|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| 10
v. 11 - Notice how precise God is here with his language - that they may go
in. Not that you may go in, as God knew that Moses would not, even after all he
had done for the people. Deut.3:23-27,
9:18,25. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 10
v.3 'ark of Shittim
wood' is not the ark of the covenant spoken of in Exodus. It would appear that
Moses made a container for the tables of stones that he wrote the law on the second
time. 10 v.5 And so we might presume that the tables of stone were place inside the ark of the covenant, when the tabernacle was built, in the ark [box] that Moses had made for them at the first. 11 v.10 The idea of watering crops with their feet refers to the fact that irrigation of the crops in Egypt was effected using irrigation canals where water was diverted from the Nile and was pumped into the fields using foot powered water wheels. This contrasts with the land of Israel, where the fields were watered directly with the rain from heaven. The spiritual lesson is that in 'Egypt' man lived by his own strength whereas in 'Israel' man lives by God's provision. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 11v.7
- The fact that they had seen the great works of God with their own eyes gave
them a serious responsibility. We need to recognise too that the more we come
to recognise the great works which God has done onour behalf, the greater our
responsibility to follow Him really is. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
10:12
This language is the basis for the words of the prophet (Micah
6:8) in the context of the deliverance from Egypt. Yet another example of
the details of the wilderness journey being used as a lesson for later generations. 11:17 'that there be no rain' is a threat that God make to Israel if they were unfaithful. This is why Elijah (1 Kings 17:1) prayed that it would not rain. He doubtless hoped that that the drought would bring Israel to their senses as they realised that they were suffering because they were astray from God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| GETTING STRONG The quest for strength has been going on for centuries. From almost the beginning of time men have competed in games to see who is the strongest, fittest, fastest, bravest and best. It continues even today with sports tournaments, Olympics, Commonwealth Games and other events from local to international competitions. Yet with all the training and discipline that goes on in preparing for and competing in these events, most people forget or have not heard the secret of true strength. It is a simple secret but most people do not recognize it or refuse to accept it. Moses told Israel, "Observe therefore all the commands I am giving you today, so that you may have the strength to go in and take over the land that the LORD swore to your forefathers to give them and their descendants." Observing the commands of the LORD certainly will give us a different strength to that used in games, but it is a stronger and much more lasting strength with power beyond human imagination. Begin training today. Obey and be strong. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
10:17 The language from this verse is quoted (1 Timothy 6:15) to speak of the majesty of God - He hasn't changed from Old to New Testament. 11:14 When Yahweh told Israel that they would receive the first rain and the latter rain they would have had no idea what was being spoken of. In Egypt, where they had been for 215 years, does not have rain, let alone seasons of rain. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| ch
10 - The children of Israel were by nationality the descendants of Abraham,
but none the less God causes them to remember that they were strangers in the
Land of Egypt, "Love ye therefore the stranger for ye were strangers in Egypt"
(Deut
10:19). So the love of God is emphasised here, as God had loved them they
were also to love the stranger (a temporary inhabitant, a newcomer lacking inherited
rights). This is a teaching that seems to be regularly focused upon under the
Mosaic Law teaching the nation there was no room for nationalistic or self-righteous
pride and that God was no respecter of persons. This teaching pointed forward
to the new covenant that God would make with the house of Israel and the house
of Judah. But some Jewish believers in the New Testament who claimed to be Christians
but still upheld the Mosaic Law conveniently disregarded this part of the law
relating to strangers, and refused point blank to accept that God through the
Gospel of Grace "had opened the door of faith unto the Gentiles. This
high handed, nationalistic, unloving, self-righteous approach was to cause much
conflict in the first century ecclesias. The apostle had to deal with this problem
at Ephesus and in his usual indomitable way exhorted them Ephesians
2:12, That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the
commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having
no hope, and without God in the world: Ephesians
2:19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but
fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God. Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
10:22 the mention of 'threescore and ten souls; quotes (Exo 1:5) which was to remind those at the end of the wilderness journey the way in which God had blessed the family of Jacob since his arrival in Egypt - and that is despite the oppression of Egypt. 11:18 The binding of the words repeats the command of Moses (Deut 6:8) but this was not to be simply a ritual. 'between your eyes' meant that Israel were always to have the word in their sight. Readings the Word was not a mere ritual. It was their life. How do we view the daily readings? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
10:12 "What doth the LORD thy God require (request) of thee?"
