July 21

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 2Samuel  6
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 2Samuel 6 online in the King James Version
Listen to 2Samuel 6 online in the New International Version

 

v. 8 - The more we learn about this man the more 'human' traits we find that we can relate to ourselves. Here David is angry with God. He could not see that what Uzzah did was worthy of death, and this caused him to be afraid of the Lord that day - frightened that God would bring retribution on him for his anger against Him, presumably, and frightened to continue in case something else happened. I find it comforting that this man of whom God thought so highly, could possess these aspects to his personality, and still be approved because of the state of his heart. There is only one other recorded incident of a man of God being angry with God, and that is with Jonah (4:1-9).
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.16 - The last time that we saw Michal associated with David she lowered him down from the window to save his life [1 Samuel 19:12] She did this because of her love for him. Now she 'despised him in her heart'. She had regressed spiritually apart from David. She had ideas of grandeur for David. Hence she was unhappy because he removed his kingly robes to don the 'linen ephod'.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.9 - This fear, which is borne of our own misunderstanding of God's ways which are higher than our ways, is familiar to all of us. I find it somewhat of a comfort that David had this problem too.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

The use of language from Deuteronomy 12

his place
Deuteronomy 12:11

Shows that David understood that God had actually chosen a specific place where he would place his name. It was this that drove David to bring the ark to Zion.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
DANCING FROM THE HEART
Michal was disgusted. David had been bringing the ark back into Jerusalem. They sacrificed a bull and a fattened calf every six steps, everyone was rejoicing - especially David, they sacrificed more offerings and David gave gifts of bread, dates and raisins to all the people. But that wasn't what disgusted Michal. It was the fact that David was only wearing a linen ephod and dancing with all his might before the LORD. David's reply to her was this. "It was before the LORD … who chose me … (that) I will celebrate before the LORD. I will become even more undignified than this and I will be humiliated in my own eyes. But by these slave girls you spoke of I will be held in honour."
David and Michal were looking at the same situation from two different points of view. David's actions were from the heart. What he did stemmed from his heartfelt worship and praise and fear of God. Michal was looking in from the outside. All she saw was her barely dressed husband making a fool of himself in front of the rest of the kingdom. David danced before the LORD. The general people seem to have seen David doing a good thing rather than disgracing himself. The lesson for us is to be like David and to act from a pure heart and not to worry about what people think. God knows what is in our hearts. David knew that.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Robert
:3 When David put the ark on 'a new cart' are we right in assuming that David did this out of ignorance of what the law of Moses stipulated?

If David had not known that the ark should be carried by the priests -which is unlikely - it is certain that the priests knew what the law required and they would doubtless have told David.

Can we think of a reason why David would do this in contradiction of the express teaching of the law of Moses?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
RIGHT THING, WRONG WAY

David's plan was a good and godly plan. David's life was lived in a good and godly way. He was described as a man after God's own heart. God was with David in everything he did, and God had blessed him. With so many positive things going for David, it is hard to see how he could go wrong.

David wanted to bring the ark of God up to Jerusalem - it was part of God's plan to have the temple and the ark at Jerusalem - but the way David did it was wrong. The Law of Moses specifically stated that the ark of the LORD must be carried by its poles, on the shoulders of the priests. Maybe David did not know this, or maybe he had forgotten this particular law, but whatever it was, he had the ark put on a new cart to move it, and when Uzzah reached out his hand and touched it, he was struck dead. David had done the right thing in the wrong way.

Can we be sure we are doing the right thing in the right way? Could it be that we have not read God's word for so long that we have forgotten the right way to serve him? Let's not make the same mistake as David. Even though we are doing the right thing, let's make sure we do it the right way.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Robert
6:9 David was afraid of the Lord because he did not expect what happened. This is because he realised that the Levitical priesthood was to be replaced with the Melchisedec priesthood - consequently he presumed that the requirements of the law of Moses were no longer applicable. This, I suggest, is why David pt the ark on a cart and was then surprised when Uzza was struck dead.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.3 Uzzah and Ahio the sons of Abinadab should have known better than to follow this method of carrying the ark, and indeed so should have David, for the Law of Moses prescribed plainly that the ark must travel on the shoulders of the priests. Num 7:9  What glory could there be to God if His explicit instructions were disregarded?
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
David cared more for God's approval than for his wife's.  She despised him, but God loved him.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

V.2 Baale of Judah is Kirjathjearim (Josh 15:9). It was to Kirjathjearim that the Philistines brought the ark (1Sam 6:21).  Kirjathjearim was nine miles north of Jerusalem.  The journey of the ark to Jerusalem began at the house of Abinadab at Gibeah

V.4 Gibeah, near Kirjathjearim, signified a hill.  From there it came to the threshing floor of Nachon.  Nachon is alternatively called Chidon (1Chron 13:9).  Then after the death of Uzzah, the ark resided at the house of Obededom the Gittite for three months

Vs.10,11 A Gittite is a resident of Gath.  However, there were several places in Israel which were known by the suffix Gath.  Obededom is believed to have come from Gath-Rimmon.  He was a Levite who is later mentioned as one of the temple gatekeepers (1Chron 26:1-4).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

At the foot of the mount Sinai God had strictly warned the people "do not go up to the mountain or touch its base" (Exo 19:12). God's holiness was such that He could not bear the idolatrous people of Israel to touch the mountain He was descending upon. Whilst talking to Moses on the mountain, He suddenly and urgently commanded Moses to go down again in order to stop them transgressing this commandment, saying "Away! Get down... do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to the LORD, lest He break out against them" (Exo 19:24).

The fire and darkness upon that mountain were designed to put fear into the hearts of those present so that they would not approach God without due reverence. The fact that one can approach God is evident by the fact that Moses, Joshua, and other elders of Israel climbed up the mountain unharmed. What all this means is that in order to come to God we must have a proper sense of fear. Again, in Lev 10:1-3 Aaron's sons were consumed with fire because they presumed to know how to approach God, but offered "strange fire" before Him.

In this incident with Uzzah we have exactly the same principle. Uzzah and his brother had kept the Ark for a long time in their father's house. They would have become accustomed to it, and maybe even started to think of it as their ark. Uzzah's action of reaching out to hold the Ark demonstrated a deep seated comfort he had with it, which may long ago have replaced his fear or reverence. It was right, then, in God's sight, that He should "break out" against him as He had promised He would do at the base of Sinai. God's presence was in the Ark just as it had been on that mountain. The lesson for us can be taken that "by those who come near to Me I must be regarded as Holy" (Lev 10:3). What a comfort it is, however, that we now have Christ as our mediator, so that we do not need to fear such outbreaks, but come instead with confidence and boldness before the LORD our Father in prayer (Heb 10:19-22, 12:18-24, 28-29).  Let us therefore  have grace by which we may serve God acceptably with reverence and Godly fear.


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Rob

6:11  We should not think that David had lost interest in bringing the ark to Zion. Rather the death of Uzza had such an effect on David that he took time to think about what to do next.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

V.3 David had allowed the ark to be carried on a cart.  This is how the Philistines transported it (1Sam 6:7-14).  The Philistines were ignorant of the ways of Yahweh and not subject to His covenant.  But David should have known that the only acceptable way, to Yahweh, of transporting the ark was manually by Levites (Deut 10:8). 

V.8 After the death of Uzzah, David became angry.  He was not angry with Yahweh but with himself.  His mistake, indirectly, cost the life of Uzzah, which greatly upset him. 

V.13 Notice that when the ark was finally moved into Jerusalem, David made sure that it was done so according to the Law.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

6:1  There are a number of echoes of the Philistines taking the ark in this chapter. The first is the 30,000 men that David chose which contrasts with the 30,000 that fell when the ark was taken – 1Sam 4:10


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
When we go to the thirieth Psalm it appears that not only Uzzah suffered from the wrath of God at the attempt to bring the ark up from Kirjathjearim. Wrath fell upon David himself, as the one ultimely responsible. He was struck down by an illness so severe that he expected to die (Psa 30:3). Yet in neither the account recorded in Samuel or in Chronicles is there any indication of David's affliction.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John
ACTIONS AND ATTITUDE
 
