|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.5,9,17
- It was recognised by God that Joshua, taking over from one of the greatest leaders
of all time, and certainly from one of the closest to God, would need a deal of
encouragement. God would also realise of course, that we, and all other generations
reading this in the future, would also need a deal of encouragement. So let us
take it. Josh.3:7,
Matt.28:20, Acts 18:9,10, 2Tim.4:17, Heb.13:5. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 1:7
We might think be strong and very courageous was a necessary exhortation
to a nation going to battle but we notice that the strength and courage are to
be manifest in keeping the law of God, not in military matters. Of course we should
expect this as it is God who was going to fight for them. They did not need to
rely on their own strength Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.18
- The law has no compromise - no shades of grey, as it were - there was death
for disobedience. Full stop. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| So this is the
culmination of a forty year wait. All the males who were standing in Shittim knew
that they were going to pass into their inheritance. This anticipation doubtless
caused them to say 1:16
'All that thou commandest us we will do
' We, in a way, make a similar declaration
at baptism. How long did it take before that initial enthusiasm wore off? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Joshua appears
as the leader of Israel. We might think this is because he was one of the faithful
spies. Whilst this must be part of the story another element is that Joshua had
always been closely associated with Moses. He is spoken of as Moses' 'minister'
at the beginning of the wilderness journey (Exodus
24:13) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We may ask the
question "How would speaking about and meditating upon God's law cause Joshua's
way to be prosperous with good success?" The answer is that this speaking
and meditating would enable him to observe and to keep and always to have God's
Word there at the forefront of his mind (Deut.6:8,9)
during the difficult period of leading God's people into the land. During this
time, speaking and meditating would constantly bring to mind what God's requirements
were, and for the nation this would be the difference between blessing and cursing
(Deut.28:29).
This is a great spiritual lesson for ourselves. Speaking about and meditating
upon God's word in all our ways will keep us on that straight and narrow path
which leads to life. Psa.119:105,
Mal.3:16,17, Psa.1:1-3. (Blessing not cursing - Gal.3:14). Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
| 1:7 'observe to do' quotes Deut 6:3 reinforcing the importance of keeping the law in the military context of taking the land of Canaan. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Our Lord Jesus Christ took upon Him the form of a servent. Joshua, likewise was a servent unto Moses. Jesus, of course is the Greek for Joshua. Joshua's name was significant of the services he would render and typified those of a greater Saviour. (Deliverer)Heb 4:8
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Joshua was of the tribe of Ephraim (Num 13:8). Ephraim, Joseph's younger son, was blessed by Jacob, as if he was the firstborn, see Gen 48:12-22. I wonder if Joshua's promotion to be leader was a part fulfillment of this blessing? David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| V.5 Canaan was Israels by the covenant made to Abraham. The confirmation of that promise made to Joshua when he was about to the people into it intimated not only a certain, but an easy conquest. It is remarkable, however, the hope of victory was to depend on his firm and inflexible adherence to the law of God. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
1:8 In telling Joshua to ‘meditate therein night and day’ he is being reminded of the injunction – Deut 17:19 – so a military captain, who has a land to conquer, is encouraged to spend his time thinking about Scripture. Of course this is most appropriate. The biggest enemy that Joshua had to contend with was the desires of the flesh to not believe what God said. The same is true of ourselves. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| As was previously mentioned, "Joshua" is the Heb. form of "Jesus" which is Grk. We see echos of the latter Joshua/Jesus in this earlier Joshua. V.11,13 - in "three days" they would cross the "Jordan" (perhaps symbolic of baptism, washing away sins, and burial with Christ) to enter the God given "rest" and "land" (perhaps an echo of the millenial day of rest post resurrection when Christ returns and the meek inherit the earth - Matt 5:5; 6:10). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
V.4 The Hittites occupied the southern extremities, and were the dominant tribe of Canaan. Their superior power and the extent of their dominions are attested by many historical records of both the Assyrians and the Egyptians. What encouragement must have been imparted to Joshua by the assurance that his people, who had been overwhelmed with fear of that gigantic race. They were to now posssess "all the land of the Hittites" , not part of it, but, all of it. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
1:5 The commandment to Joshua ‘Be strong and of a good courage …’ echoes the encouragement that Moses gave to the nation at the end of his life – Deut 31:7 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:6-8 Given that Joshua was to encourage the people in the warfare and that he was to meditate in the law we can imagine him walking through the ranks, talking to the officers. His conversation would be on Scripture. He would be discussing how the Scriptures related to their lives rather than simply talking about military strategies. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The conquest of Canaan, under the leadership of Joshua, occurred around 1400 BC. Joshua, himself, largely wrote the book that bears his name, with a few sections added probably by Eleazar or Phineas. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
1:17 ‘According as we hearkened unto Moses’ indicates that the people thought they obeyed Moses. The historical record in Numbers indicates that they did not. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Joshua was first called Oshea (Num 13:16). It is the same name as the prophet Hoshea (Heb. yehoshua) and means savior or salvation. Of course, it is the same name as Our Lord Jesus which is the Greek form of the name. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
The meek warrior Joshua now took over from Moses. But why hadn't he done so before? He was at the very least 50 years old. One could say that he was past his prime. Moses on the other hand had been 120 years old when he gave up leadership. Why didn't Joshua step in and take over from this old man earlier? When God spoke to Joshua directly, perhaps for the first time, the Bible record says in effect "Joshua was Moses' servant. But Moses was God's servant" (v1-2). Do you think that made Joshua feel small? And in the previous chapter comparing and contrasting Moses and Joshua "Joshua may have been full of the spirit of wisdom... but was nothing compared to Moses who the LORD knew face to face. No-one was ever as great as Moses" (my paraphrase of Deut 34:9-12). So Joshua appears to have been a man of unfathomable meekness, loyalty and wisdom. When Korah, Dathan and Abiram rose up against the leadership of Moses he didn't join them, even though all of the camp appeared to be behind them. So that when his time finally came to lead, though God didn't expect him to be as great as Moses, the blessing of Moses was still to be his: "as I was with Moses, so I will be with you" (v5). So also with us. Though we will never be great like Jesus, If we are meek and follow him, his blessing will be on us too (Matt 5:5, John 16:14-15, Rev 3:21) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
|
1:11 After three days is a bit like moving from the wilderness to everlasting life through the resurrection – the waters of Jordan following the pattern of the death and resurrection of Jesus who rose ‘The third day’ 1Cor 15:4 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.15
- The concept of the butter and honey, which begins here apparently as symbolic
of the righteous food of Christ, is extended to include us in v.22.
We surely are amongst those that are 'left in the land' in a spiritual sense.
Let us realise what a great mercy God has for us and be thankful and rejoice,
that it might be said of us that it was said of Jesus - Luke
2:52. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.14
'Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son and thou shalt call his name Immanuel'
is a passage we usually take to speak of Jesus. [Isaiah
7:14 Matthew 1:23] However the phrase has been used before [Judges
13:3,5,7] to speak
of the birth of Samson. We should be alert to earlier uses of phrases and ideas
which are later presented as prophecies because the earlier use may thrown light
onto the prophecy in the New Testament that we are reviewing. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Carrying on from
the above comment, notice (v.22)
that the implication is that butter is available due to the abundance of milk.
This promise that includes us then, is of better than the milk and honey from
before, as we would expect, because it refers to God's kingdom on earth. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:1
Having taken us to the end of Ahaz's life we now move back to an earlier time
in his life - when he was offered a sign (7:11)
he refused it - because of his Godless manner of life Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :3
Shearjashub means a remnant shall return The name passes into use in Isaiah as
a recurring refrain (10:21,
36:2) The later uses draw upon the historical detail given here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| This chapter concerns
the judgements coming upon Samaria and Damascus. "God's word shall not return
to him void". God's judgements did come upon the northern kingdom and Damascus
as prophesied by Isaiah (2Kings
15:29, 16:9). God is patient and longsuffering. He shows forbearance in his
character, decisions and actions. Above all, he waits patiently for the people
to turn to him for salvation. The lesson for us is that although we may try God's
patience (Isa.7:13),
he continues to be patient with sinful people (Acts
13:18) and will delay
his punishment. If we are being led away from our high calling in the Lord Jesus
Christ, let us turn to and seek the Father whilst he may be found (Isa.55:6) Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
| V.9 Rotherham translates the last part of this verse; "If you trust not, surely you can not be trusted." Ahaz brought distress on himself by distrust in the LORD, and trust in Assyria. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 7:20 The hired razor was Tiglath-Pilneser and the event is recorded in 2Chron 28:20. Ahaz had hired him to help him against Syria was distressed by those he thought would save him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
You would never know from the sign God gave to King Ahaz, in Isa 7:14-16, that there was a hidden message about Messiah. But we know that it is there because of the comment on its fulfilment in Matt 1:23. Does this point out to us that there are many more prophecies of Christ, or the latter days, in other seemingly “local” prophecies?
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
7:15 Knowing to ‘refuse the evil, and choose the good’ echoes the options that Adam and Eve had in the Garden of Eden – Gen 2:16-17 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
7:2 Ephraim being confederate with Syria speaks of the northern kingdom joining with the Syrian. An alliance that sought to overthrow Judah and fight off the Assyrian. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 7:13 Isaiah as yet had given no outward proof that he was from God; but now God offered a sign, which Ahaz publicly rejects. The sin is therefore now not merely against men, but openly against God. Isaiah's manner therefore changes from mildness to bold reproof. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
7:13 In speaking about being wearied himself we gain an insight into the degree to which the prophet was affected by the apathy and opposition of those around him. We must be aware that the prophets of God had feelings and even though they were sent by God they often despaired of their mission. So we see that God’s servants have always lamented the lack of response to the preaching of the word of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Ahaz did not do right in the sight of God and his subsequent evil acts are catalogued (See 2Kin 16). However, Yahweh prophesied through Isaiah that Rezin and Pekah would not overcome Ahaz in war (vs.4-7 ).The sign that Ahaz was given (vs.14-16) is taken to refer to Christ. But the historical context should also be considered. This child Immanuel (God with us) was a sign of the present and future help of Yahweh. The term virgin (Heb. almah) can simply refer to a young woman or maid or bride, and have no other spiritual connotation. In the first case it was Isaiah's wife; in the second case it was the betrothed of Joseph. In the historical context, we are told that before Immanuel would be old enough to reason morally, the two offending kings, Rezin and Pekah would be destroyed (v.16). Pekah reigned 752-732 BC and then was assassinated (2Kin 15:27,30); Rezin died when Damascus was destroyed. Tilgath-pileser destroyed both their kingdoms (Aram and Israel captured in 722 BC; and Damascus destroyed in 732 BC). Both of these events occurred within 12 years of the prophecy's being given. In Judaism, one is considered to have reached moral understanding at 12 years of age (v.16 cf. Luke 2:42). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
7:1 This time is spoken of in the historical record in 2Kin 16:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
The children of Isaiah were named as signs of future happenings: 1) Shear-jashub mans the remnant will return (v.3). This statement is echoed in Isa 10:21,22. The final fulfilment of this prophecy is the gathering in of Israel when Jesus returns (Isa 11:12; Jer 3:18). 2) Immanuel means God with us (v.14). The immediate application was that God was with Ahaz over Rezin and Pekah. But, the future sign was that of Jesus, the Son of God who would be among humankind to bring the opportunity of salvation (Matt 1:23). 3) Maher-shalal-hash-baz (Isa 8:1,3) means hastens to the spoil, speeds to the prey. He was a sign that Assyria would destroy Syria and Samaria, the enemies of Judah. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Isa 7:14 - that this prophesy refers to Christ and the virgin birth of Mary is corroborated by the New Testament record Matt 1:20-25;Luke 1:27-36. Also of interest is Isa 7:15 where we read how Immanuel, though he never sinned, had to learn good from evil and doesn't know the date of his return to earth Mark 13:26,32,33 - this contrasts with God who can't sin, can't be tempted with evil James 1:13;Heb 4:15 can't die 1Tim 6:16 and knows all things 1John 3:20. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
7:17 The departure of ‘Ephraim’ from ‘Judah’ is speaking of the time of the beginning of the divided kingdom. Ephraim stands for the 10 tribes. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Isa 7:3 - "Isaiah" [(3470) means "Jah has saved"] and when added to "Shearjashub" (7610) results in the message "God has saved" and "a remnant will remain" insuring that God's people will never be totally destroyed with an ultimate outcome being a spiritual and physical return (Isa 10:20-25;11:1-12). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
| Isa 7:14-15 - "Immanuel" means "God is with us". The word for "virgin" here is the Hebrew "almah" (5959) which is translated in the KJV as "virgin" 4 times, "maid" 2 times, and "damsels" 1 time. The Septuagint translates "almah" into the word "parthenos" in Isaiah 7:14. The Greek word "parthenos" (3933) is translated in the KJV every time as "virgin". The Jews in the centuries before Christ were content to accept "virgin" as the sense of "almah", but after Christ this became too dangerous/awkward an admission. A second Hebrew word used in the Bible to refer to "virgin" is "bethuwlah" (1330) which is translated in the KJV as "virgin" 38 times, "maid" 7 times, and "maiden" 5 times. Some scholars want to narrow the definition of "bethuwlah" to mean specifically "virgin" while Strong's indicates the word can mean "virgin, bride, maid" and that it comes from a root that means "to separate". In a sense Mary wasn't separated as Jesus was conceived in her as a result of the Holy Spirit overshadowing/joining her so perhaps this is why "almah" was used. Some scholars want to broaden the definition of "almah" and will even take Prov 30:19 where "almah" is translated into "maid" and suggest it should connected with (actually it is meant to show contrast with the next verse Prov 30:20) an adulterous woman. Others feel almah may have a slightly broader meaning so there might be a double prophecy with Isaiah 7:14-15 referring perhaps to Hezekiah a son of Ahaz or a son of Isaiah in addition to the primary prophecy of Mary and Jesus (Matt 1:22-23). There is no instance where it can be proved almah designates a young woman who is not a virgin. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 1
v.9,10 - The return is a strong element of the content of these 2 letters
to Thessalonica. It comes through again and again. Surely after studying these
books, we can be in absolutely no doubt that Jesus will return to establish that
which God has promised for those that follow faithfully - eternal life on earth.
This should sharpen our watchfulness. We are living, surely, in times when our
watchfulness is more and more required. 1Thes.4:16-17,
Gen.49:18, Job 19:25-27, Isa.25:8-9. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1v 3 without ceasing 5281 Patience is seen as a virtue which is to be developed in the Christ like believerLuke 8:15 21:19 Romans 2:7 5:3,4 8:25 15:4,5 2 Corinthians 1:6 6:4 12:12 Colossians 1:11 here 2 Thessalonians 1:4 3:5 1 Timothy 6:11 2 Timothy 3:10 Titus 2:2 Hebrews 10:36 12:1 James 1:3,4 5:11 2 Peter 1:6 Revelation 1:9 2:2,3,19 3:10 13:10 14:12 That it is mentioned so many times presses upon us the importance of the virtue and yet how difficult it is to attain. 2 v.9 Paul worked with his own hands so that he would not be a burden to the ecclesia at Thessalonica. He had recently established the ecclesia at Philippi [16:12] and so soon after he had established the ecclesia there they send financial aid to the apostle [Philippians 4:16]. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch.1 - It is only the two letters to the Thessalonians where we find 'Paul Silvanus and Timothy' writing together. 2:2 The mention of being 'shamefully intreated at Philippi' refers to the details contained in Acts 16:22 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1:2 In saying that he 'always' gives thanks to God Paul is reflecting what Jesus said about prayer (Luke 18:1). He is not saying that he prays for the brethren and sisters at Thessalonica all the time. He is speaking of a way of thinking about praying for each other. 2:3-5 Deceit and flattery are common currency amongst those of the world. The danger is that we might lower ourselves to speak in similar ways. The danger is that flattery tends to endear one to the person being spoken to and so the temptation is to flatter so that we will be liked whereas the requirement of Scripture is that we always speak the truth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We should never
ever underestimate the power of a good example, especially the one which says
of the Thessalonians that the word of God was effectually working within them
(2:11). These brethren and
sisters through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ were allowing the word to work
within them, and this in the midst of much affliction and tribulation (1:6). This example had
provoked much response (1:8). These believers were
being imitated by the whole ecclesial world. What a wonderful commendation this
is. God willing, we also can be examples, we can be patterns for others to copy
(1Tim.4:12,13) Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
| A MODEL FOR BELIEVERS "You became imitators of us and of the Lord; in spite of severe suffering, you welcomed the message with the joy given by the Holy Spirit. And so you became a model to all the believers in Macedonia and Achaia. The Lord's message rang out from you not only in Macedonia and Achaia - your faith in God became known everywhere." (1Thess 1:6-8) If we suddenly found ourselves as the model for believers everywhere, what sort of church would Jesus have? Just imagine if all the members of your church were just like you - what would your church be like? Whether we like it or not, someone is watching us. Someone is using us as a model to pattern their own behavior on. Someone is holding up our way of life as an example of Christian life. The Thessalonians were good examples for people to follow because of the way they followed their Lord, because their faith was strong even against strong opposition, and they were active in sharing the word. Let us also be good examples to follow for anyone who watches us. Let's be followers of Jesus - more like him than we are like ourselves. Let's strengthen our faith through prayer and reading God's word so that we may stand firm against any opposition that comes our way. And let's be examples of disciples who spread the word about their Master. Let's be model believers so that those who see us know what living a Christ-like life is all about. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
1:7-8 Maybe we think that communication in the first century was a little primitive compared with the 21st century. However whatever the communication was like the Thessalonica brethren were well know to all those in Macedonian. Do we think our ecclesia is such a light stand to the truth that all the brethren and sisters in the area where we live think of us as a good example? 2:6-7 In speaking of burdensome' and 'nurse' Paul is appealing to the language of Num 11:14 . He contrasts the burdensome of the nation in the wilderness with his concern that he would not be a burden to them and presents himself a the 'nurse' who is taking their burden upon himself.communication in the first century was a little primitive compared with the 21st century. However whatever the communication was like the Thessalonica brethren were well know to all those in Macedonian. Do we think our ecclesia is such a light stand to the truth that all the brethren and sisters in the area where we live think of us as a good example?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 2:3 It appears that there were those in Thessalonica who were slandering Paul for what he had not only taught them, but also for his motive and method of delivering it. Paul answers them by pointing out that the message was the Gospel which came from Christ. The motive in delivering it was most unselfish, and the method he used was not unlike a father toward his own children, and that it was above reproach.(note V.10) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
1:1 Paul, Silvanus and Timothy are found together in Corinth – 2Cor 1:19. 2:6 In being ‘not burdensome’ to the Thessalonians whilst accepting generosity from Philippi - Phil 4:16 – highlights a fundamental principle. Whilst the servants of the gospel can ‘live of the gospel’ 1Cor 9:14 – it is better not to be supported by those to whom one is ministering. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| EFFECTIVE PREACHING There are many different ways to go about convincing people of the truth we have in Christ, but the way Paul went about it was by far the best. He started by building relationships with those who showed interest in the message he preached. He did not expect anything from them, but poured out his love on them. This is what he says about his actions as he shared the gospel: "As apostles of Christ we could have been a burden to you, but we were gentle among you, like a mother caring for her little children. We loved you so much that we were delighted to share with you not only the gospel of God but our lives as well, because you had become so dear to us. Surely you remember, brothers, our toil and hardship; we worked night and day in order not to be a burden to anyone while we preached the gospel of God to you." (1Thess 2:6-9) Paul, Silas and Timothy were gentle with the new believers. They loved them deeply and showed their love in their actions. In doing this they proved that it was not possessions they were after, but that they cared for God's people. As far as it was possible Paul, Silas and Timothy removed anything that might possibly have a negative effect on the new followers of Christ. Let us act in the same way by building God centred relationships, being loving and gentle with those who are seeking the Lord. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
2:7 ‘nurse’ <5162> is related to the word translated ‘brought up’ <5142> in Luke 4:16showing that what Paul is talking about is parenting the ecclesia. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
It’s a lovely thought with which to start (and quite often, finish) his letters. Paul in effect writes a prayer in 1Thess 1:1. He prays that God and Jesus will give their grace and peace to the brothers and sisters at Thessalonica. We may wish people God’s blessing, but the only real way of making that wish come true is to turn it into a prayer.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||
1:6 John says that no man has ever seen God. John 1:18. Our lives should manifest Him. Likewise it is probable that none of the Brethren and Sisters in Thessalonica had seen Jesus, but they had seen Paul. Hence he was their visible role model. People look at us also. Do they see Jesus Christ in us? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Paul, Silas, and Timothy preached in Thessalonica. This was the second place in Europe that the Gospel was preached. Philippi was the first. Paul wrote the two letters to the believers in Thessalonica from Corinth in about 51 AD. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:4 Paul, because he is aware that the brethren have been chosen by God specifically prays for them. Recognising that they are special people in God’s sight Paul makes a point of talking to God about them. How do we view our fellow believers? Do we see them as special in God’s eyes? Or do we see them as irritants at times? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:4 Notice that Paul’s message was to please God, not men. We must always realise that this should be our objective in everything that we do either in public or in private. The flesh is so subtle that we may well think we are pleasing God when we are simply doing something to please ourselves. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||