June 21

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - Ruth  3 and 4
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Ruth 3 online in the King James Version Listen to Ruth 4 online in the King James Version
Listen to Ruth 3 online in the New International Version Listen to Ruth 4 online in the New International Version

 

3 v.11 - The phrase 'virtuous woman' is only found here outside Proverbs, linking it quite clearly with the words of Solomon in Prov.31.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

3 v.15 The use of the vail in Scripture is interesting. These are all of the occasions where a vail is used as a covering. Notice the first relates to meeting a man and the second two relate to a widow. [Genesis 24:65 38:14 19] Of course the word for vail occurs may more times but typically with reference to the tabernacle or Solomon's temple whilst the New Testament uses typically relate to Moses' face shining.
3 v.18 The concept of sitting or standing still is seen in the following passages as indicating a willingness to wait for the Lord to act in His own good time. [Exodus 14:13 Numbers 9:8 1 Samuel 9:27 2 Chronicles 20:17 Psalm 37:3 - 5 Isaiah 28:16]

4 v. 3-6 Whilst the near kinsman seemed willing to have the inheritance of Naomi he was unwilling to take Ruth and raise up seed. Maybe he was concerned because she was a Moabitess, or maybe he saw his own family needs as taking precedence over the law.
4 v.4 The method of dealing with the inheritance is seen to match that of Abraham buying the cave of for the burial of Sarah. [Genesis 23:18] And also the way in which Jeremiah redeemed the field in Anathoth. [Jeremiah 32:7 - 9 10 - 12 25] The details of the law regarding redeeming a parcel of ground is found in. [Leviticus 25:25 - 29]


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
4 v.13 - Let us remember that children are from the Lord.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

3:11 That Ruth was a 'virtuous woman' echoed in Proverbs 31:10 shows us that this description in Proverbs is not speaking of a particular woman - but that the virtuous woman is in fact the ecclesia. The characteristics of Ruth - and the virtuous woman of Proverbs 31 should be seen in the ecclesia.

4:18-22 The 'family tree' here given is matched exactly in Matthew 1

Pharez
|
Hezron
|
Ram
|
Aminadab
|
Nahshon
|
Salmon
|
Boaz
|
Obed
|
Jesse
|
David
Phares
|
Esron
|
Aram
|
Aminadab
|
Naason
|
Salmon
|
Booz
|
Obed
|
Jesse
|
David

Further reinforcing the point that the life of Ruth typifies the call of the gentiles as the bride of Christ.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

3:2-5 The way that Naomi spoke to Ruth about Boaz being a 'near kinsman' indicates that Ruth knew what the law of Moses said about raising up seed to the dead brother. Her behaviour in the latter verses of this chapter should be read in that light, especially as Boaz speaks to Ruth in a similar way (:12-13)

ch 4 - The 'near kinsman' here is behaving rather like Onan - another of the tribe of Judah (Genesis 38:4). One might have thought this 'near kinsman' might have learnt from the example of Onan.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

3:14 Western 21st century moral values would see some inappropriate moral behaviour in Ruth. However in lying at his feet she was showing a state of submission.

4:12 In likening Ruth to Tamar and the offspring Pharez the women are conscious of the way in which Tamar bore seed after the death of her husband.

But notice that they speak of the second born son - not the firstborn.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
 4:2 In ordinary circumstances, two or three were sufficent to attest a bargain; but in cases of importance, such as matrimony, divorce, conveyancing of property, it was the practice of the elders to have ten. 1Kin 21:8
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

3:4,7 The term to uncover the feet (Heb. galah) implies physical exposure, as with the  captives being led bare to exile.  Under the instruction of her mother-in-law, Ruth was trying to capture the willingness of Boaz to act as a near-kinsman. 

The opposite expression to cover the feet (Heb. cakak) (1Sam 24:3) implies isolation, protection or shielding, and is used as a means of expressing modesty in performing toilet necessities.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
There's a very sad comment in Ruth 4:6.  The near kinsmen was worried about "maring his own inheritance".  But who WAS he?  What was his inheritance?  He's nameless in Scripture.  This is what happens to people who despise God's law, and refuse to act as God instructed.  Yes, I know the end result brought about God's plan, so that Boaz could marry Ruth, but I still suggest the kinsman was wrong.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

When we read the last verse of the book of Ruth, I think we gain an appreciation of why the book was written. It traces the ancestry of David through the time of the Judges.

God had made promises in Eden which He was going to keep. There was going to be a way back to the tree of life through a promised ancestor. The whole of the old testament, then, could be seen as a chronicle of the lives of one family line leading eventually to the promised man Jesus. It was important, therefore, to fill in the gaps, setting the scene for the emergence of David his ancestor.

It's quite amazing to see that despite the general imorality and turning away from God which the rest of the populous was experiencing, the line of David was not. All of Israel was of the lineage of Jacob, and so the promised ancestor Jesus could have come from any of that stock. However, through the faithfulness of this particular family God was working to bring the man David to birth, who would later receive further promises and have the old promises confirmed. A point worthy of consideration is how the faith of one gentile sinner (Rahab), and her marriage to a man of Israel (Salmon), produced such Godly offspring as Boaz, and in turn the faith of one Gentile widow (Ruth) combined with his faith to produce a fertile seedbed for the family of David to spring up from. We ought to consider in all our actions the effect they will have on generations to come. The rewards of devotion to God, and His ways, will benefit our families for many generations to come.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Rob

.3:9 ‘a near kinsman’ actually means in the Hebrew ‘one who hath the right to redeem’. And as such Boaz was in a very privileged position. As was the nearer kinsman. It was not just a matter of raising seed. It was a matter of ensuring that the inheritance did not pass out of the family.

 4:20 The genealogy given here enables us to establish that the events of the book of Ruth took place very early in the days of the Judges


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

3:3,4,9,11,13,16,17,18 -- v3-4 Ruth is told to wash, anoint/perfume, and put on her best clothes (NIV) and sleep near Boaz which is perhaps symbolic of a baptism and being buried with Christ which includes Gentiles; v9 Ruth is asking for marriage to Boaz a kinsman/redeemer much as we hope to be accepted as the bride of Christ; v11 Boaz notes her noble character and agrees she will be redeemed/married; v13 she then sleeps that night until morning which perhaps suggests the concept of death and resurrection (being redeemed); v16-18 Ruth is given 6 measures of barley much as we are fed by Christ although it is not quite the millenial rest which would be represented by the number 7 as in 7th day (2Pet 3:8).

4:1,2,5,6,8,9,10,12,16,17 -- v1-2 here we have Boaz/Christ at the gate (gate of judgment? as the number "10" is thought by many to mean "judgment and/or perfection of Divine order" and perhaps the earlier use of the number "10" suggests an unfavorable judgment for the men in Ruth 1:4); v5-6 perhaps the closest kinsman represents the Law of Moses which didn't redeem, only through Christ can we be redeemed as only he could fulfill the Law; v8-10 Boaz pays the price to redeem and thus acquires the land (the millenial kingdom of God on earth?) and marries Ruth (the faithful Gentile Ruth is united with Christ as his bride to reign on earth in the kingdom?); v16-17 Naomi, a faithful Jew, is included in this family and the child, Obed (5744) meaning "serving" is a product of both these women bearing fruit (fruitfulness) in service to Christ; v12 we remember Judah grudgingly gave Tamar, a Gentile, her inheritance and their child, Perez, had a brother with a scarlet thread on his wrist which is not unlike the scarlet thread from the window of Rahab's home which is perhaps symbolic of the link to Christ's sacrifice and resurrection giving them and us hope. Some of the above was gleaned from Judges and Ruth by H.A.Whittaker p205-235.

 


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

3:11 The way that the word ‘virtuous <02428> is translated elsewhere helps us to understand what it is to be" virtuous" Here are some typical occurrences.

Gen 47:6     Activity

Exo 14:4      host

Deut 3:18     war

Josh 1:14    valour

So we see a ‘virtuous’ woman is industrious. Of course it is not just women who are to manifest these qualities. It is the duty of all of us to add ‘virtue’ to our knowledge 2Pet 1:5


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
3:1 The Hebrew word for "seek " is BAQASH (1245) is another one of many powerful words that we must look at to fully appreciate. It is full of exhortation for all today. Naomi, here is showing her concern for Ruth, and expressing her care for Ruth in action. Going back to Gen 37:15-16 we read of Joseph's concern for his brethren. The word can be translated "strive after; procure; plead; search out". Moses when speaking words of direction and exhortation to Israel "that if they seek out the Lord their God, he will never leave them". Deut 4:29-31 The lesson for us in the 21st. century is of course that we must show our care and concern for all of like precious faith, as we see the care extended to and the concern Naomi had for her daughter in law. Seeking a rest in Christ for them. Matt 11:29.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John

3:11   That Ruth was known in the town of Bethlehem s a virtuous woman must indicate that her manner of life was evident to all who would, one supposes, have been surprised at a Gentile – a Moabitess no less – being Godly. Surely a credit to Naomi’s instruction of her daughter in law.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

3:9 The word kinsman is translated from the Hebrew word gaal whose root means to redeem.  And so, Boaz, as a kinsman, redeemed the inheritance of Mahlon by marrying his wife Ruth, thus, perpetuating life through their offspring (4:10). 

Likewise, Jesus is our kinsman.  He has redeemed us from death and, thus, has perpetuated our inheritance (Heb 9:15).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

3:10 The inference we might draw from Boaz’s comments is that Ruth, a young woman, was speaking with a significantly older man.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

3:2 In the ancient Near East, winnowing was done in the evening. After the heat of the day, breezes would blow which lasted into the night.  The grain was tossed up and caught in a sieve.  The grain would remain in the sieve while the chaff fell through to be blown away.  The threshing floor was located in the field.  An area would be cleared and rolled to make a firm floor.

3:9 See yesterday’s notes on the word skirt (wings).

3:12 Naomi was probably unaware of this fact.

3:13 When a person utters the expression: as the LORD liveth (KJV), he/she is swearing an oath by the Name of Yahweh.

4:5-8 These verses are grounded in the Law (Deut 25:5-9).

4:11 The Hebrew word for witnesses is ed.   You might recall, in a recent reading, that this word was presented as a proper noun by the Reubenites and Gadites (Josh 22:34).

Under the Law, a Moabite would not to be allowed into the community of Israel until the tenth generation (Deut 23:3).  However, this prohibition probably did not extend to women.  In any case, Ruth had demonstrated her faith and commitment in Yahweh the God of Israel.  And, because she had married a man of Israel in good standing, she was welcomed into the community.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
Naomi wasn't simply being a matchmaker for her daghter-in-law.  She was attempting to fulfill the requirements of Deut 25:5
Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken

4:13  Notice ‘the Lord gave her conception’ the child hat was born was not a child of the flesh. Rather he was a child of the Spirit through the intervention of God. Fitting for the one who was to be in the line of Jesus.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

3:18  The idea of patient endurance - being still and waiting for God to carry out his purpose - is found throughout scripture, perhaps most impoirtantly in the exhortation to us in Psa.46:10  "Be still and know that I am God. I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth."


Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken

3:9  The idea of being covered by Boaz's garment is a token of an engagment to be married.  A similar idea is expressed quite marvellously in relation to Israel, but by extension to us, in Ezekiel 16:8-9 "When I passed by you again and saw you, behold, you were at the age for love, and I spread the corner of my garment over you and covered your nakedness; I made my vow to you and entered into a covenant with you, declares the Lord GOD, and you became mine. Then I bathed you with water and washed off your blood from you and anointed you with oil."

Both Ruth and we are gentiles and God has entered into a covenant with us, through Jesus.  We are "engaged" to him, awaiting the marriage.

We've been bathed with the water of baptism and the blood of sin has been washed from us. Just as future Kings were anointed, the anointing points to the time when, God willing, we may serve in the Kingdom.


Ken Trelfer [Kettering, UK]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Ken
Reading 2 - Isaiah 45
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Isaiah 45 online in the King James Version
Listen to Isaiah 45 online in the New International Version

 

v. 7 - We have a reference here back to creation. Notice that having created light and darkness, he then separates the two. Gen1:4. This moves us on to the light that we can experience in the face of Jesus Christ - 2Cor.4:6.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.4 - Again we see God calling Israel by name, and sadly they don't know it. God calls all of us who turn to Him by name. He knows us personally - amazing as this seems to us, having only the ability to know a handful of folk so well - and He sees to our every need. This degree of love, which spreads even to giving us eternal life, starts by knowing our name. We have to respond, as Israel did not. We have to recognise His saving grace and worship at His footstool.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
v.1 - The mention of ‘Cyrus’ by name troubles those who deny the existence of God - they suggest that this part of Isaiah was written after the end of the Babylonian domination. However we know that our God is capable of [Isaiah 46:10] ‘Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure’
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
CHOSEN BY GOD - Imagine the surprise, astonishment and awe that Cyrus must have felt when he was shown this prophecy. It was written by Isaiah long before Cyrus was named - or even born! It described Cyrus's life's work in such detail that Cyrus had no alternative but to sit up and take note of what God had to say to him about returning the Jews back into their land. He learnt that he was a chosen vessel in God's plan.
We too have been chosen before we were even born. Most of us have not been named in the Word as far as we can see, but we have certainly been chosen and predestinated in the same way as Cyrus was. Paul tells us this in Ephesians, "God chose us in Christ before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestinated us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ." (Eph 1 v 3 - 5)
And in Romans 8 v 28, we read that "for those God foreknew he also predestinated to be conformed to the likeness of his Son."
And Peter also says in the introduction to his first letter, To God's elect ... who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God ... for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood." (1 Peter 1 v 1 - 2)
God chose Cyrus, and Cyrus completed the task God had set him. God has also chosen us to become like Jesus, to be holy and blameless and to obey. Let us make sure we complete the task God has given us.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
:22-25 So Israel - and the gentiles for that matter - are invited to look to God because the idols are vanity. God has provided salvation in the person of His son 'that at the knee … swear' Romans 14:11 Philippians 2:10
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
45:13 The city that God will build is Zion (Psa 102:16)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.25 Babylon; the lady of kingdoms: is typical of a world given to pleasures, dwelling carelessly, (V.8) trusting in wickedness and perverted by wisdom and knowledge. (V.10) having a multitude of "experts" who will be helpless in the day of calamity. (V.13-15
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

 

Vs.1-5  Cyrus foreshadows Jesus, who was to come to save His people (v.4).  Look at the language: 

-Cyrus is called anointed (Heb. mashiyach = messiah) whose right hand was held by Yahweh (v.1; Psa 73:23). 

-The crooked places would be made straight before him (v. 2; Isa 40:3,4; Luke 3:4-6).

-The gates of brass broken (v. 2; Psa 107:16). 

-Both the Christ-type Cyrus, whose name means sun, and the Lord Jesus were in the foreknowledge of Yahweh and were proclaimed before their missions (Mal 4:2; 1Pet 1:19,20).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael
V.23 God swears by Himself (Gen 22:16), because He could swear by no higher authority (Heb.6:13), that to Him "every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear"
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

The Lord God has done, and does, everything. It’s interesting to note that even “evil” has been permitted to come on the earth by God (Isa 45:7).  For the millions of people who do not recognise our God, or worship Him, there is a huge shock ahead of them when they realise that the complete Power-source of our world is God.  Let us never forget it, too.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

45:5  The claim ‘there is no God beside me’ can be made by the God who is able to predict the future with accuracy. Fulfilled prophecy is the challenge that Yahweh is God. Every fulfilled prophecy confirms this truth.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

V.5-7 The Persians had their gods for light and darkness, for peace and evil; but the Jew who experienced the evil of captivity, and the joy of release, and who understood from the light of God's Word, that God had brought darkness over them for their sins and disobedience, would understand that there was but one God, the God of Israel.


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to John
V.17 - Israel will be saved with an everlasting salvation (upon Christ's return to establish the kingdom of God on earth Acts 1:9-11; Zech 12:10; Matt 5:5; Rev 5:10)
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Charles

45:9 The questioning of the potter by the clay here is contrasted – Isa 64:8– with the way that the faithful will respond to God’s instruction.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

45:17 The ‘everlasting salvation’ speaks of the salvation that is brought about by the work of Jesus – Heb 5:9


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.7 God is the creator of evil. The word evil is translated from the Hebrew ra which means bad.  And so, anything bad that happens, whether moral or physical, is allowed to take place because Yahweh has created the conditions for it to happen.  Yahweh, Himself, brings disaster on people and places.  But, this is done by Him, in righteous retribution, unlike most human actions.  Evil must not be confused with sin which is disobedience to God.  Obviously, God cannot be the creator of sin.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

45:14 The way in which the nations round Israel will, in the kingdom, say ‘surely God is in you’ is the basis for Paul’s words – 1Cor 14:25


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.9 This statement was made essentially to ward off any Jewish objections as to the reason a Persian (Cyrus) was to be the Jewish liberator.  Why not a Jew (the Messiah Himself)?

Paul uses the same example of the potter to the Jews by bringing their attention to Jeremiah’s parable (Rom 9:21; Jer 18:1 etc.).

V.13 Cyrus was an idolater and not righteous in the spiritual sense. But, the expression I have raised him up in righteousness (KJV) means that Cyrus, like Jesus, was appointed to do the will of Yahweh (Isa 42:6).

V.16 Here, Yahweh turns to the sour discussion of Israel’s idolatry.

V.22 Yahweh declares that He is the only one who can save, not idols.  He appeals to Israel.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
Isa 45:23;Rom 14:10-12.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

45:6 The deliverance of Israel by the works of Cyrus, when it happened, was not for the benefit of Israel. Rather it was that God’s name would be magnified through the world. Likewise our salvation is for His glory.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Revelation  1 and 2
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Revelation 1 online in the King James Version Listen to Revelation 2 online in the King James Version
Listen to Revelation 1 online in the New International Version Listen to Revelation 2 online in the New International Version

 

1 v. 3 - We have here an instruction to be sure to read this prophecy, and it can be extended, surely, to refer to the whole of scripture. The point here is that we should not just read, but hear, and keep. The word keep 5083 carries the idea of looking after something that is very precious (like a jewel) very carefully so that it shouldn't get lost.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Overview. Many view the Revelation as a book of symbols and very difficult to understand. The focus of my comments as we look at the Revelation is to highlight elements of exhortation which flow from the book and which are timeless in their application.

1 v.3 - 'keep those words ...' indicates that the book contains instruction which can be practised in life. The lessons which flow from the book can be viewed as aspects of 'living the truth'.
1 v.7 - 'seven churches of Asia' It was 'all they which are in Asia' which had turned away from Paul. [2 Timothy 1:15]. That Jesus wrote specifically to them indicates that he is always seeking repentance.

2 v.10 - In speaking of tribulation for 'ten days' Jesus is reminding his readers that Daniel and his friends, who ate pulse for ten days because of their faith in God were delivered. [Daniel 1:12,14,15]


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

ch 1

the faithful witness
Psa 89:37
the Firstbegotten
Psa 89:27
the prince of the kings of the earth
Psa 89:27


Notice the three quotations from Psalm 89. This Psalm is an exposition of the promises to David. Therefore the use in Revelation 1 highlights the fact that Jesus is a fulfilment of the promises to David

ch 2

eat things sacrificed unto idols and to commit fornication
Acts 15:29
eat things sacrificed unto idols and to commit fornication
Acts 15:29
I will put upon you none other burden
Acts 15:28

These three quotations from Arts 15 demonstrate that the Judaising influence of the early first century was a real problem in two of the gentile ecclesias in Asia.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
YOUR FIRST LOVE

At a recent weekend family camp one of the topics of discussion was to compare courting days with our current marriage. During courtship we gave gifts, opened doors for our future partner, talked to each other, held hands and all the other things courting couples always do. The question was: Do we still do the nice things we did while we were courting now that we are married?. Why not? What has changed?

