December 18

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Job  22
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Job 22 online in the King James Version
Listen to Job 22 online in the New International Version

 

v.6,7 - One wonders what can possibly have brought about this accusation. Job was clearly recognised as an upright man whilst he was prosperous, but now he is destitute the attitude towards him has changed. We really must recognise this fault in ourselves (I know I do). We despise people who we do not view as successful. This is very wrong, and must be stopped. The love of God, which should be in us, does not respect persons. Lev.19:15, Deut.1:17,16:19, Prov.24:23, 28:21, Acts 10:34
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Eliphaz responds for the third time.

Eliphaz now is on the offensive. Whereas in his first speech he had been conciliatory he is now openly critical of and antagonistic to Job. See in particular Vs 4-9 where Eliphaz contradicts what he said in chapter 4.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
We are given this extended argument between these men and Job in such detail that there must be a great deal for us to learn from examining it. There is much emotion involved here too. Job is in the depths of depression because of the chastening God has given him but can see beyond it to the lessons he needs to learn. His friends are angry because they are convinced he has deceived them and he must be a terrible sinner, even though they must know this not to be the case. We are, as human beings, so terribly inclined to condemn others. We must avoid this natural urge if we are to manifest God in our lives, as He does not wish us to possess this quality.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
22:2 Job doubtless understood that a man cannot be profitable to God - He doubtless understood that 'we are all unprofitable servants' (Luke 17:10) But it does not follow from this that God does not have an interest in man or disregard his service to Him.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
22:15-16 This indicates that Eliphaz was aware of the record of the flood and why it took place.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Job 22:21-30. Eliphaz ended as he began, with an exhortation to repentance in a tone of gentleness, but having demonstrated an inflexibility unable to receive new ideas or move to higher conceptions of truth.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John
Where did Eliphaz get his evidence from, for the terrible things he accuses Job of? (Job 22:5-7). It's a useful lesson also to us, that even though people might mention God as though they believe in Him, yet that doesn't automatically make them right (see Job 22:22-28). For example do we really believe that if we stop sinning God will give us lots of gold and silver?
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
Here, Eliphaz turns up the vitriol.  He continues to equate punishment with sin, but now he also equates righteousness (via repentance) with wealth (vs.23-25).  He obviously does not speak for the LORD since Job has already been deemed a righteous man (1:1).  By that reckoning, Job should still be wealthy.  Eliphaz does not know the mind of the LORD when he makes his assessment of what pleases (or does not please) Him (vs. 2,3).  He then mocks Job's piety (v.4).  Had he understood the LORD, then he would have known that the righteous and upright do please Him (Psa 11:7).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

  

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

22:19 Having spoken of the reason for the flood and the ensuing suffering Eliphaz implies that Job, because he is suffering, is of the same mind as those who perished in the flood. So often the ‘friends’ of Job imply what he thinks rather than stating it openly. How often do we stop short of saying the thing that we think because we feel safer making innuendoes?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

22:3 Eliphaz’s questions whether God takes pleasure in the righteousness of Job. Implying that God does not care for His servants.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

22:4-9  Eliphaz’s comments here directly contradict what he has already said about Job when he spoke for the first time –Job 4:3-9.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

GIVE GOD PLEASURE

 

Until Eliphaz got personal, which was in less than the first ten percent of his reply to Job, he asked some very interesting questions. "Can a man be of benefit to God? Can even a wise man benefit him? What pleasure would it give the Almighty if you were righteous? What would he gain if your ways were blameless?" (Job 22:2-3)

 

The answer to these questions is that no matter how blameless or righteous we were, there is no way we can benefit him. He is, after all, God. Everything we have has been given to us by him, and because we sin there is nothing we can do or give that he is not able to have or do himself already.

 

But the other part of Eliphaz's question was about pleasure. "What pleasure would it give the Almighty if you were righteous?" Though Eliphaz dumps all these questions together in one heap, there is a difference between what benefits or gain we can give to God, and the pleasure we can give him. When Samuel rebuked Saul he spoke about God's pleasure, saying, "Does the LORD delight in burnt offering and sacrifices as much as in obeying the voice of the LORD? To obey is better than sacrifice, and to heed is better than the fat of rams." (1Sam 15:23) When Jesus obeyed God, God said that he loved him and that he was well pleased with him. (Mark 1:11)

 

So while we cannot give anything to God, we can give him pleasure by our obedience and love. Let us, by our way of life, give God pleasure.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Robert

 

Vs.6-9 Eliphaz' accusations are without proof.  It was common for rich men to abuse the poor. Later the Law of Moses would caution against these errors (Exo 22:26; Deut 24:10). And later again, the powerful Pharisees would be similarly cautioned by the Lord (Matt 23:14).  But, Eliphaz applies faulty logic to bring about his conclusion concerning Job.  He employs a syllogism.  In effect, he says: All rich men are abusers of the poor ---->Job is a rich man ---->Therefore, Job is an abuser of the poor. Eliphaz has taken a major premiss, and a minor premiss.  From those he has made his conclusion.  Job had an accusation levelled at him based upon erroneous logic. Clearly, we should be able to see the problem here.  We must be careful not to make the same mistake in our thinking.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael
At the end of the book of Job we find God's accusation against Eliphaz: "you have not said of me what was right "(42:7). I think God is referring to v4-5 and similar verses (use bible version other than AV), where Eliphaz claims that God only brings chastening on the unrighteous. In fact, his mocking question in v4 is spot on: "Is it because of your fear of Him that He corrects you?" (NKJV). Elsewhere in scripture we read that it is the privilege of the righteous to be corrected by God, because in doing so He is acting as a father, trying to build our Godly character (see Heb 12:8-10, Prov 3:11-12).
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Rob

22:17-18 Eliphaz’s response to Job’s lament about the way in which the wicked prosper is to remind Job that God provides for those who do not acknowledge Him.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

22:23-24 Eliphaz now commits the fundamental error of thinking that God will bless the faithful with material things.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Haggai 1 and 2
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Haggai 1 online in the King James Version Listen to Haggai 2 online in the King James Version
Listen to Haggai 1 online in the New International Version Listen to Haggai 2 online in the New International Version

 

1 v.6-9 - Where are our desires? Are we in a position where God might blow away our possessions, just to show us the way we should be thinking? God clearly blesses those who put Him first, but often not for many years, which is a great test of faith and patience. Let us all endure, that words like these might not be levelled against us.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Use of Old Testament Language

1:6 'ye have sown much and bring in little' Deuteronomy 28:38
1:6 'ye eat but ye have not enough' Leviticus 26:26
1:10 'heaven stayed from dew' Leviticus 26:19
1:11 'drought upon the land' Deuteronomy 28:24
2:6 'Yet once ... the earth Hebrews 12:26
2:17 'I smote you ... saith the Lord Amos 4:9
2:17 'blasting and mildew' Deuteronomy 28:22

1:2 'the time is not come ... ' The return from Babylon was in fulfilment of the 70 years prophecy of Jeremiah. There were three waves of captives taken away to Babylon. Therefore those in Jerusalem who did not want to involve themselves in the Lord's work were able to present an excuse for their idleness. The rebuilding of the temple was to be accomplished at the end of the 70 years captivity. They would reason that there had not been 70 years since the last wave of captives had been taken away so they should not build yet. In reality such an argument was an excuse based on miss applied Scripture. We can use similar arguments to justify our own inactivity if we are not careful.

