|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.4
- If Bildad was aware of the work that righteous Job undertook on behalf
of his children, lest they be wayward (ch.1:5)
surely he would have reviewed this statement. He is inferring that Job's
suffering is a result of the sin of his children, and he is being punished
now for them. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Bildad
makes his first speech. The main thrust of Bildad's comment is that he seems to think that Job felt that what had happened to him was unjust. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.6
- Time and time again these three friends try to convince Job that he is
no longer right in God's sight. Thye use only the evidence of their eyes
- they argue that if God has deserted him, as seems the case, then he must
be a sinner, and not 'pure and upright', which is in direct contrast to
the way that God described Job himself in ch.1:8. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 8:20
In saying that 'God will not cast away a perfect man Bildad echoes God's
description of Job - but is Bildad saying that Job can, therefore, take
courage, or is he saying that the events that Job is now suffering indicate
that Job is not 'perfect' Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 8:4-6
The repeated use of 'if' by Bildad is his appeal to Job to turn from his
ways to God. One wonders how often we feel that a believer's problem is
because they have turned away from God. It is so easy to make judgements
on others which have no basis in truth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| How wrong Bildad was! In Job 8:1-7 Bildad told Job that if he was righteous then God would come to his aid and cure him. Surely, it doesn’t work like that. Our Hebrews reading for yesterday tells us that God chastens us so that we will be more God-like (Heb 12:5-13). And in Job’s case, there was the added point that Job was to be an example to others, (see Job 2:3) “Hast thou considered my servant Job?” David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.10 In Job 6:24 Job had said "teach me", because of this Bildad is answering him to inquire of the fathers, their words would be from observation and reflection, not merely words from their mouth, but from the heart. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Bildad would rather analyze and sit in judgement than comfort Job. His conclusion is that Job's plight is punishment for sin (vs.4,5 ). He intimates that Job has somehow forgotten his God (vs.11-13). He justifies his examination by claiming to understand the mind of the LORD (v.20). Let us not be guilty of Bildad's presumption when dealing with our brothers and sisters (Rom 12:8; 1Cor 2:16).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
8:4 The comment ‘if thy children …’ seems to play on Job’s concern which is outlined in Job 1:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 8:12 The bulrush, or the papyras of Egypt, is a strong plant until it ripens, but once it has ripened, it withers more suddenly than any other herb, having no self-sustaining power, once the moisture is gone, which other herbs do not need in the same degree. We see here that ruin falls upon the godless at the peak of their prosperity, more suddenly than on other plants or herbs which do not appear to be as strongly rooted. The Psalmist shows this same principle in Psa 112:10 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
8:6 In saying ‘if thou wert … upright’ Bildad is disputing God’s own assessment of Job seen in Job 2:3 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
8:2 Bildad is saying that all he is hearing from Job is, as we would put it, ‘a lot of hot air’. Not a very helpful response.! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
SAGE ADVICE In today's world, where managers are becoming younger and younger, where information is available at our fingertips, and where self centredness and arrogance seem to be the order of the day, Bildad's advice to Job should be taken more than ever before. He said, "Ask the former generations and find out what their followers learned, for we were born only yesterday and know nothing, and our days are but a shadow. Will they not instruct you and tell you? Will they not bring forth words from their understanding?" (Job 8:8-10) Taking advice from older people is not so fashionable today. Yet those who are older, while they may not have the same grasp on technology as younger people do, have a wealth of experience in life, relationships, dealing with people, spirituality, and about what is really important. While the world hardly recognises it any more, practical experience has far more value than any qualifications we can aquire. So let's take Bildad's advice even though it was given so long ago. Let's spend time with those from our parents and grandparent's generations, talking to them, learning from them, and picking up the pearls of wisdom that they give to us. Time invested with an older and wiser generation will never be wasted. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
8:1 Bildad was a Shuhite. This meant that he was a descendent of Shuah, one of the son's of Abraham by Keturah. Abraham sent the sons of his concubines away to live in the desert (Gen 25:1,2,6). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
8:6 Bildad makes the common mistake of equating material wealth with blessing from God. Such thinking is clearly wrong but many of us hold this view even if we deny it simply by the way we view those with money. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Bildad says in v4 that God slew Job's children because of their transgression. In v3 he says God is just to have done so. Could this be right? Surprisingly enough, Job seemed to think so because his reply is: "Truly I know it is so" (9v2). Practically the only introductory detail we have of Job's life in Job 1 is that he attempted to cover over his children's sins with sacrifices (1v5). This is not God's way, who desires repentance and obedience from the individual, not blanket forgiveness through sacrifice (Heb 10:4-6). Can you think of any other examples in scripture where God removes the children of a Godly man because of their own sin? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
8:3 Doth God pervert judgement is Bildad’s way of accusing Job of misrepresenting God’s actions. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| 4
v.4 - This beautiful pastoral picture is painted three times in scripture
using these words. Here, 1Kings
4:25, Zech.3:10 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
3:1 'And I said' shows that Micah is writing down his words some time after he spoke them. 3:2 The attitude show here is warned against in Amos, a contemporary prophet. Amos 5:15 4:1 The assurance the 'mountain of the Lord of hosts' will be exalted above the hills draws on the fact that the mount Zion on which Jerusalem is situated is lower than, and surrounded by, mountains, hence the Psalmist could say Psalm 125:2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 3
v.4 - I have been struck in my readings this year by the number of times
God says he will not hear, over the ages, as scripture is written. It is
always, of course, because the people who cry to him have beahved in a way
that has made their cry of none effect. This is quite frightening, and should
make us look to our own behaviour. Here are a few more examples - Psa.18:41,
Prov.1:28, Isa.1:15 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
3:12 We know that these words were spoken to Hezekiah (Jeremiah 23:18) So here we have an example of a very specific prophecy which was not fulfilled when the prophet gave the warning, even though it was going to be fulfilled at that time. The delay was brought about by the repentance of the king. In this respect it is similar to the way that God worked through Jonah. The chapter division between Chapter 3 and 4 is arbitrary and breaks the flow of the prophet's message. God is saying that despite the fact that Jerusalem was going to be destroyed - which is was finally in AD 135 - there will be a time of great glory for Israel. Clearly this will be at the time of the kingdom when Christ returns. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
3:5 In saying that 'they make my people err' Micah is echoing the ideas of two contemporary prophets (Isaiah 24:2 Hosea 4:9) 4:4 'Every man under his vine and fig tree' contrasts and acts as a challenge to the Assyrian king (2 Kings 18:31) who sought to turn the people away from Hezekiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Micah 3:12. This is the first warning through a prophet to foretell of the literal destruction of the city of Jerusalem, and of course of the temple. Hezekiah listened and heeded the warning and as a result the destruction was delayed until Babylon under Nebuchadezzar destroyed the city and temple. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
3:5Continuing last year's comment. Whilst Isaiah and Hosea involve the priests in the corruption Micah specifically says it was the 'prophets'. So we see that all classes of teachers were corrupt. This must have made life very difficult for the faithful prophets at this time. 4:10 Continuing what we saw about Babylon in Chapter 2 we now have a specific threat of captivity in Babylon - and all this is before the Assyrians had been destroyed on the mountains of Israel in the days of Hezekiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
4:1-5 As we read through these verses we clearly see that the Kingdom will be characterized by seven things;(true perfection and completeness).
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
|
4:1-8 give a beautiful picture of the Kingdom age when the remnant of Israel will be favored. Then 4:9-13 plunge back into the reality of Israel's coming (post Micah) disaster. Notice in 4:1 the physical change that will occur in Jerusalem at Christ's return. The earthquake at that time will lift Zion to an elevated plateau where Ezekiel's temple will be placed (see Zech 14:4,10).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
a) Mic 3:1-4,8-12 is directed to the leaders who should have known better than lead the people astray, and Mic 3:5-7 is spoken against the false prophets who have spoken lies to God’s own land. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
3:6 The prophecy given by Micah that the people would not have a vision was fulfilled at the time of the Babylonian invasion – Eze 12:22 4:2 The nations eagerness to go and learn of God is rather like what happened in the days of Solomon when the queen of Sheba came to see Solomon and hard his wisdom – 2Chron 9:1-5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Mic 4:1-2 seems to be a reference to the heavenly Jerusalem, mount Zion, which is described in Heb 12:22 as being better than the mountain of Sinai. The word, then, that proceeds from Zion is the word of Christ which we have in our bible, and refers to the spreading of the gospel among "many nations" (v2). If this is true then it follows that v4 is not a literal vine and fig tree, but a reference to the independence we achieve by the gospel in which there is "neither bond nor free" and "no partiality". Yet these blessings do not apply to the present time alone, but will continue on past the return of Christ and beyond (v7). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
4:10 Micah warns abut the Babylonian captivity at the same time as the King Hezekiah is entertaining the ambassadors from Babylon. Isa 39:1-2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 4:13 As Micah concludes this portion of the prophesy. he looks forward once again to the great day when Israel's God, is no longer just the God of Israel, but, is now spoken of as "the LORD of the whole earth." John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
4:5 The comment that Israel will walk in the name of the Lord echoes the words of the contemporary prophet – Isa 2:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
4:1-3 Compare these verses with a parallel account in Isa 2:2-4. The nations of the world will surrender to the Lord Jesus and peace will ensue. This is after the nations will have tried to militarily defeat Jesus. Compare the language of Joel 3:10, as the nations prepare for war, with 4:3 when the nations sue for peace. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
3:4 In crying unto God and yet not being heard the prophet is using similar language to that which the contemporary prophet has said – Hos 5:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
v 7,8 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Restored Israel to be God's Kingdom Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
Mic 4:1-8;Isa 2:1-4;Luke 1:32-33 - The future millenial kingdom age when called out Jews and Gentiles are blessed, and Christ reigns on earth from David's throne in Jerusalem. 4:2 - The law will go out from Zion and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. Jer 3:17;Isa 62:1-4,6-7 - in Isa.62:4 the new name for Zion will be "Hephzibah" which means "my delight is in her" and the land will be "Beulah" which means "married" (to Christ the bridegroom). 4:4 - This verse combines Lev 26:4-5;1Kin 4:25 and refers to a return to the Davidic kingdom and an even greater prosperity than that under Solomon. 4:5 - This would appear to be a regression to either Micah's day or some time prior to Christ's rule when many don't follow the true God. 4:6 - "In that day...I will gather the lame..." ("lame" could mean afflicted, injured, etc. i.e. Israel suffering before glory). 4:7 - Mount Zion was a hill just outside the walls of Old Jerusalem, the temple mount, the city of David. Christ will rule on the throne of David. 4:8 - "tower of the flock" is probably Jerusalem while "the flock" is probably Israel. "strong hold" is probably "Ophal" a hill in the South of Jerusalem while the "daughter of Zion" is probably the called ones who worship the true God (Isa 62:11-12 - faithful Jews past and present and faithful Gentiles/spiritual Jews who are brides to the bridegroom Christ. Those in Jerusalem will get a king. Christ will be the son of David who inherits David's throne (2Sam 7:10-16). Faithful Gentiles are like grafted in spiritual Jews (Gal 3:6-9,26-29). 4:9 - This verse is prophecy but prior to the kingdom age as soon Judah would lament due to exile and have no king or counselor (Isa 9:6). The people suffering like a woman in labor (Hos 13:12-13). 4:10 - "You will go to Babylon" (the people of Judah would abandon the city, camp in the open field, and even go to Babylon - this prophecy goes beyond the 10 tribes being taken by Assyria in 722 BC to 586 BC when Judah was taken by Babylon). "There the Lord will redeem you out of the hands of your enemies" (redemption after 70 years and an ultimate redemption when Christ returns to make his people truly free - from sin and death). 4:11 - "now many nations are gathered against you" (this refers to the Armageddon of the last days Rev 16:16;Joel 3:1-2). 4:12 - The many nations will be like sheaves for threshing. 4:12 - "horns of iron" (horn is a symbol of power and iron is strong) given to the Daughter of Zion (probably the faithful believers both Jew and Gentile). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
3:1-3 - A denunciation of the leaders, princes, priests and prophets of Israel and Judah. Instead of being shepherds to the flock they had become butchers feeding on the flock. Perhaps an echo of 70 AD also when some literally ate their own children. 3:4 - In their day of judgment they will cry out to the Lord but He will turn His face from them. 3:5-7 - The condemnation of false prophets (Matt 7:15) who proclaim good news when they are fed and bad news when they aren't. These false prophets would have no new "revelations" during captivity as their sufferings reduced them to silence; also, there were no true prophets from Malachi (circa 397 BC) to the days of Christ. 3:8 - Micah, a true prophet sent to Judah and Israel, points out their sinful ways and contrasts himself with the false prophets. 3:9 - Back to condemnation of the rulers who distorted all that is right and despised God's judgment. 3:10 - Rulers who build Zion (initially a mount in Jerusalem, then including Jerusalem and to later include Israel) with bloodshed and Jerusalem with wickedness. 3:11 - Leaders, priests and false prophets were all corrupted with payoffs but had blind arrogance in thinking their worship was acceptable (Titus 1:16;Luke 18:9-14) and that the Lord was pleased and would bring no disaster on them. They had a false sense of security. 3:12 - Impending judgment of Zion being plowed like a field and Jerusalem a heap of rubble, etc. Hezekiah responded to Micah not Isaiah (2Kin 20:16-19). Judgment happened about 150 years later in the reign of Zedekiah despite a later warning to Judah (Jer 7:1-15). Some tried to persuade Jehoiakim to put Jeremiah to death but elders siting Micah's prophecy and Hezekiah's example saved his life (Jer 26:19-25). Nebuchadnezzar partly fulfilled God's judgments in 621 BC and 586 BC when Jerusalem was destroyed, then by Antiochus in the second century BC and finally with the Romans in 70 AD. The actual plowing of Zion is thought to have taken place under Emperor Hadrian in 135 AD. The inferred lesson for us is how acceptable is our worship? Are we at risk for deluding ourselves? Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
EVERLASTING GOD We don't have to be like everyone else. They might worship their movie stars, sports heros and singers, fast cars, fashion and finances, but we will worship the LORD our God. It was Micah who said a statement just like this. He said, "All the nations may walk in the name of their gods; we will walk in the name of our God for ever and ever." (Mic 4:5) The big difference between the gods people worship and the LORD is that other gods have no future. If they are people, they will be dead in a few short years. If they are possessions, they can be reduced or gone before we know it. Added to how temporary everything is, is the fact that no other gods can do anything for us. They cannot save. The LORD, on the other hand will work powerfully in our lives if we let him. He loves us personally and has promised us an eternity with him. Why be like everyone else with no future? "We will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever." Notice how Micah makes us focus on eternity by saying "for ever and ever," and that his statement comes directly after a prophecy that takes Israel into a very bright and eternal future. Like Micah, let's take time to focus on eternity and then dedicate our whole selves to the LORD, the only true, living and eternal God. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
| Mic 4:7 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King Jesus will be the future King. For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
Mic 4:1-4 First Principles>Sure Mercies of David>Government Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
| Mic 4:7-8 First Principles>Sure Mercies of David>People>Israel Since the Kingdom of God is the Kingdom of Israel Restored, Israel will be the people of God's Kingdom Isa 55:1-3, Psa 69:36-36, Mic 4:7-8. First Principles>Sure Mercies of David>People> For more information go to Isa 55:1-3 Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
v2,7,8 First Principles>Sure Mercies of David>Capital City>Jerusalem Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
4:10 Micah is more specific than Isaiah in his judgements upon Babylon – Isa 14:15– however they both make the same point which causes one to wonder why Hezekiah was so quick to show the ambassadors from Babylon his wealth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.8
- The point of this small and well known verse, is to offer assurance that
the same Jesus who was able to save, and whose work saved, through faith,
even those which came before him, is able still to save us in these far
off days. ch.1:2. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Entertaining
strangers - Hebrews
13:1 - could have been a very risky experience which may well have
deterred the brethren and sisters from manifesting that hospitality which
is expected of brethren and sisters. The unbelieving Jews sought every opportunity to persecute the brethren and so one could expect them to turn up at one's home at any time. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 13:20
Everlasting covenant quotes 2
Samuel 23:5 where David speaks of the wonderful things that God had
promised him. So associated with the Melchisedec priesthood we see the promises
to David - a reason why David behaved as a priest when he brought the ark
to Zion. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| :13
'without the camp' would take on greater significance than that mentioned
in our comments in June when the Romans came against Jerusalem and finally
overthrew it in AD 70. Those who did not flee the city when the opportunity
presented itself would not survive. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 13:15 The 'sacrifice of praise' Is the peace offering (Lev 7:11-12). Likewise our prise is a sacrifice. So we do well to think on whose pleasure is our primary concern when we want to sing to Him. Are we singing because the tune pleases us or because the words reflect what is in our thankful hearts? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.20 Blood is a perishing thing. God immortalized Jesus because of obedience. God required of him that he should suffera violent death as a vindication of God's rightousness, and as a foundation on which to offer us forgiveness. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
13:23 In saying that Timothy ‘is set at liberty’ we learn that Timothy had spent some time in prison – the language matches that of Paul’s own comment abut himself Acts 26:32 . This detail is not recorded in any of the historical data un the New Testament about Timothy. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| There is a very unfortunate chapter division here which makes us assume that the culmination of the argument in Heb 1-12 is "For our God is a consuming fire". It is rather "let brotherly love continue". This brotherly love is then demonstrated by reference to the relationship of Abraham to Lot in Gen 18. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
13:10 The fellowship of the first century brethren was exclusive – that is it they had to decide whether their confidence was in the law of Moses or in the sacrifice of Jesus. If they trusted in the law of Moses then the sacrifice of Christ was of no value to them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.23 There is no record of Timothy's being in prison. And so, the term set at liberty (KJV) means sent away. This is probably referring to Paul's sending Timothy to Macedonia. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
There are a multitude of references in this chapter to Lot in the Old Testament.
Try looking through Genesis and see how many times Lot's goods are mentioned. There's a lot of them. This chapter focusses in on this man who got it all absolutely wrong. He had been with Abraham, the receiver of the promises. Yet he had left Abraham because he coveted the lifestyle of Sodom. We need to be like Abraham who dwelled in tents; content with what we have; because it is to such that the promises are made (13:14). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
|
13:11 In speaking of the ‘odes’ which were burned ‘without the camp’ the writer is taking the Jews – particularly the priests that believed – back to reflect upon the detail of the Law of Moses, for example in Num 6:30 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
GOD PROVIDES God is never going to ask us to do something that we cannot do. He will not send us out under resourced because he wants his work done well and glory to be given to him. The writer's blessing to the Hebrews illustrates this well when he says, 'May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will, and may he work in us what is pleasing to him, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen." (Heb 13:20-21) Nothing is too hard for God. Possibly one of the hardest things anyone could ever do is to raise the dead. God raised Jesus from the dead, and not only raised him from the dead after he had been dead three days, but also gave him everlasting life. If God can raise the dead, it is an easy thing for him to provide us with whatever we need to effectively do his will. Whether we need people, money, resources, or time, God is able to provide it. We may even need someone's mind changed so that we can effectively get on with the task God has given us. He can do it. All we need to do is ask. If it is his will that the work be done and we have prayed about it, he will provide all that is needed. God will provide all we need for his work to be done. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
13:17 Those ‘who have the rule over you’ must be the elders in the church at Jerusalem. It cannot be the Jewish authorities – they would have the brethren turn away from Christ and back to the Law of Moses. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||