|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.5
Clearly Jehoiakim should have had the throne anyway, being older, though
apparently it takes an Egyptian Pharaoh to come in and sort this out. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 36:13
Notice that hard heartedness is first seen in Pharaoh Exodus
4:21 7:3,13 8:15,32 9:12,34 10:1,20,27 11:10 14:4,8 So when it is
used to speak of how Israel behaved the message is very pointed. You are
being like the oppressing Egyptians from whom you have been delivered.
Deuteronomy
15:7 2 Chronicles 36:13 Psalm 95:8 Isaiah 63:17 Mark 10:5 16:14 John 12:40
Romans 2:5 36:22 Cyrus is called Cyrus king of Babylon on only one occasion 2 Chronicles 36:22 23 Ezra 1:1 2 7 8 3:7 4:3 5 14 17 6:3 14 Ezra 5:13 Cyrus king of Babylon Isaiah 44:28 45:1 Daniel 1:21 6:28 10:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.4
- There is a simple significance in the changing of this name. Eliakim =
"Whom God will raise up" and Jehoakim = "Whom God has raised
up". It is an understandable change! But the interesting thing is that
it was effected by the King of Egypt. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 36:22
The mention of Cyrus in this verse indicates that this part, at least, of
the book of Chronicles was written at the time of the return from Babylon
or even later. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| This
chapter is sad. It describes the final death throes of the kingdom of God
on earth. Notice the strict father - son descent of the king of Judah is
now lost as different kings are put in place by different powers because
of their own political ends. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 36:21 The word of Jeremiah that was to be fulfilled was Jer 25:9-11 amongst other prophecies he spoke. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The very good news in the last 2 verses of this book, tells us that God's prophecy through Jeremiah came true, and Judah was released from their captivity (2Chron 36:22,23). The Jews had to be back in their land before Jesus was born. God really does rule "in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever He will"(Dan 4:25)
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.6 Shortly after Josiah's death at Megiddo, Nebuchadnezzar defeated Pharaoah Necho at Carchemish in 605 BC. The Babylonians were now supreme while the Assyrians and Egyptians took a back seat. In the same year Nebuchadnezzar's first invasion of Jerusalem took place. Jehoiakim became the first Babylonian captive. Then, about seven years after Josiah's death, the Babylonians conquered Jerusalem (598 BC) and sent exiles to Babylon. Eleven years later (587 BC) they destroyed the city. During that turbulent eighteen year span, four kings had office. The first three came and went quickly, the fourth, Zedekiah, reigned eleven years (v.11) before being dragged to Babylon in disgrace. Josiah was spared seeing these awful events, according to prophecy (34:28). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
36 We are reading about the kingdom of God, though we might be forgiven for thinking that it was the kingdom of men. :1 the people made Jehoahaz king. :4 The king of Egypt made Eliakim king. :10 Nebuchadnezzar made Zedekiah king. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
It was as a result of Josiah's own stubborness in fighting Pharaoh, that the final downfall of Judah came about, even though it was God's will that the end would come. Pharaoh uses the occasion of his defeat of Josiah to, 3 months later, depose Jehoahaz & subjugate the kingdom to Egypt. Jehoahaz & Zedekiah had the same mother 2Kin 23:31, 24:18 , although there was about 13 yrs difference in their ages, & these 2 are therefore possibly the kings referred to in Eze 19 Jeremiah's words are here endorsed as being inspired by God. v 12,22
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
36:22-23 The language of these verses is replicated in Ezra 1:13marking the seamless continuity between the end of 2 Chronicles and Ezra. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
36:13 Even though he had been given a place on the throne by the king of Babylon Zedekiah rebelled – but not so that he could serve God. The foolish man wanted to replace oppression by the Babylonians by his own sinfulness! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The quick succession of Judean kings was, of course, orchestrated by Yahweh. Ironically, it was the invader Nebuchadnezzar who was taught to realize this fact (Dan 5:21). These kings were instrumental in bringing the downfall of Jerusalem and Judah, but they were not the essential reason. It was the sin of Manasseh that prompted Yahweh to vow retribution (Jer 15:4). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
36:1 Notice that whilst the people made Jehoahaz king Judah is going to lose control of its own affairs for it was the ‘king of Egypt’ that made Eliakim king – 36:4 and then Nebuchadnezzar who made Zedekiah king – 36:10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2Chron 36:6 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment 5. Judah (the Southern Kingdom) continued for another 200 years after Israel, the Northern Kingdom and the last king was Zedekiah. It was overtured three times (prophesied Eze 21:25-27), then to remain desolate for many years Hos 3:4. - The first overturning was in BC 606 in Jehoiakim's reign. (Prophesied Jer 27:6) 2Kin 24:2, Dan 1:1, 2Chron 36:6. - The second overturning was in BC 597 in Jehoiachin's reign 2Kin 4:10, 2Chron 36:10. - The third overturning was in BC 587 in Zedekiah's reign. (Prophesied Jer 21:7, Jer 34:2) Jer 38:28, Jer 39:1,2, Jer 52:4-5, Eze 24:1-2, 2Kin 25:2, 2Chron 36:7. 6. The Jews were taken into captivity in Babylon 2Kin 24, 2Kin 25 to last for 70 years. (Prophesied Jer 25:8,12) 2Chron 36:20-21. Jerusalem was desolate. Neh 2:12-15. Go to Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
V.1 Jehoahaz means whom the Lord sustains. V.4 Eliakim means raised up by God. Jehoiakim means whom Yahweh sets up. Jehoahaz was taken to Egypt where he died (Jer 22:10-12). Estimates for Jehoiakim’s eleven year reign vary from 610-599 BC to 608-597 BC.V.9 Jehoiachin means appointed by Yahweh. Jehoiachin was a also known as Coniah (Jer 22:24); and Jechoniah (Mal 1:11,12). V.11 Zedekiah means justice of Yahweh. He was Judah’s last king whose eleven-year reign was from 599 BC to 588 BC. V.22 This was in 538 BC. V.23 This was in 536 BC. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
36:15 sent to them by his messengers is quoted by Jesus – Matt 21:34 – in the parable of the wicked husbandmen. His hearers would recognise the origins of Jesus’ words and see the implications. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2Chron 36:6 - KJV reads "...bound 'him in fetters"' [(5178) Heb. "nechosheth" means "fetters of copper or bronze; copper or bronze; base metal"]; given some feel bronze indicates the flesh it could suggest being in bondage to the flesh. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.11
Consider the following passages in this context - Prov.6:32,
20:1, 23:27-35, Isa.5:12, 28:7, Luke 21:34, Rom 13:11-13 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:1
Lord hath a controversy Micah 6:2 At the
border of the land, in the plains of Moab, Israel made a covenant with
Yahweh, saying 'amen' to all that he said. The 'amen' is found repeatedly
in Deuteronomy 27. Yahweh throughout the preheats utilises the language
of the covenant to demonstrate that Israel's behaviour is a demonstration
of the fact that they have broken the covenant. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.7
- This lesson is repeated over and over again in the whole of the scriptures.
Time after time we are reminded by the example of Israel just how easy it
is for us to drift away and take the glory for that which we do to ourselves.
Let us remember - let us remind ourselves every day when we pray, that it
behoves us to give the glory for what we might term our own achievements
to God, who has achieved those things for us. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Notice
in last year's comments the way in which the language in Hosea matches that
in the contemporary prophets - a fruitful area to review when trying to
clarify what Hosea is speaking about.
4:10 The quotation from Leviticus 26:26 should have taught Israel that they were astray from God. As the curses were coming upon them it must be that they were astray from God. He was punishing - chastening - them for their sins. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:17
That Ephraim was joined to idols and was to be left alone indicates that
Assyria had not taken the northern kingdom captive at this point in Hosea's
prophecy. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:6 In saying 'my people are destroyed for lack of knowledge' God is condemning the priests for it was the priest's lips which should have taught knowledge (Mal 2:7) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.10 We can clearly see from this verse that we can never be satisfied with what the world has to offer John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
The type of Hosea taking a harlot as his wife is continued in today’s chapter. Israel has so forsaken God, committed adultery with false gods, and gone the way of other nations, that God says in Hos 4:1, “There is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land.” We must pray that the Lord doesn’t say similar things about us.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.15 The location of Bethaven is not known; and there were several different locations of Gilgal. But the appeal to Judah neither to go to Gilgal nor Bethaven has nothing to do with visiting geographical places. Gilgal means a circle (connoted by a rolling wheel), and probably refers to a circle of stones set up as an altar. Bethaven means the house of idolatry. Thus, Gilgal and Bethaven are being used figuratively to appeal to Judah not to follow the idolatrous example of Israel. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:13 Here and in the contemporary prophet - Amos 7:17 - Israel are shown to be unfaithful – this is how they were towards their God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:3 The way in which the ‘land mourns’, echoing the language of Isa 24:4, shows how contemporary prophets speak a united message. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:1 In speaking of a ‘controversy’ Hosea is using the same idea as his partially contemporary prophet – Mic 6:2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:7 God was going to mar the glory of His people because they marred His glory by their idol worship – Psa 106:20 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
FAITHFULNESS, LOVE, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT God had a charge to lay against the Israelites. This is what he said, "Hear the word of the LORD, you Israelites, because the LORD has a charge to bring against you who live in the land. 'There is no faithfulness, no love, no acknowledgement of God in the land,'" (Hos 1:4) This was a pretty bad state of affairs, and it is no wonder it was only a very short time later that God removed Israel from their land because of their wickedness. We may feel that we are not like them and that the accusation of no faithfulness, no love and no acknowledgement of God does not aply to us in the same way it applied to the Israelites who were guilty of it 100% of the time. But if any of these deficiencies are in our lives, even in a small part, there is the potential for them to increase. We must aim to be completely faithful, to be completely loving and to acknowledge God in every area of our lives, no matter how small. Are we faithful? Are we 100% committed to the LORD, no matter what? Would we deny our Lord? Do we faithfully tell others about him? Are we loving? Does acting in love for God take first priority in even our smallest decisions? Does 1Cor 13:4-6 describe our way of life? Do we acknowledge God's hand working in even the smallest ways in our lives? Do we tell others of the way he works in our lives? Let's be faithful, loving and acknowledge God in every way and at all times. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
Several verses in this chapter link the reason for Israel's failings with the priests who should have tought them about God. For example:
But when we look into the recent history of Israel we find that the priests and levites had been forced to flee the land of Israel to seek refuge in Judah (1Kin 12:31-32). Jereboam then made priests of "every class of people", meaning without any entry qualification, which would explain Israel's later predicament. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
|
The absence of ‘knowledge of God’ is referred to again – 6:6 – by the prophet Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.7-11
- This is the only occasion we are told of an all night vigil of this sort,
but it is described with a certain matter-of-factness that makes me inclined
to feel that it was not that rare an occurrence. They were so full of the
things of God that they could not stop talking about them. Are we? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 20:1
Paul having established the ecclesia moves on - but we note (20:31)
that he had spent three years in Ephesus consolidating the work. 20:13 Notice at this point that Luke takes a different route from Paul. We have to realise that Luke was not always with Paul in his journeying. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :13
Another indication of a time when Luke was not with Paul. We should not
assume that even though Luke wrote the Acts that he was with Paul all the
time. It is not Luke's diary or his journeys. It is the record given by
the Holy Spirit. Peter Forbes Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 20:
18 Paul, when writing to Timothy, draws on the language of the sea
shore and the elders from Ephesus. Acts 20:23 afflictions 2 Timothy 1:8 Acts 20:24 none of those things ... 2 Timothy 1:7 Acts 20:31 tears 2 Timothy 1:4 This is because the letters to Timothy are written to him whilst he was in Ephesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 20:35 Following on my comment in May this year notice 'I have coveted no man's silver, or gold or apparel' quotes Moses again (Lev 16:15) where, it seems, that there were accusations against Moses' integrity which we know was often a problem for Paul. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.35 "It is more blessed to give than to receive" This saying of Jesus is not recorded in the Gospel records. However the Lord's teaching was consistent with this. 2Cor 8:9 We also have the words recorded by Luke in his Gospel "Give and it shall be given unto you" John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| ETERNAL THINGS When Paul popped in at Ephesus on his way through to Jerusalem, he told them many things. Two points from what he said stood out for me in particular. The first one was that none of them would ever see him again, and the second was that after his departure people would come into the church like savage wolves and distort the truth, drawing many disciples away after them. At the end of his short time with the believers they prayed, wept, embraced, kissed and then parted company. We read this of the Ephesians: "What grieved them most was his statement that they would never see his face again." (Acts 20:38) When we love someone, the fact that we may not see them again has a real pull on the emotions. It will cause us to grieve and weep. Yet we also know that if we are in the Lord, we will meet again at the return of the Lord Jesus. The uniting we will share will far outshine any grief we might have had today. Paul's departure was really only temporary. Perhaps what should have grieved them more, and should concern and grieve us also, was that disciples from their own number were going to be lost from the faith - eternally. Something still future does not pull on the heart strings so much, but in this case requires much more energy and concentration. Let's be sure we focus on things that are eternal. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| V.33-35 - Paul took care of not only his financial needs but those of others. He wasn't in it for the money. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
V.19 Serving here means to serve as a bond slave; (douleuo 398) It is an exhortation to all to consider themselves under bondage to Christ, not free fo do their own will, but to be ready at all times to serve the Lord in His Work. We must remember that our spare time is not our own. If spare time is used in the Lord's Service, the bond slave is giving no more than his reasonable service. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
20:28 When brethren were described as ‘overseers’ the great responsibility of that task is demonstrated by the way in which Paul describes what they were to take care of. It was the ecclesia. But the way Paul describes it’s origins highlights the responsibility . It was ‘purchased with his own blood’. Not doing the job properly would mean that some who Jesus had died for would be lost. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.4 All the travelers would have carried the contribution from the places named with them. It is interesting to note that no one is mentioned by Luke as being from Corinth in Achaia. Why is this? We certainly do not know, but it is suggested by many writers that Titus may have been entrusted with the contributions from the believers in Corinth. It is also worth noting that Titus is not mentioned by Luke in his recording of the events concerning the first century eccleias. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
v 26-29 Paul's words here are reminiscent of Ezekiel's description of the watchman & his responsibility Eze 33 Of course it also echoes the imagery of the Lord Jesus concerning shepherding the flock John 10
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
20:24 Paul is so single minded in his purpose that he was willing to accept troubles thugh he could easily have avoided them by changing his plans. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 20:24 The grace of God was the power of the Holy Spirit which was given to the apostles to preach the gospel to the world. This grace was given to Paul for the express purpose of enabling him to preach the unsearchable riches of Christ (Eph 3:8) The grace was given also, to enable the Gentiles to understand the mystery of the gospel which aforetime was hidden, but is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the spirit (Eph 3:5,5.9-10) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
Eutychus means fortunate. He was aptly named since the Spirit revived him by the hand of Paul (vs.9,10).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
20:11 The misfortune of Eutychus provided an opportunity for God’s grace to be seen. How often do we look for good when something untoward happens to us? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
20:16 So Paul did not stop at Ephesus even though he passed by and there was a small group of believers there who were all very young in the faith. Maybe the reason why Paul did not see the need to stop there was because he was confident in the abilities of Timothy to take care of them. 1Tim 1:3, Acts 20:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.7 Sunday has become the day of meeting to break bread based on this verse. We have ordered our lives around it and it has become convenient. However, it is not a divine law and we are free to break bread on as many days or occasions as we wish. Vs.22,24,26,27 Show the faith and confidence of Paul. Although he did not know what was in store for him at Jerusalem, he was prepared to lose his life knowing that he had given a good account of himself. This is an excellent attitude for us to emulate. Vs.29,30 We look back through history and can see the development of false doctrines. The great false system of worship which we see in Christendom today grew out of the errors that Paul warns about here. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
20:30 It is complacent to think that false teaching always emanates from without the Christian community. Such a view leads one into a false sense of security with one’s brethren. Here Paul warns that their own number will bring forth error in belief and practice and those who are not wary will be led astray. It is easy to spot error when it is coming from outside the community but we are far less likely to spot it in the early days of its manifestation in our own community. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||