April 17

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Numbers  36
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Numbers 36 online in the King James Version
Listen to Numbers 36 online in the New International Version

 

v. 3 - The occasions when women reach equality with men in the Old Testament are rare, but this is one. Another is the Nazarite vow (6:2)
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.1 This concern develops the problem raised by the daughters of Zelophehad. Time had gone on and reflection on the situation had caused the implications of inheritance to be brought to the fore - one wonders whether one of the daughters was planning to marry - and so a solution has to be found. Clearly Yahweh knew that this problem would occur when he gave the legislation for the daughters of Zelophehad. So why was not this point covered as well? The reason is that the Father gives us as much as we need at any one time and leaves us to reflect and use our own minds to be exercised in the things we know. Additional issues are presented as we need them - or grow. This is how we deal with the 'first principles'. We certainly do not see the implications when we are baptised but as we grow we see more and more implications. We have the Scripture to answer our questions which is 36:5 'according to the word of the Lord' in the case we are considering.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
The practical implication of the previous decision regarding Zelophehad's inheritance being passed to his daughters as he had no sons was that this land would pass to another tribe if they married outside the tribe. So we have a new rule for those (few) women who have an inheritance that they must marry within their own tribe. As always, with privilege comes responsibility.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
36:9 The land was distributed 'by lot'. The laws of inheritance meant that the land went with the man who had married the daughter who had inherited from her father - like the daughters of Zelophehad. Thus the requirement to marry within the tribe would ensure that no marriages would destroy the Divinely appointed division of the land.

The counterpart in our ecclesial life is that our marriages should not upset the equilibrium of the ecclesia. So marriages to the unbeliever, for example, are totally unacceptable.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:13 So even though Moses is dead we are reading things that Moses commanded. We should be alert to the fact that the record does not always run chronologically.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
36:1-5 Notice, even at the end of the wilderness journey there are details of the application of the law of Moses which have not yet been resolved. This highlights that the law of Moses was not the complete answer to the people's problems - it required the sacrifice of Jesus to do that.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
God commanded that the inherited land was not to move from the possession of one tribe to another (Num 36:9). This reminds us of godly Naboth withstanding the most ungodly King Ahab (1Kin 21).

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David
Succession in preserving the tribal allotments was as important as the injunction not to encroach on another's tribal territory (Deut 19:14, 27:17, Prov 22:28, 23:10).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

OBEDIENCE
Sometimes situations arise when we are vexed by a question and we don’t know what to do. Often the answer is found in the word of God.  At other times our situation is not covered by what is in the Bible and neither is it a matter of conscience. At those times we can either make a decision ourselves based on our own knowledge and understanding, or we can ask God for help in our decision making.

The tribe of Manessah had one of these problems so they decided to ask the LORD through Moses for the solution. God gave the tribe the answer they came for concerning the daughters of Zelophehad. In many ways it could have been quite a harsh answer to their question. They were to marry only within their clan so that their inheritance would not pass out of the tribe in the year of Jubilee.

But what if there were no suitable men in their tribe? What if they were in love with someone from another tribe? We do not know what their personal circumstances were at the time, but we do know what the Bible says about them. "So Zelophehad’s daughters did as the LORD commanded Moses." (Num 36:10)   Whether it was convenient or whether they wanted to or not, they did what the LORD commanded them to do.

Sometimes the answers we get are not always what we would like to hear, but even then, let us do as Zelophehad’s did, doing as the LORD commands us.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Robert

V,13 The Israelitish encampment was on an extensive plateau north of the Arnon, which taken from the Moabites by Sihon and Og, still retained the name of its original possessors. This particular site "Jordan near Jericho", is now called El-Koura,a large plain lying not far from Nebo, between the Arnon and a small stream, the Weal.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

36:7      The provision of the law of Moses that the land remained within the tribe to which it was given by inheritance had the effect of removing the possibility, if it was observed, of individuals becoming ‘land barons’ by acquisition.  The flesh always seeks more. God gives what is necessary.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
Inheritance could not pass from tribe to tribe (v.9).  And so Zelophehad's daughters were obliged to marry within their own tribe.  They married their cousins (vs.11,12).  Interesting that the name Zelophehad means my kinsman is my protector.
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael
KEEPING THE INHERITANCE
 
The tribe of Manasseh had a potential problem with Zelophehad's daughters. If they were to marry outside their tribe, the inheritance they would receive from Zelophehad's estate would pass into the hands of other tribes, causing Manasseh's boundaries to be decreased. The heads of the clan Zelophehad belonged to were so concerned about this that the came to Moses wanting a solution from God for their problem. The solution they were given turned out to be an easy one. Zelophehad's daughters were to marry men from their own tribe. That way, their inheritance would not pass out of their tribe and into another.
 
But there is more at stake here than the inheritance of Zelophehad's daughters or anyone else's daughters from the tribes of Israel. Paul said that we should marry only in the Lord. (1Cor 7:39) Inheriting the promises God has given us is at risk if we marry a spouse who does not share the same faith as ours. Like the leaders of Zelophehad's clan, we must be very concerned if any of our young people look like they are going to throw away their inheritance in this way. It does not always happen, but the risks are huge.
 
So let's look at marriage outside the faith very seriously and do all we can to see that we are in a position to inherit what God has planned for us.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert

36:2 The mater of the inheritance and the daughters of Zelophehad has already been dealt with in detail in Num 27:1-2. This highlights the importance of the mater of dealing with inheritance and the fact that it should stay within the tribe.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

36:9  It is common in wealthy families to inter marry to preserve or increase wealth and power. This was not to be in Israel. Hence this provision was made that the inheritance remained with the tribe. It is not that the ownership of the land is the important point. It is important to realise that men should not try to take away that which God has given.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

The preservation of allotted land was of utmost importance to Israel. All Semites shared this value. It still exists today. The seemingly unsolvable problem between the Israelis and the Palestinians has to do with claims on the land. Those of us, living in the west, cannot really understand the magnitude of the problem. We can buy and sell land and property without any compunction, as a matter of convenience. Those in the Near East cannot, as their history, identity, and family honor are all tied up in the land.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

36:5 ‘according to the word of the Lord’ is a recurring phrase in the book of Num 16:3,16,51, Num 4:45 and here and passes into Biblical usage. It stands as a stamp of authority. A form of shorthand saying that it is God’s word.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.3 There is an interesting insight in Hebrew that is not apparent in English.

The word they is translated from the Hebrew l’hem which means to them.

The strange thing is that l’hem is masculine. The feminine is l’hen. The same is true in Num 27:7 where to them is l’hem.

And so, the question is: Why were the daughters of Zelophehad addressed in the masculine form instead of the normal feminine form? It appears that, for inheritance purposes, they were being treated as sons.

V.36 In this account the order of Zelophehad’s daughters is: Mahlah, Tirzah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Noah.

But in all the other accounts the order is:

Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah (Num 26:33, 27:1;Josh 17:3).

It seems odd that, in this account, Tirzah and Noah have changed places.

Offspring are listed in order of age. And so, it appears that Mahlah is the oldest and Tirzah is the youngest.

Mahlah means sickness or disease; Noah means movement; Hoglah means partridge; Milcah means queen; and Tirzah means delight (same as the royal city of Jeroboam. Tirzah was a place renowned for its beauty).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

36:11 The case of the daughters of Zelophehad is singled out here at the end of the wilderness journey. However doubtless there were many other families with no sons at that time and in later times. So this laying out the principle for one family set a precedent for all Israel.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Proverbs 27
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Proverbs 27 online in the King James Version
Listen to Proverbs 27 online in the New International Version

 

v. 1,2 - Warnings to be sure that we remain humble and wise to possibilities. We are in God's hands, we have no control over what might come next in our lives but we trust him to order our lives for us and only by his grace are we praiseworthy. Isa.56:12, Luke 12:19-20, 2Cor.10:12,18, 12:11, James 4:13-16.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
27 v.1-12 Describes the thought patterns and behaviour of different individuals in the circumstances around the last week of Jesus life. 27:1 'boast not of tomorrow' Peter, who said that he would not deny Jesus 27:2 Jesus, by 'holding his peace' Mark 14:61 was not praising himself. 27:4 The 'envy' that was so cruel that Jesus was not able to stand before it was the 'envy' of those who delivered him to Pilate - Mark 15:10, Matt.27:6 The 'kisses' is the kiss by which Judas betrayed Jesus. 27:9 Which contrasts with the 'ointment and perfume' or Mary in John 12 when she anointed Jesus feet. 27:12 Peter did not 'foresee the evil' so instead of hiding he went into the palace of the High Priest.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.7 has a reference obliquely to the attitude of the children of Israel in the matters concerning manna. When they were hungry for it but as soon as they were filled with it they fast became fed up with the same food every day and the events of Num 11:4-20 take place. We must take care in our spiritual feeding each day that we do not suffer the same loathing.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:14 The man who behaves in this way is only doing things for show. It is like the 'greetings in the market place' [Matthew 23:7] and is the way in which the world behaves. True friendship does not require a show and a noise. The one greeting does not make the show and the one being greeted does not need the show.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:20 The servant of God should really take this to heart. We are never satisfied with the things that we want. This is exemplified in children. They 'have to have' something but when they have it they very shortly afterwards want something else. We, as adults, are just like that, though we pretend that we are not.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

27:12 This Proverbs is encouraging us to think about the future. We must take account of what we think may happen in our lives and prepare ourselves. The fool is the one who carries blindly along. It might be thought that this contradicts Jesus 'take no thought'Matt 6:31  but not so. Jesus was talking about anxious thought. We must both trust God and 'work out our own salvation Phil 2:12


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.10  Our true friends must not be forsaken. The ties of blood may be less reliable than those of genuine friendship. Our friends are those of our spiritual family, when help is needed, it is our ecclesial family that is there in many ways, not the least in prayer. James 5:14-16 These are our true friends. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

V.6 Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss (Luke 22:47,48).
 
V.18 The fig tree was a symbol of Israel. However, Israel had not kept the faith and rejected its master.  Therefore, it was cursed (Matt 21:19,20).
 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

James tells us the same as Solomon. James 4:13-17 says that we should say that God Willing we shall live and so be able to do this or that. Prov 27:1 says in a very similar vein that we should not boast about tomorrow. We mustn’t presume that we shall be able to do anything, tomorrow.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

27:22 So the fool is not susceptible to chastening. Are we? Or are we fools? It only those who are exercised – Heb 12:11 - who benefit from chastening.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
V.21 - when receiving praise (or acquiring knowledge 1Cor 8:1) we have to be careful it doesn't go to our head John 12:43.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

27:10 Family are valuable, however a neighbour who understands Lev 19:18 will be more use in calamity. It is the nearness of the neighbour that provides the particular support. This means that when we see a brother in need we should not leave the relieving of the problem to others. We should attend to his need as he is our neighbour. It is all to easy to leave things to others thinking that ‘it is not our problem.’ In reality our brother’s need is indeed our problem if we truly appreciate Lev 19:18


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

27:18 It is an accepted fact that diligence does secure a reward (John 8:12).                    

27:21 Praise is a test of character for all. Praise is handled differently by men. The vain man seeks it; the weak man is inflated by it; the wise man disregards it. 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

27:18 Jesus – John 12:26 – applies the principle of this verse to those who would be his servants.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.4 The first murder was the result of jealousy (Gen 4:4-8).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

27:7 Solomon is not simply speaking about how we react to food. He is speaking about our attitude to Scripture. It we are satisfied with the things of this life the ;bitter’ things of the word of God will be abhorrent to us. But if we hunger for the word as if we cannot get enough of it then even the ‘bitter’ things – the constraints that it lays upon us – will be seen to be good and wholesome


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.1 relates to Matt 6:34.

V.2 is echoed by the modern expression: self-praise is no commendation.

V.13 is the same as Prov 20:16.

V.14 is reflected in the Italian proverb: He who praises you more than he was wont to do, has either deceived you, or is about to do it.

V.15 There is a controversial torture practice called waterboarding. Here the victim lies on his back and his face is covered by a cloth. Then a continuous dripping of water on the cloth produces the effect on the victim that he is drowning. A man living with a contentious woman also feels like he is drowning.

V.17 The intelligent interaction between two friends sharpens both.

V.19 The heart of man reflects exactly the sum of his character. But, man cannot truly assess his heart. Only Yahweh can (Psa 44:21).

V.20 reflects 1John 2:16.

V.22 Even though a fool were crushed he would still retain his foolishness.

V.23 If you want your flock to be healthy and happy and to grow and multiply, then you have to take care of them. The same applies to leaders of an ecclesia.

V.26 If you want to have enough lambs to exchange for your clothing, and enough goats to pay for a field; then you had better look after your flocks (v.23).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

27:1 The exhortation not to speak as if we know what tomorrow will bring is given a very practical application – James 4:12 – by the apostle James. We must realise that God, not we, is in control of our lives.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - John  9 and 10
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to John 9 online in the King James Version Listen to John 10 online in the King James Version
Listen to John 9 online in the New International Version Listen to John 10 online in the New International Version

 

9 v.4 - Here again is our required reliance on God shown to us in our master. We should adopt the same attitude - 'I must do the will of him that sent me, while it is day.' Our lifetime is of unknown length but definitely no more than a wink of time in eternity. Life is the time to serve the Lord, there is no time left afterwards, and we don't any of us know how long we have left. This seems to have been a theme today. John 4:34, 5:19,36, 10:37, 17:4
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

9:14 We doubtless are aware that Jesus healed on the Sabbath much to the annoyance of the religious leaders. Here is a list of the occasions where the Sabbath day is recorded as the day when Jesus healed or taught. Matthew 12:1 Mark 1:21 2:23 3:2 6:2 Luke 4:16 31 6:1 6 7 13:10 14 14:3 John 5:9 here

10 The story about the sheepfold is actually a parable [10:6] We should not confuse the fact that we understand what Jesus was talking abut with the inability of Jesus' audience to understand. This was typical of his parables which were designed to make his audience think abut the message.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Notice the three fold, developing, acknowledgement that the man born blind had of Jesus
9:1 A man that is called Jesus
9:17 He is a prophet
9:33 If this man were not of God he could do nothing.

10:22 By telling us that we are now at the feast of dedication which is around December time we know that we are now only a few months - about 4 - from the crucifixion of Jesus.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

9:1 Notice the thematic link between 'passed by' and 8:59 'passed by. The healing of the blind man contrasts with the Jewish leaders who were 'blind' and not healed in the previous chapter.

10:33 Both here and 5:18 show that the Jewish leaders understood that Jesus came 'from God' but they misrepresented his claims. Rather than seeing him as 'that prophet' (Deuteronomy 18:15) speaking the words that He gave him they chose to portray Jesus as claiming equality - which he did not (Philippians 2:6-7)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
10:27  The theme through out this chapter is of hearing. (V.4) "know His voice" V.16 "shall hear my voice" We are also reminded of Paul's words "Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God"  Rom.10:17
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

9:27 We may well understand the annoyance of the Pharisees when the man who had been born blind asks 'will ye also be his disciples?' when we understand that the word 'disciple' means 'learner'. These were the learned men in Israel and now it is being suggested that they might learn from the carpenter's son!

10:41 Here is incidental proof that John preached rather than performed miracles. It is, therefore, the more astounding that his message was heeded by the people.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
10:3 Jesus knows his brethren by name (Luke 10:20).
In the Kingdom they will receive a new name (Rev 2:17, 3:12).
 
10:16 Jesus initially came to the Jews (Matt 15:24) but was destined also to go to the Gentiles (Matt 12:17-21).
Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

9:3       ‘neither hath this man sinned’ highlights that there is not a principle which dictates that  illness  is a direct consequence of sin. That some illnesses and conditions are a direct result of sin should not deceive us into thinking that if a person is ill then they have sinned.  With the increase of AIDS in society the point we learn here should warn us against jumping to snap conclusions.

 

10:19   The division among the Jews is something we have seen before – John 7:43, 9:16 The gospel challenges men, not all men will respond to the challenge.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
9:7 In spite of the strange character of the command, the blind man does exactly as he was directed to do. No protest, such as we witnessed when we read the account of Naaman. To the pool he goes, and washes the mud off his eyes. We witness that his obedience is immediately rewarded, he came back seeing. We have been provided with many examples of faith in scripture, but this has to be one of the greatest.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

9:1-7,33-38 - perhaps we have a man not being singled out for sinning but nevertheless born into sin (everyone is born into sin including the Pharisees who accused him of such v34) who had physical and spiritual blindness. Christ took advantage of a window of opportunity (just as current believers while still alive can share God's Word) to save his physical and more importantly spiritual blindness by intervening as he "spat" [Grk. "ptuo" (4429) means "to spit"] on the ground  and made clay (Rom 9:21 uses the same Grk word for clay and the inference is it represents our flesh being molded) of the spittle and then sent him to wash in the Pool of Siloam (Siloam means sent) so the man did so indicating faith on his part and perhaps suggesting baptism. After washing he could see so perhaps this represents the spiritual vision of hope beginning with belief and baptism in Christ. V35 we find he was thrown out of the synagogue (he was no longer under the inferior Law which Christ fulfilled Matt 5:17) and when asked if he believed in the Son of Man he sought to know more and then Christ encouraged him and made his vision even more complete v37-38. This Grk word "ptuo" (4429) "spit" is used two other times, always for healing, in Mark 7:33; 8:23. Another word for "spit" is the Grk. "emptuo" (1716) meaning "to spit in or on" and it is always used to show contempt Matt 26:67; 27:30; Mark 10:34; 14:65; 15:19; Luke 18:32.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

9:2-3Who did sin this man or his parents shows the way that Israel – and to a lesser extent we – view suffering. It is easy to look for a cause and effect relationship between suffering and sin. We know that there is not a direct relationship as did Jesus. However Jesus, rather than explaining the error of the disciples thinking moves straight into a more important issue. The event is for the glorification of God. We would do well to always focus on the big issue rather than the trivia we often consider.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
Jesus quoted from Psa 82:6 in John 10:32-36. He was able to explain that the Psalm called the Israelites “gods” because of the high and lofty calling they had received. They were of-course the highest of all nations. His point in John 10:34-38 is that as the Old Testament speaks of Israel as gods, surely Jesus himself is not blaspheming when he calls himself “the Son of God”.(Both words for God are the same Greek word, Theos.) Incidentally John 10:36 is a commentary on what he said in John 10:30, “I and my Father are one.”
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to David

10:5    The ‘stranger’ whose voice is not recognized is the teaching of the Scribes and Pharisees. Of course the ‘seep’ would have to already know the voice of the shepherd to be able to realise that the new voice being heard was not that of the shepherd. In like manner we cannot discern the voice of God or His son unless we are familiar with their voices. This will only come from being familiar with their words – that is by reading and reflecting on Scripture.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

9:22,34 The prospect of being put out of the synagogue was daunting. In a closely-knit community, overseen by an occupying force, an individual did not have many options. Not being allowed to worship in the synagogue was grist for the mill of public ostracism. It must be noted, also, that the officers of the synagogue wielded judicial power and, therefore, could make life difficult for someone who was out of their favor.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

Blind people rely more on audible information. But only those who admit to being blind. Those who do not, grope around in the dark because of pride (9:41). Notice that Jesus is speaking of the same thing in the next chapter, but disguises it by referring to sheep, not people (10:2-6) who follow only by hearing.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Rob

9:4 Jesus returns to the theme of walking and working in the ‘day’ in John 11:9 highlighting the need for activity when there is opportunity and it is appropriate to ‘walk’ – that is do God’s work.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

9:1-7 Jesus had just left the temple and encountered the man blind from birth. The Lord could have healed the man on the spot. Instead, He put a clay solution on his eyes and sent him to wash in the pool of Siloam.

The clay was significant of man's decaying constitution that could only be overcome by baptism (washing) through faith.

But the Pool of Siloam was not near the temple. It was situated to the south in the Lower City. This meant that the blind man would have to negotiate the narrow, busy streets half-way across town. That would indeed be a journey of faith. After successfully being guided to his journey's end he would be able to see perfectly.

We were blind from birth and doomed because of our disposition in Adam. Yet through belief, baptism, and a faithful walk, under guidance, we may yet be able to see perfectly in the Kingdom (1Cor 13:12).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

 

10:2,34 There was a common belief among the Jews that any misfortune was the result of sin. But, Jesus dispels such a notion (Luke 13:1-4).

10:18 The Greek word exousia is translated power (KJV) but could just as easily been translated authority. The ESV and other modern versions do translate it as authority. That takes the sting out of the Trinitarian claim that Jesus is God.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

The true followers of Jesus are those who hear him (10:3-4, 27-28). Pure and simple.

Do you remember science lessons at school? The teacher would explain the method for an experiment, write it out on the blackboard, or give you a book with it written down. All you needed to do was follow it, then you would do the experiment correctly. Simple. But how many times were your experiments a disaster?

The human temptation when listening is to add a little here, take a little away there, modify, bend, twist, and shake what we hear into what we want it to be.

I know someone who always complains about her oven. Cakes never come out right. They always sink or flop. But on closer inspection of her methods, I found she always reduced the sugar content, didn't preheat the oven, maybe modified the temperature setting and timing, put in less or more fruit, or used a different flour to the recipe. Recipes are meant to be followed, yet she would always say she'd followed the recipe. After a while she changed that oven but the cake still came out wrong!

So when following Jesus we need to resist the temptation to modify what he said, ignore the bits we don't like, or add ingredients. A recipe is written to be followed. If we do this, we can follow him to green pastures like the sheep in John 10:9.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

9:7 In the days of the Assyrian invasion Israel ‘refused the waters of Shiloah’ – 8:6– and now Jesus is telling the man to accept those same waters. It was God’s even though using it might have seemed to be rather futile. In the days of the prophet one might have thought there was more need of an army than water. For the man in Jesus’ day washing in water would not be seen as the obvious solution of a physical problem.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter