|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.19
- 28 - People chosen directly by name by God. Is this unique? By the end of
all their work (Josh.19:51) these are called the 'heads of the fathers of the
tribes'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
11
Chinnereth is the ancient name for the Sea of Galilee here
Deuteronomy 3:17 Joshua 13:27 19:35 After this the name does not occur again.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We see in this
chapter the fact that it is God that determines the borders of our kingdoms, as
he has ultimate control of all things. There is much emphasis on the borders of
lands - land is wealth in the eyes of man. In the eyes of God, all border changes
are towards the fulfilment of His ultimate purpose. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We
now, on the borders of the land, see the first time that the borders of the inheritance
are laid out in general terms. :3 The south border :6 The west border :7 The north border :10 The east border :13 The land was to be inherited 'by lot' that is it was not left to the people to vie for the best piece of the land. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| There is value,
by using a map if necessary, in following the exact line of the borders. It will
help to familiarise us with the areas where each tribe settled. After all it is
to be our inheritance as well! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 35:19 That the revenger of blood as to execute the judgement teaches an important lesson. If we have matter with a brother or sister we should talk to that brother or sister ourselves. This is the first step. We should not seek to get another to deal with the matter unless our first approach is unsuccessful - and then we go with the person or persons who take up the matter Matt 18:15-16 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The order of the points of the compass given here is 34:3 South 34:6 West 34:7 North 34:10 East This is the only time this order is given in Scripture. Why would this be? Is it because Israel entered the land in the South? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In this chapter we have the boundary of the inheritance of Israel. We ask the question, did the Children of Israel ever possess all of this area? John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Of the twelve princes appointed by God to divide the land, only Caleb of Judah remains of the twelve spies, 38 years previously. God kept His word in Num 14:30. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
Some have suggested that the Promised Land includes the Sinai and part of Egypt. But clearly these boundaries do not go south into the Sinai. Besides, it is a preposterous idea to suggest that the land of slavery and idolatry could be part of the Promised Land. This would mean that the Children of Israel were in the Promised Land even before they were liberated. Israel held the Sinai Peninsula but gave it back to Egypt even though the Israelis had built towns there. The settlers were upset with the government that they had to move out and that their towns had to be destroyed. However, the rabbis had no problem with it as they stated that the Sinai was not part of the Promised Land and Israel should not occupy it. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
34:13 Remember that Moses is planning for the time when Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
34:17 In saying it was Eleazar and Joshua who were to divide the land we clearly see the change in leadership from Moses and Aaron who were both dead by the time Israel entered the land. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
34:2 Way back in Num 14 as Israel were turned back into the wilderness, God said ‘when ye be come into the land’ – something which might have seemed most improbable at that time, we see now being fulfilled at the end of the wilderness with almost identical words. God keeps His word! We should always remember that. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
34:3 What we call the Dead Sea is always called the Salt Sea in Scripture. Doubtless a comment upon its make up whereas the name we give it is a consequence of the fact that it is high in minerals – nothing, or very little, actually lives in it. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The present-day disputed West Bank is part of the Promised Land (Judea and Samaria). Also there are territories east of the River Jordan in present-day Jordan and Syria. These are the territories, from north to south, of: Manasseh (east); Gad; and Reuben. They were the conquered territories, from north to south, of: Bashan; Sihon/Ammon; Moab; and Edom. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
34:54 The river of Egypt is not the Nile but a wadi that runs through the Sinai peninsula about half way across the Sinai entering the Mediterranean. However, more significantly, it is one of the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham – Gen 15:18. Significantly the other border – The Euphrates – is not mentioned here in Numbers. This indicates that whilst the entering into the land of Canaan was a fulfilment of the promises to Abraham it was not the complete fulfilment. That must wait until Christ returns and the kingdom is re-established. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
v. 2,3 - This concept of there being things that God does not reveal is not exclusive to this passage. Deut.29:29 is quite clear. We are only allowed to know so much at this stage. Job 11:7,8, 38:4-40:2, Rom.11:33,34. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
1 The
men of Hezekiah copied out some of the proverbs of Solomon. Proverbs
25:1 - 29:27 is the
block of proverbs which they copied out. Therefore we should be looking for aspects
of these proverbs which answer to Hezekiah's experience. Maybe we should look
for instruction on how a king should behave. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.6,7
- Here is a very simple example of the humility of mind that God requires of man.
If we seek humility, as we should, let us praise the Lord our Father regularly,
as the action of praise has the recognition of our own frailty paramount in its
outworking. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :6-8
uses language which seems to be the basis for Jesus' words [Luke
14:8] in the parable. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| SEARCH IT OUT "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of Kings." The Bible is the Word of God. Inspired men wrote as God gave them the message. The word of God is perfect. There are no mistakes in it and it has been preserved for thousands of years and translated into our native languages so that we are able to read the message God had given us. But it is more than just a message from God to man - it is an invitation to become part of the family of God and to live with Him through eternity. Every page and every letter of this amazing book is there for a reason and it carries the signature of God. All the way through the Bible are patterns, types and prophesies that God has hidden from plain view and urges us to search out. The whole message of the Bible can be seen in what seem like simple stories in the text. Even lists of people's ancestors can tell their own incredible story if we just take the time to search out the jewels that God has hidden. Show your worth, honour and glory by searching his word today. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| :14
The clouds without rain is quoted (Jude
12) to speak of those who appear to have something to offer - actually they
present themselves as having some status. However they are destructive. We must
beware of anyone who is drawing attention to himself. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
There are many beautiful allusions which can be seen in the Proverbs. In today's Proverb reading (25:11), a fitly (aptly) spoken word is likened to apples of gold in a picture (framework or border) of silver. The Song of Solomon uses the figure of apples to describe sweetness, fragrance, and love (Song 2:3; 2:5; 7:8: 8:5). Such attributes befit the aptly spoken word. But why is there gold in a frame of silver? Gold is the most precious of metals because it shines brightly and does not tarnish. Unlike gold, silver will naturally tarnish and if left alone will turn black. Blackness represents sin. The (silver) half shekel of the sanctuary for the ransom of the Children of Israel is indicative of this reality. Silver is also associated with idolatry. For example, the statues of the goddess Diana (who was the Ephesian version of the Babylonian goddess Semiramis) were made of silver (Acts 19:24). And so we have apples of gold in a framework of silver. God's saints are found framed in a world of sin. Their responsibility is to shine untarnished amidst the surrounding ungodliness (Phil. 2:15). Their voice should be wholesome and Godly (Col. 3:8; Col. 4:6; 1 Pet. 4:11). The spoken word should give glory to God (1 Cor. 10:31). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
24:24 Hezekiah's men 'copied out' some of Solomon's proverbs Prov 25:1. This one is found earlier in Prov 21:9. Work out why it is re-presented here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.4-5 As separating impurities from ore, leaves pure silver, same as gold.(1 Pet 1:7) So taking from a king wicked counsellers leaves a wise ruler. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| SELF CONTROL "Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self control." (Prov 25:28) Self control is one of the backbones of our Christian life. More than that, it is the basis for any life that is lived in a respectable way. Self control is what helps us to put our faith into action and to act in the way that we know that we should. It is also the strength that prevents us from doing the things that we know we should not do. Self control, then, is our defense against doing what we should not do and keeps us within the boundaries of what we should do. Maybe this is what Solomon meant when he spoke about a lack of self control being like a city whose walls were broken down. Without it's walls the city is totally unprotected. Anyone can come in - not just friends - but also enemies. The enemies who are freely able to enter can wreak havoc on an unprotected city. The walls also provide boundaries from within, stopping people from straying away from the protection that is offered within the city. Without city walls the residents of the city are as good as dead. Without self control we have no hope of living a Christ-like life and no hope of the eternal life we have been offered. Without self control our defenses against sin are too weak to have any effect. Let's strengthen our self control and build up the walls in the life we live. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| GENTLENESS AND FORCE "Through patience a ruler can be pursuaded, and a gentle tongue can break a bone." (Prov 25:15) There is an old story about the sun and the wind. They were having an argument about who was stronger and as neither could win the arguement, they decided to have a competition. An old man was walking through a park wearing a coat, so the sun and the wind agreed that whoever could get the coat off the old man would be the winner. The wind began first by blowing a hard, cold wind at the man. The old man pulled his coat around him and walked on. So the wind whipped itself up into a hurricane force, but the harder it blew, the tighter the old man gripped his coat. Finally the wind gave up. Then the sun tried. Gently it came out and shone on the old man. Slowly the sun grew warmer and warmer. The old man loosened his grip on the coat, loosened the buttons and finally took his coat right off. The strength of gentleness and kindness had won out over the ferocity of the wind. Are we the wind or the sun? Do we bowl in determined to make change or get our message across whether people like it or not? Or do we, as Solomon advises, with patience and gentleness watch as people melt to our touch. We can achieve much more doing it slowly and gently than we can by force. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| V.6-7 Do not intrude into the presence of the king, for the evevation of the humble is honorable, but the humbling of the proud disgraceful. (Luke 14:8-10) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| The first two verses of today’s chapter, (Prov 25:1,2), gives us a look at two things we might not otherwise have known. a) Hezekiah’s men actually copied out some of the words Solomon had written – another good work to add to Hezekiah’s list; and b) God purposely hides some of His activities, so that intelligent and godly kings can search them out. This makes us think of the wonders of nature which some of our clever biologists are discovering, but which have of-course been created in the first place by God. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
25:21-22 These verses are quoted – Rom 12:20– as instruction to those of us who want to be acceptable living sacrifices. Now the proverb is not teaching us that we can bring punishment upon others by our actions. Rather, as the verse continues, our behaviour marks a difference between the way that God deals with them and us. The judgment is of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.26 It is a well known fact that one can not get healthy and pure water from a polluted source, likewise, when the rightous are oppressed by the wicked, their ability to do good is lessened, or even possibly destroyed. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.20 - a person who is deeply sad or depressed doesn't need a tactless person telling them to cheer up and snap out of it. It helps to be in tune with a person's feelings so you can have empathy and better connect with them; Rom 12:15 offers some insights into common sense psychology. V.22 - "heap burning coals on his head, and the Lord will reward you" (NIV). I've heard it said this likely is an allusion to the smelting/purification/softening of ore with hot coals so fine metals can be extracted. Perhaps it is refering here to softening and refining attitudes/dispositions in enemies (v.21) so as to win them over by treating them well. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
25:9 The wise man’s counsel is to resolve issues with those concerned rather than to go about as a talebearer seeking support from others whoa re not involved in the dispute. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
25:9 The wise man’s counsel is to resolve issues with those concerned rather than to go about as a talebearer seeking support from others whoa re not involved in the dispute. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
25:8 The idea of not being hasty to go to strife seems to be the basis of Jesus’ parable – Luke 14:31 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.22 The expression: heap burning coals of fire upon his head is also used in Rom 12:20. The phrase means to make the individual in question burn with shame. It is hope that the enemy, being shown kindness, will become shamed and repent of his hostility. In Egypt, guilty people were made to carry a pan of burning coals on their head as an indication of shame and repentance. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
25:18 The word translated ‘maul’ <04650> is only found in this passage in Scripture However it is derived from the word <06327> which is variously translated ‘scatter’ ‘disperse’ or other similar words. Thus we learn, by looking at the way related words are used elsewhere, what a word which only occurs once in Scripture means. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.4 When Gog wreaks havoc on Israel two-thirds of the population will die (Zech 13:8). The third that shall be saved by Jesus will realize that He is the messiah. Then their education will begin. Yahweh says that he will refine them as silver (Zech 13:9). V.16 Everything in moderation. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof (Matt 6:34). V.17 Don’t overstay your welcome and don’t live in someone’s back pocket. A modern saying: Too much familiarity breeds contempt. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
25:5 The principle of the throne being established in righteousness is built into a prophecy of Messiah – Isa 16:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
2-10 - Was this a fulfilment of Amos
5:13-15? In Matt.10:16,
Jesus sends his disciples and warns them of the same dangers. His advice to them
at that time is interesting.
Luke 10:3, Acts 20:29. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
11
That the Jews sought Jesus at the feast even though he was not obviously there
confirms that it was Jesus's custom to fulfil the requirements of the law that
every male should appear three times in the year at the main feasts Exodus
27:13 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:50
Remember that Jesus had already spoken to Nicodemus (Chapter 3) and that this
chapter contains a number of echoes of the language that Jesus used when speaking
with Nicodemus. Here Nicodemus begins to show his true colours as a secret disciple
of Jesus. The words Jesus has spoken to him are beginning to bear fruit. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| WHAT DO YOU
SAY ABOUT JESUS? People were divided over who Jesus really was. Some thought he was a prophet. Others thought he could possibly be the Messiah and others were convinced that he was an expert liar. Not even his own brothers believed him. Yet those who did not believe, even thought they were the most knowledgeable and influential religious experts of the day, could not prove that Jesus was not who he said he was. Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, the Messiah. They did not want to believe because he challenged their thinking and traditions and made them feel uncomfortable. And so we can look through history and find that people have always struggled with the same question. Who is Jesus? A prophet? A liar? Or the Messiah? The important question to ask now is, who do you say Jesus is? Your answer will influence your actions. If you believe that Jesus is a liar then it is important that you prove your point beyond reasonable doubt. If you believe that Jesus is a prophet then you must learn from him. If you believe he is the Messiah then you must trust him, believe him and follow him, no matter what the cost. What do you say? Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| :2
In saying that tabernacles' was near we have moved on about 6 months from the
incidents in the previous chapter. Passover was the 14th day of the 1st month (Leviticus 23:5) whereas Tabernacles started on 15th day of the 7th month (Leviticus 23:34) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:52
- "Search and look" - Jonah was the only Old Testament prophet from
Galilee. He came from Gath-Hepher (2
Kings 14:25- winepress of the well). Hepher means- to pry or search out. Matt Drywood [Hamilton Ewen Rd (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Matt |
||||||||||
Jesus was gaining major status in the eyes on many. Even the officers (subordinates) of the chief priests and Pharisees attested: Never man spake like this man. (v.46). Further provoked by Nicodemus' question (v.52), the Pharisees retorted defensively: Art thou also of Galilee? Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet. This means, perhaps, no major prophet. The Pharisees might have been aware that Jonah (and perhaps Nahum) was from Galilee, but the four pillars of Hebrew prophecy, Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah, and Jeremiah were not. Thus, from the Pharisee's viewpoint, the argument could have been: You are saying that this Jesus is a major prophet, but search the scriptures and see that no major prophet has ever come from Galilee. However, the Pharisees knew that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem (Mic 5:2; v.42). But, they probably did not know that Jesus was born there. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.2 We are now just six months away from the crucifixion.(from the feast of tabernacles to the the passover) There was a move to have Christ put away during this feast.(V.20,21,25) During the feast an attempt to arrest Jesus was made. (V30) But, on the last day of the feast the Sanhedin sent the temple guard to arrest Him, but, came back empty handed. (V.32,46) It was at time that Nicademus steped forward saying, That a man was innocent until proven guilty. (V.52) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 7:3 His disciples encouragement that he go to Jerusalem show the extent to which Jesus' works in Galilee were an embarrassment to his family. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:7 Whilst Jesus says ‘the world cannot hate you’ he is not thinking of gentiles. The world he speaks of is the Jewish world. So he is saying that the Jews are ‘evil’ in the way that they behave. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v 23 circumcision vs healing on the sabbath: the contrast of causing a wound vs healing; of a small part vs the whole man Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
7:15 The Jews amazement was because Jesus had not been to any of their Rabbinical schools. They thought that they were the source of all knowledge about Scripture. Jesus had not been taught by them so he, by implication, could not know anything. However they could clearly see that his exposition had credibility. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
a) It’s possible that one of the officers who failed to arrest Jesus tried to make up for this later by slapping him in the presence of Annas, the High Priest’s father in law (John 18:22).
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||
| V.50 After three years we are once again introduced to Nicodemus. We see how he has matured in his eventual commitment to serve Christ. He showed great courage in insisting that Jesus be given a trial, pointing out to the other Pharisees that he was innocent until proven guilty. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
7:6 In what way was ‘your time is always ready’? In one way their time was always ready to repent and believe in him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The one work spoken of in v21 appears to be the healing of the man at the pool of Bethesda in 5:5-10. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
7:4 It is difficult to understand what the disciples mean by suggesting that Jesus did things ‘in secret’ as by this time in his ministry he had been all round Galilee and in Jerusalem preaching. Unless they wished to denigrate his teaching as having little impact. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
V.1 Jesus left Judea because there were some out to kill him. V.3 His brethren would mean those from Jesus’ natural family. There is no reason why Joseph and Mary could not or should not have more children after Jesus. It is only the Catholic Church that denies this happened to perpetuate the virginity of Mary. V.5 At that point they did not believe Jesus was the Messiah as He had not taken political control (as the Jews expected the Messiah to do). Nevertheless, Jesus’ brethren had the experience of seeing many of His miracles. James the son of Alphaeus was one of Jesus’ brethren: whether a brother; cousin; or kinsman. He is called the Lord’s brother in Gal 1:19. He is also called an apostle which shows that his earlier sceptical position had changed. Also, it appears that James became the leader of the ecclesia at Jerusalem (Acts 21:17,18). V.13 fear of the Jews means fear of the Jewish leaders. V.14 Jesus preached in the synagogue despite having some in Jerusalem ready to kill him (v.25). V.35 The Jews speculated were Jesus would go. Would he go to the Jews scattered (dispersed) among the Gentiles (Greeks), (i.e. in the former Empire founded by Alexander the Great)? Or, would he go to the Gentiles (Greeks) themselves? Vs.41,42 Since early childhood, Jesus’ home was in Galilee. However, he was born in Bethlehem which fulfils prophecy saying that the Messiah will come from Judah (Mic 5:2; Matt 2:1). Ephratah means Judah and is attached to Bethlehem to distinguish it from Bethlehem in Zebulun. The Jews evidentially were unaware that Jesus was born in Bethlehem Ephratah. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:10 ‘in secret’ in a way echoes the accusation of his brethren in verse 4 but of course Jesus was not seeking to avoid being seen as subsequent events in the record show. When he was at the feast he became very ‘public’. However there are times when it is good not to be seen openly and there are times when it is important to be ‘public’ with ones comments. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||