July 22

AUDIO
Thanks to the kind hard work of a site user, we are able to offer you a new 'one click' system
The link below will open in a new window, and provide the text and the audio.
This is in 'beta' form and we would welcome constructive comments
To make the audio play, click the arrow button to the top left of the text. The bar will show you the progress.
This requires the Flash player to be present on your computer

Today's readings from the WEB version

Make a Contribution

Choose Bible Version for this page - Currently KJV
King James Version  New International Version  English Standard Version  Revised Standard Version  New American Standard Bible  Youngs Literal Translation

All comments made on this site are the thoughts of the authors who are all Christadelphians but could sometimes make points which may not be agreed by all. Please reply to authors directly using the link at the end of the comment.

Further notes can be found here

Order by Author

Reading 1 - 2Samuel  7
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to 2Samuel 7 online in the King James Version
Listen to 2Samuel 7 online in the New International Version

 

v. 1 - The beginning of this chapter in David's life where he is denied permission to build God a house, but at the same time has a series of wonderful promises made to him, showing him that he was part of the royal line that would one day lead to Christ the Messiah, sets the scene. We read over it because the rest of the chapter seems so much more important, but what a relief this must have been for David. The life he had was so full of worry and danger and fear, that this must have been a wonderful time for him - to be at peace. The spiritual implications go a long way too as well of course. The same had been applied to Israel earlier - [Joshua 21:44] - and the same will apply to us at times in our lives of chastening - [Heb.4:1-11].
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.2-5 - Isn't it interesting that Nathan feels able to respond positively to David's desire without asking God? Clearly he knew that there was to be a house for God. Maybe he knew about David and Samuel's arrangements [1 Chronicles 9:22]. However he did not know that David was not to be the builder.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.18-29 - Notice how David's prayer focuses almost entirely on the praise of God. This is an example we do well to take very much to heart.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter

This list of some of the language of this chapter used elsewhere shows that Solomon saw himself as a fulfilment of the promise and the quotations from Deuteronomy 12 show that David understood, as mentioned when commenting about Chapter 6., saw from Deuteronomy 12 that Jerusalem was the place where the ark was to be placed.

had given him rest from all his enemies
Deuteronomy 12:10
2 Samuel 22:1
since the time that I brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt
1 Kings 8:16
I took thee
1 Kings 8:16
I will appoint
Deuteronomy 12:11

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Whereas we see the promises to David as wonderful - which indeed they are - they were a 'second best' - or could have been seen as such - for David. His desire, which had been in his heart from the time he was a teenager in Bethlehem, was to build a temple and now all he gets are some promises. A lesser man would have been dissatisfied. Not David. He sees in the promises a far greater house than even a temple in Jerusalem. Consider Psalm 127 where the house being built be God and the blessing of children are linked.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
7:23 The idea that god would 'make him a name' is quoted by Isaiah (63:14) where the prophet is speaking of the kingdom age. So these words to David will have their fulfilment in the kingdom. This is consistent with the promises to David in this chapter which has it's complete fulfilment in the kingdom.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.22 The angel Gabriel was to make allusion to these very words in his message to Mary about her Messiah-Son. In the course of several direct quotations of the promise to David, he added also, "He shall be great"  Luke 1:32, thus indicating a divine status for this Son of David 
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John
Even prophets of God made mistakes when they spoke from their own perspective.  Nathan should have asked for God's view, before he gave God's approval for David's plan (2Sam 7:3). We should learn from this, too
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to David

 

V.5 David wanted to build a physical house for Yahweh, but He questioned whether David was the one to do it

Vs.12,13 As we know, Solomon was charged with the responsibility of building the temple.  However, Solomon was not the described son of promise.  Solomon ascended to the throne while David was still alive, and so this prophesy could not apply to him. 

Also, Solomon's throne did not last forever, and he sinned greatly, particularly by degenerating into idolatry, thus making him unfit in Yahweh's eyes.  We know that the throne was no more after Zedekiah (Eze 21:26,27). 

V.16 The throne will only be re-established by the son of promise who will re-establish David's throne forever. Scripture clearly identifies this future king as Jesus who will take possession of the throne when he returns to the earth (Isa 9:6,7; Luke 1:31-33). 

Understanding the future Kingdom of God on earth is a pivotal part of understanding the Gospel.  Believing in the sacrifice of Jesus and its redemptive significance is not sufficient.  Both parts are necessary for the true believer to understand.  This is what the apostles taught (Acts 8:12).  


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

7:1  In quoting Deut 12:10  indicating that the Lord had given David rest Scripture is telling us that the time to build the temple was near. It is probable that it was that statement which prompted David, at that time, to speak to Nathan about building the temple.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

7:27 ‘revealed’ is ‘opened the ear’ – forming the basis for David’s comment in Psa 40:6


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter
When we consider this promise we see that there are two ways it could be interpreted. The kingdom would never be overthrown, being ruled by a dynasty for ever, or there is to be one seed of David who will sit on the throne through his immortal kingship. The phrase "before thee" (V.16) clearly indicates that David will be there to to witness the reign. David would have been aware of exactly what was meant. He therefore looked forward to the day of resurrection.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to John
WHO'S COMFORTABLE?
 
David looked around him and saw his flash palace and all the comforts he was surrounded with. He also saw the ark of God and the place where the LORD was worshipped - a tent.
 
For a spiritual man like David, the realisation that he was living in all the comfort he had provided for himself, while the ark of God was housed in a tent, must have come as a bit of a shock to someone who loved the LORD as much as David did. David said as much to Nathan the prophet. "Here I am, living in a palace of cedar, while the ark of God remains in a tent." (2Sam 7:1)
 
David then proposed to build a house for the ark of God - a temple where God could be worshipped. It turned out in the end that God did not want David to build him a temple, but that he had planned for David's son Solomon to build it.
 
The important thing to note is David's attitude. He realised that he had been serving himself more than he had been serving God in this area of his life, and he wanted to make it right.
 
Years later, Haggai had to tell his people to get their priorities right in the same way. He said, "Is this a time for you yourselves to be living in your paneled houses, while this house (God's temple) remains a ruin?" (Hag 1:3)
 
Let's have the attitude of David who wanted to do the right thing. Like David, let's acknowledge the areas of our lives in which we serve ourselves more than God, and make the changes we need to make for the better.

Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Robert

7:10    In telling David ‘I will appoint a place’ God is reminding David of what had been said in the wilderness – Deut 12:11 – that God would select a place where his name would be placed. At this point in time, even though it appears that David had worked out that place was to be Jerusalem God had not actually shown the place – this he did when the sword of the angel was stayed over the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.5 David was not allowed to build the temple. That is because he was a man of war, and one who had shed blood (1Chron 28:3). Solomon, whose name means peace, was the one who would build the temple. The temple represented a sanctuary of peace where Yahweh dwelled.

The physical temple pointed forward to Jesus as the spiritual temple (John 2:19-21). Jesus, the Prince of Peace, had shed no blood, and was, therefore, qualified to build the spiritual temple of Yahweh (Isa 9:6). The followers of Jesus are part of Him and, therefore, are part of that temple (1Cor 3:16).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

7:18 When David went and ‘sat before the Lord’ we can assume that the place where he went and sat was in the tent that he had pitched where he had placed the ark of the covenant.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter
The throne of David will be established forever and his offspring Jesus will be the ruler when he returns to rule over the earth - 2Sam 7:12-13,16,25-26;1Kin 11:36;1Chron 17:11-14,23-27;2Chron 21:7;Psa 89:3-4,26,27,36;132:10-13;Isa 9:7;2:2-4;Matt 6:10;5:5;19:28;25:31-34;Luke 1:32-33;Acts 2:29-30;13:23;Rom 1:3;2Tim 2:8;Heb 1:5,8,9,13;Psa 110:1;Rev 22:1,3,12,16,20.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

 

V.2 This is the first time that we are introduced to the prophet Nathan. Nathan means gift, or given (by God).  He plays an important role in the reigns of David and Solomon.  The understanding of the temple, on how it is to be set up, and by whom, is one of Nathan’s responsibilities.  Other main responsibilities of Nathan included the rebuke of David in his affair with Bathsheba, and Solomon’s education.

Nathan is accredited with writing a book (1Chron 29:29). This work is unknown outside its mention in the Books of Samuel.  Perhaps, this is a lost work.

V.29 The blessings of Yahweh’s house will be continued in the kingdom period.  A fourth temple will be built, the details of which are outlined in Ezekiel Ch.41. This physical temple will be used by the mortal population for worship.  There are many similarities to Solomon’s temple, but many differences also. The ways of Yahweh and His Christ will be taught to the earthly population in their preparation for judgment at the end of the kingdom period (Rev 20:12-15). 

All surviving nations from the wars, which shall precede peace in the Kingdom, will be commanded to come to Jerusalem to worship (Zech 14:6,7). The physical temple will be open for worship throughout the whole day and night for those nations to worship (Rev 21:24,25).  

It will be the responsibility of the Redeemed (the immortalized brothers and sisters of Jesus accepted, by Him, at the first judgment) to teach the mortal population of divine ways.  This is because the divine multitudinous assembly consisting of the Yahweh, His Son and the Redeemed will be at the core of the temple (Rev 21:22).  And, we have been promised that we would become a kingdom of priests (Rev 5:10).

In developing our vision of the kingdom, we should keep our future duties in mind.  Why do we want to be in the Kingdom anyway?  Do we seek eternal life, and if so, for what purpose? Surely, if we are trying to worship Yahweh as best we can in this life, then we would want to continue worshipping Him in perfect understanding  and without the interference of the flesh in the Kingdom (1Cor 13:12; 15:52-54). 

Today, we try to teach a largely hostile population the Truth.  In the kingdom, it will be our divine duty and pleasure to teach the whole, attentive world the Truth.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael
2Sam 7:14;Heb 1:5.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Charles

v12-16: First Principles>Sure Mercies of David>King
One of the conditions for there to be a kingdom is that there has to be a king. Although David was a king, these verses show that Jesus will be king, and this will last for ever. Zech 6:12-13, Matt 5:35
1. David is to have a descendant 1Chron 17:11-12, 2Sam 7:12, Luke 18:38, Rom 1:3-4, Rom 1:3-4
2. The Descendant is called the Branch Isa 11:1-4, Jer 23:5-6, Jer 33:14-15, Zech 6:12-13
3. The Descendant will reign on David's throne 1Chron 17:11-14, Psa 89:36
4. The Descendant will reign on David's throne for ever 2Chron 21:7, Jer 33:17
5. This Descendant is the Son of God 1Chron 17:13, Mark 10:47-48, Luke 1:31-33, John 7:42, 2Tim 2:8, Rev 22:16
6. This is an everlasting covenant sworn to David, and it did not take place in David's lifetime 2Sam 23:3-5 but there will be a future fulfilment Psa 89:3-4. Psa 132:11 is quoted in the New Testament and applied to Jesus Acts 2:30, Acts 13:22-23. This shows that Jesus will be the future King.

David's descendant is Rev 22:16 Jesus' testimony
David's descendant is a Saviour and a King Acts 13:22-23
Jesus will be king Acts 17:31
Jesus will reign from mount Zion Mic 4:7, Psa 2:6
The Kingdoms will become those of Christ Rev 11:15
The two covenants - Abraham and David Matt 1:1

For more about First Principles>Sure Mercies of David, go to Isa 55:3.


Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Roger

7:12-17This account of the promise has as its prime focus Solomon with Messiah in the distance whereas the account of this promise in 1 Chronicle 17:11-15 has Messiah as its prime focus and Solomon as the short term fulfillment as can be seen from the differences between the two accounts

2 Samuel 7

language

Language

1 Chronicles 17

11

make <06213>

build <01129>

10

12

fulfilled

be expired

:11

:12

proceed out of thy bowels

be of thy sons

11

14

If he commit … men

(no equivalent)

 

16

thine thy thy

My mine his

14

Notice the Samuel account uses language which speaks of short term whereas Chronicles is more general. Also Chronicles does not mention committing iniquity. Samuel has ‘thy house’ speaking to David whereas Chronicles has God speaking of ‘my’ house.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
2Sam 7:12 - if Heli (Luke 3:31) was the father of Mary it would appear Christ was at least partially descended from David's son Nathan as we don't know Mary's mother's lineage.
Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Charles
Reading 2 - Jeremiah 12
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
 
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
Listen to Jeremiah 12 online in the King James Version
Listen to Jeremiah 12 online in the New International Version

 

v. 1 - It is clear that the way of the wicked prospers. Those around us are able to have wealth and comfort that we do not share, and as all things are from God, this must be His judgement on them. We need to recognise as Jeremiah did in v.3, that our trials are there because God cares fro us, where he does not care for the wicked. What they have is for this life only and is fleeting and transient, but what we have is for ever. ch.11:20, Gen.18:25, Deut.32:4, Ps.119:75.
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.16 - The concept of diligence observance is seen in a number of parts of Scripture [Exodus 15:26 Deuteronomy 11:13 22 28:1 Jeremiah 12:16 17:24 Zechariah 6:15] and marks the requirement to give detailed attention to the things of God, not just skip over them. How does this apply to our daily reading of Scripture?
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v. 3 - Let us remember that if we plead with Him (v.1), we are also known of Him. The greatest honour of all is that we might be known of God. We should remember that. Consider 1John 3:20-21
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
12:13 The sowing of wheat and reaping thorns is taken up by Jesus (Luke 8:14) in the parable of the sower. So we understand that the coming up of the tares / thorns is not a chance happening. It is a conscious choice made by those who get involved with the things of the world.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
:10 The 'pastors' who have destroyed the vineyard - which is Israel are the religious leader. We know that the fact that Israel did not wholly follow their God meant that He turned to the gentiles. This is seen in the way that 'after that I will return' is quoted (Acts 15:16) by James along with the quotation from Amos 9 to justify the preaching to the gentiles.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter

12 This chapter breaks into two parts. 

:1-13 Jeremiah laments his situation.

:14-17 God responds to Jeremiah's complaint.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.5  "swelling of Jordan"  In harvest time and earlier (April and May) it overflows its banks (Josh 3:15), and fills the valley called the Ghor. "the pride of Jordan", its wooded banks abounding in lions and other wild beasts.Jer 49:19, Jer 50:44, Zech 11:3
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

Yesterday’s reading reminded us how far Judah had gone from God.  Today He tells them that He has left them (Jer 12:7-9). Dreadful words.  But at the end of the chapter there is hope. The Lord will scatter them, but in the end re-gather them (Jer 12:14-17). He really is a merciful Lord God.

 


David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to David

12:15  A glimmer of hope is presented amidst gloom and doom. There will come a time, says the prophet, when God will breather the Jews in His compassion.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

12:1-4 The way in which Jeremiah laments the way things seem to be going in the land highlights at least two things.

1 Jeremiah was troubled by the fact that even though he was speaking truth he was still suffering whereas the wicked seemed to prosper.

2 Jeremiah had a concern for the people that he was sent to witness to.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

12:3 The New Testament – James 5:5 – uses language from this verse to warn brethren and sisters about the consequences of their decadent lives.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.7 Yahweh dearly loved His people, and yet He was willing to punish them to teach them a lesson.  He always had restoration in mind, though, after the lesson had been learned.  There is a lesson here for us as ecclesias and as parents, that tough love is better for our members or for our children than is indulgence.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

 

Vs.1-4 The wicked do seem to prosper.  Yahweh makes them prosper, but they pay Him no attention. Jeremiah claims that he has been devoted to Yahweh, and urges The Almighty to punish the wicked, like sheep for slaughter (James 5:5). The prophet asks how long would this wickedness last.

V.5 Yahweh asks Jeremiah that if he can hardly deal with the smaller things (footmen), then how will he keep up with the larger challenges (horses)? This is not to mention the great uncontrollable outbursts of pride and wickedness like the swelling of the Jordan (KJV). 

The River Jordan burst its banks twice a year. The river covered the woods which, at that time, concealed lions and other dangerous animals.  The traveller could become confused with the new parameters of the swollen river and run smack into these wild animals.  Hence, is described the most dangerous condition of all for Jeremiah in his witness for Yahweh’s truth.

Incidentally, the ESV translates the swelling of the Jordan (KJV) as the thicket of the Jordan to better reflect the reality of the dangers of the wild animals (Jeremiah's greatest challenges).

V.6 Jeremiah cannot rely on anyone but Yahweh.  All others will betray him, and will rail on him (See Prov 26:5; Isa 31:4).

Vs.7-13 Yahweh’s people have dealt treacherously with Him and have betrayed Him.  Thus, Yahweh has turned them over to the oppressor for correction (Lam 1:7).

Vs.14,15  But, Yahweh will always redeem His people by saving a remnant of them.  He has always done this, and He will do so again in the end times (Psa 107:1-3).


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

In the previous chapter Jeremiah learns of the plot to kill him (11:18-19). Most painfully for Jeremiah, they are his own family and amazingly, his fellow priests of God (compare 1:1, and 11:21, 12:6). Thus in v1 Jeremiah is perplexed and discusses the problem with God. How can these seemingly righteous people be so happy plotting treachery and wickedness? How can they quote scripture so well, and give such uplifting sermons when Your ways are not in their hearts? (v2). Such is Jeremiah's disgust with these perverse members of his family, that in his prayer he requests their doom, which God grants (v3 and 11:21-23).

But God's reply is interesting. "If you have run with footmen and been wearied, how can you contend with horses?" (v5). In other words: "Now you feel but a little of what I feel" (v7-13).


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Rob

12:3 Jeremiah, frustrated with the people he has to speak to, desires God to intervene and judge them. That is what he is asking for when he speaks of ‘the day of slaughter’.


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter
Reading 3 - Matthew  23
Contribute a Comment for this Reading 
   
Audio (KJV)
Audio (NIV)
  Read Online (KJV)
View all Comments for this Reading
Listen to Matthew 23 online in the King James Version
Listen to Matthew 23 online in the New International Version

 

v.1-12 - These verses give us a great exhortation not to be proud in our own strength, as the Scribes and Pharisees were, using their power to teach to turn men to their way of thinking without the authority of scripture behind it. It is true that we need to beware of many many 'Scribes and Pharisees' in our modern age, those who would take us from the truth, but equally we need to heed these words in the light of what we do ourselves. [Rom.16:18]. Let us be sure that what we do is to the glory of God and not of ourselves, that v.13 may not be levelled also at us. [1Cor. 10:31].
Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
v.11 - The problem of being 'greatest' is seen extensively in the gospel records [Matthew 18:1,4 23:11 Mark 9:34 Luke 9:46 22:24]
v.12 - Jesus teaches us that God will exalt the humble. [Matthew 23:12] This idea passes into the letters of James and Peter [James 4:10 1 Peter 5:6]

Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2001      reply to Peter
23:14 Devour widows houses Ezekiel 22:25 shows that the leaders in Jesus' days were no better than those who had been taken captive to Babylon - and so would suffer the same fate - captivity - when the Romans came, which they did in AD 70.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2002      reply to Peter
Jesus' ministry started with specific teaching to his disciples - Matthew 5-7, The sermon on the mount. This chapter also contains specific teaching to individuals - The religious leaders. So Jesus public ministry begins and ends with a 'sermon' - but note the difference. The first is instruction to his disciples. The last is a powerful condemnation of the religious leaders of his day.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Peter
Jesus has finally silenced the scribes, Pharisees, Saducees, and the Herodians in chapter 22v22, 34, 46, after they tried to entangle him in his speech (22v15). Now he unleashes a terrible barrage of accusation and condemnation against them. Can you imagine how they felt having the most popular man in Israel publicly exposing them in this way?

Jesus seems to be very emotionally involved in this chapter. He must have been quite wound up to say the things he did with such feeling! But why was he so concerned with their hypocrisy? Surely it was up to them what they did, and Jesus could have concentrated on those more worthy of salvation?

V13 is key. They had been shutting the kingdom up to others. V17, 24, 26 they were blind guides of the blind! This is worse than not having a guide, because a blind man might be able to feel his way on hands and knees if necessary. Jesus was so utterly angry with them because they had shut up the kingdom to the "little ones" who would otherwise have entered it. They had, by adding to the law and making it a burden, made it like a millstone round the necks of those who were trying to be faithful, when really it ought to have been "a schoolmaster to Christ". The Pharisees ought to have been able to see, so that they could guide the way to Jesus, but instead they would drag those they were guiding into a pit with them! (15v14). For this reason they would receive the greater condemnation (v14). They were the ones who were causing the little ones to stumble, and Jesus had said of such "it would be better if ... they were thrown into the sea" (Mark 9v42). After three years of teaching them and pleading with them to repent, he'd finally had enough, and pronounced the judgement of v32-38 on them. This was to be the culmination of all the prophecies regarding the wickedness of Israel "that upon you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth... all these things will come upon this generation".


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2003      reply to Rob
23:38 Whilst the Jewish leaders would have thought of the temple as the house of God Jesus refers to it as ‘your’ house. It was theirs, not God’s.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to Peter
V.29-32 The hypocrisy which Jesus signalizes refers to the fact that these very scribes and Pharisees who occupied themselves with the task of thus honoring the prophets, at the same time were making plans to murder the greatest Prophet of all.  Matt 12:14,   Matt 16:21,    Matt 21:38; 39; 46
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2004      reply to John

V.37-39 Christ's final recorded address fittingly closes with a moving lament in which the severity of Divine judgement on all who have answered such marvelous compassion with contempt.  


John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to John

 

V.23 It is easy for us to stand appalled at the scribes and Pharisees, and to applaud the Lord's tongue-lashing of them.  However, if we are not employing the spiritual qualities of justice, mercy and faith, then we ought to take stock of ourselves.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2005      reply to Michael

23:33 In calling them a 'generation of vipers' Jesus is echoing the rebuke of John the Baptist (Luke 3:7}


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Peter

 

V.35 Jesus puts the blood guilt on the Jewish leaders for all the righteous who have been slain throughout Old Testament times.  He says: the blood of innocent Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Barachiah. 

Abel's murder is recorded in the first book of Old Testament scripture (Gen 4:8); and Zechariah's murder (not the prophet) is recorded in the last book of Old Testament scripture (according to the original Hebrew order) (2Chron 24:20-22).  


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2006      reply to Michael

23:13 The repeated woes, after the parable of the wicked husbandmen – Matt 21:33-41 - spoken on the same day as this chapter shows that Jesus’ mind was still in Isaiah 5 for we read repeated woes there also. Isa 5:5


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2007      reply to Peter

23:16-19        The precise legalism of the Jews was, in fact, their downfall. They thought that their precision was a virtue – they had defined what was acceptable in minute detail – but they missed the spirit of the law – Twice they had been encouraged to understand Hos 6:6 – in Matt 9:13, 12:7 and still the lesson had not sunk home. How are we doing in that respect?


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Peter

 

V.14 This verse is not found in some manuscripts.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2008      reply to Michael

23:11 Seeing greatness is service is a way of thinking which is fundamentally different to the thinking of the flesh. So even when we ‘serve’ we tend to think of what we are doing as some great virtue. However the more we ‘serve’ the lowlier we should think of ourselves.!


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Peter

 

Vs.2,3  It is easy to shake one's head in disgust at Jesus' condemnation of the Pharisees, but we should be careful to examine our own behavior (Matt 5:20).  Doing things decently and in order (1Cor 14:40) should not be an excuse to supplant faith with legalism.

Jesus did not criticize the Pharisees as teachers of the Law, but He did condemn their hypocrisy.  They did not practice what they preached.  It is an easy for anybody to do this, so care must be taken, by us, to make sure our words and deeds are compatible.

V.9 Catholic priests are called father contrary to the command of Christ.  Furthermore, they set themselves up as mediators between God and man.  Again, this is contrary to the scriptures (1Tim 2:5).

Vs.16-22 The Lord's condemnation of the Pharisees' swearing oaths reminds us of our own stance in not taking oaths (James 5:12).

V.24 strain at a gnat (KJV) is better rendered: straining out a gnat (ESV) as the sense is the Pharisees taking care to remove a gnat which has fallen in their drink.  The gnat was unclean according to Law, as was the camel. The gnat was the smallest unclean animal, while the camel was the largest, hence the contrast.

V.27 The hypocrisy of the Pharisees reminds us of the hypocrisy of the Jewish leaders in Ezekiel’s time. Then, they built up a wall and daubed it with untempered motar (whitewash) (Eze 13:10).

In both cases, falsehood was covered over by an attractive exterior. We use the term whitewash, in modern parlance, in referring to the glossing over of mistakes. There's an old plasterer’s saying which says: A good finish hides a multitude of sins.

V.28 Are our hearts compatible with what we show (Rom 2:13; James 1:22)?

V.37 See Isa 31:5.


Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)]     Comment added in 2009      reply to Michael

23:13 Doubtless these Scribes and Pharisees would have been amazed that Jesus said that they bar themselves from the kingdom of God by their actions. However we are likely you do the same thing when we make judgements against others – ‘for with what judgement ye judge ...’ – Matt 7:2


Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Peter

Who does v11-12 remind you of? "whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased". Probably a scribe or pharisee because that's who Jesus was talking about here (see the next verses). Does the Bible give us a specific example? How about Saul of Tarsus? Can you think of any verse that back this up?

 


Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)]     Comment added in 2010      reply to Rob