David did it with joy, he did it out of love for God, he did it with the right attitude, and he did the right thing. But David did it the wrong way. As David made his first attempt to bring the ark of God into Jerusalem, everything seemed right. There were no double standards, there were no idolatrous attitudes, and it was all done to show love for God and to put him first. But "Uzzah reached out and took hold of the ark of God, because the oxen stumbled. The LORD's anger burned against Uzzah because of his irreverent act; therefore God struck him down and he died there before the ark of God." (2Sam 6:6-7)
 
After a few months to examine the situation, David learnt that the ark of the LORD was to be carried by the priests - not to be put on a cart. So three months later, as they brought the ark of God into Jerusalem, carried by the priests with the same rejoicing and positive attitude (maybe a little more fearful and humble), God allowed the ark to arrive safely at it's resting place. David learnt that even with the right attitude, there is still a right way and a wrong way to do things.
 
God has not changed since the days of David. Let's make sure we get things right as we serve the LORD, both in the things that we do and in the attitude we show as we do them.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert

6:8     When David ‘blessed the people’ he was acting the part of the priest who was to bless the nation – Num 6:22-27


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

Vs.3,6,7,8 Uzzah means strength.  Uzzah was the son of Abinadab in whose house the ark rested for twenty years.  Abinadab was a Levite, therefore, Uzzah was also.  It was the Kohathite branch of the Levites that was responsible for transporting the holy things of the sanctuary (Num 4:15). 

However, if anything was touched, the person who touched it would die. That is just what happened to Uzzah.  As a Levite, he would have known the rules.  However, his knee-jerk reaction to save the ark from damage cost him his life.  Yahweh could not go against His Word.  But, Yahweh, who knows the heart, will have understood the motivation of Uzzah.  Will Yahweh be merciful to Uzzah and restore him to life at the last day?  


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

6:2 Even though David set about moving the ark in an inappropriate way we should notice that he actually went to Baale of Judah and supervised the moving of the ark. He was heavily involved in the work and not just a commander who gave instructions to others.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

V.3 This method of transportation violated the Law Num 7:9).

V.:5 See 1Chron 13:8.

V.13 See 1Chron 15:26.

V.14 David had stripped from his royal clothing and heartily danced (1Chron 15:27).

Vs.15,20 Michal saw, in her mind, the king behaving in an undignified way. The king had disrobed from his royal vesture and was gyrating about in the sight of his subjects. His movements would have been slow, in keeping with the solemn music which would have been played for this occasion.

V.23 By dancing, David was praising Yahweh, from the heart, for His blessing of kingship.  But, Michal was more interested in monarchical ritual than in praising the one who granted the post.  It was a case of flesh versus the spirit between Michal and David.  Michal’s royal snobbery cost her motherhood, as Yahweh was not pleased with her attitude.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

6:4  The mention of Abinnadab’s house reminds us that in 1Sam 7:1 the ark was taken to his house when it was returned by the Philistines.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

 6:4 The mention of Abinnadab’s house reminds us that in 1Sam 7:1 the ark was taken to his house when it was returned by the Philistines.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
2Sam 6:13-17,20-22 - V.13 we have sacrifices every six steps and the number "six" is often viewed as the number of man so perhaps we have an echo of a man (Jesus) who would be sacrificed; the "ark" [Heb. "aron" (717) means "chest, ark, coffin" and comes from (727) which means "gathering or pluck" and thus it is suggested the ark should in some aspect be understood in the sense of "gathering" or "plucking"] has a connection to Jesus' sacrifice "And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me" John 12:26-33,36); V.14 -17, 20-22  the abreviated clothing of a  linen ephod was technically speaking a priestly garment and Barbara Bowen has been quoted offering these comments, "At the head of a great procession there would frequently be seen a half naked buffoon dancing, going through gesticulations usual on such occasions. It was all done in honor of the person to whom the procession was made, and was the office of a slave only” - David was dancing as a slave to serve/glorify/honor God versus acting as a slave to sin and shameful conduct.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
2Sam 6:6-7;Hos 4:6;Rom 10:2 - when we try to achieve desired ends our way, not God's way, there are consequences
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Jeremiah 11
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Jeremiah 11 online in the King James Version
Listen to Jeremiah 11 online in the New International Version

 

v. 19 - Whilst this verse is quite clearly prophetic of the time of the crucifixion of Christ, it is also something which was personal to Jeremiah, who shared this rejection - ch.18:18, see also Ps.35:15.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter

Jeremiah draws Israel's attention to the covenant that their parents had agreed to just before they entered the land.
Quotations and allusions to Deuteronomy

Out of the land of Egypt the iron furnace Jer.11:4/Deuteronomy 4:20
said so be it [amen] Jer.11:5/Deuteronomy 27:15 etc:
and do them Jer.11:6/Deuteronomy 27:26
imagination Jer.11:8/Deuteronomy 29:19
which I commanded Jer.11:8/Deuteronomy 27:1
to hear Jer.11:10/Deuteronomy 27:9
to escape [Heb to go forth] Jer.11:11/Deuteronomy 28:19
they shall cry ... not hearken unto them Jer11:11/Leviticus 26:31

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.4 - Egypt is referred to on three occasions as an iron furnace - here, Deut.4:20, 1Kings 8:51. Consider also these two verses in Ezekiel as well int his context, where the same two hebrew words occur in close proximity: Eze.22:18,20
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
11:5 In using 'amen' - so be it - Jeremiah is forcefully reminding Israel how they agreed to the words of the covenant by assenting 'amen' after each clause (Leviticus 27:15). The lesson for us is clear. We should be aware of the commitments that we have made.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:14 This is the second of three times (7:16 here 14:11) when God tells Jeremiah not to pray for the people. So Jeremiah has been speaking God's words of judgement against a sinful people - and so he prayed for their deliverance - even when he had been told to stop! How do we feel about those in the world who are in darkness?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
11:19 Against the background of the evil of the inhabitants of Jerusalem Jeremiah feels an outcast and laments in language which is strikingly like the prophecies of Isaiah about Messiah (Isa 53:7-8)
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.13 "shameful thing" or "shame" namely, the idol, not merely shameful, but the essence of all that is shamful.(Jer 3:24  Hos 9:10 ) which will bring shame and confusion on oneself. 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

V.21 If Jeremiah had not uttered his prediction, they would not have plotted against him. None were more bitter than his own fellow townsmen. We can see a similiar situation when we compare the conduct of the Nazarites towards Jesus. Luke 4:24-29 


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

 

V.14 It was the role of the priest to pray for the people. Yahweh told Jeremiah not to pray for the people.  Yahweh was recognizing Jeremiah as a priest.  Indeed, it seems that Jeremiah came from a priestly line (Jer 1:1).  This line probably extended from Abiathar, who Solomon sent to Anathoth (1Kin 2:26,27).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael
God says that because of Judah’s sin He will actually close His ears when His people cry to Him.  They have gone so far away, that He will not help them (Jer 11:11,14). For the loving Lord God, Who had called Israel to be His own people, to say such a thing, really illustrates how far they had gone from Him.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

11:15  In reproving those who rejoice to do evil Jeremiah is quoting Prov 2:14


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

Vs.21-23 The people from Jeremiah's home town, Anathoth, sought to kill him.  However, Yahweh promised to dispatch these would-be killersThe year of their visitation (punishment) (KJV) came when the Babylonians overran Anathoth. 

However, Yahweh saw beyond the exile and instructed Jeremiah to buy some land in Anathoth (Jer 32:6-15).  He was signalling a time of restoration for the city. This is borne out by Nehemiah's record of returnees (Neh 7:27; 11:32).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

11:8 The ‘covenant’ that the prophet is speaking of is not the one Israel entered into at Sinai. Rather it is the covenant of obedience recorded in Deut 27 - 29


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

11:7 ‘rising early’ is not saying that the prophet got up early every morning. Rather it is speaking of an attitude of mind which sought to do the things of God immediately. Such an example is seen in Abraham when he went to offer Isaac – Gen 22:3


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

11:4 ‘from the iron furnace (of Egypt)’ is one of the many quotations in Jeremiah from Deuteronomy – this is from Deut 4:20


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.3,4 The Law was a curse if it were not complied with fully (Deut 27:26; Gal 3:10).  If just one of the 613 tenets of the Law was missed, the whole law was considered abandoned (James 2:10).

V.9 The rebellion against Yahweh was not from an isolated source, but from a deliberate, concerted effort to disobey. It was the band of unsanctioned prophets who were at the core of this opposition to Yahweh (Eze 22:25).  Perhaps, we can better appreciate the witness of Jeremiah amidst this dedicated group of false prophets. If these prophets had come together against Yahweh, then they would have surely been hostile to His servant, the only true prophet (Psa 83:5).

V.13 It was not just that there was idolatry in Judah and Jerusalem, but the sheer proliferation of it that was horrendous. The increase of the shame of Judah and Jerusalem was directly proportional to the increase of idolatrous sites.

V.16 As long as Yahweh’s people were attached to Him, they were green (fertile) and would bear good fruit (Psa 52:8). Once they left the nurture of Yahweh, they would shrivel up, be useless, and therefore thrown out to be burned. In this case, it would be the Babylonians who would burn the useless cast-out branches.

The New Testament follows the same theme. John Baptist reminds the Jews to be fertile (Luke 3:8,9).  And, Jesus exhorts His followers to be attached to Him and bear fruit, otherwise they will be cast away and destroyed (John 15:4-6).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

How would you feel if the leaders of your Church were to be discovered plotting your death? What if the reason they wanted to kill you was simply because you spoke the truth about God, and they preferred lies? And what if these men and women were your own family? (Jer 11:18-23; 12:1-2, 6; 1:1)


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

11:3 Josiah was shown a copy of the law which was found in the temple during the reform he instituted – 2Kin 23:24. From the way in which Jeremiah makes repeated use of the quotation from the blessings and cursings of Deut 27 and 28 we might conclude that this was the part of the law of Moses that was found.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Matthew  22
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Matthew 22 online in the King James Version
Listen to Matthew 22 online in the New International Version

 

v. 5 - Notice that the servants, in making their excuses about attending the wedding (of Christ and the bride) actually state the nature of their idolatry. His farm ... his merchandise. We must be careful that we do not love the things of this life so much that when we are called to that wedding, we do not make light of it and return to the things in which we have become accustomed to put our trust. Gen.19:14, 25:3, Matt.13:22, Acts 24:25.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.19 - Jesus asks them to 'show me the tribute money' and the record says 'they' brought it. The Pharisees were so antagonistic to the Roman state they would not be carrying the tribute money. The Herodians were so willing to bow to Rome that they would be the ones who produced the money. But think about it. Rampant patriots of Rome working together with vigorous opponents to the Roman occupation.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
22:12-15 The parable - spoken against the leaders - left them speechless as the man in the parable. So they sought to trap Jesus in his own words! See the way of the flesh. Because they had no answer, rather than acknowledge that Jesus was a teacher sent from God they sought to undermine his teaching by trapping him in his teaching.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:31 In saying that at the bush God spoke ' unto you' we see a most powerful testimony that even though in the first instance Scripture was written or spoken many years ago it has a lasting and all embracing relevance. The same point is taught in Romans 4:23-24.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
In 21v43 Jesus told the Jews how the vineyard was to be taken away and given to "another nation bearing the fruits of it". Here in the parable of the wedding feast he reinforces what he has just said, in the hope of gaining their repentance. V3-4, the sending of the servants relates to the prophecy of Jeremiah in 7v13 "but you did not listen". Jer 7v15 "and I will cast you out of my sight" relates to the parable v7, and Jesus' own words in Matt 23v37. This should have been such a clear warning to the scribes and Pharisees, if they had known their old testament. But instead of repenting, they were angry with Jesus and plotted against him v15. Is it possible for us also to be this blind?
Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Rob
22:42 Whilst Jesus was under attack all day he did not simply defend himself. When he had silenced his critics he appeals to them with a question from Scripture.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.7  "burned up their city" Jerusalem, once "the city of the Great King" Psa 48:2, and even up almost to this time Matt 5:35; but now it is "their city"  just as the Lord, a day or two after this , said of the temple, "Behold your house is left unto you desolate" Matt 23:38  
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
V.36-40 - this second greatest commandment begs the question, who is our neighbor? In Luke 10:36 Jesus answers the question. Race and distance has nothing to do with who is our neighbor.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Charles

22:7 Notice it is 'their' city that is burnt up. In Matt 23:38it is 'your’ city that will be desolate. Even though Jerusalem had been 'the city of the great king' (Psa 48:2) God now no longer viewed it as His city.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

Vs.2-7 Jesus came, initially, to save His people Israel (Matt 15:24).  However, the Jews rejected Jesus' invitation to join Him in His marriage feast.  They would be punished and their city burned (Jerusalem 70 AD). 

Vs.9,10 And so, Jesus opened His invitation to the Gentiles (Acts 13:46).  They would be gathered from all over.  As guests to the wedding they would have been given a wedding garment.  It was up to them to put it on. 

Vs.11-13 One person, who was invited, decided not to put his garment on and was unfit to remain at the marriage feast.  He was promptly ejected

We all have an invitation to attend Jesus' marriage feast (eternal life).  But we must put on the acceptable clothing (covering).  That garment is Jesus (Gal 3:27).  To ensure that we are properly dressed at all times, we must check to make sure not to soil our garment (Jude 1:23). 

When the king comes in, He will inspect His guests (judgement).  Only those who are wearing the correct garment, which has been kept clean (Rev 3:4), will be allowed to stay.  All others will be ejected.  Out of the many who have received a wedding invitation, some will fail to put on the wedding garment; others will put it on but fail to keep it clean.  After inspection, only a comparative few will be allowed to stay (Matt 22:14).  Let's make sure of where we stand (2Pet 1:10).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

22:14 ‘For many are called but few are chosen’ returns to the point that Jesus already made – Matt 20:16. So whilst this parable had been directed against the Jewish leaders Jesus had his disciples in mind as well for that is whom he was speaking to in chapter 20.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

22:16-18          The whole event was designed to trap Jesus in his words. They asked a question which they had worked out would trap him whatever answer he gave. Do we ever ask our brethren and sisters questions in order to trap them?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

22:23‘The same day’ reminds us that we are still in the day which started in Matt 21:20. This is the longest day recorded in the ministry of Jesus as it does not end until Matt 25:46


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.16,17 The Herodians were members of the Jewish aristocracy who followed the principles of Herod Antipas.  This group supported the Roman government.  Their question Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not? was designed to trap Jesus into revealing Himself as seditious against Rome.  He did not fall for their ruse but showed that by obeying the laws of the land one was serving Yahweh (see Titus 3:1).

V.23 The Sadducees were the Jewish noble class.  These aristocrats were the richest and most powerful Jewish sect, and held most of the seats in the Great council (Sanhedrin).  From this elite group came Joseph of Arimathaea (Matt 27:57-59).  In throwing his lot in with Jesus, Joseph would have been ousted from his position of wealth and power (Matt 19:29).

The Sadducees differed with the Pharisees over the question of resurrection. It was this point that the apostle Paul exploited in his defence (Acts 23:6,8).

The Sadducees and Pharisees did not particularly like each other and differed on many doctrinal points. Each group thought that they were the true leaders of Israel.  

A prominent Pharisee, Nicodemus, broke with his party and supported Christ.  He would have given up much to follow Jesus. It was Nicodemus who accompanied Joseph of Arimathaea to Jesus’ tomb (John 19:38,39). Although the Sadducees and Pharisees never got on, ironically, it was the fact that two notable members from each party became untied in Christ. They were prepared to become poor and despised to gain the riches in Christ.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

22:23 The Sadducees use of the word ‘master’ is not in any way a recognition of Jesus’ status. Rather they ascribe to him that status so they can show, they thought, that he did not have the credentials of being a teacher.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

In v41-46 the Pharisees gather together to trip Jesus up. We should be in no doubt that Jesus' life was in danger here, because the reason for these questions was to "entangle him" (v15). So they, being enemies of Jesus, should have feared when he quoted Psalm 110 to them. By looking at the Psalm, can you see why?


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob