|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.5
- Deuteronomy is full of these reminders to stay on track in order to receive
the blessings promised. This so obviously applies to us in our situation under
the New Covenant too. If they needed such constant reminders, surely we do too.
ch.4:9,
11:13-15, 28:1-15, Lev.26:3-13, Josh.1:7, Phil.1:27. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
shows us that the release - the jubilee - the consequent rest in Jesus - is just
for those who are part of the body. There are quite a number of laws of this sort
which have one rule for the people and another for the stranger. In a picture
this is showing us the freedom we have in Christ. Consider Jesus' question to
Peter in Matt.17:25-26
and the deeper contrast made in John
8:35 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:4
Whilst provision was made for the time when there were no 'poor' among Israel
they would always have 'the poor' because of the fact that they could not keep
the law. Jesus knew that this was so. (Matthew
26:11 Mark 14:7 John 12:8) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :8
Whilst the law made specific provision as to how the Israelite was to behave it
could not legislate for attitude of mind. So there is the warning 'beware
'
(:9).
Our service to our God must not be grudging (2
Corinthians 9:7) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:9 'and it be sin unto you' shows that refraining from helping when a need is seen is wrong. This forms the basis for James 4:17. The way Israel were to treat their brothers is a basis for life in Christ. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.7 Moses exhorts the Children of Israel to give in a liberal spirit of charity and kindness; This we are told from Paul's writings that God loves a cheerful giver. Rom 12:8; 2 Cor 9:7 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
A Hebrew man or woman became a servant voluntarily (v.12). After serving six years there was freedom and much blessing (vs.13,14). We too have become voluntary servants of the Lord and look forward to the seventh year, the Sabbath rest, when we will be abundantly blessed. Notice that this blessing applied only to covenanted servants of Yahweh. And so too, the blessings that Jesus will bring will only be given to His brethren and not to strangers (even if those strangers claim to be followers of His). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
One of the laws from God was that the firstborn males of the animals must not be used for farm work, but must be eaten by its owners in the place that God would choose (Deut 15:19-23). This would ensure that everyone would be reminded that the firstborn was God's.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
15:9 This law which commanded generosity did not command the degree to which generosity as to be shown. The degree to which generosity was to be shown was determined, not by the giver but by the need of the recipient. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.10-11 - though many of us are surrounded by materialistic me first climates, we are to give generously and without a grudging heart; there will always be poor people in the land but we are to be openhanded to our brethren and others; Some people quote Matt 26:11 with the suggestion that generously giving to the poor is almost like throwing money away because the poor are always going to be arround and we can't realistically solve all their problems but the intent of Matt as seen by the expansion in Deut is not to be stingy, in fact, quite the opposite. An additional application/interpretation is there are the spiritually poor who need help and we all should be openhanded and generous with our time/teaching/encouragment in helping them and by doing so we all become stronger spiritually. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
15:9 The requirement that the Israelite should show generosity ‘for the poor shall never cease …’ demonstrates that Israel’s generosity was not so that poverty could be removed from the nation. Rather the point is being made that no matter how generous they were towards their poor brethren they would not be able to solve the problem of poverty. In like manner today we should realise that the solution to world poverty is not to be found through individual or national giving – as good and generous as that is. Poverty will only be removed when Christ returns. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| TIME TO CANCEL DEBTS When Jesus was asked about the meaning of forgiveness, he told a parable about two men who owed money. One was a rich man who was owed an amount impossible for his debtor to repay. He cancelled the debt and his debtor was forgiven. The other, (who was also the forgiven debtor) refused to forgive the man who owed him a small amount of money and threw him into prison. When the rich man heard of this, he cancelled the cancellation of the debt owed and threw the man into prison to be tortured until he had paid all he owed. Jesus concluded, "This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother from the heart." (Matt 18:35) With this connection between forgiveness and cancelling debts, we can see a wonderful principle by which we should live. God told Israel, "At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts." (Deut 15:1) He then proceeds to explain how it should be done. We need to put this principle into practice and ensure we regularly forgive any grudges we might be holding against anybody. If it is over than seven years old, forget it! Better still if we clean our grudge slate each year, each month, each week or every day. However often we do it, let's make sure we do not hold on to old debts or sins that need forgiving. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
15:11 Clearly the generous spirit of the Jews towards their brethren was not designed to relive poverty in totality for ‘the poor shall never cease out of the land’ So the giving was, primarily, for the benefit of the spiritual development of the giver. This point is developed by Paul in 2Cor 9:6-7 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Yahweh cautions His people against the natural human tendencies to be greedy, resentful and manipulative. At all times, fellow Hebrews must be helped, and not just when it is convenient. Gratitude for the grace that Yahweh had shown His people must be the underlying motivation. Therefore, joyous giving is required. Also, as an expression of love and respect, the best products were to be presented to Yahweh (v.21). Unfortunately, negative human inclinations subsequently won out and the Jews forgot their God (Jer 34:13-16; Mal 1:7,8). True followers of Jesus must also have the right attitude towards God and their fellow man. The best should always be presented before Yahweh, and concern for the welfare of brethren and strangers should always be shown (Phil 2:4). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:10 It was not simply a matter of relieving the poor. The provision of the details of the year of release were for the benefit of the giver. That his mind might become like that of his God. He was not to be grieved in his giving. He was to be a ;’cheerful giver’ –2Cor 9:7 – not even expecting repayment of the debt – Luke 6:30-34 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.15 bondman (KJV) is translated from the Hebrew ebed which means servant (slave). You might recall Ebed-melech who helped Jeremiah (Jer 38:7-9). Although his name sounds like a proper name it was probably just descriptive of his station because his name means servant of the king. V.21 Israel would later forget to honor Yahweh with the best of the flock. They thought: Why should we bring the best to be sacrificed, they are only going to be destroyed. Let’s keep the best for ourselves and bring the inferior animals to be burned in sacrifice. They considered sacrifice to Yahweh a weary exercise, but Yahweh was not amused (Mal 1:13,14). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
15:1 The year of release had already been described and its provision laid out in Lev 25:4-7 but can hardly imagine there being year of release every seven years in the wilderness and if there had been it would only have dealt with people and not land. Now Israel are about to cross Jordan into their inheritance it is important that the whole extend of the provision be laid out again. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2,3
- Usually it is easy to see the wisdom of Solomon's words, even if it is not easy
to keep it! but here we need to investigate what is really meant. The word sorrow
is elsewhere termed affliction, and this starts to make more sense of it. Some
passages in Psalms make this clear for us - 119:67,71,
126:5,6. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
5 'Rebuke' is the correct
way to deal with error. Leviticus
19:17 But there is
no point rebuking one who has no respect for the Word of God Proverbs
9:8 The rebuke of the
wise is to be heeded. Therefore we must asses the wisdom on the one who speaks
to us. Ecclesiastes
7:5 This instruction
from the Old Testament forms the basis for the warnings and exhortations in the
New Testament. 1
Timothy 5:20 2 Timothy 4:2 Titus 1:13 2:15 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.4
- continuing the theme from v.2,3
discussed above - we see that the way of the godless is to enjoy this life, as
he has nothing else. We mourn of this life because of its imperfections and look
forward instead to that to come, where all will be peace and righteousness. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Notice
the repeated refrain that certain things are 'better'
7:1 2 3 [twice] 5 8 and finally a warning that we should not view the 'former days as 'better' - this is the basis of man's depression. Human nature is such that it always thinks of the things it no longer has as more appealing than what is currently available. Israel were like this in the wilderness - we remember (Numbers 11:5) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :28
Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1
Kings 11:3) - and they turned him away from God so his comment here is a comment
Solomon made about his own actual experience. The problem was in the choice that
he made. In Scripture women stand for teaching - either 'wisdom' or 'error' -
we must be aware that there are more 'strange women' than there is 'wisdom'! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:4 Whilst this counsel seems at variance with how we might feel life should be it is doubtless correct. It is 'those who mourn' that will be 'comforted' (Matthew 5:4) which is a mourning for the abominations done in Zion Isa 61:2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.29 It appears that Solomon had the Genesis record of creation in mind as he penned these words. The fault for man's corruption is not God's. Man was made "very good," but have sought out many inventions. (or devices of their own heart.) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Solomon had a thousand wives and concubines. He knew all of these intimately. In all of these women he could not find one who was upright (v28-29). In v26 he explains that the most bitter thing in life, even worse than death itself, is a woman whose heart is snares and nets. He of all people knew this to be true, because he was the one who had wisdom and glory from God, yet fell from grace through the subtelties of the women he loved (1Kin 11:1-6). The word snares means the same as Rebekah. It is with her that we see the character trait he is referring to. In Gen 27:1-17 Rebekah devises a plan in order to deceive her husband. Having done that, she then deceives him again in vs 45-46 by concocting a story based on half truth in order to undo the damage she has done with the first deceit. Even though we can say that she had the best motives, we can categorically say that deceit is always wrong, and always displeases God. His very character testifies to truth, and nothing but the truth. The same character trait is found in Eve, who for the best motives, so it seems, persuaded Adam to sin. Women are of course very persuasive to men. Even the great Solomon in all his wisdom and splendour was unable to stop himself being swayed to do wrong. The correct word for it is subtelty, and is opposite to uprightness. Solomon is stating in Ecclesiastes that he has found in every single woman he has met a propensity to this character trait. When we think of the women he is referring to, however, we realise why this is. His thousand wives were largely from idol worshipping nations. It seems from v26 that these wives had deliberately set out to seduce him into their form of worship. Had Solomon chosen his wives more wisely, he would not have had to write these verses at all. Had he chosen more wisely, his wives might have mustered all their persuasion instead to keeping him in God's ways (Prov 31:10-12) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
V.10 There are people who long for the good old days as they nostalgically reminisce. There is nothing good about any of the days we have lived or are living. We should be future-oriented (Phil 3:14) and take one day at a time (Matt 6:34). It is not where we have been but where we end up that is important. V.20 Being just or righteous does not mean being sinless. A righteous person is one who falls, realizes his error, corrects it, and moves on (Prov 24:16). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
V.18 "he that feareth God shall come forth of them all" shall escape all such extremes Prov 3:7 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Anger, says Solomon, remains with you for a long time (Ecc 7:9). Dare I suggest that for much of our life there is no need to “get angry”? Of-course situations sometimes demand it, and even Jesus Himself showed anger a few times. If we ignore insults, and walk away from people who are making us cross, and really try to love our enemies - then “anger” can be reduced to a minimum. See Prov 15:1. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
7:9 ‘Be not hasty to be angry’ is the basis of the exhortation and warning found in James 1:19 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.12 - wisdom is contrasted with money with a major difference being that wisdom gives life to those who possess it. Note how 'knowledge' is just before the second mention of 'wisdom' in this verse. We have to have knowledge (Prov 1:7; Hos 4:6) of God's word and then wisely (2Tim 3:15) apply it to have a hope of eternal life. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
7:12 Today’s materialistic society would have us believe that the possession of money solves all problems, as if one can buy one’s way out of problems. However money cannot give eternal life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:7 The two features described here both relate to the way in which a man many be prevailed upon to give a judgement that differs from what he knows to be right. ‘oppression’ is a threat of some action. The ‘gift’ is a bribe. Exo 23:8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The preacher seems morbid in his view of life and death. But life is a serious business. Without the ability and willingness of the LORD to change humankind’s miserable situation, all are headed for oblivion. Fortunately, in His mercy, the LORD has provided a way of salvation, through the Lord Jesus (Acts 4:12). Without Him, there is no hope (Eph 2:12; Titus 1:2). The prospect of life or death should, therefore, lend gravity to the thinking, caring person. James expresses this (James 4:8-10). Fools will follow every path of frivolity in search of present enjoyment. Let us eat and drink for tomorrow we die is their mantra. But those who trust in the LORD will see a better day (Psa 37:34). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:13-15 The book of Ecclesiastes is making the point that God is at work in the lives of those who are ‘wise’ rather than trying to resist the Hand of God in our lives we should be willing to recognise His hand at work and take His correction. The whole objective in our lives is to submerge our will that it might become the will of the Father. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.2-4 Too much merriment can prevent a person from reflecting the serious things surrounding life. Facing death brings sobriety. That experience allows one to reflect about his/her life in order to bring changes for the better. V.9 is echoed in James 1:19. V.14 God is the creator of both good and evil (Isa 45:7). The phrase find nothing after him means that man can find nothing to blame after he has considered God’s work. V.28 Solomon speaks from experience. He had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1Kin 11:3). His wives turned him to idolatry (1Kin 11:4,5). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Ecc 7:20;Rom 3:10-12. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
7:10 Selective memory is a fault we all share. We tend to forget the evil things of the past and only remember the good – it was always hot and sunny in the school holiday when I was young – we tend to think. Rather the thinking of Jacob at the end of his life is more appropriate – Gen 48:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 5
v. 29 - We do not often find ourselves in a position of conflict like this
where there is a choice between obedience to men or to God, but when we do, there
should be no doubt of our actions. To stand up, as these folk did, blatantly denying
the power of the law of the land in favour of the ways of God, requires a great
deal of courage and conviction. Would we be ready if faced with this? Acts
4:19, Gen.3:17, 1Sam.15:24, Mark 7:7-9, Rev.14:8-12. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5 v.2 The word 3557 keep back Acts 5:2,3 is translated 'purloin' Titus 2:10 which shows that we can behave in a way similar to Ananias and Sapphira. 5 v.32 The disciples are told that they are witnesses to God's work with Jesus Luke 24:48 Which point they are not slow to point out in their preaching. Acts 1:8 22 2:32 3:15 4:33 5:32 10:39 41 13:31 22:15 26:16 6 v.3 The word 'ordain' 2525 can be seen, from its use in the New Testament, to encompass rulership and judgment. Matthew 24:45,47 25:21,23 (made) ruler Luke 12:14,42,44 (made) judge / rule Acts 6:3 7:10,27,35 appoint / made Acts 17:15 conducted Romans 5:19 made Titus 1:5 ordain Hebrews 2:7 5:1 7:28 8:3 set / ordained / maketh James 3:6 4:4 is 2 Peter 1:8 make The use in the epistles indicates that, when appointment was made, it was at the father's instigation, not man's. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
5:41 Would we rejoice if we were persecuted and beaten? I suspect that many of us would try to hide our faith. The gospel and the certainty of the resurrection of Jesus had certainly changed these men. 6:3 The counsel to the ecclesia in Jerusalem echoes what Jethro told Moses (Deuteronomy 1:13). Indeed it is a good principle to use in Ecclesial life today. Brethren should not try to control things by holding on to power. Rather brethren and sisters must be involved in decision making. We will return to this point when we come to this chapter again later in the year. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch 5 - The behaviour of Ananias and Sapphira shows a complete lack of understanding of Proverbs 21:27 6:7 In telling us that 'a great number of priests believed' a potential problem would raise itself. They had just been discussing matters of welfare and having resolved it they were faced with a great multitude who were now out of work. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 5:28 "in this name" Note that the Sanhedrin does not name the "name" He does not say "the name of Jesus of Nazareth". This is not reverence as is usually the case in Hebrew usage, but a desire not to refer to the Lord, either out of hatred for Him, or a fear that they be taking the name of God in vain, not that they thought Jesus might be God, but that God's Works had been manifested by and through Him. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
5:1 When Ananias and Sapphira 'kept back' 3557 part of the cost we learn that we can behave similarly for the same word (only used on this occasion outside Acts 5) is translated 'purloining'(Titus 2:10) which we can see may apply to us in our daily lives. 6:9 The disputing of these against Stephen matched the 'murmuring' of the Grecians against the Hebrews for those who disputed with Stephen were also Grecians. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Holding back service from the LORD does not seem to have the immediate and severe consequences that it did for Ananias and Sapphira. Their judgement was momentous and dramatic. Nevertheless, the LORD is taking stock of our progress which will be revealed in the day of judgement. He has no pleasure in those who do not keep their promises (Ecc 5:4,5). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
5:1 The mention of the deceit and greed of Ananias and Sapphira immediately after the actions of Barnabus (4:37) is designed to force us to see the contrast. The chapter division is unhelpful here. 6:1 The first problem the ecclesia had to deal with was related to the care of widows. This was a major concern in the wilderness Deut 24:17, :19-21. So it is not surprising that James (1:27) addresses this issue in his letter Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 5:34-39 It must not be thought that Gamaliel in his speech excused the Sanhedrin. What he achieved was, to supply for them a way to escape from a dilemma which threatened to engulf them. They saw an easy way out and took it. The incident is a lesson in the vanity of human beings who will not yield a point even when they know they are wrong. Even when they were shown that they were wrong before God, they did not yield. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
| RIGHT PLACE, RIGHT TIME The apostles had been put into jail by the Saducees, a group of people that included the high priest. "But during the night an angel of the Lord opened the doors of the jail and brought them out." (Acts 5:19) As they were released from the prison they were given a specific commandment: "Go, stand in the temple courts ... and tell the people the full message of this new life." (v.20) We need to take note that this is exactly what the apostles did. "At daybreak they entered the temple courts, as they had been told, and began to teach the people." (v.21) Daybreak was the time of the morning sacrifice. It should have been, then, that the paths of the apostles and of the high priest should have crossed, both being in the same place at the same time. In fact, the events that were to follow could have been extremely embarrassing for the high priest. The high priest and his associates sent to the jail to get the apostles, but were surprised when the apostles were not found locked up where they should have been. They were told, "Look! The men you put in jail are standing in the temple courts teaching the people." (v.25) Surely, if the apostles had been in the temple the whole morning, they should have been seen by the priest or at least one of his associates. But unlike the apostles, the priests were not where they were supposed to be, nor doing what they were supposed to be doing.. Are we serving God as we should or are we too involved pursuing our own agendas? Let us make sure we are always in the right place at the right time for our Lord. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
6:4 When we read of the apostles giving themselves ‘continually to prayer’ we should not assume that they did nothing but pray. We know that they preached and did miracles. The ‘continual’ prayer was prayer that was regularly offered. In like manner we can continually pray even though we do other tings. It is an attitude which sees prayer as a regular part of daily life which the apostles manifested. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We read of the new “Welfare Committee” in Acts 6:5,6. But we do not read of what the committee did. Rather, we read of two of its members being super preachers. This is a good lesson to tell us that we do not specialise in one part of the truth’s work to the detriment of others. The Welfare Committee were also preachers. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||
| 5:32 "The Holy Spirit; whom God hath given to them." If God gave the Holy Spirit, then surely it is beyond all limits of logic to argue that the Holy Spirit is a third person within the Godhead. If God gave the Holy Spirit, then the Holy Spirit must have been something that could be given to a Human being. God gave the Holy Spirit not as a free gift, but as a method of control over His witnesses who spoke His Word. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
5:13-14 Notice the contrast – ‘durst no man join’ with ‘believers were the more added …’. Clearly we are seeing two totally different views. The first being the group of Jewish leaders who were trying to subvert the gospel. The second being faithful men and women wanting salvation. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Stephen is considered the first Christian martyr. Stephen was appointed with six others to deal with disputes between Hebrew and Greek-speaking Jewish members of the ecclesia. The name Stephen is Hellenistic and underscores his Greek-Jewish roots. Stephen was brought before the Jewish Council on trumped-up charges (6:12). The Supreme Council was the Sanhedrin, but there were two lesser courts in Jerusalem and also one court in each town of the country. It is not clear which court, in Jerusalem, charged him. The authority of the courts also extended to Jews living in foreign countries. They were allowed to operate, of course, under the aegis of the Romans. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Acts 5:12 Strongs says the word accord is "A unique Greek word, used 10 of its 12 New Testament occurrences in the Book of Acts, helps us understand the uniqueness of the Christian community. Homothumadon is a compound of two words meaning to "rush along" and "in unison". The image is almost musical; a number of notes are sounded which, while different, harmonise in pitch and tone. As the instruments of a great concert under the direction of a concert master, so the Holy Spirit blends together the lives of members of Christ's church." Now we know that in the dedication of the temple by Solomon 2Chron 5:12 how there was a unison of faithful (Heman) brethren, gathered together (Asaph) to praise (Jeduthun) the Lord. And these brethren "stood at the east end of the altar". It is interesting to note that the brethren in Acts were in Solomon's Porch Now Strongs tells us that, " the portico built by Solomon in the eastern part of the temple " . There is such a wonderful harmony between these two events. Richard Snelling [Swansea] Comment added in 2008 reply to Richard |
||||||||||
|
5:11 Doubtless Ananias and Sapphira were not the only people who were dishonest in their dealings with the church and God. The record is there to show the way in which the event impacted on the church and non believers who heard about it. We learn that our actions can impact upon others Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| bearing arms / war - Acts 5:29;Matt 5:44;John 18:36;Matt 26:52;Rom 12:19,21;John 8:23;Mark 10:19;Deut 32:35;2Tim 2:24;Deut 5:17;Ecc 3:1,3,8; (when God directs war) 1Chron 5:22;Psa 149:1-9. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
5:2 Keeping back part of the price is akin to Israel keeping back their best cattle from sacrifice (see my note today’s Deuteronomy reading). 5:19 This episode is an example of Psa 34:7. 5:34 Gamaliel was the son of Simeon. Some wonder if this was the same Simeon as described in Luke 2:25-35. Gamaliel was Paul’s teacher (Acts 22:3). With all these events that came into Gamaliel’s life he must have reflected upon Jesus’ teachings. However, Jewish history has him continuing to be a Pharisee until his death in 50 AD. 6:1 Hebrew speaking Jews born in the Land felt superior to the Greek speaking Jews from the provinces and treated them poorly. 6:5 All the names in this verse are Greek and it is probable that they were Jews of the troubled Grecian group. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
5:34 Gamaliel was not simply stating a rational point. Being a Pharisee he doubtless was sympathetic to the way in which the apostles were preaching the resurrection. The very conflict between Pharisee and Sadducee provided a disunited front on the part of the religious leaders which assisted the work of the apostles. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
TEAMWORK When the complaints about the care of the widows in the early church started to come to the fore, the twelve apostles came to a decision to help in the situation. They said, "It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word in order to wait on tables. Brothers, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word." (Acts 6:2-4) What the apostles had started was teamwork. They realised that they could not do everything by themselves and that they were going to be of more use praying and preaching than they were going to be serving meals or giving out welfare. Once the decision had been made, the people selected, and the work begun, the comment was made "So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith." (v.7) It was once the teamwork was in place that the growth began to happen. So let us follow their example and allow each person to play their part in our gatherings. In doing so we will encourage more effective work and growth in our churches. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Robert |
||||||||||