|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
14 - There is no doubt
that the covering of the tabernacle is symbolic of God's care and of the covering
for sin effected in Jesus' death and resurrection by grace. Here we see a red
(sinful - blood) covering covered over with the grace of God. It constitutes a
refuge for us to go into in Christ. Ps.27:5,
Isa.4:6, 25:4, Ezek.16:10 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v1
- ch.36:8
tells us that it was the 'wise hearted' that were involved in this work - not
that God needed all this ceremony to satisfy some sense of pride or power over
mankind, but because man needed it in order to learn how great his creator was.
Let us not get our worship out of perspective. Let us lay store by the praise
of our heavenly Father, and not by the ritual by which we do it. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.31-33
In speaking of the veil which divided the holy from the most holy place we are
given a great amount of detail. However the New Testament comment is that it is
'the flesh' Hebrews
10:20. We must take care that we do not get so bound up in the fine detail
of the tabernacle that we overlook the basic message. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :24
In saying that the boards were to be 'coupled' together we are introduced to an
idea which is applied to Jerusalem (Psalm
122:3) where the same word is translated as 'compacted'. The tabernacle was
a shadow of something more permanent - the city which has foundations. That is
not Jerusalem which now is but the heavenly Jerusalem. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Exodus
26:1-14 - The Coverings of the Tabernacle are here described for us. The ceiling
of the Tabernacle was made of a curtain of fine twined (or 'doubled') linen embroidered
with cherubim in scarlet, purple and blue. A lot of work needed to be employed
to create blue and purple cloth in the ancient world, for the basis of these colours
is extremely rare, and extremely costly. These colours were derived from a certain
shellfish of the Mediterranean, the Helix ianthina of Linnaeus. Many thousands
of these creatures needed to be crushed and processed to create even a little
of the concentrated colour required to colour a garment. Over the ceiling of the
Tabernacle there was a further tent or covering, made of (1) Badger's Skin - the
"badger" is thought by Strongs to be a clean animal, possibly a type of antelope,
(2) Ram's skin dyed red, (3) Goat's hair. All these materials point forward to
Christ. The 'Antelope' skins were dyed blue in colour, reminding Israel of their
Holy calling - Numbers
15:38; Deuteronomy 22:12. The Ram's skins pointed forward to the "Lamb of
God" sacrificed to take away the sin of the world. The covering of Goat's hair
reminded the Israelite further of the sin-offering and the covering involved which
likewise pointed forward to Christ - Hebrews
9:11-22. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
| v.
14
- "badgers" some say seals from the Red Sea; if so, the Red Sea would
remind the Israelites of God's providential care. In the Vulgate, the skins were dyed BLUE . . . . . . blue for (God). Sherry Luskin [Santa Barbara (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Sherry |
||||||||||
| 26:30 The repetition of the command that the tabernacle should be built according to the pattern shown really makes it clear that God requires that things of His making be made as He requires. The ecclesia is His building. We must, therefore, realise that the way in which we ‘build’ it must be according to the pattern laid out in Scripture. Man made rules are not acceptable. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The Tabernacle had to be able to be dismantled. God’s wonderful plans for His first earthly house obviously were designed for the type of life they lived. There has never been another nation with whom God had such a personal relationship. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
|
The skins mentioned for the tabernacle are significant (v.14): - The ram's skin, dyed red, signified the shed blood of Jesus. - The badger's skin. The badger was an unclean animal and was not found in the east. And so, some think that an antelope was meant, others think sea creatures like seals or porpoises. These skins, of whatever animal, were dyed blue which signified heavenly grace. The natural black goat's skin, of which the tent was made, signified the natural sin of Israel. Thus, sacrifice and grace were necessary to overcome sin to bring salvation. There would have been other skins used to wrap up the tabernacle for transportation. The tabernacle was a temporary dwelling which looked forward in symbol and function to future permanence.Paul echoes this situation when he talks of shedding our temporary mortal tabernacle for the permanent mantle of immortality (2Cor 5:2-4). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| UNDER THE COVERS The tabernacle is a lot like the word of God. As it is described to us here we find that it's inner covering is made from something really beautiful. "Make the tabernacle with ten curtains of finely twisted linen and blue, purple and scarlet yarn, with cherubim worked into them by a skilled craftsman." (Exo 26:1) No doubt this was some of the finest fabric ever made and was fit for the King - God himself. But not everyone got to see this beautiful creation. Over the top of it were curtains of goat hair - not nearly so beautiful but needed for the tabernacle all the same. Again, not everyone got to see the craftsmanship that went into the weaving of the goats hair curtains because they in turn were covered by rams skins dyed red. That must have been an interesting sight but even they were covered by the final covering of hides of sea cows. All that was seen from the outside of the tabernacle was black or gray oily sea cow skins. In a way the Bible is very similar. All we see from the outside is the cover and the words, and often, like the hides of sea cows, it doesn't look very inviting. But as we get further in we discover God's love letter written to us in blood, the blood of his only son given for us. And as we look further still we learn of God's righteousness and of the glory of God. It doesn't look exciting on the outside, but the more we read it, the more we study it, the deeper we go, the more we will discover that it is more than we ever dreamed of, with treasures beyond our imaginations just hidden beneath the surface. Open it and read it today to discover the treasures that are hidden between its covers. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| V.15-30 The tabernacle, from its name as well as from its general appearance and arrangements, was a tent; but from the description given in these verses, the boards that formed its walls, the five cross bars that strengthened them, and the middle bar that "reached from end to end" gave it solidity. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| v.31 - It was clear from this that God cared very much what it looked like, down to the finest detail. There is a great debate in our community, and I guess there always will be, over whether it matters what things look like, and the opinions range from one extreme to the other. I suppose what we must asses is whether the appearance that God demanded here was for the look of it or for the spiritual significance of it. We need also to bear in mind that the ritual of the Old Covenant is not matched (indeed is opposed) in the New, in which we stand by grace. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26 All the details given show that the tabernacle was to be a moveable structure that could be dismantled and moved easily thus showing that Israel were not to view the wilderness as a permanent resting place. This would have to wait for the tie when the temple was built and the staves were taken out of the ark. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| BIBLE STUDY EXPOSED Imagine taking a cross section of the tabernacle, or better still, imagine yourself on the roof of the completed tabernacle and peeling it away layer by layer from the outside heading in. The first covering we encounter are the hides of sea cows. From the outside that would be all we see. Not very appealing really. A dark grey covering, nothing to look at, but very practical and weatherproof. Exploring the layers of the tabernacle is a lot like exploring God's word. From the outside it looks like hard work, heavy going, but we can see or have heard of, it's practical benefits. Let's peel back this layer and see what is underneath. The fist thing we notice is a colour change. The underneath layer is of rams skins dyed red. This is significant in that it takes us to the next level in our Bible study, showing us the Lamb of God whose blood was shed in order that God's people could be forgiven and live. Curtains of goat hair are found as the layer under the red ram skins. They give us another colour change from red to white. Here we begin to see, as we explore God's word, God's holiness, righteousness and purity. Then we come to the final cover, the one we have had to dig to find. This is where it gets really exciting as the glory of God, his beauty and majesty is revealed. This is where we see intricate patterns and splendour we would never have imagined. But exploring God's word is only the beginning. On lifting the last layer of the Tabernacle, the glory of God himself, his Son and his light are revealed to us in person. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
26:1 Cherubim figure prominently in the manufacture of the tabernacles. They, so to speak, separated the worshippers from that which was within the tabernacle proper. In the same way that the cherubim turned every way to prevent Adam and Eve from returning to the tree of life - Gen 3:24 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:6 Notice it is ‘one tabernacle’ – clearly they were making one tabernacle so why emphasise that it is one? Clearly because we see in the one tabernacle the perfect fitting together of many elements – a foretaste of how we, the ecclesia, should be. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:12 Pure gold is a very soft metal. The construction of the tabernacle was designed to enable it to be erected and dismantled and moved around at God’s will. If we were making a tabernacle for durability we would probably have used a harder metal to overlay the boards However the tabernacle was designed to reflect God’s glory. God is an ideal material for this, despite it being soft and easily damaged. So are we. We likewise are designed to reflect God’s glory but our ‘appearance’ is easily marred by the knocks of life but we are the material of God’s choosing to reflect His glory. Clearly the lesson is that we should realise the fragile nature we bear – that it is all too easy to damage that reflection of God’s gory in the knocks of life and so try to avoid contact with those elements which will do so. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Exo 26:5-6 - there are numerous mentions of 5 and 50 in this chapter. 5 is thought by many to be a number representing grace or mercy. There were 5 sacrifices (Gen 15:9) of heifer, goat, ram, dove and pigeon; David chose 5 stones, etc. The 50th year is a jubilee of liberty and freedom (Lev 25:8-31,39-41,54) - the number 50 may represent mercy and grace to a multitude and perhaps points to a freedom from sin and death upon Christ's return. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
26:36‘curiously wrought’ is the way in which Jesus in spirit is described – Psa 139:15 - in the Psalm. Here we learn something about messiah in the hangings for the tabernacle. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 79:13
- We are the sheep, the sheep that belong to the shepherd from the previous Psalm
- that shepherd which is David, which is Christ - which is our salvation. So let
us echo the sentiments of this verse, and be prepared to shew forth God's praise
to all generations.
Ps.145:4, Isa.43:21, John 10:11-18. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 80:18
reminds us of the words in John
6:66-69. Those who turned aside and walked no more with Jesus were termed
'disciples'. May we remain amongst those who say 'Lord, to whom shall we go? thou
hast the words of eternal life' Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Psalm
79 - This Psalm catalogues punishments from God for Israel's faithlessness.
As such it becomes a pattern for events future to the time of the Psalmist. v1 is quoted in Lam 1:10 v3 in Jeremiah 14:16 v5 is quoted in Revelation 6:10 v6 in Jeremiah 10:24-25 v10 in Joel 2:17 v13 in Jeremiah 23:1 Psalm
80 - This Psalm speaks of the purchasing of Israel out of Egypt in a similar
way to which Isaiah speaks of the vineyard in chapter 5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| SOMETIMES BAD
THINGS HAPPEN God's people are not exempt from bad things happening to them. In Psalm 79 and Psalm 80 we read of Israel and Jerusalem brought to their knees by foreign invaders. The children of Israel, the people of Jerusalem and Judah were all God's special chosen people. They took a special place in the heart of God. He gave them a land flowing with milk and honey but they sinned against God and failed to uphold their side of the covenant. They had promised to obey God, to have him as their only God, but instead had rejected him and worshipped and served idols instead of the living God. So God did what he said he would do if his people were unfaithful and he brought other armies against them to bring them to their knees and to turn them back to the living God. Israel and Judah suffered greatly under the attacks of these other nations and eventually they were taken from that land altogether. Even though Israel and Judah were God's special people, they still suffered and bad things happened to them. Even though we are Christians bad things may happen to us too. When they do, let us humble ourselves and accept God's way knowing that in the end we will be with those who will praise him for ever. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
79:5 Against the background of the destruction the Psalmist cries 'How long ' which is the cry (Revelation 6:10) 'of the souls under the alter' who clearly are the faithful. Do we sigh and cry for the abominations done (Ezekiel 9:4) or are we complacent about the state of God's land - our inheritance? 80:1 We have an interesting contrast with God being presented both at the 'shepherd' and Him that 'dwellest between the cherubim' On the one hand He is the one who takes care of His flock, on the other he is the one clothed in majesty - also see Exodus 25:22 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
79:8 In saying that they were ‘brought very low’ The Psalmist is seeing the fulfilment of the curses of Deuteronomy 28 in their experiences (See Deut 28:43) 80:2 These three tribes all resided on the West of the tabernacle (Num 2:18,20,22) so this is not an arbitrary grouping of three tribes. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm
79 - ends with the words that appear at the top of Psalm 80 - "To
the chief Musician upon Shoshannim-Eduth."
