|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| v.1
- There are many verses that express this idea of the Israelites conquering, but
this is relatively unusual in not directly giving the credit for that action to
God, though of course many other passages do, leaving us in no doubt that the
promised land is only obtainable by God's grace. Josh.1:15,
22:4. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| This chapter,
at the end of the campaign of the first eleven chapters, summarises the conquest
of the land. Vs
1-6 summarises the
work under Moses on the East of Jordan Vs
7-24 focuses on the
work of Joshua in the land of Canaan Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| v.24
- Those who know me will know I am quite a sceptic regarding the great significance
some people place on numbers in the Bible. I have read round the subject lately
to try to understand their point of view and I do see some quite remarkable things,
but am put off again when passages like this state a number which has no significance
and is not even a multiple of other numbers. Having said that, 31 kings conquered
by one nation is greatly impressive. The nations who were overcome would surely
recognise that these folk had no (human) king. One wonders what effect that had
on them! Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| This list of kings
of cities confirms what we have been seeing - that the land of Canaan was made
up of a number of city states. When Israel entered the land this fragmentation
continued through the period of the Judges and only changed when David became
king. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| :3
Just a little point about Biblical language. The Dead Sea is called 'the Salt
Sea'. That body of water is never called the Dead Sea in Scripture. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
12:1-6 Amidst all the details of the conquest of the land under Joshua we are reminded that Moses was the one who conquered the territory to the east of Jordan.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
V.1-2 The river Arnon on the south, and Mount Hermon on the north were the respective boundaries of the land given Israel beyond Jordon. Deut 2:24; 36, Deut 3:3-16 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| This chapter is a summary of the conquest of the Promised Land. Moses had led the people on the east of Jordan, and Joshua fought the battles on the west, in Canaan. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 33 Kings, when you count Og (v.4) and Sihon (v.2); which brings the number of kings up to 33 - the number of years our Lord Jesus unrelentingly fought his warfare against King Sin, and won. Maritta Terrell [Austin/Leander Texas (Central)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Maritta |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| This chapter contains a summary of the conquests made by the Children of Israel after entering the promised land. We have recorded for us, some places not noted previously. The boundaries of the land acquired beyond Jordon are also provided for us. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||
12:7-24 We now read a summary of the work Joshua had conducted so far in conquering the land of Canaan. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
12:1 So it is the ‘kings’ of the land which Israel smote. Of course they smote more than the kings but the kings headed up the cities. It is a parable of our struggle against sin. Each king, so to speak, is a sin that besets us. We must systematically resist them. Of course we cannot do it – just as the conquest was of God so it is in us. But we have to do the work also. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
V.4 Og, King of Bashan was a giant (one of the Rephaim who were related to other giants, the Emim and Anakim (Deut 2:10,11)). His bed measured thirteen-and-a-half feet by six feet (Deut 3:11). It is easy to be intimidated by powerful men (whether physically or otherwise). David was not intimidated by Og’s relative Goliath and neither should we be. David put his trust in Yahweh who is more powerful than anything we can conceive. Let us display the same sort of faith when challenged. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||
V.1 The territory being spoken about lay on the east side of the River Jordan, between Moab in the south and Mt. Hermon in the north. V.24 Thirty-one kings were conquered (thirty-three counting Sihon and Og). That means thirty-three cities were conquered. All the booty from these cities was making the Israelites richer. Also, the reputation of the Israelites would certainly be broadcast by travellers in the relatively small region. As national gods were important for protection, the Canaanite tribes in that area would be curious about the powerful God of Israel. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||
12:3 ‘Chinneroth’ <03672> is the old name for the Sea of Galilee. It means ‘harp’ and maybe was given this name because of the shape of the lake looking like a harp. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| v.14
- The three years was associated with Moab in ch.15:5
as well - in the 3year-old heifer. See also 23:9
(Tyre) Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| v.6
Moab's pride was the reason for her downfall. A theme that Jeremiah returns to.
[Jeremiah
48:29] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| v.13
- We are constantly reminded by reading prophecy that God knows the future - God
is from the beginning to the end - this means that he exists in all time and does
not have wait and see what happens next - as if all time is one and can be seen
simultaneously. A careful consideration of this situation, even from the point
of view of our finite minds, brings us to realise that God can lead us in the
way of right. He can keep us from the temptations that only He knows are coming
our way. It gives us all the more reason to rely entirely on Him at all times. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 16:5
The mention of the 'tabernacle of David' picks up the promise (Isaiah
9:7) of the rulership of Messiah. Amos (9:11)
a contemporary prophet develops the theme and speaks of the call of the gentiles
- (Acts
15:16) thus linking both Isaiah and Amos into the theme of the call of the
gentiles. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing the
theme from yesterday' chapter we now see a specific appeal being made to the rulers
of Moab. It is given against the background of the supremacy of Israel (:5).
Moab, being a descendant of Lot, (Genesis
19:36-37) should see themselves correctly with respect to the promises of
God - however Edom, Moab and Ammon all thought too highly of themselves on a number
of occasions when, rather than helping Israel actually opposed them and rejoiced
at their downfall. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 16:1 The reference to sending the lamb harks back to the days of Ahab (2Kin 3:4) where Moab was tribute to Israel. But now they have rebelled. Isaiah is seeking to get Moab to return to the agreement she made with Israel in the days of Ahab. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| V.4-5 This is another of Isaiah's pictures of the age to come which combines the role of King and Priest. "in mercy shall the throne be established" 2Sam 7:13 "He shall sit upon it in truth in the tabernacle of David" 2Sam 7:18 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||
The coming woe upon Moab (Chapter15) could be avoided if the proud country (V.6) would humble itself and be under the supremacy of Zion, for that very name tells of the grace that Moab so desperately needed. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Today, more about Moab. Moab and Ammon were the children of Lot (Gen 19:30-38). But they were not included in God’s promises to Abraham. It’s interesting to note that Moab was a thorn in the side of Israel and Judah, as part of God’s promised punishments (in Deut 28 and other places), but they were not a part of the blessings. Nearness to God’s promises count for nothing. It’s inclusion in them that counts - and note Ruth (the Moabite’s) confession of “Thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God.” (Ruth 1:16) David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
|||||||||||||||||||||
16:14 In making a very specific timed dated prophecy Isaiah is laying himself open to the charge of being a false prophet. If his words did not come to pass in a very short time – 3 years – he would lose all credibility. So what was to happen to Moab would be the guarantee that Isaiah was indeed a true prophet of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
16:4 The ‘outcasts’ are those that remain of Judah seeking refuge with their kinsmen – being the son of Lot – Gen 19:37. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 16:7 The foundations here we would think would be the ruins, because, when houses are pulled down, only the foundations are left,(Isa 58:12) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||
The refugees from Moab were holed up in Edom. Their request for resettlement in Judah was denied because of their pride. Furthermore, it was prophesied that within three years, (sooner rather than later), Moab would be decimated. This was carried out in part by the Assyrians, but more thoroughly by the Babylonians. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||
This chapter carries on without a break from Chapter 15. V.1 Moab formerly paid tribute to Israel but then reneged (2Kin 3:4,5). Yahweh urges Moab to start sending tribute again. This is because Moab will need the help of the Jews when it is attacked. It is like the time Jacob wanted to find peace and safety with his brother Esau. Jacob sent presents ahead of him (Gen 32:13-16). V.2 When Moab is ransacked, people will try to escape. They will try to escape across the River Jordan to the west. But will the pride of Moab prevent them from sending the tribute? Will that in turn prevent any escape route across the Jordan (Isa 16:6)? Vs.3,4 Yahweh urges His people to shelter the refugees. When Gog and his confederates devastate Israel in the end times, Jews will try to escape to Moab (part of Modern Jordan), as it will be untouched by Gog's invasion (Dan 11:41). V.14 Shalmaneser rifled some towns in Moab, as was mentioned in yesterday’s notes. But, the degree of devastation mentioned here came later at the hand of Nebuchadnezzar. After he had taken Jerusalem in 587 BC Nebuchadnezzar left Moab desolate and completed this prophecy against it. This took place in about 582 BC. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Jesus will sit on King David's throne in Jerusalem - Isa 16:5;Luke 1:31-33;Isa 2:3. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
|||||||||||||||||||||
16:2 The river Arnon is the border between Moab and Amon and discharges into the Dead Sea about half way up its West side. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| v.3,4
- In the context of this 'war' as a soldier of Christ, we must endure hardness,on
the one hand, but on the other, we should not get entangled with the affairs of
this life. It is important to tread exactly that line.
v.10, 1:8,
3:11, 4:5. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Links Between 2 Timothy 2 & Numbers
Numbers 16 deals with the rebellion of Korah, Dathan and Abiram. Those who oppose the Apostle Paul are here presented as being like Korah, Dathan and Abiram in the way that they resisted Yahweh through their attitude to Moses. The use of Numbers 12:3 in which, in the context of dealing with rebellion, Moses is presented as the meekest man demonstrates that meekness should not be confused with acquiescence in the behaviour of others. A meek man is not a 'door mat'. Moses knew what was correct and the Lord executed the judgment because He was the one being undermined by the actions of Aaron and Miriam. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2:8
'Of the seed of David' echoing Romans
1:3 highlights the importance of David to the things of the gospel in Christ. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| :23
'Foolish
questions' relate to issues which cannot be answered. In the time
of Timothy they often related to matters of the Law of Moses. We must realise
we are often involved in discussions about things to which we can have no answer.
It seems as if human nature would prefer to discuss this sort of thing rather
than focus on discussing what we can know and be edified by. We should be warned
by this. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2Tim 2:19. The foundations that Paul is speaking about here are of course the Old Testament covenants. The covenant that was made in the Garden of Eden, and the promises made to Abraham, Issac, and Jacob, along with the promises made to David. These promises are what Paul identifies as the Hope of Israel when he spoke to the chief of the Jews while in prison in Rome.(Acts 28:20) These promises are the foundation of what we believe to-day, we could not have a stronger foundation to build our faith on. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| 2:13 This verse is an expansion of the word which Paul spoke to the Romans (Rom 3:3) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2:1 In the use of the affectionate ‘my son’ Paul emphasises Timothy’s responsibilities in a lovely gentle way. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
v15 "approved" is Strong's 1384 and is often used of money which is the correct weight (refering to the habit at that time of shaving metal off the rims of the coins). The same word is used in James 1:12 when it is translated "test" in the NIV. v13 faithfulness is an attribute of God Exo 34:6 & also of the Lord Jesus Isa 11:5 v17 "gangrene" NIV is translated from a Greek word, Strong's 1044 , which comes from a word meaning "to gnaw", and is also translated "canker". The spread of infection/putrefaction from gangrene eventually overwhelms the body and may cause it to die, & the spread of cancer although locally obvious ( we see the lump growing, for example), is insidious in its spread to affect the rest of the body. Microscopically small particles spread/metastasise, and at the time one is not aware of the spread of the destructive force, but later it becomes obvious. So it is with those who spread falsehood in the Body. It is important to catch the infection/cancer early if the effects are not to be devastating. Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2:15 ‘approved’ <1384> is a term which speaks of the integrity of the money merchant. This type of merchant only dealt with true and unadulterated coins. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| The words “rightly dividing” in 2Tim 2:15 mean “to cut straight”. In other words we must use the scriptures correctly, and never be guilty of bending the truth of scripture to suit our own ends or views. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2:5 How is it that the idea of ‘lawful striving is introduced? It is possible for us to strive unlawfully in our struggle to be like Christ? Well actually it is if our focus is on our own status and position rather than being driven to be like Christ for the glory of God. So when we do things for the glory of men we are striving unlawfully. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
V.4 If the follower of Jesus were so concerned with his/her calling then he/she would have no time to be involved in worldly things. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2:3 The word translated ‘hardness’ <2553> is translated affliction – 2Tim 4:5 - showing that Paul is reminding Timothy yet again that he should expect persecution – something he experienced from the brethren in Ephesus! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
V.13 Jesus will always remain faithful, even if we waiver or fall away. Any time anyone falls away, He is there ready to gladly receive him/her back into His household. As the brothers and sisters of Jesus, we should also be as welcoming to anyone who has strayed. V.15 The expression: rightly dividing the word of truth (KJV) is translated in modern versions as: rightly handling (expounding correctly) the word of truth. Vs.24,25 Followers of Jesus would do well to memorize these two verses. For then, the correct behavior towards others would become reflexive. The behaviors must: not strive (quarrel, dispute); be gentle (kind); be apt to teach (instructive); instructing in meekness (humility). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2:14 The word 'charging’ <1263> carries the sense of ‘testify – Acts 2:41 – and not the sense of commanding that we might imagine from ‘charge’. The way to deal with those whose practise is astray from the gospel is by instruction not simply command. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||
The Lord knows those who are His I've always loved this little verse and it brings great comfort to my heart. Many people oftentimes claim to be experts on who is a part of the Body of Christ. After Paul wrote that the Lord knows those who are His, he wrote: (v.19) “Let everyone who names the name of Christ depart from iniquity.” Peter Dulis [toronto west] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
|||||||||||||||||||||