|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| I find it strange
that the Israelites so quickly thought ill of their brethren in this way, especially
immediately after the first 5 verses. The altar was obviously a large structure
that could be seen from a distance. Maybe it reminded them of the Tower of Babel
and they were afraid that the two and a half tribes had turned so quickly to idol
worship. Maybe there is a lesson for us too here. If we see our brethren behaving
in a way that we feel may not be acceptable, let us be sure to investigate its
motives fully before condemning it. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.11-12
The proverbs [18:13]
counsels He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and
shame unto him. A wise counsel which should have been understood and implemented
by the whole nation at this time. We can easily fall into the same way of thinking.
We may listen to one speaking of another an simply assume that the one speaking
is presenting a complete picture. Wrong judgement can flow from one who has no
intention of misrepresenting another. The error is simply a matter of not being
in possession of all the facts. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| In contrast to
the behaviour of the other tribes the two and a half tribes answer is so conciliatory
- 'A soft answer turneth away wrath' (Proverbs
15:1) We could learn a lot about how we should speak with each other from
this event. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| SUPPORT YOUR
BROTHERS. For more than five years the tribes of Rueben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh had led Israel into their land, clearing it of the Canaanites and settling their brothers in their own towns and villages. Rueben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh had already inherited their portion of land on the other side of the Jordan, yet they crossed over, supported, and led their brothers to victory as Israel conquered the land of Canaan. Joshua had good words of commendation for them when he said, "You have done all that Moses the servant of the LORD commanded, and you have obeyed me in everything I commanded. For a long time now - to this very day - you have not deserted your brothers but have carried out the mission the LORD your God gave you." Just think, for five years or more, while they could have been establishing their own lives, properties and business, these faithful people gave it all away to help their brothers establish theirs. They considered the needs of others more important than their own and they did not desert their brothers even when it must have seemed like the campaign would never end. Let's live like them. Let's not desert our brothers, but put their needs ahead of our own as we help each other into the promised land. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| :13
Does the fact that they sent to 'Phinehas' mean that Eleazar is now dead? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 22:31 And so Phinehas effects the true role of the priest. He becomes the intercessor, reconciling both sides to each other. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.5 Joshua continues the same exhortations that Moses delivered to the Children of Israel.; as they are now in the land Canaan. " Take heed" or attend to the commandments; "Love" the LORD thy God; "Walk " in His ways; "Keep" His commandments; "Cleave" or cling unto Him; "Serve" Him. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
The two and a half tribes had completed their job, and now that Israel was dwelling in the Promised Land, they were able to go back across the Jordan and occupy their inheritance. There’s a good lesson here for us: if they had been thoughtful enough to tell the rest of Israel about their plans to build an altar, then a very nasty moment could have been averted. We must be thoughtful, and consider each other. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.4 Reuben, Gad, (and presumably Manasseh) had requested land east of the River Jordan (Num 32). They had much cattle and this area was ideal to raise them. Moses agreed to that request dependent upon their armed participation to subdue Canaan for the other tribes. Moses likened non-participation to the reluctance of the ten spies to occupy the Land. Not helping their brethren would be as much of a sin as the discouragement of the ten spies which dissuaded Israel from entering the Land. Happily, the tribes agreed to help their brethren, who after several years of participation, could now return to their possessions east of the Jordan. The good of the whole body is greater than the good of the individual or individuals (1Cor 12:12-27). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
The fighting men of the tribes of Rueben, Gad, and Manasseh had shown themselves to be faithful, dedicated, and zealous men. For a long time they had been without their families in order that they might keep their promise of fighting alongside their brothers in displacing the people of Canaan. When the work was finally done, it wasn't they that came to Joshua, eagerly requesting that they be allowed to finish the work and go home to their families, but it was Joshua who came to them. This suggests that they were fully dedicated to continue the work until it was completely done. Having thus proven their dedication to God, and returning home, they set up an altar of witness, and incurred the wrath of the rest of Israel. Israel had assumed, wrongly, that they were defying the Lord and going against His commandments. Wouldn't you think that they would have trusted their brothers a little more than that? Wouldn't you think that they would have gone to their brothers and meekly enquired what they were doing rather than accusing them, and gathering all of Israel to war against them? (v12) When we see a brother or sister, or even an ecclesia, doing something we assume is against God's word; shouldn't we first go and obtain the facts before jumping to conclusions? Is it not worth looking at the "track record" of a party before assuming they are guilty? Sometimes our brother may do something which, though out of the ordinary, is still a justifiable act of worship, and until we ask them personally about it, we should assume that they are innocent until proven guilty, and not the other way round. If we are in doubt about this principle, then we have only to look at the way Jesus was treated by those around him. They often assumed he was doing wrong, but that was only because they didn't understand the ways of God as well as he did. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
22:33 The tribes I the land of Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
22:1-4 And so the two and half tribes whose inheritance was East of Jordan are now exonerated from their oat. They have fulfilled their promise and allowed to return to their inheritance even though, as the book of Judges shows, the land had not been completely subdued. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| STICKABILITY Conquering the land of Canaan was not a two minute job. If we take our time scale from the life of Caleb, we can see that from the time Israel entered the land, to the time that it was officially conquered, took a number of years. Caleb was 85 years old when he was given Hebron. He was 40 years old when he was sent out as a spy to search the land of Canaan. Following that period of spying, all of Israel spent 38 more years wandering around the wilderness. That means Caleb was 78 years old when he crossed the Jordan River with Israel, and had been in the land seven years until the time of his inheritance (see Joshua 14). It took seven years to conquer the land. The Reubenites, Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh had said they would go across the Jordan and help their brothers conquer the land. They had already inherited their land on the other side of the Jordan. These two and a half tribes fought for Israel faithfully for seven years. Seven years is a long slice of life to give up when you have just moved into a new neighbourhood. Joshua commended them, saying, "You have done all that Moses the Servant of the LORD commanded, and you have obeyed me in everything I commanded. For a long time now - to this very day - you have not deserted your brothers but have carried out the mission the LORD your God gave you." (Josh 22:2-3) Would we have had the stickability, faith and courage to do the same? Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| 22:33-34 This episode shows that piety and zeal for the honor and worship of God animated the people that entered Canaan to an extent far beyond what was exemplified in many other periods of the history of Israel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
22:31 So Phinehas was still high priest for some time into the time of the conquest of the land. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.1-3 The 40,000 men of Reuben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh had faithfully supported their brethren on the west side of the Jordan for seven years. Now it was time to go home with the wealth that they had accumulated. There is no evidence that these men ever visited home during their seven-year service. It is clear that the seriousness and willingness of Israel to serve Yahweh was evident at this time (vs.11,12,21,26,27). Later, that attitude would change as Israel intermingled with the pagan nations in the land. The danger for the follower of Christ is the same. Can the enthusiastic, newly baptized disciple of Jesus maintain his or her devotion as the trials and temptations of life unfold? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
23:5 Departure to the East of Jordan was not to be taken as an excuse for lax behaviour. Joshua commands the people to ‘Take diligent heed’ to the commandments. It would be so easy to see Jordan as a division beyond which one could do anything. Likewise we should not see distance from our brethren and sisters as an excuse for laxity. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.11 It appeared that Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh had committed a trespass against Yahweh by building an altar to worship false gods. V.12 The congregation of Israel immediately gathered to stop this affront to the true worship of Yahweh. V.31 Happily, the incident was resolved without any bloodshed when it was realized that no spiritual damage had been done. The congregation of Israel had no hesitation in reacting to a perceived fault that could affect the whole body. This serves as an example of how ecclesias should react to spiritual laxity in their bodies. The response should be swift, due enquiry should be made and firm action taken if necessary. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
Sharing the spoil Many of the Reubenites, Gadites and Manassites had stayed behind to look after the livestock and children. This must have included many men, possibly even some who were trained for war. The temptation would have been there for the men who "did all the work" of conquiring the land to keep all the spoil to themselves. Hence Joshua's specific command in v8 to share it with those who had stayed behind. These were not wages, but extras that God had given them. Do we share our extras with our brothers and sisters? The ecclesia is a body of many diverse roles; all of them necessary. Some of these are roles which do not attract much "spoil". Therefore it is up to those who have nice things to share them with others in a kind of spoil distribution. This might take the form of sharing our homes, gardens, swimming pool, dinner tables, holidays and assorted other "treats" that God has seen fit to provide. These things are extra over and above God's promise of "food and raiment" and so should be viewed as gifts to share if we possibly can. More often than not we will enjoy them more too. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
Josh 22:22 - "The Lord God of gods" is an unclear KJV English translation; "Lord" is from the Heb. "Yahweh" (3068) and it's the Jewish national name of God, in Exodus 3:14 (Exo 3:13-15) the NIV margin more accurately translates "I will be what I will be"; "God" is from the Heb. "El" (410) and indicates "mighty, strong, God"; "gods" is from the Heb. plural word "Elohim" (430) and means "gods in the ordinary sense, immortal angels, men appointed to do a divine duty, magistrates, judges"; so when we put together "The Lord God of gods" in this instance it should perhaps read something like "He who will be the strength of those who obey him" - this would seem to have an ultimate prophetic application to be fulfilled when Christ returns and the saints receive immortality. Josh 22:33 - "blessed God" - the Heb. word for "blessed" is "barak" (1288) and it means "to kneel, to bless God (as an act of adoration), to bless man (as a benefit), it can also indicate treason when insincere". Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
22:16 Notice the presumption – ‘what trespass ...’ not the best way to deal with a possible error. Far better to ask for an explanation. How often do we jump to conclusions and thus alienate our brethren. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.16
- This verse links Zion quite clearly to Christ - the foundation stone of this
spiritual city in fact on which we can be built - part of the temple. Peter makes
it quite clear that this stone has different effects on different people, and
we must be sure which way we grow. 1Pet.2:6-8.
See also Luke
20:17,18, Acts 4:11,12, Rom.9:33, 10:11, 1Cor 3:11, Eph.2:20. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.1
Woe to the crown of pride, to the drunkards of Ephraim in the midst
of a swath of woes against the nations around Israel must have come
as a shock to Israel. Amos - a contemporary prophet - slips warnings against Israel
and Judah [Amos
2:4 , 2:6] at the end of a list [Amos
1:3, 6, 9, 1:11, 1:13, 2:1] of judgements against the nations around Israel.
A striking warning against complacency which we should learn from. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.10
- I had always assumed that these well known words here were giving us a clue
as to the right way to be about God's word - a sort of drip-feed action, as it
were, but v.13
makes it clear that this is not the meaning. This was a situation where knowledge
had dropped so low that even the prophet spoke without real conviction - v.11.
Let us be sure to take this to heart. Service to God is not something that we
fit into little parts of of lives - into our spare time, as it were - it is the
core around which we fit in everything else. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 28:16
The foundation that the Lord was to lay in Zion was to replace the stumbling stone
that Ahaz had laid. He had arranged for a copy of an altar that he had seen in
Damascus to be put before the temple. (2
Kings 16:10) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :16
The foundation stone which the Lord would lay in Zion is to be contrasted with
the altar which Ahaz had made after the fashion of what he had seen in Damascus
(2
Kings 16:10). The stone of the Lord's provision would be a stumbling stone
to those involved in false worship. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 28:1 The mention that Ephraim are 'drunkards' does not necessarily mean that they were drunk with wine. Drunkenness causes the mind to be confused. This is the effect of wrong doctrine. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.16 Everything necessary for salvation has been provided for us. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Vs.1,7 Yahweh likens Israel (Ephraim), and more particularly its leaders, priests, and prophets to drunkards. This figure conveys the inability to make sound judgements, the result of which is a downfall (Psa 107:27; Prov 23:21; 26:9; Isa 24:20). Those who operate under this condition mock Yahweh (v.22; Prov 20:1). V.10 The fatuous advice they give will be answered by Yahweh in kind, to their detriment (v.13; Prov 26:5). V.16 Yahweh promises a cornerstone (Jesus) to be a sure foundation upon which shall be built a true and faithful house (spiritual Israel). V.17 Yahweh's judgement will sweep away their lies (notice the interplay of the word (measuring) line (Heb. kav) with the figure used in vs.10,13).Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| The first few verses refer to Ephraim, Israel in the north (Isa 28:1-4). Then the prophet looks to the south, and speaks of the glories of the kingdom which will be centred on Jerusalem. But repeatedly, he castigates the people for their godlessness: Isa 28:7,8 is a rebuke against the leaders because of their drinking habits; Isa 28:13-15 shows how the people refused to listen to God’s teaching. The joy and glory of Christ’s kingdom however shines through, and Isa 28:21 insists that “the Lord will rise up”. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
28:1-3 The destruction of Ephraim happened during the time of Isaiah when the Assyrians came and took Hoshea away. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.27 "the cartwheel" was two iron wheels armed with iron teeth, like a saw, joined together by a wooden axle. The "corn drag" was made of three or four wooden cylinders, once again armed with teeth, which would be attached on the underside, and joined like a sledge. Both were used to cut straw for fodder, as well as to separate the corn. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
28:1 Ephraim "whose glorious beauty is a fading flower" is an apt description of the nation who are about to be taken into captivity by the Assyrians when Hoshea’s kingdom was overthrown. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
28:12 In speaking of providing rest for the weary we see the work of Jesus – Matt 11:28 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Both Joel (835-796 BC) and Isaiah (740-680 BC) had similar prophetical outlooks. Joel castigated the drunken leaders of his time (Joel 1:5), just as Isaiah did in his time (vs.1,7). By describing four forms of locusts, Joel forecast four major troubling events for Israel and Judah (Joel 1:4). He was probably pointing forward to the invasions of Assyria, Babylon, the continuing captivity under Medo-Persia, and the destruction of Jerusalem by Rome. By comparison, Isaiah seems to point to three major events. In v.4 he uses the figure of fruit (actually figs) to demonstrate the succession of woes. Figs have three crops: the early-ripe figs (bikkurah) which come out mid to late June; followed by the summer figs (kermus) which come out in August; followed by the winter figs (pag) which are left to hang to thoroughly ripen on the trees, then to be picked in the spring. Perhaps Isaiah used these figures (no pun intended) to forecast the three major events concerning: Assyria, Babylon, and Rome. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
28:11 we know from 1Cor 14:21 that this verse is speaking of the work of the believers in the first century Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.10,13 The figure being used here is that of a builder constructing a structure. First he would set out his base course of stones according to the line he has put down. Then he would raise the line and set his second course of stones. He would continue this process until the building had been completed. As with a constructing building, a child is educated course by course, one set of instructions being applied on top of another until knowledge is complete. To begin with, a child starts off on milk and graduates to more and more solid food. The child of God follows the same pattern as the natural child. He needs to take spiritual milk before being able to take spiritual meat (v.9; Heb 5:12-14). The foundation stone (cornerstone) for Yahweh’s spiritual house was Jesus (v.16). Upon Him all the layers of stones (instruction) were based. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
28:9 ‘wonderful in counsel and excellent in doing’ slips off the tongue easily. However it embodies our God. Not only does he have wonderful judgement about doing things. He also ensures that wonderful counsel is implemented. So often we may have wonderful plans but we lack the ability to implement those things. Not so our God. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.2
tells us what this chapter is about. There follows example after example of
the way that the 'elders' showed their faith. Most of us, I'm sure, are very familiar
with this chapter, but as I read it today I was struck anew with the way in which
these people demonstrated their belief in God. Are we making an effort to be included
in a list like this? Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| This great chapter
of faithful men and women is a catalogue whose faith was manifest by their works
for they all did something as a consequence of their faith. Herein is the example
for us to follow. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:9
To those who are 'conciencious objectors' Abraham's attitude to the land of promise
is great help. We are not citizens of this world. So we do not see any of the
things it offers as our rights. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :19
We do well to accept that the faithful in the Old Testament times - men like Abraham
- actually did believe in the resurrection. Abraham did not have some shadowy
notion about what God would do. He was convinced enough that God would raise Isaac
from the dead that he was willing to slay him. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Heb 11:6. In this verse we have the key to Bible understanding. Without faith we can not please God. To come to God we must first believe that He is, that He exists, and that He is a rewarder of all that seek Him. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to John |
||||||||||
| 11:9 The record says that Abraham dwelt with both Isaac and Jacob in tents. How long were al three contemporary? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.5 There are some who suggest that this verse shows that people go to heaven at death. However, consider John 3:13 which states this is not possible. And so, what happened to Enoch? The Bible does not say definitively. The term should not see (look on) death could mean that he did not actually experience others' deaths. He lived 365 years which was far shorter than his contemporaries. Adam died before Enoch was translated (transported away). And so, perhaps, he did not see Adam's death. Did Enoch die? Yes, if scripture is adduced (v.13; Rom 5:14). The general principle, of course, is that all men are sinners (Rom 3:23) and, therefore, subject to death (Rom 6:23). To where was Enoch taken? We are not told, just as we are not told where Moses was buried (Deut 34:1-6) or where Elijah finally rested (2Kin 2:11,15-17). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| FINAL PERSPECTIVE One of the really encouraging things about Hebrews 11, is that the records of the lives that are mentioned only tells of the good things that these great people of faith did. However, if we decided to go back through the Bible and make a study of the individual lives that were mentioned, we would find that they all failed in some way - sometimes seriously; we would see quite clearly that they were just human and made mistakes just as we do. None of those weaknesses are mentioned in Hebrews 11. This is God's record of people of faith. The moments of their lives that are recorded are the times when they put all their trust in God, knowing that he would lead, deliver and reward them. Why do I find this so encouraging? Like the people of old, I often fail to live up to the standard that I should. I sin and need God's forgiveness. Hebrews 11 tells me that God has forgiven the sin of those who went before and that if I can walk by faith as they did, God will overlook my shortcomings too. Instead of remembering how I have failed, he will remember how I have lived for him. We all fail - God knows that. But once we are forgiven we must press on to live in faith for our God. May his memory be short for our sins and long for our faithfulness. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
V.4 We know very little about the world in which Enoch lived. The writer places Enoch's name in a genealogy, but refrains from writing historical details. Nevertheless, he singles out Enoch's characteristic; "Enoch walked with God". All the other persons mentioned in the genealogy (Gen 5:3-32) lack this discription. Only Enoch is known as a man of faith. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
|
Hebrews 11 is such a famous chapter; and it is quoted or read out so often; that I wonder whether we tend to think of it in isolation from the rest of Hebrews, rather than in context? Have you ever wondered, for example, why this chapter precedes chapter 12 which speaks of God's discipline to those He accepts as sons? What is it that links a list of people demonstrating faith, with a sermon on God's chastening? The answer, I believe, can be found in 12:28. We are inheriting a kingdom which cannot be shaken. Earthly habitations, like the house built on the sand, fall down once shaken by an earthquake, whereas heavenly ones don't. We are inheriting a heavenly habitation (12:22) which will stand up to any amount of shaking. What this is actually talking about is the trying of our faith. It is the trying of our faith (elsewhere described as the purging of Gold and Silver in fire) that strengthens and increases it. Gold is not consumed by fire, but is made purer, and the dross is taken away. Faith is not consumed by trial, but strengthened, whereas all else falls away. In Hebrews 11 we see continually the reference to the eternal habitation (10, 14, 16). This habitation is unseen, yet more real than the earthly one. We are being exhorted that we have to emulate the list of men and women shown here, who through faith in an unseen habitation went through trials in order to have that faith strengthened, and thereby strengthening their grasp on that heavenly home. It is only by faith that we will enter into the eternal habitation, and only by trial that we will develop faith. Thus the two chapters are closely linked. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
11:7 We know that Noah was a man of faith because God speaks of him as ‘righteous’ Gen 7:1 and we know that the only way a man can be righteous is through belief in what God has said Gen 15:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
11:20 Gen 48:14 uses the word ‘wittingly’ to describe Jacob’s actions. So we conclude that ‘wittingly’ in Genesis indicates that Jacob did what he did because he believed in the promises that God had made about the boys. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Heb 11:9 is a fascinating verse. It says that Abraham lived in a tent with Isaac and Jacob. Did he? Yes, he was 100 yrs old when Isaac was born (Gen 21:5), and Isaac was 60 when Jacob was born (Gen 25:20,26) making Abraham 160 yrs old. Abraham died at age 175 (Gen 25:7), so he did have 15 tears concurrent with his grandsons Esau and Jacob. He could have died after the birth of Isaac, but God was most merciful to him and let him see his son and grandsons grow up. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to David |
||||||||||
11:10 Abraham’s behaviour contrasted with those at Babel – which occurred a generation before Abraham. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
11:10 Abraham’s behaviour contrasted with those at Babel – which occurred a generation before Abraham. They wanted to build a city and make a name Gen 11:4 whereas Abraham was looking for God to do the building. Also it was God who gave Abram a name. Gen 17:5 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.3 God created all things and left evidence for both His existence and creativity (Rom 1:19,20). He is the starting point of all things. It takes more faith to believe in Evolution than creation. Evolution cannot claim any starting point. And so, how can science support Evolution when a basic scientific maxim says that: nothing comes from nothing. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
11:17-19 The way that the writer describes Abraham’s motivation when he was to offer Isaac shows that he knew for certain what God would do. His faith is even more amazing when we realise that he was anticipating a resurrection from the dead, not simply the deliverance of Isaac at that time. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.1 Faith is the substance (assurance) of things hoped for… It is impossible to hope for things if the things are not known. The hope being expressed here is that of eternal life in the Kingdom of God (1Thess 2:12;Titus 3:7). The only way to develop faith is to read the scriptures (Rom 10:17). And it is in the scriptures where we will find the reasons to hope (Rom 15:4). …the evidence of things not seen. In believing God’s Word we can be assured that what He promises will come true (Titus 1:2). Look at Abraham who believed God (Gen 15:6). His name is written in this chapter of faith (vs.8-10). Abraham, and the other faithful mentioned in this chapter, was convinced of the reality of God’s promises even though he died without seeing them (v.13). But when Jesus returns to earth to establish His kingdom, Abraham will be there (Matt 8:11). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
11:31 Rahab is truly an amazing woman. She would not even have been born when Israel left Egypt. The stories she heard about the exodus and the destruction of the Egyptian army must have been told her quite some years after the event – and she believed not only the stories but the implications that flowed from those stories. Namely that God would give Canaan into their hand. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||