|
||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.11
- Uriah's attitude here is that of a good man - a man of principle and self-discipline.
Notice he prefaces his argument with words that are very similar to David's own
thinking regarding the dwelling of the ark of the Lord, ch.7:2.
Uriah is saying that he will not exalt himself to this state (as David has done
- with his house of Cedar) while others are not afforded the same privilege. A
laudable attitude. Matt.10:24-25. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| Consider the time
scale involved in the events of this chapter. David planned his sin and it's execution.
On a number of occasions he could have backed away from his sin. He did not. How
often do we plan to sin and carefully execute the plan so that no one knows? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.3
- Uriah is mentioned again in 2Sam.23:39
as being one of thirty seven honourable men that David lists. As Uriah was killed
in the incidents we read of now, this must place ch.23 historically before this
chapter. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:3 Bathsheba as well as being the daughter of Ammiel (1 Chronicles 3:5) is also the grand daughter of Ahithophel (2 Samuel 23:34) Eliam = Ammiel (see margin) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :2
Maybe we see a reflection of David's walking on the roof of his house in Psalm
101:2. The attitude of David in the Psalm contrasts with what happened in
this chapter. Maybe the Psalm was written after David had learnt his lesson from
this event and had repented. How often do we reflect on our failures and use them
to help us to chart our way forward? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 11:2-4 David's behaviour - 'saw' 'beautiful to look upon' 'took' matches Eve (Gen 3:6) where she 'saw' the fruit was 'pleasant to the eyes' and so the 'took' it. So we see the sin of Eve is the sin of mankind - lust! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| David, aware of his own mounting lust, should have gone off to war. But once the sin was committed, from every point of view the best thing would have be to confess to Uriah and seek his forgiveness, but also to make a public act of penitence at the sanctuary of the Lord. Thus the enemies of the Lord would have been kept from their gleeful blasphemy, and the entire nation would have been set a wonderful example of the power of faith in the forgiveness of God. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
| The story of David and Bathsheba is one of adultery and murder. And it all starts in 2Sam 11:1,2 when David was "bored". Being bored is one of the modern generation's "in" words. Let's use this story in our conversations with our young people, because it well illustrates what happened to a Godly man when he hadn't enough to fill his time. David was used to going to war at this time of the year, but this year he sent Joab instead. David couldn't sleep, and his nocturnal pacings up and down led him to cast lusting eyes on a neighbour's wife. And that led to grievous sins. Let us beware. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||
V.2 David lusted after Bathsheba (1John 2:16). Instead of dismissing a potential involvement, he acted upon his lust (James 1:14,15). After the sin was committed, and the due consequence of his act was known, David attempted to cover it up. First, he tried to persuade Uriah to go home. The thought was that if Uriah had sex with Bathsheba, he would take ownership for the pregnancy. This would get David off the hook. This ploy did not work because Uriah refused to go home. He was an honorable man who would not accept privileges that his companions could not. And so, David using his power as king, arranged to have Uriah killed. He was successful, but his sin was not covered up. Yahweh was aware of it (Mark 4:22). David's spiritual lapse is a lesson for us. Let us realize that nothing is hidden from Yahweh who will demand an accounting. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
11:1-5 We should consider the time involved in these events. A realization that some time passed and that there were a number of times when David could have changed his mind about his plans indicate that David’s sin was premeditated and then executed remorselessly. However he was forgiven when he repented – 2Sam 12:13. This should provide us with great comfort, especially when Paul – Rom 4:7-8 – uses David’s Psalm of thanksgiving to speak to us of the magnitude of God’s forgiveness. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We must be careful that we do not look at Bethsheba in a completely negative way as we read this account. We must remember that she was the mother of Solomon, who was a man of peace and of great wisdom. She was also the mother of Nathan, who along with Solomon was a direct ancestor of Jesus. She is also listed along with only two other women in the genealogy of Jesus (Matt 1:6) John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||
11:11 Notice that Uriah, when speaking of the army, describes them as ‘Israel and Judah’. The kingdom was, in reality, divided during David’s reign. The dividing lines already can be seen. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| What a sad chapter, we see many weaknesses of man. David was aware of his mounting lust, and chose to let it develope further, then once the sin was committed, rather than confess to Uriah, chose to do everything to cover up his sin, Bathsheba should have gone to her husband, confessing her unfaithfulness. Uriah's love for his wife was such that he would have forgiven her, as hard as that might have been. Confessing one's sins does not jutify them. But, it is much better than attempting to hide them, always being aware that we can hide nothing from our Heavenly Father. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||
| KEEP BUSY "In the spring, at the time when kings go off to war, David sent Joab out with the king's men and the whole Israelite army." (2Sam 11:1) This all seems perfectly natural. It was the time of year for war, so David's men were all out doing what they did best - conquering the LORD's enemies. They did well. "They destroyed the Ammonites and besieged Rabbah." (v.1) There was one small issue outstanding. "David remained in Jerusalem." (v.1) By rights, if it was the time of year when kings go off to war, David should have been at war leading his men into battle. He had done it before. When Israel came to make David king, the fact that he led them in their battles was one of the deciding factors that eventually crowned him. They said, "In the past, while Saul was king over us, you were the one who led Israel on their military campaigns." (2Sam 5:2) David should have been out there with them. Instead we find David getting out of bed and walking around on the roof of his palace. (2Sam 12:2) David's times of inaction, when he should have been playing his part as leader of his people Israel, led to his sin with Bathsheba, the murder of her husband, and disaster in his household. The lesson for us is to be doing the right things at the right time. We need to stay active in the LORD's work or we, in all likelihood being no better than David, will also fall into sin by looking at or into places we should not. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
11:1 There was nothing inherently wrong with David staying at home. His problem was what he did with the time that he had at his disposal. Likewise there are rarely commands which require us to do anything for God. However if we choose not to do something – such as go to Bible class or Sunday meetings - including the lecture – we have to ask ourselves whether we use our time wisely if we choose to ‘stay at home’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
David had committed adultery and murder. These acts would, by themselves, prevent him from entering the kingdom of God (Gal 5:19-21). However, David was truly repentant of his behavior, and willingly accepted the punishment that Yahweh meted out. He changed his behavior and continued to follow God. Thus, David will be in the kingdom of God. The same forgiveness is available to any sinner who becomes truly repentant and changes his/her life to obey Yahweh. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
11:25 David might have on an impulse taken Bathsheba but the matter of Uriah was totally different. It was carefully calculated. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
There seems to be a triple unfolding into the completion of sin. Psa 1:1 explains that there is: 1) Walking towards sin (opportunity for sin arises, and the possibility crosses the mind). 2) Standing in the sinful place (sin was not dismissed, but is pursued). 3) Sitting down with sinners (sin is consummated). V.2 David walked towards sin V.3 David stood before sin. V.4 David sat down with sin. At each juncture, there is an opportunity to back out of completing a sinful act. The more one progresses down the sinful road, the more difficult it is to back out. The safest place to exit the scene is at phase one. V.26 Uriah was named as one of the David’s thirty valiant men (1Chron 11:41). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
11:2-4 We have noted that David’s behaviour was like that of Eve in seeing, desiring and taking Bathsheba. Also he mimics the behaviour of the sons of God – Gen 6:2 who ‘saw’ ‘fair’ and ‘took’ and Achan who – Josh 7:21 –‘saw’ ‘coveted’ and ‘took’ the spoil. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
2Sam 11:3 - "Uriah" (223) means "flame of Jah, Jehovah (Yahweh) is my light (flame)" was a Hittite who apparently converted to the God of Israel and expressed reverence for the ark (2Sam 11:11); "Bathsheba" (1339) means "daughter of an oath" and though we don't know for certain the specific oath, we have several famous prior oaths in the Bible (Gen 24:6-8;Josh 2:12-21;Num 5:11-22;Josh 9:3-21;Judg 21:6-14) of interest; another name for Bathsheba was "Bathshua" (1340) means "daughter of wealth" (1Chron 3:5). 2Sam 11:6-15 - Uriah had a memorial feast, was figuratively "entombed" by David for three days, was not corrupted and his people fell back from and deserted him (John 18:5-6;Matt 26:56,69-75). Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.1
- The reference here to Moses and Samuel reflects on the times when these men
have pleaded on behalf of the people. Here it is clear that the state of the people
is such that even such pleadings could not be heeded now. Ex.32:11-14,
Num.14:13-20, 1Sam.7:9, 12:23. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.6
- Whilst we might have difficulties understanding how Yahweh could repent we have
plenty of Scripture which shows that he does. [Genesis
6:7 Exodus 32:14 Deuteronomy 32:36 Judges 2:18 1 Samuel 15:35 2 Samuel 24:16 1
Chronicles 21:15 Psalm 135:14 Jeremiah 26:13 19 Joel 2:13 Amos 7:3 6]
And some which shows that He will not [Jeremiah
15:6 Zechariah 8:14]
Once we appreciate that Yahweh is full of mercy we will appreciate that he will
repent of judgement that He has pronounced if He sees repentance in those who
are to be judged. It is only when he has repented time and time again and the
people are still stiff necked that he become 'weary
of repenting' and the judgement follows. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.2
- We have here (borne out by ch.14:12)
evidence that it is possible to go beyond redemption. It is possible to reach
a point where whatever you do, God will no longer forgive. We must pray that we
never reach that point ourselves. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:1
We might wonder why Moses and Samuel are singled out for mention here. Both Moses
and Samuel had the best interest of the nation at heart. Moses interceded for
Israel at the incident of the golden calf and Samuel pleaded with Israel not to
have a king like the nations around them. Thus these two are excellent examples
of men who were not self seeking which contrasted with the leaders to whom Jeremiah
was speaking. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :2
'such as
sword' and 'such as
captivity' are quoted (Revelation
13:10) so the beast out of the sea in Revelation is behaving in the same way
as the oppressor of Israel in Jeremiah's day - the oppressor in Jeremiah's day
was Babylon, as we know so we are given an insight into the way in which Revelation
uses the Old Testament. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 15:4 'to be removed ... the earth' quotes Deut 28:25 showing that the judgments coming upon Judah were a punishment from God - not some natural disaster. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.4 Manasseh was now dead, but the effects of his sins still remained. How much evil one man can cause! The people had followed his wicked example ever since; and it is implied that it was only through the long suffering of God that the consequences had been suspended up to the present time. 2Kin 21:11, 2Kin 23:26, 2Kin 24:3-4 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
FOUR STEP SERVANT 1. "If you repent, I will restore you that you may serve me." (Jer 15:19) The first step in our preparation for serving the LORD is to get our hearts right. We need to repent of our sins, change our way of life and begin living for God. Even if we are already living for him, as Jeremiah was, it is worth examining ourselves to see if there is any wickedness in us, and repenting to purify our hearts. 2. "If you utter worthy, not worthless, words, you will be my spokesman." (v.19) It is easy to get caught up in gossip, course joking or just talking about the weather. Instead let's fill our minds with things that are beneficial so that what comes from our mouths will be worthy of the ears of the LORD. 3. "Let this people turn to you, but do not turn to them." (v.19) Our aim is to bring people to God. We cannot do that if we water down his standards and principles so that they become like the people we are trying to convert. 4. If we do these things, God's promise is that he will be with us, save us, give us strength and redeem us. (v.20-21) So let us become servants for the LORD with pure hearts, bringing a worthy message with strong, unchanging principles and without fear of what people may do when they hear it. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Robert |
||||||||||
| V.16 The prophet Jeremiah here shows us his great love for God's words. He searched for and found them, he believed them, and studied and digested them. As he assimulated them, they became the joy and delight of his heart. We too by eating and digesting the word can receive the same joy and delight. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||
V.1 Yahweh listened to Moses and Samuel, but would not accept Jeremiah's pleading for the people. That was because Yahweh was set on destroying Judah and Jerusalem. The reason for Yahweh's anger goes back to Manasseh. V.4 Manasseh was the longest ruling king of Judah. During his tenure he did the most abominable things in the eyes of Yahweh. Yahweh had already promised that retribution for his actions would come upon Judah and Jerusalem (2Kin 21:11,12). Now was the time for that punishment. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Is Jeremiah speaking of himself in Jer 15:10,15-18? At first sight it seems that he is, especially as God seems to reply to the prophet personally in Jer 15:19-21. But it’s probably the case that Jeremiah is putting himself forward on behalf of the nation, and that God is replying to Judea as a whole. So salvation is again being offered to the nation. Jeremiah’s prophecy isn’t all bad news, then! David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||
15:9 ‘She that hath borne seven’ quotes the words of Hannah – 1Sam 2:5 . Whereas Hannah rejoice because she was to have a son who would become a faithful prophet and priest there was no faithful priesthood now and there did not even look as if there would be. We might say there was no Hannah praying for salvation through the seed of the woman. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.15-17 Jeremiah had absorbed Yahweh's words; had witnessed and prophesied in the Name of Yahweh; and had borne reproach for Him. Vs.18-21 However, he felt somewhat abandoned by Yahweh. Yahweh assures Jeremiah that if he stays the course he, unlike his countrymen, would be delivered and would not suffer the violence of Babylon. Indeed, later a direct order from Nebuchadnezzar would confirm this (Jer 39:11). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:16 The finding of God’s word probably refers to the time that a copy of the law was found in the days of Josiah – 2Chron 34:14 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
15:9 The quotation of the word of Hannah – 1Sam 2:5 – is of a woman who looked for the fulfilment of the promise of the seed of the woman. By this time in Judah’s history it would seem that there were no women looking for the Messiah to be born of them. So far from understanding the purpose of God were they that this did not figure in their minds.
Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
V.3 Joel prophesied against Judah in 835 BC. Jeremiah prophesied against Judah from 627 BC until 585 BC, several generations after Joel. Joel talked of things that would happen generations after him (Joel 1:3). He said that a fourfold disaster would occur to Judah (Joel 1:4). Could Jeremiah's fourfold prophesy, here, be referring to the fourfold fate of Judah that Joel described? Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
15:17 Jeremiah rejoiced when the copy of the law of Moses was found. However that was not the reaction of everyone. From what he says here it would appear that some even mocked when the words were found and read! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v 3-6 First Principles>Kingdom of God>Was overturned>History of fulfilment Go to Deut 28:49 to see more details of the history of Israel and its overturning. Roger Turner [Lichfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Roger |
||||||||||
V.8 Attacks at noonday, the hottest part of the day, were usually suspended because of the heat. And so, any attacks at that time would be unexpected. But, that would be the nature of the Babylonian attack – unexpected. V.9 The number seven is a complete number. Here, the mother (widow) who had produced full progeny was in mourning until death because she had lost every one of her children. V.12 Steel (KJV), as we know it, had not been invented at this time. The indication is that iron had been hardened by copper. That is the intent of the word steel. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
| Jerusalem's incurable wound in v18 could be a reference to the cursings in Deut 28, particularly v27 and v35. And in general it signalled that there was no earthly cure for the Godless condition of God's people. They would receive the rest of those cursings too, as we can see by reading the rest of Deut 28 in light of what Jeremiah is prophesying. But though these things were certain to come upon Israel, God would deliver those who trusted in Him (v20-21, 11). We can take courage in the fact that whenever God causes judgements to come, He will always save those who seek refuge in Him (Psa 18:1-3). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
15:16 Doubtless Josiah rejoiced when the law was read and he loved to hear the words. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| v.6-15
- It seems that this incident with the costly ointment was just the last straw
to Judas. We know that it was Judas himself that offered the objection (John
12:4,5) and we also
know why (John
12:6). It is possible
that Judas could have belonged in this household, as scripture takes pains to
tell us that he is Simon's son (John
6:71, 12:4, 13:2,26).
If so the person doing this act (Mary -
John 12:3) would have
been his sister - thus enraging him further, as that is the way human emotions
are. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| v.25
- Judas asked, but knew what he had already planned with the priests. Maybe he
was testing the water to see if Jesus knew his plans. v.30 - You will remember that there is a vast amount more information in John's account about the events in the upper room. v.31 - 'smite the shepherd ...' quotes [Zechariah 13:7] Examine the context and you will see the aptness of this passage. It is one of judgment - that was to come in AD 70 and deliverance. v.46 - There must be a time gap between verse 46 and 47. It is interesting that now Jesus has set his resolve there is no comment about what he did or thought whilst the disciples were asleep. Neither does he rebuke them for not watching with him. Now the conflict is resolved - thy will be done - the immediate need of fellowship from his disciples is gone. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| 26:15
The covenanting pieces of silver echoes the way that the men of Judah betrayed
Samson. Evil men always behave in the same way. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| :17-20
These verses record the events of a whole day! The rest of the chapter up to v.56
deal with just part of the evening of that same day. Scripture focuses on the
things that are important. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| We like to have
a choice, but sometimes the very fact that we have a choice to make, makes the
choice very difficult. Jesus had a choice to make. His choice was between the
will of his Father, which was that he should die for the sins of the world, or
his own will, which was for the cup to be removed from him. Wouldn't it have been
easier for Jesus if he had not known what hour his captors would take him? Wouldn't
it have been easier for him if it just happened suddenly, and if he couldn't do
anything about it? But God made sure he did know the time (v46),
and that he could do something about it (v53).
What would have happened if Jesus chose to pass up the opportunity of being the saviour of the world? Esther had a very similar choice to make, and I think the council of Mordecai would have been the same to Jesus had he been with him; "For if you remain completely silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place, but you and your father's house will perish" (Esther 4v14). Esther had been placed in her exalted position by God in order for her to effect the salvation of the Jews, nevertheless she had to choose whether she wished to go along with it or not. Choosing to go along with it involved personal suffering for her, because their was the distinct possibility that she would be killed for her efforts (Esther 4v11). The point is, that had she chosen not to be the saviour, God would have provided another. We need to bear this in mind when we think of the struggle of Jesus in Gethsemane. It was a very real and beguiling option for him to give up his struggle, to forego all the pain and suffering, and to allow God to provide another way to save His people. God would have provided another way, but He didn't want it another way. God's will was that it would be Jesus dying shamefully on a tree, and we all sometimes struggle to comprehend why salvation had to come this particular way. Naaman had a similar choice to make. Why should the prophet want him to bathe in a dirty stream? Why particularly seven times? Why did Adam have to abstain from the tree in the middle of the garden? Why did Cain and Abel have to sacrifice a lamb, rather than vegetables? Why did Saul have to kill all the Amalekites completely, not sparing any thing or any one? But God had simply said He wanted it that way. He admonished Saul "Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD?" (1Sam 15v22) We all have that choice to make too, and I'm sure we wish we wouldn't have to make it. There are specific times in our lives where we have to consciously decide to take the road of difficulty because we know it is God's will, or to choose the easy path against His will. There is a whole list of examples in Hebrews 11 of those who had the same choice to make. The one that sums the whole thing up for me is Moses, who "CHOSE rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt; for he looked to the reward." Heb 11v25-26. All these had to choose whether to stand and fight, and so do we. Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Rob |
||||||||||
| v.
38-46 Jesus takes 3 of his disciples to Gethsemane, he wants their support
during his time of great sorrow, telling them to watch with him. The Segond Bible
(French version) may give us more insight: the French language have 4 different
verbs for "go away", and two of them are used in this incident: Jesus uses the
verb "s'eloigner" (moves away from) when he
leaves them temporarily to pray the first and second time. Jesus uses the verb
"quitter" (leaves) the third time he goes
to pray. This verb is meant in the sense of "abandon" an example is: he abandoned
the hotel, or he is never coming back. Why did Jesus not reprimand them the third
time he returned to the disciples. The answer is in Luke
22:43: "And there appeared to him an angel from heaven, strengthening him"
RSV. The answer is obvious, Jesus no longer needed the disciples as a support
system, he knew he could complete the mission which God had appointed for him. Beryl Butler [London West (Can)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Beryl |
||||||||||
| 26:26 In encouraging the disciples to ‘take eat’ Jesus is quoting the prohibition of the angels (Gen 3:22) Whereas Adam and Eve were barred from the tree of life Jesus’ disciples can eat of it. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
| V.74-75 Christ, no doubt must have suffered more because of these denials by a disciple and friend than of the blows and the mockery inflicted on him by his declared enemies. Psa 55:12-14 John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||
Vs.14,15 What a great pity that Judas gave up the kingdom for thirty pieces of silver. Ironically, he did not even live to enjoy his ill-gotten gains. We can also be in danger of giving up the kingdom if we pursue wealth (Matt 6:24; 19:24). Let us make the kingdom our treasure (Matt 6:19-21). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
|
26:22,25 Notice the disciples call Jesus 'lord' whereas Judas calls Jesus 'master'. Judas sees Jesus as a teacher, but the disciples see him as he who is over them. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:32 Whilst Jesus says that he will go to Galilee after his resurrection w should appreciate that happened at least a week after the resurrection – John 20:26. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:38 Jesus’ because of his compassion for mankind and an awareness of his human nature and not wishing to go through with the death on the cross was ‘sorrowful unto death’. Jonah, on the other hand, who lacked compassion was sorrowful unto death because of God’s compassion towards the men of Nineveh. Jon 4:9. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
26:4-5 This insight into the mind of the Jewish leaders sets the scene for Judas’ actions in :15. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Vs.6-13 Jesus visited Simon the leper's house in Bethany. By piecing together the other gospel accounts, we can get a more complete picture. We know that Simon was a Pharisee (Luke 7:36-40). We know that it was Mary who anointed Jesus' feet with the ointment (John 12:3), while her sister Martha served at supper (v.2). Martha's serving would indicate that she was at home. Therefore, Simon the leper (cured by Jesus?), entertained Jesus for dinner at home with his children Mary, Martha, and Lazarus. But we are told of one other person present at that meal - Judas (John 12:4). Judas' father was named Simon. Would it be a stretch to conclude that Judas was also the son of Simon the leper, brother of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus? V.57 Thirty pieces of silver had been given to Judas, the betrayer, to deliver Jesus to them. Jesus was then arrested by the chief priests. Perhaps the psalmist is reflecting the Lord's feeling of entrapment, at this time, when he says: Many bulls surround me; strong bulls of Bashan encircle me (Psa 22:12). But why was this image used? It is a picture is of a helpless man in danger of being gored to death. I wonder if a connection to the Law can be made here. Take a look at Exo 21:32. The elements here are: the bull; the servant; the slavemaster; the owner. Could the bull represent the Law; the servant represent Jesus (see Isa 41:1; Matt 12:18); the owner represent the Jewish authorities; the slavemaster (Heb. adon = controller) represent Judas? Notice that the bull's goring the servant resulted in the death of the bull (the Law was fulfilled by Christ). Jesus had warned the Jewish authorities of their errors, but instead of repenting they killed Him. Therefore, they would die never to be accepted into the kingdom (Luke 13:28). Jesus' warning and their subsequent deaths seem to fit Exo 21:28,29. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||
26:16 The meal in Bethany was actually two days before the passover. However it was only ‘from that time’ that the Jewish leaders had a plan to trap Jesus, after their verbal onslaught of the previous day had failed. So we see they had not long to get their plan together and it was reliant upon Judas’ delivering on his side of the bargain. So all in all it seemed a very precarious agreement. However Jesus was delivered by ‘the determinate counsel ... of God’ – Acts 2:23 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||
Have you ever promised Jesus something you couldn't deliver? Do you regularly declare complete loyalty to him? Peter did (v33) as did James and John (20:22). And it was these three that Jesus requested to watch with him (v37-38). They fell asleep instead. Does Jesus' lesson apply to use too? "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak" (v41). When we have episodes like this in our lives we are reminded that we are not equal to Jesus. He saves us, and not the other way round. This humility is a mindset necessary for salvation. We all have to learn it one way or another, and for some of us it's a hard lesson (v75). Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||