February 18

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Exodus  29
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Exodus 29 online in the King James Version
Listen to Exodus 29 online in the New International Version

 

v.14 - There are several references to this sin offering which was to take place 'without the camp'. Each time it was a bullock mentioned and the blood was to be sprinkled on the altar. It was the blood that did the atoning work in the tabernacle, and then the sin offering was burnt away from the camp, to symbolise sin having been removed - exactly the work of Jesus. Lev.4:11,12,21, 8:17, 16:27, Heb13:11,12.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.31-32 - Provision is made here for the priests' food - Not from the results of what was burnt on the altar, but of special provision. To seethe is to boil, so this was not roast meat.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
These chapters, in describing the consecration of Aaron and his sons, find their historical counterpart in Leviticus 8-10. Exodus describes what was to be done whereas Leviticus describes what actually happened.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:10 In putting their hands on the bullock the sons of Aaron were associating themselves with the death of the animal. The action of putting on of hands in Scripture always has this association - even when it was used for the passing on of the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Exodus 29:9 “Consecrate Aaron and his sons” – The margin has, ‘fill the hand of’ Aaron and his sons. A priest in the service of the Father was to always have his hands full with the service of the Truth. As the people brought forth their tithe offerings, so the priests had opportunity to look after the poor and the needy as they too came to the Tabernacle. The abundance given by God to His people, reflected in the tithe offerings, was able to support the priesthood, who having no inheritance in the land, were not able to grow their own crops or herds.

 

Exodus 29:45 – “And I will dwell among the children of Israel” – Why would God want to dwell among this people? They were an uncouth lot, always murmuring and complaining, wishing that they had stayed in Egypt. Why would God want to dwell among them? Answer – He called them out of Egypt to be His Family on earth. He was their Father. And as a Father He wants to dwell with His children, to experience their growth, watch their “first steps,” hear their “first words,” attend to their education and schooling, provide for their needs. Without saying so in so many words, God is telling Israel that He wants to move in with them, just as any parent likes to be in touch with their children and to experience the joys that raising a family can bring – 2 Corinthians 6:17.


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff
29:24 Throughout this chapter Moses has been doing the work. Notice the repeated use of ‘thou shalt take’ – however the matter in hand was the consecration of Aaron and His sons. So they had to be involved as well – hence the bread was to be put in their hands. So even though the work was done by the man of God’s appointment the men had to be involved. In like manner, we cannot consecrate ourselves. Our consecration is through the work of Jesus. However we have to be involved in our consecration – in the way that we live.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Yesterday’s "thought" of consecrating all gifts, is extended in today’s chapter to making human priests acceptable to God.  Seven days of consecration had to be observed for Aaron and for his sons. The point is obvious, that however "special" Moses’ brother might have appeared, he still could not approach to God without being consecrated for seven days Exo 29:35


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
Exo 29:38   "day by day continually" Once again we read of one of the daily duties. Not unlike providing the olive oil for the lamp. (Exo 27:7) Also maintaining the fire upon the alter. (Lev 6:12-13) We too have many daily duties if we are to maintain and develope spiritually.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
Blood was used to consecrate Aaron and his sons to the priesthood (v.20).  As well as sprinkling the altar, blood was placed upon the right ear, thumb, and large toe.  Literally, Aaron and his sons were consecrated from head to toe.
 
More specifically, the ear symbolized:
- Dedication to lifelong service.  Recall the bonding of the servant (Aaron) to his master (Yahweh) in lifelong service (Exo 21:6).
- Obedience of the people to Yahweh (via Aaron) (Jer 11:8).
- Mercy of Yahweh (Isa 59:1).
 
The thumb is the major component of the hand. To render it useless was to render the hand useless (Judg 1:7).
The hand is the greatest functional tool of the body.
The hand then symbolized:
- Divine power and authority (1Chron 29:12, Isa 64:8)
- Submission to Yahweh (2Chron 30:8 - note the phrase  yield yourselves literally means open your hand to).
 
As the thumb is to the hand, so is the large toe to the foot.
The foot was used for walking. 
The foot thus symbolized:
- Continual service to Yahweh (walk) throughout life's journey (wherever and whenever) (Gen 17:1, Lev 18:3,4).
- Victory (stamping out) over sin (Josh 10:24).
- Divine Grace (Isa 52:7).
 
It is significant that the ear, thumb, and large toe were on the right also.
The right position symbolizes:
- Divine power (Exo 15:6)
- Divine authority (Lev 7:32,33)
- Divine Grace and acceptance (Psa 110:1).
 
The above qualities were wrapped up in Aaron and the priest's office and all foreshadowed the Lord Jesus, our High Priest.

Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
v.1 - It is clear from the NT teaching that we are no longer under the law. However, it is equally clear that we have lessons to learn from reading it - let us be sure that our offerings which we bring on our spiritual level are without blemish, and let us give glory to Him that made them so.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

29:7     Moses anointed Aaron – but was not anointed himself! Moses was called of God, Aaron’s office was by descent. Moses was the basis for ‘that prophet’ – Messiah.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
V.43 The tabernacle was the appointed place where God would meet with the Children of Israel. The erection of the tabernacle showed God's willingness to be approached by man seeking mercy, but not at the sacrifice of His holiness, or His authority, or His majesty. This would be done once a year, and that would be by shed blood, and presented by a man of His choice. We have a High Priest through whom we can approach God at any time.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

It is interesting to notice the order of events in this chapter for the priests to be consecrated:  firstly they must be washed v4, secondly they must be clothed v5-6, then a series of sacrifices are to be made confirming them in service to the LORD. After this they are to share a meal v31,32 with the 'ram' that sealed their service to God. This sequence of events is very similar to how a disciple enters a relationship with God. Firstly the physical act of baptism is essential followed by the spiritual 'putting on the whole armour of God' Eph 6:11 and 'walking in love' Eph 5:2 as Christ did as a sacrifice to God. Following our calling we are commissioned to partake of the Lords feast Luke 22:19. In these events we are totally dependant on Christ, just as Moses was needed to perform the acts on his brethren. The many aspects of the law are extremely relevant today we should not neglect it, as we are to be priests with him in that day.


Tim Collard [Hall Green, Birmingham, UK]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Tim

29:42The continual burnt offering was to teach that service to God was not to be spasmodic or intermittent. Each day the offering was to be made. In like manner we wake to each new day to service to our God. Not simply in going to the meeting or ding the readings but in total commitment to doing His will.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
During the consecration we are told that they must take one bullock and two rams. The bullock, we see was used as a sin offering (10-14), then we have the first ram which is a burnt offering (15-18). The sin offering was made first, because until guilt had been removed no acceptable service could be performed. Finally we have the second ram offered as a peace offering "the ram of consecration"(19-22)
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

29:45    That God would ‘dwell among’ Israel is a foretaste of His involvement in the ecclesia – see 2Cor 6:16


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

The order of sacrifices is:

Sin offering

Burnt offering

Peace Offering

The sin offering must be given first, for, without the forgiveness of sins, nothing else matters.   And so it is for Christians.  Forgiveness of sins must first be obtained before salvation can be contemplated.  The prescribed way is belief in the Gospel (The Kingdom of God and the Name of Jesus Christ  (Acts 8:12)), and baptism (Mark 16:16). Any of the following: erroneous beliefs; lack of baptism; reliance on good works alone, would make salvation unobtainable.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

29:20 The ear signifies hearing, the thumbs is the most important digit on the hand for without the thumb much of the use of the hand is lost. The thumb represents working with the hand. The great toe signifies walking for if the foot has no toes balance is disrupted. Thus the putting of blood upon these extremities signifies that the priest is consecrated for the work of God.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.6 The crown was a chaplet, a wreath-like adornment that circled the head, placed over Aaron’s turban.

The word crown is translated from nezer which means something set apart; consecrated (to the service of Yahweh). The root word of nezer is nazar from which comes Nazerite, a person separated and wholly dedicated to the service of Yahweh (e.g. Samuel; Samson; John the Baptist; Jesus).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

29:37 Notice whatsoever touches the altar is holy. This is what is behind Jesus’ comment – Matt 24:19– where he speaks of the gift being sanctified by the altar


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

One of the reasons the 5 books of Moses seem so long is that there is repetition. First God tells Moses how to carry out His wishes, then later the actual event is recorded. So in actual fact there's less law than we might think.

In this particular chapter, Moses is still on Sinai (see 24:15-18, 25:1) receiving God's instructions. So by the time of the golden calf incident (chapter 32), Aaron wasn't a priest yet. This happened later in Lev 8 & 9. So what do you think Aaron thought about while waiting 7 days outside the tent?


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob
Reading 2 - Psalms 85 and 86
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Psalm 85 online in the King James Version Listen to Psalm 86 online in the King James Version
Listen to Psalm 85 online in the New International Version Listen to Psalm 86 online in the New International Version

 

85 v.2 - it is very important that we keep these things in our minds at all times - especially when our lives are not going well - whatever else happens, God has forgiven our sins - and we must believe that. A number of examples from people who did believe that are recorded for us. Ps.32:1, 79:8,9, Jer.50:30, Mic.7:18, Acts 13:39, Col.2:13.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
85:11 - The context of v.8-13 is that of salvation, and salvation is brought about by the marrying together of the mercy of God with the truth that springs out of the earth. It is a perfect way to describe Jesus, who sprang from earthy beginnings - being the son of a woman and therefore an inheriter along with all those who sprang from the earth, of sinful flesh. But in his work Jesus brings together this nature with the mercy and perfection of God, so becoming for us the way, the truth and the life. The word truth provides a fascinating and relatively simple study as there is essentially just one hebrew word and one greek word, which seem to be equivalent. Also note that by far the majority of occurrences of this word in scripture are to be found in the Psalms and the writings of John.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Psalm 85 - That there are a number of Psalms for 'the sons of Korah' of itself is a wonderful testimony to them. Korah died before the Lord for his rebellion as outlined in Numbers 16. His sons forsook him and his tents and consequently were blessed for their faithfulness. They did not love 'father' more than God.

Psalm 86 - In this Psalm David cries to God that He might hear him - :1, 2, 3, 6, 7,16, 17. But it not simply a call for God to answer him. Rather David is concerned that God will 'teach' him His ways [v11]. It is so easy for us to just pray for what we want with no regard to trying to understand God's desire. We must realise that if we ask 'according to His will' [1 John 5:14] He will hear us.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

85:2-3 Notice the progression
forgive
covered
taken away

86 - Even though David is willing to call on God (:1-7) he is not above asking God to 'teach' him (:11) We should be like this. Realising that we have to call on God but not being so arrogant as to think that we do not need God's instruction when we are in trouble. As if we think we can sort things out ourselves.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Psalm 85 – begins “A Psalm for the sons of Korah.”

 

Psalm 85:10“righteousness and peace have kissed each other” – It is not usual for those who are ‘incompatible’ to spend time kissing. Truly God’s righteousness and His attendant peace are greatly compatible. The peace that the world seeks is not based on God’s righteousness, therefore mankind will wear himself out trying to devise ways to create compatibility – but to no avail. Only when God’s righteousness is in the earth will this world enjoy the Peace that the prince of Peace will then share.

 

Psalm 86:11“unite my heart to fear thy name” -  Make my heart one, is the plea of David in this Psalm. How often do we find that we too, possess a double heart? Because of our nature, we tend to be so duplicitous. But David’s prayer should be our prayer too – create within me, O God, ONE heart, for you are ONE, your purpose is ONE, your spirit is ONE, everything about you is united and focused – ARE WE?


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

85:10 The way that ‘mercy and truth’ ‘kissed’ shows that there is no conflict between mercy and truth. Truth must be the touchstone in any Ecclesial matter. Once the truth has been established then the ‘mercy’ of God can be shown correctly.

86 - Whilst  David calls on God it is not from the position of strength notice
:1  ‘I am poor and needy’
:2 ‘thou hast forgiven’
:2 ‘thou hast covered …’
:3 ‘thou hast taken away’
Whilst we have bold access to the father (Heb 4:16) it is still in a position of need.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Psalm 85  This Psalm is one of thanksgiving after the return from the exile in Babylon.It would have been written possibly during the time of the rebuilding of the temple, under the leadership of Haggai and Zechariah.

Psalm 86  A Psalm of David showing his personal faith in God's present and future blessings.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

The application of the ear, as we saw in Exodus 29 (see my note) is evident in these two psalms. 85:8 demonstrates  willingness to listen (incline the ear) to Yahweh's instruction. 86:1,6 makes the appeal to Yahweh to incline His ear (be merciful).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
In Psa 85:10 it says that mercy and truth have met. I wonder if "Mercy" comes from Heaven, and "Truth" is on earth.  If that is so, then God's compassion from above, has combined with the truth on earth.  It's a vision of the Kingdom.  If that idea is true, then the remainder of the verse also implies that "Righteousness" has come from above, and has combined with the "Peace" on earth. Actually, the following verse (Psa 85:11) confirms this idea of things from above joining with things from below. "Truth" springs from the earth, while "Righteousness" looks down from Heaven.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David
86:5 - I was surprised to find that a search for forgive/forgiveness in the same verse as mercy yields but 2 results.  This one and also Num 14:19.  One wonders if the Psalmist is in fact drawng on the language of Numbers here.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

85:11    Truth and righteousness appearing in the earth are ideas which are presented together in Isa 45:8.

 

86:17    We might think that the request that God would show David ‘a token’ is the behaviour of a man who lacked faith. However God specifically gave Abraham a token with the covenant of circumcision – Gen 17:11. When He told Moses that he would be with him when he went to Egypt God gave ‘a token’ – Exo 3:12.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

86:12-17 - Perhaps this has a Messianic application: v12 Jesus glorified the name of his Father forever and this was the dominant theme in his ministry; v13 Christ was delivered from not only death but all the misery of the crucifixion; v14 violating the Sabbath, the Sanhedrin were "enlightened" rejectors of God's Law and Jesus, and demanded the violent crucifixion; v15 without the sacrifice of Jesus there would be no ultimate true mercy for mankind; v16 Jesus, who was strengthened in Gethsemane (Luke 22:42-43) was clearly the son of the Lord's only true handmaid, Mary (Luke 1:38,48); v17 the token or sign for good was the radiant Glory or countenance in the face of Jesus causing those who came to arrest him to stumble back and fall (John 18:6; Psa 27:1-2; 42:11).

Much of the above was gleaned from Psalms Studies Vol.2 by George Booker


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

86:11 The Psalmist asks God to teach him God’s way. It is a good think to ask God for instruction. However we do well to reflect on how He teaches. His instruction is there for us to read in His word, as it was for the Psalmist. The instruction comes from the Scriptures. They are able to make wise unto salvation – 2Tim 3:16 - So we should be praying that our eyes be opened to see things in the word – Psa 119:18


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

86:7 Notice the Psalmist cries to God when in trouble – it is so easy to blame God for our problems rather than see in Him their solution.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

Ps. 85 might be referring to the time after the Babylonian exile.  The captivity of v.1 could be speaking of this, although  restoration of Israel's fortunes could be applied to other times also.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

85:8 speaking peace is one of the characteristics of Jesus – Zech 9:10 – showing that this Psalm is messianic.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

85:8 In the KJV, the word saints is translated from the Hebrew word chasid which means pious, godly. In fact, chasid is translated godly (KJV) in Psa 4:3. Today, the Chasidim (pl. of Chasid) are very religious Jews who live and worship apart from other Jews (sometimes their name is spelled Hasid, but the H should be pronounced Ch, as in the Scottish lake, loch). The men can be easily spotted as they wear black coats and sport large hats. Sometimes their hats are ringed with a fur caplet to signify separateness (see my note on Exodus 29). Chasidic women are very moderately dressed with long skirts and head coverings.

86:2 The KJV has translated chasid as holy.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

85:12 The land providing her increase is a picture of the kingdom when the earth will bring forth bountiful crops – Psa 72:16


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Mark  14
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Mark 14 online in the King James Version
Listen to Mark 14 online in the New International Version

 

v. 37-40 - The disciples could not be there for Jesus in his greatest hour of need, but Jesus, rather than be angry about this, turns it round as ever, to reflect his constant care for his disciples, as he has for us. He warns them not to fall from their position of alert watchfulness, and the reason - that they are not overtaken by temptation. He needed their minds focused on the events around them - the current signs of the times. And we must heed this warning too. Matt.25:5, 1Thess.5:6-8, and at times when it is difficult - Heb.12:3.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.3 Simon was the father of Mary and Martha Lazarus and Judas Iscariot. Judas is called 'Simon's son' John 12:4 13:2 Mary and Martha were serving the meal because it was their father's house. Lazarus was Mary and Martha's brother as was Judas Iscariot. John 11:19
v.18 Jesus first taught his disciples that he would be betrayed at the time of the transfiguration. Matthew 17:22 He then speaks of it around the time of his death in the last week of his life and in the upper room. Matthew 20:18 26:2,21,23,45,46 Mark 14:41,42 Luke 22:21 John 13:21
v.31 Notice that it was not only Peter who had said that he was willing to lay down his life for Jesus.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
:37 Jesus seems distressed that the disciples were not able to stay away whilst he was praying - even though they had no idea what he was praying about or what was going to happen next. David 'looked for comforters and found none' [Psalm 69:20] and was distressed by this also. Have we thought about how we can support our brethren and sisters in their tribulation even if we do not fully understand their dilemma? It would seem that the simple presence of the disciples - or in David's case his friends - would have provided some form of sustenance.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
"I WILL NEVER DISOWN YOU"

"But Peter insisted emphatically, 'Even if I have to die with you, I will never disown you.'"

But we know that eventually the words of Jesus, when he prophesied that Peter would disown him three times, came true, and Peter did the very thing he had promised not to do.

When Jesus was confronted by the soldiers and all the people in the garden, Peter came to the fore. He was the one that was going to defend Jesus to the bitter end. No way would he deny his Lord! It was Peter whose sword came out to fight for Christ, and Peter who had to be told to calm down. When the pressure was on Peter was Hot!

However, later, in a non threatening environment, Peter had lost his edge. Asked by a servant girl - not a soldier with a sword - Peter tried to save face and disowned his Lord. He did it three times when the pressure was off.

If we have the same resolve as Peter, that we will never disown Christ, let us remember to confess him in every small occasion as well as in the big challenges. Let us not back down to save face, but stand by our man at all times.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
This chapter, whilst dealing with issues of one day has as it's prime focus the meal in the upper room. The mention of Judas (:10-11) is setting the scene for the events that will follow the meal and provides an explanation as to why Jesus kept the location of the place of the 'last supper' secret.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

Mark 14:3“And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the Leper” – Here Jesus is once more among friends. Judas’ father is named as Simon, and Judas was the only disciple of the twelve to domicile in or around Jerusalem. All the other disciples were Galilean. Is it possible that Mary, Martha and Lazarus were Judas Iscariot’s siblings? Judas certainly felt as though he could speak freely in regard to Mary pouring out the ointment at this time. Was Judas watching a family treasure being used on the Lord, as Mary poured out her love for Him? Judas certainly knew how much that vase of ointment was worth – more than 300 pence!! Now at a penny a day for the common wage, that would be equivalent to 1.5 years wages in our terminology. In Australia, 300 pence today would be worth about $50,000Aus. To make the conversion, it would be about $29,500 American or £16,300 English pounds.

 

Mark 14:5“For it might have been sold for more than 300 pence, and have been given to the poor” – The companion records state that Judas is leading the discussion. He was the “poor” that he had in mind. His companion disciples had no idea that he had his hand in the bag and was purchasing a retirement home for himself with the proceeds. But Jesus knew. And yet He continued to trust Judas with the common bag, AND He did not tattle on Judas to the other disciples. Indignant as Judas is here about the 300 pence, ultimately he betrayed the Lord (for He was never ‘his Lord’ to Judas) for just 30 pieces of silver – the price of a Jewish slave on the open market. Or was 30 pieces of silver a down payment, a deposit, for a greater sum of money to be handed over when the deed was fully done?

Mark 14:44“Whomsoever I shall kiss” – How wonderfully the readings tie together. We have just read in our Psalms reading, that there must needs be compatibility before a genuine kiss is exchanged. How hypocritical of Judas to kiss Jesus – he and Jesus are incompatible – yet our Lord graciously allowed Judas to take his part in this dastardly deed, that the thoughts of his heart might be made fully manifest to his fellows who had worked and walked with him for 3.5 years.  Notice Judas, in kissing the Lord, addresses Him as “Master, Master?”  Never does Judas ever address Jesus as Lord – Luke 6:46.


Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Cliff

14:1 Now the public preaching of Jesus is over. He had spoken to the leaders Matt 23:39 telling them that they would not see him again -until Psa 118:26 is fulfilled. From this time on Jesus focuses on the needs of the disciples.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Mark 14:51-52  "A certain young man" Who was this young man?  We are not told who it was, but with Mark the only gospel writer to record this event. It makes us think that it was Mark. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

How would the disciples know which man to follow? (v.13).
The custom was that women were the ones who bore the pitchers of water, and so a man doing it would stand out.
 
V.24 says that the sacrifice of Jesus was for many not all. This dispels the notion that He was a substitutive sacrifice for all men and women.
 
The Lord's enemies had nothing with which to convict Him. If He  had continued to hold His peace (v.61), He could not have been condemned.  But He knew that scriptures had to be fulfilled, and so he gave His enemies an opening in v.62.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

V.17 Before the betrayal of Judas, Jesus had some precious hours with the disciples, it was of utmost importance that they should not be disturbed, so once again we see his love to those who followed him. As he prepared them secretly for the events of the next few hours. The same love is available to each one of us to day. Love to the uttermost.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John
v.1  - It is only recently I have come to realise why the Chief Priests and the Scribes were so keen to kill Jesus.  I used to think it was an act of dreadful jealousy, but in fact it is because death was the punishment under the law for those who disobeyed, and in their eyes, Jesus had openly and unashamedly disobeyed their rules - their sacred law - and so was worthy only of death. Death (by stoning) was the punishment for working on the Sabbath, for example. Although this thinking is wrong, it makes much more sense than these men being jealous of his following.  Maybe everyone reading this comment realised this years ago, but there you go!
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Peter

14:7      in saying 'you have the poor with you always' Jesus is not expressing a selfish sentiment. Rather he is stating a Divine truth for he is quoting Deut 15:11. Wickedness and poverty go hand in hand. Not that poor people are wicked. Rather the behaviour of mankind generates poverty in some through the greed of others.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
v 5 we have to be careful about assessing what we do for others in purely selfish material terms. We remember that all that we have, whether material possessions or abilities, come from God, and the attitude of giving, without assessment of loss or gain to ourselves, is what we need to have.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Wendy
May I put forward an idea about leavened or unleavened bread used for the Last Supper?  This is only a suggestion. From Mark 14:12 it looks as though the “First day of unleavened bread” had already come, so therefore the bread in Mark 14:22 would have been unleavened.  But I don’t think this is quite correct.  Look in Lev 23:5-14. The 14th of the first month is the Passover. The next day the feast of unleavened bread starts, and lasts for a week. In Lev 23:10 the firstfruits were offered. IF … the Passover was killed and eaten on the Thursday, the Unleavened Bread feast started on the Friday, the normal Sabbath would be on the Saturday, then the firstfruits were offered on the Sunday (on the morrow after the Sabbath – Lev23:11). If this is right isn’t it wonderful that Christ rose very early on the Sunday, just at the time when the farmers were taking their firstfruits to God. 1Cor 15:23 takes on a much greater significance.
To complete the suggestion started from our Mark reading, Mark 14:12 must mean the whole of the Passover/Unleavened Bread week, and strictly under the Mosaic Law the Passover night came first, then the Unleavened Bread started on the next day. So the bread used by Jesus would have still be leavened.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

 

After Jesus' perceived blasphemous confession (v.62), Caiaphas, the high priest, self-righteously tore his clothes (v.63).  In doing this, he acted contrary to the Law (Lev 21:10).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Michael

14:2 That the leaders did not want to take Jesus ‘on the feast day’ indicates that they had been planning to take Jesus for some time. They are now getting anxious because they have not managed to take him and the feast is only two days away. When Judas went to see them that night they must have heaved a great sigh of relief. Of course the timing was not in their hands it was in the hand of the Father. It is Christ who is our Passover - 1Cor 5:7- that the Father had in His mind from ‘the foundation of the world’ Rev 13:8.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
DOERS OR COMPLAINERS?
 
Two parts were played out at Bethany. At the meal table where Jesus was having dinner the first person played their part. "A woman came with an alabaster jar of very expensive perfume, made of pure nard. She broke the jar and poured the perfume on his head." (Mark 14:3) This perfume was worth a years wages.
 
On the part of this woman it was a very wonderful and self sacrificing thing she did. It was the best she had and she gave it all to her Lord. It wasn't even as if she opened the jar of perfume and poured it out, keeping some back for herself. She broke the jar and the perfume was poured on Jesus' head. The jar was now useless to use again.
 
The second part was played by others who were present. They said, "'Why this waste of perfume? It could have been sold for more than a years wages and the money given to the poor.' And they rebuked her harshly." (v.4-5) These people were not the ones who had given the gift. They had not given gifts to the Lord of Life and yet they felt it appropriate to criticise the giver of this beautiful gift.
 
Which part do we play? Are we doers or complainers? Would we have been the one giving or the one complaining? Let's be sure that the sharpness of our tongues does not catch out the laziness of our hands. Let's be the movers and shakers - not those who sit down and criticise.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert

14:3  Mark along with Matt 26:7 speak of Mary anointing Jesus’ head. However John says it was his ‘feet’ - John 12:12 – there is no discrepancy. John focuses upon the feet because he then goes on to talk about Jesus washing the disciples ‘feet’ – John 13:5.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

14:10 That Judas went to the chief priests means that he walked from Bethany into Jerusalem which is quite a walk, down into the Kidron valley and up the steep slope into the city and then to the palace of the high priest.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

The ruling council of the Jews (the Sanhedrin) was made up seventy-one of the richest, most powerful elite of society. They were mainly Sadducees, although some prominent Pharisees were among them.  Under the direction of the high priest, they unanimously condemned Jesus to death (v.64), although they were not allowed to execute anyone (John 18:31).  Joseph of Arimathea (Mark 15:43) and Nicodemus (John 3:1) were members of the Sanhedrin.  However, they must have proclaimed their faith in Jesus before this event otherwise they would have been counted in the unanimous decision of the council.  They would have given up great wealth and power to follow their master, and would have certainly been shunned, and probably persecuted by the council.  Their faith is recorded as they cared for the body of the Lord (John 19:38-40).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

Peter's conversion

In Mark 14 we have Peter's worst hour, and yet the best. Even though he had confessed Jesus as the Christ (8:29) he was not yet willing to accept him as such, because his own pride (dependence on self) wouldn't allow it. Nevertheless it was his betrayal that brought about his conversion as Jesus had prophesied beforehand in Luke 22:24-34. Notice how this passage is in the context of their argument about who would be the greatest. And the washing of the feet. The woman in v3-9 was the only one recorded for us in scripture who accepted him as her saviour before he died. Her act was one of submission, copied by Jesus in the washing of his disciples feet. He wanted them to be like her.

So in v27 we see why Jesus quoted Zechariah. He had prophesied they would need to be refined in the fire, as silver and gold is, before they truly submitted to the Lord (Zech 13:7-9).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

14:26The singing of a hymn at this point is the same time as John 14:31when Jesus said ‘arise let us go hence’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter