May 7

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Deuteronomy  24
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Deuteronomy 24 online in the King James Version
Listen to Deuteronomy 24 online in the New International Version

 

v.19 - 21 This provision forced the Israelite to be conscious of the needs of the disadvantaged in the community. What practical things we can find in our own communal lives to forces this point into our consciousness?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 1 - We were surprised, when we looked, how many times Jesus refers to this law, and related issues of adultery etc. Some of these passages are parallel, but not all. Matt.5:31-32, 19:7-9, Mark 10:4-12, Luke 16:18, 20:29-38.
Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Roger
v.5 - What do we think to this as a principle of living then? Does anyone know anyone who has done it?
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
24:18 There are four occasions in Deuteronomy (15:15 16:12 24:18 22) when Israel were told to remember that they were bondmen in Egypt. The fact that they were bondmen was to help them to appreciate that they had to keep the ordinances of the Lord.

Likewise we should appreciate that we were bondmen to sin and, now being redeemed, we should serve our redeemer.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:16 Every man is responsible for his own sins. Some have seen a problem when comparing this verse with the way that God visits iniquity to the 'third and fourth generation' (Exodus 20:5 etc). There is no contradiction. The Exodus reference to the generation which died in Egypt because of their rebellion (Ezekiel 20:8) and the fourth generation is that which fell in the wilderness because of their rebellion (Ezekiel 20:21).
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
24:12 In saying that the one who has taken a pledge of a debtor should not 'sleep with his pledge' the requirements of Exo 22:26 are being re-stated.

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.4  We are told in this verse that if the woman be not defiled by another man, she may be received back again. Although divorced, Israel has not married again. For two thousand years the nation has been without true religion, yet neither has it gone into apostasy.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

The law of gleaning (Deut 24:19-22) was a wonderful provision for the stranger, the fatherless and the widow. God didn't decree communism, but He did encourage a welfare state.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

V.1  It seems that prior to this divorce decree, a man could put away his wife for anything that displeased him about her.  This afforded the woman no protection as she was dependent upon her husband for livelihood.  For this hardness of heart (Matt 19:8) Moses insisted that a written divorce decree be given to the spurned wife.  This public declaration allowed her to re-marry, which, in turn, allowed her continued support. 

In the time of Jesus there was a rabbinical debate as to the reason Moses granted divorce.  Some argued that any reason would do, while others submitted it was for immorality of some kind.  It was against this background that the Pharisees asked Jesus the challenging question of (Matt 19:3).  Jesus refused to be drawn into the current debate but stated the divine ideal of marriage (Matt 19:4-6).  When questioned about Moses' provision of divorce, Jesus explained the reason (Matt 19:7,8) (see paragraph above) but also re-iterated the divine ideal.

Jesus then made the controversial statement of (Matt 19:9).  Some argue that in this so-called exceptive clause, Jesus was stating a law which allowed divorce under this particular circumstance.  Others maintain that He was merely pointing out that divorce would leave an adulterous situation (if re-marriage would occur).  Thus, staying married (or remaining single Matt 19:10-12) would continue to meet the divine ideal. 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

 

Apart from Yahweh's demonstration (Exo 4:6),  Miriam's was the first recorded incident of leprosy (Num 12:10).  For her to be recovered and to be accepted back into the community, she first had to be separated (Num 12:14,15).  The reminder of Miriam concerning leprosy and Israel (vs.8,9), conveyed the need for separation and cleansing before being received back into the community. 

The same procedure applies to someone who has greatly erred in the ecclesia of Christ.  Sometimes a separation is needed from the offending party for him/her to re-consider his/her responsibility in the offending matter, to seek forgiveness (cleansing), and be received back into fellowship (community). 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

24:10-11                Human society would teach that a man had a right to collect the pledge. However, out of respect to the debtor, the one to whom the debt was owed had to rely on the integrity of the one in debt.  The inference is that if the debtor did not bring the pledge out then the one waiting for the pledge would just have to accept that the pledge was not going to be handed over.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

24:15 The principle behind this verse is that we should have total integrity. We do not wait to pay our bills until the final demand arrives. We should not put off until tomorrow what we should do today.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
REMEMBER AND GIVE
 
On remembering that they were slaves in Egypt, Israel were given a responsibility to have compassion on those who were in the same situation as they had been in. God said, "Do not deprive the alien or the fatherless of justice, or take the cloak of the widow as a pledge. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and the LORD God redeemed you from there. That is why I command you to do this." (Deut 24:17-18) And when Israel harvested their crops they were to leave some and not go back and check the harvest a second time in order that the poor could find something to eat. "Leave what remains for the alien, the fatherless and the widow. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt. That is why I command you to do this." (v.21,22)
 
We were not slaves in Egypt, but we were sinners, separated, or alienated, from the promises of God, without God as our father and without Christ as our husband. When we remember this and think about the sad, hopeless state we were in before we were brought to God, it should fill us with compassion for those in the same position.
 
Let us give those who are alienated from God, who do not have the LORD as their father, and are not in a relationship with Christ, the same blessings of hope we have been given.  Remember and Give.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert
24:15 It was normal for hired servents to be paid at the end of each day (Matt 20:8). For a master to defraud the laborer of his hire, or to withhold his wages for the night was contrary to the law (Lev 19:13). It could, or would have put the worker and his family to a very difficult time. The hired servant was for the most part both poor and needy.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

24:8-9           Whereas leprosy  may be seen as a condition that chances upon a man when we read the laws regarding cleansing in Leviticus when comment about leprosy here which is then developed into ‘remember Miriam’ causes us to appreciate that leprosy stands for sin. The leprosy that came upon Miriam was an outward manifestation of what was going on in her heart. Leprosy, therefore, was to remind Israel that mankind were sinners.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

24:1-2 Much dispute occurs about the way in which this provision under the law of Moses should be applied today. Suffice it to say that Jesus says that the provision was made because of the hardness of heart of the individual who sought to use its provision – Matt 19:8


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.6 Corn was ground daily.  The upper millstone lay snugly on top of the lower millstone.  There was a small aperture in the top stone in which to pour the corn to be ground.  If one of these stones were to be taken as a pledge, the owner would be deprived of his daily food supply.

V.7 Kidnapping carried the death penalty under the Law.  In modern western law, convicted kidnappers are given jail terms.

Vs.10-13 Kindness, consideration, and respect for the dignity are shown to the borrower.  A poor man’s cloak was the only covering that he would have for the night.

Vs.14,15 In the Ancient Near East hired servants were paid at the end of each day (Matt 20:2). To withhold payment would present hardship for a servant and his family. 

V.16 See Eze 18:14-20.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

The debt of sin and poverty of divorce

The laws here given for debt can be applied to the laws given for marriage. This could be why they are mixed together in this chapter. For example:

v19-20 the principle of not being too exact in harvesting your goods from the field. This is to provide for others who are less able to provide. So also with righteousness. There are some who are less able to act righteously than others. So if there is some dispute over which way of applying the law, don't be too exact about it. In other words, v24 says a woman with a blemish can be divorced and therefore remarry, whereas 22:13-21 says a defiled woman should be stoned to death. Now, could you say that the defilement is a blemish? Of course. So you can now choose which of these two laws to apply, because they are in direct contradiction. You have the right to apply the law exactly (fully harvest the field, leaving nothing left over), or be merciful and apply it in spirit (harvest most of it, but leave plenty lying around, and turn a blind eye to a sheave you might have accidentally left in the field). God is saying: be merciful and take account of human nature!

Jesus takes up these hidden principles of the law time and again when he encourages us to love and forgive. Look into the context of each law, and you will see similar lessons to these examples every time. We should challenge any brother or sister who is too enthusiastic in applying laws within the body of Christ.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob
Deut 24:7;1Cor 5:9-13.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

24:15 'lest ... unto the Lord' is a fundamental principle, that God will interne for the oppressed wronged by a brother. Though the intervention may not be immediate. This principle passes into New Testament use – James 5:4


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
The principle of v15 is very hard to apply in todays society. The norm in business is to pay within 30 or 60 day terms. Business theory will tell you to leave off paying your creditors as long as possible, and obtain money from you debtors as soon as possible so that you can trade with the cash you have in hand. But applying God's principles is the wisest course of action in the end. We should be careful, where possible, not to be influenced by the worlds way of doing business which leads to the poverty and misery we can see around us.
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob
Reading 2 - Song of Solomon 4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Song of Solomon 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to Song of Solomon 4 online in the New International Version

 

v.11 The use of the 'honeycomb' in Scripture is interesting. Consider these uses.
Psalm 19:10 The Word of God is like an honeycomb
Proverbs 5:3 The strange woman is like an honeycomb
Proverbs 16:24 Pleasant words are like an honeycomb
here The bride is like a honeycomb

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 16 - Gardens go right through Scripture, from start to finish - Eden - Gen.2:8-9, Ahab's herb garden - 1Kings 21:2, Royal Gardens in various places - 2Kings 21:18, Esther 1:5, The garden of Joseph of Arimathea - John 19:41, The garden of Gethsemane - John 18:1. See also Isa.5:1-7, Song 4:12, 5:1, 6:2,11. Beware because Israel was an empty vine - Hos.10:1 - don't be like that.
Roger Sharpe [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Roger
v.8 - This concept of looking up - is this like 'seeking those things which are above'? - Col.3:1,2
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Consider these links with Proverbs 5 and 7

4:5 Two breasts Proverbs 5:19
4:11 Lips drop as an honeycomb Proverbs 5:3
4:14 Cinnamon Proverbs 7:17
4:14 Myrrh Aloes Proverbs 7:17

Whilst the bridegroom can view the bridge in loving terms Proverbs shows us that the harlot can portray the same characteristics. We might think we are Godly but it may be that our life belies what we claim.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:14 Myrrh and Aloes occur rarely together inScripture - Psalm 45:8 Proverbs 7:17 and John 19:39. The link with Psalm 45 - a Psalm of the resurrection - shows that here we are looking at the bride prospectively in the kingdom, having been raised from the dead.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

4:1 Whilst we probably would bot think to describe a woman's hair as like 'goat's  hair' we should  not let ouw western attitude mould our thoughts. Goat's hair was used in the construction of the coverings in the tabernacle Exo 26:7

The things of God are lovely to those who love Him but to the world's eyes they are unappealing.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.1-5  The King commends the beauty of the Bride, listing seven points of beauty.
EYES
HAIR
TEETH
LIPS
TEMPLES
NECK
BREASTS


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Vs.9,10,12 show that the husband's wife is also considered his sister.  Abraham claimed Sarah to be his sister to the King of Gerar (Gen 20:2) (she was literally his half-sister Gen 20:12).  Isaac also claimed the same status for Rebekah, also in Gerar (Gen 26:7,9).  Jacob married two sisters (Leah and Rachel) who figured prominently in the development of the twelve tribes.  Thus, the patriarchs of the early ecclesia had sister/wife involvements. 

Marriages in the first century ecclesia (and beyond) clearly involved sister/wife relationships (1Cor 9:5).  The relationship  of husband and wife mirror Christ and His ecclesia. The fact that the wife is also a sister would indicate that the ecclesia is also a sister to Christ.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

In Psa 37:7-8 we read of those who love the Lord, being hidden under the shadow of His wings. In v9 that it is here that the rivers of life may be found. In Jer 2:13 we read of Israel forsaking God, the fountain of living water, and turning instead to idols.

This water we read of in Song 4:15 is the same living water. Here we find it shut up in the garden which is used to describe the beloved woman. She had that water of life within her. Eze 16:9 has the same water. Here it was used to give life to a young baby girl, passed by on the road and taken pity on by the one who became her husband. She is described as being "poluted in (her) own blood". She is an abandoned baby, cast into a field without even having her navel tied, or her body washed or swaddled (v4). The rest of the chapter describes her as she becomes the same beautiful woman described here in Songs (Eze 16:7-14). In v8-9 she is washed clean and becomes her husband's. The covenant they entered is described by the action of the husband, who spread his skirt over her and covered her nakedness; the same action as hiding under his wings.

God is the husband, and His people Israel are the girl. The marriage covenant was them declaring to Him "all the things you command we will do" at Sinai when they became His people. During the rest of the chapter we see how they turned away from him, and "forsook the fountain of living waters", rather than keeping them within the garden.

Israel is but an example on a national scale of those who belong to God. We may all hide under the shadow of His wings. We may all have our nakedness covered, our sins washed away by the living waters. We may all enter into a covenant with Him. We may all love Him as best we are able. In Heb 10:16-22 we have described in exactly the same terms as in Ezekiel 16 the way in which we may draw near to God through Christ.

The natural feelings we are born with are all designed by God to teach us something about him, when we direct them in a proper manner. The intense feeling of Love, pity, and tenderness we can feel for a spouse is there primarily to demonstrate how God feels for those who Love and serve Him. It is when we realise this that we can fully comprehend how impossible it is for God to leave or forsake us. It is impossible for God to condemn us once we have His Love and remain in it. We may well know the verses which tell us what the gospel is, but it's not until we start thinking of God in these terms that we can really feel pitied, loved, and saved by Him. The links from the Song of Solomon to the passages speaking of God's love are too numerous for us to avoid, and we ought to think of the song in this way if we are at all able.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Rob

The 5th Song runs from Song 3:6-4:7. The first part is a conversation among the bride’s companions, then she speaks of the beauty of her Beloved in Song 3:11. The King then rejoices over His bride in Song 4:1-7.  He declares her to be perfect – obviously a symbol of the saints who have passed the Judgment Seat, and who will share the kingdom with King Jesus.


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

4:8 Mount Hermon is here styled ‘Amana’ and ‘Shenir’ these are two alternative names for Hermon and are what other nations called Hermon . Shenir is the name that the Amorites used Deut 3:9. Amana is related to the river that the Syrians spoke of 2Kin 5:12. The bride is to be associated with gentiles as well as Jews. So we see the call of the gentiles to the marriage.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

4:11  In speaking of the smell of the garents of the bride we see a contrast with Isaac – Gen 27:27 – where he was aiming to deceive. Our Bride Groom cannot be deceived.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

4:11     The garments that smell of Lebanon is echoed in repentant Israel – Hos 14:6 – indicating the odour of redemption.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.8 The Amorite name for Mt. Hermon is Senir. But here we see Hermon and Senir listed as two distinct mountains. It is probable that Senir pertains to a certain part of the Hermon range. If we consider the context of Eze 27:5, Senir would be placed towards Lebanon.

Amana could be associated with either the River Abana or Mt. Amanus in northern Syria.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

4:3 The ‘comely’ speech is not just a pleasant voice. The comeliness is seen in the words that are used. How do we think the Father views the words that we use?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.5 Compare this description with that of the virtuous woman (wisdom) of Prov 5:19.

V.11 From virtuous lips and tongue one would expect to emanate agreeable words (Prov 16:24). One should be cautioned that the words from an evil, flattering woman can also be sweet (Prov 5:3).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

4:1 The bearing of twins – something that shepherds seek for in their sheep – is a metaphor here for fruitfulness.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Acts  18 and 19
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Acts 18 online in the King James Version Listen to Acts 19 online in the King James Version
Listen to Acts 18 online in the New International Version Listen to Acts 19 online in the New International Version

 

18 v.5,6 - Here is Paul acting out the role of the watchman for Israel - Eze. 33:1-5. Yet again they heard the sound of the trumpet but took not warning. Paul was acting in accordance with Eze.33:6, and therefore says 'Your blood be upon your own heads - I am clean'.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

18 v.2 Acknowledging that our actions are determined by the Lord's will is seen in King David. 2Samuel 15:25,26 and restated by his son Solomon Proverbs 19:21 Jeremiah draws the attention of those who would speak falsely to the fact that Yahweh determines actions. Lamentations 3:37 This clear Old Testament concept then passes into New Testament use being seen first in the Lord Luke 22:42 And then in the apostles Acts 18:21 Romans 1:10 15:32 1Corinthians 4:19 16:7 Hebrews 6:3

19 v.3 The mention of individuals who had been baptized of John show that John Baptist's message went further than just the borders of the land of Israel. So we might conclude that the preaching of Jesus was known of in the Roman world outside Jerusalem as well before the Apostles began their preaching.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

ch.18 - This time in Paul's work must have been very rewarding. For 18 months he is working and getting a response in Corinth and then he moved on and got a further great response in Ephesus.

19:7 We often lament that we are not able to be effective in our preaching because we are few in numbers. However the example of Ephesus is a salutary warning against such an attitude. 12 men 'turned the world upside down' with God's help. Do we believe that God is working when we go out preaching? Can he save by few as well as many?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
BURNING SCROLLS
The campaign in Ephesus brought about a number of converts who had to make a massive turn-around in their lives. They were people who had practiced sorcery and it seems that they had been very devoted to their evil practice because the value of their scrolls came to fifty thousand drachmas (50000 days pay, or 137 years pay).
When they devoted themselves to Christ and repented of their past acts they brought their scrolls together and burned them publicly. This meant that there was no turning back to their old way of life - even if they had wanted to. They could not get their old books back and could not afford the money to buy them back. They were committed to a new and Godly Christian life. What they did was a great step of faith, but one that will be rewarded at the return of Christ.

In the same way there must be no turning back to our old way of life once we have committed ourselves to Christ. Just as the sorcerers burnt all their scrolls, so we too must remove every temptation from our lives that might drag us back to where we came from. So let us burn the ties and temptations from our old way of life and dedicate ourselves in faith, wholly and completely, to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert

18:16 In saying 'from henceforth I will go to the gentiles' Paul is not saying that he will never preach to the Jews. In every city Paul first appealed to the Jews and when they rejected the word of God he spoke the message to gentiles. In fact it is a recurring phrase in Acts (13:46, 22:21, 26:17. 28:28)

19:10 Paul spent 2 years in Ephesus. A consequence was that 'all Asia' heard the word (:10, 26) which maybe indicates why Paul was so sad (2 Timothy 1:15) at way the ecclesias in Asia had rejected him.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
18:26  Aquila and Priscilla show an example of a Christ like home. They quietly and privately correct Apollos, they also showed hospitality to Paul, Silas, and Timothy. Acts 18:1; 5
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

18:3 Paul was entitled to 'live of the gospel' (1Cor 9:14) however this little comment about him being a tentmaker and practicing that craft shows that he supported himself as far as he could.

19:21 The detail of journeyings mentioned here helps us to date the writing of the letter to the Romans Rom 15:25 refers to this time.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
Acts 18:6 'Your blood be upon your own heads' was a pretty mean phrase.  Consider these passages: Lev 20:9,11,12, 2Sam 1:16, Eze 18:13
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

 

19:24 Diana was the Roman goddess of fertility that became synonymous with the Greek goddess Artemis.  Other Greek and Roman versions were Aphrodite and Venus.

Throughout the ages other nations had versions of this fertility goddess:

Canaanites - Ashtaroth

Egyptians - Astarte

Moabites - Qudshu

Babylonians and Assyrians - Ashtar 

Eostre (note the similarity to earlier names) is the Anglo-Saxon goddess of the dawn (i.e. fertility).  The term Easter comes from her name. Thus, we should consider the pagan origins of fertility rites; bunnies; eggs etc. at that time of year and avoid involvement in its rituals. 


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
18:3 We can draw a comparison between Peter and Paul. Peter was a fisherman and became a fisher of men. Paul was a tentmaker and became a builder of tabernacles for the Gentiles.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

18:6 ‘Your blood be upon your own head’ quotes Lev 20:9

19:1 This chapter marks the beginning of Paul’s third missionary journey, as it is called.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter
19:21 Although Paul was the great apostle to the Gentiles, he always looked for every opportunity to speak to the Jews. There must have been a synagogue at Rome for him to be so anxious to go there. From Acts 2:10 we know that there were strangers at Rome who came to Jerusalem at Pentecost. These may have had some effect in Paul's decision which, although it was guided by the Holy Spirit, nevertheless was taken by Paul. From Acts 28:17 we know that there was a body of Jews there when Paul eventually got there.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
Spare a minute to look at Aquila and his wife Priscilla. Here in Acts 18:1,2 Paul met them in Corinth, as they had recently been forced to leave Rome. In 1Cor 16:19 this couple were with Paul (probably in Ephesus, see 1Cor 16:8). They sent their love to the Corinthians. And they also had a church, or ecclesia, meeting in their house.  Then when Paul wrote to the Romans they had gone back to Rome, and once again had a church in their house (Rom 16:3-5). What a lovely hospitable couple they were!
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to David

19:7 These 12 men must have been faithfully remembering the words of John the Baptist for some 20 years. What a joy it must have been to them to understand that the one that John had spoken about had come and salvation was available through his name


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

18:6  It might seem strange to say that the Jews ‘opposed themselves’ but in reality that is what happens when one opposes the gospel message. The only person to suffer is the one who opposes – he rejects the offer of eternal life.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

18:5 The encouragement of other is most valuable. We can be willing to do a work but sometimes need the encouragement of others to stimulate us to do the work. Now whilst we are not suggesting that Paul lacked motivation we do notice that the arrival of others to help in the work caused meant the work was expanded.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
Acts 19:8 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Gospel concerns God's Kingdom
The Gospel preached by Jesus and the Apostles concerns the Kingdom of God.
1. Examples of teaching concerning the Kingdom of God
Matt 4:23, Mark 1:14, Luke 8:1, Acts 8:12, Acts 19:8, Acts 20:25, Acts 28:31
For more about the Gospel concerning God's Kingdom, go to Matt 4:23

Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

 

18:3 Paul worked to pay his way. It would have been reasonable for others to pay his way as he was fully occupied in the work of the Lord (1Cor 9:7-9). But, he declined (1Cor 9:15).

19:5 This confirms the necessity to be baptized in Jesus in order to be part of Him and His work.  After baptism the disciples preached in the synagogue.  Their topic was the kingdom of God (19:8). Thus, we see the two elements of the gospel that must be understood for salvation, namely: The kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 8:12).

19:19 The value of the sorcery scrolls which were burned is stated at fifty thousand drachmas. (The Greek drachma was a silver coin having the same value as the Roman denarius, also a silver coin that had the image of Caesar stamped on one side (Luke 20:24).  One denarius was the daily wage given to laborers and Roman soldiers (Matt 20:2).  Thus, the precious ointment which was used to anoint the Lord Jesus was worth about one year's wages (John 12:5).  And so, by the same calculation, the sorcerers scrolls were worth about 140 years' wages.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

18:8 We read that Crispus who was the chief ruler of the synagogue believed. Later in 18:17 we see that Sosthenes was the chief ruler. Was Crispus forced to resign his role because of his new belief? 

You can also see some historical consistency. We read in 18:2 that Claudius had expelled all the Jews from Rome indicating they were out of favour ion the empire. This may explain the total disregard that Gallo, the deputy had for the Jews when they brought Paul to the judgement seat.

19:1-3 These men who were baptized into the baptisim of John were probably disciples of Appollus who first began his preaching in Ephesus 18: 24 preaching the bapisim of John.


Alex Browning [Toronto East, Canada]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Alex

19:6 Here we have Divine confirmation that Paul was n apostle because it was only through the laying on of the hands of the apostles that the holy spirit was conferred – Acts 8:18


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

QUIET INSTRUCTION

 

Apollos was a powerful speaker. He had taught many people about Jesus even though he only knew of the baptism of John. Apollos happend to arrive and begin to teach in the same synagogue that Aquila and Priscilla were attending.

 

Aquila and Pricilla were also believers in Jesus, but they had a more thorough understanding about Jesus than that which Apollos had. They could have eneterd into a debate with Apollos right then and there as he taught the people in the synagogue, but Aquila and Pricilla chose not to. If they had done so they may well have put many of the listeners off as they wondered whether even Christians could agree among themselves At the same time they would have pulled into disrepute the character and authority of Apollos in any teaching he did there later on.

 

Instead, Aquila and Pricilla did a very wise thing. "They invited him to their home and explained to him the word of God more adequately." (Acts 18:26) In this way Apolos did not lose face in front of those he was teaching, but understood the message even better, and those he taught would have benefited even more from his lessons.

 

So let's follow the example of Aquila and Pricilla and open our homes in private to those who need encouragement, reproof or instruction. In this way no one needs to lose face and the word of God can spread more effectively.


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Robert