|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 7
v.1
- I was surprised to discover that the word for god here is elohim ('elohiym
0430) and on no less than 243 other occasions it is translated god,
with a small g (as well as 2346 with a capital G). It means
a ruler or judge usually claiming some degree of 'supernatural' quality. This
was true of Moses in the eyes of Pharaoh because of the signs God had shown him
at Moses' hand. Not only is Moses described as elohim in this verse but also Aaron
as nabiy'
(05030) which is the normal word for prophet, or for false prophet. I don't
know whether this surprises you as much as it does me - that the same word is
used for god as God and for false prophet as prophet? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 8:19
the magicians assert that Moses' miracles are done by 'the finger of God'. Jesus,
when being accused of casting out devils by Beelzebub asserts that he is casting
out devils by the finger of God saying 'But if I with the finger of God cast
out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you'. Luke
11:20 to assert that
the magicians in Egypt were more perceptive than those who were questioning his
authority in performing miracles. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 8
v.5 - It seems that at this point it was Aaron's rod that was used to invoke
the power of God, although God still spoke, apparently, only to Moses. One wonders
why this was - was it that Aaron's faith was greater, and Moses still had this
lesson to learn. By the time they escape and reach the Red Sea it is Moses' rod
(or at least his hand) that is used to part it (ch.14:21).
Does this represent a development in Moses' faith or simply in his confidence
in public? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Chapter 7 :20 were turned to blood Revelation 16:3 :21 and the fish died Revelation 16:3 The two uses of language from Exodus 7 in Revelation 16 shows that the second woe produces judgements like the judgements on Egypt before the exodus. 8:19 In saying that the bringing forth of the lice was 'the finger of God' the Egyptian magicians acknowledged that it was beyond their power to produce such events. When Jesus [Matthew 12:28] says 'if I by the finger of God ' he is reminding the leaders of his days that even the Egyptian magicians recognised the hand of God at work - by implication they should have recognised it also. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:13 The hardening of Pharaoh's heart is something to consider throughout the plagues. He started by hardening his own heart (see RV) but eventually God hardened his heart. He ended up being confirmed in his wickedness. We should beware lest God '(gives) us up' Psalm 81:12. 8:23 Part way thought the plagues God 'put a division between' Israel and the Egyptians. So we should ask 'Why did God bring some of the plagues upon His own people?' The answer is that Israel were rebellious in the land of Egypt and had refused to listen to one of God's prophets - probably Moses - and so were being punished (Ezekiel 20:6-8) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Exodus 7:10 There is some evidence that this staff that was cast down before Pharoah, was actually turned into a Crocodile, rather than a snake. The Crocodile, of course, is very plentiful in the Nile and aptly symbolises the power of Egypt. Whether the rod became a serpent or a crocodile matters little, as the Bible uses both creatures as symbols of sin's power Gen 3:14-15, Job 41. Exodus 7:20 Egypt's Pharoah, by his decreees, had stained the river with the blood of the Hebrews' children, and now God made thei r river all blood. Normally, as the Nile rose in flood, and the waters changed in hue from dull blue-green to ochre red, the vitality of the river also rose. Now, as all the river turned blood red miraculously, the exact opposite effect was noted - the water could not be drunk and the fish died. No longer was Egypt's Nile "god" a source of life and delight. For seven long days, the Egyptian people were encouraged to reflect on the consequences of opposing Yahweh God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.Life is all about making choices.... and Pharoah chose to harden his heart, even though it would be obvious to all, that such a course of action was obviously not in his or the nations best interests. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
7:11 Apparently there are snakes which can be made rigid simply by squeezing their necks. Doubtless this is what the magicians in Egypt were doing. One wonders whether Pharaoh understood anything about the trickery of his magicians or whether he was completely taken in by them. If he realised that they were tricksters that may well explain why he was not that impressed by Moses’ miracles. 8:20 That Moses was to go and stand by the river Nile early in the morning and wait for Pharaoh gives an insight into the habits of the Egyptians. Both Pharaoh and his daughter bathed in the river. A little point but it gives an insight into Egyptian royal life at this time. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The first 8 plagues were forecast by God, so that Pharaoh would know that these terrors had been sent by the God of Israel. The 9th plague of darkness Exo 10:21-23 and the 10th when the firstborn were killed, were not however spelt out to the king. God had warned them enough. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| Exo 7:1 In some of the newer versions the translaters have added the word "like." Moses was like a god before Pharoah. Both the N.I.V. and the N.R.S.V. read I have made you like God before Pharoah. While the N.K.J.V. version reads I have made you as God to Pharoah. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
The Egyptians worshipped a great many gods. Some were in the form of animals.
These various gods ruled over:
Pharaoh, himself, was considered a god. In death, Pharaoh was worshipped as Osiris, king of the underworld.
The Egyptian duo of Isis and Osiris is the equivalent of the mother/wife-son relationship which came from Babylon.
There Semiramis, the first queen of Babylon was married to Ninus whose name means child. Ninus is identified with Nimrod the founder of Babylon. His name means we shall rebel.
Thus the worship of mother and child began. The tower of Babel was a monument reaching to heaven for the worship of Semiramis the queen of heaven. After the post-Babel scattering, people took this mother/child worship into all parts of the world.
Some biblical examples of this influence can be seen in:
(1) The abomination that Ezekiel saw as women near the temple wept for Tammuz (Eze 8:14). Tammuz = Osiris = Nimrod.
(2) Diana (Artemis) is an Asian form of Semiramis (Acts 19:35).
Today these influences can be seen in many diverse religions. Notably, this same form of mother/child worship can be seen in the Catholic and Orthodox churches expressed through the Madonna and Child.
Thus, the exercise of the plagues of Egypt was for Yahweh to show the Israelites His opposition to Pharaoh = Osiris = Nimrod who represented an idolatrous system of worship. Yahweh would bring his people out of the land of idolatry to worship Him solely (Exo 34:14). Egypt would be defeated (Isa 19:1).
We must be careful to oppose any form of idolatry (1Cor 10:14). For we know that the rebellion of the idolatrous, false system of worship, which began in Babylon and exercised in Egypt, will ultimately be defeated (Rev 19:20). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 7:1 Moses is here encouraged to wait again on Pharaoh, not however as formally, in the attitude of a humble suppliant, but now armed like a god " I have made you as God unto Pharaoh" (N.K.J.V.) to make his demand in a tone and manner which Pharaoh would have never before encountered. He was even provided with a spokesman in Aaron. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| It is belived that the Jannes and Jambres of 2Tim 3:8 are Egyptian magicians who challenged Moses. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 7:3 - The hardening of Pharaoh's heart was not to prolong the suffering, or to bring Egypt to repentance, as that was clearly not even on the cards - but to show forth the glory of God. See also 9:13-17, especially v.16 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Exo 7:10,11,12,17,18,19,25 - Aaron's wooden rod reminds me of how Christ was "wounded" by sin in that he was sacrificed on the cross but he achieved a victory over sin and not just for himself as he "ate" the sins of others with his resurrection. Christ was more powerful than the false gods of sin in Egypt that trick so many even to this day. Also, the water to blood reminds me of baptism and sacrifice. In the millenial era (7th day) there will be plenty of refreshing spiritual water throughout the land thanks to Christ's sacrifice and return. Exo 8:16-18 - Here the magicians couldn't even pretend to do what God through Moses did. Only God can make life out of the dust of the earth be it man or gnat. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
7:7 Just a little point but this verse demonstrates that Aaron was three years older than Moses. We should be alert to the incidental details we can pick up from the text which provide information which will be of general value.
8:7,18 That the magicians could apparently replicate the early miracles that Moses did provided Pharaoh with an opportunity to rationalise his rejection of Moses’ claims. However common sense should have told him that a ‘mere man’ would not be able to do what the magicians did – so he should have recognised a difference between the magicians and Moses. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| As we read the record of the plagues, we realize that our knowledge of God is based upon the evidence of those things that have been recorded for us. God interfered in the release of His people from Egypt, as a result it has been brought to our senses that He exists as a conscious and omnipotent Being, holding all creation in His hand. This knowledge is different than worldly knowledge which is based on theory John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
It would seem to me that Moses' rod is used by Aaron for the performing of the signs - see 4:17. Altho Moses, as the one in charge, is said to be doing the miracles eg 7:15,17, it is actually Aaron, as his spokesman, who is doing them 7:19 Altho the magicians can ostensibly replicate the miracle, they are unable to undo it 8:8 There is no mention that the gnats are taken away, and perhaps the gnats & flies tormented the people together. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
|
The LORD did not exempt Israel from the discomfort of the first three plagues. The exemption only started at the fourth plague (8:22,23) and continued through the tenth (where exemption only occurred if the blood was properly applied around the door frame). Perhaps the LORD let His people experience the first three plagues in order for them to appreciate His power and keep them humble. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
7:2 When God tells Moses that he ‘shall speak all hat I command thee’ God is not only telling Moses that he will not have to work out for himself what he is t speak to Pharaoh. He is also describing the relationship with God that the prophet greater than Moses would have as described in Deut 18:18 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
8:1,9 Moses had said that he was not eloquent Exo 4:10 but God commanded Moses to speak and it was Moses who did speak. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:13 The hardening of Pharaoh’s heart becomes a motif in Scripture for rebellion. God uses it many times to speak of Israel. For example – 1Sam 6:6 - so whenever Israel were described as hard hearted they were being likened to rebellious Pharaoh, who against the evidence, refused to obey God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:1,2 Moses was a god, a representative of Yahweh who spoke in His Name. Aaron was the prophet, the one who conveyed the words of Yahweh as passed on through His representative Moses (Amos 3:7). 7:3 The multiplication of signs and wonders was essentially for the benefit of the Israelites and not the Egyptians (although some Egyptians did benefit by leaving Egypt with the Israelites (Exo 12:38). 8:7 The Egyptian magicians had no real power. They were clever in doing sleight of hand tricks using the principle that all magicians use, that the hand is quicker than the eye. They were able to produce a reasonable replication this way. But as Yahweh’s demonstration of power became more complex, the magicians could not conjure up any similarity (8:18). 8:8 The Egyptian god Ptha had the head of a frog. But the invasion of real frogs was just too much for Pharaoh. By using the symbol of one of their gods, Yahweh displayed His power consistent with His own wisdom (Prov 26:5). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Exo 7:4 Although Moses was told by God to ask Pharoah for the release of the Israelites from slavery we have a very clear message here that our help does not come from man (Psa 146:3-5). By contrast, from Exo 8:13, we see that God does hear us when we ask according to His will (1John 5:14) Lindsay Yuile [Glasgow South Scotland (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Lindsay |
||||||||||
| Exo 8:27 - another mention of the 3 day journey associated with sacrifice - Christ would have a 3 day "journey" associated with his sacrifice too. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
7:18 The children of Israel had responded to Moses –5:21 – that they had been made to stink before Pharaoh. Now the land of Egypt was to ‘stink’. The evil that Pharaoh brought against Israel was to rebound upon his own head. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
61 v.4 - Here is our comfort. Whatever state we find ourselves in here in this life is of no consequence compared with what is laid up for ever. It is quite a theme in Psalms - 61:7, 23:6, 27:4, 90:1, 91:1. Let us too abide in that tabernacle for ever - not this one that we have now - 2Cor.5:1-5 - but the everlasting one - Rev.3:12. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 60
v.4 - Here we are being told to rest in Jesus. He is the banner which we wave,
and he is the truth in which we live. Isa.11:12 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Psalm
60 - This Psalm has it's historical background in 2 Samuel 8:3.
Psalm 61 - David feels able to cry to God for help :1 because he knows that God has heard him in the past :3. An example for us to follow. We must be aware of the ways in which God has been with us in the past else we will have no basis for confidence that He will help us in our present distresses. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| WISH LIST
In Psalm 37 David tells us to "Delight yourself in the LORD and he will give you the desires of your heart." (Psalm 37 v 4). What do we desire? What is it that we dream about, or wish we could do or have, of only we had the opportunity? If we were to be granted one wish, what would it be? Davids wish was one that would be worth modeling our own wishes on. He said, "I long to dwell in your tent for ever and take refuge in the shelter of your wings." (Psalm 61 v 4). David wanted to be in the kingdom of God when it was established in righteousness for ever. There are so many things that we desire good marks at school, a job, a car, a partner, a home, a family, health, success, and all the other little betterments that we desire for ourselves, but I think that Davids desire takes the cake. There is nothing better we could wish for than to be with God for ever. If this is on the top of our wish list we cannot go wrong, because all the other wishes will have their settlement when that time comes. So as we consider our wish list today, lets put Davids wish at the top. "I long to dwell in your tent for ever." Then lets strive towards it with all of our hearts to be sure that our desire will be granted. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
60:6 In saying that 'God hath spoken in His holiness' David is reflecting what he said (Psalm 89:35) in response to the promise of the son (2 Samuel 7) Psalm 61 - 'Neginoth' 05058 in the title means 'song' Job 30:9 And now am I their song 05058 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 60 This Psalm is said to have been composed when David "strove with Aramnaharaim and with Aram-zobah, when Joab returned and smote in the valley of salt twelve thousand." The allusion is to the transactions referred to in 2 Samuel 8 and 1 Chronicles 18. In those chapters we learn that David made extensive conquests in the East, extending his victories over Moab, Syria, and Hamath, and subduing the country as far as the Euphrates. It is to these victories that the Psalm refers, see Psa 60:7-8. The words rendered Aram-nahaim mean properly Aram (or Aramea) of the two rivers, and the reference is to Syria or Mesopotamia. The compound word occurs elsewhere in the following places, in all of which it is rendered Mesopotamia, Gen 24:10, Deut 23:4, Judg 3:8, 1Chron 19:6. The word Aram is of frequent occurrence, and properly refers to Syria. The name comprehended more than Syria proper, and the term Aram-naharaim, or Aram of the two rivers, was used to designate that part of the general country of Aramea which was between the Tigris and the Euphrates. The compound term Aram-zobah refers also to a part of Aramea or Syria. This kingdom was in the neighborhood of Damascus, and perhaps comprehended Hamath, and probably extended as far as the Euphrates. The king of this country is represented as making war with Saul 1Sam 14:47, and with David 2Sam 8:3, 2Sam 10:6. In 2Sam 8:3, David is represented as having smitten "Hadadezer, the son of Re hob, king of Zobah, as he went to recover his border at the river Euphrates." It is to these wars, and to this conquest, that the title of the Psalm alludes. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
60:7 In speaking of Judah as ‘my lawgiver; David is echoing the blessings of Jacob (Gen 49:10) 61:4 David’s one desire was to dwell in God’s house (Psa 27:4) and now, despite his problems, he still holds on to that hope. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 60 David prays for victory over the Edomites, who had invaded Southern Israel while David was in Syria. ( 2Sam 8:14 ) Psalm 61 This Psalm was probably written while David was in Mahanain, when he left Jerusalem at the rebellion of Absalom. (2Sam 17:24 ) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
60:4 The banner that is given to those who fear the Lord is Christ. Banner in Hebrew is nec and is the same word rendered pole in relation to the brazen serpent (Num 21:8,9). Those who look up and see Jesus on the cross (pole) slaying the enmity of sin (serpent) will be saved (Eph 2:16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
God has been a shelter for David. God has been a strong tower in which to hide from the enemy. David recalls, in this psalm 61, the episodes in his life where he was utterly overwhelmed (v2). These were the times where he despaired of life. He had no way out, no way to save himself, nothing he could do. They were times where he had tried everything, but still his enemies prevailed, looming over him and casting a shadow over his every waking hour. At these times of utter incapacity, David had turned to God. Through the utter beating down he received in his trials, he had been able to see that there was nowhere else to turn, but to God. In utter desperation, misery, and depression, he had given up his own hold on life, and given it over to his Father. His Father, yes, not only his God, because it was through this giving up of his own life, that he gained sonship. Read Hebrews 11 and 12 back to back one day, and see the wonderful progression in Paul's argument. A long list of people, who, having an awful lot going for them, gave it up, instead relinquishing control of their lives to God. Then the exhortation that this is exactly what Christ did too, overcoming by giving up (Heb 12:2), and gaining the sonship because of it. The progression onto ourselves, that if we give ourselves up to God in subjection to trials and chastening (v7, 9) we will gain sonship, and a spiritual abode in the heavens along with Christ (v22-23). It is this sonship, and the heavenly abode which goes with it, that David gained through his trials. Whenever he gave up to God, trusting in Him alone, he was dwelling in heavenly places. God was his shelter. God was his tower. God had invited David into his tent. God kept him warm and dry under His wings. God had given him the heritage of a son (v5). David would dwell with God in this life, and then forever (v7), because he had given up. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| Psa 60 - ON LOAN The people that lived in Moab, Edom and Philistia all believed they owned the land they lived on. Even though God said otherwise, I am sure there were many in Israel who also believed that the land they lived on was theirs. We also think the same. Many of us own our own houses and the land they sit on, and consider it as our property. But as we read this Psalm we find that God shifts the paradigm of ownership away from our traditional viewpoint. Here he says, "I will parcel out Shechem and measure off the valley of Succoth. Gilead is mine, and Manesah is mine; Ephraim is my helmet, Judah my scepter. Moab is my washbasin, upon Edom I toss my sandal; over Philistia I shout in triumph." (Psa 60:6-8) All these people were to discover that they were not in control but that the LORD owned both them, their possessions and their land, and could do what he liked with it. It is still the same for us. We may think that our lives, the things we have and the land we live on are ours, but in actual fact they are on loan to us by God to be given or taken at his pleasure. Our responsibility is to make sure we are good tenants for our God, using what we have been given to benefit he LORD our God. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| a) Psa 60:4 is a wonderful verse to encourage us to preach. The banner, or the truth from God, can and should be displayed high and readable. We must share with other people our love for God. b) Psa 61:2 asks God to lead David to the rock that is higher than himself. A rock which is shorter than the man won't shelter him very well, will it? God's protection is infinite. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
| 60:2 - It behoves us to recognise, all times, as David did, that it is God that performs all things. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
60:6-7 The language of these two verses is the language of inheritance. God is saying, like he did in Josh 1:6, that He is the one who determines which land is possessed by nations. The context of the Psalm is of
61:5 We might wonder what David’s ‘vows’ were. We do know that he vowed that he would not rest until he had found a place for the Lord – Psa 132:2 so maybe this Psalm was written after the time he had brought the ark to Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
60:4 - this banner or ensign seems to be a prophetic reference to Christ, the root of Jesse, in Isa 11:10,12. Victory over sin was made possible by Jesus who was lifted up on a cross Num 21:8-9; John 3:13; 12:32. Psa 60:7 - Judah is my septer (or lawgiver) also seems to be a prophetic reference to Christ who would be the septer from Judah Gen 49:10-11 who would come to fulfill the law and the prophets Matt 5:17. Psa 61:1-2 - lead me to the rock that is higher than I. Perhaps this is another Messianic prophecy with the son subject to the Father (1Cor 15:28); the son himself crying out on the cross needed salvation (Psa 22:1-2; Heb 2:14; 5:7-9). In seeking the salvation and will of his Father, Jesus built his house of faith upon the rock (Matt 7:24-27) and ultimately became the rock himself (1Cor 10:4; Isa 32:2). Could the longing to dwell in the tent forever and the shelter of your wings (cherubim?) in Psa 61:4 refer to the tabernacle tent of dwelling echoing the Kingdom of God with Christ's return? Much of the above is gleaned from Psalms Studies vol 1 by George Booker.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
The appeal is for deliverance by the LORD's right hand (60:5). The phrase right hand is a figurative recognition of the LORD's strength and ability (Exo 15:6). Most people are right-handed and that is where their strength and ability reside. The Latin word for right is dexter from which we derive dexterity meaning skilful. On the other hand (pardon the pun), the Latin for left is sinus which originally was a pocket worn on the left side of a garment. From sinus came the word sinister, originally meaning left but which came to mean evil or unlucky. No wonder left-handed people had a hard time historically. Ironically, though, there were some very skilful left-handed men from the tribe of Benjamin (Benjamin means son of my right hand) (Judg 20:16).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
61:6 In saying the king’s life would be ‘as many generations’ echoes the sentiments of David – 1Kin 2:4– when David understood that if his sons were faithful there would always be a son of David on the throne of Israel. This thought is also picked up by Solomon – 1Kin 8:25 – when he is dedicating the temple. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Psa 60 From the title of this Psalm we get the idea that the instructions are for parents to teach their children this Psalm. "Teach" is LAMAD (3825). Which indicates teaching or providing instruction. It appears that the Psalm is pointing out the hardships of David, his difficulties and distresses, then goes to the victories promised. The lesson for those memorizing the Psalm would be that help comes from God, not man. This is clearly pointed out in our reading from the Psalms for tomorrow (Psa 62) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
60:5 ‘in Hs holiness’ echoes Psa 89:35– a Psalm which expounds the promises which were made to David just prior to the events which prompted the writing of this Psalm. So David is anticipating God t respond in a particular manner because of the promises. Likewise we should expect God to respond in our lives according to our conviction in the promises that have been made to those who are His children. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
60:1 Whilst the historical record in 2Sam 8 abut this battle seems to be a very positive account one might conclude from this verse in the Psalm that things had previously gone badly for Israel against the Edomites. This might be seen in the title of the Psalm which says ‘Joab returned and smote ...’ This difference in emphasis may be because the historical narrative is concerned to show the way in which David amassed material for the temple whereas the Psalm shows a fuller picture of events. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
61:6 This is a reference to Jesus as king, that He might live many generations (KJV). The translation many generations is a poor one. The phrase comes from the Hebrew word dor which means generation. But, the word is used twice in succession, dor dor which literally means generation after generation. This implies for all generations, i.e. forever.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
60:3 ‘wine of astonishment <08653>’ is seen in a very similar way in Isa 51:1,22 as 'cup of trembling’ which are the only other places in Scripture where the Hebrew word <06853> is found. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
4,5
- Look at the sense in which this happens. It is a picture that Paul uses a lot,
but there is a great deal to be learnt by putting those instances together and
considering the spiritual outcome and altering our lives accordingly. 1Cor.10:17,
12:12-20,27-28 Eph.1:23, 4:25, 5:23,30 Col.1:24, 2:19. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.1
Up to this point the apostle, by the spirit, has been outlining doctrines and
their implications. In saying 'I beseech you therefore ...' he indicates that
what follows is a logical consequence of believing correct doctrine. Paul continues
in the letter to show how we can be a 'living sacrifice' [12:1]
A living sacrifice is a sacrifice in which we conquer the mind of the flesh and
manifest the mind of the spirit. v.3-8 Paul returns to the theme of unity emphasising that unity is to be achieved amongst brethren and sisters who are different from each other. We should not seek to make our brethren and sisters conform to our image of normality. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| TRANSFORM "Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind." (Romans 12 v 2) The miracle of a fat little caterpillar turning into a graceful and beautiful butterfly is an incredible transformation. Yet this is the scale of the transformation it takes to turn us from fat ugly sinners, into attractive servants of Christ, full of grace. We are told that we need to transform. Before we gave ourselves to Christ, we were conformed to the pattern of this world. That means we thought like the world, sinned like the world, did the things that the world does and had not turned toward God at all. Paul's letter follows with examples of areas that should be transformed in our lives: pride, service, love, enthusiasm, getting on with each other, revenge, submission, and judging one another, to name a few. Each of those areas needs a change in attitude, so that we start to think how Christ thought. That's what it means to renew our minds. It means to think differently, and in this context, to stop thinking like the world, and to think like Christ. The mission we have in this life is to transform our minds with the same dramatic change as that with which a caterpillar turns into a butterfly. At the resurrection God will transform our bodies. Let's make sure our minds are ready. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 12:14
'Bless them which persecute you' quotes Matthew
5:44 showing that the Sermon on the Mount has a real practical application
in Christian living. It is not just a list of nice theories. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Romans 12 In this chapter Paul expounds the real role of the Priesthood. Note the key words - "sacrifice, service, holy." v3 "will of God" - Peter tells us later in 2Pet 3:9 that it is not the will of God that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. And in 1Tim 2:3-4. Paul elaborates further when he revealed that our Heavenly Father would "have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth." v20 "heap coals of fire on his head" - this was not as painful as it sounds. In Israel, if your fire went right out, you could go to your neighbour and he might put some burning coals in a bucket, which bucket you then carried, on your head, back to your own dwelling. So to "heap coals of fire" upon the head of your enemy, was to furnish him graciously with the neccessary elements of life - ie. food, water and warmth cp Prov 25:22. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
| 12:16 In ‘condescending to men of low degree’ we are doing no more than our Father is willing to do (Psa 113:6). If the creator of the universe can do it why should we have problems? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Rom 12:4-5 Diversity without unity spells confusion. Unity without diversity means monotony. As it is the human body, so also in the ecclesia; both unity and diversity are needed. All have different personallities and make up, yet working together, we share a common belief and hope. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| v.12 - patience in scripture, I suggest, is a doing word, rather than a waiting word. We are, in our patience, expected to be proactive and show our love for God and our desire to be moulded and chastened by Him to reveal the peaceable fruit of righteousness (Heb 12:11) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| What Paul asks us to do is unnatural. It is natural to be selfish and judgemental. But, the man or woman of God must try to overcome natural tendencies. For the spiritually-minded person, there will always be a savage war going on (Gal 5:17). That is what makes the exhortation of Rom. 12 important and valuable. That is what makes our exhorting of one another equally important and valuable (Heb 3:13, 10:25). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| v.1 - The NIV translates the end of this verse 'this is your act of spiritual worship'. In the context of what has gone before in Romans, this is instructive, as the previous chapters have expounded to us the difference between the physical and the spiritual and the way that we should react and respond. Here, then is the conclusion - that we become living sacrifices. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:1 ‘present’ is the same word translated ‘yield’ in Rom 6:13. Our ‘living sacrifice’ is not something to boast about, rather it is a giving in to the will of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Rom 12:1,2 impress us with a description of a “Living sacrifice”. Under the Law of Moses sacrifices were animals which were killed. How things change in the New Testament! Our lives must be totally dedicated to Christ, (not as an animal was killed and therefore not able to live any more,) but as changed from the inside. Yes, we do die in baptism (Rom 6:3,4), but we are very much alive after our baptism (see Col 3:1-7). We are alive in Christ. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
||||||||||
v3 Here Paul is talking about the individual, and the innate selfishness of the individual. Instead we have to become selfless and part of a group, the Body of Christ v5, thinking now about the good of all, and not the good of the one. v18 Altho we know that we can't change others, we can change ourselves, and make every effort to promote the unity of the Body. By doing so, we hope that may influence others to do the same. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
12:4-7 Notice the first issue that Paul addresses after talking about the doctrines of Christ is unity amongst believers. Without unity no other problem can be resolved – but unity is the hardest thing to achieve. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:8 Showing ‘mercy’ cheerfully should be our attitude. So often we are grudging in the way that we are merciful to our brethren and sisters. Maybe someone has wronged us and apologized. We say we accept the apology – but harbor the thought that we hope we are never offended by that person again. Such thinking is wrong. ‘Forgive and forget’ is a good maxim to follow. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.20 Paul mirrors Prov 25:21,22. In Egyptian lore, a guilty individual would publicly carry a pan of hot coals on his head to show repentance. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
GIFTS AND BODY PARTS "We have different gifts according to the grace given us. If a man's gift is prophesying, let him use it in proportion to his faith. If it is serving, let him serve; if it is teaching, let him teach; if it is encouraging, let him encourage; if it is contributing to the needs of others, let him give generously; if it is leadership, let him govern diligently; if it is showing mercy, let him do it cheerfully." (Rom 12:6-8) All the above are described as gifts given to us by God. In many ways they are personality traits that each person is born with - some are natural servers, others are natural leaders and some are naturally generous. But as a gift from God, we should also look to the way God leads us and moulds our lives after we have committed ourselves to him. Often in our churches we try to be everything - but we were not built that way. We were not designed to be the body, but to be part of the body in order to fit in and work together with everyone else. What gift or gifts have you been given? Think of the things that you are good at and enjoy. Think of the areas of ministry God has led you in lately. Then we can work to develop those gifts the way he designed them to be. As our gifts are developed we can be more effective parts of the body for him. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
12:3 ‘Transformed’ <3339> is the word used of Jesus when he was ‘transfigured’ - Matt 17:2, Mark 9:2– and ‘changed’ in 2Cor 3:18. So this is not some insignificant change that God is seeking. It is a change that makes us like we are in the kingdom. We should behave as those who are brought back from the dead. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.2 The only way in which the (spiritual) mind can be renewed is by the daily reading of the Word, and by praying. Only after that, can one prove (test, discern) what is good. Added to scriptural knowledge and understanding must be works. Paul continues this chapter by giving a list of works that brethren of Christ ought to do. Knowledge, understanding, and faith, gained from reading the Word, are useless unless works are performed. James points this out (James 2:20). Furthermore, the correct attitude about performing works is essential. If one performs an honorable work with a negative attitude, rather than one of love, it does not count. Paul points this out to the Corinthians (1Cor 3:13). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
v2-3 Who would want to be a catterpillar when we can be as beautiful as a butterfly? The word used to describe this change that takes place (metamorphose) is behind the word 'transform' in v2. What a privilage we have in that our selfish minds (and ultimately in God's mercy our mortality) can be changed through the process of dwelling and responding to the things of God. And yet immeiately afterwards in v3 we are told not to think too highly of ourselves! This just highlights the problems of the mind of man whereby as soon as a great privilage is conferred on him he is prone to become puffed up and conceited. But let us also beware of thinking that we are beyond the care of our heavenly Father when we realise our failures because v2 should still apply to us. Lindsay Yuile [Glasgow South Scotland (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Lindsay |
||||||||||
|
12:9 ‘dissimulation’ <5272> is not a word we use regularly in everyday speech. It means ‘hypocrisy’ as cab be seen in the use of the same word in Matt 23:28which is a typical use of the word. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:1 The phrase reasonable service (AV) or spiritual worship (ESV) fails to convey the true meaning here. The word reasonable as used today in the english language has lost its true significance. We might think that this verse is suggesting It seems to be all right to offer our bodies as a living sacrifice whereas it's really telling us to think about the situation. The Greek word translated reasonable means logical, or rational. So Paul is inviting the reader to consider the matter and having done so, the reader will realise that this is the course of action he must take. It's much stronger than "that seems all right to me." J. B. Philips' paraphrase captures the idea by saying it's "an act of intelligent worship." Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2010 reply to Ken |
||||||||||