|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| ch.12 - In v.1
of ch.13 we find that
Israel have once again turned from God. This is a direct result of the leadership
recorded in ch.12 - leadership which in God's eyes was either significantly wrong
(v.9),
or of no spiritual consequence, hence no account of their lives. Where will our
lives as spiritual leaders be rated? How full a report would our lives command?
Food for thought. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12
v.4
This strife between tribes in Israel over a trivial matter really, the men of
Ephraim had their pride hurt, and that is all. Is this not like how we sometimes
behave in the ecclesia. The way that Israel behaved towards their brethren can
provide us with an insight into the folly of our own ecclesial actions at times.
13
v.3 The use of the
phrase virgin ... conceive ... bear ... son is found in the following places
[Judges
13:3 5 7 Isaiah 7:14 Matthew 1:23 Luke 1:27-31] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 13
v.6,18 - The significance of names seems to be different in the angelic realm,
though we are given name for some angels. This one would not give his name to
either Manoah or his wife. The same happened with Jacob in Gen
32:29 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:8-15 This small area of Judges covers a period of 25 years and 3 Judges which shows that the book of Judges is concerned to report specific events in the time of the Judges rather than be a detailed historical account of the period. ch 13 - Continuing the theme of the links between Samson and Jesus we note that there are words used here which we later find in Isaiah 9 which are prophetic of Jesus.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:6 The Gileadites were making their brethren 'offenders for a word' (Isaiah 29:21). So they were fighting their brethren who spoke the same language using a small pretext to justify their actions whereas they seemed to accept the presence of the inhabitants of the land who had no knowledge of Yahweh! ch. 13 - Samson was of the tribe of Dan (2). 'Dan' means 'judge' - :12 'order' is the Hebrew word 04941 - 'judgement'. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:4 In that the Gileadites fought with the men of Ephraim we see that the strife was somewhat more than Ephraim being offended that they had not been called to the battle. The Gileadites are accused of not really being part of Israel. So we see surfacing the tension that was there in the time of Joshua Josh 22 where the tribes on the West of Jordan presumed those on the East had fallen away from worshipping 13:2-3 The birth of Samson was miraculous. That is not after the will of man. Manoah's wife got a man with the help of the Lord Gen 4:1. Samson, being born to a barren woman through the intervention of God, is one of a long line of the 'seed of the woman' who was a deliverer of one sort or other. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12: 2 The straight forward answer of Jephthah to the issues of the Ephraimites shows that their charge was false; their complaint of not being treated as confederates and allies was entirely without foundation; and their boast of a ready contribution of their services came with ill grace from people who had purposely delayed appearing till the crisis was past. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
There had been the threat of civil war among the Israelites over the altar built near the Jordan (Josh 22:12). But this incident, in today's chapter was really serious, and 42,000 of Ephraim were killed
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
Ch. 12. The aggressive stance taken by Ephraim with the Gileadites was unfortunate. This is especially true of the fact that Ephraim was not geographically connected to either Gilead or Ammon. The area known as Gilead comprised nearly all of the tribal allotment of Gad and about half of the tribal allotment of East Manasseh (Manasseh was the only tribe to occupy territory on both sides of the River Jordan). Ammon was situated to the east of Gilead. Instead of being glad for their brethren's victory, Ephraim took a fit which cost 42,000 of their lives. Let us take note of this calamitous behavior and always seek peace (Rom 14:19) Ch. 13 The role of a Nazarite was to be dedicated to God. There were certain physical conditions to be followed (Num 6:2-13). Samson was to become a Nazarite for life. The Lord Jesus, like Samson (and Samuel), was dedicated to God from birth. He, therefore, was a Nazarite. However, He came to fulfil the Law and, thus, overrode some of the physical requirements of a Nazarite. We, being followers of the Lord Jesus, are, in effect, spiritual Nazarites, having a life-long dedication to Yahweh. If we keep our vow, we will reap the reward (Col 1:23). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
The approach of the angel to Manoah's wife is very similar to that of Gabriel to Mary. What I find interesting is that the Angel seems to have no interest in talking to Manoah. Maybe this is explained by the fact that she had a much better understanding than he did. She knew it was an Angel. He thought it was a man. She didn't ask Him where He was from, knowing He was from the LORD. Manoah did. She realised that they wouldn't die, but that they had a purpose to fulfil, whereas Manoah, superstitiously declared "We shall surely die, because we have seen God!". He clearly had little personal knowledge of God and His ways, whereas his wife did. However, when we come to chapter 14 (v 3,5,9,16) we see that both parents are mentioned together each time. Both his parents had had a large effect on their son and had dilligently kept the charge committed to them by the Angel. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| 12:5 Taking the ‘passages of Jordan’ has happened twice before Judg 3:28, 7:24 indicating that there was one place which was a good crossing place where people could escape from the land of Israel when pursued by the children of Israel.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 12:7 After judging for only six years we read that Jephthah, a mighty man of valor died, and was buried in Gilead. It would appear that we are not told of all his works, but, he had to be a man of great faith and works, as he is mentioned with other worthies of old by the writer of the letter written to the ecclesia at Jerusalem in the first century (Heb 11:32). John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
12:8 The town of Bethlehem mentioned in is not the celebrated town in Judah. It was one of the towns in the territory of Zebulun, which was situated considerably north of Judah (see Josh 19:15). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
12:1 So again – see Judg 8:1 – complain. Ephraim are beginning to be seen as a tribe who had a high opinion of themselves and who felt that they should be consulted on matters. There is a similar danger that we might feel that we are important and our views should, therefore, be listened to. Such is pride Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
JEALOUSY Jephthah and the men of Gilead had won a great victory. Together they subdued the Ammonites and saved Israel from yet another oppressor. It was not in his own strength that Jephthah was able to do this mighty work, neither was under his own motivation. It was God's plan that this should be Jephthah's work and in God's strength it was achieved. We read, "The spirit of the LORD came upon Jephthah ... and he advanced against the Ammonites. (Judg 11:29) And, "The LORD gave them into their hands." (v.32) When people do great things - and especially when the LORD is behind it - let's not be jealous of the good works God had planned for them to do, but rejoice with them that God's will has been done. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
13:6 The appearance of the man of God (angel) to Manoah's wife, and later to him, was an example of theophany. Theophany is the manifestation of God to people. As Yahweh cannot be seen by anyone (Exo 33:20), He uses other means to show Himself. Common manifestations were: - Angels who appeared in human form - Visions - Non-human displays (e.g. the burning bush that presented itself to Moses). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
13:8 Manoah’s entreaty to God that he might know what they should ‘do unto the child’ might seem a strange thing to ask. After all Moses had instructed the people that they should teach them the law of God. Presumably as the child was to be special he anticipated that something different would be required in the upbringing of the child. The message of the angel is, basically, observe the Nazarite law. His education was to be the same as any other Hebrew boy. The instruction was not the issue, it was Samson’s attitude to it that mattered. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
12:6 The inability of the Ephraimites to pronounce a sh sound is similar to the difficulty of a French person trying to pronounce th when s/he talks English. Unless one is highly skilled in English, the sound will come out as a t, thus betraying their origin. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
13:8-12 Notice we know Samson’s father’s name – Manoah – though his mother is never named. So whilst Samson was a deliverer he was not the ‘seed of the woman’. The focus is on the fact that he is the seed of Manoah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Judg 13:1 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment Go to Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
13:2 Manoah means rest. Through his son Samson, Israel would find rest from forty years of Philistine oppression. 13:16 This is a similar situation to that of Gideon. He offered a meal of hospitality to the angel, and the angel offered it as sacrifice to Yahweh (Judg 6:20,21). 13:18 The word secret (KJV) is better rendered wonderful (ESV). This is descriptive of the Lord Jesus to whom the angels are now subservient (Isa 9:6). 13:20 The angel’s ascension in the flame marked the acceptance of the sacrifice. 13:24 Samson in Hebrew is shimshon which comes from the root shamash meaning to serve. The sun (shemesh) is also derived from the same root. And so, Samson can mean either little one of the sun or little servant. The latter definition better fits the role of Samson. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Judg 12:8-10 - "Ibzan" (78) means "whiteness, splendor or illustrious" - perhaps echoing the glory manifested in Christ (Mark 9:3). Ibzan, like Jesus, was of "Bethlehem" (1035) means "house of bread" (Luke 2:14-16). Ibzan, like Christ, was the father of a multitudinous seed. The repeated mentions of "30" perhaps suggest being fit for service (Luke 3:23;Num 4:3,23,30,35;Gen 41:46;2Sam 5:4), the age Jesus began his ministry. Ibzan judged/led Israel 7 years with "7" thought by many as the number of spiritual perfection. Judg 12:11-12 - "Elon" (356) means "an oak, oak-grove, strength" - Isa 6:13 (the link between 'elon = oak' and Christ); the stump mentioned in Isaiah 6 was to grow again from its roots (Isa 11:1-2); the 'death' and 'resurrection' of this elon would precede the kingdom (Isa 35:6-7). Buried in "Aijalon" (357) means "field of deer, male deer - hart, a place of gazelles" (Isa 35:6-7). "Zebulun" (2074) means "habitation, to dwell with" and perhaps suggests a habitation in the kingdom (Isa 35:6-7). Elon judged/led Israel 10 years with "10" thought by many as the number indicating the perfection of divine order. Judg 12:13-15 - "Abdon" (5658) means "servile, servant". "Hillel" (1985) means "praise, praising (namely God)". "Pirathon" (6552) means "princely" - perhaps echoing that while Christ was a God praising son/servant, he was also a prince. "Amalek" (6002) means "people of lapping (or licking - as with a snake's tongue)", they were Israel's oldest enemy (Num 24:20;Exo 17:8-16;Mic 7:17;Psa 72:9) and perhaps echo the serpent/sin (Matt 12:33-34;23:30-33;Acts 28:3-6) that Christ overcame and will do away with (1Cor 15:24-28). Riding upon an ass signifies a position of rulership in Israel (Gen 22:3,5;Exo 4:20;Zech 9:9-11). There is a parallel between Israel's firstborn and the Ass's firstborn which is identified with Israel - perhaps the concept is to redeem unclean Israel with the lamb (Exo 13:13-15). Abdon, like Christ, had many descendants/children. 40 (or a combination of 40 such as 80) is a number that occurs frequently in Judges and is thought by many as the number indicating "a time of probation, trial and chastisement"; similarly, 30 is thought to indicate "fit for service"; 70 indicates "perfect spiritual order"; 8 indicates "immortality". Some of the above gleaned from The Gospel in the Book of Judges by Ian Giles, pps. 62-66. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
Was Samson a man of the flesh? The final assessment of Samson's character (Heb 11:32-40). Samson a representative of Israel: It was the role of the High Priest to represent Israel. The Nazarite's (Judg 13:5) vow took on aspects of the priestly status (Num 6:3-8;Lev 10:9;Lev 21:5,1). In Samson's (apparent) failures he typifies Israel after the flesh. In his heroic warfare and victory over sin he typifies Jesus, the perfect Israelite and High Priest. Jesus a representative of Israel: Both Christ and Israel were firstborn (Matt 1:25;Exo 4:22), born in land (Matt 2:1; Gen. chs. 12 -35), called out of Egypt (Matt 2:15;Hos 11:1), baptized (Matt 3:13;1Cor 10:2), tempted in the wilderness (Matt 4:1; Exo 15 to Deut 34). Samson a type of Israel: As a representative man Samson typified Israel in historical and prophetic ways. Both Samson and Israel were separated for God's service (Judg 13:5;Lev 20:24-26), married nonbelievers (Judg 14:3;Mal 2:11), wife taken by another (Judg 15:2;Deut 28:30), went whoring (Judg 16:1;Exo 34:15;Judg 2:17), broke their covenant and lost their strength (Judg 16:17;Lev 26:15-20;Psa 106:40-41), became blind and in bondage literally or figuratively (Judg 16:21;2Kin 25:7;Isa 43:8,10;Rom 11:25-27), grinding in captivity (Judg 16:21;Lam 5:13), mocked (Judg 16:23;Deut 28:37). As a Nazarite and a representative man Samson typically lived out the life of Israel. The consequence of this was that the curse fell upon him. Thus Samson bore the iniquities of the nation as did the scapegoat (Lev 16:21-22). In this way Samson (to some extent) suffered like that other representative man, Jesus (Isa 53:5-11). Most of the above is from The Gospel in the Book of Judges by Ian Giles, pps.106-111. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
13:22 Manoah does not show a much perception as his wife. It was she, and not he, who understood the significance of the visitation from the angel. Manoah only feared death having seen the angel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.16
- Here we have a prayer recorded - the prayer of a righteous man. We have very
few prayers recorded exactly, as this one is, and we do well to note its structure,
as it matches with other recorded prayers. The first part of the prayer is praise
of God. This is a very important pre-requisite, as it emphasises the gulf that
is fixed between man and God, and the fact that we realise that it has been bridged
by Jesus, so giving us, as sinful mankind, access to the supremacy of the creator.
(ch.43:10,11). Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 37
v.30 - In speaking
of that which groweth of itself and third year we are
reminded of the Jubilee year [Leviticus
25:11] indicating that
this year was a jubilee or the year of release. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.2
- Shebna, of whom we read quite a lot in connection with Hezekiah, means 'vigour'. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| I make no apology
for repeating this table from chapter 22. The promises to David form such a central
plank of the gospel.
9:7
Throne of David God worked in Isaiah's day because of what he said to David. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :4,
17 In speaking of the 'living God' Hezekiah is clearly contrasting his confidence
upon Yahweh with the idols of Assyria which were no gods. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 37:6-9 This deliverance could be seen as a natural event. Those that were faithless in Israel would not see the hand of God in this deliverance and consequently would not have a basis for trusting that God would work for them when the Assyrians came back. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.29 Like a wild beast led by a ring through the nose, Sennacherib shall be forced back to his own country. This is not the first time this expression is used in scripture. Re Egypt; Eze 29:4; Re Gog, Eze 38:4. It is also used in Job 41:1-2 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Isaiah was an active prophet during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah (Isa 1:1). The time span would be about 740-701 BC. Isaiah's prophecy against Sennacherib concerning his death came true in 681 BC by the hands of his sons (vs. 7,37,38). History and archaeology confirm the event of Sennacherib's death. The Babylonians recorded that his murder was divine retribution for his destruction of Babylon in 689 BC). Thus, the Bible is once again proved accurate through fulfilled prophecy. In this case it is confirmed by secular history. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| THE POWER OF AN ANGEL Imagine being surrounded by the world's most powerful army. Their soldiers are all well armed and practised. Previously they have swept through country after country, and not even the most well defended forces could resist them. They had horses and chariots and were confident of victory. It must be a terrifying situation to be enclosed in a city in this predicament. Hezekiah was the king surrounded by the powerful, undefeated Assyrian army. He could have put his trust in his own army, but that would have failed miserably. Instead he put his trust in God. God's battle strategy must have been extremely humiliating to the Assyrians that remained. 185,000 or more trained soldiers had come out to capture Jerusalem. One angel put them to death in one night! 185,000 strong men could not stand against the power of one angel. We can be sure that this angel has not died in the meantime and neither has he lost his power. If being surrounded by 185,000 armed soldiers would fill us with dread, imagine being surrounded by an angel! For those who believe, angels are not to be feared. Rather we can stand in confidence that angels are ministering spirits sent to serve those who would inherit salvation. (Heb 1:14) The power with us is far greater than any that could stand against us. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
Isaiah's message to Hezekiah set forth three things:
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Isa 37:36 tells us how the siege of Jerusalem ended. God’s angel killed 185,000 of the Assyrians outside the walls of the city. Hezekiah’s prayer was answered. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
37:4,17 In speaking of Yahweh of ‘the living God’ Hezekiah is like David when he went out against Goliath – 1Sam 17:26,36 – the small faithful man who has a giant pitted against him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.33-36; Eze 38:21-23 - Assyria is almost a type of the latter day Gog. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
37:1 Hezekiah being clothed in sackcloth is exactly what God said would happen when the Babylonians came – Isa 22:12 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 37:1 Hezekiah, like his father David, when troubled strengthened himself by going into the house of the LORD to pray. After much prayer he sent messengers to Isaiah seeking an answer from God. As we read the sixth verses we can clearly read that his prayers were heard, so it is with us at all times; our prayers are always heard, there are times however that they may not be answered as quickly as we might like, or we may not receive the answer we may be seeking; but we must always remember that our Heavenly Father knows what is best for each one of us. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.29 The language here is similar to that of Eze 38:4. Gog (the latter-day Assyrian) will be destroyed just as decisively as Sennacherib and his army were. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
37:16 In observing that God had made heaven and earth Hezekiah is making the point that God was the Lord of the world and so the king of Assyria’s words were an affront to God’s position. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.9 Tirhakah originally came from Ethiopia (= Cush = present-day Sudan). He moved north to Egypt when he was twenty years old. Tirhakah became king of Egypt and reigned for twenty-six years from 693 BC until his death in 667 BC. The timeline of v.9 is 701 BC which poses a chronological difficulty. Commentators suggest that, in 701 BC, Tirhakah was acting on behalf of his cousin Sabatoka who was Pharaoh until he died in 693 BC. At that point, Tirhakah became the new Pharaoh. The Egyptian campaign against the Assyrians was unsuccessful, as Yahweh had prophesied. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
37:20 Notice the reason why Hezekiah was asking for deliverance. It was not for his own benefit. It was not even for the benefit of the remnant of the people with him. Rather it was for the benefit of the nations round about. That they might realise that Israel’s God was the true God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.12 Gozan was a place in Assyria to which Israelites were deported after the fall of Samaria (2Kin 17:6). Haran was the place where Abram sojourned after he left Ur. He stayed there until his father Terah died (Gen 11:31,32). Rezeph was a fortress close to Haran. It was Sennacherib who conquered Rezeph. Eden was a place in Mesopotamia. The captured people from Eden were removed to the Babylonian province of Telassar (See also 2Kin 19:12). V.13 These cities were discussed yesterday, except Hena and Ivah which were politically united with Sepharvaim. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
When Hezekiah speaks to Isaiah "this is a day of trouble and rebuke and blasphemy" (v3) he is quoting the words of Isaiah's prophecy from 22:5. Hezekiah was declaring to Isaiah that he believed all his words had come true. Chariots were in the choicest valleys, at the very gate of Jerusalem (22:7 cp 36:6). God had removed the protection of Judah (22:8) namely the water supply that would keep the beseiged people of Jerusalem alive. This water had been gathered together within the city wall using the houses of Jerusalem as building material (22:9-11) yet with little regard to the God who had caused that life giving spring to exist there in the first place (22:11, 37:26). This brook of defence had been dried up by Sennacherib just as Isaiah had said it would (37:25). Hezekiah realised that he was defenceless when he saw the Rabshakeh standing with the soles of his feet in the dried up aqueduct (compare 36:2 and 37:25). Isaiah's reply to Hezekiah is one of joy. Hezekiah had finally realised that the defence of his city was not down to clever water defences, or hiring armies to protect him, but simply in prayer to his God. The same applies to us. But does God have to dry up all our defences before we recognise it? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
37:6 The Assyrian monarch had sealed his fate by blaspheming God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 3
v.3-5 - This passage is not just for women, it simply uses the tendency that
women have rather than men to use external beauty treatment to make a spiritual
point. It is a call to all of us to keep our lives in perspective, to recognise
the 'adornment' which is of the inside, not of the outside. Acts
9:36, 1Tim 2:9,10, 5:10. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3 v.2,53 - chaste / pure. Whilst we might think that this word means sexually pure when speaking of a 'chaste virgin' that is not the sense of the word. As we can see from these passages: 2 Corinthians 7:11 clear 2 Corinthians 11:2 pure Philippians 4:8 pure 1 Timothy 5:22 pure James 3:17 pure 1 John 3:3 pure Purity is the meaning of the word and so when it is translated 'chaste' it is speaking of purity. Tit 2:5 chaste 1Pe 3:2 chaste 4 v.4 'Riot' 810 may convey to us a rather wild behaviour [Titus 1:6 1 Peter 4:4] which we might think would not be found in brethren and sisters. A 'riot' in current use relates to a wile, unruly mob behaving wildly. However we can see:- [Ephesians 5:18] That 'riot' in the above examples actually is 'excess', which is something we can understand as something which might be seen in brethren and sisters. Of course excess is most inappropriate for those who are appointed to 'rule'. 5 v.2 - Being materialistic must have been a problem in the first century because on a number of times:- [1 Timothy 3:3,8 Titus 1:7,11 1 Peter 5:2] There is the warning that those who take ecclesial office should not be greedy of 'filthy lucre'. We know that a gift perverts justice. [Exodus 23:8 Proverbs 17:23] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch.3
In this quotation from Psalm 34 Peter reminded his audience of the words that David used to teach the 400 in the cave (1 Samuel 22) how they should trust God. ch.4
If we were
able to implement this teaching there would be far less strife amongst us. Rather
than always seeking to highlight errors in other we would be willing to accept
the repentance of others and simply not mention misdemeanors unless it was really
necessary. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:6 Sarah called Abraham 'lord' in her heart (Genesis 18:12) - it was an attitude of mind, not just words to please Abraham. He was unaware that she had thought the words. In the same way our respect and honour tot he Father must be from the heart, not just outward show. 4:9 'Without grudging' is an all pervading aspect of the gospel message. The generous spirit reflects that of our God. Think for yourselves of examples of Scripture teaching us that we should have this generous spirit. Maybe you can e-mail me with your list? 5:1 In what way was peter a 'partaker of the glory that shall be revealed'? He was still 'in the flesh' and he still sinned. The way in which he was a partaker of the glory is that he had fellowship with his God through the sacrifice of Christ. We are in the same position. We are now partakers of that glory. Once we realise this we will want to walk worthy of that position. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
1Pet 5:3. They were not to think of their charges as being subject to them. These words contrast sharply with Ezekiel’s denunciation of false shepherds.(Ezek.34) They are to take oversight thereof not by constraint, but with godly willingness, not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind. In the ecclesia of Christ there is no room for absolute power over the flock, instead they are to be examples to the flock. We are reminded of the words spoken by the Good Shepherd in John 10. 1Pet 5:5. Peter, after providing direction to the elders, now turns to the younger members of the ecclesia with words of exhortation. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||
3:8 Being of 'one mind' is the most difficult thing to do. If Peter is talking about the relationship between husband and wife he must also be talking of the way we should be in the ecclesia. It is not good enough to be harmonious at home and fractious in the ecclesia. 4:6 The 'dead' are those who are 'dead in trespasses and sins' (Eph 2:1) 5:12 Silvanus had been involved with Paul in letter writing to Thessalonica (1Thess 1:1, 2Thess 1:1) Maybe he was originally from Thessalonica. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:1 It may seem unusual that Peter continues after talking about Christ being our example to say ‘likewise wives …’. However it is most appropriate. All believers are, in a sense, wives as they are betrothed to Jesus. Consequently the example of Jesus given in the previous chapter is the yardstick for those who would be part of the bride of Christ. Peter is not speaking just to wives. He is speaking to all of us. 4:1 There is a relationship between suffering – that is being tempted – and Godliness. It was in the very temptations that Jesus experienced in the wilderness that he learnt firstly about himself and secondly about how God cares for His children. It is only through knowing ourselves that we can resist temptation – have the mind of Christ. 5:3 Peter stresses that those whoa re going to be ‘elders’ in the ecclesia must teach by example and not merely tell others what to do. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:2 The marriage relationship is the closest relationship we have with anyone. All attempts at living a life of deceit are at variance with that relationship. One’s partner sees us ‘warts and all’ so to say that the unbeliever might be won by the ‘chaste conversation’ of the wife highlights the importance of a life of total commitment to God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:9 Not rendering evil for evil and railing for railing draws on Prov 17:13 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
CLEAR MIND FOR THE LAST DAYS I remember feeling an urgency that I needed to be ready for the return of Jesus about twenty five years ago. At that time I thought things seemed so close and so ready for the time of the end to begin, that it could have been any day. I felt I needed to do all that I could do to prepare. Twenty five years on, things have changed. Now we are twenty five years closer to the return of Christ than we were when I first believed. If anything, there should be more urgency now than there was before. Jesus is twenty five years closer to coming. More prophecies have been fulfilled, events have lined up closer to what it will be like at the time of the end. Each day we live is another day closer to the return of Christ. If this is the case, then the words of Peter should have extra significance for us today. "The end of all things is near. Therefore be clear minded and self-controlled so that you can pray." (1Pet 4:7) This is advice for us living in the last days. We are not to let our minds get cluttered up with the stress of everyday living, with the entertainment of the world, or with the mind-bending influences of alchohol or drugs. We are to be clear-minded and self-controlled. The reason for our clear-mindedness and self-control is so that we can pray. Let's make the effort to clear our minds of the swirl of living life, and focus on controling our minds enough to make prayer a major priority in our lives. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
4:6The ‘dead’ are not literally ‘dead’ but not alive to God. They have not yet heard the gospel message. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
In 1Pet 3:7 it tells husbands to give honour to their wives “as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.” The word hinder means “to be cut off”. This is therefore a very powerful verse. Peter tells us that our spiritual life could be totally upset, or cut off, if we do not pray with and honour our husband or wife.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to David |
||||||||||
3:1 The western world is opposed to women being subservient men. Equal Rights is obligatory in today’s godless, humanistic society. However, if one intends to follow the Lord, one has to be prepared to follow by His rules. Wives' subjection to their husbands is in respect to the hierarchy that Yahweh put in place in Eden: God ---> Christ ---> Man ---> Woman. But, wives being subject to (ESV) their husbands does not mean slavery or abuse. Husbands have a responsibility to be caring and compassionate towards their wives (v.7; Eph 5:25; Col 3:19). All members of Christ's household all are spiritually free and equal (5:1; Gal 3:28). 3:20 Jesus comments on the days of Noah (Luke 17:26,27). When Jesus returns to earth, the world will be carrying on with the cares of the flesh. It will have no regard for the things of God. Then, as in the days of Noah, there will be sudden destruction. Only a relatively few people will be saved, like in Noah’s day when only eight people survived the flood. 4:2 Contrary to today’s permissive, self-indulgent society, the disciple of Jesus should obey Yahweh (Acts 5:29). 4:12 Fiery trial is a reference to metals being refined and the dross (impurities) removed. And so, the disciple of Jesus should expect to be tested. Trials are needed to build faith and character, and to rid oneself of the flesh (1Cor 10:13; 1Pet 1:7). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
GIFTS FAITHFULLY USED "Each one should use whatever gift he has received to serve others, faithfully administering God's gift in its various forms." (1Pet 4:10) We have all received talents from God that show in our personalities and individual strengths. Most of us make use of these talents in the occupation we choose, in the hobbies or sports we take up. But God has not given us these gifts so that we can make lots of money or enjoy a pleasurable life. Enjoying our gifts in this way is good - especially when we give thanks for them, but the reason they have been given to us is so that we can serve others. Our gifts have not been given to us for our pleasure but because the people around us need our service in those areas. It is only by serving others in the way God has planned for us that we will be seen by God to be "faithfully administering God's gift." Any use less than serving others with the gifts we have been given when we have opportunity to do so, is to use these gifts unfaithfully. It is to disregard the plans God has for us and to turn away from the good works he has planned for us to do. So let us look for every opportunity to faithfully administer the gifts God has given us as we serve one another in the ways God has especially given us to serve. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
PRAYER AND MARRIAGE One of the roles God has given those of us who are men is to pray. It is true that women also should pray - everyone should pray - but men have that special responsibility. (1Tim 2:8) If this is the case then we men need to make sure that, not only do we pray, but that our prayers are powerful and effective. When Peter addresses husbands, he warns us to watch out that our prayers are effective. He says, "Husbands, in the same way be be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker partner, and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers." (1Pet 3:7) If we are bulldogs toward our wives and do not give them the respect and consideration they should have as our wives, the same love that Christ shows toward the church, then God will not be interested in listening to our prayers. God said the same thing through Malachi. The people were asking why God was not accepting their sacrifices and offerings. The answer was, "It is because the LORD is acting as the witness between you and the wife of your youth, because you have broken faith with her, though she is your partner, the wife of your marriage partner." (Mal 2:13-14) So let us love our wives as Christ loves the church and continue to pray as we have been called to do. In doing so our prayers will be powerful and effective. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
3:15 ‘Sanctify ... hearts’ quotes Lev 11:44 so we see that the Law of Moses is not just a set of laws for the Jews but lays out principles for Christian living today. If God is sanctified in our hearts then our separate lives will please Hm. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||