|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.25
- The events of this chapter are reported showing neither God's approval nor his
disapproval until you reach this last verse, where his disapproval is clearly
stated. Let us be careful that we ensure that we do not have a similar phrase
tagged on to the end of our actions.
Ps.12:4,
Prov.3:5, 14:12, Mic.2:1,2. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.1
This oath goes beyond what the law of Moses required. It was folly in Israel as
it would cause one tribe to vanish. So because they have made a foolish vow they
have to resort to more folly. Would it not have been better to forgo the foolish
vow? Of course having vowed they had to pay. [Ecclesiastes
5:4] Thus the making
of rash promises is a folly we should avoid. We see the folly of rash promises
and take not for ourselves. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.20-23
This story shows us, if nothing else, that God's provision might come from the
most surprising of sources. Let us therefore be ready to look everywhere for the
answers to our prayers, and not have a preconceived idea of what God might do. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 21:25
This closing refrain which we have seen is characteristic of this period in the
time of the Judges, though at the end of the book relates to early events in the
time of the Judges. The scene is set of the book of Ruth which presents a very
different picture of people in Israel and the coming of the gentile bride. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :19
The tabernacle was, at this time, at Shiloh (Joshua
18:1) We may conclude that the 'feast' was Passover.;
Exodus 13:6 speaks of Passover as a 'feast to the Lord' - again a rare phrase
in Scripture. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 21:621:6 Is this a matter of swearing and changing not Psa 15:4 or is it stubborn foolishness? Do we ever say things or make decisions in the ecclesia which we then realise are foolish but out of pride refuse to change our minds? Is it more important to save face or do what is right? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.23 The Benjamites followed the direction of the elders, and took of the daughters of Shilom. They then returned to their cities and inheritance; hence the tribe was not erased out of Israel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Vs.8-10 The people of Jabesh-Gilead, in the allotment of Gad, did not answer the call of their brethren. For that, they were annihilated, with the exception of 400 marriageable virgins. These went to supply wives to the Benjaminites. But there was a shortfall of 200 wives. These were supplied by the kidnapping of the virgin dancers of Shiloh who were celebrating the Passover. Contrast the procurement of wives from Jabesh-Gilead with those from Shiloh. In the first incidence, the wives were spared from destruction and became the legitimate spoils of war. In the second incidence, the dancers were snatched from their families during a happy occasion and taken away. V.22 The kidnappers expected complaints to be forthcoming. How would the families be appeased? They would probably be satisfied with the realization that their daughters would be recipients of a fine inheritance. The territory of Benjamin, which was formerly occupied by over 40,000, would now be occupied by only 1200. What an inheritance! Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| There's always ways and means. Wise as serpents but harmless as doves, as Jesus told His disciples (Matt 10:16). The strategy in Judges 21 whereby the Benjaminites gained wives had to be legal, according to their vow (Judg 21:18). We, too, can be clever, but must be legal, according to God's laws. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
| The men of Israel lifted up their voices and wept, saying "why has this come to pass in Israel that today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?". The answer, of course, is that instead of standing apart from the evil that their countrymen had committed, they had stood for it (20:13). It wasn't as if all the men of Benjamin had taken part in the sin, yet by their willingness to fight for those men, instead of offering them up to be slain, the whole tribe had become guilty. So also with us, we ought not to stick up for our friends when we know they are doing something wrong. Our attitude should be to speak out to them early, lest we become embroiled in it ourselves. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
21:22 So the fathers of the girls had to be ‘favourable’ because the rest of the tribes behaved foolishly in making the rash vow. How often do our brethren and sisters have to suffer the consequences of our foolish words or actions? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.6 The nation would not allow one of its members to disappear. Benjamin had been punished, but its demise would be unthinkable. And so, too, with us: we cannot permanently shut out any member or ecclesia from the spiritual family of Israel. We might sanction, but we must always leave the door open for recovery. Moreover, we should be proactive in restoration efforts. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Judg 21:25 "..Israel had no king..." ties in with the 2nd reading today Isa 43:15 "I am the LORD....your king" The problem was in the attitude of their hearts - they thought & acted as though they had no king, & particularly, the LORD was not King of their hearts & minds. So we should ask "who is our king, to whom we look for example & leadership?" The answer is in the 3rd reading 2John 5,6,9 Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||
21:7 They are concerned as to where Benjamin can find wives but at the same time they were happy to marry the Canaanites – Judg 3:7. Remember the events of these latter chapters record events which took place at the beginning of the time of the Judges Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
21:5 Even though the nation ‘repented’ it does not follow that their subsequent actions were acceptable. Having make a ‘rule’ which they felt unable to break, even though they now knew it was a silly rule, they devise another silly ‘rule’ to resolve their problem. Are we ever like that? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.25 The tenor of the times, where there was no (moral) leadership, is again described. However, Israel always had a king who has given moral leadership. That King is Yahweh. In our Isaiah reading, for today, He reiterates that fact (Isa 43:15). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
21:8 That Jabesh-Gilead did not come possibly indicates a more spiritually minded group of men. They did not want to meddle in a matter that was not their concern. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Mizpah (Mizpeh KJV) means watchtower. There are several towns in the Bible called of this name. The Mizpah mentioned here was a town in the territory of Benjamin. It became a center for the gathering of Israel when there was a national emergency (another example. 1Sam 7:5,16). V.8 Jabesh-gilead was a town in the Gilead region of the tribe of (East) Manasseh. Jabesh means dry. Later, this town became memorable when Saul delivered Jabesh-gilead from the Ammonite king Nahash (1Sam 11:11). In return, the men of Jabesh-gilead took care of the bodies of Saul and his sons (1Sam 31:11-13). V.19 Shiloh means place of rest or the peaceful one. Shiloh is a city in the territory of Ephraim. An early Messianic reference to Shiloh is found in Gen 49:10. Contrast this with Isa 9:6. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
21:12 Isn’t is strange that the land what Israel had go in to possess is called ‘Canaan’ and not the land of Israel. Possibly an indication of the attitude that God had towards His people who did not take the and to themselves despite being promised it. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.
1 - To be called by name by God is the greatest aspiration we can have. Let
us be sure that it is top of our list, that we might be one of his people, and
be known by him.
Heb.8:8-10,
Tit.2:14, 1Cor.8:3, 13:12. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.
2 when
thou walkest through the fire, thou shalt not be burned; neither shall the flame
kindle upon thee. Must have been a great comfort to Daniels friends
[3:12] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.8-10
- Those who can see the truth of the gospel are like blind who have had their
eyes opened or deaf who have had their ears opened. The power of the truth transcends
all that we know or have ever known. God's power is such that those to whom he
gives the increase (1Cor.3:6,7)
find themselves able to see and hear spiritual truth that others cannot comprehend
at all. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 43:21
That God has people who will show forth His praise explains why Peter (1
Peter 2:9) quotes these words as our obligation now. If we cannot show forth
His praise now we will not be in the kingdom. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :14
So Israel were to benefit from being sent to Babylon - Hezekiah was right
(Isaiah
39:8). That God does things for the benefit of His creation is seen often
- Genesis
3:17, Micah 3:12 Exodus 20:20 Deuteronomy 8:2 etc:) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 43:5-6-6 The promises that 'thy seed' would be brought from all four points of the compass is the basis for Jesus' words (Luke 13:29) where he speaks of men coming from the four points of the compass to sit in the kingdom of God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.8-10 In all generations it has been the blindness and deafness of Israel that has been their unwitting witness to the truth of God. A nation who are His chosen, and yet not fit (as yet) to go into His House. So it is to this day! Blind Israel has no House of the Lord to go into. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| THE WITNESS OF ISRAEL Their existence is nothing short of remarkable. Almost 2000 years ago the Jews were forced from their own land, killed or sold as slaves, and scattered throughout the world. In every place they have lived since then, the have never become part of the nations they were in. They always remained separate - an unique people. The Jews, wherever they have lived have always been persecuted, and even after 2000 years, they still have they own identity. Many other nations have been destroyed and the people scattered, and over the course of time, forgotten - but not the Jew. Now in our own times we have witnessed a miracle. Against all odds the Jewish nation exists again. More than that, they are back in the ancient land of Israel - the land God promised to them as an everlasting inheritance. Their position in the land of Israel is another miracle in that they have overcome incredible odds as their enemies have tried to drive them out and reduce them to nothing. The Jew has stood at the grave of all his enemies. Israel is certainly a despised, but very remarkable nation. There is a reason for this. They are God's special people. They are his witnesses. Therefore when we look at Israel, we should see God in action. God said of Israel, "You are my witnesses' declares the LORD, 'and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he ... You are my witnesses,' declares the LORD, 'that I am God.'" (Isa 43:10,12) Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| God’s purpose in choosing Israel is outlined well in Isa 43:7: created for God’s glory. Formed and made by God. The whole Scriptures revolve around Israel, and God’s promises to the nation. And we, in New Testament times, are spiritual Israel. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
43:24-25 When the Jewish leaders told Jesus that only God could forgive sins – Mark 2:7 – they might have had this verse in mind. However Jesus, by forgiving sins, showed that he was the one spoken of in this verse. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.5-6 What comfort and hope this gave the faithful among them; those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. The first exodus would lead to the second exodus. This great exodus has begun, but it can only be appreciated by those who read and study God's word. There are those who read, and are blind, refusing to recognise that the nation of Israel is still God's witness and servent. The witness of Israel shows that this is a grave misunderstanding "He that scattered Israel will gather him and keep hom as a shepherd doth his flock" Jer 31:10. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
43:5-6 The specific mention of the four points of the compass is used by Jesus – Luke 13:29in exactly the same order as we see them here. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 43:1 God had redeemed them from Egypt and entered into covenant relationship with them at Sinai. They belonged to Him.(V.1) He would remain faithful (V.2), even though they had proved faithless (V. 22-24). He had punished other nations for their sake (V.3), and would very shortly remove Babylon (V.14-17). John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
43:4The words ‘I have loved you’ are quoted by the prophet Mal 1:2 where the prophet is clearly quoting Isaiah’s words. Remember that Malachi prophesied after the children of Israel had returned from Babylon and so they should have been aware of the words of the prophet Isaiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.24,25 Israel had sinned and displeased Yahweh. And yet, He was prepared to forgive Israel's sins . The same applies to us. Yahweh is merciful, but, note the phrase for mine own sake (KJV). Yahweh does things for a purpose - His purpose. All things (including people) which are in Yahweh's self-interest will live - all others will die. Yahweh answers to no-one. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
43:10 The continued existence of Israel is the evidence that the people of the world can see to show that God exists. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
In this chapter, Yahweh talks about: -Saving Israel -Bringing Israel back to the Land -Charging Israel to be His witnesses -The Babylonian invasion - Israel’s extrication from Egypt - Praise of Himself. V.7 All those who belong to Israel bear Yahweh’s Name (Isa 44:5). Those so named have been created for the glory of Yahweh (v.21). Those of Spiritual Israel (the true disciples of Jesus) have the same conditions of name and praise attached to them. Those accepted into the kingdom will have Yahweh’s Name on their foreheads (Phil 2:11; Rev 14:1). V.27 This verse reminds us that we are all sinners (1Cor 15:22). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
43:2 The promise that deliverance from ‘water’ and ‘fire’ can be seen fulfilled in Jesus’ healing work – Matt 17:15 when Jesus healed the boy who was cast into the fire and water by his illness. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 2John
v.5 - Although the covenant is new under Jesus, and the new covenant is based
on love - salvation by grace through faith, rather than by law - nevertheless
the commandment to love one another has always been a fundamental principle of
Godly living. Matt.22:39
etc., referring back to the law. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2 John v.7 In John's first letter he speaks of the 'antichrist' [1 John 2:18,22 4:3] as he does here. Whilst we may develop great ideas about the antichrist and notice that evangelical churches do likewise John is quite clear. In his day the 'antichrist' was at work and there was more than one of them. It was anyone who gainsaid the teaching of Scripture with respect to the Lord Jesus Christ. 3 John v.1 Gaius, from Macedonia [Acts 20:4] was baptised by Paul [1 Corinthians 1:14] and then seems to have accompanied Paul for a while [Acts 19:29 20:4] and then hosted Paul whilst he was at Rome [Romans 16:23]. From the commendation John gives he must have been an avid worker. Oh that we could receive the commendation that [v5] we do faithfully all that we do. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2John v9 The 'full reward' is like the 'full reward (Ruth 2:12) that Boaz wished on Ruth for her faithfulness. Ruth is the gentile bride - like us - who is to receive the full blessing of God as long as we 'look to ourselves' 3John v10 'prating about us with malicious words' seems to quote Matthew 5:11 - but Jesus is speaking of opponents of the truth - so Diotrophes must have been a really problematical individual. He was a brother who was full of self importance (:9) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| NO GREATER
JOY Jonathan (my son) asked me this morning what I liked best about him. I had told him I liked his caring attitude toward others, but I had to think a moment before I answered what I liked best about him. My answer was that the thing I liked best was his love for God. Now, in reading 3 John, I find that John had the same joy about his children (in this case he calls those he has brought to Christ, his children). He says, "I have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the truth." This is also true of God, Jesus and the angels. We read that there is more joy in heaven over one sinner that repents than over the 99 who need no repentance. The joy of someone accepting Jesus as their saviour and living a godly life is as good as it gets in this life - and it is an especially great joy if you have had some personal input that has encouraged that change or decision in a life. The greatest joy is still to come and that will be when we are accepted along with all the other faithful people into the kingdom. Until then let us work toward fulfilling that great joy of seeing our children walking in the truth. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
2John:10 Harsh words indeed. However they show the danger of association with those in error. But John is not counseling us to separate from brethren over trivial issues. 3John:3 Do we think that we should rejoice when we hear of others being faithful to the gospel? We do rejoice at the time of a baptism - but does that rejoicing continue when we see faithful walk? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2John 1. “TRUTH” is set forth and emphasized. We would suggest this to expose the false teachers(v.7-9) The exhortation in v.9 is not only to hold fast to sound doctrine, but also to avoid that which is not. 3John 10. We see that there were five offences against Diotrephes. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||
2John 1:2 'dwelleth' <3305> continues the theme we noticed in John 14 and 15 and also in 1John . 3John 1:3 Walking in the truth' shows that we have to be active, not passive, in our spiritual development. Eph 5:2 shows that we should 'walk in love' demonstrating that our walk has to be in association with others. We cannot walk alone towards the kingdom. We have to interact with others. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2John 1:5 The commandment is simple 'love one another' which echoes what Jesus said (John 13:34, 15:12,17) but putting it into practice is another matter! The disharmony evidenced in the New Testament shows how difficult it is. Maybe we can think of examples in our own lives which show how difficult we find this commandment. 3John 1:5-6 It seems that Gaius was 'not forgetful to entertain strangers' (Heb 13:2) and that his hospitality was well known in the community. His hospitality had been towards brethren who were traveling in the service of the Gospel. Gaius' generosity had meant that these traveling brethren could do their work without charge to the ecclesias they visited. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2:7 The spirit of the antichrist was alive in the first century. When the Lord returns to cleanse the earth, he will be opposed by religious authorities. Ironically, in their rejection, they will call Him the antichrist. 3:9,10 Dissention was also alive in the first century ecclesia. There were strong-willed, self-important characters such as Diotrephes who wreaked havoc. John was determined to confront Diotrephes. We, too, should not be shy to confront those who would disrupt the peace of Christ's body in their preaching false doctrine or showing bad behavior. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| WORK TOGETHER As far as we can tell, Gaius was not the sort of person who was particularly disposed to teaching people of Jesus or preaching the word. He was not a traveller out doing mission work in remote places. There are many of us, like Gaius, who do not fall into the "get out there and preach the word" mould, although when opportunities come up, we must take them. Gaius had other talents. John lists many of Gaius' talents in his letter. Gaius was faithful to the truth; he walked in truth; he served his brothers even though he had never met them before; he was loving; and Gaius was hospitable. John didn't reprove Gaius for his lack of preaching work. Other people were doing the preaching, and with Gaius' hospitality, love and service, those who were travelling to remote places and in the front line of service to their Lord, were refreshed. Our work in Christ is a team effort. We cannot do everything ourselves. Gaius' ministry was just as important to the work of the Lord as those who actively preached. Without people like Gaius, people like Paul, Barnabus, Silas and Timothy would have burned out. Let's use our talents to serve each other in the Lord "so that we may work together for the truth." (3 John v.8) Let's become a team because as a team we can have much more effect. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 3John:4 John speaks of "children" not in the physical desent but spiritual birth..Similarly, Paul writes to the believers in Corinth "In Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel" 1Cor 4:15. The term children includes John's friend Gaius and all other believers who have come to know the truth through the preaching and teaching of the apostle. We all have had those who we look up to as mothers and fathers in the truth, may we all mature to the degree that we can likewise serve in the the same manner. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
1:3 Notice it is ‘truth and love’ it is all too easy to insist on truth in such a harsh and judgmental manner that we forget all about love. God blends both these characteristics perfectly. Exo 34:6 and that is the ideal that we should endeavor to emulate. 1:7 So Gaius did the things he did because of his love of the Father. Doubtless he enjoyed showing hospitality. However he did not show hospitality for his own benefit, or even for the benefit of those who he helped. He was motivated by a love of the Father and His son. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| BRINGING UP CHILDREN How much priority do we give to bringing up our children to walk in the truth? John,as he wrote to the Chosen Lady and her children, said this: "It has given me great joy to find some of your children walking in the truth, just as the Father commanded us." (2John 4) The Chosen Lady was obviously someone who made the bringing up of her children to walk in the truth a top priority. One of the times the Father gave the command to bring up our children in his ways was in Deuteronomy 6. "These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads. Write them on the doorposts of your houses and on your gates." (Deut 6:6-8) In other words, the way to bring up children in the truth is to make the truth a natural, vital and regular part of life every day. It will be one of the greatest joys we can experience when we are together with our children, whom we have brought up, and are accepted into God's kingdom. So let's follow her example by making the bringing up of our children in God's ways, a priority in life. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
2John 1:1 In speaking of himself as ‘the elder’ the writer introduces himself by his status, not his name. The only other letter which is not introduced by the name of the author is Hebrews. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
3:9,10 It is just as important to oppose un-Christ like leaders today as it was in the first century. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
1:3 A little point but John is typical in the way he sends greetings from God and Jesus – no greetings from the Holy Spirit – quite a powerful point against the doctrine of the trinity. If God is three in one then why do not all three elements send greetings? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2John 1:12 Clearly the ‘children’ are not the literal children of the one to whom John writes. Her status is like that of a ‘mother in Israel’ who cares for the younger in the flock. This is the responsibility of all faithful believers. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
a) There are a lot of modern comments about an “antichrist”, often made by those who know little of the Bible. But there is a simple explanation in 2John 7. An “antichrist” is someone who denies Jesus came in the flesh. b) 3John 5-8 says some lovely things about Gaius. He obviously really loved the work of Christ, and helped and supported both the brethren and strangers. John says that if he continues in such things “thou shalt do well”. This can be brought forward to our day, for the ecclesia need US. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to David |
||||||||||
2:9 The doctrine of Christ (KJV) sounds like there is just one principle of Christ. This phrase is better translated the teaching of Christ (ESV), because the whole spectrum of His instruction is meant. That means His personal teaching plus the teaching of the apostles. The apostles were guided by the Holy Spirit just like the writers of the Old Testament (2Tim 3:16; 2Pet 1:21). And, because Jesus references Himself in the Books of Moses and the Prophets, the Old Testament should also be read (Luke 24:27). 2:1; 3:1 John was called an elder. That designation was both spiritual and physical, for John was a very old man (probably 90 years old) when he wrote these letters in about 90 AD. Not long afterwards, he was exiled to the Isle of Patmos where he penned Revelation. It is probable that John was the only apostle to die a natural death, while the others were killed violently. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
3John 1:2 We know that the love of money is the root of all evil. However there is nothing wrong with having wealth. It is the way it is used. So John, knowing what Gaius was like, was concerned that he would have god health and a degree of prosperity so that freed from those worries he could give himself to the service of God. What about ourselves? If we have good health and sufficient for all our needs do we strive for more or thank God and give ourselves over to His service? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||