|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 20
v.5 - It is quite clear that this provision is not a suggestion that God condones
murder, simply that he recognises that accidents sometimes happen, and that the
people involved need protection. There is no refuge for the person who killed
purposely or who killed someone that he hated. We have a refuge in God. Let us
bear in mind the 'terms and conditions' set out here and apply them to our own
lives in Christ, and to the new covenant based on love. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
20 v.1-6 The appointment of the cities of refuge shows that Yahweh was merciful to those who were not premeditated murders. This foreshadows the work of the Lord Jesus Christ. Of the faithful servants of God who are baptized into Jesus it is said that they have fled for refuge [Hebrews 6:18] Chapter 21 - In the wilderness the Levites had their tents around the tabernacle and provided a focus for the people. Approaching the tabernacle and seeking counsel of the priest were, to a large extent, one and the same thing. However now the nation were distributed over a far larger area - the land of Canaan, the priests were dispersed throughout the whole of the nation to provide easy access to the teachers and judges in the law. No man was able to make the excuse that the priests were too far away when a matter of controversy arose. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 21
v. 3 - The act of giving of the land to the Levites was one of great and apparently
willing generosity. Perhaps we should adopt the same attitude when we are required
to give of our money or time to further the work of the Lord. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
In particular the law regarding the city of refuge that the manslayer was to remain in the city until the death of the high priest (20:6) is so powerfully a foreshadowing of the work of Jesus - our high priest. 21:11 In describing Hebron as a city 'in the hill country of Judea' we are provided with an indication of the home of Elizabeth and Zacharias (Luke 1:39) for this is now the place where they lived is described in the gospel. Thus a careful reading of the text will further our appreciation of the details. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| A CLOSE REFUGE Six cities of refuge were given to Israel when Joshua divided up the land. Three of them had already been designated on the other side of the Jordan for the tribes of Rueben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh. And here, three others cities were designated as cities of refuge for the tribes on the west of the Jordan. The cities Israel were given were just about equally spaced throughout the land. This meant that the person who accidentally killed another person would not have too far to run - no matter where they were in the land of Israel at the time. The cities of refuge were as close as they could be to anyone who needed them, and no-one had to go further that anyone else to get to one. Today we do not have cities of refuge. We may even have a completely different sort of justice system. However, we still need to seek refuge from the effects of sin that are looking to take our life and serve up our wages - death. But for us the distance between where we are and our refuge is as close as a prayer. Wherever we are we have instant access to Jesus and the forgiveness of our sins. So let's take refuge with our High Priest and be saved from sin and death. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
20:9 The cities of refuge were for the benefit of both Jew and gentile (the stranger) so here we see another aspect of the provision of God in Christ. 21:43 The oath that God had made to give the land had been made to Abraham (Genesis 13:15 etc.) So this point marks a fulfilment, in part, of the promises to Abraham. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
20:4 That the manslayer was to declare his cause to the elders of the city in the gate gives incidental confirmation to our understanding that the gate of the city was the place of government - see Ruth 4:1-2 21 We have all probably noticed that all of the cities of refuge were appointed as cities for the priests. You will be able to identify
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 20:4 When the man was come to his city of refuge, he was to be met at the gate by the city elders, to whom he would declare his need. When they were satisfied that it was a legitiment cause. they were to "gather him into the city unto them", as though accepting him into their family, and they were to "give him a place", so that he might "dwell among them." John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Joshua have Caleb Hebron, but in the end he didn't actually possess it, as it became a city of the Levites. Caleb had the field and suburbs (Josh 21:9-11). David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
The six cities of refuge serviced Israel after the flesh - the number six representing one short of divine perfection. The seventh city of refuge, representing divine perfection, will be provided for the ransomed of Yahweh, Israel after the spirit. Here will be complete shelter from all danger (Rev 21:2-4; 22:14,15). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
20:2 That the people were to appoint cities of refuge at this point is a marker that as far as God was concerned the people were settled in the land, though there was still much work to do. This is a patter of our lives in Christ. Even though we have been baptized we have not attained to the stature of the full man in Christ. This will only happen at the resurrection. However there is the need to consolidate our faith and make provision in our lives for the needs of others. 21 We have seen that on three times 13:4, 14:3, 18:7 that the Levites had no inheritance in the land. Now they are given cities to dwell in from their brethren, at the command of God. This se the principle that the Levites were to be sustained by their brethren. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
21:43-45 This is the general winding up of the history from the 13th. chapter, which narrates the occupation of the land by the Children of Israel. All promises made, whether to the people, or to Joshua (Josh 1:5), had been, or were in the course of being fulfilled. The recorded experience of the Israelites (V.45) is a ground of hope for all believers in every age, that all the other promises made will, in the appointed time be fulfilled. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 20:5-9 - perhaps the "avenger of blood" perhaps represents the debt of death we owe due to sin. V7 refers to the "6" (6 perhaps representing man/flesh) cities "appointed" [Heb. "qadash" (6942) meaning "to be clean, consecrate, holy, purify, sanctify", etc.] so possibly this refers to the ecclesial elders offering a temporary ecclesial/baptismal refuge while awaiting full freedom from the "avenger of blood" who is still waiting for an opportunity. V9 "appointed" [Heb. "muwadah" (4152) meaning "an appointed place, asylum", etc.] perhaps suggests the worshipping in the appointed manner meeting each first day of the week in the temporary ecclesial refuge with the high priest in the midst (Acts 20:7; Matt 18:20) where followers wait for Christ's full return so can they can have full freedom from the "avenger of blood". V6 the death of the high priest (perhaps an echo of Christ's reaping the benefits of his sacrifice with his return to earth to fully conquer sin and death) fully wiped away debts/sins and the "avenger of blood" was no longer a threat allowing the unwillful sinner/slayer (Heb 10:26) to be fully free (from death) and return to his home/inheritance (millenial rest). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
20:4,5 The man fleeing the avenger (death) would seek asylum in a city of refuge. He would explain his plight to the elders at the city gate who would admit him and protect him from the avenger . Sometime later, a trial would be held to judge the validity of the refugee's claim (20:6). If his account rang true, he would be allowed to stay. If his story were untrue, he would be thrown out of the city to face the avenger and certain death.Our experience mirrors this account. We are fleeing the avenger (death) and find refuge in Jesus (Heb 6:18 ). After some time, we will face a trial to see if we are genuine or not (Rom 13:12). Some will be granted everlasting life, while others shame and everlasting contempt (Dan 12:2). Those who are accepted by the Lord at the judgement will remain in His refuge, in His rest (Heb 4:9). Those who are rejected will be thrown out into the world to face the avenger (death) (Matt 13:41,42).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
21:8 In keeping with the way in which the land had been divided by lot the cities for the priests were also assigned by lot – lest the people be tempted to give the priest the least appealing cities. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| SCATTERED TO SPREAD THE GOSPEL The Levites were given forty eight towns to live in throughout all Israel. All the other tribes received a chunk of land complete with its towns and villages. But the Levites received no other land than the pastureland around their towns. The other tribes were able to live together, but the Levites were scattered from one end of the nation to the other. There was a reason for this. The Levites were the people God had chosen to do his work. In essence, they were to point the rest of Israel toward God. So the fact that they were scattered like this meant that all Israel would learn from them and be served by them. Had the Levites inherited a piece of land, they would have stuck together and few Israelites would have been motivated to turn to God. But in their small groups throughout Israel they could have the widespread impact God intended them to have. This is probably the reason that we, as Christians, are spread all over the world. If we were in one big, self contained group, we would be far less effective at spreading God's message and pointing other people toward him. So let's make the most of the places God has put us. You might be the only person some people ever meet who can point them to Jesus. Our job is to make the most of those opportunities. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
For the possession of Hebron (20:10-12) see also Josh 14:14 (note May 28). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
20:3 ‘Unawares’ shows that the provision is to allow for a fair trial of the one who has killed a person. Entry into the city of refuge was not a means of escaping judgement. In like manner being ’in Christ’ where we have ‘fled for refuge’ – Heb 6:18 –does not free us from the judgement of death for sin. But we have a merciful God. Whilst under the law when the facts were established, if the slayer was guilty he would die, we are offered forgiveness if we confess. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
If we are seeking refuge from the "avenger of blood," it seems to me that places us in the category of "unwitting murderer." So I have to ask the question: how can we be a murderer? A possible answer to this: prior to making the death of the True High Priest a reality in our lives, we are perhaps "floating along" through life, and thereby spreading the confusing message to others that it is possible to live just fine without Jesus Christ. It rings of "he that gathers not with us, scatters abroad." Let us work diligently to acknowledge that we are purchased possessions, living only because of our merciful High Priest! Dyron Hamlin [Good Hope (AR, USA)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Dyron |
||||||||||
20:3,9 - In vs 3 we have a person being killed (by another individual) and the Hebrew word for "person" is "nephesh" (5315) which is often translated "soul". Similarly in vs 9 we have a "person" KJV or "someone" NIV being killed and the same Heb. word "nephesh" (5315) being used. Nephesh in its primary meaning stands for creature, a breathing creature man or animal. It is rendered variously soul, life, person, self, creature, etc. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
20:6 Even if the slayer is innocent of murder he was to remain in the city of refuge until the death of the high priest indicating that redemption from sin was to be achieved by the death of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Caleb's dwindling inheritance Can you imagine the following conversation: Caleb, I promise you can have all the land you walked on when you spied out the promised land (Num 14:24, Deut 1:35-36) But you'll have to wait 40 years for it (Josh 14:6-10) When I said "all the land" I actually meant just one city and its suburbs (Josh 14:13-14) You can go and live in it now. But you'll have to fight three Giants for it first (Josh 15:13-14 cp. Num 13:22, 32-33) By the way, now you've fought the Giants for it; I'm allocating your city to anyone who's fleeing the law because they've committed manslaughter. Hope you don't mind. So it'll be a bit more crowded than you first thought (Josh 20:1-7). Oh, and didn't I say? There's a whole bunch of Levites I've just promised the actual city to. And its surrounding land. So is it ok if you and your family move out and just have the villages? (Josh 21:11-12) How would you feel if that were you? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| Josh 20:5 - unwitting or accidental sins get forgiven as was the case with Paul who obtained mercy (1Tim 1:13); we are not to deliberately keep sinning (Heb 10:26); we can gain an initial refuge and favorable judgment via baptism (Josh 20:4) but the ultimate judgment and hope of refuge will be when Christ returns (Josh 20:6). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
21:25 So there are two cities of refuge on the East side of Jordan, in the territory of the two and a half tribes. Thus confirming that God was happy with the provision of an inheritance for those two and a half tribes . there. Of course the promises to Abraham extended way beyond the borders of what we now call the land of Israel Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| 26
v.3 - There is something to be learned from a look at the use of the word
5564, here translated 'stayed'. It represents a stay in the sense of something
to lean on, to be sustained by. There are 48 occurrences. Here are a few to help
with the idea. Gen27:37
Ps.3:5, sustained, Judges
16:29, borne up, 2Kings
18:21, lean, 2Chron.
32:8, rested. It is
interesting that this word is used for 'put' when the priest or the offerer 'puts'
his hand on the head of the sacrifice [Exo.29:10,15,19,
Lev.1:4, 3:2,8,13, 4:4,15,24,29,33, 8:14,18,22, 15:21, 24:14] Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26 v.20 enter thou into thy chambers, and shut thy doors about thee: hide thyself as it were for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast. Shows that despite the fact that He was executing judgment on the nation he was concerned that those who would listen to Him would be spared the horrors of His judgment. 27 v.6 Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit. Is a passage we often use to speak of the glories of the kingdom. Doubtless is does speak of this time but it marks a striking contrast with the words of Habakkuk 3:17. Habakkuk speaks of the Babylonian captivity [Habakkuk 1:6]. We may conclude that Isaiahs promise of blessing is speaking of a time after the Babylonian captivity and so maybe those returning exiles in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| ch. 26 - REPENTANCE
BRINGS SALVATION The relationship between repentance and salvation is clearly
defined in this song. It begins with God's people in distress after God had disciplined
them. They were so broken they could hardly whisper a prayer. It reminds me of
the prayer that Ezra spoke when his people sinned, "O my God, I am too ashamed
and disgraced to lift my face up to you, my God, because our sins are higher than
our heads and our guilt has reached to the heavens." (Ezra
9 v 6). Isaiah continues saying that they were in such distress it was like they were in the pains of childbirth - yet even in their desperation they couldn't do anything for themselves. They had to rely on God for their salvation. Salvation is the gift of God that he gives to the responsive heart, and repentance is one of the biggest steps toward that responsiveness. God's salvation is one of the most wonderful things we could ever imagine. He offers resurrection, life and joy in this short description. It is described as waking up on the most beautiful morning you have ever seen, waking up and shouting for joy, feeling the fresh dew of the morning on a day of new birth and no decay. Freshness, joy and brightness are yours if you begin your life today with repentance. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 27:2
- The vineyard of red wine is a reference to Song
5:1-7, where this idea is extended and clearly refers both to the nation of
Israel and to those who receive the promise. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:3 'Perfect peace' in the Hebrew is 'peace peace' (see margin in your Bible). As such it is echoed (57:18) as the cry of the Lord to the gentiles. 27:13 Trumpet shall be blown draws on the blowing of the trumpet at the year of Jubile when the slaves are released and everything returns to the owner - a foreshadowing of the kingdom. This is when Israel shall return in belief to the land of Israel. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
ch. 26 - Continuing the theme of the resurrection of Jesus from Isaiah 25:9 the 'dead men' living with 'my dead body' The dead men are those who were raised after Jesus' resurrection and 'my dead body' speaks of Jesus' resurrection (Matthew 27:52) ch. 27 - And more links with the time of the resurrection and the resurrection when Christ returns.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:20 I have been developing the way that this chapter speaks of the events of the resurrection of Jesus. The consequence of that resurrection is that we can be certain of ours. So the 'moment' when the 5ervants are hidden is death. Resurrection takes place out of the moments of death - hence Paul's comment (1Cor 15:52) 27:1 Whilst Leviathan is a symbol for Egypt we should see that Leviathan is somewhat more than that for we saw last year that this chapter speaks of the resurrection, continuing the theme of chapter 26. So Leviathan speaks also of the power of sin. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 27:2 Israel will again be grafted into the vineyard of God when it is replanted and encompasses the whole earth. It shall blossom and bud again (V.6) At that time the earth will be filled with good fruit John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 26:1,2 Isaiah continues the idea of the seventh city of refuge (see my note on today's Joshua reading). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| GOD'S VINEYARD God likened the people of Israel to a fruitful vineyard. Israel were his special people, the ones out of all the people on the earth he had chosen to be his own. He cared for Israel, he loved them and wanted them to love him. In all his dealings with them, God did what was best for his people to make them grow into a godly nation fit to inherit his kingdom for eternity. In the picture of the vineyard he describes his compassion and care like this: "Sing about a faithful vineyard: I, the LORD, watch over it; I water it continually. I guard it day and night so that no-one may harm it." (Isa 27:2-3) What more could we do for a vineyard? God did the best he could for Israel. Jesus said, "I am the true vine and my father is the gardener. ... I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit." (John 15:1,5) We are now branches of the Jesus vine in God's vineyard. Just as God cared for the Israel vineyard, so he cares for us and does all he can to make us more fruitful and prepared for eternity. Pruning hurts but it is good for us, and like Israel, God waters and protects us. Paul sums it up nicely when he says, "And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose." (Rom 8:28) Israel rebelled against God's care and provision. Let's not do the same. Instead we should appreciate and give thanks for all the care and support God supplies for us. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 27:8 Even in wrath God has continually shown mercy to Israel, God's dealing with her as His own people is different from the way that He deals with other nations. He punishes His people "in measure". He did condemn them, by driving them away into exile, but did not totally destroy them, as He did with many other nations. He always remembered the promises made to Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
| Our two chapter today speak of the kingdom. The picture can be summarised by Isa 26:13,14. Other lords have ruled over Israel, as the previous chapters have shown, but “they are dead”. Now the exiles have returned from Assyria and Egypt, and “shall worship the Lord in the holy mount at Jerusalem.” (Isa 27:13) David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
26:8 When Nehemiah prayed because of the desolation of Jerusalem – Neh 1:11 – he quoted these earlier words of Isaiah saying his desire was to God’s name’. 27:2 The ‘vineyard pf red wine’ contrasts with the barren vine of Isa 5:1-2 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:14,19 - we read two of the conditions regarding the dead (Psa 49:14,15,20); v14 refers to the dead who have no hope, no memory, they are destroyed, they will not rise; v19 refers to "Thy dead" shall live and their bodies shall arise. So this refers to those who are dead in Christ, those who are responsible and informed of God's word rising (unlike the animals and people of insufficient understanding who will not rise). For these there will be a resurrection and a judgment (Dan 12:2; Acts 24:15) with the wheat separated from the chaff, the sheep separated from the goats, the wicked he will destroy (Luke 13:28; Psa 145:20; Matt 21:41) and the righteous will reign with Christ on earth (Matt 5:5). I agree with Peter Forbes regarding the Leviathan, that crooked serpent, as being a symbol or personification of sin (or the power of sin). 26:21 mentions the Lord punishing the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity (KJV) or sins (NIV) and then one verse later 27:1 refers to the Lord slaying that crooked serpent/leviathan/dragon hence the connection with sin and we also read of Christ's victory over sin and where sin comes from Gen 3:14,15; Heb 2:9-15; Isa 53:12; Rom 6:23; James 1:14,15 Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
26:14The description of the state of the idea that Isaiah presents echoes the way that the wise man describes it – Ecc 9:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 26:13 The Jewish people, even though they have been persecuted, and without a home land that they could call their own until less than sixty years ago, they have never acknowledged any other God, other than the God of their father Abraham. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
26:14 The memory that perished was the memory of the threat of the Assyrian invasion which Jerusalem was delivered from in the days of Hezekiah. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
GOD'S LOVE Israel were, and still are, God's special people. He compared them to a vineyard and said this about them: "Sing about a fruitful vineyard: I the LORD watch over it; I water it continually. I guard it day and night so that no one may harm it." (Isa 27:2-3) There are a few things to notice about God's description of the way he loves and cares for Israel.
God loved Israel. He loves us in the same way. Let's respond to him in love also. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
26:1 The wonderful guarantee that God will be a ‘wall’ is taken up by the prophet – Zech 2:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:4 The first LORD in Hebrew is yahweh (See Exo 3:14); the second LORD is yah (a contraction of yahweh ; See Psa 68:4); and JEHOVAH is ab (Father; See Psa 89:26). 27:1 The epithets leviathan, serpent, dragon refer to Babylon. Babylon has been a source of ungodliness and opposition to Yahweh since the days of Nimrod (See my note for Gen 10:8, Jan 5). 27:4 The briers and thorns that oppose Yahweh are a reflection of Moab which is used as a synonym for any of Yahweh’s enemies (See my note for Isaiah 25, June 2). 27:12The term beat off in Hebrew is chabat. It is the same word as is used for the action of gleaning olives ( beatest, Deut 24:20). After the olives had been beaten off the tree they were gathered. The same idea is used here for waterways. The southern boundary of Judah, according to the tribal allotment, was the Wadi El-Arish (the stream of Egypt). In that day (the Kingdom) Yahweh shall beat the waters and gather them. This signifies that Israel will not be limited to the boundaries of the tribal allotment but will extend from the Nile to the Euphrates (river) (Psa 72:8). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Isa 27:9;Rom 11:26-27. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
26:9 I have shown in earlier comments on Isaiah 25 that this area of Scripture is Messianic. The phrase "have I desired thee in the night" echoes Song of Song 3:1 which seems to speak of the bridge looking for her beloved. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.10
- The theme of sanctification by Jesus is one of the hingepins on which this letter
pivots, going through from ch.2:11
to ch.13:12. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Having set the
scene in chapter 9 this chapter now focuses on the 'betterness' of the sacrifice
of Jesus over the day of Atonement. [10:1]
see the
list on the study pages
to see the links with Leviticus 16. Whereas the sacrifice on the Day of Atonement
could 'purify the flesh' [9:13]
the sacrifice of Jesus is able to 'purge the conscience' [9:14]
Consequently only needed to be offered 'once for all' [10:10] Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| HAVE CONFIDENCE
Do we really believe that Jesus Christ came and died so that we could be forgiven from all our sins? Sometimes I wonder when I look around the faces in the seats on a Sunday morning, whether people have come along to church to commiserate about their sinfulness and to ask for forgiveness, instead of coming to church to worship the God who has poured out so much grace on us and to rejoice in his forgiveness as we remember the way he gave it to us. If you were asked if you were going to be in God's kingdom, what would your answer be? Yes? No? Not sure? The reason Jesus died was so we could be forgiven. Repent - ask him - and he will wash you clean from your sins and make you new and holy for Him. After forgiveness we can be at one with God again. Let us rejoice in his forgiveness, and have the confidence to draw near to God in full assurance of faith. Let us have confidence to come into the presence of God because we are new, clean and forgiven sinless creatures. And let us be confident that in our clean forgiven state God will be pleased - by his grace - to give us the kingdom. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 10:1
The very repetitive annual offering of the sacrifice of the Day of Atonement shows
it was ineffectual at removing sin permanently. So the very nature of the annual
event should have taught Israel something. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :3
Whilst the sacrifices on the day of atonement were to remind Israel of their sinfulness
our remembrance of the sacrifice of Christ is not to remind us of our sins. Rather
it is to remind us that our sins have been forgiven (Matthew
26:26-28) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Heb 10:1. The writer, in comparing the law to a shadow is saying, that the real thing is always better than a reproduction. It is like comparing “2D” with “3D”. there really is no comparison. Heb 10:22-24. Faith, hope and love (charity) are the three great principles which summarize God’s dealings with man.(1Cor 13:13) Here we see that the Hebrews are exhorted to; John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 10:5-8 The quotation of Psalm 40 and it's subsequent exposition in these verses is most telling when it is realised that Psalm 40 was David's response to the forgiveness he received after his sin with Bathsheba. There was no sacrifice he could offer for his sins (Psa 40:6, 51:16) so he gave himself in service to his God. We should do likewise. We, like David, cannot repay the debt we owe. All we can give is ourselves in service to Him in thankfulness for the forgiveness that is available in Christ. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
Vs. 26,27 These verses in the KJV sound ominous and troubling. They do not mean that if we sin occasionally (as we undoubtedly will) after baptism into Christ, we are doomed. They mean that if we wilfully continue to sin (or as the NIV renders it: deliberately keep on sinning), then there is no hope of (ultimate) forgiveness. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:2 The rhetorical question ‘then would they not have ceased to be offered?’ is so powerful. It was the very repetitive nature of the Day of Atonement that highlighted it’s shortcomings. This argument is more powerful than any technical discussion about animals being unable to express willingness. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
10:19 The ‘boldness’ that we have to enter into the holiest contrasts with the way in which any priest would have felt of approaching the ‘holiest’ which was only accessed once every year by the high priest. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| The Day of Atonement was the most solemn in the Jewish year. The High Priest went into the Most Holy Place, and was granted forgiveness for the nation of Israel. In Heb 10:1-14 Jesus, the greatest High Priest, went into Heaven, the real Most Holy Place. He went in with His own blood, and actually is still there. He hasn’t as yet come out. When He does it’s our most solemn day. He will bring judgement, forgiveness and salvation. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||
10:26 The wilful sin which alienates one from the effectiveness of the sacrifice is Christ is, in the context of the letter to the Hebrews is the way in which the Jews were turning away from the sacrifice of Jesus to following the law of Moses again. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Heb 10:10 That we are ‘sanctified’ by Jesus’ willingness to obey his Father we see the same idea as had already been made in Rom 5:10 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.7 Volume (Gr.kephalis) means roll. Book must mean The Pentateuch (the first five books of the Bible written by Moses). The Pentateuch was written on animal skins and rolled up on two wooden knobs. Synagogues today have similar scrolls. V.9 Jesus is called the cornerstone (Eph 2:20; 1Pet 2:7). The cornerstone lay at the foundation of the building. Its function was to support two walls which met at right angles. As one wall finished, the other wall continued. Jesus was the foundation of both the old covenant and the new covenant. As the old covenant (the Law) finished, the new covenant (alliance in Jesus) continued. The first was taken away and the second was established. V.19 By His sacrifice, Jesus opened access to the Holy of Holies, the throne of Yahweh (Matt 27:51; Eph 2:14; Heb 9:3). That is the reason we can approach Yahweh directly in prayer in the Name of Jesus. V.37 This verse is reflected by Rev 3:11; 22:7,12,20. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
10:18 Those priests which believed – Acts 6:7 – may well have wondered whether they should still be offering animal sacrifices. The eternal benefit of Jesus’ sacrifice removed the need for any more animal sacrifices. In fact the offering of animals would show a lack of appreciation of what Jesus had done for them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Forgiveness - past tense In v26 we see the difference between a life in Christ, compared to the Law of Moses. With the law of Moses you could always make another sacrifice for sin. And another. But with Jesus there is only one sacrifice. And then no more. You can understand that the former might seem preferable, can't you? A visible confirmation that you're forgiven and are right before God again? In comparison the forgiveness through Jesus is invisible, intangible, and worst of all, in the past, not the future. The big example of this contrast is the forgiveness of David. He had killed a man and committed adultery with the man's wife. He sought a way in the law for him to be forgiven; a sacrifice he could make so that his forgiveness would be confirmed before his own eyes. Yet he couldn't find one (see Psa 51:16 "You do not desire sacrifice, or I would give it!") So David found himself in the same situation as the one we're faced with here in Hebrews 10. In v4 we read: "it is not possible for bulls and goats to take away sin" - just as David found out - and believe me, he searched for a way for it to be possible! Instead, David was broken down within himself, abject and despairing, feeling the weight of his own sin and the impossibility of forgiveness. Do you ever feel this way? It is in this state of mind that David realised the only way out or him was simply to trust in God. God would find a way, even though he didn't know what that would be. So he penned the words: "The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit,a broken and a contrite heart — These, O God, You will not despise." (Psa 51:17) God was true to this verse, because when He confronted David about his sin, and David confessed, God's answer was that He had already forgiven him (read 2Sam 12:13 and notice the past tense). We too need to have faith that our confessed sins are already forgiven due to the past work of Jesus, and not bring them to mind again. As explained in v17-18 "their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more... there is no longer an offering for sin." Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||