In the same way that many marriages change and have less spark as they grow older, so it can happen to our love for God. The same question applies. When we first gave ourselves to him we were enthusiastic, we read the Bible all the time, we were joyful for our salvation and had the peace of forgiveness. What has happened? Do we still do the things we did then? Why not? What has changed?

The church in Ephesus was troubled with loosing their first love and they didn't even realise it. The warning Jesus gave them is a warning for us as well"You have forsaken your first love. Remember the height from which you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first. If you do not repent I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place."

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert

1:9 If, as tradition has it, John was on Patmos as a prisoner he speaks lightly of his situation - likening his situation to that of those who are free to whom he wrote.

ch 2 - Jesus wrote to seven ecclesias in Asia. Why ecclesias in Asia? Maybe an indication is that 'all Asia' had forsaken Paul. (2 Timothy 1:15)


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Rev 1:3. There are seven blessings listed in the Revelation.
          ch. 1:3.
          ch.14:13.
          ch.16:15.
          ch.19:9.
          ch. 20:6.
          ch. 22:7.
          ch. 22:14.

John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to John

1:20 The "mystery" was not something which was mysterious - could not be known - rather, as is always the case in Scripture, it was something which had not been revealed. It was revealed in the same verse. The explanation is that the stars are the "angels of the seven churches". We should not be confused into thinking that Biblical "mysteries" are things we cannot understand.

2:6 In saying "I know thy works" which here is a positive comment we see that Jesus is quoting Psa 1:66 - a description of the man blessed by God.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter

 

The Apocalypse (Revelation) is a complex book largely written in symbols. Therefore, to understand what is being said demands the interpretation of those symbols. There can be some difference of opinion over this, and so one should approach the work with humility. Care should be taken not to be dogmatic, which could lead to bigotry. This attitude is neither acceptable to Christ nor conducive to learning.  It is better to have an open and respectful exchange of ideas.

1:1; 4:1The Apocalypse, written about 90 AD, was for true believers to know what would happen in the last days (from the end of the first century onwards through to the return of Christ). Therefore, to ascribe events that happened before 90 AD to the book, is to defy its own parameters. Most events foretold in the Apocalypse have already taken place in history, i.e. subsequent to 90 AD. This tells us that the return of Christ is close at hand. Reviewing the foretold events of the Apocalypse, in the light of history, should bolster our faith; and knowing that Christ will soon be here should spur us to put our house in order.

The Revelation, or Apocalypse of Jesus, given through John, was about the things which must shortly come to pass (1:1). That is from near the end of the first century (when it was written) and onward.  The message was for the seven churches which are in Asia (1:4).  Of course, there were literally more than seven churches in Asia (and elsewhere), but the seven were selected, in microcosm, to show characteristics and conditions that would apply to all ecclesias. Thus, the message was to all true believers of the Gospel, the future kingdom of priests (1:6) (this is a more accurate translation than the KJV kings and priests).

2:6,15  The Lord hated the Nicolaitans.  Scofield says that this word comes from the Greek words nikao meaning to conquer, and laos meaning laity.  There was a usurping of power and control of one group over the rest of the ecclesia.  A priestly order or clergy was developing which would blossom into the hierarchical system of worship we see today in apostate Christendom.  This is in direct contradiction to Christ's commands (Matt 23:8). 

2:12-15 Pergamos (Pergamum) was founded by the Greeks and derives its name from pergamene meaning parchment for which the city was famous in producing.  It became an important, rich Roman city and had the reputation of being the first city in Asia.  There were many splendid temples dedicated to the gods Zeus (Jupiter), Athene, Apollo, and Aesculapius.  The characteristic idol of Aesculapius was a serpent.  There was much opposition to Christianity in Pergamos and thus the title Satan's seat is apt. The ecclesia at Pergamos had both faithful members and those who followed un-Christ like behaviors.  It is interesting to note that the Lord does not suggest that the faithful members leave the ecclesia and their wayward brethren at this point.  It is better to influence than abandon.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Michael

1:6  In speaking of us as ‘kings and priests’ Jesus is alluding to the Melchisedec priesthood which is our high calling.

2:14 ‘eat … fornication’ quotes Acts 15:29  indicating that a problem at Pergamos was the Judaising influence. Jesus is reminding the brethren and sisters to heed the letter sent out by the apostles after the discussion abut what was required of gentiles.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

The letters to the churches, although short, usually have an idea which is introduced in the description of Jesus at the beginning of each one, and then is reiterated in the the letter. The letter to Ephesus has the idea of Eden: Rev 2:1 shows Jesus walking among the lampstands as God walked in the garden in the cool of the day Gen 3:8 The Ephesians had left their 1st love & needed to repent otherwise they would be removed, as Adam & Eve were expelled from the garden. But for those who overcome, they are in the garden renewed, & eat of the tree of life.

The letter to Smyrna has the theme of life & death; the letter to Pergamum has the idea of the sharp double-edged sword = the Word of God, vs the false teachings, & the sword used in judgement; the letter to Thyatira has the theme of judgement - the eyes of fire, judgement on the followers of Jezebel, judgement given to the saints.

 


Wendy Johnsen [Nanaimo, BC, Canada]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Wendy

1:8 in describing himself as ‘the beginning and the ending’ quoting Isa 44:6 highlights that he has a name ‘above every name’ – Phil 2:9


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

1:5      The use of ‘faithful witness’ to speak of Jesus draws attention to Psa 89:27– which speaks of the son promised to David as being a ‘faithful witness’


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

HE KNOWS US

 

As Jesus wrote to the seven churches, it is appropriate that he opened his first letter with the description of himeslf as the one who "walks among the seven golden lampstands." (Rev 2:1) What this means is that Jesus is present in all the churches - whether we notice him or not. That is why he continues, "I know your deeds, your hard work and your peserverance." (v.2) Jesus knew all bout the church at Ephesus. He knew all the people there. He knew the state of their dedication, how hard they were working, how they carried on against all the odds, and of course, he knew their faults.

 

Jesus is still the one who walks among the churches. He still knows each church intimately. He could have been writing to our church when he said, "I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance." But what would he say about your church? As we read through the rest of the letters to the churches, we should pick up on the things that he would say to our church and act on them. We may not be able to change a whole church, but when we change ourselves we can have a huge influence on everyone around us.

 

What would Jesus say to our church? How can we make change for good?


Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Robert

1:9 One might have thought that it was John who was in tribulation – confined to the Isle of Patmos – however he identifies with those to whom he wrote, though they doubtless were not suffering the privations that John suffered.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

Revelation after discussing the seven churches in the first three chapters goes into language which is heavy on symbolism and as Rev 1:1-3 explains, it is a prophecy.

One interpretation, which has been around for centuries, is the continuous historical. The continuous historical is probably the best known interpretation. A proponent of the continuous historical was the English Bible Scholar Joseph Mede (1556-1639). Writing about 150 years ago, Dr John Thomas was a more recent proponent. One of the references frequently quoted in support of the continuous historical is Amos 3:7 "Surely the Sovereign Lord does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets." Critics question to what extent prophetic detail need be assumed to fulfill the intent of Amos 3:7. Other critics suggest that such detailed prophetic interpretations of historical events are possibly lacking in accuracy and/or require periodic revision in the light of seemingly more spiritually significant recent events. The continuous historical takes the approach that Revelation is a continuous prophetic unraveling of spiritually significant history starting soon after 96AD (the approximate date many feel the Revelation to John was given/compiled) till the the future establishment of the millenial Kingdom on Earth.

A second interpretation of Revelation is the futurist view which tends to crowd much prophecy in what still remains future. A.D. Norris was one of its 20th century proponents. Some of the criticisms are it leaves centuries of relative prophetic darkness and much of it hasn't soon taken place after 96AD. Also, some critics would note there is an interpretation of Jesus' birth Rev 12:5 which would be prior to 96AD. The continuous historical would interpret Rev.12:5 as referring to Constantine. Proponents of the futurist interpretation would suggest that the account of Jesus' birth prior to 96AD provides background context and thus doesn't violate the prophetic validity.

A third interpretation of Revelation is the preterist view which has the Revelation given to John prior to 70AD with much of the prophecy (i.e. Seals and Trumpets) fulfilled prior to the 70AD fall of Jerusalem although there are some lesser elements of the continuous historical and futurist views such as the last days and the second coming of Christ. H.A. Whittaker was a 20th century proponent of the preterist interpretation which also has its critics. 


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

Where can we find resources on various interpretations of Revelation so that with prayerful study we can be better informed?

There are a number of venues containing books on or promoting the continuous historical interpretation. There are books such as "Eureka" (5 volumes) by Dr John Thomas , "Thirteen lectures on the Apocalypse" by Robert Roberts, "The Book of Revelation" (Expositor Series) by H.P. Mansfield, "The Apocalypse and History" by W.H. Boulton, "The Revelation - Which Interpretation?" by Graham Pearce, etc.

A book on the futurist interpretation is called "Apocalypse for Everyman" by Alfred Norris. It is freely available online. If you do a google.com search for "apocalypse for everyman" the first listing (as of this posting) is "- Apocalypse For Everyman - Carelinks - www.carelinks.net". This listing contains the book in its entirety.

A book on the preterist interpretation is "Revelation - A Biblical Approach" by H.A. Whittaker. As I live in the USA, I found it locally available at the Detroit Christadelphian Book Supply under the category of controversial subject matter.


Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

Jesus Christ was seen by John in the middle of the 7 churches. From where he was imprisoned on Patmos, these were probably the nearest ecclesias. They obviously stand for the whole ecclesial world. Jesus had a long garment from head to toe, and the girdle was around his chest. Note that girdles used to be about the waist, but the Lord is now in Heaven, and has no nakedness to hide. So His breastplate, as it were, is a golden girdle. His head and hair are pure white, symbolising purity. Both His eyes and His feet look like fire. In His hand he holds the 7 messengers (or elders) of the 7 ecclesias. What a wonderful picture of Christ and his world-wide ecclesia!                                   

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to David

 

The Apocalypse has a strong relationship with the Book of Daniel.  Where Daniel stopped and sealed up his prophecy, Jesus opened it and continued (Dan 12:4,9; Rev 5:2-5,9).

1:4 The seven spirits are an echo to the seven eyes  from Zechariah (Zech 3:9).

V.7 The expression: Behold, he cometh with clouds is a reference to Daniel's vision (Dan 7:13). But what are these clouds which accompany Jesus?  As well as being weather phenomena, clouds can be used figuratively to mean many people. Consider the cloud of witnesses (the faithful of Jesus) in Heb 12:1). These faithful witnesses will the immortalized when Jesus returns, and will be with Him in His campaigns and in His rule from Jerusalem (See, also, my note on 1 Thessalonians 4:17 for Nov 17).

1:8,11 Alpha is the first letter of the Greek alphabet, and omega is the last.  Jesus is saying that He is the first and the last (v.17).  Jesus is the express image of Yahweh, His Father (Heb 1:3).  And so, Yahweh has always been the first and the last (Isa 44:6; 48:12).

1:12 The seven golden candlesticks (KJV) is better translated seven golden lampstands (ESV). They represent the seven ecclesias mentioned in v.11.  The number seven represents completeness.  There were more than seven ecclesias, of course, but these seven were a complete representation of all.

1:16 The seven stars represent a complete representation of ecclesial elders (teachers, leaders) (Dan 12:3; Acts 14:23). Right hand represents strength and power (Isa 48:13; Heb 1:13; 12:2).

1:20 The Lord’s explanation of vs.12,16.

2:11 Those who have died will be brought back to life for judgement by Jesus. The second death (permanent) will be administered to those who will be rejected at the judgement.

2:14 See Num 3:16.

2:28 Jesus is the morning star (Rev 22:16).  Those who have been accepted at the judgment will share glory with Him in the Kingdom.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

2:27The ruling with a rod of iron is not the despotic rulership of a tyrant. Rather Jesus – in fulfilment of Psa 2:9 – will ensure that God’s laws will be observed.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter