|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.
2 - The place which the Lord shall choose, ultimately, is Jesus - the dwellingplace
of the just - the sacrifice that is our passover - 1Cor.5:7. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.
12 There are four occasions
in Deuteronomy when Israel were told to remember that they were bondmen in Egypt.
Deuteronomy
15:15 here 24:18 22
It was important to remind this new generation of that as most of their experience
would be of the wilderness journey. The fact that they were bondmen was to help
them to appreciate that they had to keep the ordinances of the Lord. Likewise
we should appreciate that we were bondmen to sin and, now being redeemed, we should
serve our redeemer. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.3
- reflects the command in Exo
12:15. There is no place for those without the discipline to keep leaven out
of their diet for the whole week. This is a particular slip which has a specified
consequence - explusion from the people. Any of us who have tried to diet will
know the discipline required. This has a lesson for us in the way we live that
we might not be blotted out of the book of life where we are written. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The
order of the feasts is given in Leviticus
23. Here the Passover and Tabernacles are given especial emphasis as marking
the beginning and the consummation of God's ways with Israel; the former speaking
of redemption, the foundation of all: the latter, or re - gathered Israel blessed in the kingdom. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| :12
That Israel were to remember that they were bondmen in Egypt was to enable them
to remember the deliverance that they had experienced. It is so easy to forget
what has been done for us. We have been delviered from a situation that is worse
than being slave in Egypt. We have been delivered from death. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16:6 Here is confirmation that Israel left Egypt 'in the evening'. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| V.19 It appears that the gift (that must not be taken) Would have been taken as a form of bribery. It is described as something that would blind.(or put a film over the eyes) and pervert (twist) the words of the rightous. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Feast of Weeks was 50 days after the Passover. Barley harvest commenced at Passover (our Easter time), and within 7 weeks the wheat harvest had begun. This 50 days was known as Pentecost, from the word for 50. But Pentecost was also the anniversary of God giving (Acts 2:1) the power to start Christ's
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.1 The month Aviv (March/April) marked spring. Aviv is a Canaanite name. Most countries in the Near East started their year in spring. Israel chose to start their year in the fall (Ethanim - September/October). They did change it to spring during and after the Babylonian exile only to be later changed back to fall by the rabbis. Also, Babylonian month names were adopted, and so Aviv became Nisan and Ethanim became Tishri. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16:2 In saying that Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| V.3-4 - they left Egypt/sin in haste and there was no corrupting yeast used. Similarly, we need to flee from sin and not turn back Gen 19:26 or we risk facilitating the entrance of sin and corruption into our thinking and actions Matt 16:11-12. We need to be humble, not puffed up and corrupted, for at best we are unworthy servants Luke 17:10 dependant on God's mercy and grace. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 As we saw in chapter 11 the emphasis on where the feasts were to be keep was to be where God had chosen to place His name. Worship has to be on Gods terms even if that requirement is not convenient. Just as it would not have been convenient for many in Israel to travel to Jerusalem three times in the year. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16:19 We are familiar with the idea that a ‘gift’ – that is a bribe, corrupts. Lest we think that we cannot be tainted in such a way and thereby be inclined to accept gifts we should notice that such ‘gifts’ corrupt even the ‘righteous’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.10 The Feast of Weeks was the Harvest Festival held on the 50th. Day (7 weeks after Passover). In the New Testament, the feast is known as Pentecost (Greek for fiftieth). V.13 The Feast of Tabernacles (booths) was held for one week in the fall (15-22 Tishri). It was designed to recount Israel’s wilderness journey in which they dwelt in booths; and it was also part of harvest thanksgiving. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16:2-6 The first passover was kept with each family in its own house before the children of Israel. Left Egypt. However when they were in the land of promise they had to travel to Jerusalem each year for this is the place that God chose. So the nation had to trust that God would preserve their possessions in the cities they left to go and keep the feast. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.1 The moth Aviv will later be changed to Nisan under the Babylonian rule (Neh 2:1; Est 3:7). Aviv actually means green as part of a phrase the green ears of barley. It indicates springtime. The largest city in Israel is Tel-Aviv which means Springhill. V.19 This is such a difference with the dispensation of justice which we see today. Today we see corruption; the rich being treated differently than the poor; important persons often getting a free pass etc. But, when Christ returns and dispenses His justice, all will be treated equally. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Immediatly before this review of the passover (1-8) is a reminder about firstborn animals (15:19-23). Is God suggesting that the firstborn animal, which had to be sacrificed anyway, be saved until the passover and sacrificed then? In this way a single lamb could carry out multiple functions; presumably a welcome proposition to the poor? Jesus too was a single sacrifice, but fulfilled all of the types and shadows of the law in one go. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
In chapter 16 the same phrase, "in the place which the Lord shall choose to place his name" occurs three times (2, 6 & 11). On the first 2 occasions it relates to place where the passover lamb was sacrificed. Surely this must have been of comfort to Christ to know that his Father's name, and all that it stood for, was exactly wher he was bieng crucified. However we understand Christ's quotation from Psalm 22v1, he knew God was with him as he became our sacraficial lamb. Lindsay Yuile [Glasgow South Scotland (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Lindsay |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deut 16:10,17;Luke 12:48 - a general principle that to whom much is given much is required. Deut 16:21 - Not fully following or fully trusting in God; worshipping more than one thing and not being singleminded. What are the idols and distractions that take us away from fully serving God? Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16:14-15 Notice these feasts were not a time for sadness but rejoicing. They were to remember that they had been saved from Egypt. Do we view our remembrance of Jesus death and resurrection with rejoicing? Or do we meet together to remember Jesus out of a sense of duty, or habit? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.2
- 5 - There is a great deal of wisdom required on the (relatively rare) occasions
when the demands of society conflict with the teaching of God. One of the createst
reasons to develop Godly wisdom so entirely is to deal with these very situations,
and to advise those who have less experience and wisdom when they meet these times
in their lives. Nevertheless, Paul reminds us that God is in control of the powers
that be. Rom.
13:1-4, though he also
says "We ought to obey God rather than men" Acts
5:29. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.
1 The shining face
and bold face are both comments upon the benefits of acquiring wisdom. They are
a consequence of God's blessing [Numbers
6:25] and is associated
with salvation [Psalm
31:16 80:7] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.12
- Consider these passages: ch.7:15,
Rom.2:5, 9:22, 2Pet.2:9, Matt.25:34-46 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Isaiah draws upon the counsel of this chapter
The wise man is laying down a principle which is universally true - even though often it appears that the wicked do actually prosper. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| :17
So we realise that knowledge of God only comes from His own revelation of Himself
- as is also seen Ecclesiastes
3:11. For us that revelation is His word. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8:1 An example of a man who manifest these characteristics is Stephen Acts 8:15 Stephen, against the opposition of the Jews kept the king's commandment as spoken of in this chapter. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| V.7 "knoweth not that which shall be." All men, both kings and subjects are on the same level. There is one event, whose coming cannot be forseen, so no man has the power over death. Since all will come to this end, the wise man will bide his time and not try to force events by rebellion. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Verse 14 depends on your point of view, doesn't it? Bad things happen to good people, and good things to bad, but when you see it from another perspective you could say that the good get what they deserve because they are in fact sinful, and God is merciful to the bad and gives him more good than they deserve! Either way, God is glorified by the way He has set up the world. When we realise that we are all sinners and all deserve death for it, we can be glad when it in fact doesn't come immediatly (v11) and also that the difficult things we suffer can actually bring our lives into perspective. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vs.16,17 It does not matter how clever or sophisticated man becomes, he will never be able to quantify or qualify God or His works. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| JUST DESSERTS It's that age old struggle that so many people have tried to deal with and few have come up with an answer for. Even Solomon seemed to struggle as he grappled for understanding. In the end Solomon added it to his basket of "meaningless things." This is what he said, "There is something else meaningless that occurs on earth: righteous men who get what the wicked deserve, and wicked men who get what the righteous deserve. This too, I say, is meaningless." (Ecc 8:14) We need to remember as we consider this dilemma, that Solomon was speaking about his observations of life, and in particular, he was looking to see whether there was meaning to life without God. Here we can come to the conclusion that life without God does not make sense at all. Even those who serve him do not seem to get rewarded. But this life is not the time of reward or punishment (although God may choose to do so if he wishes), now is our time to be tested. Will we live for God or not? It is the time to make our choice and step out in faith. Then at the return of Christ "God will give to each person according to what he has done. To those who by persistence in doing good ... he will give eternal life. But for those who are self seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger." (Rom 2:6-8) With God in the picture we can begin to understand the meaningless things that seem out of place without him. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.2 The oath of God is the covenant which God made with Abraham and with David, Solomon remembered Psa 89:35-36 "I have sworn" and the penalties if David's children should forsake it V.30-32; inflicted on Solomon himself, yet God not utterly forsaking him.V.33-34 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ecc 8:1 speaks of a person who has wisdom. His face shines. The AV says that “the boldness of his face shall be changed.” The word “boldness” is usually translated as “strength”. The wise person will often have a peaceful face. Many of our elderly Brothers and Sisters have lovely, peaceful faces. Their faith has affected their lives, and they look at the world in a different way to many others of their age. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8:6 The preacher returns to, and draws upon, the points that were made in Ecc 3:1-8 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| V.7 - there are and have been many psychics but the Bible clearly says no one can predict the future as John Wilson touched on. On the other hand, I wonder if some actually have forms of ESP which is sometimes used by the authorities to help locate victims, etc. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8:8 Death is the inevitable end for all. However with modern medicine we are able to prolong life. Indeed it seems that we now expect that modern medicine can treat al our ills. We may even feel that modern medicine is failing if it cannot solve our medical problems. However we must realise that man has no control over his destiny. God is in control and we should appreciate that point and live accordingly. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8:2 The ‘king’ whose commandments are to be kept is God. The subjects of a king owe him allegiance, in like manner we owe our King total allegiance. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.15 The preacher concludes that one should enjoy oneself in this lifetime because life is essentially meaningless. Paul would agree with the preacher if life had no meaning. But, Paul believed that true followers of Jesus would be brought back to life to live forever without the pain of this present world (1Cor 15:32,53,54; Rev 21:4). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8:5 The way that the one who keeps the commandment has no evil echoes the way in which Moses speaks to Joshua and Caleb – Psa 91:10 - about their experience in the wilderness. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
V.11 Because Yahweh does not immediately pass sentence on sinners, the wicked will continue to sin. Some choose to believe that Yahweh does not see their sin. This was the case of the ancients of Israel committing abominations in Jerusalem (Eze 8:12). Today, people think they have immunity because they have decided that God is dead. But, He is very much alive and He will dispense justice in His own time. Yahweh, in His mercy, waits before levelling a sentence so as to give the sinner time to repent. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8:14 It is not possible to look at a man’s circumstances and determine whether he is pleasing to God or not. This contrasts with the way that human nature views things. Success is viewed as a virtue and poverty or a difficult life if viewed as an indication that we should not have anything to do with that person. However God does not judge according to outward appearances. So why do we? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v.
55 - Stephen shared this experience with Isaiah (ch.6:1-3)
and Ezekiel (ch.1:26-28)
and John (Rev.21:11)
and by us too if we believe (2Cor.4:6). Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Using your marginal
references you can see the detailed way in which Stephen uses the Old Testament.
The major thrust of his argument is that the 'God of glory' appeared repeatedly
outside the land of Israel. Also notice how Stephen, by inspiration, provides
information which is not recorded elsewhere in Scripture Acts
7:25 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7:17
The 'time of the promise' is the fulfilment of Genesis
15:13-14 so we see that the Exodus was actually promised to Abraham. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| :30
In saying the forty years were 'expired' we may conclude that Moses' 40 years
in the land of Midian was for a specific reason. That reason was because God was
punishing the nation who were in Egypt (Ezekiel
20:6-8) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Similarity between the death of Jesus and that of Stephen. Jesus Stephen
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7:25 Here we learn a little that is not recorded in Exodus - that Moses, at the age of 40, knew that his job was to deliver Israel From Egypt. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acts 7 provides a handy historical summary of God's dealings with His people Israel from Abraham to early first century AD. There are other summation chapters, like Psalm 78. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7:1 ‘come into the land …’ highlights that God was already there in the land of Canaan! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
V.41 It is interesting to note that Stephen describes this incident in three stages. (1) They made a calf. (2) They brought sacrifices to it. (3) They rejoiced in the works of their hands.(Exo 32:17-19) There are likewise three lessons to be taken from this. (1) Idolatry is treason against God. (2) Active participation is a greater sin. (3) To rejoice or glory in it is an additional sin. To rejoice in the works of our own hands is to worship the creature rather than the creator.(Rom 1:25) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"you said 'Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs which Moses gave us'. Is this true!" Stephen's answer to the accusations of the council was an eloquent but lengthy treck through the history of the Jewish fathers. The council must have thought this strange, but something about Stephen's countenance held them transfixed. Stephen was Jesus' mouthpiece through the Spirit that moved his lips. But why did the history lesson finish at the building of the temple, and what was it about the quote in v49-50 that brought the sudden condemnation of v51? Why was this the culmination of those carefully chosen words? The answer is simple when we look at the quote. It is Isaiah 66. They knew what the rest of the chapter said. They knew that he was answering their accusation by using a prophecy, and they knew the prophecy was coming true. It was they and their nation that was on trial, not Stephen:
The answer was yes, your accusation is true! No wonder they were cut to the heart. Then they ran with one accord and set in motion the events that would lead to the destruction of their nation, and the fulfilment of all these things. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7:6-7 The extensive quotation from Gen 15:13 demonstrates that when God spoke to Abraham in Genesis 15 He was prophesying the bondage in Egypt. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Very few people have seen Jesus since his ascension, but Stephen is one. Paul is another (Gal 1:11,12), and John is another (Rev 1:12-18) David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7:7 Stephen uses his words with extreme care. His quotation from Ex.3:12 shows that the Israelites would be given a Law under which they would serve God. But, Abraham was born and died before the Law was given, therefore the Law was not essential to salvation. Another aspect is that by bringing in Moses at this point in connection with Abraham, Stephen leaves the inference that Moses was rejected in the early stages by the people, and the people to whom Stephen was now talking, did the same thing by rejecting the Messiah. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7:8 I suppose some might view circumcision as an imposition upon Abraham and his descendants. However Stephen says that God ‘gave’ him the covenant. It was a gift from God. It was the seal of the covenant of eternal inheritance in the land. I am left wondering whether we sometimes view the life that we are expected to live as a constraint rather than a gift. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7:4 That Abraham entered the land of Canaan ‘when his father was dead’ is an historical fact. However it also fits into what God asked of him. He had been called to leave his father and mother – Gen 12:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Holy Spirit - part one (see April 30 for part two) 1. The Heb word for "spirit" is "ruwach" (7307); the Grk word for "spirit" is "pneuma" (4151) and they indicate breath, exhalation, etc. 2. The Holy Spirit is the breath, exhalation, power and glory radiating from God. 3. One can't flee from the spirit - Psa 139:7-12. 4. Some believe the Holy Spirit is a diety, but if it is: Why is there no mention of the Holy Spirit on God's throne (Acts 7:55-56; Rev 7:10)? Why is there no mention of it in the Divine order 1Cor 11:3? Why in the 11 occurrences of blessing which follow the invocations in the epistles is there not one that contains any mention of the Holy Spirit? The word "spirit" is neuter in gender and doesn't in itself denote personality. 5. Luke 1:35 - the Holy Spirit created Christ and is the power of the Father (i.e. God). If the Holy Spirit was a literal being other than the Father (i.e. God) Christ would be the son of the Holy Spirit and not the son of the Father. 6. The spirit creates and gives life (Job 33:4)...the spirit isn't God it eminates from and is "of" God. 7. Matt 12:32 - here we read the Holy Spirit is to be revered more than Christ. This and John 14:28 are two of a number of passages refuting the theory of a tri-equal trinity . Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past 5. Israel, his sons and families went into Egypt Gen 37 Gen 42-46 Acts 7:1-18 Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past 7. At the end of this time, God raised up Moses to be their deliverer. Ex 2-4 Acts 7:18-36 Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past 8. The Wilderness Journey from Egypt to Canaan was 40 years long. Exo 16:35 Num 14:33 Num 32:13 Deut 2:7 Deut 8:2,4 Deut 29:5 Josh 5:6 Neh 9:21 Psa 95:10 Acts 7:36 Acts 13:18 Heb 3:9,17. Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen's deliberation provides a useful synopsis of Jewish history. It is interesting, though, that he states Abraham bought land in Shechem from the sons of Emmor (Hamor)(v.16). Abraham bought land in Hebron for a burial place (Gen 49:30,31), but nowhere in scripture is it recorded that he bought land in Shechem. However, it is recorded that Jacob purchased land in Shechem in which Joseph's bones (and presumably his) were buried (Gen 33:18,19; Josh 24:32). And so, why did Stephen make that statement? Perhaps he was using Abraham in a patriarchal sense as father of all faithful (Rom 4:16). Certainly, Jacob qualified as being of the same faith as Abraham (Matt 8:11). Like Jesus who came in the spirit of His father and was called by His Name, perhaps Stephen is applying the same measure to Jacob vis-à-vis Abraham. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
7:48 And now Stephen arrives at the crux of his argument. He had been accused – Acts 6:14- of saying that Jesus was going to destroy the temple. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2010 reply to Ken |
||||||||||||||||||||||||