|
||||||||||||
|
AUDIO
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| v.38
- Absalom quotes the advice of God to his servants out of context here - to further
his own ends (although under the law this rapist was worthy of death). We must
be careful that our courage is channelled towards the right things. The servants
of Absalom feared their master more than they feared God. Contrast this with the
Hebrew midwives when receiving similar instructions. Exo.1:16,17,
and with the incidents in 1Sam.22:17,18.
We do well to heed the general warning of Peter in Acts
5:29 too. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| v.1
- This is the first mention of Absalom and introduces the next nine chapters which
deal with Absalom's uprising. It is linked with David's sin with Bathsheba even
though it is separated by some 20 years, because it is the outworking of Nathan's
words [2
Samuel 12:7-12]. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| We see here the
extreme selfishness that can be brought about by human lust and desire. We are
all aware of how we will manipulate circumstances and justify wrong thoughts and
actions just to get what we want. We need stories like this which expose the results
of such thinking to help us stay righteous by God's grace. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| We learn in this
chapter of the scheming nature of Absalom Notice the passage of time from when he killed Amnon until he was back in Jerusalem. 13:23
2 years Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| :37
Absalom fled to Talmai because his maternal grandmother lived there (2
Samuel 3:3) Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| 13:3 Amnon, as well as being an evil person, made a poor choice of friends. For whilst the word 'subtil' 02450 is often translated 'wise' the only wisdom that Jonadab has was the wisdom of this world. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| V.30-31 At this point David's mind went back to the horror of the death of Uriah "As the Lord liveth" he had indignantly declared to Nathan, "the man that hath done this thing.....shall restore fourfold" 2Sam 13:5-6 He, David was that man, He has now paid twofold. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||
| Sexual sins have always been high on humans' list of iniquities. God's restrictions on marriage, and His counsel against incest, did not I'm afraid stop these actions even within David's family. David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to David |
||||||||||||
| V.37 After the murder of Amnon, Absalom fled to Geshur. Geshur was a small buffer state between Israel and Aram. Absalom fled there because he knew he would be welcomed due to family ties. His mother Maacah was the daughter of Talmai, King of Geshur (2Sam 3:3). Therefore, Absalom fled to his grandfather. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
13:21 We might think that david should have done something about the mater. However he left things in God’s hand because he was compromised on the very mater that he needed to judge as he had committed adultery with Bathsheba. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| Rape aside, any sexual act of Amnon with Tamar was contrary to the Law (Lev 18:11). The punishment for this act, under the Law, was death (Lev 20:17). Why did David not administer the appropriate penalty? Was he concerned about kingly inheritance, seeing that Amnon was his firstborn? Or did he recall his own formula for restitution (2Sam 12:6) and try to thwart it? No matter, the restitution formula was sealed with Yahweh, and David had to pay. Amnon avoided death by his father, but died at the hand of his brother Absalom. Yahweh's will was done. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
13:25 Why was David reluctant to go to Absalom’s feast? David clearly loved Absalom. Also it is improbable that David and family would have really been a burden to Absalom. Maybe David was suspicious of Absalom’s intentions. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| 13:24 There can be no doubt that Absalom was David's favorite son, and we would suggest that this had been the case for some time. Absalom appears to have had David's physique, and like his father had personal charm, also he was good looking. David would have seen in him, himself reincarnated. This, it appears is why David was able to ignore the lack of anything that resembled a sense of a God fearing man. David was able to see his son on the surface, but could not see Absalom's heart. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2007 reply to John |
||||||||||||
| SEX Sex. It can be one of the most exciting, endearing and positive acts two people can share. But it can also be the most destructive, disastrous and harmful thing two people can do. The act of sex itself may only take a matter of minutes but the effects of it may last a lifetime. The difference between whether it is good or bad boils down to commitment and marriage. Outside the commitment and love of two people, the guilt of having sex and the consequences of it can ruin a lifetime of relationships and beautiful sexual experiences. On the physical side, it can end up in unwanted pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases and even mental problems. But within the commitment of marriage, sex is the glorious union of two bodies, lovers, who are committed to the absolute best for each other. In a committed marriage relationship there is no guilt or shame, just the ecstasy, unity and love God created it to be. Both the stories of David and Bathsheba, and Amnon and Tamar tell us sad tales of two couples who had sex outside marriage. David's action led to murder, guilt, and had far reaching consequences that eventually tore his family apart. Amnon's action led from love to hatred, murder and rebellion. Sex might seem like no big deal, but no other physical act has been designed to interlink so strongly with the emotions as the way God designed sex. The lesson for us is to save it and keep it within the beauty of a committed and loving marriage as God intended it to be. Robert Prins [Auckland - Pakuranga - (NZ)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Robert |
||||||||||||
13:23 That Absalom harboured his grudge against Amon for two whole years highlights the character of this man. Whilst David loved him he was hardly a Godly man. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
It is ironic that Amnon means faithful. He raped his sister Tamar which belies his name. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
13:3 Jonadab though being David’s nephew, did not share David’s character and it is clear that he was involved in the plot to kill Amnon - 2Sam 13:32 – because of his certainty that all the kings sons were not dead. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
V.1 Tamar means palm. As a princess, Tamar would have worn a long-sleeved, highly decorative garment (v.18). Joseph was a recipient of a similar garment (Gen 37:3). V.20 After the rape, Tamar remained a desolate woman in Absalom’s house. The term desolate (Heb. shamem) means laid waste in a stupefied condition. Tamar’s life as a respected person had been ruined, and she had no hope of becoming a wife and mother. Her whole existence had been numbed by the callous act of a selfish opportunist. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
13:4-5 It seems that Amnon was not as evil as his friend who was his cousin but was easily led. Thus we see that simply because someone is a family member it is not always wise to follow their advice! Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
Who are the Chosen Ones? Gen 12:3;Gen 13:15;Gal 3:8,16,27,28 - through Abraham and his seed (Christ) all nations of the world will be blessed. Gen 10:1-32;Exo 15:27 - the 70 nations and then 70 palm trees (Gentile nations?) along with 12 wells (12 tribes of Israel?). Gen 38:1-2,6-18,24-30 - an illicit relationship between Judah and "Tamar" [(8559) means "Palm-tree"] who was very possibly Gentile but in any event was shamefully treated and initially denied her rights/inheritance which she later received. 2Sam 11:26-27 - similarly, years later we have the Gentile Uriah the Hittite treated shamefully when that which he was entitled was taken from him by David. 2Sam 3:3 - Absalom and seemingly Tamar (a second Tamar) were the children of David and the daughter of a Gentile king of "Geshur" [(1650) means "bridge" which perhaps echos Christ being the true bridge for Jew and Gentile to the promised Abrahamic inheritance when Christ will reign on the throne of David (2Sam 7:16)] as she is referred to as Absalom's sister by David and Ahinoam's (1Chron 3:1) child Amnon (2Sam 13:1-4); In a painful echo to King David of Uriah, Amnon disrespects this second Tamar (2Sam 13:11-22) much like the first with an illicit relationship, shameful treatment and sends her away unbetrothed as a devastated woman deprived of inheritance. There are two mentions of Tamar as a boundary of the promised land (Eze 47:19;Eze 48:28). The first Tamar along with Gentiles Rahab, Ruth and Uriah is mentioned in the account of Christ's genealogy (Matt 1:1-5). While the chosen ones are the Jews, Gentiles are allowed the right to be adopted heirs to the promises made to Abraham (Gen 17:8,18-21;22:18;Deut 7:6;Acts 13:46;Rom 1:16;9:24-27) and thus all God's children (Jew and Gentile) have, in Christ, hope of an inheritance. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| v.5,6
- It is so sad that Israel should have to be used to present this obviously truthful
point. They should have been the example for v.7,8.
Where are we in all this? Let us consider v.9,10
carefully and look to our own salvation. Gen.8:21,
Job 15:14-16, Psa.51:5, Jer.16:12. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
Links Between Jeremiah 17 & John 8
So it may be that Jesus had this area of Jeremiah in mind when the woman taken in adultery was brought to him. v.4 - predicts the Babylonian captivity because of their sinfulness which was a pattern of what happened in AD 70 for the same reason. Jesus may well have been drawing their attention to the consequences of following legalism and ignoring the spirit of the law of Moses. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| v.1
- Sin is written where the law should sit - in the hearts of the people - and
written there indelibly it would seem, with a pen of iron and the point of a diamond. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| 17:9
Whilst we are probably well aware of the fact that the heart is deceitful we should
notice the progression through the chapter.
:1
Judah's sin was graven on their heart. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| :21-26
Even though Israel violated the laws of God there was hope. God, through Jeremiah,
called for repentance. If Israel had repented - even at this late time - He would
have forgiven them and blessed them. Such is the mercy of our Father. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| 17:19 'Go and stand in the gate' Jeremiah was not giving his message in secret or in a corner. This would have heightened the pressure on Jeremiah but would leave the people without excuse when the judgment came. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| V.21 TAKE HEED This is certainly a watch word for everyone of us as we read the Word. The Hebrew is SHAMAR (8104) Which means to know, be seeing, recognize, understand. It is translated; beware, keep, observe, preserve. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||
V.8 The symbol of the righteous flourishing as well-watered trees is a theme throughout the Scriptures (Psa 92:12,13). An early encounter with well-watered trees in the Bible came at Elim (strong trees) (Exo 15:27). The twelve wells (springs) represent the twelve tribes, while the seventy palm trees symbolize the seventy elders of Israel (Exo 24:9). Palms, which symbolize the righteous, were part of the decoration of Solomon's temple (1Kin 6:35). They will also be part of the fourth temple which shall be built in the Kingdom (Eze 41:18). In the Kingdom, health and healing will come via trees. The Redeemed are represented by these trees (Eze 47:12; Rev 22:2). V.13 It is Yahweh who is the source of living water. Jesus, the Son of God, is the embodiment of living waters (John 4:14; 7:38). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
God made man, and enabled his heart to think and reason, (that’s 1611 language, of-course. We would say “brain”.) 1,600 years went by, and to Noah God described man’s thoughts in his heart as “only evil continually” (Gen 6:5). Then, a further 2,000 years later, to Jeremiah, God says, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked” (Jer 17:9). How terribly sad! God had watched his creation, and generally speaking they were rotten to the core – even His specially chosen people. There were exceptions. Noah and Jeremiah were two godly men. But how it must have hurt the Lord to see what His creation were doing with the heart He had given them.
David Simpson [Birmingham Kings Norton (UK)] Comment added in 2005 reply to David |
||||||||||||
| Jer 17:9 - The Hebrew word labe (3820) literally means heart but figuratively can mean feelings, will, or even the intellect, etc. Sometimes we know full well when we do things that are wrong (though we may fool others). Other times we may even fool ourselves with wrong thinking/rationalization, etc. Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||
17:6-7 The contrast between those who trusted in man and those who trusted in God is quoted by Paul – 2Cor 1:9 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| Jer 17:23 - stiffed necked seems to imply proud, arrogant, stubborn, and possibly dense: "Yet they did not listen or pay attention; they were stiff-necked and would not listen or respond to discipline." Charles Link, Jr. [Moorestown, (NJ, USA)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Charles |
||||||||||||
Verses 7-8 are almost taken verbatim from Psa 1:1-3. However, notice the change between the two characteristics of "the man". Here in Jeremiah it is the man who trusts in the LORD. In Psalm 1 it is the man whose delight is in the law of the LORD. Is Jeremiah telling us that our lack of faith simply comes from our lack of delight in God's word? (Rom 10:17) Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||
17:9-10 Notice the God who searches the heart is aware that man’s heart is wicked. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
17:8 The man who trusts God being like a tree planted by water picks up the language of Psa 1:3 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
Vs.19,20 Jeremiah was told to make sure that everybody heard the message of Yahweh. He was to proclaim God's Word in all the gates of Jerusalem. He was to begin at the King's gate (Gate of David) and then proceed to the other eleven gates. All bases should be covered in preaching. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
17:10 In speaking of God searching the heart Jeremiah echoes the sentiments of 138:23. However that God searched the hearts had no effect on Judah so they were taken into captivity. Jeremiah then laments – Lamentations of Jer 3:40 – with the same words as he uses here as an appeal after Jerusalem has been taken. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
V.9 The heart is the center of all human thoughts and emotions. From the heart come actions. It is from the heart that all ungodly deeds arise (Mark 7:21-23) And so, the human heart is full of deceit and cannot be trusted for honesty (Prov 28:26). The heart is desperately wicked (KJV); desperately sick (ESV). Wicked (sick) comes from the Hebrew awnash. In other passages, this word is translated incurable (e.g. Jer 30:12). This shows the hopeless situation of the heart in terms of godliness. V.10 Heart and reins (kidneys) are often mentioned together as the seat of all desires and affections. V.14 Being all alone, Jeremiah appeals to Yahweh for protection against the hostility from all sides (Psa 109:3). V.21 The Sabbath Day observance was fundamental to the Jewish worship of Yahweh. From the breach of the Sabbath came all the other breakdowns in worship. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
17:1 Whereas the law was to be written upon the ‘heart’ – Prov 3:1– it was Israel’s sin that was written there. What an indictment of Israel. But what is written in our hearts? Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| v.4
- Here is where love casts off fear. The keepers were petrified with fear and
yet 'Mary Magdalene and the other Mary' were able to listen coherently,
it would seem. The record of these women actually seeing Jesus is not mentioned
specifically in Paul's list in 1Cor.15:1-8,
and yet they did (v.9).
This suggests that maybe Paul's list was not exclusive. Peter Cresswell [Derby Bass Street (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| v.11-15
- The fact that the chief priests were Sadducees, and therefore specially interested
in guarding against what would appear as a contradiction of their main dogma -
that there is no resurrection - must not be forgotten, as in part determining
their action. Their own guard became the clearest, most unwitting and least suspected
witness of the resurrection. It became more than unbelief now; it was a deliberate,
wilful lie. Their enmity leads them on now to reject what they knew was the truth,
even if they perished everlastingly. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| Where had Jesus
been after his resurrection?
In v2-4 we get a description of the angel that descended from heaven. In Daniel 10v5-8 we find a heavenly being described in exactly the same way, and having the same effect on those who saw him.Well, almost exactly... The one thing that's missing is the "clothing white as snow" (v3). This description apears in Dan 7v9, describing the ancient of days. So in the description of the angel in Matthew, we have links to two chapters in Daniel. After his disciples had assembled in Galilee, Jesus appeared to them and said "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth". In Daniel 7v9-14 we find a vision of one "like the son of man" coming to the ancient of days, and being given all dominion and glory,... and the reason? "That all peoples and nations and languages should serve Him" (Dan 7v14). What was the first thing Jesus said to the desciples in our Matthew reading? "Go therefore and make desciples of all the nations." Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2001 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||
| 28:11
So the guards report to the leaders and their reaction demonstrates that they
knew that Jesus had been raised from the dead, but they did not want to believe
it. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2002 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| :3
'his raiment white as snow' quotes Daniel
7:9 thus presenting Jesus as the one who will open the books (Daniel
7:10) at the time of the end. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2003 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| 28:20 ‘I am with you’ is the final fulfillment of Isa 7:14 ‘God with us’. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2004 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
V.20 Matthew's gospel record provides us with many comforting words, beginning, middle, and the end.
John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2004 reply to John |
||||||||||||
| V.5 Luke and John both speak of two angels, while Mark and Matthew here, of only one. Why the difference? The reason for the difference has not been revealed to us. There is, of course, no contradiction, for neither Matthew nor Mark state that there was only one angel. John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to John |
||||||||||||
V.19 Trinitarians use this verse as one of their pet quotes. For this reason, some are uncomfortable having this verse read at baptisms. Correctly understood there should be no problem. This verse, in no way, agrees with the Trinity. Baptizing in is better understood as baptizing into (See 1Cor 10:2). Jesus was given all authority in heaven and earth (v.18). Jesus is now manifest with His Father, and so all things that apply to the Father apply to Him, in the Deity. It is clear that all brothers and sisters of Jesus are baptized into Jesus (Gal 3:27). But, by extension, Jesus' brothers and sisters come into covenant relationship with Yahweh. In the Kingdom, and beyond, the Yahweh, Jesus, and the Redeemed will be truly manifest (1Cor 15:27,28). Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2005 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
|
28:17 We should realise that the 'some' which doubted were not the eleven. We have now moved on in time after the meetings that Jesus had with the disciples in the upper room. Thomas has already made his declaration of belief. This comment must be about some of the '500' who Paul speaks about in 1Cor 15:6 Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2006 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
V.9 We have often wondered why Jesus appeared to the women before he appeared to the eleven disciples? We can go back to V.5 and also ask why did the angel appear unto the women, rather than to the likes of Peter and John? Does anyone have any thoughts? John Wilson [Toronto West (Can)] Comment added in 2006 reply to John |
||||||||||||
28:6 in being invited to ‘come and see’ the women are being invited to be eyewitnesses of the resurrection of Jesus. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2007 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
28:9 The worshiping of Jesus is a fulfilment of Isa 27:13. Salvation has been achieved and so the women – representative of the ecclesia – honour the son. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2008 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
28:6‘as he said’ reminded the women that the resurrection of Jesus should not have been a surprise to them. He had spoken of it often in his life. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
V.19 This verse does not admit a triune God. Name (Gr. onoma) is synonymous with authority. Authority is the domain of Yahweh, the creator and sustainer of all things. Yet, He has placed it in the hands of His Son (v.18). Therefore, humankind is obligated to listen to and to obey the commandments of Jesus (Psa 2:12; Matt 17:5). Obedience will bring salvation while disobedience will bring destruction (Heb 5:9; 2Thess 1:8). Jesus is the only means of salvation (Acts 4:10,12). Baptism is essential for salvation (Mark 16:16). Baptism represents a symbolic burial with Jesus of the old carnal man, so that the new spiritual man might emerge (Rom 6:3-5). Hence, we can see the necessity of being baptized into Jesus (Gal 3:27). That is how the apostles baptized. However, it should be understood that Jesus is the express image of His Father (Heb 1:3) and was given the Holy Spirit without measure (John 3:34). Thus the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are expressions of God manifestation and not three elements of a triune god. Michael Parry [Montreal (Can)] Comment added in 2009 reply to Michael |
||||||||||||
28:12-14 The haste with which the religious leaders were willing to bribe the guards highlights that they actually believed that Jesus had been raised form the dead. They did not think that the disciples had stolen the body. Peter Forbes [Glenfield (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Peter |
||||||||||||
| As Jesus leaves them he tells them: "I am with you always" (v20). Yet we know he did leave them (Acts 1). Can you find any other recent words of Jesus that explain what he meant here? Rob de Jongh [Mountsorrel (UK)] Comment added in 2010 reply to Rob |
||||||||||||