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
Israel had to both obey the LORD and to love Him (10:12; 11:1). Duty alone is not sufficient to serve the LORD. Our service must also be an act of love as well as a duty (1Cor 13). Duty without love is not acceptable to the LORD. Israel is still jealously watched by the LORD today (11:12) 11:27,28 preview the larger treatise of blessings and curses found in Deut. 28. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| 10:8 It might seem a small thing to use the word ‘stand’ when speaking of the sons of Levi being chosen by God as priests. However it is just this point that Paul, speaking specifically about the high priest, contrasts the Mosaic order with Jesus – Heb 10:11-12 11:16 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Deut 10:17 God is impartial.... Acts 10:34 God doesn't show favoritism.... Rom 2:5-11 God will judge and reward each person according to what they have done be it on the day of God's wrath v5 or be it the bestowing of immortality v7.... James 2:1 we are not to show favoritism.... Rom 2:1-3; Matt 7:1-2 we are not to judge others Deut 11:26-28 - here we have 2 equations: obey = blessing, disobey = cursing Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
10:17 That God is not a respecter of persons is a repeated teaching in Scripture. Paul – 1Tim 6:15 – is one of the writers who picks up on this idea. On this occasions instructing Timothy who was responsible for the ecclesia in Ephesus. So this detail of the character of God has its application in the way in which we treat our brethren and sisters. Because God does not respect persons neither should we. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 11:14 The early rain came primarily during September and October, while the latter rain fell in the early spring of the year. There were occasional showers during the winter, but, the rains in the autumn and spring were the heaviest and the most important. The early rain was necessary, after a hot summer, to prepare the soil for the planting of the seed, and the latter rain, which preceded the harvest, was of the greatest value in the providing the powers of vegetation. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
11:24 The promise that everywhere where the ‘soles of your feet’ will tread will be ‘yours’ is the basis for the promise – Josh 3:13 – that when the priests stand in the river Jordan that the waters will be ‘cut off’. The Jordan typifies death. The entry into the land signified the resurrection. The promise in Deut 11:24, was typically fulfilled. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
11:29 Because of the acoustics of the landscape, the blessings and curses could be heard from both Mt. Gerizim and Mt. Ebal, and naturally everywhere in between. It was on Mt. Gerizim that the Samaritans set up their temple as a rival to that of Jerusalem. The present-day Samaritans, in Israel, still offer animal sacrifices, while religious Jews do not. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
10:5-6 We should be aware that there is a gap of about 38 years between these two verses. The incident of the stone tablets is at Sinai near the beginning of the wilderness journey whereas the death of Aaron took place in the 40th year of their time in the wilderness. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
10:2 Yahweh’s Word can never be silenced. Men have tried but have failed. For example, Jehoiakim tried to destroy it, but it was re-written (Jer 36:23,32). The Catholic Church did not want people to read the Bible for themselves. They tried to stop William Tyndale (1494-1536) from publishing and distributing his new translation of the Bible. The Church murdered Tyndale but this did not stop what he started. Others followed Tyndale until King James authorized the 1611 version. Today, the KJV and other versions are freely read by anyone. The Word of God cannot be stopped. This, surely, is proof of the Living God who oversees all things. 10:14 the phrase the heaven and the heaven of heavens is used to show the vastness of Yahweh’s creation beyond the limitations of the earth. 11:14 the first (early) rain is in fall/winter; and the latter rain is in spring. 11:17 The withholding of rain will also occur in the Kingdom for negligent nations (Zech 14:17). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
Either Moses was a very strong man, or the tablets of stone were a little smaller than we might imagine them (10:3) Did you know that Moses pleaded with God for 40 days, fasting and lying on the ground? (10:10, 9:18,25) Question: (11:2-7) How can Moses be speaking to the original generation who lived in Egypt, if God had destroyed them in the wilderness? (Num 32:13) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
| Deut 10:18-19 - God cares for the alien/stranger and we should love them as well (Lev 19:18;Luke 10:25-37). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
10:10 Having spoken about the journeying of Israel and the death of Aaron which took place in the 40th year of the wilderness journey Moses now returns to speak of what happened at Sinai when he was given the two tables of the law at the beginning of the wilderness journey. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.2
- This hatred of life comes directly from the considerations of how vain it is,
and yet there is only hope of coming to God while we are still alive, so let us
make the best of what we have. ch.2:17,
9:4-6, Job 3:17-21. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 4:4
'travail' - Ecclesiastes
1:13 2:23,26 3:10 4:4,6,8 5:14 'vexation of spirit' - Ecclesiastes
1:14,17 2:11,17,26 4:4,6,16 6:9 speaks of the emptiness and futility of life
when Yahweh is not seen in life's experiences. Those who comprised faithless Israel
were to experience this when the faithful were blessed. Isaiah
65:14 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.6
picks up a theme that has run throughout Proverbs (15:16,17,
16:18, 17:1 see also Psa.37:16). Perhaps a lesson the those who seek a 'life
of adventure'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| The
whole depressing chapter is not speaking of the expectations of the child of God.
It is only those with no hope who share the misery described in this chapter.
The brother or sister in Christ should not feel like this. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| STRESS OR TRANQUILITY In today's modern world everyone seems to be after the top jobs. To stay on the top we need cell phones, e-mail, pagers and fast cars. We run around like mad things trying to keep up and advance our careers. But with all this running around, tight deadlines, the demand for more, for precision and economy, comes the biggest killer of the human race - stress. From what I have seen, it doesn't matter how much stress we put up with, as long as we can earn the big money and advance our career, it is said to be worth it. But it is not. Solomon was right when he said, "Better one handful with tranquility than two handfuls with toil and chasing after the wind." If we aim for the top and put all our energy into getting rich (or, as the preacher puts it, getting two handfuls) we will find ourselves stressed to the max, and when we look over our lives later on, we will find that it has all been a waste of time - a chasing after the wind. But if we content ourselves with a little less (the one handful), we also find we will gain tranquility. With the blessing of tranquility we will also find that we have time for God. We will be able to get close to him and find peace and a place in God's kingdom. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
| :6
How true this statement is. So often we strive for 'things' only to discover
that those 'things' bring with them their own problems. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| In vs.
8; The first thing that a covetous man desires is to have no one close to
him, this man "heaps up riches and knoweth not who shall gather them"(Psa
39:6;) This man has no room for friendship for he does not reflect that loving
and kindly disposition that gains friends. Instead of using his fortune wisely,
he hoards it and this causes his heart to despair. The pursuit and preoccupation
of wealth does not satisfy and draws us away from God, Jesus picks this up in
contrast to being preoccupied with following him Matthew
16:26; For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world,
and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
The Mammon man who loses his soul is so bound up with his wealth that he severs
his connection with those around him and their activities. Jesus again said in
relation to this kind of attitude, Matthew
6:21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
In regard to this way of thinking let us take to our selves Solomons qualified
advice, This is also vanity, yea it is a sore travail. Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
| 4:12 This seeming natural statement 'a threefold cord is not easily broken' develops 'in the mouth of two or three witnesses' Deut 17:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.9-12 Two are better than one Two can accomplish more work together than singly; they can help one another in difficulties; they can keep one another warm while spending a cold night in the open; they can better resist bandits. Still greater is the strength of a cord in which three strands are entwined. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
| ENVY "You shall not covet," is like the bookend of the Ten Commandments. With the mastery of the commandment against coveting, many of the others will largely fall into place. Much of the reason to steal, to lie or to commit adultery will evaporate if only we would learn not to covet. It is when we look around at the things our neighbour has that we get envious, because it always looks as if they have so much more than we have. In reality though, our neighbour is probably looking over the fence at us and wishing that they had what we have got. But why can't we just learn to be content with what we have been given? Surely it is better to give thanks for the blessings God gives us than to wear both ourselves and God down with continual grumbling and asking for more. The teacher saw the same thing. He says, "And I saw that all labour and all achievement spring from man's envy of his neighbour. This too is meaningless, a chasing after the wind." (Ecc 4:4) Even though we know it is wrong, we still get caught up in the rat race - coveting, envying and working with the aim of improving our status. Let's get out of that meaningless state and give ourselves real meaning to live by. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
| Solomon builds up an idea, starting with one, then to two, and then to three (Ecc 4:9-12). Two people get more done than one working alone; he can help his fellow in the case of an accident; they can gain heat from each other; and one can protect the other one. But a threefold cord is not quickly broken. So it is in our ecclesial work. Being on the side of God and Christ is a real blessing. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
4:7 On a number of times Solomon ‘returned’. We might ask where he returned from and where he returned to. He returned from looking at men and women in the kingdom of Israel to go to the house of God. It was in the house of God that he saw the ‘vanity’ of this life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
4:8 That man is not satisfied with what he sees is a point that Solomon returns to – Ecc 5:10 – If only we could learn that we will never be satisfied with things that this life can offer. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Extremes are discouraged. Neither being a workaholic (v.4) nor being indolent (v.5) is acceptable. A balance between the two opposites is recommended (v.6) Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
4:2-3 This depressing comment upon life and death can only be true of those who do not see God at work n their lives. Those who recognise God s at work in their lives have hope. Those who do not do not have hope. So we must recognise this seemingly pointless existence only has meaning when viewed against the background of the Gospel message. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.9-12 The preacher describes the advantage of two working together. Nevertheless, exceptionally single-minded persons have chosen to be alone for the sake of the Truth. Jesus is the prime example. Paul also chose that route and wished that all could be like him (for the Truth’s sake) (1Cor 7:7). However, Paul allowed for the fact that most people are not like him, thus he recommended marriage (1Cor 7:9). And so, for most people, the preacher is right that two are better than one. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
KEEPING UP WITH THE JONES' My brother in law just had a conversation with his son. His seven year old son wanted a cup of pepermint tea. Why did he want it? He wanted pepermint tea because his younger brother had a cup of pepermint tea. "So," my brother in law asked, "What would you have if Henry didn't have pepermint tea?" His son responded, "Juice." Even as a seven year old, my nephew had a desire to keep up with the people around him. If someone else had something, then he should have it too. That desire does not dissappear. It may become more subtle as we get older, but if we look around at our peers, we will see that we all have similar standards of lifestyle and possessions. Few of us are left behind because, like it or not, we aim to keep up with those around us. The Teacher saw this trend when he said, "And I saw that all labor and achievement spring from man's envy of his neighbor. This too is meaningless, a chasing after the wind." (Ecc 4:4) Let's take note of the motivation we have when we next go out to gain bigger, better, or more possessions. Are we doing it because we need it? Or are we gaining more just because it is what everyone else is doing or we need to keep up with our living standards? Do all to the glory of God. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
|
4:8 The ‘sore travail’ harks back to Solomon’s comment in Ecc 1:13 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Vs.9-12 No follower of Christ should ever be alone and unaided. It is the duty each disciple of Christ to support fellow brothers and sisters (Gal 6:2; 1John 3:17). Vs.13,14 Solomon might have been thinking about David. He was virtually in prison under duress from Saul. Eventually, David came out of poverty to wealth and power. He took over from Saul, a king who would not be admonished. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
|
4:9-12 There is a fundamental principle that two are better than one - Gen 2:18 – which provides the basis for fellowship. Fellowship helps us deal with the knocks of life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.
3 - These proofs are recorded for us as well. If you have an on line Bible,
you can call up no less than 141 references to this verse, mostly of times when
it is recorded that the disciples received some proof of his resurrection. We
have this written proof as we too, like them, speak of things pertaining to the
kingdom for which we wait. Rom.14:17,
Col.1:13, 1Thes.2:12 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.
6 The disciples question
'Wilt thou at this time restore the kingdom to Israel ...' is set against
v. 3 'To whom
also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being
seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom
of God:' The disciples saw the restoration of the kingdom to Israel as things
pertaining to the kingdom of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.18-25
Peter's comments here about the demise of Judas seem at variance with what Matthew
tells us (Matthew
27:3-5). There is no contradiction. Peter, in Acts, is giving an Old Testament
exposition of the Scriptures which foretold his demise. 1:16
'scripture must needs have been fulfilled'.
Peter quotes a number of passages from the Old Testament linking Judas with both Balaam and Ahithophel.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| :1
Acts, written by Luke under inspiration, is a companion in particular to Luke's
account of the gospel. :1-2
makes this point clear. We should, therefore, expect to see themes from Luke continue
into Acts. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| God has left us
in no doubt about the qualifications of the twelve apostles, obviously foreseeing
there would be some who claimed to be apostles and were not. Before the lot was
cast for the one to replace Judas. The apostle Peter quoted Psalm
109:8; after which he went on to say, Acts
1:21,22; Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the
time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism
of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained
to be a witness with us of his resurrection. Their personal witness of the
ressurction of Jesus underpins the whole of the book of Acts and the last instruction
that Jesus gave the twelve was Ye shall be witnesses unto me no one
else but the twelve apostles were qualified to undertake this commission. Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.4 The Apostles are waiting in Jerusalem as they were directed to do Luke 24:49 until they were "endued with power from on high" This was what Luke identifies as "the promise of the Father" The Holy Spirit would perfect their understanding. John 14:16; 26 So they could be witnesses both in Jerusalem, (Acts 2) and unto the uttermost part of the earth.(Acts 10) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
1:23-26 It may be argued that the example of the apostles here shows us that we should cast lots to appoint our serving brethren. However I do not feel that this follows.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| As we eagerly await the return of our Lord from heaven (v.11), we should continue in unity of hope and purpose (v.14). We should use our energy to live each day as if it were the last (Matt 6:34) rather than trying to pinpoint times or dates from prophecy (v.7; Matt 24:42). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.8 In the state the disciples were in at that time, knowing little of the Divine Plan and Purpose, it was very essential for them to have the Holy Spirit. This would give them power which was contained in nine spiritual gifts. These are detailed by Paul in 1Cor 12:8-10. The power which such gifts would give them would be great. They would be able to use this power at will, but it appears that Peter was very conscious of his imperfection and ften sought the Divine Blessing in prayer before using the Power. Jesus told the disciples that "the Holy Spirit would bring all things to your remembrance, whatso ever I have said unto you." John 14:26 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
1:15 In speaking of the disciples as ‘names’ we see an application of Isa 56:6 where people will be given a name. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.18 "reward of iniquity" A reward of death, and a return to the earth. There is here an undersigned coincidence here, and it shows Lukes's accuracy and attention to detail. Peter uses this expression during this address, which has been recorded for us. Years later we find Peter using it again; "reward of unrighteousness" (2Pet 2:13) and again in V.18 "wages of unrighteousness" John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
When Jesus left the disciples after 40 days, a great feeling of loneliness and isolation must have crept over them. The feeling I get from v12-13 is that they stole quietly back into the city, and went to a private upper room. There it says they "continued with one accord in prayer". That's a wonderful picture of them taking comfort in their unity. Here they kept the Lord among them in prayer and by constant reference to him. They would have discussed what he had told them over the last 40 days, and no doubt their hearts had burned within them (Luke 24:32). But there was a sadness and unease among them. Jesus had gone, rather without warning, whilst they had hoped he would set up the Kingdom of Israel (v6). This was why Jesus had promised them a "comforter". His purpose with them had not yet fully sunk in, having only just got to grips with him rising from the dead. There may have been fear too of the enormity of what Jesus seemed to be asking them. He had asked them to speak of him throughout the world, and through persecution and trial and opposition. They knew only too well how fierce the Jewish leaders could become when provoked. Did they have to lay their lives on the line as Jesus had done? And so we come to a vivid picture of our own life in the assembly of those waiting for Jesus. We have a job to do, but so often we feel so helpless, insecure, and afraid that we find ourselves just gathering together and speaking of Jesus, and waiting. But this is precisely what we should do. Jesus had commanded his followers to remain together in Jerusalem, and he had commanded them to Love one another. When the time came it was he who provided them with the wherewithal to preach. He who moved events to cause them to carry it throughout the world. He who comforted them through it. And he who provided them with the words to say. Sometimes we can forget that it is Jesus who is responsible both for us, and for the tasks we will carry out in his name. We should take courage and believe that, in his good time, he will provide us each with the wherewithal to do what he asks of us. We don't always know how he will do this, or when, and likely it will be on a small scale. But this we do know, that in the meantime we should gather together and wait for him. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||
| Acts 1:18-19 It is possible that Luke in this passage, and Matthew in Matt 27:3-10 are talking about different fields, even though the nickname for them was the same. In Matthew the priests buy the field, with the 30 pieces of silver, and the purpose is as a burial place for gentiles. In Acts, we are told that Judas bought the field with the reward of his iniquity and that he committed suicide there. Perhaps the reward of his iniquity is linked to John 12:6 where we are told that he was a thief. Perhaps he invested his takings in real estate. So the 1st field is so named because it was bought with blood money, and the 2nd because of the death that occurred there. Perhaps the priests bought Judas' field after his death, (as they may not have had time to spend the 30 pieces of silver right away), and used it for a burial place for gentiles, as it was fit for no other purpose. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||||||||||
1:3 I find it difficult to imagine what it must have been like to spend time talking to a person who had been dead and was now alive forever. But this was the experience of the disciples. They were truly blessed by that experience However there is also a blessing for those who have not had that experience – John 20:29 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Luke now commences his second letter to Theophilus. He has a wonderful story to tell of how the Word was preached “in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth” (Acts 1:8). It’s interesting that Jesus had chosen 12 disciples. Why? Probably because there were 12 tribes of Israel, and this new Christian gospel was based on the promises to Abraham. Peter and the others now pray, and think it appropriate to elect a 12th man, to replace the evil Judas Iscariot, and God chooses Matthias. But we don’t hear anything further about him.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
Matt 27:5 records simply that Judas hanged himself. Here in v.18 a more graphic description of Judas' demise is given. Judas, it appears, botched his own hanging. Probably the rope gave way sending him crashing down. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
1:7 Just as it was not for the disciples to know ‘the times and the seasons’ we do not need to know them either. Our hope is not based upon the nearness of Jesus’ return even though this is an important element of our hope. It is based on the fact that God raised Jesus from the dead and forgiveness of sins is available through him. Notice, as you read through Acts, how often the resurrection is mentioned. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Luke is clearly the writer of acts and the companion of Paul in the missionary field. His reference to the former treatise to his friend, or patron, or student Theophilus is, of course, Luke’s Gospel writings. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
V.11 records that Jesus ascended into heaven and promises that He will return. Moreover, it records that the manner of return will be the same as the ascension. The Lord ascended from a place near Bethany, on the side of the Mount of Olives away from Jerusalem (Luke 24:50; John 11:18): not from the top of the Mount of Olives as some suppose. His ascension was a private affair which could not be seen by those in Jerusalem. Likewise, His return will be surreptitious. He will gather His people (spiritual Israel), and after judgement, He will manifest Himself on the Mount of Olives, with great fanfare, to save natural Israel (Zech 14:3,4). If you would like a brief outline of Jesus' return and subsequent events, please e-mail me for Return of Jesus and End-time Prophecy. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
1:1 We met ‘Theophilus’ in Luke 1:3 where he is called ‘most excellent ...’. This description is reserved for Roman dignitaries – Acts 23:26– so maybe by the time Paul sent Acts to him he had become a brother in Christ and so Luke did not feel the need to use the Roman title. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
v 3-6 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Restored Israel to be God's Kingdom Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
V.12 a sabbath’s day journey is seven-and-one-half furlongs. Josephus reckons that the Mount of Olives is but five furlongs from Jerusalem. And so, Jesus’ ascension was on the down slope of the mountain away from Jerusalem. Bethany was fifteen furlongs from Jerusalem. But the region of Bethany began seven-and-one half furlongs from Jerusalem. The region of Bethphage also began seven-and one-half furlongs from Jerusalem. It is where these two regions met that Jesus ascended into heaven. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
v6 First Principles>Sure Mercies of David>Government Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||
|
DEMOCRACY VERSES CASTING LOTS Democracy rules! This modern and ungodly trend of decision making has even been picked up by the church. In my church decisions as to leaders, speakers and a number of other appointments are all made by popular vote. It appears that doing things the way the early disciples did - by casting lots - is leaving a little too much to chance! Let's take a look at the prayer the apostles prayed before they chose the last apostle to take the place of Judas. "Then they prayed, 'Lord, you know everyone's heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen to take over this apostolic ministry which Judas left to go where he belongs.'" (Acts 1:24-25) The next thing the apostles did was to cast lots. (v.26) My question is this: Which method of decision making leaves more to chance? Do we leave the decision to a multitude of people, many of whom have little knowledge of a character or an issue, and some who have no interest in what they are voting for at all? Do we leave the decisision to people who can be bribed or swayed by something as simple as a pursuasive speech? Or do we let God guide the decision knowing that he alone knows everyone's hearts, can see their circumstances and knows the end from the beginning? Casting lots has the guidance of God. Democracy is a gamble. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
1:6 A Jew would understand that the kingdom of God had existed on the earth before. A roman official probably would not appreciate the significance of that so Luke advises Theophilus of this element of the apostles’ expectations by recounting one of the many things they must have said to Jesus after the resurrection. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||