|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.7,
8 - Here we have the memorial bread, associated, not for the first time [ch.2:2]
with frankincense - the symbol of Jesus' priesthood - our high priest for ever
after the order of Melchizedek. We also see the idea of continual remembrance
every Sabbath and its association with an everlasting covenant. So many passages
spring to mind. Here are just two. John
6:35,51, Heb.6:20, 7:25-28 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Notice the repetition
of 'pure' 24:2 pure olive oil Leviticus 24:4 pure candlestick Leviticus 24:6 pure table Leviticus 24:7 pure frankincense The oil is for light and the shewbread, typically at least, is for food for those who minister in the tabernacle. Both of these provisions were for the priests who ministered. Yahweh did not deed the light - he dwells in light unapproachable whereas the priest dwelt in 'darkness' which was only lightened by God's law. So purity and holiness are being stressed in worship and service. 24:3 This is the fifth time that the phrase 'a statute for ever' has occurred 23:14 23:21 23:31 23:41 24:3 24:10 - 11 This event seems to be out of place and unrelated to the details given above but it is not. It shows an example of how purity and holiness were not manifest in Israel. The son was born of two 'unequally yoked'. He blasphemed God having striven with one of God's sons. The tension between the origins of the two men is seen in 24:10. 24:12 That they 'put in him ward' stresses that the law did not have an immediate answer to the problem - by contrast to the freedom we have in Christ. Having been 'made free from the law of sin and death' we are governed by principles which answer every aspect of life. Therefore we see that even the purity and holiness of the Law of Moses could not address every problem of life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.19,20
- Familiar words because of the way Jesus quotes them in Matt.5:38
in showing the more excellent way based on love, but do we apply these spiritually?
Jesus does - Matt.7:2. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :2
The command to bring the oil for the lamps matches the request [Exodus
27:20] for the oil which provided the material for the making of the oil which
is recorded in Exodus 39. So we might conclude that Leviticus 24 records what
was spoken in Exodus 27, and therefore was spoken before Exodus 39. If this is
so it is possible to date sections of Leviticus very precisely. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :22
That the stranger and the Jew were to live by the same law teaches that God
is not a respecter of persons. Also it teaches that we should not expect of the
non believer behaviour which is better than that which we manifest. Actually,
as we know what God requires, we should expect higher standards of behaviour and
thought of ourselves than of those who do not believe. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 24:10 We do not need to know about the mixed parentage of the son who gathered sticks. However we are told. Maybe the lesson is that mixed marriages – believer and unbeliever – are liable to bring forth children who do not understand the commandments. This is not to say that children from such relationships cannot accept the gospel. However it points up that such unions are not to be recommended. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.5 "Twelve cakes" For the shewbread, as previously appointed Exo 25:30 The cakes were baked by the Levites, the flour being furnished by the people 1Chron 9:32, 1Chron 23:9 The oil, wine , and salt being the other incredients. Lev 2:13 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
It is important to understand the distinction between the words continuous and continual. Continuous means never ending without an interval, whereas continual means never ending but with a break. The lamps were to be burned continually from evening until morning (vs.2-4). Aaron would light the lamps in the evening, and extinguish them in the morning (Exo 30:7,8). This practice would occur each day. The twelve loaves of bread were to be a memorial for Israel (v. 5-8). They would, naturally, become mouldy and so would have to be replaced by new loaves each Sabbath day. This, like the lamps, was a continual service. We are like the shewbread in that we need to be (spiritually) renewed. That is the reason for meeting around the table of the Lord each week, to remember Him who is the incorruptible bread of life. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The commandment to fill the lamps with olive oil, and to bake the holy
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
24:2-6 We see the word ‘pure’ 4 times in these verses. The light of the gospel and the spiritual food we give must be ‘pure’ – that is uncontaminated by man’s reasoning. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
24:2,5 The linking together of the oil for the lamps and the shewbread in this chapter draws together two separate elements from the Exodus record. Exo 27:20speak of the oil and Exo 25:30 speaks of the shewbread. Thus we see these two separate elements of the law of Moses as recorded in Exodus are actually related to each other when it comes the service of the tabernacle. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.23 With the stoning or execution of the son of Shelomith for blasheming the name of the LORD (24:11) we see stoning one to death become the established punishment in all cases for blasphemy, it illustrates the fate of Stephen (Acts 7:58-59), who suffered under a false charge of speaking blasphemous words against both Moses and God (Acts 6:11-14). John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
Vs.10,11: the man who blasphemed was a member of the mixed multitude that came out of Egypt (Exo 12:38). Yahweh showed early that He would allow Gentiles to participate in the Hope of Israel. The fact that this Gentile abused the privilege is not significant in itself. Undoubtedly, there were other mixed multitude members who cherished the opportunity. On the other hand, we know that there were Israelites who rebelled, such as Korah, Dathan, and Abiram. The lesson is that regardless of being either a Jew or a Gentile, one is personally responsible to the Laws of God (Eze 18:20). The same applies to those under Christ (Gal 3:28; 2Cor 5:10). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
24:15 Here is an example of a case where a specific law is enunciated as a direct consequence of a prior action. The boy cursed God and a law was instituted which became a universal law. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.16 Cursing Yahweh's Name meant death. Job and his family knew this principle. When Job’s situation seemed hopeless, his wife urged him to end his life by cursing God (Job 2:9). Vs.19,20 This does not mean, literally, that body parts must be taken for ones lost. The law is one of equitable compensation. That is, there must be reparation to the value of whatever was lost. That is clear from v.18. However, if a man kills another man, then the killer must pay with his own life (v.21). Later, in the land, a distinction would be made between murder and accidental death (Num 35:15). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The penalty given here for blasphemy seems very harsh. But this incident has more to it than we initially suspect. Checking "blasphemy" in a concordance we see this is the very first occurrence of it in the bible. So the first thing to note is that this didn't happen often. This is backed up by v12 - the judges didn't know what to do because this was the first case of its kind in the nation of Israel. Following the other occurrences this word, we find it's used to describe someone who openly challenges the God of Israel's ability to save His people. One noteworthy example is Assyria who sent an army to taunt the God of Israel (Isa 36:2,4,19,20). This is described as blasphemy by God (2Kin 19:20-22) and culminated in Him destroying their whole army. Likewise Goliath's taunts defied God and culminated in the destruction of his army. So it was the same with this man in our chapter. He fought with a man of Israel (v10) and in the process apparently cursed God and called into question His ability to save. Perhaps he had beaten his opponent and taunted him with "where is your Almighty God now? He couldn't even save you from me!" Such an attitude was an open and deep rooted contempt for God, and undermined the fragile society God was nurturing. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
24:10 When Israel were in Egypt they were slaves. It might seem strange that the Egyptian married her whilst in Egypt but this must be so even though there was a mixed multitude – Exo 12:38- which would include Egyptians that came out of Egypt with Israel. As the child was old enough to blaspheme and Israel had been in the wilderness for less than three years he must have been born in Egypt. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
What's in a name? A name certainly identifies a particular person. But, in Yahweh's case, His Name is the memorial Name of Israel's God. It carries with it present and future components of His will and character. The Name should only be said in recognition of its meaning, and in reverence and fear. There is no need to avoid saying His Name, if those factors are present. Indeed it is a privilege. The Jews have clammed up and to this day refuse to speak His Name. This is false reverence, as their actions largely do not constitute a faithful following. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Verses 1-4 The golden lampstand (Exo 25:31-40) with its seven lamps was to be kept burning continually in the tabernacle, and was to be replenished with fuel consisting of pure oil from beaten olives (2), as prescribed in Exo 27:20-21. The lampstand was put in the holy place, which otherwise would have been completely dark. It was the high priest's daily responsibility to attend to the filling and trimming of the lamps (4), since he was the first person to light it (Num 8:3). In Exo 27:21, however, it is made clear that the duties were to be shared with other members of the priesthood, since the ritual was to extend over many generations. Some interpreters following the vision of Zechariah 4, have seen the lampstand as typical of Israel, which in God's purpose was meant to be a light to the ancient Near Eastern nations. But the true light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to His people Israel, was the Lord Jesus Christ (Luke 2:32). The Christadelphian is bidden to let the light of Christ's salvation shine in daily life, to the glory of God the Father (Matt 5:16, Eph 5:8, Phil 2:15). Carl Hinton [Bedford (United Kingdom)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Carl |
||||||||||
| Lev 24:2-4 - The lampstand was in the Holy Place and making of the lampstand is recorded in Exo 25:31-40. Many believe 7 is the number of spiritual perfection and perhaps it is connected to the millenial sabbath day of rest when Christ returns. We must walk in God's light. God's word is a lamp unto believer's feet and a light unto their path Psa 119:105; only in God's Word can we learn about Him and His purpose with the world, centered in the Lord Jesus Christ John 8:12. Perhaps there is a connection in Revelation also (Rev 1:12-20). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
24:17-21 These laws follow on directly from the law that one who curses God must be killed. Thus we see that whilst Israel were commanded to kill in certain circumstances that should not be taken as licence to kill whenever they wished. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Ps.132 is a wonderful
Psalm.
v. 4,5 tell us of David's
attitude - that which made him a man after God's own heart, though the
'habitation for the mighty God of Jacob' ultimately was to be his descendant,
Jesus, and through Jesus, us - that we might be part of that spiritual temple
created on the chief corner stone - clothed with righteousness and joy [v.9].
And so we come to v.13,
which effectively is the culmination, as far as the psalms are concerned of all
the points we have looked at regarding Zion. Here we have the perfected Christ
and his saints - the body of believers - all represented by this single word -
and here God has decided to dwell. Ps.48:1-3,
68:16, 76:2, 78:68,69, 87:2, Isa.14:32, Heb.12:22. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Psalm 131 David provides a powerful warning about trying to understand things beyond what is revealed. It is so easy to speculate or worry about things which we are not told. So many of the arguments we have can stem from speculation, using non Biblical language, about things we are not told. David says that the 'weaned child' mentality that he had should be ours. Psalm 132 This Psalm shows that David was thinking about the resting place for the Ark whilst he was a shepherd boy in Bethlehem. 'Ephratah' (v6) is Bethlehem (Micah 5:2). David left Bethlehem around the time he killed Goliath - as a young man. So we see that David's desire to put the ark in Zion was not something that he thought of when he was king. Rather it was the driving force in all his life. - Maybe this is why he is called 'a man after [God's] own heart' (Acts 13:22) Psalm 133 In likening the anointing of Aaron to unity the Psalmist is showing that there is more than simply ritual in the deals of the law of Moses. Maybe we should look for other indications of the importance of fellowship in the Law of Moses? Psalm 134 A call to the priests to think about the majesty of God. It must have been so easy just to view working in the temple as just another job. The call to think about the majesty of God was necessary to correct the balance. Likewise we have to realise that whilst we routinely go to the meeting that we are involving ourselves in very important matters. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 133
v.3 - Compare this with Jesus words in John
4:14. Here we have living water provided for those who are in Zion - in Christ. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 131:2
If we view ourselves as mature, no longer babes, we will desire the 'meat' Hebrews
5:14. Indeed if we think that we still need the milk we have to view ourselves
as 'unskilful' [Hebrews
5:13] and immature. So seeing ourselves as needing milk is not a sign of humility.
If we need milk we are immature.
Psalm 132 - In linking bringing the ark to Zion and :11 the promise of the one who would sit upon God's throne David shows us that we should see a relationship between the bringing of the ark to Zion and the promises of 2 Samuel 7. 133:1 Unity is such an important issue that it forms the first thing that Paul speaks of when describing a living sacrifice [Romans 12] and amongst all the problems the Corinthian ecclesia had it was the first thing he addressed - 1 Corinthians 3. 134:3 The Lord who had created the universe is quite capable of providing blessings to His servants. A certain belief in creation provides the confidence to believe that God will work in our lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
131:1-2 Even though the Psalmist sees himself as mature he does not elevate himself in his own eyes. 132:6 In saying that he heard about the ark at Ephratah - Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) the Psalmist shows that David was thinking that the ark should be in Zion even when he was a shepherd boy in Bethlehem - before he was anointed king or had killed Goliath. 133:1 In likening unity to the anointing of the high priest we see the way in which true unity will come - through the work of our high priest, Jesus Christ. 134:2 'lifting up hands' is a recurring theme with respect to prayer (Psalm 28:2 63:4 141:2 1Timothy 2:8) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
131:3 Hoping in the Lord is to be contrasted with thinking highly of oneself. :1 ‘my heart is not haughty’ demonstrates this. 132:2 The ‘mighty God of Jacob’ is the God of the blessings (Gen 49:24) 133:3 There is debate as to where the judgement will be – Sinai or Jerusalem. However we should think on a broader basis than this. How is the blessing of ‘life for evermore’ achieved in Zion? Is it not through the birth of a man in Zion Psa 87:6 – and this is not to say that Jerusalem is the place of judgement. It is the association with the things of Zion that bring that blessing. 134:3 In speaking of blessing out of Zion the Psalmist is echoing the ideas of Psalm 133 which has fellowship as the basis for the blessing being given. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Psalm 133 This is another one of those Psalms which Hezekiah used as an appropriate expression of his own experiences and circumstances. Here we have the blessing of a truly united ecclesia outlined. As well, we see David's trust that God will bless him with life evermore in the Kingdom Age. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
What a strange phrase there is in Psa 134:1! "Behold, bless ye the LORD, all ye servants of the LORD, which by night stand in the house of the LORD". What does it mean? Who would go into the house of the Lord at night? There was only one function that could be performed in the temple at night, but we don't find it stipulated in the Law. We find it in the words of Solomon (1Kin 8:29, 2Chron 6:20), and Nehemiah (Neh 1:6). The only thing that could be done in the house of the LORD at night (whilst the doors were shut and guarded) was prayer! So the Psalmist is saying that by prayer to God, we may stand in His house, wherever we are. It is those who pray by (or on) their beds that are described as being in the sanctuary v2. This is significant for us who have no earthly temple to go to. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 132:1-5 This vow is not elsewhere recorded. It expresses, in strong language, David's intense desire to see the establishment of God's worship, as well as of his kingdom. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Unity among Brothers and Sisters binds us together. SeePsa 133. Just like the holy anointing oil which joined Aaron’s head to his feet. It flowed down the whole body. And unity amongst us is also like the dew. The same dew fell on Mt Hermon in the north, and on Mt Zion in the south. Let’s pray for spirutal unity within our Brotherhood. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
132:8 This Psalm speaks of David’s desire to bring the ark to
133:2 Wee should note that the word ‘skirts’ <06310> when speaking of Aaron’s garment could equally be translated ‘hole’ as in the collar. We need not think of Aaron being soaked in anointing oil when he was anointed. Here is a place where it is translated hole Exo 39:23 And there was an hole <06310> in the midst of the robe, as the hole <06310> of an habergeon, with a band round about the hole <06310>, that it should not rend.
134:1 So it appears that those who kept watch in the temple at night had a job to do. We might have thought that there would be no people coming into the temple at night so the night porters would have nothing to do. The Psalmist tells them that they should use their time to praise God. How often do we think to praise God or pray to Him at times in our lives when we have nothing to do? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| These four Psalms convey the desire to be in the presence of God, and the joy and satisfaction experienced when the desire is fulfilled. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 132:4-18 - David was unhappy as the tabernacle was divided in two different places with the ark temporarily captured, rejected, and returned to Keriath-jearim "the city of the woods" while the altar with the main part of the tabernacle was in Gibeon. In v5 David wanted to find a home or "place" Heb."maqom" (4725) for God's house. There are often different levels of interpreting scripture. The capture of the ark perhaps reminds us of how Christ's mortal body was temporarily captured and crucified outside Jerusalem by sinful people who rejected him only to have him resurrected with a unified nature and body in God's house and who will soon rule the earth from Zion in a millenial rest. In v5 "habitation" Heb. "mishkan" (4908) means "tabernacle, grave, residence, the temple, dwelling (place), habitation, tent", etc. while the "habitation" in v13 perhaps refers more to the future kingdom and uses Heb. "mowshab" (4186) meaning "a seat, a site, an abode, population, asembly, inhabited place, dwelling", etc. We have the mention in vss 8,14 of "rest" using the same Heb. word "menuwchah" (4496) meaning "repose, peacefully, consolation (specifically as in matrimoney), abode, comfortable, ease, quiet, rest", etc. so perhaps this points to the millenial day of rest when Christ is united with his bride, also at the end of v8 we have the word "arise" which could refer to a resurrection. In vss 9,16 we read of priests and kings which reminds us of a millenial age (Rev 5:10; 19:8). In v10-11 we have mention of David's anointed who will be set on his throne and this likely encompasses a millenial application. Vss 13-14 we have the mention of Zion as the rest forever. Vss 17-18 we have the "horn" (according the NIV this symbolizes strong one or king) of David who will bud and that a lamp has been ordained for God's annointed (Christ?) whose enemies will be clothed with shame (the day of judgement for those whose who rejected Christ?). V18 ending with his crown to flourish. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
Psalm 131: Some think that this psalm is an account of David’s vindicating himself. But others believe that the ascent psalms are about the captives. In that case, then, this psalm would be an account of how the captives comported themselves under the bonds of their captivity. Psalm 132: Some have attributed this psalm to either David, Solomon, or to one of the captives at the end of the captivity. If you are following the captive theme, the second temple, and the ark, is referenced (v.8). Psalm 133: Following the rebuilt dwelling place of Yahweh in Psalm 132, the priests will be united in temple service. Psalm 134: This is the last of the ascent psalms. It urges the priests to praise Yahweh in the temple. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The psalmist's humility and mind & spirit The psalmist aim in life was to be humble, regardless of the situation that was alloted to him. The love of God which was reigning in the heart, subdued the self-love which can easily overtake us. The psalmist was well reconciled to every condition the Lord placed him in. As a child is at the disposal of his mother's arms, we must become as little children as well (in the arms of God) Matt 18:3 Let us quietly wait for the salvation of the Lord under every condition & trial of life
Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Psa 134:1 we have just read in the Lev readings about a job for the priest at night Lev 24:3 the tendings of the lamps. The tending of the lights iin the darkness of the night would lead them to contemplation of the majesty of God and cause them to praise Him Psa 134:3 Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
132:9 The Psalmist’s desire that the priest would be clothed with salvation is an idea taken up by Isa 61:10– speaking of those who will inherit the kingdom through the death and resurrection of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
132:4 David’s sentiments regarding finding a place for the ark are presented by Solomon - Prov 6:4–as a more general instruction to the ‘son’ about his life before God. So whilst we are not seeking a place for the ark as David was we must still have the same degree of enthusiasm for God’s wisdom which enlightens the ‘son’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Unity among brethren is precious in the sight of Yahweh (Psa 133 ). Paul emphasizes this among brethren who constitute the body of Christ (Eph 4:3-6). Jesus hates any disunity of His body (ecclesia), and will not take too kindly at the judgement to those who have caused divisions. That is the reason for Paul's appeal (Rom 16:17; 1Cor 1:10). Jesus loves those who are peacemakers (Matt 5:9). And so, let us do everything we can to promote unity within His body.Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
UNITE There is something special about unity that goes well beyond the scope of just agreeing with each other. The two illustrations the Psalmist gives us about unity give us some fascinating insights. "It is like precious oil poured on the head, running down the beard, running down on Aaron's beard, down upon the collar of his robes." (Psa 133:2) As well as being good and pleasant, unity is a priestly action. A lot of different examples could have been used to describe unity, yet it was the annointing oil on the high priest that was chosen. It was the symbol of God's blessing on his chief servant that teaches us of unity. When we make the effort to live in unity with each other, God looks on us as he looked on his high priest in the Tabernacle. The other illustration is that unity "is as if the dew of Hermon were falling on Mount Zion." (v.3) Then the psalmist adds, "For there the LORD bestows his blessing, even life for ever more." (v.3) In God's sight our unity with each other is as refreshing and cleansing as the dew. It is also life giving, just like the dew gives life to God's creation. And just as the dew covers the whole ground, so our unity affects everyone around us. Unity is so important to God that it has his special blessing of life for ever more. God's word should not be a source of contention, but of love and encouragement. As God's people we must make every effort to unite. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
|
132:8 The way that the Psalmist has David speaking is actually echoed by Solomon when he dedicated the temple – 2Chron 6:41 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
134:1 The servants of Yahweh are asked to praise Him. But why is this request made to those who would be in the House of Yahweh at night? The Hebrew word for night used here is layil (the same as layla, which is used in other scriptures and also used in Modern Hebrew). These words mean night in the literal, physical sense, but also mean adversity in the figurative sense (the evil associated with the absence of light). And so, those servants, who are suffering adversity, are in the House of Yahweh praising Him (for His mercy, help and protection). Likewise, we, as servants of Yahweh, also offer our praise as we call upon Him for help with the trials that we suffer. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Psa 132:11 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King This is an everlasting covenant sworn to David, and it did not take place in David's lifetime 2Sam 23:3-5 but there will be a future fulfilment Psa 89:3-4. Psa 132:11 is quoted in the New Testament and applied to Jesus Acts 2:30, Acts 13:22-23. This shows that Jesus will be the future King. For more about the King, go to 2Sam 7:12-16. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
132:17 In speaking of the horn of David budding we see a concept with is taken up in the rest of the Old Testament, for example Jer 23:5, 33:15 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.9
- The level of faith of certain individuals is recorded for us to take note
of. We need to have faith - we need to believe that God will heal our problems
from a distance in the same way that this centurion did - and our problems involve
death too - that which is inevitable for each one of us and would be final, were
it not for faith. Let us then try to develop it and use the example of Israel
as a starting point from which to do better, that we might not suffer the same
punishments as they did, but that we might be grafted into their stock and share
in their promises by our faith. Matt.15:28,
Rom.3:1-3, 9:4,5. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.23
If we wish to think of Jesus as being one who went about bending over backwards
in order to please men we would be mistaken. Matthew
11:6 13:21 57 Mark 6:3 John 6:61 Whilst Jesus knew that what he had to say
would offended many he was concerned that his followers would not be so dismayed.
Matthew
11:6 His concern was
that his Father's will might be known. This is offensive to the flesh - therefore
he prayed that his disciples would not be caused to stumble as did his adversaries.
John
16:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:36-49
Given that the Pharisee knew what sort of woman it was who was washing Jesus'
feet we must question how she had managed to get into the house. The Pharisee
must have seen it as a wonderful unexpected opportunity to trap Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| LOVE AND FORGIVENESS We all owe a debt to God for the wrong we have done. Some of us owe more than others and yet, no matter how many times we have sinned, or how bad our sins have been, or how incurable we think we are, by the love of God we can be forgiven and be saved from sin and death. We need to do as the sinful woman did when she came to Jesus. She wept and anointed him in an action of love and showing in her actions a new beginning. After her encounter with the Lord Jesus he told her that her sins were forgiven and to go in peace. She had shown a great amount of love and had been forgiven for a great amount of sins. Forgiveness breeds love, and love helps us to forgive and be forgiven. The more we forgive, the more loving we will become and the more God will forgive us. If we have been forgiven a lot we will love God more and our anguished, guilty lives will be freed from their pain, and we, like the sinful woman, will be able to go in peace. So let us repent of our sins, show our love for our Lord, forgive each other and enjoy the love, peace and forgiveness that flows from our Lord. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| :2
Not only was the centurion a gentile. He was an important man in the occupying
army. One would, therefore, think that the Jews would have little love for him.
However they describe him as 'worthy' (:4).
From this we must conclude that he was a very special gentile as far as his attitude
t the Jews was. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.11 This is the only time that this village is spoken of in scripture. Christ, it appears only visited the village this one time. It is a little to the south of Mount Tabor, about twenty kilometres from Capernaum. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 7:9 Here is a contrast! Jesus 'marveled' - it was usually the people who marveled at what Jesus did for example (Matt 8:27 , 9:8 , :33) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| John sent his disciples to Jesus with a question, for their sakes not for his (vs.19,20). His disciples had to know that they should now be following Jesus and no longer John. The woman of vs.37,38 should not be confused with Mary (John 12:3). Mary was in the house of her father (see my note on Matt. 26, Jan 24) while this woman was clearly not. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:3 The ‘elders’ ask Jesus to heal the centurion’s servant but the Pharisees object to Jesus healing on the sabbath! There must have been some arguments between the elders of the synagogue and the Pharisees who came from Jerusalem! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v 4,5 where the Jews are impressed with the centurion's works, is contrasted with v 9 where Jesus is amazed by his faith. The lesson for us is obvious, and often emphasised by Paul. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
| There is much debate as to whether John sent his disciples to Jesus for his own benefit or for theirs. I think we do not have to exclude the benefit to John as in v 22 Jesus specifically tells them to go & tell John about what they have seen. Jesus compares John to Elijah, whom we know had crises of faith, but God strengthened him, and he is known as a great prophet. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
| in v 41, Jesus is giving a picture of what is in Simon's mind. Before God there are no big sins and little sins, or big sinners and small sinners, but we all sin & fall short. In his own mind though, Simon saw this differentiation cp Luke 18:10-14. When he goes on to speak of forgiveness in v 47, he doesn't mention Simon's sinfulness, but his lack of forgiveness & love. We cannot be forgiven if we do not admit to our sins & repent, and if we do not repent we have no relationship with God & no love of Him. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
The harlot who came to Jesus obviously hadn’t planned to weep (Luke 7:36-50). No-one plans to cry. She had gone home and picked up her most prized (and possibly her only) possession. She brought the alabaster box with her, obviously intending to give it to Jesus. As she stood at His feet, knowing she was in the presence of the Son of God, and also surrounded by a number of prominent citizens, suddenly her emotions got the better of her, and she started to cry. Her sobs and her tears continued, and she began to realise what was happening. No-one had washed the Master’s feet, and her tear drops were leaving terrible streaks down His dusty feet. She had to do something, quick. Grabbing her long hair, she used that as a towel, and dried His poor dirty feet. (This would have made her hair really matted and unpleasant, but that didn't mmater to her.) She then kissed His feet in a real act of worship. And then an idea struck her. She broke the expensive box to release the perfumed ointment, pouring it over His tired feet. It was the best present she could give to this wonderful Man. And He gave her a present, too. He forgave her sins, which were many.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to David |
||||||||||
7:35 In saying ‘wisdom is justified of her children’ Jesus is saying that the works of a man show what he is really like. The ‘wise’ – Jesus and John showed their wisdom by their actions. The Jewish leders showed their foolishness by their actions. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
John's question to Jesus in v.19 was for the benefit of his (John's) disciples. John clearly knew his mission and remained steadfast to his calling. His faith never waned - a fact that was attested by Jesus Himself (vs. 24-28). John had explained to his disciples that his role was that of the friend of the bridegroom - Christ being the bridegroom (John 3:25-36). In the Near East, the friend of the bridegroom was the person responsible for all the preparations for the wedding. Once wedding day arrived, then the bridegroom took over while the friend faded into the background. Although John had explained his relationship vis-à-vis Jesus to his disciples, he needed the Master to confirm the situation to them so that they should be in no doubt of whom to follow. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:2 This is the essence of the gospel. The servant answers to Israel – spiritually dead. The centurion is the caring master. Whilst he could replace this servant he loved that servant and so wanted to save him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:8 In comparing himself to Jesus saying ‘I also under authority’ he is recognising that just as his authority came from his appointment by Rome Jesus did not act on his own authority but was working at the sanction of a higher authority. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.11-15 Jesus went to Nain and raised the dead son of the widow. The report of the incident is plain, and shows the power of Yahweh. But, is there any deeper significance? The meaning of the name Nain is green pastures. Right away, an echo of Ps. 23 is triggered. David's psalm talks about himself, but also talks about Jesus. The psalm talks about Jesus' suffering and death. He had to: walk through the valley of the shadow of death. But, He would be brought back to life to: lie down in green pastures. This is an image of lushness - green being the eternal color. Jesus would obtain (and has now obtained) eternal life. His true followers will also obtain eternal life. These people are represented by the complete (full circle) rainbow (emerald is green, the eternal color) (Rev 4:3). The raised man in Nain was the only son of the widow. He was the sole breadwinner in that family. Without her son, the widow would be left destitute. Jesus is the head of His family. If He were not raised from the dead, His spiritual family would be left destitute - they would have no hope of eternal life (1Cor 15:14). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:21 In quoting Mal 3:1 Jesus gives us the authority to see John’s ministry in the prophecy of Malachi. Now Malachi’s message is directed to ‘the priests’ – Mal 2:1 etc: - John was not just telling people that Jesus was coming He witnessed against the religious authorities right from the beginning of his work – Matt 3:7 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||