2:4 'Be strong' as an exhortations mirrors the way that God spoke to Israel as they were about to enter into the land under Joshua. Deuteronomy 11:8 31:6 31:23 Joshua 1:6 1:9 1:18 10:25
2:5 'according to the word ... out of Egypt' The return from Babylon was another example of deliverance life the exodus fro Egypt so much earlier.
2:23 Zerubbabel is to made a signet. In Zechariah 6:11 - 13 presents Joshua as the branch building the house. Thus we see Haggai and Zechariah complimenting each other in that they both speak of one of the two faithful men who were involved in the building.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
1v.14 - When we read words like this it makes us stop and consider whether our decision to serve God is really our own or whether He has stirred us up to do it. The latter seems to be the case here and in many other places too. This is quite a humbling thought and we should thank God constantly for doing this.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

ch.1 The repeated use of the curses from Leviticus 26 / Deuteronomy 28 - see list above - was being used by the prophet to encourage the nation to re commence the work of re building. The curses were to show Israel that they were astray from Gods law.

2:3 The question 'who is left …' relies on the fact that here were some in Jerusalem who had survived the whole of the 70 year captivity and were old enough when they were taken captive to appreciate the magnificence of the temple - so they must have been at least 80 years old! - We know the reaction of these men (Ezra 3:12)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

1:12 The way that Zerubbabel and Joshua and all the people responded to the preaching of Haggai is true repentance. It is difficult for us to respond to direct criticism and change - it requires that we acknowledge that we have not been doing the right things and as such hurts our pride. The example of these men and the people at this time of return from Babylon serves as a powerful example of the way that God will bless those who repent (1:13) 'I am with you …'

2:4 The assurance that God was 'with' them as at was when #ye came out of Egypt' is designed to show that God is truly delivering the people even though at this time they are dealing with the opposition of the inhabitants of the land at that time.

The road to the kingdom is not always smooth and trouble free. The Exodus from Egypt was not, the return from Babylon was not so we should not expect that our journey to the kingdom will be trouble free either.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Hag 1:1, 2:1.We see the closeness of Haggai and Zechariah when we compare these two verses with the opening verse of Zechariah, The time difference between Haggai’s first prophesy and Zechariah’s was two months. When we go back to Ezra (5:1, 6:14 we see that Haggai and Zechariah worked together in the rebuilding of the temple. Zechariah was a young man.(Zech 2:4) Haggai we assume was an old man. He speaks as though he had seen the first temple in its glory. (Hag 2:3) Thus youth and experience worked side by side providing to the children of Israel, both young and old. Such co-operation is an exhortation for all ages.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John

1:11 When the prophet says 'I called for a drought' he is speaking like Elijah who prayed to God that it might not rain (James 5:17)

2:6  In speaking of the shaking of the heaven and earth Haggai  is reminding the returning exiles of the warning of Isaiah (13:13)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
1:2 There is no indication in Scripture that representation was made to Darius during the first two years of his reign in the hope of annulling the decree of Artaxerxes. Rather, Israel had lapsed into a false sense of security; the opposition from the surrounding nations had caused them to begin making excuses. Rather than attempt to renew their efforts for building the temple, the people said that the time was inopportune.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
We, like the men in Haggai's day, are charged with building a house for the LORD.  We, the ecclesia of Christ are that house, which not only must be built but maintained (1Pet 2:5).  The exhortation here is to put the LORD first.  If we do this, then all appropriate blessings will ensue (Matt 6:33). 
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

2:6 Here God is referring to the shaking of the Mosaic system as demonstated by the writer to the Hebrews 12. In this chapter we see a contrast between the the two covenants. The old covenant entered into, in the mdst of thunder, darkness and fire, causing fear and trembling (V.18-21). The new covenant founded on better promises offering a better hope because it was established by better sacrifices which speaketh better things than that of Abel (V.24). At Sinai, God had caused the earth to shake, but now he hath promised, saying "yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also the heavens"  V.26


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

 

Haggai, whose name means my feast, prophesied in 520 BC.  He urged the Jews of Babylon to complete re-building the temple.  The re-building of the temple had been started earlier, but no work had been done on it for the past 15 years.  During captivity, the Jews had prospered.  Now, they lived in luxuriously paneled houses (paneled with expensive, imported wood) (1:4).  They had taken care of heir own houses but had forgotten to take care of the House of the LORD.  In the midst of prosperity it is easy to forget the LORD.  We must be careful, especially those who live in the prosperous west, not to copy this attitude and neglect the LORD's house (ecclesia).  Under the urging of Haggai, the Jew's conscience was stirred; and through the leadership of Zerubbabel and Joshua, the temple was completed in 515 BC. 

Haggai looks to the future when Christ will return.  He will put down the opposing nations and establish a rule of peace and righteousness.  A new temple will be established in Jerusalem where all people will come to worship (2:6,7,21,22; Isa 56:7; Eze 40;41;42;43).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

Haggai and Zechariah were the two prophets who encouraged the work of rebuilding the Temple, and the city walls of Jerusalem. Probably Malachi then came after them.  The history of the times is therefore in Ezra and Nehemiah. Haggai spoke forcefully, eg Hag 1:4. “Is this the right time to enjoy your warm and comfortable houses, while the House of God lies waste? God says, ‘Consider your ways’.”  The message worked, and the Lord stirred up Zerubbabel (the sort of “mayor” of Jerusalem), and Joshua the High Priest. They then took charge of the work of restoration and rebuilding.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
1:4    The work had ceased – they were no longer allowed to build the temple – Ezra 4:24 – so the people started to build for themselves instead. Do we leave off the work of God because of difficulties and then turn to building for ourselves?

 

2:7       Solomon’s temple had been filled with the glory of God – 2Chron 5:14 – some would maybe even seen it. The current situation looked bleak in contrast to that. However the promise is there, whilst it was not fulfilled in their life time it will happen in the kingdom when ‘the Lord is there’Eze 48:35



Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

1:10 The comment ‘the heaven over you is stayed from dew’ quotes the curse from Leviticus 26:19. The introduction ‘therefore’ shows that the curse is a consequence of faithless behaviour. Israel agreed that the curses would come upon them if they were faithless. Hence God is fulfilling His word upon them – but they do not see it.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
2:4-5 An important lesson for all is delivered here; "By grace are ye saved" Eph 2:8 "the just shall live by faith" Gal 3:11. Israel viewed their "works' in building God's house, as being necessary to the purpose of God being fulfilled, because their hope and faith had began to diminish. We see Haggai exhorting the people to be faithful, and to display courage and determination. "Be strong and work" Faith is demonstrated by works.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

1:5    The recurring – 1:5, 2:15,18– was presented to men and women who had recently returned from Babylon in fulfilment of Scripture. One might have thought they would be filled with enthusiasm. However they needed to be encouraged to think! What about ourselves? We live in exciting times when Israel exists – proof that God is at work. Do we need to consider our ways?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

1:1 Darius was a common name for Persian kings, as was Pharaoh for Egyptian kings, or Abimelech for Philistine kings. This Darius was Hystaspes. The sixth month refers to the Hebrew calendar and not to the reign of Darius. The sixth month was called Elul which relates to September (in part).

2:21-23 Zerubbabel represents a type of Christ. He has been chosen by the LORD. The symbol of power (the signet = the seal of authority) would be given to Zerubbabel as it would be to Jesus (1Cor 15:27).

 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

1:2 Just as Amos had done – Amos 4:6-11– Haggai draws upon the curses of Deut 28:38 and Leviticus 26:26 to highlight to the returning Jews that they are not keeping the law of Moses.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
v 22 First Principles>Kingdom of God>To be Everlasting and world-wide
The Kingdom of God will be a literal kingdom on the earth and last for ever. For more details go to Dan 2:44
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

THE TIME IS NOT RIGHT

 

God's timing and our timing often differ. Moses thought the time was right to deliver the children of Israel out of Egypt, but he was to be very dissappointed and spent the next forty years looking after sheep for his father-in-law. Later, when God was ready for Moses to lead his people, Moses didn't feel ready.

 

Haggai had a similar message for those who had come back from captivity to live in Jerusalem. The people were saying, "The time has not yet come for the LORD's house to be built." (Hag 1:2) But God's plan was different. Through Haggai the LORD asked, "Is it a time for you yourselves to be living in your panelled houses, while this house (the temple) remains a ruin?" (v.3)

 

Do we ever use the same excuse? "The time is not right!" I have heard it before when it comes to preaching and when there is opportunity to improve the way we worship. Will the time ever be right? "The time is not right," can also be heard in the common phraze, "I am too busy." To be busy is good, but with what priorities? The people of Haggai's day were busy but with their own things, not God's. Too busy is too often an excuse not to do the LORD's work. More often than not the time is right, but like the people of Jerusalem we are preoccupied with doing our own thing. Let's reprioritise and make sure the time is always right for doing the will of the LORD.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

Have you ever felt like 1:6: your wages are put into a bag full of holes? I guess we all have. On this occassion God had been actively putting those holes in the bag. Does that happen to us too?

God had caused a remnant of Israel to return from captivity to rebuild His temple. They had been given plenty of money and building materials to do this by King Cyrus. Instead of finishing the temple, had those building materials found their way into their own houses? Verse 8 appears to suggest this: Go to the mountains and fetch wood to build the house, and v4: Why do you dwell in panelled houses?

So if we have been using God's materials to build our own house instead of His house, we can expect a similar situation to this. The call to us is the same as the call of the prophet: "consider your ways" (1:5).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

2:1  The feast of tabernacles ran for seven days starting on the 15th day of the 7th month. Leviticus 23:34. Haggai gave this part of his message on the 21st day of the 7th month. So this part of the message was given during that feat. When we realise that the feast of tabernacles was to remind Israel of how they had dwelt in ‘booths’ in the wilderness the comment in 2:5 about coming out of Egypt takes on a new meaning. Whilst the people were thinking about their time in the wilderness after they had come out of Egypt Haggai speaks to them about that very thing.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - 1John  5
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to 1John 5 online in the King James Version
Listen to 1John 5 online in the New International Version

 

v.12 - This very black and white picture is presented throughout this book - light or darkness, as it were. We are assured over and over again that we walk in the light. Let us then throw out of our lives any doubt about that and consequently turn ourselves from the darkness that is around us. 1John 2:23-24 John 1:12. 3:36, 5:24. Gal.2:20 puts it in perspective for us.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
5:4 In speaking of overcoming the world John again speak language Jesus has already used. John 16:33.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
5:13 'Believe on me have eternal life' quotes John 3:16 So John is writing to reinforce the message of the gospel. That God is interested in men believing so that they might have everlasting life. We should not forget that God is not willing that we perish but that we come to repentance (1 Peter 3:9)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:13 'believe' and 'eternal' life' quote John 3:16. This use of John's letter expands the words Jesus spoke to Nicodemus to explain that belief brings action.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
"Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ, is born of God"

A very bold statement, and a very simple one, but is it true? How can everyone who says they believe in Christ, actually be born of God? A similar statement is made in John 3v15 "that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life". How can it be that simple? Surely there's more to it than that, or else anyone can say the words "I believe in Jesus", and God will have to save them!

But we've made an assumption about the verse. The verse says "whoever believes", not "whoever SAYS they believe". John goes on to say that whoever believes is a son of God. Do you have any brothers or sisters? If you do, you know how you treat them differently to other people? Blood is thicker than water, they say, and what this means is that once the chips are down, family will stick together no matter what. John is saying that if we exhibit this behaviour with the sons and daughters of God, then by implication we will actually be the son or daughter of God ourselves. So John goes on to say "everyone who loves Him who begot (God) also loves him who is begotten of Him (our fellow sons and daughters)."

So what does that have to do with faith, because the statement says "whoever believes Jesus is the Christ, is born of God"?

If you are not born of God, then who are you born of? Verses 18 and 19 give us only one option.... "the wicked one". John says that you are either born of God, or you are still in the family of the "wicked one", along with the rest of the world (v19). Jesus says the same thing when he is trying to get the Pharisees to see sense... "You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do". Jesus is saying that if you are in the family of the devil, then you are bound to be doing the things your father does. You can't help it. And what are these things? "there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own, for he is a liar and the father of it." (John 8v44)

The opposite is true for the sons of God: v20 "And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is TRUE; and we are in Him who is TRUE, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the TRUE God and eternal life.". John says the same in John 3v21 "he who does THE TRUTH comes to the light". Those who are in the world are also described as being in Adam. Why? Adam tried to deceive God. It is this nature that we inherit, and this nature that we will keep, unless we are born of God through faith.

So finally, to answer the question "what has faith got to do with it?". It is simply this: We cannot tell the truth without faith. If Adam had faith in God's mercy at the beginning, then he would have been able to tell the truth, but he didn't and couldn't. If Cain had faith in God's love, he would have confessed fully to God, but he didn't and he couldn't. Not only is it impossible, but the person without faith will always lie to cover himself up. He does this because he doesn't actually believe that God knows everything. He has nothing to lose. What option does a believer have but to confess to the one before whose sight "all things are naked and open"? This is the conclusion of the whole matter. Faith is the evidence of things unseen (Heb 11v1). With the eyes of faith the believer sees the invisible God, and fears his gaze. With the eyes of faith the believer confesses his sin, knowing it is pointless hiding it. With the eyes of faith the believer looks upon Jesus, the only way he can be saved (John 3v14-15). With the eyes of faith the believer renounces his old birth into the family of Adam, and is reborn into the family of Christ. With the eyes of faith he recognises his new status, and starts to exhibit love to his fellow family members. Whoever has faith that Jesus is the Christ, IS born of God.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Rob

 

V.6 speaks of the two elements that mark Jesus' authenticity - water and blood. Jesus was baptized (complete immersion in water) by John: to fulfill all righteousness (Matt 3:15). He set the pattern of baptism and salvation for all believers to follow (Mark 16:16). It was necessary for Jesus to die to crucify the flesh (sin). He was the perfect sacrifice through whose blood sins could be forgiven (Eph 1:7; 1John 2:2).  The pattern is for us to follow.  After baptism, we should crucify the flesh daily (1Pet 4:1,2).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Michael
V.21 John here urges the believers to abstain from any form of worship that draws them away from God. In our society, this can be a multitude of things, with materialism high on the list. Life in North America is built around material things.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

(5:5)  When we are so tempted to think that we can ‘overcome’ by our own effort it is most encouraging to realise that what the Father requires of us is belief - like Abraham


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Prayer that includes our enemies - 5:14-17; Matt 5:44; Luke 23:34; Acts 7:59-60; Num 14:10-20
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

5:12 So have we the son? Life, both now and in the kingdom, is driven by knowing Jesus and his Father.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

5:1-2 In these two opening verses John brings out three essentials for the believer.

 

FAITH
To believe; John developes the significance of believing that Christ is the Son of God. This involves being born of the spirit.
LOVE
One cannot exist without the other,they demonstrate the life of a believer.
OBEDIENCE
This is brought foreword in three parts; Love of the believers, Love of God, and obedience to His commands.
 

If any part of these verses is to be valid, it has to be part of the other two. (John 14:45, John 15:10)



John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

5:9 The ‘witness of men’ is rather like the ‘praise of men’ and it the thing which the flesh loves. However it is the ‘witness (praise) of God’ which we should be seeking.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

 

V.7 in the KJV was not in the original text but later inserted, when printing was used.

Adam Clarke writes: But it is likely this verse is not genuine. It is wanting in every MS. of this epistle written before the invention of printing, one excepted, the Codex Montfortii, in Trinity College, Dublin: the others which omit this verse amount to one hundred and twelve.

More modern versions of the Bible omit this verse altogether. Others, like the ESV, define it this way: For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree. This avoids the obvious temptation to erroneously prove the Trinity from the KJV.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

4:12    In quoting John 1:18John explains that the way Jesus ‘declared’ God should be our behaviour also. By our actions others will see what God is like if we are faithful.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

5:21  The one who brother or sister who is able to ‘keep’ the commandments will, by the very nature of their focus keep themselves from idols.  Idol worship is self seeking. Keeping the commandments is God seeking.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter