|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 11v.7
- God has put a difference. Nowhere in all of the plagues was this more noticeable
(until maybe this one) than in the plague of darkness (ch.10:22-23).
Israel, like us, had the light, while the 'rest of the world' had darkness. John
3:19, 8:12, 12:46, Eph.6:12. God has gone to great pains through the ages
to 'set apart' a people for himself. Ps.4:3,
Eph.2:10, 1Pet.2:9. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12
v.8 - There is a picture of ritual purity here, which God has instituted to
emphasise the importance of these things, that the people might have a process
by which to remember in years to come. The meat was not to be made unclean by
the use of water, nor the bread by the use of leaven. Notice also it says 'eat
the flesh' of it. Is Jesus refering to this, and the bread, when he speaks of
himself in John
6:48-56? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:7
That the Lord did not bring the plague of the death of the firstborn upon Israel,
like 8:23
the flies and 9:4
the murrain is not just because God is compassionate towards His own people. If
this were the case then a separation would have been made for all the plagues.
Rather, having experienced some of the plagues Israel, being spared the last three,
were to appreciate that God made a difference between the Egyptians and themselves.
Israel were being taught separateness.
12:12 Up to this point it would seem that the plagues have been random in their nature. However we learn that Yahweh is fighting the god of Egypt. It is a battle for the minds of the people. So we might conclude that the earlier plagues attacked the theology of Egypt as well. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
11:10 That God hardened Pharaoh's heart demonstrates that God wanted to punish Israel in Egypt. (see the comments on Chapter 8) 12:15 The command that unleavened bread was to be eaten for seven days demonstrates that whilst this Passover was a specific event it was to be remembered in future years even though the narrative reads like it is a one off event. So Israel would not have been surprised when they were told later (Leviticus 23) that they were to keep the feast annually. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| THE FIRST DAY Having been to a baptism last Saturday (Matthew Simpson's), the reading of the Passover took on a whole new dimension. The Passover was the day on which Israel were redeemed from their slavery and freed from their bondage. A baptism is the day when a person is freed from their bondage to sin and given new life in Jesus Christ. The Passover was the day when the faithful were saved by the blood of the lamb that was painted around and over the door of the house, protecting the inhabitants of that house from death. In the same way, at baptism we are saved by the blood of the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ. His blood saves us from death. At baptism we are baptized into the family of Christ. We must remain in the family until we are called into the kingdom. So, at the Passover, the meal was to be shared in families and they were not to go out of their houses, away from the covering until they were called to leave Egypt. But just as important, and more frequently forgotten, is that the Passover was to be the first day of the first month of the first year for Israel. At baptism we are born again making a fresh start. Let's make that day the first day of the first month of the first year for us, and just as they were to remember the Passover every year, so let us always remember the first day of our new life in the household of God, with our sins covered by the blood of the Lamb. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
11:5
- "And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die" - This
message was also meant for those children of Israel dwelling in the land too.
Any Israelite who refused to listen and who had no faith would suffer the fate
of the Egyptian households who did not follow the Passover instructions. The
fate of those among us who refuse to prepare for the return of Jesus, is to
likewise partake of the judgement prepared for the unheeding world at His return.
The antidote? Read, meditate and pray daily. Constant contact with the Father,
with ears open to His warnings will stand us in good stead when the time comes
soon to introduce the Son of God to a world that desperately needs Him.
11:9
- "Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you" - Pharaoh is a rebel...
and rebels "always know a better way!"
12:22
- "And strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood"
- Here was a great act of faith, for the doors at that time opened outward,
(not inward like our modern doors), therefore once the doors were shut to, no
blood would be seen from the outside. Yet the next verse says, "For
the Lord will pass through to smite the Egyptians and when He sees the blood
upon the lintel and on the two side posts, the Lord will pass over the door."
Only a divine eye, and an eye of faith, could *see* the blood on these door
posts.
12:40
- "Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, (who dwelt in Egypt)
was four hundred and thirty years" - By placing brackets around the
words indicated in this verse, we get the true picture. The children of Israel
were only actually in Egypt for 215 years, Jacob and his family arriving there
215 years after Abraham had been told that his family would be "a stranger
in a land that is not theirs, (and shall serve them and they shall afflict them),
four hundred years; and also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge:
and afterward (30 years after the 400 years had expired)
shall they come out with great substance" - Genesis
15:13-14. So the word of promise was true. Abraham's family dwelt in
the land of Canaan 215 years beyond God's words to Abraham, and a further 215
years in the land of Egypt.