Psalm
80 begins properly with "A Psalm of David" and ends with
"To the chief Musician upon Gittith."
Psalm
80:8 - "a vine out of Egypt" - A vine can be transplanted,
as this Israelitish vine was, taken out of Egypt and planted in the land of
Israel. Once a vine is well established, it can then spread out further and
further and further, just as Israel will spread from the Mediterranean to the
Euphrates. But a vine is good for only one thing - and that is to bear fruit.
Israel must yet bear fruit to the Glory of the Father and to the honour of His
Family - but they will - and the time for them to do that is so soon. Are we
bringing forth Fruit in our lives, or will we suffer the fate of a "fruitless
vine?" Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
Psalm 79 This Psalm was written at the time of Israel's exile and expresses a deep faith and confidence that God will punish their captors. Psa 79:5 How long? David while being pursued by Saul asks the same question four times. Psa 13:1-2 Psalm 80 A prayer for the restoration of Israel's faith, and for the political reunion of the nation. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
The reference to Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh (80:2) is positional. They occupied the western side of the four-square tribal placement (Num 2:18-24). Thus the appeal to Yahweh for help in Ps. 80 was urgent - please help us before the sun sets this day. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| NO SIN TOO BAD There were some very low times in the history of Israel. This seems to have been one of them. Israel and Judah were prone to sin, and in their sin they often turned right away from the LORD their God. It was for this reason that God would send enemies, famine or disease among his people with the aim of making them turn back to him again. Sometimes it worked and the people would leave their idols and return to the LORD, but for the most part this was short lived. This prayer of Asaph may have been one of those prayers that helped Israel to return to the LORD. His description of the state of the nation is nothing to be envied, but we know from history that God did turn back to his people several times even though they had done so wickedly. Are we really that different to Israel? Are we so far from sin that we do not have to repent and pray for restoration from the LORD our God? No, of course not! The encouragement we can get from Israel is that even though their sins were so bad and God had rejected them, he returned to his people when they pleaded for restoration. In the same way, no matter how bad we are, we can always be forgiven if we just repent and pray that God will restore us. "Restore us, O LORD God Almighty; make your face shine upon us, that we may be saved." (Psa 80:19) Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
The passage about God's vine brought out of Egypt (Psa 80:8-19), together with Isa 5:1-7, obviously gives rise to Christ's comments in John 15:1-14 about Him being the true vine. This is similar to Hos 11:1, where God's Son brought out of Egypt is primarily speaking of Israel the nation, but also of Jesus, God's Son. The vine is Israel and Jesus.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
79:8 - time after time we see that the faithful men of old understood perfectly that their salvation was by God removing their sins and forgetting them permanently, and that this is a result of our recognition of our low place before the greatness of God the creator. Although this concept is not called grace until the New Testament, it is clear that the faithful of the Old Testament understood this was the way of their salvation. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
79:10 The Psalmists cry to God appeals to His desire that men would recognise Him as supreme – hence ‘where is their God?’ being the cry of His enemies would stir Him into action that he might be acknowledged.
80:8 When speaking of bringing ‘a vine out of Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psa 80:3,7,19 a link to the priestly blessing Num 6:24-26
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
|
Yahweh took His vine (people) out of Egypt and transplanted it in the promised land. In this vineyard they flourished, from the Mediterranean Sea to the river Euphrates (80:8-11). Then the vineyard was invaded and the fruit picked (80:12). The Assyrians spoiled Israel. This punishment was a result of sin. Contrast this account in Ps. 80 with the Lord's parable of the vineyard in Matt 21:33-41 which portends the destruction of the temple, the massacre of over one million Jews, and the scattering of the rest in 70 AD. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
80:13 The wild beasts devouring the land echoes Lev 26:22 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
79:2 The language of this verse shows that the punishments that came upon Israel were in fulfilment of Bible prophecy because Deut 28:26 provides the basis for this language. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
80:15,17 The ‘branch’ who s the ‘son of man’ that God made strong for Himself is Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
80:12 In speaking of the breaking down of the hedge – or Israel – the Psalmist is speaking about the same thing that Isaiah spoke of lager – Isa 5:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.24
- This cannot surely refer to 'human' desires, as they are part of the thinking
of the flesh, so the interpretation of this verse has got to be subject to scrutiny
by the rest of scripture. Surely before we ask, our desires must be from the right
motives. And one of our motives is that whatever we do should not stand in the
way of the progress of God's purpose - 'nevertheless thy will be done'. And yet,
having said this, here (and elsewhere) we have a verse that tells us that if we
believe in what we request and do not doubt (is this possible?) we can have our
request. Here there is further evidence to that statement that Bro. Peter Forbes
made last month - it MUST be possible to influence God's actions in prayer.
Matt.7:7-11, 18:19, 21:22, John 15:7, Jas.1:5,6, 5:15-18, 1John 3:22, 5:14,15. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
v.9
Whilst the people cry 'blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord' the
leaders oppose them asking Jesus to restrain them. However one of the last things
that Jesus says to the leaders is that the time will come when they will use
the same words. Matthew
21:9 23:39 Mark 11:9 Luke 13:35 Looking again at the last week of Jesus' life I thought that this table of days in Mark might be of interest Using the gospel of Mark as a basis it is possible, with relative certainty, to slot the other gospel records into this framework and thereby establish clearly what happened on each of the days of the week that culminated in the crucifixion of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :21
When Peter draws Jesus' attention to the withered fig tree which had been cursed
the previous morning Peter says 'behold the fig tree'. This conversation must
have taken place somewhere between Bethany and Jerusalem - probably on the mount
of Olives which is close by Bethany on the route that they would take to go into
the city.
In the Olivet prophecy, which was spoken on the mount of Olives [Mark 13:3]. During that discourse Jesus also says 'behold the fig tree' [Luke 21:29]. Is Jesus actually pointing to the very fig tree he cursed a couple of days ago when he says this? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :1-11
Jesus left Bethany to go to Jerusalem - a short journey of a few miles. The entry
into Jerusalem would not have taken very long. However apart from looking round
the temple the record tells us nothing else about what the lord did that day.
So it is clear that the record does not record all that took place that day. Thus
we should conclude that the details of what are recorded are of great significance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Mark
11 - The events of this chapter took place on the 10th and the 11th of Abib
- just days before our Lord was crucified.
Mark
11:4 - "Where two ways met" - This is the story of our
lives. We constantly find ourselves at the point where two ways meet and a decision
must be made as to which way we will go.
Mark
11:7 - "brought the colt to Jesus.... and He sat upon him" - Is
this telling us that Jesus was a small man? It would hardly be appropriate for
a 6'6'' well built man to try to ride such a young animal.
Mark
11:23 - "That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed"
- Is Jesus referring here to the Mt of Olives which will shortly be
re-arranged by the great Earthquake described in Zechariah
14:4? Is our faith developed to the extent that we know
that we will be with Jesus on that day?
___________________________________________________________
A
Golden Thread - God in His infinite wisdom, having removed Israel as
a living vine out of Egypt Psalm
80, gave Israel a focal point for their religious devotions in the
Tabernacle described in detail in Exodus
26. Both the vine and the Tabernacle pointed forward eloquently to the one
in Mark
11 who, though received as a King for a short time by the fickle crowd,
was first to undergo the ultimate sacrifice, that perfect Fruit might be brought
forth from Jew and Gentile through His death, and that the Israel of God might
spread forth to all nations in the future. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
|
We are now only 5 days before the death of Jesus so chapters 11-16 cover a period of about seven weeks - the previous chapters have covered just over three years. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Mark 11:7 The very fact that Jesus was riding into Jerusalem, not on a high spirited war steed or prancing white stallion but on a colt, the foal of an ass, an animal associated with the pursuits of peace, should have been sufficent to show that it was as the Prince of Peace that He had come. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.8 After the children of Israel left Marah (bitter) they came to Elim where there were twelve fountains of water and seventy palm trees (Exo 15:27). There is much symbolism here which should be evident. Palms were a symbol of righteousness (Psa 1:1-3, 92:12). They decorated Solomon's temple (2Chron 3:5) and figure prominently in Ezekiel's temple (Eze 40:16,22,26,31,34,37, 41:18,19,20,25,26). The righteous will display them before Christ in the future (Rev 7:9). Such is the symbol that was strewn before Jesus (John 12:13), the righteous branch (Isa 11:1). The fig tree represented Israel (v.13). The Lord hoped to find fruit on the tree but did not. Because the tree was unfruitful it was cursed (vs.14,20,21). And so was Israel. However, it was not the season for figs. The Lord's curse, therefore, seems harsh. However, there was an expectation for Israel, and for ourselves, to bear fruit at all times (2Tim 4:2). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| v.25 Time after time in scripture we are reminded that our forgivenss by God depends directly on our willingness and our efforts we make to forgive each other. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
11:13 Jesus was looking for 'the first ripe fruit' spoken of in Mic 7:1. Both Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.21 The fig tree had changed from a seemingly healthy tree, to a shrunken corpse, a shadow of what it was just the day before. Peter was not blaming Jesus for what had happened, he was unable to understand how it was possible for such a change to take place in so short a time. Hence we have Jesus' comment in the next verse; "Have faith" What a lesson for all to-day. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
| v 13 Apparently, at this time, when leaves appear on the fig tree in the spring, any tree that will bear fruit has some early immature figs on it. Obviously this tree must not have had any of these, and therefore would not have borne fruit that summer. ref to Israel Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
| Mark gives us a chronological account of Jesus riding into Jerusalem (Mark 11:1-19). He received the adulation of the crowds, then went into the temple and looked around. He then went out to Bethany for the night. Next morning He cursed the fig tree (the symbol of Israel not bearing fruit), and then re-entered the temple, and cleansed it of the traders. The morning after that, on their return to Jerusalem, the disciples noted the withered fig tree, and Jesus drew lessons from it for them. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
||||||||||
Vs.15,16 This is Jesus' second cleansing of the temple. For the significance of the two temple cleansings, see my note on John 2,3 Oct. 11th. V.26 is not found in many manuscripts. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
11:2 Notice that the colt had never been ridden before. It had not been ‘broken’. The colt represented human nature which no man so far had been able to tame. Jesus’ riding the colt showed that he had tamed human nature. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 23 Our faith must develope to the point, that we know that we will be with Christ at this time. (Zech 14:4) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
11:9 Psa 118 was a Psalm sung by the Jews at Passover time. In the past they would sing it without their being a deliverer. Now the Passover lamb was entering Jerusalem – but neither the leaders nor the common people did not recognise it! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
11:17 In saying ‘my house .. for prayer’ and ‘ye ... of thieves’ Jesus draws together two passages – Isa 56:7, Jer 7:11 – both of which were spoken to Israel in Jerusalem just before times of great trials of the inhabitants of that city. Isaiah spoke to Hezekiah when the Assyrians came against the city. Jeremiah spoke at the time of the Babylonian invasion. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The people on the road had done their homework. Isaiah 9:9 speaks of Israel's king coming to Jesrusalem riding on a donkey. None of them missed this symbolic act. And naturally they assumed that the rest of the chapter would be fulfilled too; namely the removal of the Roman occupier.
But this shows how important it is to notice the detail of scripture and not twist it to our own biased outlook. The Jews failed to notice (or ignored) v10 "he shall speak peace to the nations". So when Jesus came to Jerusalem, and to the Temple which was "a house of prayer for all nations" he fulfilled the scripture by clearing a place in the temple courtyard for the Gentiles to worship. The rest would have to come later. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
11:24 Of course Jesus is not saying that God will give us whatever we want. The implication is that we will only ask for things which are ‘according to God’s will - 1John 5:14 - for that is how those whose sins have been forgiven should think. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||