

V.9 The consequences of Hezekiah's earlier distancing himself from the influence of Assyria are now being realized.  Sennacherib sent spokesmen to taunt Hezekiah in Jerusalem while he laid siege to Lachish. 

Lachish was located about 20 miles (32 km) south-west of Jerusalem.  Pictures of Sennacherib's successful campaign in Lachish were carved in the wall of his palace in Nineveh.  These carvings are now in the British Museum.  Sennacherib took Lachish in 700 BC.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

32:31  In saying that God left Hezekiah "to try him" we are seeing the recurrence of the way that God works with his people. For example Deut 8:3 speaking to Israel in the wilderness. If God were to hedge His servants about all the time so that they were never tempted then the servant would never learn his own strengths and weaknesses.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

v 1  the start of this verse mentions "..all that Hezekiah had so faithfully done...", & yet God then brings not one, but two, difficult tests on him - the Assyrians, & his life-threatening illness. We are reminded of Job, a righteous man Job 1:8 but who needed further character refining.

The way the narrative runs, it would appear that the threat to Jerusalem & the illness of Hezekiah are consecutive. Isaiah however, would seem to indicate that they were concurrent Isa 38:5,6

The pride of Hezekiah in showing off his wealth, reminds one of the pride of Nebuchadnezzar Dan 4:30

 


Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Wendy

32:1 ‘After these things’ – an ominous phrase. Hezekiah had done so many things right. And now God is developing more ‘fruit’ in Hezekiah by providing a challenge for him to deal with that he might learn more about himself and learn even more to trust his God. We should not think that because we are doing things right that life will be easy. Rather, if Jesus words – John 15:2 - are to be understood we see that God seeks more fruit from those whoa re fruitful.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

Vs.2-6 Hezekiah realized that war with Assyria was inevitable. Instead of moping around, or throwing up his hands, he set about preparing for it. But he did it with the knowledge that Yahweh would be with him and his people (vs.7,8).

In this example, Hezekiah shows the working relationship (partnership) one should have with Yahweh. It is our job to implement a process in accordance with Yahweh's will, then He will advance success (1Cor 3:7).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

32:5 The building of the wall that Hezekiah is involved in here is spoken of by the prophet – Isa 22:9-10


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

32:31 Whilst the record says that with respect to the ambassadors of Babylon ‘God left’ Hezekiah the contemporary prophet Micah (4:1 warns of the impending Babylonian captivity – doubtless after the visit of the ambassadors.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.1 Sennacherib (704-682 BC) succeeded his father Sargon. Sennacherib means Sin (the moon goddess) increases brothers.

Sennacherib’s first campaign was against Babylon in 704 BC. He successfully defeated Merodach-baladan, who fled the country. Sennacherib installed Belibus as his viceroy.

Then, in 700 BC Sennacherib turned his attention towards the west, conquering many lands. He captured many Judean towns, and then set his sights on Jerusalem.

V.5 Millo was a defensive wall which was originally built by the Jebusites when they occupied Jerusalem (Jebus).

Vs.14,15,17 In the Ancient Near East, if a nation were successful in overcoming another, then the victory was accredited to the god of the winning side. Assyria had won all its campaigns and had become puffed up with pride and confidence. And so, the Assyrians were convinced that their god, Assur, must be invincible.

V.21 There were 185,000 Assyrians slain (2Kin 19:35). Sennacherib returned home, and one day, when he was worshipping in the temple of Nisroch, his sons killed him (2Kin 19:37).

Nisroch had the head of an eagle and the body of a man (similar to Dagon, the Philistine god, which was half-fish and half-man). Some commentators identify Nisroch with Assur, the Assyrian national god.

V.25 Hezekiah had become proud of heart, encouraged by men and earthly riches rather that Yahweh (See 2Kin 20:12,13).

V.26 Hezekiah was relieved that he would not be subject to punishment. This makes Hezekiah sound very selfish (2Kin 20:19).

V.32 Hezekiah pleaded to Yahweh when he was sick, and Yahweh extended his life by 15 years (2Kin 20:5,6). It was during the 15 years that Manasseh was born. He was the most evil king in Israel’s history, and was the focus of retribution to Jerusalem and Judah (Jer 15:3,4).

Had Hezekiah not pleaded for life, Manasseh would never have been born. Let us be careful for what we ask. We could be given something that we might later regret.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

32:11-16 Notice the emphasis ‘mine’ in these verses showing the self importance of the king of Assyria.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

2Chron 32:3-4 - Hezekiah's tunnel was cut through 1750 feet of solid limestone, was 4 to 20 feet high, saved Jerusalem's water supply and was discovered in 1880; V.3 "fountains" [Heb. "ayin" (5869) means "eye, fountain (i.e. eye of landscape)'], V.4 "fountains" [Heb. "ma'yan" (4599) means "spring, a fountain"].

2Chron 32:22,24 - like Christ, Hezekiah was surrounded by Gentiles (Psa 22:16;Matt 27:54) and ill at the point of death but God delivered him.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Daniel 12
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Daniel 12 online in the King James Version
Listen to Daniel 12 online in the New International Version

 

v.2 - We tend to think of this concept of resurrection as being primarily a NT one, but this is not true. It has been there, quite explicitly, from the outset. Gen 3:15, Job 19:25-27, Isa.26:19, Eze 37:1-4,12, Hos.13:14
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
12:1 The time of trouble is quoted by Jesus (Matthew 24:21) however Jesus also quotes it again (Revelation 16:18) so whilst there was a fulfilment of these words in AD 70 there is yet to be a further fulfilment when the Lord returns. Of course in AD 70 the disciples would have realised that Daniel's words were not fulfilled completely as there had not been the resurrection spoken of (12:2)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.3 gives a wonderufl picture of the great education which will take place in the millennium age of Jesus' reign. It is of great comfort to us to know that we can be involved in that. Let us keep working in God's vineyard now, knowing that this will be the way of our life for ever.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
12:2 Many might think that the doctrine of the resurrection is a New Testament doctrine. Clearly there is much Old testament evidence that it is also an Old Testament doctrine - the New testament then continuing the teaching of the Old. The words here are probably the clearest indication of the resurrection being a tie of separation of the faithful from the unfaithful in the whole of the Old Testament.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
12:6-7 We have already met the "man clothed in linen" in Dan 10:5
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.1 At that time Daniel's people, ( both nateral and spiritual Israel) shall be delivered, and their names shall be found written in the book of life. What a wonderful day that will be when we hear those wonderful  words of the judge "well done thou good and faithful servent"
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Vs.4,9 Daniel was told to seal the words of his prophecy until the time of the end.  The time of the end began in the first century.  Nobody since Daniel until the end of the first century was able to unseal the book (about 600 years).  Only one person was capable of doing that, the risen Lord Jesus (Rev 5:1-5). 

Through Rev. Ch's 6-8, Jesus reveals that the seven seals are seven historical time periods spanning the first century until His return.  Daniel Ch. 12 is talking about the time of Christ's return.  It continues where Daniel Ch 11 leaves off. 

The confederacy of Gog invades Israel, bent upon its destruction (Ch. 11 c.f. Eze 38). The judgement will have taken place and the accepted ones, the Redeemed, will have been immortalized (v.2).  Jesus and the Redeemed will save Israel by destroying Gog and its confederates.

It important to understand what a large body of Christians believe concerning Daniel Ch. 12. They believe that time of v.1 refers to the Great Tribulation which will last three-and-a-half years (being the second half of the Tribulation of seven years). 

During the time of Tribulation, the Antichrist will establish himself in Jerusalem claiming to be ruler of the world.  This idea of the Antichrist, being a Jew who would set himself in Jerusalem as the king of the world, had its beginnings in the Catholic Counter-reformation. 

The Catholic Church at that time was being singled out as the beast and whore of Revelation, and the Pope as the man of sin and the false prophet.  They displaced this criticism by claiming that these things were talking about an Antichrist who will arise. 

Thus, when Christ appears in Jerusalem, claiming to be the king of the world, He will be denounced and opposed by millions of Christians who will see their prophecy coming true.  However, the Lord Jesus will destroy them (Rev 19:19,20). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael
With the Lord Jesus back on the earth, the resurrection will take place, then the judgement, and then the most wonderful reign of Christ.  “How long will it be before all this happens?” Daniel asked. The answer is difficult to understand, but is summarised in Dan 12:13, “You will sleep, Daniel. But don’t worry, you’ll be raised from death, and live for ever in the kingdom.”  This was indeed a lovely promise to the captive prophet. “You will stand in your lot at the end of the days.” If lot means inheritance, then Daniel was comforted by the fact that when he wakes from death he will no longer be a captive – too old to return from Babylon with Zerubbabel. He will be back in his home country, for good. I hope, please God, that I’ll be there too.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

12:3  These words were spoken in Babylon. Daniel was taught in all the wisdom of Babylon. Yet that wisdom did not reveal to him the things of God. The wise spoken of here are those who have immersed themselves in the Word of God, not the word of men.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

12:4 the running ‘to and fro’ echoes the way that God’s eye ran to and fro – 2Chron 16:9 helping us to understand that the running to and fro here is in the pursuit of information.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

12:10 The wicked who do wickedly provides the basis for Rev 22:11. Despite the wisdom of God and the manifestation of His glory there are always men and women who prefer to ignore all of that and continue n their wickedness.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.2 The sequence of events should be noted: 

First the dead shall rise (1Thess 4:15). Then, those living as well as those who were dead will be judged.

Then, those found acceptable will then be with the Lord Jesus as He puts down His enemies who have invaded Israel.

Finally, He will defeat the Great Apostasy, those who oppose Him as the antichrist. Then, peace will ensue as the kingdom period begins.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

12:3 The Chaldeans were really besotted with ‘wise’ things – they had ‘wise men’ and astrologers’ to call on when there was a need for an explanation. However in things to do with God’s plan the book of Daniel shows them to be impotent. Daniel was ‘wise’ Dan 1:7. The wisdom of God is counted as foolish but the wisdom of the things of God makes us wiser than all the wise men in the earth.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
Dan 12:11;Matt 24:15;Mark 13:14.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

 

V.1 We have entered that time of trouble. The political, financial, and social earthquakes that we are experiencing give testimony to Daniel’s words. We can expect the situation to deteriorate further.

And so, we should be putting our houses in order to withstand the turbulence (Luke 6:47-49).

If we overcome the world’s storms we will be found written in the book. This is the book of life (Rev 3:5).

V.5 There stood one angel on one bank of the Tigris, and another angel on the other bank. What is the implication of this arrangement? Could Yahweh be saying that He has covered all contingencies (sides) in divine care for His children?

V.7 A time, times, and half a time can be understood as three-and-a-half years or 1260 days. On a day-for-a-year principle that means 1260 years.

This verse is referencing the little horn of Dan 7:25. There is no doubt that this is talking about the antichrist - the papal influence that would arise to persecute the saints. The problem is fixing the date with regard to 1260 years.

One of the most interesting dates is 606 AD. At this time, Mohammed was beginning his Islamic movement. Some commentators have called this the Eastern Apostasy, because Islam is at odds with the Gospel of Jesus.

At the same time, in 606 AD, Phocas made the grant to the bishop of Rome, whence he assumed the title, The Universal Pastor (Jamieson). Thus, the Antichrist was installed on his lofty throne.

V.11 The daily sacrifice was taken away by Antiochus Epiphanes in 167 BC (See Dan 11:31). But, Jesus makes reference to Daniel in relation to Titus and the destruction of the temple in 70 AD (Matt 24:15).

Again, it is difficult to place dates with regard to the 1290 and the 1335 days. Some have suggested that this applies (in days) to the time between Antiochus’ taking away the sacrifice in 167 BC and his death in 164 BC. It sort of fits, but not precisely.

However, if the day-for-a year principle is applied, then we are talking about 1290 years and 1335 years. But, where is the starting point?

V.13 This is Yahweh’s confirmation that Daniel will be in the Kingdom.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

12:7 we came across a man in ‘linen’ in Eze 9:2 these men were for the deliverance of the faithful. Likewise here. We should remember that the words of Ezekiel were spoken to those in captivity. Daniel, now near the end of the captivity, sees men in linen as deliverers also.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Acts  13
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Acts 13 online in the King James Version
Listen to Acts 13 online in the New International Version

 

v.15 - Do we treat visitors to our meetings with this attitude? Are we too set in our ways?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
13:34 The quotation 'I will give you the sure mercies of David' Isaiah 55:3 shows the importance of David in the purpose of God. Whilst we emphasise, rightly, the place of Abraham in the purpose of God it is instructive to look for the way in which the promises to David are developed in the New Testament
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
13:34 The quotation 'I will give you the sure mercies of David' Isaiah 55:3 shows the importance of David in the purpose of God. Whilst we emphasise, rightly, the place of Abraham in the purpose of God it is instructive to look for the way in which the promises to David are developed in the New Testament
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:45 The 'envy' seen here is typical of the Jew's reaction to Jesus and the preaching of his name (Matthew 27:18, Acts 5:17)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
13:45 A further comment on 'envy' God had told Israel that he would provoke them to envy by a strange nation (Deut 32:21) So we see that God had in mind the call of the gentiles after Israel's rejection of Messiah right back at the end of the wilderness for that is when Deuteronomy was written.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.46 This does not mean that Paul and Barnabus would no longer preach to the Jews only, In turning to the Gentiles, they had in mind the poeple of Antioch. This same turning to the Gentiles would take place wherever it should be thought necessary to do so. The point to note is, that the door was not shut to the Jews by Paul. In Athens Paul told the Jews that he was turning to the Gentiles; Acts 18:6 Paul preached to both Jew and Gentile in Ephesus. Acts 19:9 The Gospel was to be preached to all nations in all the world.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
V.6 Luke here uses a triple description which is characteristic of his style; "sorceror; false prophet; and Jew.". He uses the same style in timorrow's reading, Acts 14:8 "a man impotent in his feet; a cripple from his mother's womb; had never walked." The triple character of a discription makes us to take note of exactly what he is saying.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

13:44  The fact that the Apostle preached to the gentiles on ‘the next Sabbath’ indicates, as suggested in May this year, that gentiles were regular attendees at the synagogue.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

V.23 We note here, that the promise was "unto Israel". The promise was to David as King of Israel. Jesus came to Israel, and not to other nations. This agrees with the statement by Jesus "salvation is of the Jews"(John 4:22). Paul is speaking to those who he addressed as "Men of Israel". They had not yet turned to the Gentiles (V.46)


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

v 11 Paul causes Elymas to be blind, the same thing which had happened to him at his conversion. Does the phrase "for a time", also imply that Elymas would be healed, & be spiritually healed/converted as well?

 


Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Wendy

13:7  The ‘deputy’ had a choice to make. Did he believe the teaching of Paul or the sorcery of Elymas. As always that is the choice. To believe the gospel or the works of the flesh.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
13:22 "A man after my heart" Although Paul stated that God said this, we have no record  in scripture that God did say these words about His servant David.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

13:47 The use of Isa 49:6 is interesting because a prophecy which seems to have its application specifically to Jesus is applied to the believers. They were the light to the gentiles as Jesus was. This highlights an important issue of God manifestation. The way we live either shows God’s glory to others or not. The choice is ours.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.20 seems to contradict 1Kin 6:1. The text should read from v.17 to the beginning of v.20. That is, from the time of the covenant with Abraham until the time of the judges, being 450 years.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

13:22 In saying ‘I have found David’ Paul is quoting Psa 89:20 and so his exposition to these Jews shows the importance of the promises to David to an understanding of the work f God in Messiah


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.4 This began Paul’s first missionary journey (out of three).

V.9 This is the first time that the name Paul is recorded. Saul (Hebrew Shaul meaning asked, sought), the first king of Israel, was sought out to be the monarch (1Sam 10:21).

Saul in the New Testament was sought out by Jesus to work for Him (Acts 9:15). After taking Christ’s commission Saul used his Roman name Paul (Latin Paulus meaning little). Perhaps, the new name signified to him humility as being not only new to the Truth, but also as being a former persecutor (1Cor 15:9). In 1 Cor 15:9 the word least (Greek elachistos) means short (smallest in size and dignity). The name Paul fits this description


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

13:25  In speaking of John ‘fulfilling his course’ we see language that one might associate with the work of a priest – Luke 1:8-


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter