February 11

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Exodus  21
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Exodus 21 online in the King James Version
Listen to Exodus 21 online in the New International Version

 

v.5,6 - The idea that here there was an instruction to use the judges means that this institution, which appears (ch.18:17-24) to have come from Moses' father-in-law, obviously had God's blessing. God is therefore not averse to man making judgements, though the men have to be well chosen to stand the responsibility and to give spiritually correct answers. As well as this, here in v.6 we have a picture of lifelong commitment, requiring the sacrifice of substantial pain (albeit short term). Notice that the serving for ever was motivated by his love for his master (God), his spouse (Jesus) and his children (Brethren and Sisters). Ps.40:6-8 (the word opened in v.6 means to dig or excavate - clearly a reference back to today's chapter).
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.17 represents the respect that God expects us to show for our parents - as a training ground for the showing of respect to our Heavenly father. The rules regarding respect for parents seem much harsher than most others, and serious consequences ensue from what seem on the surface to be relatively less serious crimes. We must consider what God is meaning us to learn from this.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
v.5-6 The way in which the way a servant could dedicate himself to his master forms a pattern of our service to God. This was exemplified in the way in which Jesus gave himself over to his Father's work. So the idea :6 of the pierced ear is taken up in Psalm 40:6 and then on into Hebrews 10:5.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
The provision regarding the servant is the provision of the year of release which is developed in more detail in Leviticus 25.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
On this day in 1861, Bro Thomas wrote the preface to the first volume of Eureka.
 
Exodus 21 - The laws in this chapter relate to the fifth and sixth commandments; and though they differ from our times and customs, nor are they binding on us, yet they explain the moral law under which Israel now found herself, and the rules of natural justice. The servant, in the state of servitude, was an emblem of that state where man finds himself in bondage to sin. The law, brings man face to face with his God, because by his sins he is robbing God of his glory. However, the Law is based on "Not" teaching. That is, man learns under the Law largely what God is NOT. However, in God's Grace through Jesus Christ, we have learned what God IS. So this, says Jesus, "is life eternal that they might KNOW THEE the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent" - John 17:3. Likewise, back in Exodus 21, a servant in being made free, was an emblem of that liberty wherewith Christ, the Son of God, makes free from bondage His people, who are now free indeed - Romans 8:1; and made so freely, without money and without price, through the grace of God - John 8:32.

Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
21:6 That the servant is brought to the ‘door post’ with his ear ‘bored’ is maybe an indication that the servant would listen to the law – which was to be written ‘ upon the door posts of thine house’ (Deut 11:20)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Exo 21:15,17  The rules regarding respect for parents are a far cry from what we see in society to day. Here in Canada the laws are almost opposite of these given to Moses. It is illegal to spank a child, ( this has been changed recently, so a parent can spank a child lightly) as a matter of fact children are encouraged to report to the police if they are physically punished by a parent. We are reminded of the words penned by Solomon. Prov 22:6,15
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

The "Judgements" which God told Moses to set before the people (v1) started with service. The same applies to us.


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
The idea of slavery is abhorrent today, at least in the minds and laws of westerners.  However, is not categorically condemned in the Bible, neither in the Old nor the New Testaments.
We must remember that there were brethren and sisters who were slaves, even slaves owned by other brethren. The story of Onesimus and Philemon is an example of this.  What is important to the believer in Christ is not the condition in which s/he is found in this life (Phil 4:11, Heb 13:5) but his/her freedom from the bondage of sin (1Cor 12:13, Gal 3:28, Col 3:11). Christ has made us free from sin which, paradoxically, has made us all servants (slaves) of God (Rom 6:22).

Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

V.2 Every Israelite was free-born, but slavery was permitted under certain restrictions. A Hebrew might be made a slave through poverty, debt, or crime; but at the end of six years he was entitled to freedom, and his wife, if she had voluntarily shared his state of bondage, also obtained release. Should he however, have married a female slave, she and the children, after the husband's liberation, remained the master's property; and if, through attachment to his family, the Hebrew chose to forfeit his privilege and abide as he was, a formal process was gone through in a public court, and a brand of servitude was put thru his ear. (Psa 40:6)  This was for life. In many ways, this is similar to our commitment at baptism, for life.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
v.4, if I am reading it correctly, seems to cite the exact situation in which Jacob found himself with Laban, many years earlier.  Had this rule existed then, he would have been forced to leave Rachel and Leah with their father and leave alone.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter
The Law allowed for Hebrews to be servants (slaves) for six years.  However, they had to be freed on the seventh year (v.2).  The seventh year was the time of release - the Great Sabbath - the Day of Rest. Yahweh was showing His people the pattern of His grace towards them.  Likewise, we are servants (slaves) of Yahweh in this dispensation (viz. six years (days)) (Rom 6:22).   We look forward to our release when Jesus returns to set up His Kingdom on the seventh year (day) (Matt 25:23,34).   
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

21:29    The specific mention of the ox which pushed with it’s horns is typical of the Jewish leaders who opposed Jesus as indicated in Psa 22:12

 


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
V.2 It was lawful under the Law for one to own and control a slave. A man might possess a human or an animal, providing he used it, in mercy and truth, as other parts of the Law required. When compared with the practices and principles of the Egyptians and other nations, it is easy to see the superiority of the laws given to Israel.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
v16 reminds me of the situation of Joseph being kidnapped by his brothers & sold. They would have received the death sentence under the law. Joseph, though, later deals with them mercifully.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Wendy

 

The Law recognizes that all life is a gift from Yahweh and, therefore, precious. Life is to be respected, even that of the unborn (vs. 22,23).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

21:2  Unlike the way in which Egypt dealt with servants - remember Joseph as sold and there was no opportunity for freedom from the bondage of slaver for him - God ensures that a man or woman cannot be sold forever.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

21:17   This judgement is hardly surprising given the commandment ‘honour thy father and mother …’ – Exo 20:21


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.2 The welfare of a Hebrew servant was governed by strict guidelines.  His servitude was always a voluntary act and never forced.  The person who was not able to generate enough wherewithals to exist independently became a servant to a household where he earned his keep.  After the end of six years, he had the option of staying or leaving the household.  If he chose to leave, he was to be given goods to enable him to make a fresh start (Deut 15:12-15).  This mirrors the mercy of Yahweh as He brought His people out of slavery in Egypt with substance (Exo 12:35-38).  The servant had to be released in the fiftieth year, the year of jubilee (Lev 25:10,54,55).  If the Hebrew had been sold to an alien living with Israel, he could be redeemed at any time by a relative (Lev 25:47-49).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

21:13-15 The law has already specified ‘thou shalt not kill’ – Exo 20:13- and now the law deals with accidental death.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.23-25 These verses have been abused by those justifying personal revenge in kind. But, these directives seek to avoid any personal revenge. They show that the judge trying a case will make compensation to the injured party to the full value of the injury. Those that misuse these verses confuse a civil code with a moral precept. Jesus, remarking on these verses, shows the appropriate moral application (Matt 5:38-42).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
Exo 21:17;Matt 15:4;Mark 7:10.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

Exo 21:32 - 30 shekels of silver was the amount of money paid to Judas to betray the Lord (Matt 26:15;Zech 11:12-13). In order to effect the atonement for believers, the Lord "took upon him the form of a servant" (Phil 2:7), and in his death was figuratively gored by a bull. Christ was a slave to his Father's will and initially to mortality. As Peter Forbes noted in his 2006 comments, the leaders of Jewry who secured Christ's death are likened to "bulls of Bashan," ready to attack him (Psa 22:12-13).

Some of the above was gleaned from The Book of Exodus: The Christadelphian Expositor, H.P. Mansfield, p.278.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

21:26-27 The provision that if a servant is injured by his master he shall go free indicates that servants must be treated with respect. Even though the servant is the property of the owner he is not allowed to behave towards the servant as he pleases.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
These are the first "judgements" given to Israel, after the Commandments. The judgements are ways in which to decide in a court of law. They are principles to govern daily life and society as a whole. They ensure fairness and justice is upheld. Other nations would look at these laws and see how far above their own wisdom Gods judgements in Isrealite society were (Deut 4:5-8). They would directly contribute to the stability and prosperity of the nation which would be like a beacon to the Gentiles (Isa 42:1-4 is speaking initially of Israel, cp. 44:1-2). Do we see the law in this light? David said "Oh, how I love Your law! I think about it all the time!" (Psa 119:97).
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob
Reading 2 - Psalm 74
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 74 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 74 online in the New International Version

 

v.2 - Lots of connections here throughout the scripture. Israel were (and we now are as well) God's congregation, God's holy people, the redeemed of the Lord (Isa.51:11) - who also come to Zion - the place where we can dwell with God - Jesus. It was purchased by God - purchased of course by the blood of Jesus (Acts 20:28). Let us remind ourselves of the position of great privilege in which we find ourselves - Ps.33:12, Deut.4:20, 32:9, Jer.10:16, Isa.62:12, Tit.2:14, Rev.5:9.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.1 (Title) - This Asaph was son of Berechiah - and was the chief (1Chr.15:17-19, 16:5) of David's musicians. Was this Psalm (and Psalm 78) written by him, or written for him? If it was for him , then that would not be the first time - 1Chr.16:7
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
In this Psalm the Psalmist thinks about the way that God brought Israel from Egypt. Here are some of the verbal allusions.
:1 anger smoke Deuteronomy 29:20
:2 which thou hast purchased Exodus 15:16
:11 Plucked out of thy bosom Exodus 4:7
:13 Divide the sea Exodus 14:21
:14 meat to the people Numbers 14:9

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
David is thinking like this because the sanctuary is desolate (:1-9). This prompts the Psalmist to question why God does not seem interested (:10)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Psalm 74 - It appears almost certain that this Psalm is from Hezekiah's time, when the Assyrian went through the land destroying all Israel's places of worship.
 
Psalm 74:4-6 - NEB translates "The shouts of Thy enemies filled the Holy Place, they planted their standards there as tokens of victory. They brought it crashing down, like woodmen plying their axes in the forest; they ripped the carvings clean out, they smashed them with hatchet and pick." Obviously this was a traumatic time for the nation as the enemy went throughout the land, destroying all that Israel had established. Sadly the people in the land must once more endure the Assyrian, the Northern Confederacy headed by Russia, going through the land and wreaking havoc in their final rampage against God's people - Daniel 11:40-45.

Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
74:23 Whilst Israel’s enemies would doubtless have thought that they were rising against the nations David clearly understood correctly when he spoke of the enemies rising against God. A recurring theme – Hezekiah saw the taunt as a challenge to God for example.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Psalm 74  This Psalm was written late in the history of Israel.(before Christ) The writer pleads with God to restore Israel to favour and destroy their enemies.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

Sometimes we think that God is for us, when in reality He's not. Sometimes we think that, because He answered our prayers in some mighty way, He is with us. We think we're special. We can start to think nothing we do will be without His blessing.

This was the problem that Israel struggled with ever after their miraculous deliverance from Egypt. Through the wilderness they continually quoted the fact that they were now God's people in order to justify the way they were behaving (Num 12:2, 16:3). This continued right through till the time of Jesus and beyond (Matt 3:9) .

Why, we ask ourselves, if God is with us, is everything going wrong? (vs 1,11) Before we know it, we have strayed so far from the paths of God, that God has had to turn His hand against us and chasten us in order to bring us back. It can be the very blessings of God that have directly contributed to our going astray. It can be the visible hand of God in our lives, through miraculous answered prayer, that lifts us up in pride, and makes us forget that it is God doing the delivering, and not us. We can get too big for our boots.

In v7, Asaph calls God's people His Turtledove. Jeremiah tells us that this is only if we act like the animal itself. If we are to claim to be God's people, we should be acting like people of God. "Even the stork in the heavens knows her appointed times; And the turtledove, the swift, and the swallow observe the time of their coming. But My people do not know the judgment of the LORD." (Jer 8:7).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Rob

 

V.8 This is the only place where the word synagogues is used in the Old Testament.  It is derived from the Hebrew word mo'ed meaning an assembly or congregation, brought together ostensibly for celebrating set religious festivals.  The more formal structure which we relate to as a synagogue was a feature of the post-exilic age.  Solomon's temple had been destroyed and Jews could not centralize there.  And so they began to meet in their own locales. Even after Zerubbabel's temple had been completed, the meetings in the synagogues continued.