For
those who may wish to explore another interesting point in this fundamental
chapter in Exodus 12, there is much evidence to prove that the very first Passover
recorded here in Egypt, took place on a Wednesday, with the lambs being slain
between 3pm and 6pm, just as Jesus was crucified on a Wednesday, dying on the
cross between 3pm and 6pm that day. If you would like to know more, you may
contact me via e-mail at cliffyork@ozemail.com.au Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
11:3 Both here and 12:36 we learn that God was involved in ensuring that the Egyptians gave Israel their wealth. Also Moses was ‘great’ in their sight – despite Pharaoh’s rebellion – so effective must the miracles have been in humbling the people. 12:6 It is an interesting contrast. Egypt suffered blackness – a plague from God. However Israel were to celebrate the Passover during the hours of darkness. When Egypt was in darkness Israel were redeemed. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The Passover lamb spoke of Jesus Christ. Exo 12:3-6 foretells Christ’s presence in Israel for 3 ˝ days (years). No bone was to be broken. The blood on the exit door was to surround them as they set out for the promised Land. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| Exo 12:26 We see again the importance of telling the children and the grandchildren the reson for this feast. ( See comment from yesterday's reading.) Exo 10. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
The tenth and final plague is wrought upon the rebellious Pharaoh, his followers, and his idolatrous system of worship. The number ten in scripture denotes perfection, completeness. Egypt was polytheistic, having countless gods. Yahweh did not address them all. He used just ten plagues to show His complete, victorious opposition to their idolatry. After the Babylonian exile, the names of the months changed to show the adoption of Babylonian names. Aviv became Nisan. It should also be noted that the beginning of the Jewish New Year was later changed from spring to fall where it stands today, in the month of Tishri. Incidentally, Tammuz, the Babylonian month for June-July was also retained in the Jewish calendar. In mythology, Tammuz (= Osiris = Nimrod) was killed by his lover Ishtar (= Astarte = Venus = Aphrodite = Diana = Semeramis) (see my note on Ex. 7 & 8). The earth faded (fall and winter) and people mourned his death (Eze 8:14). But he was resurrected and the earth attained full bloom once more in June-July. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 12:22 It appears that this regulation of not being allowed to go outside until morning was peculiar to the first feast only. It has been suggested by some that this would have been, to prevent suspicion of the Israeites being responible for the destruction of the Egyptians. There is an allusion to that. Isa 26:20 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
It is important to note that not one bone of the lamb was to be broken (12:46). This was to show that the Lamb of God, Jesus, would die with his bones in tact (John 12:34-36). We should be careful when quoting 1Cor 11:24 to understand that the broken in the KJV refers to the bread and not to the body (as in bones). Many like to use a modern rendering to avoid any confusion: e.g. the NIV reads: This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 11:3 - Just think what an amazing thing this was. Up until now the Egyptians saw the Israelites as so low that they happily inflicted great pain on them and felt nothing wrong with this. Now they are favouring them with expensive gifts. Here is a miracle of a greater degree than we might first think. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:5 - "without defect" just as Christ had no defect. 12:7 - the blood of the eaten sacrifice was on the door frame (just as Christ, who feeds us, is our door/gate John 10:7,9) protecting the chosen ones so they could later exit the door of slavery to the freedom and entrance to the promised land. Exo 12:22 - they weren't allowed freedom out the door till morning which is when Christ arose to freedom from the stone covering the pit.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
11:8 How do we think Moses’ anger fits into him being ‘meek’ Num 12:3?
12:18 ‘when ye be come into the land …’ provided Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Have you ever considered that 3500 years after the first passover feast was observed, Jewish familes still gather together and observe this special night in the history of Israel. It certainly must be a meaningful remembrance. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
12:35 it is interesting to think about why this happened. Probably for the building of the tabernacle, but it also provided for the golden calf. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
12:35 it is interesting to think about why this happened. Probably for the building of the tabernacle, but it also provided for the golden calf. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
|
The blood of salvation was to be applied to the two doorposts and to the lintel (12:22). It was not to be spread on the floor between the doorposts. The blood represents that of the Lord Jesus who, through His sacrifice as the perfect Lamb of God, can save humankind from death. Thus, He should be revered and not disrespected (Heb 10:29). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
11:1 Whereas Moses had initially asked that Pharaoh ‘let Israel’ Go they were going to be ‘thrust out’ marking the fact that the initial reaction of Pharaoh to the death of the firstborn was not a reluctant action. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:5 That the animal had to be ‘without blemish’ runs right throughout sacrificial language in the Old Testament and becomes the basis for Paul’s language – Eph 5:24when he speaks of the end point in our spiritual development. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:5 That the animal had to be ‘without blemish’ runs right throughout sacrificial language in the Old Testament and becomes the basis for Paul’s language – Eph 5:24when he speaks of the end point in our spiritual development. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Yahweh made a distinction between Egypt and Israel (11:7). Egypt is synonymous with sin (seed of the serpent); while Israel is the covenanted people of Yahweh (seed of the woman). That pattern has been consistent throughout human history. For the Passover a lamb was to be sacrificed 12:3). Lamb (Heb. seh ) refers to a member of the flock and could be either from sheep or goats (12:5). The Peace offering under the Law explains that the sacrifice could either be male or female (Lev 3:9-17). Thus, Jesus, who is represented by these sacrifices, covers all facets of humanity. It is interesting to note that, in Isa 53:7, Jesus is described as a lamb (Heb. seh = sheep or goat); and a sheep (Heb. rachel meaning ewe, thus embracing the female gender).The lamb was to be taken in on the tenth day of the first month, and sacrificed on the fourteenth day (12:3,6). This is indicative of Jesus' three-and-one half years' ministry after which He was crucified (sacrificed) (i.e. in His fourth year of ministry). 12:17-20 Leven (yeast) is a symbol of corruption (Lev 2:11; 1Cor 5:7,8). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
11:10 ‘all these wonders’ spoken before the final plague must mean that the point being made is that everything that has happened up to now forms part of the wonderful evidence that God provided to Israel – and to the nations who heard of these things as did the men of Jericho – Josh 2:10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
11:2 The word borrow in the KJV is an unfortunate translation. A better translation would be request (ask). Borrowing has the connotation of temporary use of something with the intention of handing back what was loaned. In this case, the request for jewellery was for permanent ownership with no intention of handed it back. 11:3 Moses was admired by the Egyptians, and so he was never accosted throughout the plague period. 12:10 Nothing was to be left to putrefy. The same reasoning applied to the feeding of the 5000+ (John 6:12,13) and the 4000+ (Mark 8:8). Nothing was to be left to rot (Matt 16:9-11). The paschal lamb represented Christ, as did the bread. During the wilderness journey, the manna also was symbolic of Christ (John 6:58). Likewise, the manna would decay if all was not eaten within the allotted time (Exo 16:19,20). All these incidents pointed forward to Christ’s three-day sojourn in the grave. Yahweh, the Father, would not allow His Son, the bread of life, to rot in the grave (Psa 16:10). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Christ is the prophesied passover lamb slain for the sins of believers - Exo 12:1-11;Isa 53:7;John 1:29-36;1Cor 5:7-8;Rev 5:6-14;7:14;21:22-27;22:1-4. No bone was broken so that the inspired word of the Bible might be fulfilled - Exo 12:46;Num 9:12;Psa 34:20;22:17;John 19:36. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| Exo 12:48 - perhaps a symbolic echo of hope for Gentiles in Christ. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
12:29-30 The cry of terror at midnight contrasts markedly with the cry at midnight that the bridegroom has arrived - Matt 25:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The death of the firstborn of Egypt (i.e. the bondage of mortal sinful fleshly nature) while the first born of Israel lived on echos Christ's blow to the heel where his body did not see corruption (Exo 11:5-7;4:22-23;Num 3:11-13;Psa 89:24-29;Matt 1:22-25;Luke 2:7,21-24;Gen 3:15;Psa 16:10;Acts 2:22-31;Rom 8:29;Col 1:15-20;Heb 11:28;Rev 1:5). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
There is a neat symmetry about the story of Moses in Egypt. At the time of his birth, Pharaoh ordered the death of all hebrew males, Exo 1:22 then at the time of his re-birth, God ordains the destruction of all the Egyptian firstborn males. Exo 12:29 Did Pharaoh now think back to the words of Moses in Exo 4:22, I wonder? This was the first act of the process referred to in Exo 13:2, where God says his firstborn are to be sanctified, or set apart. See also Num 3:13 Exo 12:27 We should be careful about how we understand the idea of God passing over. Popular belief would have us think of this in terms of an angel literally passing over the land of Egypt. To start with, that would indicate that an angel has wings (!), but in any case the idea of passing over is in the sense of sparing or leaving out - as we might say he's been passed over for promotion. In these events, we are able to behold the goodness and severity of God Rom 11:22 Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2010 reply to Ken |
||||||||||
Exo 12:2 - Jesus was a new beginning in the redemptive work of God; baptism is also a new beginning in Christ. Exo 12:3 - it was on this day, six days before the Passover celebration on the 15th of Nisan that the anointing of Jesus took place in Bethany (John 12:1-7); Mary was identifying Jesus as the lamb of sacrifice. Exo 12:4 - believers do not have to feel alone, too small or too poor in spirit to partake of the sacrifice of Christ; believers have fellowship (with each other) to share this responsibility. Exo 12:5 - Christ has no fault or blemish (Heb 9:14); Jesus was one of the flock and shared the nature of those he died to save. Exo 12:6 - the sacrifice was to take place on the 14th day in the evening; Christ died on the cross at the same timethe slaying of the passover lamb began; today "the whole assembly" of believers should gladly celebrate that the Lord laid on Jesus the iniquity of us all. Exo 12:7 - signified the redeeming power of the blood of the lamb and foreshadowed the redeeming power of the blood of Christ. Exo 12:9 - the sacrifice of the lamb was not to be polluted with anything. Exo 12:8 - leaven was connected to sin/slavery/Egypt while unleavened was connected to purity and freedom from, and the fleeing of, sin and corruption (1Cor 5:7-8; Matt 16:11-12). Exo 12:11 - believers partake of the "passover lamb" with great anticipation of their ultimate redemption in Christ (1Pet 1:13). Exo 12:12 - the reign of death will come over all not numbered among the Lord's firstborn. Exo 12:13 - death will pass over those protected by Christ's blood. Exo 12:14 - when believers partake of the wine and bread it is done in remembrance of Christ (1Cor 11:23-26). Much of the above is gleaned from a talk entitled "Passover" by M.S. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
Exo 12:16 - a minimum of attention to worldly interest and a lack of dependence upon one's own good works as a means of salvation. Exo 12:19 - "Let a man examine himself and so let him eat" (1Cor 11:28). Exo 12:22 - Hyssop is associated with cleansing from sin (John 19:29); Christ wasn't freed and cleansed till morning. Exo 12:26-27 - until Jesus came, this was the only sacrifice that didn't have an altar or a priest; and like the sacrifice of Christ, it was three kinds of sacrifices in one; in the sprinkling of the blood it was a sin offering; because it was roast with fire it was a burnt offering; and in the eating of it, it was a peace offering. Exo 12:38 - a mixed multitude; Jews and grafted in Gentiles heirs to God's promises/blessings. Exo 12:45 - The Passover is not for those who are strangers from the covenants of promise; it is for those Jesus calls not hired servants, but friends. Exo 12:46 - like the Passover lamb, Jesus had his bones not broken that scripture might be fulfilled; Christ is not divided, anyone doing so breaks God's law. Exo 12:47 - all believers must remember the blood of the Passover lamb, Jesus Christ. Exo 13:5 - "When the Lord shall bring thee into the Land of the Canaanites which he swore unto thy father to give thee", we are reminded that the first observance of Passover was also a prophecy of inheritance; the Passover we read in Matt 26:2,17,26-29 is also a prophecy of yet a better inheritance, "until it be fulfilled in the Kingdom of God" (Luke 22:15-16). Much of the above is gleaned from a talk entitled "Passover" by M.S. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 66v.10
- 'tried as silver is tried'. This talks (v.11)
of the chastening that God builds us with, which leads (v.12)
to a wealthy place. Just as the Children of Israel wandered in the wilderness
to be proved - Deut.8:2,16,
13:3 and then to enter (the next generation) into a wealthy place - flowing
with milk and honey. Likewise we should allow ourselves to be shaped (Heb.12:11
- be exercised by it) by the refiner -
Prov.17:3, Isa.48:10, Zech.13:9. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 67
v.1 - To 'cause his face to shine' comes several times - Psa.80:3,7,19,
Dan.9:17. Add to this the face of Moses that shone when he returned from the
mount - Exo.34:29-35,
the face of Jesus at the transfiguration - Luke
9:28,29, and this all leads to the principle discussed in 2Cor.4:6 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 66:6
In speaking of the Exodus the Psalmist is returning to a theme often used by faithful
man and women in Scripture. He is taking comfort from the fact that God has worked
in the past. Such a way of thinking can only come to those who are both aware
of what God has done in the past recorded in Scripture and who can see the hand
of God in their lives in the past.
Psalm 67 - The shining of God upon Moses caused his face to shine - Exodus 34:30 in like manner the Gospel should change our appearance - that is our lives should be seen to have changed by the influence of the Gospel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
66:12 The way in which the Psalmist talks about going through fire and water is echoed by Isaiah (43:2). Both these passages must have been a comfort to those cast into the fiery furnace (Daniel 3:20) 67:4 In seeking for the nations to glad we see a picture of the kingdom when Christ will rule over all nations. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm
66 - "To the chief Musician" is the subscription to Psalm
65. Psalm 66 truly begins with the words "A song or Psalm"
Psalm
67 - "To the chief Musician on Neginoth" is the subscription
to Psalm 66. Psalm 67 truly begins with the words "A Psalm or song" Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
66:10-11 It is instructive that David saw his troubles as God ‘proving’ him and that he was being ‘tried’ – it is so easy to see our problems as a problem in our lives rather than our Father working for our eternal well being. 67:6 When the world things that there are problems with over population and a shortage of food and we hear dire warnings of global famine the way that God can care for His creation is encouraging. Remember in Egypt he blessed the harvest so the seven years of plenty provided enough for Egypt and also other countries for the seven years of famine. Also the year before every seventh year would bring forth, in Israel, enough to provide for the seventh year and the year after. We can, then, understand Psa 72:16. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 66 This Psalm of David could well have been one that would have been sung at the time of the passover. ( interesting as we have earlier today read of the first passover feast.) Exo 12 Psalm 67 A prayer for the universal acceptance and recognition of the God of Israel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Psa 66 - LET ME TELL YOU "Come and listen, all you who fear God; let me tell you what he has done for me." (Psa 66:16) We hear all the old stories about Noah, Moses, David, Elijah and the Apostles, and how God worked in their lives. God did some really amazing things in their lives to prove to us that he does work in the lives of his people. Those stories should motivate us to want to live up to their high standard, knowing that God will always be with us. It is important that we know the stories from the Bible in this way, and that we can see how God worked in the lives of his people all those years ago. But God has not stopped working in the lives of his people. If David had thought that, he would have finished this psalm at verse 7 after Israel had passed through the sea on dry land. But no, he carried on and said, "Let me tell you what God has done for me!" David's own personal story was one of answered prayer. Every one of us has a personal story of what the Lord has done for us. We all have a story about how we became a believer and how God has shown himself to be working in our lives. It may not seem that special to you, but your story might be the one someone needs to hear that will strengthen their faith in the LORD their God. So let's not let people think that God's work stopped about 2000 years ago as the last pen was put down from the New Testament writings, but instead let's tell and listen to stories of faith in our lives today that show God to be alive and active in the lives of his people. "Come and listen, all you who fear God; Let me tell you what he has done for me." Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| Before we approach the LORD in prayer, we should examine our motives and attitude. If they are not acceptable to Him, then He will not hear our prayer (66:18). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| 66:18-20 - We maybe know these words well from singing them. Here is great comfort for us. We know the truth of verse 18, and yet we also know that we each, like the psalmist, do regularly regard iniquity in our hearts. Let us be glad and rejoice that God has heard us anyway and will attend to the voice of our prayers spoken in faith. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psa 66:16 is an invitation from David for the people to come and listen to him as he recounts what God has done for him. What a great idea! We could do that, after a meeting, individually to anyone who will listen, or even to a group of brothers and sisters. "I won't keep you a minute, but let me just tell you how God blessed me today. I was ….." The possibilities are endless.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
66:3 Whilst the nations did submit to Solomon and came, as did the queen of
67:1-2 When the kingdom is established the nations will, on seeing the way in which God blesses repentant Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
66:5 The requests ‘come and see’ what God has done is the most powerful evidence to the existence of God and that He is working in the world. So – John 1:39– when two of Jesus’ disciples asked where he was staying he said ‘come and see’ – the invitation to become involved in the work by seeing the abode, getting involved with the man Jesus Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
67:5 The desire for the nations to praise God is not just a nice thought that the Psalmist had. It comes from a realisation that this is what the kingdom will bring. The kingdom is not just a pleasant time where the evils of this life will be done away. It is a time when mankind will praise God as they ought. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
BLESSINGS A common request of God is that he would bless us. There are many ways in which this blessing could be received: in health, money, possessions, relationships, or prosperity, among others. Yet it seems blessings are often asked for with selfish motives. The perspective is that if we are blessed we will have an easier life. This is not necessarily the case. A friend sent me a definition of blessing a few weeks ago. She said that a blessing is anything that draws us toward God, while a curse is anything that takes us away from God. By this definition, even loss, destruction and hardship can be blessings, because, more often than not, they draw us toward God. When the Psalmist asked for blessings from God, he was not thinking of himself, but of the people whose lives had not yet been touched by God. He said, "May God be gracious to us and bless us and make his face shine upon us, that your ways may be known on earth, your salvation known among the nations." (Psa 67:1-2) When we ask God to bless us, let's do what the psalmist did and ask with the motivation that God's blessing in us will become a blessing to anyone who knows us, drawing them toward God. When God's blessings flow let's not let them stop at us, but let them continue to pour out on everyone we see. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
66:16 ‘come and hear’ complements the ‘come and see’ of verse :5. But whereas the Psalmist is looking at what God has done to others he is now going to speak about what God has done personally for him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
66:18,19 Yahweh will not hear the prayer of the wicked nor accept their sacrifices (Prov 15:8). The phrase regard iniquity in my heart has the meaning in Hebrew of taking pleasure in wickedness. We must void ourselves of any fleshly distractions if we wish to be heard by the Heavenly Father. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
67:1-2 God’s glory – His shining face – is seen in those that believe in Him. However that benefit should be seen by others. Hence the gospel should change the way in which we live. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psa 66:13 "I will pay You my vows" occurs in many other of David's Psalms. David appears to have promised (vowed) to praise God in the assembly of Israel (see Psa 22:22-25) in return for help in his hour of danger (22:19-21). This vow was with him constantly, and writing the Psalms was one way of keeping it. This Psalm 66 is one example, which starts by praising God, and finishes by declaring openly David's own need for God, and a call to others to hear David's story of personal deliverance (v16-20). Do we declare it aloud when we are personally helped by God? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 66:18 demands action from us. The answer is found in Psa 51:10, Psa 73:1 although we should not expect it to be easy (Prov 20:9) as Paul tells us in Rom 7:15 Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2010 reply to Ken |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.13
- angels ministered - he was thus sustained - like Moses in the mount for the
same length of time - Ex.34:28
- and as his role of saviour - Deut.9:25.
Like Elijah in the wilderness for the same length of time - 1Kings
19:8. This was an important
common aspect which binds together these three that met on the mount of transfiguration.
From all of this, of course, we also benefit. Heb.2:17,18,
4:15. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.15
- The 'time' that was fulfilled is the time spoken of by Daniel [9:25].
Mark is wishing to inform us that the coming of Jesus is actually the fulfilment
of the promise of the coming of Messiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1:2
'As it is written in the prophets
' We are so familiar with the fact that
Jesus was promised in the Old Testament that we may just take it for granted.
As you read Old Testament Scripture ask 'How does this speak of Jesus?' Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Mark
1:40-45 - An interesting theme develops in these verses as Jesus heals a leper
who would have had his abode outside the city. After healing the man, he enters
the city, but Jesus is forced out into the desert places. The leper and Jesus
swapped places. Cliff York [Pine Rivers (Aus)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Cliff |
||||||||||
|
1:4 We are so familiar with the fact that John baptised 'in the wilderness' that maybe we don't think abut the logistics of this. Anyone who wanted to see John had to make an effort. We might have thought he would have been more effective if he was in Jerusalem. However his work impacted on individuals who lived as far away as Ephesus 18:25 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Mark 1 With Mark portraying Christ as the servent, we have a plain introduction as the "Son of God" In Matthew where Christ is portrayed as a king, it was necessary to show He was a descendant of David, (kingship) and of Abraham. (father of a great nation) Matt 1:1 Different roles necessitated different introductions. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| v.14 - Here we see a little insight into the reason for the discourse in Matt 11:2-5, where it seems quite surprising that John should need to ask the question 'Art thou he that should come or look we for another'. Here we see that John saw none of the mircales and heard none of the preaching. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Mark is the second of the three synoptic (seeing together) Gospel accounts. Matthew and Luke form the other two. They view the same incidents from different vantage points. To better understand a particular event, the three Gospels should be cross-referenced. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| v.2 - Here is the fulfilment of Mal 3:1. The people had had to wait some hundreds of years without any prophet or revelation and were doubting and sceptical about the arrival of this promised saviour. The human nature of which we are ade does not naturally and easily believe in God's promises. Constant contact with His word and with Him in prayer will keep us faithful, and awaiting his second appearance. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:5 We might think that 'confessing sins' was a New Testament concept. However we find Dan 9:20 - confessing his sins. The difference is that here in Mark it is a public confession whereas with Daniel it was a private affair in his prayer. Of course there is place for both today. Baptism is the public confession and our private confession takes place in our prayers. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
We notice the frequent use by Mark of the Greek word eutheos translated "straightway, forthwith, immediately' 1:10-12 After Jesus had received the power of God, he had to wrestle with how he was going to use it - for his own purpose or for God's. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
| The first miracle Mark records is of Jesus healing a man with an unclean spirit in the synagogue at Capernaum. If you have never thought about the order in which the Gospel writers record Jesus’ actions, can I suggest that this is a central part of their narrative? We know that each writer has a theme to which he adheres, and the order he puts the events in his writing is surely important. Jesus had power over the illnesses which ordinary people could not control. He is Lord of all. And if Mark is telling of Christ as the “Servant”, this power immediately places Him next to God in power. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
||||||||||
|
1:1 Notice that Mark’s ‘beginning’ is the announcement of Jesus by John. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1:31 Mark is unique in the gospels for the repeated mention that Jesus took the person he was healing ‘by the hand’ here, 5:41, 8:23 , 9:27 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Jesus showed the power of His Father, and established Himself, by healing. However, He came to preach the kingdom of God (vs.14,38). This pattern of miracle working to underscore the gospel preaching was continued by his disciples (e.g. Acts 8:5,6). Since the Biblical record was completed (in the first century), preaching alone has been the remaining task for the disciples of Jesus. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:8There was great wonderment as to whether John was indeed the Messiah to which he said ‘No’ – John 12:1 In speaking of the one coming after baptising with the Holy Spirit John is reinforcing the point that he is not the one to come but a more important one is to follow him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:8 There was great wonderment as to whether John was indeed the Messiah to which he said ‘No’ – John 12:1 In speaking of the one coming after baptising with the Holy Spirit John is reinforcing the point that he is not the one to come but a more important one is to follow him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:8 There was great wonderment as to whether John was indeed the Messiah to which he said ‘No’ – John 12:1 In speaking of the one coming after baptising with the Holy Spirit John is reinforcing the point that he is not the one to come but a more important one is to follow him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.6 tells us that John ate locusts and honey. These foods have both positive and negative connotations. Locusts are high in protein and sanctioned under the Law (Lev 11:22). Honey is also highly nutritious and was used as a symbol of the bounty of Israel (Num 14:8). On the other hand, locusts were instruments of destruction (Exo 10:14,15; 2Chron 7:13). Honey was not allowed to be added to sacrifices (Lev 2:11). This was because honey, like yeast, produced fermentation which represented corruption (Matt 16:6-12; 1Cor 5:6-8; Gal 5:9). Thus, in John's choice of food, he preached two options: nutrition which promoted life or corruption which led to destruction. Choosing the nutritious bread of life (Jesus) would lead to life (v.4); choosing apostate doctrine would lead to destruction (death) (Matt 3:10). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The context of the coming of Jesus Jesus' ministry is in the context of Deut 28. The people had drifted so far away from God that He had brought upon them the curses held in this chapter. Ilness and the Roman occupation are the most obvious examples. So by telling them to repent (Mark 1:15) and healing the effects of the curse, he was signalling God's willingness to forgive and restore them to a healthy and prosperous nation (Deut 28:1-2, 8-13, 15). Had they heeded Jesus' message, this restoration would have happened. But as we know, they killed the bearer of that message instead. The Gospels will make much more sense to us if we read about Jesus with this framework in mind. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
v 14 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Gospel concerns God's Kingdom Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
1:11 The voice from heaven ‘thou art my beloved son’ is seen again as Jesus is on the cross – Mark 15:39 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Mark manages to convey an urgency about the work of Jesus in these opening chapters. Straightaway: Mark 2:1, Mark 1:10,18,20,21 Immediately: Mark 1:12,28,42 , Mark 2:8,12 Forthwith: Mark 1:29,43 As soon as: Mark 1:42 Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2010 reply to Ken |
||||||||||