|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| 1
v.15 - Here is the crunch of this argument - back to her gods. This example
of decision making for us to consider here is represented on a very emotional
level. In this example you can see the way that the love these women had for each
other was causing the grief that hampered the decisions. How well we can relate
to situations like this. When they happen, which way do we choose? Ps.125:5,
Matt.13:20-21, Josh.24:15-20. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
1
v.4
The mention of ten years is the only time reference in the whole of the book
of Ruth. The
family So how was David allowed to be king as he was only the fourth generation? 2 v.2 Whilst the A V has 'ears of corn' the Hebrews actually just has 'ears' so what they were gathering is not specified though we know that it was barley as it was the time of the barley harvest. [Ruth 2:17] That Ruth was gleaning despite the fact that Naomi came from an important family in Bethlehem demonstrates why Naomi said that she was to be called bitter - she was destitute, and a widow at that. However we know that Yahweh cares for the '... widow' [Deuteronomy 10:18 Psalm 68:5 146:9 Proverbs 15:25] 2 v.9 Boaz was a faithful man who, we presume, would endeavour to employ faithful men. However he feels the need to give his young men charge that the do not harm Ruth. An indication of the Godlessness in Israel at this time during the Judges. 2 v.14 That they ate 'parched corn' is interesting. It is a phrase which is never used after the time of David. [Leviticus 23:14 Joshua 5:11 Ruth 2:14 1 Samuel 17:17 25:18 2 Samuel 17:28] Implying that the author of the book of Ruth was aware of the specific customs of the time. Just a little point which helps in building up an armoury or data which shows the authenticity of the Bible. We should be looking at the fine details of the accounts in Scripture and thinking about the language. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2
v.2 suggests that it was Ruth's intention all along to find her husband this
way. Quite an ambition for a Moabitess in Israel, where the people of Moab had
a far from happy history. But the success she had, was, like all of our success,
now hers, but to the glory of God, as He had it in His plan to make Ruth one of
those through whom the great Messiah would come. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
ch 1 - The book of Ruth typifies the call of the gentiles - the taking of a gentile bride by a faithful man of Judah. So we should not be surprised to see the links
ch 2 - Another link with Isaiah 40
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| ch
1 - THE AMAZING CHARACTER OF NAOMI How do you get on with your in-laws? There never seems to be a shortage of mother-in-law jokes and stories - but here is a mother-in-law to be proud of. Naomi. Naomi, Elimilech and their two sons went to live in Moab. Elimelech died, her sons got married and then her sons died. What better excuse to get rid of your mother-in-law than to have your husband die and not to be left with the ties any more. But Naomi's two daughter-in-law's, Ruth and Orpah had no intention of leaving Naomi. They loved her. That tells us that Naomi was an absolutely amazing person. Ruth in particular loved her more than her own parents and country. She loved her so much that she gave up everything she ever had or could have for her love of Naomi. She said, "Where you go I will go, and where you stay I will stay. Your people will be my people, and your God my God may the LORD deal with me, be it ever so severely, if anything but death separates you and me." Wouldn't you love to be like Naomi? There are plenty of places in the Bible that tell us how to love each other. Read them. Learn them. Live them. Then you will be loved like Naomi. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
| ch.1 - Remember
the events of the book of Ruth fit into the time of the Judges (1:1)
When we were looking at the latter chapters in Judges we commented on the use
of Bethlehem Judah and Gibeah. The point was made that Judge shows the unsuitability
of the tribe of Benjamin - Saul's tribe - for kingship. Ruth focuses on Bethlehem
of Judah - the home of David - to show Judah's suitability for kingship.
Bethlehem 2:12 The 'full reward' is what we are hoping for (2 John 8), John is quoting the words of Boaz to Ruth. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| ch
2 - GREETINGS "Just them Boaz arrived from Bethlehem and greeted the harvesters, 'The Lord be with you!' 'The LORD bless you!' they called back." What a positive start to the day! I heard a saying the other day, "Sometimes I wake up grumpy in the morning - and other times I let her sleep"! However, if we had a positive start like Boaz there would be much less grumpiness. What are our morning greetings like? They can range from a grunted "Uhh," through to the blessing that Boaz gave. One of the most common morning greetings is "Good Morning" We often say "Good Morning" to nearly everyone we meet. Why is it a good morning? It is good because we have a new day to serve God, a new opportunity to accept his salvation and we are surrounded by his love. So when we say, Good Morning," to someone today, be sure to give them the "Good" and let them know what God has done and prepared for them. Let us in our greetings prepare for the greeting of Jesus in the kingdom. "Well done good and faithful servant, enter into the joy of your Lord." Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
|
1:1 Whilst there was a famine in 2:2 Notice the repeated use of the word ‘field’ 2:2,3,8,9,17,22 Ruth’s husband, having died in Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 1:11 This alludes to the Law, which required a younger son to marry the widow of his deceased brother.Deut 25:5 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
The sojourn of Naomi and her family to Moab probably took place during the time of Gideon. At this time, the Midianites destroyed the crops of the Israelites (Judg 6:1-4). During their stay in Moab, Mahlon and Chilion took wives Orpah and Ruth. Taking non-Israelite wives was unacceptable to Yahweh (1Kin 11:1,2). Perhaps this is the reason Mahlon and Chilion met untimely deaths. During their sojourn together, Naomi would have had much opportunity to tell her daughters-in-law about Yahweh and the historical experiences of Moab and Israel. And so, at the point of returning to Israel, Orpah and Ruth had a decision to make - to go or to stay. They both, obviously, loved their mother-in-law but it was only Ruth who wished to serve Yahweh, the true living God. She, unlike Orpah, was willing to convert and went with Naomi. The truth had been preached and only one had accepted it. Subsequently, Ruth would marry Boaz (strength) and would be integral in the line of the Lord Jesus. Boaz was descended from Rahab the harlot. He married a woman from a nation who could never be part of Israel (Deut 23:3; Neh 13:1,2). Such is the mercy of Yahweh who will always find a place for those willing to turn to Him, regardless of their background (Psa 51:17; Isa 66:2). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| Elimelech is not condemned by God in the book of Ruth, although he does die, and is buried with his two sons, in a foreign land. May I suggest that God was very displeased with him. They hadn't been in the Promised Land for long, yet Elimelech thought he had to run away when famine came. His elder brother, or cousin, Boaz, was however "a mighty man of wealth" just over 10 years later, as he didn't runaway. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
2:2 The right of gleaning was conferred by a positive law on the widow, the poor, and the stranger (Lev.19:9) and ( Deut.24:19). But liberty to glean behind the reapers ( 2:3) was not a right that could be claimed; it was a privilege granted or refused according to the good will or favor of the owner. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
| COMFORT As Naomi walked back into Bethlehem after her long absence, she said this, "The Almighty has made my life very bitter. I went away full, but the LORD has brought me back again empty. Why call me Naomi? The LORD has afflicted me; the Almighty has brought misfortune upon me." (Ruth 1:20-21) Certainly Naomi's last ten years had been hard ones. She had left her home and the people she knew; she had lost her husband and her two sons. This also meant that she had lost her income and the comforts that the family had. The thing that must have comforted Naomi the most was the presence of Ruth. He daughter-in-laws loved her very much, and especially so, Ruth. Ruth stayed with Naomi through all her troubles. Together they were able to support each other and with Ruth's promise of commitment, Naomi would be confident that she would not get up and leave her destitute at a whim. Probably one of the greatest comforts we could have if we were ever faced with the same suffering and grief of Naomi, would be to have a friend like Ruth - someone to rely on, a shoulder to cry on and a support we can trust. Let's be that sort of friend to those who need it. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
2:2 Notice the repeated use of the word ‘field’ 2:2,3,8,9,17,22 Ruth’s husband, having died in
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
1:1,2,4,5,6,14,16,20,22 -- v1 an Israeli family from "Bethlehem" (1035) means "house of bread" in "Judah" (3063) meaning "celebrated" experiences a famine in this place suggesting God's displeasure; the family travels to Moab (symbolically moving away from believers/ecclesia?); v2 the man's wife is named "Naomi" (5281) meaning "pleasant", the sons are named "Mahlon" (4248) meaning "sick" and "Chilion" (3630) meaning "pining, failing, destruction, consumption" and the family were "Ephrathites" (673) the root means "fruitfulness"; v4 the sons marry Moabite women "Orpah" (6204) meaning "mane, back of the neck, the back, stiff necked" and "Ruth" (7327) meaning "friend"; v5 all three men die perhaps suggesting spiritually sick Israel; v6 Naomi perhaps represents the fruitful (fruitfulness) remnant of Israel that obeys God even in hard times and the three head back to Israel; v14 Orpah, a Gentile, turns her back on serving God but Ruth clings to a spiritual woman; v16 Ruth perhaps represents Gentiles who seek God; v20 their prospects seem "bitter" as the name "Mara" suggests (Heb 12:11); v22 they arrive back home approximately the time of the Passover. 2:1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11,12,14,16,18,20,22 -- v1-3 Ruth picks up leftover grain (Matt 15:26-28) in hopes of finding marriage working in the field of "Boaz" (according to The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible means "in him is strength"), Naomi's late husband's "kinsman" Heb. "yada" (3045) meaning "kinsman, familiar friend"; v4,8,9,22 Boaz is a Godly man, based on his greeting, and is protective of Ruth; v10-12 Boaz notes her character and it is likely he was the Gentile Rahab's son; v14-16 they share bread and wine and he helps and encourages her like Christ does for us and we are to do for each other; v18 Ruth is kind and shares with Naomi; v20 "kinsmen" Heb. "ga'al" (1350) meaning "to redeem, redeemer, ransom, to be next of kin, deliver, purchase", etc. and this coupled with Boaz showing "kindness" Heb. "chesed" (2617) means "kindness, mercy", etc. to the living and the dead both Jew and Gentile perhaps suggests Boaz is a type of Christ. Some of the above was gleaned from Judges and Ruth by H.A.Whittaker p205-235.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||||||||
1:20,21 Naomi calls Yahweh the Almighty. In Hebrew, the Almighty is El Shaddai which essentially means powerful and impregnable. However, there is a component of the Name which implies nourishment, comfort and protection. Shad in Hebrew means breast, which the instrument of nourishment but also the place where a dependent is held for comfort and protection. Thus, it is not surprising that Boaz uses this same kind of language about Yahweh to Ruth (2:12). 3:9 Incidentally, when Ruth requests the nourishment, comfort and protection of Boaz, she uses the same word: skirt = wings = kanaph in Hebrew (2:12). Malachi describes the healing properties of Jesus using the same word (wings/ kanaph) (Mal 4:2). Touching Jesus' hem (Gr. kraspedon) is the same as touching the extremity of his garment (kanaph) (Matt 9:20; 14:36). Boaz (whose name means strength) is a type of Christ. As Boaz offered Ruth nourishment, comfort and protection, so does Jesus to all who would come to Him. Through divine strength, Jesus is prepared to nourish us, comfort us, and shield us from death. The expression of El Shaddai is clearly seen in His own description of Himself (Matt 23:37). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
I am reminded of the parable of the Prodigal Son. He left the place of the Father's provision, thinking that things would be better somewhere else. So too did Elimelech & Naomi. Things got very bad for the prodigal son in the land of the gentiles, as it did for Naomi's family, and it is when they appreciate their emptiness that they return to the Father's house. The "son" Boaz who had remained, has a different attitude than the attitude of the Prodigal's brother, warmly sharing what the Father has given him. It is easy for us to think that life is better away from the Lord, and we can "move to Moab" in our hearts. If the Father chooses to give us a "famine", it is better to endure that in His care, than to seek something better elsewhere.
Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada] Comment added in 2006 reply to Wendy |
||||||||||||||||||
|
1:1 Whilst the details contained in the book of Ruth could easily have been slotted into the book of Judges by the Holy Spirit they are recorded separately. There must be a reason for this. I suggest that the book of Ruth is setting the scene for the line of David to be king. The later chapters of Jug – which talk abut the Benjamites – highlight how that Benjamin was unsuitable for kingship. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| LITTLE THINGS To Ruth they may have all seemed like little things - little decisions that were almost unnoticed in their significance. But together all those small decisions, her consistency, her hard work and care, all added up to show a character that was outstanding among women. Ruth may not have even known it, but her reputation preceded her. Boaz said, "I have been told all about what you have done for your mother-in-law since the death of your husband - how you left your father and mother and your homeland and have come to live with a people you did not know before. " (Ruth 2:11) Evidently there was far more behind this than what we actually read - especially in "all you have done for your mother-in-law." Even in the first few hours of gleaning in the fields, her character shone out. The foreman said of her: "She has worked steadily from morning till now." (v.7) While the decision to leave her family and homeland was a big decision, it was encompassed by many small, selfless decisions and tireless devotion that gave Ruth the reputation she received. Let us consistently make right decisions in the small areas of our lives too. Life does not consist of big things, but small decisions and tireless acts that culminate in an awesome character. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
1:21 In saying that the Lord had testified against her Naomi is acknowledging that she has sinned. See Deut 31:21 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
1:2 Mahlon means sickly, while Chilion means pining or wasting away. These are not very encouraging names, but ones which, probably, are descriptive of condition or disposition. As a matter of trivial interest, the T.V. personality Oprah Winfrey was intended to be named Orpah (meaning gazelle) after the Biblical character, but someone misspelled the name and it stuck. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
1:2 That Ruth came from Moab provided the reason why David would later send his parents to Moab – 11Sam 22:3– as his family on his ancenstral mother’s line (Ruth) came from there. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
1:22 The beginning of the barley harvest would have occurred at the end of March, in terms of our months. 2:9 Ruth was an unmarried and unprotected female amongst young men in the fields. This could have been a recipe for sexual assault had it not been for the protective command from the young men’s master. Charitable masters, like Boaz, would provide refreshment for their workers. Water was contained in bottles made from animal skins. Bread and vinegar were also given (2:14). 2:17 An ephah is equivalent to one-tenth of a homer, and one-hundredth of a bath (Eze 45:11). In our measure, an ephah is equivalent to the capacity of 22 liters (5.5 imperial gallons, or 5.8 US gallons). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
Althought Naomi wanted to change her name, to reflect her state of mind (ch1 v 20), we should note that God did not change her name - she continues to be called Naomi by the inspired writer. Perhaps Naomi felt that so much had gone wrong in her life that there could not be a place for her in God's plan and purpose. In her bitterness, Naomi had returned to God's people and her home, spiritually as well as literally Here Naoimi once more learnt the blessing that flow from God. Lindsay Yuile [Glasgow South Scotland (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Lindsay |
||||||||||||||||||
2:2 That Ruth asked if she could go and glean in Boaz’ filed implies that she had some knowledge of Israel’s law and the position of raising up seed to dead brothers. If so then she must have been taught this by Naomi. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
PLEDGE OF DEVOTION "Where you die I will die, " said Ruth. Jesus died to sin and in a similar way we should put to death anything sinful in us so that we can live with him. Our old way of life needs to be burried so that we can live with Christ.
Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.2
- Whatever our thoughts regarding predestination and free-will, we cannot get
away from the fact that God has an overwhelming knowledge of all times and places
as if they were one. Many are described as being formed or known from the womb,
as a person God will choose according to his purpose. God knows. It is man that
doesn't. v.21,24,
ch.43:1,7,21, 46:3,4, Psa.71:6. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.1-2
Continuing the claim
to be the only God Yahweh now appeals to the fact that He made Israel as the basis
for the assurance that they should fear
not. If one can believe that Yahweh has made one then one need not
worry about what is happening in ones life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| v.3
- The concept of God giving water to the thirsty is one of Isaiah's themes - 55:1.
We are expected to do the same - not just for our friends but also for our enemies
- Prov.25:21,
Luke 10:33-36, Rom.12:20,21 Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| 44:6
I am the first and I am the last is a claim of Yahweh which the risen Jesus says
is applicable to himself also since he has been raised from the dead (Revelation
1:8,17 22:1) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| :18
Israel had 'daubed' (Hebrew) their eyes and so were blind. Jesus, by contrast,
by daubing (see margin) mud on the eyes of the blind man (John
9:6) opened his eyes. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| I44:18 In saying that some had closed their eyes and were unable to see and understand Isaiah is developing word he has used earlier (6:10) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| V.3 "my blessing" The true blessing is explained by Peter as he addressed the people in Jerusalem. Acts 3:26 A means of having your sins forgiven. The beauty of of this is that this blessing is available to all today, who will do the will of our Heavenly Father.Gal 3:8;27-29 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
V.18 Because of their wanton idolatry, Yahweh had given his people over to spiritual blindness (See Isa 6:9,10). The word shut in Hebrew is tuach which means smear. In the case of the Laodicean ecclesia, the Lord urges the people to anoint their eyes with salve (the precious, curative commodity for which Laodicea was famous) in order to see their wayward position clearly (Rev 3:17,18). The word anoint comes from the Gr.egchrio which means smear. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| There’s an amazing revelation of God’s love and power in Isa 44:22. The Lord God begs Israel to return to Him. Sins can be forgiven, and godless ways overlooked. But what God wants is for Israel to come back to Him. And we know, that in the end they will. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
44:28 We should stop and think here when we read that God had spoken of ‘Cyrus’. At this time the Assyrians had not even been overtaken by the Babylonians! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.5 When we stop and consider what each statement, both implies and alludes to, we have an exhortation for all ages. We find the example of our Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ, and we discover the path by which we too can also attain unto the blessing of the spirit being poured out on us, and not only that, but become part of that great multitude that will bring glory to our Heavenly Father for ever. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
44:3,12 Notice that God will provide ‘water’ for the thirsty but the idol worshipper will thirst because he will not drink of God’s provision. That is he will not listen to God’s teaching . Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
44:3The offer of drink to him ‘that is athirst’ is taken up again by the prophet – Isa 55:1 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
44:5 The various ways in which people will name themselves indicates that the prophet is speaking of a time when Israel will have repented and turned to God. Sadly this did not happen when Israel returned from Babylon, but it will happen when Christ returns. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.2 Jesurun (KJV) in all other places is rendered Jeshurun. This name comes from a root word meaning to be blessed. Jeshurun is an epithet for Israel. V.8 Israel was chosen by Yahweh to be His witnesses (See Isa 43:12). One of the greatest proofs that Yahweh exists is the Jews. Considering history, the Jews should have been wiped out a long time ago. Many people have tried to exterminate the Jews, but Yahweh has promised to always keep a remnant (v.21). Out of a nation that Yahweh numbered as the sand of the sea only a relative few will remain when Jesus returns to save them from Gog, the latter-day Assyrian (Isa 10:22). V.28 Cyrus was a type of Messiah who would save Yahweh’s people. Cyrus began his rule in 550 BC. This was 150 years after Isaiah penned this prophecy. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
ch 44 vs 14-17 shows a charactaristic of human nature that we must guard against even though we refrain from making a physical idol. It is as follows, we take what God has created and given us v14, then with that satisfy our own 'needs' to be warm and fed and then with what is left, the residue v17 & 19, we worship. Do we use God's blessings to look after ourselves first or do we do as Abel did and return to God the first and best (fat) of what he has blessed us with Gen 4v4? Lindsay Yuile [Glasgow South Scotland (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Lindsay |
||||||||||||||||||
44:3 The water’ poured upon the thirsty is not to be seen as literal water. Rather it is the ‘water of life’ Rev 21:6 given to them that ‘thirsteth’ for God Psa 42:2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| v.4
- Using the same theme as Isaiah (above) we see that men are not just ordained
to righteousness, but also to evil. It is important for us to realise that God
uses the evil of man to shape those who are called according to his promise. Let
us keep our eyes and ears open to recognise the evil and avoid it. Gal.2:4,
Eph.4:14, 2Tim.3:6, 2Pet.2:1,2. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Jude appeals to
a number of Old testament incidents v.5 The Exodus v.6 Korah Dathan and Abiram v.7 Sodom and Gomorrah v.9 The returning captives [Zechariah 3:2] v.11 Cain v.11 Baalam v.11 Korah [again] to reinforce his assertion that the problems that were being experienced were not new. The warning from these individuals and events appealed to is that such practices bring death. Even those who were 'saved out of Egypt perished.The warning is clear for us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
Jude is writing to combat errors that have already crept into the ecclesias. Nortice the way in which he speaks of things in the past tense
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| :5
It seems unlikely that we would forget that Israel were destroyed in the wilderness
even though they had been saved from Egypt. However Israel forgot - that is what
one generation fell in the wilderness, and it seems that the brethren to whom
Jude wrote had forgotten also. No it is certain that neither Israel in the wilderness
nor the brethren to whom Jude wrote had actually forgotten what happened. Rather
they had stopped thinking about the implications of those things. Hence Jude draws
attention to some events in the wilderness. Israel's problem that they did not
believe that God would work in their lives. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Jude 24.Can we begin to understand the meaning of these words which speak of you and me, being presented faultless, or unblemished, before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy. Yes, Brethren and Sisters, this is our Heavenly Father’s intention for each one of us. When we think on these closing words of Jude we are drawn closer to our Heavenly Father and to His Son, who has made such a destiny possible for us. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
| 1:15 'to execute judgement upon all' quotes Psalm 149:7 giving the Psalm an application to the first century ecclesia. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.6 Jude uses historical examples to illustrate his points. They often seem mystical and leave room for the unlearned to make wrong conclusions. For example, the angels cannot be referring to heavenly beings since they would live forever. The reference must be to earthly angels (i.e. messengers); probably, in this case, Korah, Dathan, and Abiram. V.9 Michael, the archangel and the devil contending for the body of Moses is not a tussle between two supernatural entities over a corpse. The reference goes back to the return of the Israelites from Babylon. At that time it was difficult for some priests to be able to identify themselves as bona fide and they were not allowed to serve (Ezra 2:62). Thus, there arose a dispute between the discontented group (the devil) and those in authority (Michael) over the priesthood (the body of Moses). (See my note for Ezra 5,6 on Nov 10). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
1:1 Those who are ‘sanctified’ are also ‘preserved’ – Not only does God separate us from the world to be heirs of the promises. He also takes care of us. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| SAVE THEM "Be merciful to those who doubt; snatch others from the fire and save them; to others show mercy, mixed with fear - hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh." (Jude 22,23) The issue Jude was concerned about was that of false teachers who pose as members of our churches, but are really trying to draw us away from the truth of the gospel. When people like this come into our churches, others are going to be deceived. Along with those who are convinced of the lies, there will be some who follow because they trust those on who the deception has been successful. So Jude's message to us is to do all we can to help these people, to break down the deception, and bring them back to the way of life. We can't do it by being harsh and judgemental, so he says, "Be merciful to those who doubt." Feel for them because they have been deceived. Gently show them the right way and forgive. "Snatch others from the fire and save them." The fire he speaks of is the fire of judgement. We need to be strong and forceable with these people because there is not much time left before their spirituality will be lost completely. "To others show mercy, mixed with fear - hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh." We must hate sin and it's products, but show love and mercy to God's people. Let's not leave it too late, but make every effort to save all we can. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||||||||
|
1:3 The ‘common salvation’ contrasts with the exclusivity of both the Jews who would not have any place for the gentiles in their understanding of God’s relationship with man. It also contrasts with the exclusivity of those who shared the attitude of Diotrophes – 3John 1:9. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
| Jude:2 This short letter is written to those who have been called (V.1). Jude shows his true feelings by expressing his thoughts in three parts: mercy; peace; and love. Throughout this work we can see this threefold scheme being developed. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||||||||
1:7 Gen 19:25 records that the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah whilst it is Deut 29:23 that records the list of the cities in the plain that were destroyed. Jude draws together the historical narrative and adds details from the later account in de. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
:7 Gen 19:24 records that the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah whilst it is Deut 29:23 that records the list of the cities in the plain that were destroyed. Jude draws together the historical narrative and adds details from the later account in de. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
V.1 Jude is the brother of James. He does not specify whether James is the Lord's brother or James the son of Alphaeus (Matt 10:3). And so, Jude was either the Lord's brother, or his cousin (John 19:25) (Cleophas = Alphaeus). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
1:4 Jude’s use of ‘are’ here and similar language in the rest of the letter indicate that he is not anticipating problems arising in the Church. Rather they have arrived already. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||
The last 2 verses of Jude (Jude 24,25) speak of the saving power of God, through Jesus. a) He can keep us from falling prey to sin; and b) He can cover our sins by the work of Jesus Christ, so that we are allowed past the judgement seat and given a place in the kingdom. All praise must therefore be to our God both now and ever. Amen. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to David |
||||||||||||||||||
V.7 The phrase eternal fire is describing the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. The cities do not exist today. Fires are nowhere to be seen in the area today. And so, what does the term eternal fire mean? It signifies that the fire which rained down on those cities completely and utterly destroyed them forever. The same figure is applied by Jesus, where He talks of everlasting fire (Matt 18:8; 25:41). Similarly, Jesus talks about a situation where the fire is not quenched (Mark 9:46,48). Jesus equates this with hell fire (Matt 18:9). What Jesus is conveying in these verses is complete and utter destruction forever. In no way are any of these verses talking about the pagan myth of a subterranean abode where a goat-like creature with a pitchfork torments people to eternity in the searing heat of incessant fire. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||||||||
| 1:1 This verse describes brethren and sister everywhere. Note that we are preserved for Jesus (ESV) This preservation process is on-going. Jacob was preserved, and thus all Israel (Gen 32:30) The same idea is found in Josh 24:17 - and remember that we, too, were once in bondage in Egypt. It applies to David (Psa 32:7), to the saints (Psa 37:28) and last, but not least to Jesus himself (Psa 25:21 Luke 17:33) Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK] Comment added in 2009 reply to Ken |
||||||||||||||||||
|
1:4 That those with error ‘crept in unawares’ should alert us to the ease with which error can arise amongst us and remain unnoticed. Maybe the error is voiced but not seen as being very important. Or we don’t want to make a fuss. So the error grows and before long the problem is far bigger than we ever imagined it would become! Problems should be addressed carefully immediately they arise. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||||||||