May 4

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Deuteronomy  21
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Deuteronomy 21 online in the King James Version
Listen to Deuteronomy 21 online in the New International Version

 

v.15 - Your mind can't help thinking of Joseph's triumph over Reuben in this context,where Jacob quite clearly favoured the son of his loved wife, and, in this case, God supported it. There are a number of occasions when the younger is picked over the older by God - Jacob over Esau, Ephraim over Manasseh, Samuel over the sons of Peninnah, Solomon over his older brothers, etc. This demonstrates that God is able to (and does) override these laws on occasions when it furthers his purpose. We, however, cannot be a respecter of persons in this way, as we do not have this knowledge.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.10 - taken them captive - Hebrew 'captured a captive' the same Hebrew phrase is found in Psalm 68:18 and we can reflect on the way that this is used in the New Testament. Ephesians 4:8 To speak of the call of the gentiles. Thus we see that the taking of the captive as a wife was a form of deliverance. All the principles of marriage come into force and the woman was to become a proselyte. So this is a pattern of the redemption of the gentiles.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.3,4 - The detail required here - the perfection of the situation - unsullied, as it were, by man - both the beast and the ground where the killing took place. The picture is one of Jesus and his purity in performing God's purpose, but I can't help asking, on these occasions where the specified animal is female, whether the implication is also toward the sacrifice that needs to be made by the bride as well as the groom. It surely represents the way that those who would follow in Jesus footsteps are covered by the grace of God and so presented righteous in his sight. Any thoughts anyone?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
21:23 'he that is hanged is accursed' (Galatians 3:13) Bu this would apply to anyone who was hanged.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:18 The 'stubborn' son who doesn't listen to the father's instruction is led astray by the 'stubborn' woman (Proverbs 7:11)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
21:21 The way that the nation were to deal with the 'stubborn son' - that is the son who would not listen to the reproof forms the basis for the way in which the fornicator (, 1Cor 5:13) should be dealt with - not that he should be stoned but that, as Corinthians has it, the 'evil' should be removed. This is the issue. The removal of the evil to remove the temptation for others.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.1-9 Here we have the proceedure to be followed after the finding of a victom of an uncertain murder. The elders and priests of the nearest city take an heifer that has not been wrought with, and bring it into an uncultivated place of running water. There they slay the beast, wash there hands over it, and seek forgiveness for innocent blood for the people of Israel.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

If a dead body was found outside a city, the elders of that city had to wash their hands and to say that they were innocent of the blood.  I wonder if Pontious Pilate knew about this law, or was it just a "coincidence", when he proclaimed he was innocent of Christ's blood?


 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

V.9 Yahweh is concerned with purging the guilt of shedding innocent blood in Israel.  He allows the perpetrator of the death not to be identified, for now, although He knows who it is. 

There are some strong echoes of Christ here:

V.4 The heifer was slain outside the city to cover sin (Heb 13:12).

Vs.6,7 the proclamation of innocence in the shedding of blood (Matt 27:24).

V.23 Hanging on a tree is cursed of God (Gal 3:13).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

21:6-8    The washing of hands and speaking of innocent blood provided Pilate with a way of responding to the charges brought against Jesus – Matt 27:24.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

21:4  Here and in the matter of the cities of refuge the ‘elders of the city’ stood as representatives of all the people. They were not to lord it above their brethren. Rather they were to execute righteous judgement and accept the responsibility for and educate the people of the city. In like manner if any of us have positions of responsibility in the ecclesia we should use that for the benefit of all rather than self aggrandisement.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

21:18-21 It was a severe law that was enacted in this case, but you will notice that both parents consent was required to prevent the abuse of it. The law was wise and beneficial. The punishment was that to which blasphemers were doomed (Lev 24:23); parents are considered God's representatives, and invested with a portion of His authority over their children.

 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

13:6-11The authority of parents over their children is absolute in the law fo Moses, to the extent that they could have a disobedient child killed. Notice that there is no provision for appeal by any other person, nor are other withnesses required (v18-21). This law is mirrored in the law against disobeying judges, found in Deut 17:9-13, against false accusations in 19:18-20, and finally against turning to another God (13:6-11).

In each and every one of these cases, the people had to get involved in the stoning, and in each and every case the reason is given "that they shall hear and fear". These laws were designed to uphold the authority of the parent, the judges, the common man himself, and especially God. It is likely these sentences were very rarely caried out, but it was these laws and the fear they induced that held the very fabric of society together. It was the turning away from God's laws that led to its break-down (Isa 3:5,12).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Rob

21:7    Whilst the details of how to deal with a matter of a person found dead in the field sounds just a formality it is clear that if the elders of the city were to fulfil the requirements of this law they would have to make diligent enquiry in the city before making their pronouncement. Likewise we should not make rash statements without searching out the matter.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

Vs.15-17 Yahweh demands doing the right thing even though it might not be what the person wants to do. Unfortunately, in today’s society, the things people want to do take precedence over doing the right thing. Furthermore, many do not even know the right thing to do in a given circumstance.

Vs.22,23 Although Jesus was an innocent man, He was counted as a criminal (Isa 53:12). Therefore, His body was taken down from the cross and buried before the end of the day to fulfil the Law (Matt 5:17).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

t 21:22-23 In Isa 50:5 Jesus, in spirit, says he was not rebellious. However he was hanged on a tree – in violation of the law. He did not deserve to die so the grave could not hold him Acts 2:24


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.18-21 Contrast this practice with an incident that recently took place here in Quebec. 

A schoolgirl had been rude to her father.  And so, the father told her that for her rudeness she was grounded and not allowed to go on a school field trip which was coming up.  The schoolgirl was very upset about this and took her father to court.  The court agreed with the daughter that she be allowed to go on the trip.  And so the father appealed the case to a higher court which also agreed with the girl.

The father has one legal option left, and that is to take the case to the Supreme Court of Canada.  At the moment, it is not known if he will take that step or not.  In any event, the incident does not say much for supporting parental authority.

The rights of the child have surpassed the effective role of parenting.  It is getting more difficult to deal with the blessed little tax deductions.

We are surely living in the end times.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

21:23 The Roman act of crucifixion would defile the land as those crucified were left hanging for days on the crosses. Jesus was not. Not because the Jews wanted to keep this element of the law. But rather because the Passover was coming and they did not wish to compromise their scruples.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 2 - Song of Solomon 1
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Song of Solomon 1 online in the King James Version
Listen to Song of Solomon 1 online in the New International Version

 

v.1 - There are other examples of songs - Isa.5:1, 1Kings 4:32. Was this a 'special' song - just one, or is it a collection of some, or all, of the one thousand and five? It is after a Song of Songs.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
There is a list of quotations made from the book of Song of Solomon on the Study Site. Select 'Cross References' from the Topics Menu or 'Song of Solomon' from the Books Menu.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.3 - The beauty of Jesus is such that he is loved by the pure. The concept of virgin is always associated with this unsullied purity. It is the state which we attain through love and the grace of God. - Matt.25:1-13
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

Picking up three of the links in John 4

feedest
John 4:34
at noon
John 4:6
rest
John 4:6

We see that the woman coming to the well, despite being a Samaritan and not living with her husband, was a potential candidate for marriage to the Bridegroom.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
ADVICE FOR LOVERS
In today's society there are too many people who have problems in their marriage and relationships. About one third of children at the moment come from a broken home. When Jesus said that in the last days people would be marrying and giving in marriage, I wonder if what he meant was that they would be getting married two or three times, and divorced in between. But there is a preventative lesson we can learn from these two chapters. None of us is perfect and if we let ourselves dwell on the imperfections of our spouse we will the ideas more and more, comparing them with others who begin to look more perfect than our spouse. Instead we should have the attitude of the lovers in this song. They saw in each other only the good things. They accentuated their positive attributes and eliminated the negatives. Build your spouse up in your mind as beautiful and lovely, someone to be desired - in the same way the lovers do in this song. I believe this attitude can go a long way to saving many marriages. Try it in yours.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
:8 The maiden, not knowing the way, was advised to follow in the footsteps of the flock and remain by the shepherd - the pattern of how we should respond to the call of Christ. We do not know the way and so should follow in the footsteps of those faithful who are walking in the way.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
1:9-14 The description of the woman draws on language used in the tabernacle - see the link above to the study site. But there is one piece of language from Ezekiel 16 - the adulterous Israel - showing us that falsehood can often be paraded as truth.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.7  The Groom is a shepherd, and he leads his flock to the green pastures of the Word.(Psa 23:2, John 10:27) Moreover, as a good shepherd, he provides rest and shelter for the flock while the sun is directly overhead. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

Solomon wrote these 12 Songs, which have been condensed into our 8 chapters. Chapter1 has the first Song from Song 1:2-8, where the Bride tells of her love for her Bridegroom. The 2nd Song runs from Song 1:9-2:7and is probably a conversation between Him and her. He tells her how much he admires her (Song 1:9-11), and she replies in Song 1:12-14 and says how well she has prepared herself for Him. Then He says she is beautiful (Song 1:15), and she says the same back to him (Song 1:16,17). There’s a real, and pure, and genuine love between these two.
NB: I have taken much of this information from the book by Brother R.W. Ask (my copy undated).


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

1:4 When the king took the bride into his chamber is speaks of marriage. We are to be invited to the marriage supper of the lamb – Rev 19:9 – but only if we manifest the lovely characteristics of the bride seen in place in the Song of Solomon.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

Song of Solomon: the Bible has 5 (5 is thought by many to suggest grace or mercy) poetic books singing the story of Divine grace and mercy. The books are Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon (is about the sweet intimacy of communion with Christ). On one level the Song of Solomon suggests allusions to his chief bride, the daughter of Pharoah, but the more spiritual meaning is likely about Christ (the lover) and his bride (the beloved) being Jews and Gentiles in Christ. Some feel the book has 12 songs with the first 6 being the bride selected from Israel and the last 6 being the bride selected from the Gentiles with Christ being the Bridegroom for both. The first 6 songs are divided 1:2-8, 1:9--2:7, 2:8-17, 3:1-5, 3:6--4:7,4:8--5:1. The last 6 songs are divided 5:2--6:10, 6:11-13, 7:1-9, 7:10--8:4, 8:5-7, 8:8-12. After these 12 songs there is a final prayer from the groom. .....Much of this was gleaned from The Song of Solomon by H.P. Mansfield p12,13,15,21-23.

 


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

1:9 The word ‘compared’ <01819> is translated ‘similitude’ Hos 12:10 when the prophet explains how God reveals Himself. We should, therefore, conclude that the Song of Solomon is presenting a picture. That picture is a revelation from God about a relationship.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

1:14   The fruitfulness motif identifies the bridegroom with the fruitful land of Israel. As we read through the book be alert to similar language. It helps us to appreciate that this is not a simple love story but a parable of the love that the bride and her groom have for the inheritance promised to those who share Abraham’s faith.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

The Song of Songs is generally attributed to the writing of Solomon, although some have suggested it might have been Isaiah who wrote it. This work, by Solomon, is ironic as it centers upon a true love relationship between one man and one woman. Solomon had 1000 wives and concubines, from different nations, who eventually became responsible for turning him to idolatry (1Kin 11:4). Hardly a true love story there! In fairness, Song of Songs was probably written before Solomon became old and was persuaded to become an idolater.

The true love story in this work is really an allegory between Yahweh and His people. By extension, it is the relationship between Christ and His ecclesia.

The sensual content and nature of this work makes some people uncomfortable. In fact, according to both Origen (185- 254 AD) and Jerome (347-420 AD), Jewish leaders would not let anyone less than thirty years of age read Song of Songs. Their reasoning was that a level of maturity was needed to understand the underlying import of the work.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

FRAGRANCE OF LOVE

 

It was more than her good looks. It was more than the sound of her voice. It was her presence, her actions, her love and her spirit that attracted him. Though the room might be full of people, though he might lose sight of her and be listening to other people, he could sense she was close.

 

She said, "While the king was at his table, my perfume spread its fragrance." (Song 1:2) Just as perfume will catch our attention in a room full of people even though we cannot see it or hear it, so the beloved captured her man's attention as she spread the perfume of her love. Love is not seen in good looks, nor is it heard in the sound of a voice. Like a perfume, love is experienced. It is found in the good deeds, kind words, sacrifices, joy and faithfulness of another person.

 

The bride also describes her lover as, "a satchet of myrrh resting between my breasts." (v.13) He too, was spreading the fragrance of his love for her.

 

We cannot base our relationships on good looks, a great voice or physical strength. All these will fade. Instead, we need to commit to spreading the fragrance of love for each other each and every day. No matter how we look, the fragrance of kindness, goodness, joy and faithfulness will last a lifetime.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Robert

1:4 The woman who calls to the man to bring her into his chambers echoes the song of loves – Psa 45:15


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.1 The title represents the most excellent song (song above all songs).  The phrasing Song of Songs is a Hebrew idiom that expresses a superlative. Other like it includes:

-Holy of Holies meaning the most holy (Exo 29:37).

-Heaven of heavens meaning the highest heaven (Deut 10:14).  

-Lord of lords and King of kings meaning the supreme ruler (Rev 17:14).

The King in this song is ultimately Jesus, and the bride is His ecclesia.  Then this song is the most excellent song because no relationship is greater.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

1:17 The Cedar beams echo part of the structure of Solomon’s temple – 1Kin 6:9


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Acts  13
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Acts 13 online in the King James Version
Listen to Acts 13 online in the New International Version

 

v. 8 Elymas (Barjesus) was a word of Arabic origin meaning 'wise'. He epitomises the wisdom of the world, which is foolishness with God., hence he is referred to in v.10 as the enemy of all righteousness. But remember - the sorcerers in Egypt were able to copy many of the wonders done by God with their enchantments. Ex.7:11-13. Let us therefore beware not to follow the wrong ways.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.17-41 The use of a summary of Old Testament history repeats Stephen’s approach in Acts 7 and echoes a number of Old Testament passages where the history of Israel is used as a lesson for the people - Psalm 78 105 106 . Psalm 78 demonstrates that the history of Israel was a ‘parable’ inasmuch as it contained lessons that had to be learnt by those who experienced God’s hand in their lives. We should likewise see the hand of God at work in our lives. An enjoyable exercise in this section of Acts is to list the quotations from the Old Testament and follow up the quotations. This will develop a more profound understanding of the Old Testament teaching of the coming of Messiah. It will also help us to develop a Scriptural approach to our own exposition.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
:20 - Here we see a period of 450 years applied to the judges. According to most estimates, the time which we think of as the Judges - from Othniel to Samuel is only 330 years (approx). If in fact you project back 450 years from the end of the 'reign' of Samuel as a judge, you arrive at the time when the Israelites came out of Egypt. So is Paul here telling us that Moses and Joshua were the first 2 judges?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
13:5 Whilst today the word 'minister' is used to speak of someone who has a degree of importance the Greek for 'minister' here is a nautical word used to describe one of the men who was an oarsman on a battle galleon. It is not just one of the oarsmen, though. It speaks of one of the men who were on the lower deck, underneath other men who, like him, were chained to their seats. So this lower or under oarsman worked in the filth which was a consequence of his working environment.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:3 The laying on of hands was not for the purpose of giving of the Holy Spirit. Those sending Paul and Barnabus wished to identify themselves with the work.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Moses was definitely a judge. In answer to the question above from v.20, in Ex. 2:14, God made Moses a prince and a judge. Ex. 18:13-22, is the clearest reference to the work of Moses as a judge.

It is not as clear regarding Joshua, but presumably, he followed in Moses' footsteps in this regard.

Moses, like our Lord, was prophet, priest, king, Deut. 33:5; judge, mediator, etc


Jean Cheetham [Moorestown New Jersey (US)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Jean
V.50  It is important to note that it was always the Jews who gave opposition to the spreading of the Gospel. For the most part, the heathen authorities at this time did not oppose the apostles and those with them. It was certain individuals who opposed Paul, but they were not the rulers of the country nor the city. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
v.17 - Here we are reminded that it is God's prerogative to exalt, not our own (Matt 23:12), and that it is the humble and contrite and of low degree that he chooses for this (Luke 1:52).
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

 

Interesting that Elymas had opposed the Truth as Saul (Paul) had done.  He also received the same temporary set-back vs.10,11.  I wonder if he repented.

On his travels, Paul used the synagogues as a forum for exhortation.  As a Jew, he was welcomed to speak.  His welcome was eventually worn out, as the message of the Gospel became a threat to the establishment

 After preaching in the synagogue at Antioch, he exhorted in the synagogues at: Iconium (14:1); Thessalonica (17:1); Berea (17:10); Athens (17:17); Corinth (18:4); Ephesus (18:19).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
13:15 I don't know whether it was usual to ask complete strangers to give the 'word of exhortation' in the synagogue. I doubt it. So we must conclude that Paul (Saul) was already known to the ruler of the synagogue in Antioch in Pisidia.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

Paul came into prominence at Antioch as the result of the actions of Barnabas, and before long he was to increase still further. while Barnabas was to decrease. Note the events recorded in this chapter
Banabas heads the list, while Saul is placed last
Barnabas and Saul
Paul and his company
Paul and Barnabas
So we see the leader gives way to his protege, and Barnabas with complete lack of self interest is pleased and willing to have it so. We see here the quality of humility. The man who has done so much to bring Paul effectively into the Gosple work, now sees the day when he is supplanted by his companion. He might well have spoken again the words of John the Baptist "He must increase, but I must Decrease"


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

13:42 It reads as if there were gentiles in the synagogue as well as Jews. So it is not surprising that they wanted to hear more of the message by contrast to the Jews. The Jews would feel convicted by Paul’s words. The gentiles would appreciate that the gospel offered more to them than being Jewish proselytes.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
Paul's address recorded in this chapter, and the speech of Stephen deal with the history of Israel, but Stephen is concerned with the Messiah, Moses, and the tabernacle, while  Paul, is only concerned with the major events, which led up to the coming of Jesus. Stephen shows that Moses is the mediator, Paul emphasises the kingly descent of Jesus.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John

13:41 The use of Hab 1:5 might seem an odd use of the prophet. The prophet was telling Israel that He was going to use the Chaldeans to punish the Jews. The relevance of the passage here is that God is going to do something unexpected (at least as far as the Jews were concerned) – He was going to call the gentiles to the gospel.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
Paul and Barnabas set off on their first missionary journey. Going first to the island which was Barnabas’ home they preached there, and actually through God’s help they converted the deputy, or proconsul. What a blessing! Surely God was telling them that His new Christianity was intended for rulers as well as ordinary folk (Acts 13:12).  Then, on the second week of preaching in Antioch almost the whole city came together to listen to the Gospel
(Acts 13:44). God was really encouraging these two brave men.

David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to David

13:4    Being ‘sent forth by the Holy Spirit’ means that specific direction as to where they should go had been given by a spirit guided teacher in the ecclesia.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.20 The statement in this verse seems to contradict 1Kin 6:1. Thus, opinion is divided as to whether the 450 years pertains to the time before the Judges, or to the time of the duration of the Judges.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael
 

In this chapter we have we have the great shining forth of the gospel message, “unto the uttermost part of the earth” Acts1v8. We have a list of names which have nothing to do with a genealogy and one wonders what might be the significance of them. When we look at them they deliver a very clear message.

The Son of Rest [Barnabas (921)]has heard [Simeon(4826)] those in darkness[Niger (3526) blackness] and has sent his light [Lucius(3066)] giving comfort [Manaen (3127)] to those who desire him. [Saul (4569]

Saul and Barnabas were separated to do this work and when they sailed from Seleucia 4581 (white light) that light of the gospel shone forth. The Jew Bar-jesus was blinded by pride, the perversity of his heart, but in others like Sergius Paulus (3972 little) whose heart was humble enough to receive it, it shone. The attitude of Bar-jesus is reproduced on a larger scale by the Jews of Antioch, who for envy (pride) spoke, “contradicting and blaspheming”. They were blinded to the light, their hearts could not receive the gospel word. “It was necessary that the word of God should first be spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life,lo we turn to the Gentiles. For so hath the Lord commanded us,saying, I have set thee to be a light of the Gentiles, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth” Acts 13 v46-47                see also Is 60v1-5, Luke 2v32, Phil2v15,Prov 4v18,Matt5v16


Richard Snelling [Swansea]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Richard

13:10-11 The opposition of Elymas the sorcerer to God’s righteousness and his subsequent blindness ‘ for a season’ matches Saul’s – later Paul’s – experience.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

God (who can't die) raised Christ from the dead - Acts 13:30;1Tim 6:16.

Christ was seen by people before and after his resurrection but God can't be seen by people - Matt 14:13,19,20,21,22,26;Matt 15:29,30,36,38;Acts 13:31;1Tim 6:16;John 1:18;1John 4:12.

God raised Jesus His begotten son as prophesied - Acts 13:32-33;Psa 2:7;Isa 53:11-12;Mark 8:31;Mark 10:32-34.

God raised His son Jesus, who didn't decay, and will give him the blessings promised to David - Acts 13:34-35;Isa 55:3;2Sam 7:16,12,13;Psa 16:10.

David died and his body decayed unlike Christ's resurrected body which did not decay - Acts 13:36-37.

David never ascended to heaven, however Christ did - Acts 2:32-34;Psa 110:1. Psalm 110:1 reads - "The Lord [(3068) - 'Yahweh' - i.e. God ] said to my Lord [(113) 'adon' meaning 'sovereign/controller human or divine, lord, master, owner' i.e. Christ], Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool."


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles
v 36 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
8. The Wilderness Journey from Egypt to Canaan was 40 years long. Exo 16:35 Num 14:33 Num 32:13 Deut 2:7 Deut 8:2,4 Deut 29:5 Josh 5:6 Neh 9:21 Psa 95:10 Acts 7:36 Acts 13:18 Heb 3:9,17. Go to Gen 12:1-5 for more about First Principles>Kingdom of God>Existed in the past
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger
v 19,20 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment
1. The conquest of the land was followed by a period of the Judges Acts 13:19,20. This ended when the people rejected God and chose a king 1Sam 8:1-22
Go to
Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning.

Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

 

V.1 Simeon was black (Niger means black).  He probably was a proselyte from North Africa. Lucius was a Jew from Cyrene (North Africa).  Perhaps Simeon and Lucius were associated in North Africa before they came east.

V.9 This is the first time that the name Paul is recorded. Saul (Hebrew Shaul meaning asked, sought).  Saul, the first king of Israel, was sought out to be the monarch (1Sam 10:21).

Saul in the New Testament was sought out by Jesus to work for Him (Acts 9:15). After taking Christ’s commission Saul used his Roman name Paul (Latin Paulus meaning little).  Perhaps, the new name signified to him humility as being not only new to the Truth, but also as being a former persecutor (1Cor 15:9). In 1 Cor 15:9 the word least (Greek elachistos) means short (smallest in size and dignity).  The name Paul fits this description.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
Acts 13:22-23 First Principles>Sure mercies of David>King
This is an everlasting covenant sworn to David, and it did not take place in David's lifetime
2Sam 23:3-5 but there will be a future fulfilment Psa 89:3-4. Psa 132:11 is quoted in the New Testament and applied to Jesus Acts 2:30, Acts 13:22-23. This shows that Jesus will be the future King.
For more about the King, go to
2Sam 7:12-16.
Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

13:23-31 Paul has been giving a potted history of God’s dealing with Israel and now he passes on to speak about John the Baptist and Jesus in the same context. There is no distinction between God’s work in the Old Testament times and in the New Testament times.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter