|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.5
- These practices were not a matter of fashion. God was not here telling them
not to take on certain fashions in appearance. Fashion is of no consequence before
God, except where is cuts across the line of common decency, but these were things
which the nations around did when people close to them died, and therefore had
a religious significance. God is obviously not telling them never to cut their
flesh, as the very token of his covenant involved them doing just that. He is
informing them about the way they should behave towards death, which after all
was only the end of this life for those who were faithful, that they might await
the one to come. The parallel passages make this clearer.
Lev.19:27,28, Deut 14:1. See also Lev.10:6, Isa.15:2, 22:12, Jer.16:6, 48:37,
Eze.44:20, Amos 8:10, Mic.1:16. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 21:1
- 2 The Nazarite was called to higher degree of separation than the priest
as he could not be defiled for any dead person no matter how closely related he
was to the dead. 21:9 be burned with fire Revelation 18:8 The destruction of Babylon draws on the death of a priests daughter who has played the whore because Babylon - Rome has done just that. The truth of the gospel was corrupted by the ones who should have kept it pure and so prostituted the message. The way in which Revelation 18 portrays Babylon develops this image - of a daughter who has turned to harlotry rather like Israel as described in Ezekiel 16. 21:10 The separation of the high priest is of the same order as the Nazarite - though the Nazarite was a man who chose to separate himself the high priest had no choice. Jesus combines both the high priest and the Nazarite - he was born the son of God but 'took on himself the form of a servant' so electing to suffer and electing to separate himself like the Nazarite. It is for this reason that 'he is able to save to the uttermost ...' Hebrews 7:25. 21:16 - 23 The law regarding priests that were blemished is not discrimination against the disabled. It is a pattern of how we, as part of the bride of Christ is to be Ephesians 5:27 'not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish'. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The rules for
the priest and his family are much stricter it seems than for the 'common people'.
Let us recognise that in type as we apply these things to ourselves, we are not
the common people, but the priests - we are a royal priesthood, a peculiar people
- we are the ones with the vow, which we took at baptism. The principles we should
apply to our spiritual lives should match the strictures of the principles described
in this chapter. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :18
The prohibition upon a man with a physical deformity is not an indication that
God does not like the appearance of a disfigured person. Whilst we may manifest
such attitudes God does not. The prohibition is to teach that God requires perfection.
The man with a blemish is not as he Adam was created who is the image and likeness
of God. As in the natural so in the spiritual. Whilst God is not looking for physical
beauty in His children he is looking for spiritual completeness. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :11
That the high priest could not be defiled even for close relatives is not a callous
requirement of the law. Rather it taught that the things of God are more important
that family ties and so the Jew looking at the high priest would (it is hoped)
realise that separation to God requires a degree of commitment that most are not
willing to make. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The way that the High Priest was barred from certain actions which might be seen as simply compassionate things that a man would do in the case of a family trauma are to mark the point that service to God is single – nothing should come between the man and his service to God. If we aspire to be priest in the kingdom we must have that singleness of mind now – not that we should not meet the needs of family. But rather appreciate what has the first priority. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.6 "The bread of their God" This was the shew bread, but points forward to John 6:33 Were we see the aspect of salvation which the gospel discloses and offers. The true bread in which we and true beleivers over the ages have put their trust in. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| God’s priests had to be especially holy. They had to abstain from all appearance of evil. Even birth defects barred priests from entering into the Most Holy Place, and from the altar Lev 21:21-23, because humanity must be cleansed and purified before they can approach God Exo 29. God however allowed these "impure" priests to eat the holy bread. That’s mercy. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| Under the Law, the high priest could not defile himself (v.11). Contrast him with our high priest, Jesus, who defiled himself by taking on infirmities (Matt 8:17) and raising the dead (Luke 8:54). But, His greatest defilement was on the cross where he died for our sakes (Gal 3:13). Praise Yahweh. V.5 Yahweh forbade the priests to shave bald spots on their heads, or the corner of their beards; or to cut themselves. This was in order to keep them separate from the practices of neighboring pagans. The Egyptian priests, for example, used to shave themselves every three days to appear clean for service. We recall a later example of the prophets of Baal who attempted to stir up their god by cutting themselves (1Kin 18:27,28). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
21:7 The relationship between the priest and his wife should match that of the relationship between God and His people. Hence the priest was called to an high principle. We, likewise, are in the same position. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The high priest was not permitted to rend his clothes (v.10). However, that is exactly what happened during the interrogation of Jesus before His crucifixion (Matt 26:65). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
21:1 The constraints laid upon the sons of Aaron about how to deal with the death of family matters may well be the basis for Jesus’ words ‘Let the dead bury the dead’ Matt 8:22, Luke 9:60 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.16-24 In all these regulations regarding the High Priest preserving both the character and the office, point forward to our High Priest. In Heb 7:26 we read that our High Priest was harmless and undefiled, then in V.28 the writer says "the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity". Arron was made a High Priest without an oath, all promises connected with eternal life are made with an oath, note V.28 again John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
21:5 The injunction not to cut the flesh was violated by the prophets of Baal –1Kin 18:25 – as if self harming would please their God. It is an example of trying to earn approval from God by one’s own actions. ‘If I suffer then God is bound to listen to me’ sort of way of thinking. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Yahweh imposed strict rules for being a priest because priests were to reflect His perfection. Priests had to emulate Him (Lev 20:7). Peter quotes from Lev 20:7 as an underpinning for the behavior of true believers in Christ who will be the priests of the Kingdom Age (1Pet 1:15,16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
21:1-2 Here we see a formalisation of what Aaron, Eleazar and Ithamar were told – Lev 10:6 when Nadab and Abihu died before the Lord with the provision that family members could be dealt with, which contrasts with the situation in Lev 10:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
V.7 The word for profane (defile, pollute) in Hebrew is halal . Ironically, halal is to Moslems what kosher is to Jews. Halal dietary laws largely follow kosher choice and preparation of foods. There are some differences, though: for example, halal allows for eating camel, whereas kosher does not. In this case, Moslems accept only the requirement that the camel chew the cud. The camel fails the second requirement under the Law, that the hoof be cloven (Lev 11:4).It is not uncommon to see Moslems shopping for food items in Jewish kosher stores. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Lev. 21:5 It is interesting given the commandment under the law not to make baldness and yet that in Act 21:23 in order to calm the Jews and prove that Paul honoured the law it says Acts 21:23-24 While it does not appear to be for the dead it certainly seemed to be a common practice. Paul again does it in Acts 18:18 Acts 18:18 Alex Browning [Toronto East, Canada] Comment added in 2009 reply to Alex |
||||||||||
21:7 This constraint relating to marriage will apply to the mortal priest in the age to come – Eze 44:22 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
It is implied in this chapter that the wife of a priest was counted as being one with him. We can see this because she is not mentioned in v2 or v11. It is simply taken for granted that she is an exception to this "defilement" rule. When he chooses a wife she is to be holy like him (v6-7, 13-15). This brings across a strong message to us about marriage. Do we choose someone who can be holy to God along with us? However, we should bear in mind that physical purity (in the sense of v7) isn't an indication of inner purity, and therefore we should not use it as a reason not to marry someone we love and who shares our faith. Rahab and Ruth are great examples of this, marrying and bringing forth the holy line of David and Jesus. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 120
v. 2
- If I said this, I would be asking for deliverance from the consequences of my
own words, but not David. He has such an enviable confidence in himself, and is
here, as on many other occasions, bemoaning the behaviour of his enemies and requesting
deliverance. What an amazing example he is. Ps.109:1,2,
140:1-3, Matt.26:59-62. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 121
v.7 - We need to ask God continually, as Jesus instructed us to (Matt.6:13),
to keep us from evil. This is one of the verses that assures us that he will respond
to that plea. Here are one or two more. Psa.91:9-10,
Job 5:19-27, Prov.12:21, Rom.8:28,35-39, 2Tim.4:18 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 120 This is the first of the 15 'Songs of Degrees' as the titles call them. They seem to have been sung as Israel made their ascent to the temple for the feasts. This Psalm presents faithful Israel seeking the peace of the kingdom against the background of the animosity of the nations round about. Psalm 121 This Psalm starts with a question. '… from whence cometh my help?' the Psalmist has seen the hills surrounding Jerusalem and realises that the nations around- and some in Israel - worship false gods on the hills. He then states his realisation that it is only from the Lord that help comes - not from the false gods around him. Psalm 122 v4 is speaking of Jerusalem as the place where the tribes go up the Psalmist is talking of a very short time in Israel's history. Only during the reign of Solomon did all the tribes go up to worship at the 'house of God' after that the kingdom was divided and only the faithful from the ten tribes would even try to go to the temple. Of course this Psalm will have it's fulfilment in the kingdom when Israel are restored and worship God in truth. Psalm 123 In lifting his eyes to the Lord the Psalmist is contrasting himself with the enemies of the Lord in Psalm 121. The touching and powerful way in which he speaks of the commitment of the servant and the love of the maid look to their lord we see a picture of ones who desire to serve. Is this a description of our relationship with our father? Psalm 124 The references to escaping as a bird out of a snare (v7) may well be a reference to the deliverance of Hezekiah from the Assyrians. The Sennacherib Prism records that Hezekiah was trapped 'as a bird in a cage'. Of course Sennacherib would not want to record the destruction of his army. The mention of the overflowing waters (4) could be a reference to the words of Isaiah who foretold the Assyrian invasion (Isaiah 8:8, 28:2 ) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
120:6 The Psalmist shows his true feelings for those he dwells with. Not for him the fellowship of men of darkness. Rather he is for God's peace (:7) 121:5 In speaking of God as 'shade' we see echoes of Psalm 17:8, 36:7 57:1 63:7. 122:5 In saying thrones the Psalmist is looking to the kingdom when the disciples will sit on 12 thrones (Matthew 19:28) 123:2 In the analogies given about the way that servants and maiden look to their masters we see a beautiful image of how we should regard our God. Both the servant and maiden are required by their master to obey them - Not by constraint but willingly likewise we are to be unstinting in our service 1 Peter 5:2. 124:1-3 The Psalmist - against the background of severe trial of an enemy - sees exactly who had given deliverance. It is so easy to seek God when in difficulty but to forget Him when the problem is over. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
120:4 ‘coals of Juniper’ – Juniper = broom see RV margin is possibly a reference to charcoal made from the Juniper or broom tree. 121:3 In saying that God ‘will not slumber’ David is expressing a simple truth about God’s care for His children – but surprisingly not an expression one finds elsewhere – now here is an opportunity for you to show I have not been thorough in my checking! 122:3 ‘compacted’ is the same word found Exo 26:4 ‘coupled’ speaking of the curtains . 123:3 One might think that the Psalmist has contempt for himself until we see (v4) that it is others that think so of him. But notice the Psalmist is not seeking to assert his own position. He leaves things in God’s hands. 124:4 If this is a Psalm of Hezekiah we might see in the overwhelming waters a reference to the Assyrian who was a river which reached unto the neck in the days of Hezekiah (Isa 8:7-8) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 120 From this Psalm we learn that we have a loving Heavenly Father who is prepared to help those who put their trust in Him. This was Hezekiah's experience and it can be ours as well. Psalm 121 This Psalm reveals the unwavering trust that Hezekiah had in God. He knew that his only help lay in God, and that God would protect his going out and coming in.We must learn to develope such a trust in God ourselves despite the faith destroying materialism of the age we live. Psalm 123 This Psalm outlines Hezekiah's cry for mercy. It shows his humility as he waited patiently and looked for God to have mercy on him. The lesson for us is that we too must place reliance upon God in the distresses of life. We must wait patiently, with our hope in God, for the outworking of His plans in our lives. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| REJOICING IN JERUSALEM The call will come again to go up to Jerusalem to worship. Many times I have heard it said, "Next year in Jerusalem!" but so far that dream has not been brought into reality. Zechariah speaks of the time when all the people of the earth will go up to worship at Jerusalem every year. It is interesting to see what feast they go to celebrate. It will be the feast of Tabernacles. Of all the feasts and holy days celebrated by Israel, the feast of Tabernacles was the most joyful one. Others were days of solemn remembrance and one was even a day of fasting and mourning, but the feast of Tabernacles was always a happy celebration, celebrating the harvest and God's provision in bringing Israel into the Promised Land. As a feast in the kingdom it will also be one of joy to celebrate the harvest of the earth - God's people redeemed and made immortal, and God's provision in bringing them into the kingdom. Until then we still wait for the all to go up to Jerusalem. When it comes there will be great rejoicing. "I rejoiced with those who said to me, 'Let us go to the house of the LORD.' Our feet are standing in your gates, O Jerusalem." (Psa 122:1-2) May they be our feet and our voices, not only in the streets of Jerusalem, but inside the city, rejoicing in the LORD. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| Today it’s a thought I heard from someone else. There are 15 “Songs of Degrees”. 5 have been written by David (or Solomon as in the title of Psa 127). This leaves 10, with no author recorded. Could they be from Hezekiah’s pen? God made the sun go back 10 degrees for him, as a sign (2Kin 20:8-11). It’s possible that that miracle inspired him to write 10 psalms. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
120:2 We might think we are capable of seeing through people who try to deceive us. The Psalmist, on the other hand, asks that God will deliver him. Not for him the wisdom of humans skills to extricate himself from evil men.
121:1-2 Idol worshippers looked to the high places for their support. David, by contrast, looks to God. His house is nestling in the middle of the hills Psa 125:5 122:1 What is our immediate reaction if someone asks us to go to a meeting with them? Do the things of the kingdom stir joyful emotions?
123:4 How do we feel when people scorn the things of the gospel? Is it something that troubles us or can we hear blasphemy and mocking and remain unmoved? How should we feel?
124:3 ‘quick’ is the old English for ‘alive’. As such the swallowing up of the living is rather like the destruction of Korah and his company – Num 16:32. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
As previously mentioned, Psalms 120 -134 are known as the Songs of Degrees. Hezekiah received 15 extra years of life from God (2Kin 20:6; Isa 38:5) and we have a total of 15 Psalms in this collection. Also, as David Simpson mentioned, 10 Psalms were written by an anonymous person and perhaps even by Hezekiah himself reminding us of the shadow God moved backward 10 degrees (2Kin 20:8-11; Isa 38:8). At Hezekiah's recovery he praised God in eloquent song (Isa 38:9-20) and in the final verse 20 made an interesting pledge which may have some relevance to these Songs of Degrees. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
121:4 We learnt that he God who always keeps His eye on the nation of Israel also is concerned for the individual for He uses the same language to speak of both the nation and the individual. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
121:5 It is easy to see the Psalmist speaking of God as his God but here we see a more intimate expression. The Psalmist speaks of God as his ‘keeper’. He recognises that his God cares for him. We need to recognise that God is not only our Lord but the one who cares for us as a father does his children. We need to develop a close relationship with Him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Ps. 121 is a wonderful assurance to Israel that the LORD is an ever-present help. That assurance is for the true believers of Jesus also. The language is clear and easy to understand. But, do we accept it simply and without reservation? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
GOD IS MERCIFUL David was put in a tough spot when he was told to choose one of three punishments from the LORD. He was given the choice of either "three years of famine, three months of being swept away before your enemies, with their swords overtaking you, or three days of the sword of the LORD - days of plague in the land, with the angel of the LORD ravaging every part of Israel." (1Chron 21:12 David made his choice, and the reason behind his decision was an interesting one. He said, "Let me fall into the hands of the LORD, for his mercy is very great; but do not let me fall into the hands of men." (v.13) David knew that justice and mercy come from the LORD. David knew that the LORD loved his people Israel and because of that love he would never hurt them more than they deserved or could cope with. Bad things happen to us. Often God will have let them happen or even brought them on. But we will not get the same mercy and love from anyone else. That is why the psalmist said, "I lift my eyes to you, to you whose throne is in heaven. ... So our eyes look to the LORD our God, till he shows us his mercy." (Psa 123:1-2) Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
120:7 David was amongst those that Jesus described as ‘blessed’ –Matt 5:9 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Psalm 120 begins a series of fifteen psalms that are psalms of degrees (ascents). Some suppose that each psalm matched one of fifteen steps that the priest would have to ascend into the temple. More likely, the fifteen psalms mirror the gradual ascent into Jerusalem of the returning captives from Babylon. 120:5 Meshec (Heb. Meshek ) was the northernmost territory that Nebuchadnezzar conquered. Today, the region is around Arrmenia and southern Russia. In fact, Moscow derives its name from Meshec; as Tobolski does from Tubal. (See Eze 39:1). Incidentally, the word Chief (head) in Hebrew is rosh. The Scythian chiefs of this region were called Rhos after which the region Russia was derived.Kedar, in Northwest Arabia, was the southern opposite to Mesech. It was smitten by Nebuchadnezzar (Jer 49:28,29). Nebuchadnezzar would have placed Jewish captives throughout his territory, which is reflected in the psalmist’s lament of v.5. 121:5,6 The Babylonian captives humbled themselves and cried out to Yahweh for help, and He responded. Contrast this with the object lesson Yahweh gave rebellious Jonah (Jon 4:6-10). 122:2 Imagine that for seventy years the Jewish captives in Babylon had not seen Jerusalem. What they had longed for would shortly come to pass. 123:3 The Jewish captives were treated contemptuously in Babylon by their masters. They appealed to Yahweh for deliverance. 124:7,8 It was only by Yahweh’s mercy that the Jewish captives were preserved. Recognition of Israel’s God ,Yahweh, as the creator of all things and the preserver of life, is always appropriate to voice. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
121:4 That God does not ‘slumber nor sleep’ in his care for Israel echoes the idea found here - Deut 11:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
7 - We need to remember that Jesus went through this for us. He had to suffer
like us so that he was able to be a perfect atonement - the we should be at one
with God through his work. He gave up the opportunity to worship the devil - to
follow his own desires - that he might fulfil God's purpose for the world. It
was the most unselfish of acts anyone has ever committed or will ever commit.
Consequently he became the object of others' worship and ultimately every knee
shall bow to him. Lu.8:28,
17:16, Ps.72:11, Rev.4:10 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
3 In
the temptations of Jesus in the wilderness twice the statement 'if thou be the
son of God' is seen.Jesus withstood the temptations and 'the devil departed for
a season' [Luke
4:13]. As if to remind
us that Jesus continued to battle with temptation twice when he was on the cross
he is taunted 'if thou be ...' [Luke
22:42 23:37]. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:6
The 'devil' is presented as offering all the kingdoms of the world if Jesus were
to bow down. Maybe Jesus was able to rebut this temptation by his knowledge of
what his Father had promised him 'Ask of me and I will give thee the heathen for
thine inheritance' (Psalm
2:8) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:40
When it is recorded 'the sun was setting' we should realises that this was at
the end of the sabbath (Mark
1:29-30) At this time in Jesus' ministry the people seemed to avoid seeking
Jesus' healing powers on the Sabbath -even though he had healed earlier in the
day. They would be reproved a little later for seeking Jesus' healing powers on
the sabbath Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In Christ's testing in the wilderness we have many lessons. We must avoid temptation if possible. We must use thought substitution; replace negative with positive. Each time Christ was was tempted He quoted from the Old Testament. (V.4,8,12) We need temptations to be tried, to be made a better person(2Tim 2:21) We must sacrifice the flesh to follow Christ.(Matt 16:24) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 4:6 When the 'devil' offered Jesus the kingdoms of the world Jesus only needed to ask his Father and he would be given them anyway 4:6Psalm 2:8). Jesus was willing to wait for his Father's good pleasure rather than take the kingdoms there and then. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 4:6 When the 'devil' offered Jesus the kingdoms of the world Jesus only needed to ask his Father and he would be given them anyway (Psa 2:8). Jesus was willing to wait for his Father's good pleasure rather than take the kingdoms there and then. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.25-27 To the woman of Zarephath....to Nanman the Syrian. God's love is world wide embracing. It is not limited to a single nationality, sex, age ,or where one stands socially. "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond or free, neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." Gal 3:28 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| We have in this chapter a clear example of the most positive kind, that is, the record of Jesus, how he overcame his temptation, not simply by avoiding failure, but by presenting the positive action he followed. we are not unmindful of Paul's exhortation. "Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ." 1Cor 11:1 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
4:4 The quotation from Deut 8:3 is from an area of Scripture where Israel were being reminded that the wilderness journey and their hunger was to 'prove' them (Deut 8:2) Jesus was learning about himself whilst he was in the wilderness those 40 days. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The temptation of Jesus was a testing experience. Would He prove to be true to His Father's will or give in to His own? He suffered forty days without food. This prohibition of food would make anyone weak and susceptible to persuasion. But He rose to the occasion and overcame self by being obedient to His Father's will. This was a learning experience for Him, for we are told that: Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered (Heb 5:8). His example is for us to follow. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
In this chapter we seem to be given the reason that Jesus moves his home base from Nazareth to Capernaum ie the unbelief of Nazareth. cp v 22, & 31 Re demons - it is interesting to note that the language of Jesus is the same when he speaks/casts out the unclean spirit v 35 as when he speaks to the fever v 39 In those days people didn't understand about bacteria/viruses (real unseen entities) or mental illnesses (abnormal functioning of the nervous system), in the same way we do.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
| The Lord Jesus saved His life outside Nazareth. He knew that He had to die by crucifixion – a terribly slow and painful death. But here was a chance of a horrible, but very quick death. The dear Lord passed through the midst of them, and went His way. In John 8:59 the Jews were going to stone Him, but “He hid Himself”. Then in John 10:31 they again took up stones to kill Him, but on this occasion He reasoned with them. Then finally in John 10:39 He again “escaped out of their hand.” That makes 4 times when Jesus “saved” His life so that He could finish the work God had given Him to do (see John 17:4). The 5th time when they came to take Him He offered Himself to them (John 18:4-9). This was the time for which he had “saved Himself”. 5 is generally thought of as the number of grace. Jesus therefore died for us, by grace, on the 5th occasion. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
||||||||||
4:5 Jesus calls upon his disciples – Luke 9:25 – to resist the sae temptation as he experiences here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
4:2 That Jesus ‘hungered’ ties Jesus’ wilderness experience with that of Israel on the way from Egypt – Deut 8:3 Hence the use of the language of that chapter is not surprising during the trials of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
It is clear from this chapter that the Old Testament writings impacted Jesus and His work. Jesus used the words of Deuteronomy as a defence during His temptation (vs.4,8,12). He explained Isa 61:1,2 as applying to Himself in vs.18,19. He referred to Elijah’s and Elisha’s dealings from 1 and 2 Kings in vs.25-27. All these examples show the importance of understanding the Old Testament in order to understand the Gospel (The things concerning the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 8:12)). Jesus showed factual evidence from the scriptures concerning events from the days of Elijah and Elisha (vs.25-27). However, His presentation was met with hostility (vs.28,29). We should not expect that our presentations regarding the Truth should be met with anything less. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:13 ‘for a season’ indicates that Jesus continued to be tempted. Shortly – Luke 4:29 - a similar temptation to that of throwing himself down from the pinnacle of the temple arose. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
After forty days of fasting, Jesus would have been exhausted both mentally and physically. His temptation was an internal dialog. Notice that Jesus’ only defence against His temptations were scriptural refutations (Deuteronomy). The sword of the spirit should be the weapon that we use, also (Eph 6:17). V.19 The acceptable year of the Lord is a reference to the Year of Jubilee when release was given to all persons and property (Lev 25:10). Vs.27,28 nobody could refute the scriptural evidence here. But the crowd was furious over the (perceived) intimation that Gentiles were to be preferred over Jews. This unhelpful attitude would find its way in the early ecclesia were Judaizers would promote the premier place of Jews and insist on keeping some of their customs, like circumcision. V.38 Peter (the first pope according to Catholics) was married. What’s wrong with this picture? V.43 Jesus preached the kingdom of God which is a cornerstone of the Gospel. The kingdom of God will be a real kingdom on earth. Jesus will be the king and rule the whole earth, when he returns. How come the churches of Christendom don’t preach this? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
4:38-39 We saw in Luke 4:40 that the people came to Jesus to be healed at the end of the sabbath but he healed Peter’s mother in law on the sabbath, after he went ‘home’ from the synagogue. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
BREAD AND FELLOWSHIP One of the important things we need to do as believers in the Lord is to have fellowship together. In order to keep strengthening our faith we need the encouragement we can gain from having strong friendships with people who are like minded. One of the ways we do that is to get together with each other and socialise, and very often, more often than not, it happens around a meal. In my part of the world, eating together is a very important part of fellowship. It is a time when we can relax in each others company, get to know one another and build relationships with each other. As Jesus was being tempted to make stones into bread when he was hungry after fasting for forty days, his answer to the temptation was, "Man does not live in bread alone." (Luke 4:4) We need more than food to survive. Sure, food will keep us alive for now, but to really live and to live eternally, we need the word of God. So when we get together for fellowship and to share a meal, we need to do more than to eat and socialise. Matthew adds "Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God." (Matt 4:4) When we get together to share a meal, far more importantly we should also share the word of God with our fellow believers. Bread alone will do nothing, but sharing the word of God will share life. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Robert |
||||||||||