In Christ's time, although the magnificently refurbished Herod's temple shone in the brilliant Jerusalem sun, synagogue worship still flourished (Matt 4:23).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

This psalm is in two parts. The first 9 verses (Psa 74:1-9) is telling God how evil people have been against Him. Then Psa 74:10-23 seems to be asking God to punish these wicked and godless people.  Of course we do not have to tell God anything. He knows it all.  But it's obviously a good thing (because the psalm is inspired), for us to list the evil deeds of people who have sinned against God.  We mustn't judge, but such an exercise, where we pray to God and tell Him all the evil we have seen today, can only do us good. At the very least, we remind ourselves of the huge difference between right and wrong.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
v.1 - In asking the question 'Why doth thine anger smoke against the sheep of thy pasture?' the psalmist almost seems to be doing what so many who do not understand God do - make God into what we men think He should be, instead of giving Him the ultimate power and glory and questioning nothing that He does.  Maybe it is just the poetic language, but it comes over this way to me.  God certainly does have good reason to have anger against us, so let us throw ourselves on His mercy, which is great.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

74:18   That the enemy had ‘reproached’ and ‘blasphemed’ moved the Psalmist to ask God to intervene and deliver his sol (vs. 19). The true servant of God will be more concerned about how his God is viewed in the world than how the world views him.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

 

The crushing of sea monsters and Leviathan (vs.13,14) is indicative of Yahweh's defeat of Egypt. Egypt (Rahab) epitomizes sin (idolatry) which Yahweh overcame (Isa 51:9,10). The Lord Jesus, likewise, overcame sin for all humankind, by crushing the head of the serpent (Gen 3:15).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

71:1-2  On seeing that nation as suffering God’s anger the Psalmist calls upon God to remember the people that He had purchased. This is similar to Moses, when God would have destroyed them, asking God to remember what he had promised to the fathers. - Exo 32:10-13


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
As we read through this Psalm, we could not avoid noting how often the word "THOU" is repeated. As the psalmist lists the miraculous deeds that God has provided. "Why hast THOU cast us off for ever?" "Remember thy congregation, which THOU hast purchased"; " Why withdrawest THOU thy hand?" again in verses 12,14,15,16, and 17. We understand that the Hebrew word ATTENAH appears some 17 times in the Psalm. When something is continually repeated it has to have a special message. We all must be God centered in our thinking, and in our pleas to Him for help,
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John
As we read through this Psalm, we could not avoid noting how often the word "THOU" is repeated. As the psalmist lists the miraculous deeds that God has provided. "Why hast THOU cast us off for ever?" "Remember thy congregation, which THOU hast purchased"; " Why withdrawest THOU thy hand?" again in verses 12,14,15,16, and 17. We understand that the Hebrew word ATTENAH appears some 17 times in the Psalm. When something is continually repeated it has to have a special message. We all must be God centered in our thinking, and in our pleas to Him for help,
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

74:11-14
Pluck it out of thy bosom
divide the sea
gavest him to be meat to the people

 Here the Psalmist makes three references to events in the wandering in the wilderness


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

74:8 The word translated ‘synagogues’ <04150> is only once translated such. More typically it is translated ‘set time’ – Gen 17:12 or ‘congregation’ – Exo 28:43 so we see the Psalmist is indicating a meetings of people at an appointed or set time.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.1 The figure of smoke expresses Yahweh’s anger and displeasure. By touching the earth, in His anger, Yahweh would make the earth smoke (Psa 104:32; 144:5). Interestingly, a popular term for the most powerful tornado (Category 5) is called The Finger of God, because people have likened it to God dragging His finger across the land.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

74:14 ‘Leviathan’ is used elsewhere in Scripture – Job 41:1 to speak of an animal. However here it seems that the prophet is using the sword to speak of Egypt long before the prophet does so - Isa 27:1


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Mark  7
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Mark 7 online in the King James Version
Listen to Mark 7 online in the New International Version

 

v.7 - This has been a problem throughout the ages. Human nature adores tradition. We feel great security in repeated ritual. It is essential, as Jesus says here, that we separate in our minds those things which are doctrine from those which are tradition and give each its true place in our hearts. From the start God was concerned that his commandments remained untouched by human thinking (Deut.12:32). So let us heed carefully the message of passages like Tit.3:9, Jas.1:26, Col.2:20-23, Rev.22:18.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.13 That it is possible to make the word of God void and of none effect by the way that we make our own rules should really make us careful about how we make our own rules to 'make life easy' for ourselves.
v.31 When Jesus passed through Decapolis he was passing through the area where Legion, when he had been healed, went talking about Jesus Mark 5:20.
v.36 A regular feature of the gospels is that Jesus did not want those who had been healed to spread that abroad. Matthew 8:4 9:30 12:16 16:20 Mark 1:44 3:12 5:43 8:30 Luke 5:14 8:56 His desire was that people would come to him because of his word and not just for the miracles [or the bread]

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
:6-7 The way in which the 'people' were vain in their worship because they had replaced the things God required by their own traditions should serve as a powerful warning to us.

We must ask ourselves, with respect to all the procedures that we adopt in our lives, whether they accord with what Scripture teaches or whether the procedures are designed to enable us to avoid thinking about the will of our Father and how it should be implemented in our daily and ecclesial lives.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
RULES AND TRADITIONS

Most rules and traditions have their basis in a principle or a belief. For example, the rule that says we should wear safety glasses when using power tools is based on the safety principle of "prevention is better than cure." The rule is good in its self, but if the principle is better served by wearing a face shield, then the rule of wearing safety glasses becomes obsolete.

The Pharisees had made traditions and rules around the principles given in the Law of Moses. Essentially they were a hedge around the law to prevent people from breaking the law, and in a way, it worked well. But in other ways it went too far because the people lost sight of God's laws due to all the other rules they had to watch out for. Jesus said to them, "You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men." (Mark 7 v 8).

We too can be governed by a multitude of rules and traditions intended to help us serve God, but which occasionally become a burden or hindrance. Our worship music, Bible Version, dress code, times of meetings, order of services or layout of a plan are all things that are based on principles yet are often enforced by rules. So let us consider the principles behind the rules and re-evaluate our standing before God.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
:24-30 It may seem puzzling that Jesus went to gentile territory and then, when the gentile woman asked Jesus to heal her daughter. It might seem reasonable to ask 'why go there if he was not going to heal anyone or preach the gospel?' The way that Jesus responded was designed to enable the woman to show that she had great faith. Not for her benefit but for the benefit of those Jews that were with Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Mark 7:19 - "purging all meats" - Another translation has this, "Making all meats clean." The NKJV has "Thus purifying all foods" - This was a radical departure from 1500 years of ingrained and inbred tradition and Law. It was a total shock to the mind of the Jew, and we find Peter still grappling with the concept years later in the record of the Acts.
Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

7:1 When the record tells us that the Pharisees and certain of the scribes had come from Jerusalem we should realise that they had traveled some 60 miles. This gives us an indication as to how concerned the religious leaders in Jerusalem were about Jesus.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Mark 7:29  For this saying go thy way  The Lord was aware of the merits of her confession. She knew that He was opening a wider door than Judaism would have allowed. She believed that Gentiles as well as Jews could partake of the Hope of Israel. Her daughter would be cured as a sign of the Hope to come.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
After the healing of Legion (see my note on Mark 5), Jesus encountered the Syrophenician woman who begged him to heal her mentally ill daughter (Mark 7:25,26).  Jesus explained to her that His prime mission was to the house of Israel (Matt 15:24) but her faith showed that His mission also extended to the Gentiles.  This was the lesson that was meant to be understood.  To highlight this, Jesus travelled through the Decapolis (the ten Gentile cities of the Galilee) healing the sick (Mark 7:31-37).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
v.11 - Throughout this discourse we see the importance of living by God's rules in faith.  We must resist the human tendency to place extra rules btween us and God - rules which God has not enforced - the keeping of which makes us feel more righteous.  Righteousness comes only from God and only to those who are justified by faith.  We need to keep this important principle paramount in our minds, for by it, and it only, can we be saved.  Rom 3:20,28
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

7:17     In coming to ask Jesus about the parable his disciples are showing the true qualities of a disciple - they were learners. We should never be too proud to pretend that we know the answer when we do not. We should seek the answer from someone we think will be able to help.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
The Lord Jesus was sent first of all to the Jews. The promise to Abraham was coming true in Him, and therefore all nations would be blessed in Him (Gen 12:3) – but it had to be to the house of Israel first. Therefore in today’s chapter (Mark 7:25-30), the Lord let the Gentile woman know that it wasn’t right to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.  It was a test. What was good for Jews was equally good for Gentiles. She passed the test, and received the miracle she was so desperate to have.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

 

The incident of Jesus' healing the deaf man with the speech impediment seems strange (vs.32-35). The Lord could have healed the man by just saying the word, like the healing of the Gentile woman's daughter. However, the Lord put his fingers in his ears and touched his tongue. Why this demonstration? I think the Lord was drawing attention to the spiritual wantonness of the Jews. They had stopped up their ears against hearing and understanding the Truth (Zech 7:11); and had shown, by their rhetoric, pride and arrogance, a contrary attitude to the spirit of Truth (Psa 12:3,4). As the Lord could unblock physical impediments (v.34), he could also open the way to eternal life to those willing to change their ways (John 3:15).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

7:6-8  There was nothing inherently wrong with the hand washing that the religious Jews did and expected everyone else to do. The problem was that their tradition replaced God’s law. A set of rules which can simply be obeyed without any thought kills spiritual growth. In the same way we can prevent ourselves from growing spiritually by thinking that our lives should be determined by a set of rules.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

7:2   Now the Pharisees see the disciples eat bread with unwashed hands – That is they did not follow the ceremonial rules that the Jews introduced. So the disciples are criticised for eating. Jesus – Mark 6:42– had fed the 5,000. So Jesus fed the people. The Jewish leaders criticised the people for eating! The bread represented teaching.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

7:17 so we see again – see Mark 4:10– the disciples asking for an explanation of the parables. Jesus used the parables to separate those who were interested in his message from those who were not. Those who were interested went and enquired further. Is this our attitude to Scripture?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Mark likes to record key Aramaic words that Jesus used. Of course, the common language of the region was Aramaic. In this chapter he records Corban = consecrated gift (v.11); Ephphath = Be opened (v.34). Other examples of Aramaic words and phrases are:

Boanerges = Sons of Thunder (3:17)

Talitha cumi  = girl rise (5:41)

Abba  = father (14:36)

Eloi eloi lama sabachthani?  = My God, My God why have you left me? (15:34)


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

CAN'T KEEP QUIET

 

One of the themes that runs through the gospel of Mark is that no matter how hard Jesus tried to keep things quiet, people continued to tell people about him, the crowds continued to grow, while he and the disciples were unable to get any rest.

 

Take, for example, his time in Tyre. "He entered a house and did not want anyone to know it; yet he could not keep his presence a secret. In fact, as soon as she heard about him, a woman whose little daughter was possessed by an evil spirit came and fell at his feet." (Mark 7:24-25)

 

And agan, after healing the deaf and mute man, "Jesus commanded them not to tell anyone. But the more he did so, the more they kept talking about it." (v 36)

 

Looking around, I think the opposite is more of a problem today. Jesus, no longer wearied by crowds flocking to him, has told us to go out and spread the good news. But do we? Even when they were told not to, the people were so impressed by Jesus that they came to him and told others about him anyway. We have seen and heard so much more about Jesus in the Scriptures, through history and in our lives, yet I get the impression that many of us would have liked Jesus to tell us not to tell anyone.

 

Let us have the enthusiasm of those people through the gospels that had an encounter with Jesus. After our encounter with him, we should not be able to help loving him and telling others about him.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Robert

7:24 Having been rejected, so to speak, by the Jews Jesus went to the gentiles by going to Tyre.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
32-33  Do the things we say and the things we listen to have the touch of the master? 
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken