April 12

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Numbers  31
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Numbers 31 online in the King James Version
Listen to Numbers 31 online in the New International Version

 

v. 8 - This was an amazing victory - to go with just 12000 men and slay all the males of this nation that was big enough to support 5 kings (elsewhere called princes). Also we are told that Balaam was slain there. One of the women folk associated with one of these princes had been killed earlier - ch.25:15-18.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 11 - 16 Whereas the taking of the women captives was an allowable behaviour in this case there was an overriding principle relating to causing to sin. These women had been involved in the fall of many in Israel. Normally the women would not be involved in the battle and so would have been guiltless in this case the women were as culpable as the men. Therefore all the women who had known a man - precisely those who were culpable - were to die. That Moses was angry would imply that the people should have understand that as well.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.23 - Consider these other places where fire (and sometimes water as well) are mentioned - Isa.43:2, Zech.13:9, Matt.3:11, 1Cor.3:13, 1Pet.1:7, 4:12, Rev.3:18
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
31:2 Moses was to avenge the Midianites because of the matters relating to Balaam.

31:8 'Zur' was the father of the woman slain by Phinehas.(25:15)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
SPIRITUAL BATTLES

12,000 men of Israel marched out in battle to take vengeance on the Midianites. "Moses sent them into battle, a thousand from each tribe, along with Phineas son of Eleazar, the priest, who took with him articles from the sanctuary and the trumpets for signaling." At the end of the day Israel came back victorious, not having lost one man in the battles they had fought.

This was not a battle between men, but it was God's battle and God cannot loose. We are left wondering, though, what articles from the sanctuary that Phineas took into battle with him. It may have been the ark, incense or censors. Perhaps it was the water of cleansing or the Urim and the Thummim, but whatever he took, the fact that he took articles from the sanctuary leaves us in no doubt that it was not a physical battle they were to fight, but a spiritual battle, and because they treated it as a spiritual battle - God's battle, they won decisively!

We all face battles. They may be decisions we need to make, problems we face, people we have to deal with or a multitude of other things, but as we face these battles we need to take with us articles from the sanctuary. For us they are prayer, the word of the Living God within us, and faith. Make every battle a spiritual battle and we can't loose!

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
31:15 In sparing the women it would appear that even the officers of the people had forgotten the way in which Israel were caused to sin by these very same women at the instigation of Balaam. Their memories were short and they did not think through the implications of their actions. So like us at times.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
31:13-15 Sparing people in battle - a problem here - was also seen in Saul 1Sam 15:9 who spared Agag.  Obeying the word of God precisely rather than allowing human feelings to get in the way is difficult. We are no different.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.6  Although it is not expressly mentioned, it is possible that Joshua was the general who conducted this war. The presence of a priest, who was always with the army, (Deut 20:2) was necessary to preside over the Levites, who accompanied the expedition, to encourage the Israelites, with their services.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

Before Moses died, God asked him to organise the battle against the Midianites. This was probably a very hard thing for Moses, because he had married Zipporah, the daughter of the priest of Midian.   He had also lived in their land for 40 years.  But Midian was a descendant of Abraham's wife Keturah (Gen 25:2), and therefore would never be a part of God's blessing on Israel.  Moses did not go to the battle,
but stayed in the camp with Eleazar the priest.


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

31         That the husband can disannul the vow of the wife means that we cannot make promises which are contrary to the will of the Father – our ‘husband’ requires that we obey God. This, of course, means that we should know what our Father and His son will approve just as a  wife in Israel would not willingly make a vow against the wishes of her husband.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

V.32-47 The total amount of bounty remaining from the Midianites was in the following portions.
PRAY
SHEEP
BEEVES
ASSES
PEOPLE
Total amount
675,000
72,000
61,000
32,000
Half to soldiers
337,500
36,000
30,500
16,000
To God
675
72
61
32
Half to Congregation
337,500
36,000
30,500
16,000
To Levites
6,750
720
610
320


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
V.23-24 - looking at these verses in a spiritual sense ... after battling sin, being purified by trials, and being buried (in Christ and perhaps literally) believers look forward to that 7th day of rest or millenium (2Pet 3:8-9) when Christ will return, there will be a resurrection, judgment, and wearing clothes of righteousness (Rev 3:4-5) those chosen will be allowed to enter into Christ's kingdom.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

31:2 Knowing that he would die after the avenging of Israel of the Midianites a lesser man than Moses may well have delayed the task to prolong their life. Not so Moses, the man of God. Are we quick to do God’s will whatever the cost?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
V.13 Moses and Eleazar would have gone forth without the camp to congratulate the warriors, another reason for going without the camp would have been to avoid the defilement of the camp by the warriors, who would have been stained with blood.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

31:19  The battle was at God’s instruction so it was inevitable that there would be people who had killed Midianites. So why were they still deemed ceremonially unclean? The reason is that even though the battle was of God the children of Israel had to suffer the consequences of their actions. The command from God to kill did not remove from Israel the requirements of obeying the requirements of the law.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

The Midianites originated from Abraham and Keturah (Gen 25:2). They are sometimes called Ishamaelites such as the group that took Joseph to Egypt (Gen 37:28). The Midianites and the Ishmaelites were, of course, related, Abraham/Keturah = Midian; Abraham/Hagar = Ishmael. The Ishmaelites were bigger and more powerful than the Midianites, and so, at some point, the Midianites, plus some other smaller groups, were associated with the Ishmaelites .

It is somewhat ironic that when Moses fled for his life from Egypt that he went to Midian. He married the daughter of Jethro, the priest of Midian. It must be noted, though, that Jethro and a certain smaller segment of the Midianites, called Kenites, worshipped the God of Israel. In fact, Jethro’s progeny were among those who entered the Promised Land (Judg 4:11).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

31:4 In calling for 1,000 from each of the tribes Israel did not use its whole army against Midian. Only a small proportion of the men of war were used. This was to show that the victory was God’s, not Israel’s.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.2 The Midianites were the ones responsible for their snaring of Israel in the matter of Baal-peor (Num 25:17,18). Now was the time for revenge.

V.8 After leaving Balak, Balaam should have returned straight home to Mesopotamia. Instead he stopped off to visit the Midianites, perhaps to further meddle in the affairs of Israel. His sojourn with the Midianites cost him his life.

Vs.14,15 No specific order for the annihilation of women was made. But, because of the contemptuous behavior of the Cozbi, in particular, there was an expectation that all the Midianites would be slain. Moses judgment was to allow female virgins only to be kept alive (v.18).

V.19 is in compliance with the Law (Num 19:11,12).

V.35 There were 32,000 Midianite females who were virgins. 16,000 of these were given to the soldiers, and 16,000 were given to the congregation (vs.27,46). From the soldiers portion, 32 were given as a heave offering to Eliezer (vs.28,29). The heave offering consisted of lifting up the offering once only. This signified a dedication to Yahweh. The animals would be sacrificed but the women not. It is not clear what form of dedication these females would have had during their lifetime. Perhaps, they would have had to remain virgins, like Jephthah’s daughter who had to remain a virgin because of her father’s vow (Judg 11:38).

From the Congregation’s 16,000 Midianite females, 320 were given to the Levites (v.30).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
Num 31:19 - Perhaps this echos the purification for believers as a result of Christ's sacrifice and resurrection on the 3rd day and the more complete purification on the 7th millenial day.  
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

31:6 Phinehas stayed the plague which was a consequence of the Midianite corruption. Now he leads the battle against Midian, not as a man of war but as priest of God. Marking the point that it was a religious battle in that it was a consequence of immoral behaviour


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Proverbs 22
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Proverbs 22 online in the King James Version
Listen to Proverbs 22 online in the New International Version

 

v. 6 - Here is a passage that the world would have us ignore. We are buffetted on all sides with worldly advice on bringing up our children and many are confused by the conflict that exists between different pieces of advice. We have a responsibility to be in control of our children. It is a requirement of God. So it would be useful to consider carefully what God has to say to us about it. Here are some passages: Gen.18:19, Deut.4:9, 6:7, Ps.78:3-6, Eph.6:4, 2Tim.3:15, 1Tim.3:2-4.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 28 The removal of the landmark was a serious offence mentioned to Israel in the wilderness. Deuteronomy 19:14 Included in the blessing and cursing which were to be recited by the people. Deuteronomy 27:17 Referred to and warned against in terms of robbing the disadvantaged Proverbs 22:28 23:10
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.13 - There is a striking similarity between this cry and that of the ten spies who brought back the evil report. Num.13:32-33. See also - Prov.26:13-16
Peter Cresswell
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:3 teaches us that we should try to look ahead at the implications of what we do and say so that we can avoid words and actions that will in time cause us problems and compromise our life in Christ.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
BE GENEROUS

"A generous man will himself be blessed, for he shares his food with the poor." (Proverbs 22 v 9)
God always does things differently to the way we do them. We tend to think that if we want to be rich we must skimp and save, never give anything away and watch every last penny. But God’s methods are different. He wants more from us than selfishness. God wants our generosity, he wants to develop in us a sharing and caring nature, one that thinks less of its self than of other people.

The people God wants to bless are not the scrooges of this world, they are the generous, helpful, and those who fill a need when they see it. It does not necessarily mean that if we give everything away God will make us instantly rich. He hasn’t promised riches – he has promised a blessing. He has said that he will provide for our needs and that if we give "it will be given to you. Good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." (Luke 6 v 38)

So let’s be generous and give to those in need. The blessing of God is much greater than any blessing we could ever save for ourselves.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
:9 The 'bountiful eye' reflects the mind of the man who is a 'cheerful giver' (2 Corinthians 9:7) - he is the man who will give 'pressed down and running over' (Luke 6:38).
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

22:13 The words of the slothful man form one of the Proverbs which Hezekiah's men copied out Prov 26:13. Why would they want to draw particular attention to this Proverb?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.3  There is a great deal of difference between faith and blind optimism. In fact, the latter is folly. God does not want us to put ourselves in dangerous situations and then expect Him to rescue us. This is exactly what this proverb is about. The Lord's prayer was; "lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil," which agrees completely with this proverb. Part of wisdom is knowing how to avoid danger.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
THE WORD IN YOUR HEART
 
Peter tells us, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have."  (1Pet 3:15)  The best way to do this is to have the answers we need in our hearts.  That is not to say that we recite our stock standard answers off like a parrot, but rather that we are familiar enough with the Word of God, that we have read it and thought about it often enough to be able to give those answers when they are needed.
 
This is what the saying of the wise is teaching us.  "Pay attention and listen to the sayings of the wise; apply your heart to what I teach, for it is pleasing when you keep them in your heart and have all of them ready on your lips."  (Prov 22:17-18)
 
Our job then, is to get the Word of God inside us - not by merely memorizing it, but by internalizing it.  We need to become so familiar with God's word that it becomes part of us and the words of God naturally come from our lips.  This will only come from consistently listening to what we are told in the Bible, by prayerfully considering it and keeping it on our minds all the time.  Only then will God's message to us become so treasured that it is in our heart.  When this is achieved we will be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks us to give a reason for the hope we have.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Robert
Solomon tells us in Prov 22:1 that great riches do not compare with a godly reputation.  It is better to be known for our grace and mercy than for the size of our bank balance.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

22:28 The oppression ‘in the gate’ is in matters of judgment. The gate was the place of judgment in Biblical times. Lot sat in the gate of Sodom – Gen 19:1- as a judge – Gen 19:9


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
V.9 - like much of Proverbs, we can see levels of application in this verse. In a material sense it can refer to those who generously share with those who are not of means. It can also refer to those who have spiritual understanding and love for their neighbors (or brothers and sisters) in spiritual need to generously encourage and share the word.  In this instance the chosen word for "poor" Heb. "dal" (1800) means "lean, poor, weak, dangling, thin, needy, poor (man), weaker". In opposition to the prevailing worldly wisdom, by generously giving we gain.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

22:4 In this world ‘humility’ is not seen to tend towards ‘riches’. In reality the humility that God seeks, though not tending to worldly riches, will bring eternal riches. We need to be careful not to confuse the world’s way of thinking with the Divine mind.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

22:6,15 These two verses which speak of instruction of a child actually have a spiritual application for us. When we are ‘children’ in spiritual things – just after baptism – require careful training. That training is, in part at least, through God’s chastening. If we are ‘trained’ well when young in Christ we will maintain our faith. It is a matter of building solid foundation in our faith. Not simply in the things that we believe but in the things that we do. For example if we have not developed good habits of Bible readings or attending meeting when we are young it is unlikely that such traits will develop when we are ‘old’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

EXCUSES

 

"The sluggard says, 'There is a lion outside!' or 'I will be murdered in the streets!'" (Prov 22:13)

 

There are ofetn things that we should do that we don't want to do, and making excuses is a great way to avoid them. Sometimes we even go so far as to believe the excuses we invent. Perhaps the sluggard had to go to the market or plow his field. Both of these are very important things to do and by avoiding them, believeing that he would be eaten by a lion or be murdered in the streets, he was instead sentencing himself to a slow painful death by starvation. Surely it would have been better to take his chances with the rest of the world who would all leave and return home safely to see the light of another day.

 

God has asked us to preach his word. Yet many of us, myself included, do just the same as the sluggard and make excuses. 'I would die if they laught at me,' 'I can't handle rejection,' 'No one is interested any way,' or, 'I wouldn't know what to say.' But actually, we wouldn't die is someone laughed at us, and usually they don't - but imagine the headlines if we did! "Victim Killed By Laughter, Police Seeking Smiler." And yes, we can handle rejection. If we couldn't handle rejection we would never have taken a job interview or sat an exam or even played Snakes and Ladders!

 

Something I have learned is that people are more inetersted in what we have to say than we might think. God will give us the right words, and those words will improve will practice. We just need to use them.

 

So let's leave the excuses and get on with the jobs God wants us to do.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Robert

22:8 We are into ‘sowing’ again. We came across ‘sowing in Prov 6:14,19,28 and it always the wicked who do the sowing in these passages. Apt because the seed is sown but the consequences are often not seen for some time but by then the growth is so great it is impossible, or very difficult, to remove the problem that has been sown.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.6 can be considered with v.15.

V.14 is mirrored in Prov 23:27.

V.17 Bow down thine ear is a phrase often used in prayer to Yahweh (e.g. Psa 86:1).

V.26 Yahweh advises us not to become a surety (guarantor) for anyone’s debt. If that person defaults then we are liable to pay his debt (see Prov 6:1,2; 17:18).

V.27 This practice is condemned under the Law (Deut 19:14; 27:17).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

22:1  Whilst a ‘good name’ is to be ‘chosen’ we do not do the choosing. It is our lifestyle which determines what sort of ‘name’ we have.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - John  4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to John 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to John 4 online in the New International Version

 

v. 5 - There is a point made here about this particular place. A parcel of ground - bought in Gen.33:19, given to Joseph in Gen.48:21,22, and used later to bury Joseph's bones in Jos.24:32. The point here is surely to emphasise the contrast between the place (being of great Jewish heritage) and the conversation with a gentile Samaritan woman, which led, as always with the gentiles that are recorded to great awe and wonder at the power of God. And yet the Jews had allowed this special place of their heritage to become part of the land of Samaria.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 46 Cana is only mentioned in John's gospel. John 2:1 here 21:2 Was it the miracle at Cana which Convinced Nathanael that Jesus was worth following?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
There are a number of links with the Song of Solomon in this chapter
4:6   sat  Song 1:7  
4:6   sixth hour   Song 1:7  
4:10   Living water  Song 4:16  
4:34   My meat  Song 1:7  

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
We may see the record here as separate and distinct from Chapter 3. However we should remember that Nicodemus was a Pharisee and he said 'we now' which implies that he had been sent by the Pharisees to find out about Jesus' position. So 4:1 is telling us the information that Nicodemus related to them on his return.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
4:5 - Why is Joseph mentioned here?
There is a daughter about to be made for the family of Abraham to increase the divine name by the "increaser"(Joseph). The converted Samaritans called Jesus the "Saviour of the world"(vs 42) which is what Pharaoh called Joseph(Gen 41:45-Zaphnath-paaneah).

Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Matt
V.49  The nobleman showed his faith, by asking Christ to come and heal his son. But his faith was not complete. The man could not believe that his son could be cured without the physician coming to the patient. His faith was perfected when Christ told him "Go thy way, thy son liveth" The nobleman now believed. (V.50
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
4:1 Doubtless the 'Pharisees hear' what Jesus had been doing from Nicodemus who had just (John 3) been to see Jesus, probably having been sent by the Sanhedrin.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.37-38 The disciples, as reapers will be able to rejoice in a spiritual crop which they had not planted.. A man may reap where he has not sown (Deut 6:11;, Josh 24:13) or a sower may never experience the joy of reaping (Deut 28:30;, Job 31:8;, Mic 6:15) We have all reaped where we did not sow. We must all become sowers, so others may be able to reap. By doing so we can always be assured that there will always be a harvest for others.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

4:1       We wonder how the Pharisees ‘heard’ what Jesus had been doing. Maybe Nicodemus learnt that when he met with Jesus as recorded in chapter 3.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

4:3 In John 2:13 Jesus is seen going to Jerusalem. Here we see Jesus returning to Galilee. The meeting with Nicodemus must, therefore, have taken place in Jerusalem. Jesus had gone to Jerusalem and the religious leaders had taken the opportunity to check out this new preacher.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
When we hear the gospel from someone, we must then listen to it for ourselves. We must take the words of Christ into our hearts, and must make them our own. We must not simply learn these truths 2nd or 3rd hand. To illustrate this the Samaritans listened to Jesus for two whole days, and then told the woman that they no longer believed just because of her words, but now they had heard him for themselves (John 4:39-42).

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to David

4:1    Jesus’ reaction to the fact that it became known that John had baptized more people than himself  is characteristic of Jesus. He never wanted to draw attention to himself We see in his miracles how often he commanded the one healed not to publicise what had been done for them. Jesus wanted people to follow him because of his message, not his miracles.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

4:4 The comment ‘he must needs go through Samaria’ requires some thought. The easiest route from Jerusalem to Galilee is down towards Jericho and then north along the Jordan valley. It is a level easy route. However to go from Jerusalem to Galilee via Samaria is a more demanding route along through the hills. So the necessity was not ease of travel. There was work to do. There was a woman there in need of the gospel. How often do we take the arduous route to preach the gospel rather than making life easy for yourselves?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

GOD - The Father and creator of all things

God must be worshipped in spirit and in truth - therefore our basic understanding of God (and His word) must not be in error - John 4:24God dwells in heaven with no God beside Him - Psa 115:3,16; Matt 6:9; Deut 10:14; Deut 6:4; Isa 44:6-8; Isa 45:5; Mark 12:29-32; 1Cor 8:6; Eph 4:6God was/is eternal, is immortal (can't die), can't be seen by men, is unchanging - Psa 90:2; 1Tim 6:13-16; 1Tim 1:17; James 1:17; Mal 3:6. God is all-powerful - Rev 19:6 (KJV); Jer 10:10-13; Luke 1:35; Acts 1:8; Luke 24:49. God is all-knowing - Isa 46:9-10; Jer 1:5-7; Acts 15:18 (KJV). God is present everywhere - Psa 139:7-12; Jer 23:23-24; 2Chron 16:9God is loving and merciful - Lam 3:22-23; Eze 33:11; 2Pet 3:9; Mic 7:18-20.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

 

V.2 If this statement is true, then John 3:22 must mean that the disciples baptized under the direction of Jesus.  Then, Jesus would be credited for the acts performed.

Vs.3,4 For Jesus to reach Galilee from Judea he had no choice but to pass through Samaria (a three-day journey according to Josephus) (Luke 17:11).  Samaria was situated immediately north of Judea; Galilee was situated immediately north of Samaria.

V.9 In Jews’ minds, the Samaritans were not, as it were: scraping the bottom of the barrel; they were: scraping the underneath.

To understand the Jews’ extremely low opinion of the Samaritans, you have to trace the Samaritans’ beginning.  In Nehemiah’s time - this was during the 6th. Century B.C. - Jerusalem was being rebuilt after the exile to Babylon.  There had been intermarriage of some remnant Jews with non-Jews and there had been extensive worship of foreign gods. This group lived in Samaria and became known as the Samaritans. They hindered Nehemiah and the restoration of Jerusalem. 

The returning Jews' deep hatred and mistrust of these idolatrous half-Jews, at this time, passed down through the ages to form the backdrop to Christ's dealing with the Samaritan woman and his parable of the Good Samaritan

Vs.25,26,42 Cornelius is considered the first Gentile convert to Christ (Acts 11:13,14). And so he was in the apostolic era. But, could not this Samaritan woman actually be the first? Then, there were other Samaritans (vs.39,41).  


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

The reunification of Israel and Judah

During the reign of David and Solomon the kingdom of Israel had been united. Yet this unity had been hard to win, and even harder to maintain. The northern kingdom, later to come under the general name of Samaria, had no natural affinity with the kingly line. The kingly line was of Judah, whereas the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph) felt the leadership of Israel ought to come from them as the favourite of Jacob.

In this chapter of John we have the issue between these two camps tackled head on. Notice how specific the location is (v5). This was the plot of land Jacob bought legally to live on (Gen 33:18-20), and passed on by inheritance to Ephraim and Mannaseh in Gen 48:22. It was just outside Shechem. The sons of Jacob then took the city of Shechem by force and plundered it (Gen 34). Notice that they killed all the men but kept all the women alive for themselves, so many of their descendants would be half Shechemite. At the break up of the joint kingdom, Jereboam built up Shechem again and instituted a rival form of worship to that of the Jews (1Kin 12). Hence Jesus' statement "salvation is of the Jews" (v20-22).

Now notice how Jesus sets about to heal the rift of generations. He makes the effort to go through the foreign area of Samaria, rather than passing by it on the road to Jericho (see Peter's 2009 comment). He asks for help. He engages a woman in conversation. He shows he is willing to be associated with her and her people. (Bear in mind this is the King of Israel, and also declares himself to be the Messiah v25-26)). He then shows the Samaritan woman that she needn't go up to Jerusalem to worship, but that worship is now acceptable "in spirit and truth", in other words wherever you are. And most wonderfully of all, he tells her that "God is seeking such (as her) to worship Him". No wonder his gospel was accepted with open arms (v39-42).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

4:40-43 Jesus was on his way to Galilee. Doubtless there was a reason for going to Galilee. However, because of the request from the Samaritans he changed his plans and remained with them two days before continuing on his planned journey./ Are we willing to change our plans to accommodate unforeseen opportunities or are we so self centred that we will not change our own plans for the benefits of others?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

READY FOR HARVEST

 

As Jesus passed through the Samaritan region and discovered crowds of people who were receptive to his teaching, he pointed out the fields to his disciples. He said to them, "Do you not say, 'Four months and then the harvest'? I tell you, open your eyes and look at the fields! they are ripe for harvest." (John 4:35)

 

No one would have thought that the Samaritans were a field of God that were worth harvesting. After all, they didn't really belong in the land of Israel, they didn't really believe the same things about the same God, and they didn't worship in Jerusalem. Yet these people were regarded by Jesus as people ready and needing to hear the good news of the kingdom of God.

 

Perhaps we, like the discipes of Jesus, can also be a bit blind when it comes to seeing God's field with clarity. Because people are different to the way we are, or because they don't worship in the way we do, even though they have mistaken beliefs or are still struggling to overcome their old way of life, it does not mean that they are not part of God's field. These people might be much more responsive to the gospel of the kingdom then we give them credit for

 

So let's give the people around us the benefit of the doubt and look on them as part of God's field, ready for harvest.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Robert